00:01:19.500The paper refers to wave mechanics, conservation energy, and quantum equations, but applies them in nonstandard or speculative ways.
00:01:27.220For example, replacing Planck's content with Howard's Coma constant is unsubstantiated and lacks empirical validation.
00:01:34.820And last but not least, citation issues.
00:01:37.740The reference include real scientists, Einstein, Planck, alongside fictional or pseudoscientific collaborators, Howard Seeley, Yee, Yee, Yee, Yee, et al.
00:01:57.720Now, if you put in, that's why the stuff that I sent you, I wanted to send, you have to put in the curvilinear thing into AI so it has the full, so it has the full basis in which to evaluate it.
00:02:16.360Because one of the things that the computers or the AI has been lacking, its foundation is all based off of the Cartesian space, off the one times one equaling one, off of a redundancy inside of a system instead of matching it to a universal conformed system.
00:02:43.600Doctor, your question for you, do you, from, you know, working with NASA, the government, how often do you guys use, whether it's for papers, credibility, things that you question, how often do you guys use Grok or OpenAI, ChadGBT?
00:05:17.000All of the stuff that we've been doing, the reason that we were forced to go to the AI route was, like I said, I brought all of the wave conjugations.
00:05:26.920I brought the actual geometry to people like Eric Weinstein, and they did nothing with it.
00:05:33.920Instead of evaluating it, I thought he would share it among his friends and talk about it.
00:05:38.680No, they just said it there, even though it was for grand, super symmetrical systems.
00:05:43.920Let me ask a question from you, Dr. Yu.
00:05:45.860When, because the argument was made that peer review, you're not a peer to review it, like you're not a qualified peer to review.
00:05:52.740Is that how it's seen in your world, where peer review is another person that's a qualified doctor, you know, schooling, and they've done the right thing to look there?
00:06:01.960Sure, that's the common practice in establishing the physics community, but I believe this is a gatekeeper to silence, to squash, to suppress.
00:08:53.560Gravity, they could have gotten rid of a long time ago.
00:08:56.340The gravity issue sits out there and the electromagnetism that they've been trying to bond forever instead of recognizing that they're already one system.
00:09:06.240But their approach is completely off with it.
00:10:07.500That electricity is always spinning northeast, seeking a higher pressure condition, trying to, spinning to the right, trying to get to the apex and the center of something, centripetally spinning.
00:10:19.840Then as it gets to the center, it gets pushed out by another electrical part of the wave.
00:10:26.620And once it gets to the edge of the boundary and no longer has the potential of being trapped in there, now it gets devitalized.
00:10:34.620And as a result of being devitalized, it's no longer able to spin northeast anymore.
00:10:40.100Now it's spinning southwest because it's taking on, putting on these things.
00:12:33.580And we keep measuring things as if they are dead and still and going to remain in this in this set place when things are not just stuck here.
00:12:43.380They are always in motion and the motion is always spherical.
00:12:47.540The motion is never in a straight line.
00:12:50.620And if they make that one adjustment and start measuring things based upon the spherical or spiral nature of everything, then all of their measurements would equal up.
00:13:01.740Then they would have balance in their energy systems.
00:13:05.180But because they're using straight lines, I'll use this point again.
00:13:07.940Again, like with a computer chip, 90 per, all of the, you have these 90 degree angles with the computer chip keeps turning, you know, going at the speed of light or just under the speed of light.