Valuetainment - June 18, 2026


"The Project Was Orphaned" – The Pendragon Cycle Almost BROKE The Daily Wire


Episode Stats


Length

14 minutes

Words per minute

205.52

Word count

2,934

Sentence count

176

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

5

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

On this episode of the podcast, we sit down with the founder of The Daily Wire, Ben Shapiro. Ben Shapiro is a film producer, screenwriter, producer, executive producer, and co-founder of Pendragon, a media company that has built a name for itself as one of the most influential companies in the entertainment industry. In this episode, Ben talks about how he built the company, how he got to where he is today, and what it takes to be successful in the film industry.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
00:00:00.000 Bet mode activated.
00:00:01.820 The Scorebet app here with trusted stats and real-time sports news.
00:00:05.220 Yeah, hey, who should I take in the Boston game?
00:00:07.280 Well, statistically speaking.
00:00:08.840 Nah, no more statistically speaking. I want hot takes. I want knee-jerk reactions. 0.99
00:00:13.280 That's not really what I do.
00:00:15.440 Is that because you don't have any knees? Or...
00:00:17.840 The Scorebet. Trusted sports content, seamless sports betting. Download today.
00:00:23.360 19 plus, Ontario only.
00:00:24.760 If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or the gambling of someone close to you,
00:00:27.840 please go to conixontario.ca.
00:00:30.000 In regards to the movie that you did, what was the name of the movie that you did, the big one?
00:00:33.700 The Pendragon Cycle.
00:00:34.660 The Pendragon Cycle.
00:00:36.040 Were you going for, like, was that your strategy to say, you know what, screw it, I'm going to go for all the marbles,
00:00:41.680 because if we nail this, this could be our house of cards.
00:00:43.840 This could be our, you know, this could be our show that's going to bring us from whatever,
00:00:47.980 2 million subscribers to 10 million subscribers.
00:00:50.480 We could be a householder.
00:00:51.480 Was that kind of your strategy?
00:00:53.220 Absolutely, yeah.
00:00:54.280 You know, if you look at the history of the films that we did during my tenure at The Daily Wire,
00:00:58.360 they get bigger and bigger as we go.
00:00:59.520 you take bigger and bigger risks because you can't you can't run the same play twice you know
00:01:06.100 the first play was to acquire a movie that we didn't make dallas sonnier's run hide fight
00:01:11.280 written and directed by kyle rankin it's a fabulous film we're very lucky to get it and we got it
00:01:17.280 because uh dallas kind of got canceled in hollywood after having made this film and it didn't have a
00:01:24.180 home and you know it was ben who actually saw the opportunity ben uh had interacted with dallas in
00:01:29.060 the past and he spoke to dallas and heard about the challenges dallas the dallas was dealing with
00:01:33.340 with run hide fight and he called and said hey you need to talk to this dallas guy i think there's
00:01:37.480 you know this could be a movie that we could pick up and and it had always been part of our strategy
00:01:41.840 to move into making culture not just criticizing culture and then immediately after that i tried
00:01:48.040 to acquire another film and it didn't move the needle for us at all kind of same budget range
00:01:52.560 also an acquisition a licensing deal didn't move the needle for us so now we need to now we have
00:01:58.560 to actually go into production on something.
00:02:00.260 And we made an overall deal with Dallas.
00:02:02.900 And we produced Terror on the Prairie with Gina Carano.
00:02:06.220 And it did very well for us.
00:02:10.260 But I sort of learned by then, well, you've got to continue to...
00:02:14.440 I sort of learned this from Elon Musk.
00:02:16.820 And it's that in a certain kind of company, this isn't true for every company.
00:02:21.120 Like, you couldn't do this if you had an accounting firm.
00:02:23.640 But in certain kinds of companies, part of what you're selling to the audience
00:02:27.100 is a vision for what the future can be.
00:02:30.740 The Daily Wire was saying to our audience,
00:02:32.280 there is a future where conservatives aren't losing.
00:02:35.240 There's a future where we have political power and cultural power.
00:02:39.960 And, you know, if you look at Jeremy's Razors
00:02:42.180 and some of the things we did in consumer goods,
00:02:43.900 where we're also represented in the consumer goods space,
00:02:48.900 where every single company isn't against you all the time.
00:02:52.740 And as you sell that vision to the audience,
00:02:55.020 The vision has to be ahead of where you are because it has to inspire.
00:03:02.000 Elon's great at this.
00:03:02.980 Elon's, you know, I'm sure you've got a deposit in on a Roadster or whatever, the Tesla Roadster.
00:03:08.220 I've got a deposit on you.
00:03:09.440 When are we going to get it?
00:03:10.300 I don't know.
00:03:10.880 Do you think he's going to give it to you?
00:03:12.020 Yeah, because that's the other thing you have to do.
00:03:13.920 You have to deliver on those promises.
00:03:15.820 So you're always making a promise that's a little further ahead than where you are.
00:03:18.840 And you can keep that going as long as you come along behind it and deliver.
00:03:23.680 So we sold the Gina Carano movie before we made it.
00:03:28.280 And then we made it, and it was good.
00:03:30.600 We sold the kids' platform, Binky, before we made it.
00:03:35.940 And then we released it.
00:03:37.180 The model is, if you want us to do this, come help us support this, or what is the sequence?
00:03:41.840 Well, we never use support because we don't want people to think of it as donations.
00:03:46.380 It's a for-profit business, but it is like, come alongside us and help us build the future.
00:03:51.320 Your subscription gets you everything that we are now,
00:03:53.700 but your subscription is also going to get you the things that we will be
00:03:56.040 as a result of your subscription.
00:03:57.580 And so same with Pendragon.
00:03:59.000 We told the audience about Pendragon when we first acquired the rights.
00:04:05.560 We took them along on the journey with us as we made it.
00:04:08.380 And, yeah, it was bigger than anything we had ever made.
00:04:13.600 It's bigger than anything any conservative media company has made in my lifetime.
00:04:16.600 How successful was it?
00:04:18.560 I've been gone for a year when they released it.
00:04:19.820 post you yeah it's post you yeah okay were you in it at all or just so you know i know nothing
00:04:25.180 about the story are you in the movie are you not in the movie i directed um two of the episodes
00:04:30.380 and i was what you call the showrunner okay so i oversaw the writing room i oversaw the set
00:04:35.520 you know i didn't oversee the set from the point of view of like dallas sonia who's running the
00:04:39.060 crew but i was that i was the lead creative on set so i was in eastern europe for i was in not
00:04:44.480 I was in Hungary and Italy and Romania for six months
00:04:47.700 and substantially made the show,
00:04:50.840 you know, with the team, made the show.
00:04:52.820 But the show was released a year after I left.
00:04:57.420 Do I think it was as successful as we had hoped it would be?
00:04:59.980 No, I don't think it was successful
00:05:00.980 the way that we hoped it would be.
00:05:02.380 I think it was orphaned
00:05:03.720 in the same way so many other projects were orphaned.
00:05:05.520 You know, when the CEO and founder of the company,
00:05:09.300 who was also the creator and showrunner of the project, leaves,
00:05:12.660 of course that project's going to be orphaned to a large degree. The company changed even the
00:05:17.400 strategy that it was pursuing. But Pendragon made perfect sense as the next step in the strategy
00:05:24.340 that we had been running for the last five years. It was the next big step. We had released content
00:05:31.300 that had made the kind of money that Pendragon would have had to have made to pay for itself.
00:05:35.160 So it's not as though we got so far ahead of ourselves that we would have to achieve a success
00:05:39.160 unlike any other just to break even.
00:05:41.860 No, we would have to replicate past successes
00:05:43.980 in order to break even on the show.
00:05:46.040 But it was certainly a bigger bet than any that we had taken up until that time.
00:05:50.620 Do you think that brought unnecessary pressure on the company?
00:05:53.540 With you being gone six months, Romania, all of that,
00:05:56.200 where you're not doing the day-to-day operation at the headquarters?
00:05:59.220 Yes.
00:06:00.460 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:06:01.040 What would you have done differently?
00:06:02.900 I don't know.
00:06:04.560 Certainly there were mistakes there.
00:06:07.100 I'm not even talking about mistakes.
00:06:08.440 To me, it's more about...
00:06:09.500 Well, it's learning mistakes.
00:06:10.700 No, what I'm not trying to...
00:06:12.820 That's not where I'm going.
00:06:13.680 What I'm trying to find out is purely strategically.
00:06:15.740 Like, was it better for you to be at the home office
00:06:18.940 operating and hiring somebody else to run that show?
00:06:22.860 That's what I mean.
00:06:24.020 What I would have done differently
00:06:25.120 is I would have taken my executive team with me.
00:06:27.600 It's not that I would have stayed behind
00:06:29.800 because both things are true.
00:06:32.540 The company was engaged in the largest,
00:06:34.760 most consequential project it had ever been engaged in.
00:06:37.560 it needed all of our best talent to shepherd it and we still had a company to run and it needed me
00:06:45.000 to be there shepherding it so what's the answer to that well the answer to that is
00:06:48.840 i should have we should have treated it as though not that i went to hungary with dallas sonye to
00:06:55.060 make a movie but the daily wire went to hungary to engage in the next huge project that we were
00:07:01.740 going to engage to and you might say well that's not scalable over time but i'm not talking about
00:07:06.060 over time i'm talking about the first time i have a very different opinion to me it was you were you
00:07:10.420 were trying to hit a grand slam and if it goes your your uh reed hastings jr you're a you know
00:07:20.400 you guys could have gone from two to 20 million if you're at 20 million now everybody's coming to
00:07:24.300 you saying hey what are we doing the 50 million auto movie the 100 million auto movie and i think
00:07:27.940 you have to take a risk like that to see if it's going to land or not i'm telling you i remember
00:07:32.840 We're about to go to Tuscany, Italy.
00:07:34.480 I'm taking my 20 best guys.
00:07:36.880 I'm renting this, you know, 17-bedroom property on the top of the hills.
00:07:41.300 And 20 guys, 10 couples.
00:07:43.020 Let's go live on a higher chef.
00:07:44.200 We're going to have a good time.
00:07:45.580 And before going, there's a guy named Carl DeMoss and one other guy.
00:07:50.100 They tell me, go watch House of Cards.
00:07:52.540 I said, House of Cards?
00:07:53.480 Yeah, go watch House of Cards.
00:07:54.560 On what?
00:07:55.500 On Netflix.
00:07:56.240 What's Netflix?
00:07:56.980 I literally wasn't on Netflix.
00:07:58.280 So I go download Netflix, and I'm like, I can't just watch one episode.
00:08:03.200 I stayed up all night watching every one of the episodes in season one.
00:08:07.180 And then I get on the flight in the morning.
00:08:08.440 I have no sleep.
00:08:09.700 What did House of Cards do to Netflix?
00:08:12.240 Take House of Cards out. 0.91
00:08:13.280 House of Cards took Netflix.
00:08:14.700 House of Cards is probably the most successful show of all time.
00:08:19.520 Because if you say, how much money did House of Cards make?
00:08:21.600 $200 billion.
00:08:22.660 That's right.
00:08:23.000 Made $200 billion.
00:08:23.600 Yeah, yeah, that's right.
00:08:24.420 That's right.
00:08:24.740 So that kicked it off. 0.60
00:08:25.620 So, you know, from an operator to an operator, I respect that you have the balls to take that kind of a risk.
00:08:30.840 It's not easy to do. 0.67
00:08:31.620 You've got to do it.
00:08:32.600 But also, if it doesn't hit, you've got to take the heat with it as well, and that's kind of how this thing works.
00:08:37.100 You're either going to go or you're not going to go.
00:08:38.340 Today, everybody's talking about SpaceX, the biggest, you know, he's a trillionaire now.
00:08:43.840 4,400 people are millionaires.
00:08:45.880 You know, 33 people that are non-executives, non-directors, non-VPs, non-managers.
00:08:52.280 Their stock today is worth $200 million to $400 million.
00:08:55.100 Think about that, right?
00:08:56.200 $200 million to $400 million.
00:08:58.180 These are not leaders.
00:08:59.560 These are not people that you know, right?
00:09:00.840 One guy was like, you know, just a regular job that they had.
00:09:03.760 But go back and look at the first three, Falcon, you know,
00:09:06.400 the failures that they had back to back to back.
00:09:09.060 And so does the business model become,
00:09:11.560 so if I'm going and doing a $50 million project,
00:09:13.820 let's just say three projects, I'm doing $50 million.
00:09:16.220 Do I have to have on the back end $200 million ready?
00:09:19.680 So if two of them fail, I need the next one and the next one and the next one?
00:09:23.640 So how much of this is fundraising?
00:09:24.920 Because you need a lot of money.
00:09:27.560 You need a lot of money.
00:09:29.280 The Daily Wire grew completely out of cash flow for a decade.
00:09:33.820 We took on $4.7 million of investment the day we started.
00:09:38.960 And we grew to $200 million plus revenue engine over the course of a decade,
00:09:45.740 completely out of cash.
00:09:47.720 Now, by the time we got to Pendragon,
00:09:49.300 we knew that if we were going to make these larger entertainment plays,
00:09:51.860 that's not going to continue to work.
00:09:53.180 because the business model up until that point
00:09:56.660 was most of our content, not all, most of our content,
00:10:00.520 we made it, put it through post-production,
00:10:05.140 released it, and started monetizing it in the same day.
00:10:09.520 Well, you can't do that with a movie.
00:10:10.960 You know, a movie's a multi, in some cases,
00:10:12.420 in the case of Pendragon, it's a multi-year project.
00:10:13.960 In every case, it's a year-long project
00:10:15.760 or an 18-month-long project.
00:10:17.360 So your capital's getting tied up for a lot longer.
00:10:20.180 Now, the subscriptions can bring you in
00:10:21.340 a lot of revenue really fast once you release it,
00:10:23.180 but you've tied up that capital.
00:10:24.680 So we'd never really been in a business before where we were tying up capital.
00:10:28.680 And that's part of what was going on in the last couple of years at the Daily Wire,
00:10:31.700 was thinking differently about the structure of the business
00:10:33.780 to make it possible to bring on capital in ways that we had never
00:10:37.500 sought to bring on capital before.
00:10:40.280 And one of the advantages of never having brought on capital in all these years
00:10:44.800 is that we had freedom of action, freedom of decision.
00:10:49.040 We were able to be nimble.
00:10:50.340 We were able to move very, very quickly.
00:10:52.680 One of the benefits of being able to bring on capital is the founders can get a little
00:10:56.640 liquidity, and you can make things that tie up capital.
00:11:00.080 You can make Pendragon.
00:11:01.480 You can make whatever was going to come after Pendragon.
00:11:03.620 I know The Daily Wire has made at least two movies since I left.
00:11:05.960 They're not out yet, but it's not as though they've pivoted out of entertainment.
00:11:09.440 They've pivoted away from my sort of strategy around some of that, but they haven't pivoted
00:11:13.360 out of entertainment.
00:11:14.480 And all of that requires thinking differently about capital, which requires changing how
00:11:19.640 some governance works and requires changing how some structure works that's that's a natural
00:11:25.880 consequence of some of those changes yeah very interesting you know it'll be interesting to see
00:11:31.380 who else comes in does it how especially with now with ai are we going to start seeing guys making
00:11:36.360 cartoons takes off subscribership on the conservative side i don't know but uh you know
00:11:42.280 to me i do think the model of being decentralized of smaller creators not needing to be part of a
00:11:49.380 big company may disrupt the one big, gigantic, conservative company we built.
00:11:55.860 Maybe I'm wrong.
00:11:56.520 We'll see what happened there.
00:11:57.500 Can I push back on that for a while?
00:11:58.420 Do so.
00:11:58.780 I'd love to, yeah.
00:11:59.620 Because I don't think you're wrong.
00:12:00.440 Obviously, we live in the moment of the independent content creator.
00:12:03.300 My argument is that's just a moment like every other moment.
00:12:09.400 But look what you do here.
00:12:11.220 This isn't an independent content creator operation.
00:12:14.160 This is a business.
00:12:14.920 I mean, you've built a massive business around your brand,
00:12:18.480 extending out from the business that you had already been very successful with before you started this.
00:12:22.820 But ultimately, Patrick Bet David is the – you're not Joe Rogan making a show with one guy at your house
00:12:31.920 that happens to be the biggest show in the world.
00:12:35.460 You're still right now sit here as a businessman who has ambition way beyond the content that you create every day.
00:12:41.860 And a lot of the guys who move into this space have those kinds of aspirations,
00:12:45.680 but you and I both know how hard it is to do what you do.
00:12:48.720 We both know how hard it is to actually build and scale,
00:12:51.160 how much risk you actually have to be willing to take,
00:12:53.380 how many mistakes and failures and losses you have to make and then recover from,
00:12:58.140 even just the emotional ability to recover from major losses.
00:13:02.120 There are people who are way better than you and me who didn't succeed
00:13:06.440 because they couldn't overcome just the emotional reality of the losses that they had to take. 1.00
00:13:10.500 And you and I are kind of stupid. 0.99
00:13:12.040 We slam our finger in the drawer and we go, well, I'm going to learn not to put my finger in the drawer. 1.00
00:13:15.900 And then three days later, you slammed a whole different finger in a whole different drawer, you know.
00:13:19.760 And so I do think that we live in the moment of the independent content creator.
00:13:23.620 But in the end, business is hard.
00:13:26.840 When we set out to create a shoe that blends comfort, function, and luxury, we had the choice to make it fast.
00:13:34.660 We had the choice to make it cheap.
00:13:36.800 We chose neither.
00:13:38.460 Instead, we chose Tuscaneer.
00:13:40.200 We chose true Italian craftsmanship, each pair touched by 50 skilled hands.
00:13:46.220 We chose patience, spending two years perfecting every detail, and we chose the finest quality at every step.
00:13:53.620 Introducing the Future Looks Bright collection.
00:13:57.360 Not rushed, not disposable, not ordinary.
00:14:01.600 Rather, intentional, luxurious, timeless.
00:14:10.820 If you enjoyed this video, you want to watch more videos like this, click here.
00:14:13.760 And if you want to watch the entire podcast, click here.