Valuetainment - April 07, 2025


＂The Universe Is NOT What They Told You!＂ - Terrence Howard EXPLODES On The Gatekeepers Of Science

Hosted by
Patrick Bet-David
Mentioned
James Clark Maxwell Howard Coma Terrence Howard Eric Weinstein Howard Seeley Verdict Grok
＂Rebuilt Saturn WITHOUT Gravity＂ – Terrence Howard's MIND-BLOWING Simulation CHALLENGES Science “Should’ve Been 9-0” – Trump Scores MAJOR Supreme Court WIN Over Venezuelan Migrant Deportations

Episode Stats


Length

14 minutes

Words per minute

146.38

Word count

2,114

Sentence count

205


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, we are joined by Dr. Rob Wojtajcic, an AI technologist working with NASA and the Department of Defense, to talk about how they are using AI to solve the mystery of the universe.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 And what would you like me to ask ChatGPT?
00:00:01.740 Just ask it to evaluate.
00:00:03.160 Is it right or wrong?
00:00:08.000 I wouldn't put my face on ChatGPT's answer.
00:00:13.220 Well, I couldn't get an evaluation from any of the, you know, authorities out there, all the universities.
00:00:22.020 Here we go.
00:00:22.480 After evaluating the document, necessity to find a universe, a wave-based mathematical framework.
00:00:25.660 Here's a breakdown.
00:00:26.820 Interesting idea presented.
00:00:27.820 In the paper, introduce a wave-based mathematical framework to argue the universe must be finite.
00:00:31.660 It builds on linchpin geometry, tetrin shapes, and Howard Coma ideas largely associated with Terence Howard.
00:00:38.820 It uses concepts like wave reflection, standing waves, and energy quantization to support those claims.
00:00:43.720 Critical issue, scientific inconsistencies, core mathematical flaw, 1 times 1 equals 2.
00:00:49.020 This claim contradicts fundamental arithmetic and is not accepted in any legitimate mathematical system.
00:00:54.400 Multiplication is defined such as 1 times 1 equals 1.
00:00:59.640 Redefining this without rigorously peer-reviewed mathematical framework makes the rest of the paper logic untenable.
00:01:05.520 Two unverified concepts.
00:01:07.060 Terms like Howard Coma, tetrin shapes, lynchpin geometry are not recognized in mainstream mathematical or physics.
00:01:13.780 These concepts do not appear in peer-reviewed journals.
00:01:16.600 Misapplication of physical laws.
00:01:19.500 The paper refers to wave mechanics, conservation energy, and quantum equations, but applies them in nonstandard or speculative ways.
00:01:27.220 For example, replacing Planck's content with Howard's Coma constant is unsubstantiated and lacks empirical validation.
00:01:34.820 And last but not least, citation issues.
00:01:37.740 The reference include real scientists, Einstein, Planck, alongside fictional or pseudoscientific collaborators, Howard Seeley, Yee, Yee, Yee, Yee, et al.
00:01:48.600 Yeah, et al.
00:01:49.680 There's no known peer-reviewed body of work by these authors.
00:01:53.560 Verdict, not scientifically valid.
00:01:55.740 That's what they would say.
00:01:57.720 Now, if you put in, that's why the stuff that I sent you, I wanted to send, you have to put in the curvilinear thing into AI so it has the full, so it has the full basis in which to evaluate it.
00:02:16.360 Because one of the things that the computers or the AI has been lacking, its foundation is all based off of the Cartesian space, off the one times one equaling one, off of a redundancy inside of a system instead of matching it to a universal conformed system.
00:02:37.860 So if you add in to that, let me see.
00:02:43.600 Doctor, your question for you, do you, from, you know, working with NASA, the government, how often do you guys use, whether it's for papers, credibility, things that you question, how often do you guys use Grok or OpenAI, ChadGBT?
00:02:58.640 We are not allowed.
00:03:00.220 You're not allowed.
00:03:01.280 I believe in use reliability in the, you know, integrity of them.
00:03:07.440 Use this third, you know, use this commercial software that's not really vested, you know, is the accuracy.
00:03:16.860 And so I believe we have to write exactly, use our own research.
00:03:22.480 Wow.
00:03:22.880 So academia scientists, you know, the establishment side, you guys don't touch OpenAI.
00:03:29.960 Oh, let me rephrase this one.
00:03:32.580 Not OpenAI.
00:03:33.940 They have their own AI.
00:03:35.040 Initially, we are not even allowed to install ChadGBT on our government computer.
00:03:41.120 Yes.
00:03:41.660 But however...
00:03:42.500 Why though?
00:03:42.940 What's the reasoning?
00:03:44.060 Is it because they want you to do the work of what it's doing?
00:03:47.120 Or...
00:03:47.420 Because ChadGBT is based on the authority, opinion.
00:03:52.820 It's not really giving you scientific results.
00:03:56.040 It's only based on somebody's results cited.
00:03:59.620 It does not create...
00:04:01.720 So far, it does not create anything new, you know, in terms of solving the mystery in physics.
00:04:10.020 It cannot do that.
00:04:12.140 Can you ask him to please upload all of the papers that I sent to you into the AI so it'll have more than just that one paper?
00:04:24.000 Rob, could you do that?
00:04:24.740 I can do that.
00:04:25.240 It only allows you to upload 10 at a time.
00:04:27.720 That's the biggest problem.
00:04:28.720 Yeah, it's only like 10...
00:04:30.740 How many we got there?
00:04:31.700 Like 10 that we gave you?
00:04:32.620 I think you're more than 10.
00:04:33.620 Yeah, I'm at about 21 different documents.
00:04:36.020 Oh.
00:04:39.140 That's fine.
00:04:39.800 Just do 10 at a time, twice.
00:04:42.780 Just let me finish your results.
00:04:45.560 But after a year or two, and then we do have a new, you know, lead technologist, you know, to mention about it,
00:04:56.120 give us a training on using AI to write, to improve the writing.
00:05:02.040 So I believe now, so we do allow to use casually, but not in scientific writing or something.
00:05:10.880 I believe it still has a restructuring.
00:05:13.660 Amen.
00:05:15.100 I've been...
00:05:15.820 Very interesting.
00:05:16.780 Yeah.
00:05:17.000 All of the stuff that we've been doing, the reason that we were forced to go to the AI route was, like I said, I brought all of the wave conjugations.
00:05:26.920 I brought the actual geometry to people like Eric Weinstein, and they did nothing with it.
00:05:33.920 Instead of evaluating it, I thought he would share it among his friends and talk about it.
00:05:38.680 No, they just said it there, even though it was for grand, super symmetrical systems.
00:05:43.920 Let me ask a question from you, Dr. Yu.
00:05:45.860 When, because the argument was made that peer review, you're not a peer to review it, like you're not a qualified peer to review.
00:05:52.740 Is that how it's seen in your world, where peer review is another person that's a qualified doctor, you know, schooling, and they've done the right thing to look there?
00:06:01.960 Sure, that's the common practice in establishing the physics community, but I believe this is a gatekeeper to silence, to squash, to suppress.
00:06:16.360 Really?
00:06:17.600 Different opinion.
00:06:19.040 Yes.
00:06:19.920 And this is a very convenient tool, say, how many peer review you have, how many sightings you have.
00:06:27.020 If you do not, they very hardly even get you to go through the publication.
00:06:34.080 If you cannot be publicated, right?
00:06:37.100 So how can you get a sighting, get a peer review, right?
00:06:40.880 The only peer review, you submit a paper, they send it to several review board members.
00:06:47.940 You know what they have?
00:06:49.520 If you disagree with their fundamental concept, you said entire quantum mechanics is not true.
00:06:56.180 And even relativity is hypothetical, you know, of course you will not get a daylight from their review.
00:07:07.540 But they want to keep, their entire livelihood is based upon maintaining their current status quo.
00:07:14.360 And they don't want to change that.
00:07:16.380 Like you said, you get your PhDs based upon repeating what they've taught you before.
00:07:21.220 Not by challenging what's been in existence, but by confirming what's in existence.
00:07:26.420 So they don't want to grow.
00:07:28.200 They want to maintain the status quo.
00:07:30.660 And in order for us to grow, we have to keep challenging the clothes we're in, the bed that we fit in, the physical shape we're in.
00:07:39.120 We've got to keep pushing the boundaries.
00:07:41.140 And they've taken that away because they've got profit margins associated with it.
00:07:45.440 And they won't do the reviewing.
00:07:47.740 Do you think that's what's tied to it, doctor?
00:07:49.280 Do you agree with them?
00:07:50.200 That it's because of, is it just the same old, same old, you know, this is how we always do it.
00:07:54.640 You're an outsider.
00:07:55.600 We don't want to give you the credibility.
00:07:57.020 You're not one of us.
00:07:58.320 Is that what you think it is?
00:08:00.120 Perception is, but I have to give credit.
00:08:02.460 There's many of non-conventional theory that have a lot of flaws, very obvious mistakes or typos or flaws, very easily to be picked on.
00:08:16.900 So in that point, I believe we need to have some gatekeepers, some standards, right?
00:08:22.280 But not constrict the new ideas.
00:08:26.340 So I wanted to make a further point.
00:08:31.440 It's very important in the physics community.
00:08:34.080 If a quantum model is not correct, right, we're throughout.
00:08:38.220 So how can we resolve the four fundamental forces in quantum mechanics?
00:08:45.440 The weak force is off.
00:08:47.780 Their interpretation, the strong forces are off.
00:08:50.360 And?
00:08:51.100 The electromagnetism and gravity.
00:08:53.560 Gravity, they could have gotten rid of a long time ago.
00:08:56.340 The gravity issue sits out there and the electromagnetism that they've been trying to bond forever instead of recognizing that they're already one system.
00:09:06.240 But their approach is completely off with it.
00:09:09.460 They see magnets.
00:09:10.480 They don't even see magnetism properly.
00:09:12.680 They don't see it as this expanding centrifugal force.
00:09:15.400 And they don't see electricity as this contracting centripetal force.
00:09:20.740 They see, they don't see the motion of it.
00:09:22.920 But I'll cut you off.
00:09:24.220 I shouldn't have done that.
00:09:24.840 Very good.
00:09:25.280 You know, I want to make sure people understand that without quantum mechanics, we only need one single fundamental force.
00:09:36.400 Which is?
00:09:39.080 Motion.
00:09:40.220 Everything comes down to motion.
00:09:41.480 We're talking about the force right now.
00:09:43.580 The direction.
00:09:46.980 Magnetic force.
00:09:47.780 So now people are often talking about the electromagnetic force.
00:09:52.800 So people confuse about the electrical and the magnetism.
00:09:57.620 I remember you mentioned that maybe on your show or something, electrical and the magnetism.
00:10:05.240 What is your contrast between that?
00:10:07.500 That electricity is always spinning northeast, seeking a higher pressure condition, trying to, spinning to the right, trying to get to the apex and the center of something, centripetally spinning.
00:10:19.840 Then as it gets to the center, it gets pushed out by another electrical part of the wave.
00:10:26.620 And once it gets to the edge of the boundary and no longer has the potential of being trapped in there, now it gets devitalized.
00:10:34.620 And as a result of being devitalized, it's no longer able to spin northeast anymore.
00:10:40.100 Now it's spinning southwest because it's taking on, putting on these things.
00:10:44.860 It becomes magnetism.
00:10:46.040 And it's spinning southwesterly, centrifugally, expanding outward.
00:10:51.060 It's expanding in sixes, whereas before it was contracting in three sets of fives, in three fifths.
00:10:58.060 The contraction happens here.
00:10:59.840 Electricity contracts.
00:11:01.420 Magnetism expands.
00:11:03.740 It's the radiation compared to the so-called gravitative force.
00:11:07.820 That's how I see it.
00:11:08.900 Let me give you my version.
00:11:10.200 Before James Clark Maxwell, they traded electricity and the mechanism completely separately.
00:11:20.940 And what James Clark Maxwell did is unify them as every connection.
00:11:27.740 So if they defined, you know, one of his equations defined electrical field, time varying of magnetic field.
00:11:36.620 Let me explain in my own discovery, please.
00:11:42.800 So so-called electrical, static electrical field.
00:11:46.440 This is a secret in my theory called the UN theory of everything.
00:11:52.660 Static electrical field is exactly magnet field.
00:11:57.960 And dynamic electrical field, that means what time varying of a magnet field.
00:12:02.940 It's when you have a magnet, magnet has a magnetic field, right?
00:12:08.960 Magnet in motion.
00:12:10.820 That's what it's called a time varying.
00:12:13.220 Whenever you have a moving magnetic field, that's called the electric field.
00:12:18.060 That's generally the electricity.
00:12:20.040 And the thing with our universe is they measure things as if it's dead, but everything is in motion.
00:12:27.180 Everything is alive and in motion.
00:12:29.700 There is never anything that's still.
00:12:33.580 And we keep measuring things as if they are dead and still and going to remain in this in this set place when things are not just stuck here.
00:12:43.380 They are always in motion and the motion is always spherical.
00:12:47.540 The motion is never in a straight line.
00:12:49.680 It's always spherical.
00:12:50.620 And if they make that one adjustment and start measuring things based upon the spherical or spiral nature of everything, then all of their measurements would equal up.
00:13:01.740 Then they would have balance in their energy systems.
00:13:05.180 But because they're using straight lines, I'll use this point again.
00:13:07.940 Again, like with a computer chip, 90 per, all of the, you have these 90 degree angles with the computer chip keeps turning, you know, going at the speed of light or just under the speed of light.
00:13:19.460 Hit this 90 degree wall.
00:13:20.900 It has to stop, then build up its energy and go again.
00:13:24.120 Well, that's heat that's built up in each one of these 90 degree turns.
00:13:27.460 Each time that heat builds up, what does it do?
00:13:29.560 It destroys the, it destroys the electrical signal because electricity is balanced off by magnetism.
00:13:36.080 Magnetism creates heat.
00:13:37.880 The heat is those points.
00:13:39.540 Now the signal breaks down.
00:13:41.720 So they keep having to cool the system in comparison to how energy really moves in a circle.
00:13:49.220 Now there's no interference being built up.
00:13:52.920 Now the chip works a lot smoother.
00:13:55.020 But the way they're doing everything, it has this entropy, this unnecessary resistance because of their ideas on straight lines.
00:14:03.880 Hi, everyone.
00:14:04.920 My name is Terrence Howard.
00:14:06.500 I'm an actor, but in the field of science also.
00:14:10.860 So if you would like to connect with me, you can connect with me on MNECT.
00:14:15.640 The QR code is down below.
00:14:18.120 And let's have a great conversation.
00:14:19.860 If you enjoyed this video, you want to watch more videos like this, click here.
00:14:23.760 And if you want to watch the entire podcast, click here.