Valuetainment - May 06, 2026


"Who The Hell Is Wes Moore?" - The 2028 Democratic Frontrunner NOBODY Saw Coming


Episode Stats


Length

15 minutes

Words per minute

184.9

Word count

2,933

Sentence count

207

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Toxicity

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

17

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I sit down with retired Marine Corps Corps Col. David Gergen to discuss the Iran situation and his thoughts on it. We talk about his views on the use of force in Afghanistan, the impact of Midnight Hammer, and what he thinks about the current situation with Iran.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Let me talk to you. As a military guy, Afghanistan, what do you think about what's going on with Iran?
00:00:04.000 I'm actually curious. What's your opinion? Because that's more of a foreign, you know, do you think that could have been prevented?
00:00:09.040 Are you somebody that's saying, you know, you support the president? What is doing? What's your position on that? 1.00
00:00:13.200 It absolutely could have been prevented. And the problem with the. So I have a few different issues with it.
00:00:19.800 One is, for example, I was actually a fan publicly and I know some people got on me about it, about Midnight Hammer.
00:00:25.520 I was like, I think that's a smart operation.
00:00:28.940 I think it was, there was risk analysis.
00:00:32.060 I think there was enough international consensus and coalition about a need to be able to address it.
00:00:38.380 And at least from what we heard from the initial reports, it accomplished the set out established mission, right?
00:00:46.620 I think that's necessary and required for military operations, right?
00:00:51.760 That we're clear about what is the consensus and the goal. 0.67
00:00:53.740 specific for Iran to not have
00:00:55.840 nuclear capabilities. Correct. 0.85
00:00:57.740 For that reason. And I thought Midnight Hammer
00:00:59.600 was the right kind of operation. 1.00
00:01:01.620 With the outcome of eliminating Iran 0.86
00:01:03.580 having nuclear weapons capabilities. 0.96
00:01:05.460 And I think there is a
00:01:08.040 at least I believe, there's a
00:01:09.500 bipartisan consensus of the danger 1.00
00:01:11.400 of the Iranian
00:01:13.480 regime having nuclear weapons. 0.91
00:01:15.860 And I very much fall into
00:01:17.520 that category.
00:01:19.820 I am not
00:01:21.460 confused about the danger that
00:01:23.360 that regime posed to the world. The truth is, probably both for you and myself, we lost people
00:01:29.760 because of the Iranian regime, right? So I'm very clear on that. There's a difference between 0.99
00:01:35.220 Midnight Hammer and what we're doing right now. Because Midnight Hammer, I understood
00:01:39.580 risk calculation and understood like, what was it that we're looking to accomplish? And once the
00:01:46.280 mission accomplishment was laid out, then the operation is complete. No mission creeps.
00:01:51.580 because there's nothing that worries me as a military guy more than mission creep.
00:01:56.820 What is the mission?
00:01:58.080 Know what to accomplish, and then once it's accomplished,
00:02:00.120 if you have something else, that's a secondary operation.
00:02:02.820 This is no mission creeps.
00:02:04.580 With this mission, I feel like there's three things we should know
00:02:08.240 every time you decide to deploy military personnel.
00:02:11.380 One, was military force and kinetic force the last option?
00:02:15.800 Two, what is the end state and the mission that people can understand
00:02:20.700 and that you're able to bring the American people along for it as well
00:02:23.980 because the American people are paying for this.
00:02:25.500 I mean, we saw testimony today indicating that, you know,
00:02:28.880 and this is DOD's numbers,
00:02:31.240 where they're talking about this has cost around $25 billion so far.
00:02:34.240 Have we really explained to the American people
00:02:36.880 what $25 billion has gone towards?
00:02:39.340 And the third thing is that what is the international coalition
00:02:42.820 that you're building around it?
00:02:44.620 Now, I'm not saying there needs to be an international coalition
00:02:47.400 to be able to fight wars because the truth is,
00:02:50.140 the U.S. military is one on one. If the U.S. military is coming after you, there's nothing
00:02:55.640 you can do. We're that good. We're that good, right? We are one of one. However, it takes a
00:03:02.680 coalition not to fight the war, but to build the peace, right? Because one side can start a war.
00:03:08.360 Generally, one side cannot end it. That's where we need to have a sense and a consensus of what
00:03:15.020 this thing is going to look like. You're referencing NATO. Is that a NATO message?
00:03:18.040 No, I think it's past NATO.
00:03:20.920 And first of all, I actually think it starts more with the regional partners, right?
00:03:23.840 Because I think, is NATO going to be important in it?
00:03:26.020 Yeah.
00:03:26.560 But I think NATO also has its hands full in other things.
00:03:29.420 I'm talking about the regional partners.
00:03:31.160 I'm like, are we making sure that we're getting the UAE involved?
00:03:35.620 Are we making sure what has been the conversations with Pakistan?
00:03:38.840 What has been the conversations with Saudi Arabia?
00:03:41.120 What has been the conversations with Egypt and all the other part of Israel?
00:03:45.720 All these other partners that are going to have to be involved in this.
00:03:49.340 And I feel like when you're thinking about all those three criteria, was kinetic operation the last option?
00:03:55.800 Was there a stated end goal and a stated, you know, real mission accomplishment of what this is going to look like?
00:04:00.220 And did you do the work to be able to build out the intercoal coalitions?
00:04:04.720 I think the answer in all three of those is no.
00:04:07.760 And that's what makes me so bothered about where we are right now, where I think there is no one who wants this war to end more.
00:04:15.720 right now than Donald Trump.
00:04:17.420 He wants this over.
00:04:19.400 But again, one side can start a war.
00:04:22.740 Generally, one side can't end it.
00:04:24.380 Did you support what he did with Venezuela?
00:04:26.400 Because I know Midnight Hammer, you said yet.
00:04:27.800 But did you like the way he did Venezuela?
00:04:29.380 In, out, got Maduro, boom, took control.
00:04:32.600 You liked the way he did Venezuela.
00:04:34.000 I think that- 0.96
00:04:34.920 That was like a ridiculous operation, the way they did it. 0.99
00:04:37.820 It was a ridiculous military operation. 0.99
00:04:39.360 Sure. 0.98
00:04:40.180 100%.
00:04:40.540 Yeah.
00:04:40.900 I think the thing that society can't confuse, though,
00:04:44.660 is, again, our military can kind of do anything.
00:04:49.020 While our military can do anything,
00:04:51.260 I don't think our military should do everything.
00:04:54.700 And I would actually put that in the same category, right?
00:04:57.680 Where if you say, listen, the job is to go take out Maduro
00:05:01.760 and the job is to make sure that you are securing the capital
00:05:07.060 and the jobs, our military can do that all day long
00:05:09.620 and twice on Sundays.
00:05:11.100 But what becomes the larger conversation
00:05:14.060 that is then being had about basic measurements of stability,
00:05:17.980 about what does this thing look like in six months, in 12 months, in 18 months?
00:05:21.980 And if the answer is simply that, well, you're still looking at the same type of abuses
00:05:27.800 and maybe what now we've gotten some more barrels of oil out of it,
00:05:31.380 is that worth that potential risk and cost analysis?
00:05:35.040 Got it.
00:05:35.320 And that's the thing that I don't know.
00:05:36.300 Oh, buddy, if you think about, like, go to the other side of the argument,
00:05:41.040 because I do think there's a lot of uncertainty with this.
00:05:43.000 fair enough that's that's not undisputable the 13 lives cost you know 25 billion dollars i even
00:05:48.220 think it's more than 25 billion but let's just say low numbers 25 i thought it's like 51 billion but
00:05:51.720 let's say 50 because that's probably yeah so uh uh if i think about the way he did it
00:05:58.940 so he whispers greenland people lose their minds okay why did he say greenland well we need the
00:06:05.040 resources from there because of china okay so he goes gets venezuela and he's doing all the boats
00:06:09.840 and everyone's getting upset, and all of a sudden, boom, we got Maduro.
00:06:12.940 So then, suddenly, Venezuela's part of OPEC.
00:06:16.320 We're not part of OPEC.
00:06:17.240 Venezuela's, I think, their number seven for the most production out of everybody.
00:06:20.760 And then he gets the Panamanian president to tell China, C.K. Hutchinson,
00:06:28.120 get these ports out.
00:06:29.080 You have no longer jurisdiction here.
00:06:31.340 So you mean to tell me they no longer?
00:06:33.080 No, they don't.
00:06:33.580 China, that's massive, so that's two.
00:06:35.320 So now China cannot bully us with Panama Canal, and China needs Venezuela.
00:06:41.220 Now Venezuela is under control of U.S. pretty much, if you think about it.
00:06:44.100 The VP reports to him, and he goes and does this to Iran.
00:06:48.180 If he's able to pull this off, we're now with the blockade.
00:06:52.000 Every day Iran is bleeding $450 million, $12 to $13 billion per month.
00:06:56.740 One million jobs lost directly, another million lost indirectly.
00:07:00.580 Food prices 67% up year over year.
00:07:03.520 They're getting destroyed.
00:07:04.380 All the people that have been gone, the leader when I met with Putin a couple days ago, taking a picture together, a conversation, make sure Putin's like, I got your back.
00:07:12.380 If he's able to get the IRGC to be gone, where now Gulf states are supporting what he's doing, UAE now left OPEC.
00:07:22.560 You better believe UAE's got a relationship with Trump that they're talking offline and saying, hey, don't worry about it.
00:07:26.500 I'm going to get you a bunch of business. Leave it. You're going to be fine.
00:07:28.880 OPEC is now sitting there
00:07:31.180 because OPEC is Iran, Iraq, all these other guys 0.58
00:07:33.280 because number one is Saudi, number two is
00:07:34.940 Iraq, three is, used to be Iran
00:07:36.960 now it's UAE and four is I think Iran
00:07:39.260 If he's able to get this thing done 0.97
00:07:42.800 and get rid of IRGC, let's say in the next 0.79
00:07:45.180 six weeks, story drops
00:07:47.180 IRGC is gone
00:07:48.880 they signed a 20 year no
00:07:50.700 nuclear capabilities, they're doing nothing
00:07:52.940 and we
00:07:54.700 have partners where nobody can
00:07:57.100 come and do anything with us
00:07:58.040 in the Strait of Hormuz.
00:07:59.780 We're good to go.
00:08:00.820 Now we just shipped 910,000 barrels to Japan
00:08:05.020 that just arrived today or a couple days ago.
00:08:07.340 So now people are ordering from us.
00:08:10.300 And China's sitting there saying,
00:08:11.500 wait a minute, I can't get my oil out of Iran,
00:08:13.360 Strait of Hormuz.
00:08:14.000 I can't get oil from Venezuela.
00:08:16.200 I can't, wait a minute, I'm cornered now.
00:08:19.220 Don't you, would you be able to comfortably
00:08:21.160 give them the credit on this if that ends up happening?
00:08:24.740 If, it's a big if.
00:08:25.960 Five to 10% chance of that happening.
00:08:27.500 But if it happens, I actually don't think it's five to 10 percent.
00:08:30.940 I think it's lower than that.
00:08:31.920 OK.
00:08:32.300 However, of course.
00:08:33.680 OK.
00:08:34.260 Listen, if all of those variables are in place, then that would be extraordinary.
00:08:42.260 But here is but here's what we know right now is right now we have a total blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which is having very real consequences.
00:08:53.600 And again, not just in the United States.
00:08:55.820 I mean, people say, yeah, it's having huge impact on gas prices in the U.S.
00:08:58.860 Yes, I mean, gas prices, what's over, $420 now on national average.
00:09:02.760 But that's just the U.S.
00:09:05.260 This is having huge international implications.
00:09:08.180 It is.
00:09:08.480 Right?
00:09:08.900 That we still have military personnel that are being deployed to include my old unit,
00:09:13.720 and I believe to include the 101st as well.
00:09:16.000 And people have to remember, that's not free.
00:09:18.820 Like, every time our units move, the American people are paying for this.
00:09:22.940 But these Gulf states want IRGC to be gone.
00:09:25.380 100%.
00:09:25.860 If we're able to do that.
00:09:27.740 Yes.
00:09:28.140 That's massive.
00:09:29.120 But we also know that we're talking about a regime that at the start of the year, right,
00:09:33.660 when we had an uprising and there were, what, 20, 25,000 people that this regime just mowed down and massacred.
00:09:44.580 What we haven't seen in the past 60, 70 days is the same type of uprising.
00:09:50.480 We haven't seen it.
00:09:51.660 Well, the Internet is still not there, so we still can't see anything.
00:09:53.960 They don't know what's going on.
00:09:55.180 Fair.
00:09:55.600 But we haven't seen that same, and you're right, the Internet's not there,
00:10:00.020 so we'd so, but, and I don't know if you believe that that energy is happening right now.
00:10:04.620 The uprising internally?
00:10:06.180 Sorry, internally, yes.
00:10:07.100 No, they have, the challenge they have with that, which is to give you credit on the argument,
00:10:12.060 is they thought the military would flip on them and decide to go and say,
00:10:18.840 look, I'm not with you, IRGC, whatever you guys are doing, I'm out.
00:10:21.060 That hasn't happened yet. 0.99
00:10:22.020 And the weapons that we try to give the Kurds, they kept it. 0.98
00:10:25.100 It never went to the people. 1.00
00:10:26.580 So that part, I agree that that part.
00:10:29.800 And then Reza Pallavi is doing a pretty good job, you know, going out there speaking.
00:10:34.240 He's going viral.
00:10:35.040 But quite frankly, mobilizing military hasn't happened.
00:10:39.020 The people have come out.
00:10:39.900 The people have come out for a lot of things.
00:10:42.180 But the mobilizing part with the military side hasn't happened.
00:10:44.940 And unfortunately, you know, as we find in these situations, the guys with the guns generally have the bigger voice.
00:10:51.400 You're right.
00:10:52.020 And that's the issue that we're facing right now is that, you know, when people talk about, well, what is going to be the regime change?
00:11:00.060 For me, regime change is less about personnel.
00:11:03.020 It's more about ideology, right?
00:11:05.160 It's like you could have a regime change of people, but do conditions change for the people?
00:11:13.960 And listen, take other examples.
00:11:17.120 Take Cuba, right?
00:11:20.480 Take the Cuban example after Fidel died, right?
00:11:23.800 Fidel died.
00:11:24.660 Raul takes over.
00:11:26.020 That's a regime change.
00:11:27.700 What was it?
00:11:28.900 And I think we have to really think critically about what that means and about what the goal then becomes and what it looks like.
00:11:36.200 Because the same type of energy that we were seeing at the start of the year when it comes to people really uprising, and that's when I think there was a hope for people that the United States and others would come up and support that.
00:11:47.760 and tens of thousands of people were killed.
00:11:52.560 So that same energy is not there right now,
00:11:55.520 which is not providing any forms of incentive
00:11:58.360 for a regime change in its real meaning
00:12:01.960 to actually exist right now for the RGC.
00:12:04.500 Very low.
00:12:05.280 I'm saying 5% to 10%.
00:12:06.460 You're saying lower.
00:12:07.340 You're probably right that the chances are slim.
00:12:10.220 But that's even more of a thing that if he does pull it off,
00:12:13.160 I am so curious to know how the critics are going to come out
00:12:16.000 and say, Mr. President, credit to you for pulling it off.
00:12:19.180 I'm curious to know what's going to happen there.
00:12:20.820 Will you hear me right now?
00:12:21.580 Yeah, no, I respect that.
00:12:22.540 And I don't put you as a critic.
00:12:24.580 I actually think you're a reasonable player.
00:12:26.480 I'm talking about the guys that there's nothing that anybody can do right.
00:12:29.260 You're not in that state.
00:12:30.560 You're a fairly reasonable guy.
00:12:32.100 Now, I will say one thing, though.
00:12:33.340 I still think, though, that there needs to be a bigger conversation in Congress
00:12:37.380 about how they are looking at war powers.
00:12:40.120 Because, and again, to be clear, this is not a Trump thing.
00:12:43.660 Our last official war is World War II.
00:12:46.000 So you're trying to tell me the United States has not been in conflicts since World War II?
00:12:50.140 We've been in conflicts every year since World War II.
00:12:54.200 But the president has the flexibility to be able to do it.
00:12:57.080 Now, do I think there needs to be a bigger—do I think a president needs flexibility?
00:13:00.760 Because a president is dealing with more information than anyone in Congress.
00:13:05.100 Yes.
00:13:05.540 And definitely more than any of us, right?
00:13:07.540 Yeah. 0.66
00:13:07.740 So a president needs to have a measure of flexibility.
00:13:09.520 I want him to have it.
00:13:10.680 I want him to have it.
00:13:11.060 I want him to, right?
00:13:12.140 And that's why elections matter.
00:13:14.300 Have consequences, yeah.
00:13:15.080 However, when we're talking about large-scale, long-term conflicts, for there not to be an ability for other bodies to have a say as to what's going on, the fact that we were in Afghanistan for 20 years and never had to go and explain what was happening in Afghanistan.
00:13:38.320 And, again, I think about this from a very personal perspective.
00:13:41.200 We were there for 20 years, spent over $2.4 trillion, lost over 2,400 service people, and never had qualified as a war.
00:14:00.100 Say that to the families of over 2,400 people.
00:14:03.600 Say that to the fact that our treasury lost over $2 trillion.
00:14:07.580 So there's got to be, there has to be a different type of conversation about where does jurisdictional prudence for a commander-in-chief start?
00:14:18.660 And when does authorizing ability for presidents of the United States begin?
00:14:23.960 Because I do think those things have gotten very, very muddied over the years.
00:14:27.600 And again, this is not a Democratic-
00:14:29.120 That's a left-right center decision.
00:14:30.120 By the way, you have the support with that message of a lot of people who are with you on that.
00:14:36.100 You wasted wars, money for no reason, weapons of mass destruction, all this stuff that we fell for.
00:14:41.820 You've got a guy over there, Vincent Oshana, that's probably listened to this podcast.
00:14:44.800 If he hasn't already left, he's sitting down right now.
00:14:47.000 He was in the Air Force.
00:14:47.820 He was the airman of the year in the Air Force right there.
00:14:49.420 He's looking at the glasses, him right there. 0.97
00:14:51.440 He, for that specific reason, Afghanistan wasted time. 1.00
00:14:54.740 He's like, dude, I can't even support that.
00:14:56.480 So he's conflicted.
00:14:58.100 Yeah.
00:14:58.400 And he's a Trump supporter.
00:14:59.360 He's conflicted.
00:15:00.100 Like, look, what are we doing here?
00:15:01.000 So I don't think you're alone there.
00:15:02.020 when we set out to create a shoe that blends comfort function and luxury we had the choice
00:15:08.420 to make it fast we had the choice to make it cheap we chose neither instead we chose tuscanero
00:15:15.860 we chose true italian craftsmanship each pair touched by 50 skilled hands we chose patience
00:15:22.580 spending two years perfecting every detail and we chose the finest quality at every step introducing
00:15:29.300 the Future Looks Bright collection.
00:15:32.340 Not rushed, not disposable, not ordinary.
00:15:36.620 Rather intentional, luxurious, timeless.
00:15:45.920 If you enjoyed this video,
00:15:47.220 you want to watch more videos like this, click here.
00:15:48.980 And if you want to watch the entire podcast, click here.