00:10:29.980If you send $50 billion in there, they can spend other money to fund the terror attacks.
00:10:35.100And by the way, the some $40 billion that is from oil sales, that is completely available to be spent.
00:10:45.520And in a very real and direct sense, it funded this attack, as did the money that the Biden administration sent to Gaza, that they stated in writing they knew would go to Hamas for terrorism.
00:11:01.460Well, congratulations to the Biden White House.
00:13:35.620But students who are gathering to support the Palestinians, to support Hamas, frankly.
00:13:40.200Very, very, very specifically to support Hamas and what's happening.
00:13:45.140What is the role of the president of a university, or frankly, the president of a company, when they have either students or employees or others who want to view and express that position?
00:14:37.200And then, number two, the president of Harvard, like the president of UPenn, like the president of any of his institutions, needs to stand up and speak out and say, this is disgraceful and wrong.
00:17:28.440I got to say, listen, I'm an alumnus of Harvard Law School.
00:17:32.780It is embarrassing that our universities, the problem is they become petri dishes.
00:17:39.920They become incubators for radical left-wing views.
00:17:43.300And other than a Hamas headquarters, there are few places with more vicious anti-Semitism and hatred of Israel than America's elite universities today.
00:17:56.780You talk to Hillel students, you talk to Jewish students on campuses, they're afraid.
00:18:04.760They're afraid to be publicly identified as Jewish because they risk violence.
00:18:08.800They risk swastikas being spray-painted on their student center.
00:18:14.420They risk attacks from the radical left.
00:18:18.900And the radical left, more and more, embraces, cherishes, and nurtures anti-Semitism.
00:18:27.060And schools like Harvard, sadly, are the breeding grounds for this hatred.
00:18:31.940And they can't figure it out enough to say genocide is bad.
00:18:36.880That should not be a controversial proposition.
00:18:40.520Well, and even members in Congress, Rashid Tlaib, was asked directly to her face what she thought about women being raped and babies getting their heads cut off.
00:20:14.460And I got to say, if you haven't seen the video of that clip, you ought to Google it and watch it.
00:20:21.900Because watching the video is even more disturbing.
00:20:24.700So Congresswoman Tlaib is walking down the hallways in Congress.
00:20:29.140So the steps you hear the whole time are she's walking, she's walking, she's walking.
00:20:32.820And this reporter just asked her, do you not have a comment on chopping babies' heads off?
00:20:37.360How hard is it for a Congresswoman to say, we should not chop the heads off babies, we should not burn children alive, we should not rape women in the streets?
00:20:47.600That is not, in a normal, sane world, a controversial proposition.
00:20:52.740And yet, her politics are so radical, she cannot bring herself to say that.
00:21:00.100She has in front of her office, she has a Palestinian flag.
00:21:03.380It's interesting, she has a Palestinian flag and she has a transgender flag, which is ironic because Hamas would murder anyone who's gay or transgender.
00:21:10.200So, like, the two flags are utterly in conflict, but in today's modern left, that nobody bothers with intellectual coherence.
00:21:18.960They embrace their ideology and don't worry about it.
00:21:56.460It is the hard left of the Democrat Party.
00:22:00.640And by the way, it's the Biden State Department whose response initially to this was,
00:22:05.980Israel stand down, do not engage in any military action, following the worst attack on Israel in 50 years, following Israel's 9-11, do nothing.
00:22:17.620That is, sadly, the view of today's radical left.
00:22:22.620And for the Democrats who don't agree with it, I hope that they find the courage to call out the members of their own party that are saying things that are disgraceful.
00:22:33.240As before, if you want to hear the rest of this conversation on this topic, you can go back and download the podcast from earlier this week to hear the entire thing.
00:22:42.340Canadian women are looking for more, more out of themselves, their businesses, their elected leaders, and the world around them.
00:22:49.700And that's why we're thrilled to introduce the Honest Talk podcast.
00:24:50.640And it's worth going back and explaining why I did that, because we had talked on the podcast previously that I intended to stay out of the House leadership election.
00:24:59.980And that's what I've done the 11 years I've been in the Senate.
00:25:02.600I've stayed out of every House leadership election we've ever had.
00:25:05.800And my standard position has been that questions of House leadership are for the House members to decide.
00:25:12.480And that's what I had said on the podcast repeatedly.
00:25:15.900I'd said it to reporters in Capitol Hill repeatedly.
00:25:18.900That was a position I was very comfortable with.
00:25:21.340And then a couple of days ago, Jim Jordan called me, and he made a very direct ask.
00:25:37.640We had him on two consecutive episodes doing a deep dive into the fantastic work that he's doing as focusing on the weaponization of the Department of Justice and the FBI and government.
00:25:51.320And Jim is someone I've worked with the entire time I've been in the Senate.
00:25:57.540And he asked for my support, and he leaned in hard on it.
00:26:02.500And I thought about it, and I thought carefully.
00:26:04.860And my general philosophy on political endorsements, and I make endorsements all over the country, in Senate races, in House races, in gubernatorial races, in school board races, all sorts of races,
00:26:17.440is that I support the strongest conservative who can win, and both of those are important.
00:26:26.960I want a proven record that you're a real conservative, and I want a path to victory.
00:26:31.100I'm not interested in tilting at windmills.
00:26:32.800I'm not interested in a candidate that does not have a path to victory.
00:26:36.900And as I thought about it, I came to the conclusion that Jim was that person, that he would be certainly the most conservative speaker we'd ever had,
00:26:48.000but that he had a real and viable path to win, that he had real and meaningful support.
00:26:52.300Now, obviously, his chief rival and the only two declared candidates at the time for speaker were Jim Jordan and Steve Scalise.
00:27:23.720Steve is obviously hurting, but I think he's also trying to do the right thing.
00:27:29.240And I'll tell you, before I endorsed Jim Jordan, when I hung up the phone with Jim, before I put out the endorsement, I picked up the phone and I called Steve.
00:27:39.900And the first thing I did is just ask Steve how he was doing health-wise.
00:27:45.540He's dealing with a rare form of blood cancer.
00:27:48.020And I've been concerned and praying for him.
00:27:51.380And he told me he is doing better and the treatment is proceeding very well.
00:27:56.120But I gave him the heads up just man-to-man.
00:27:59.240I said, listen, you're my friend, Steve.
00:28:01.540I'm going to make this endorsement of Jim.
00:28:09.920But I told Steve at the time, and I believe this, I said, listen, I think you'd make a terrific speaker.
00:28:14.200And I think Jim would make a terrific speaker.
00:28:16.700So do not take this endorsement as a negative comment on you, but rather just a statement of that I think Jim Jordan is the strongest conservative who has a path to win.
00:28:30.960And Steve was very gracious about it and we're friends.
00:28:33.900And I certainly anticipate continuing to work with Steve in the years ahead.
00:28:38.080Now, what happened this week is the House Republican Conference met and they had a closed-door meeting and they had a vote.
00:28:46.640And Scalise won the vote by a vote of 113 to 99.
00:29:01.160And what happened subsequently is there were a number of House Republicans who did not vote for Scalise who said over the hours and days that followed that they were not going to vote for Scalise.
00:30:54.120And it is possible, if Scalise doesn't have the votes and if Jordan doesn't have the votes, that someone else will emerge as a third option that is some sort of compromise candidate.
00:31:07.680And there are a couple of names that are floating around, but it's not clear at this point what will happen.
00:31:19.380But I will say to anyone concerned, we will have a speaker of the House.