00:02:21.120Next up, another judge has decided to step in and say that, no, you cannot check and see if someone is an illegal immigrant before they vote.
00:02:30.060So what was behind this Obama-appointed judge?
00:14:21.260I plan to be flying in an F-5 fighter jet painted in Freedom 250 colors along with four other fighter jets flying over the nation's capital.
00:14:29.280The story of the National Anthem and the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.
00:14:35.080Join me and let's celebrate America's 250.
00:14:38.400Listen to Newt's World on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:14:45.460Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on demand?
00:17:39.560I want to get to this before we run out of time.1.00
00:17:41.800And that is election database and this activist judge explain this this this judge what she has done here in a simplistic way.1.00
00:17:52.680What they were trying to do is make sure that people that were not American citizens and those are not eligible to vote would not be able to eligible to vote.
00:18:00.580That doesn't seem controversial. The majority of Americans are in favor of the Save Act.
00:18:04.780It's 75, 80 percent, depending on what poll you look at.
00:18:07.500And this judge said, hey, you guys can't cross-check in different groups like Social Security, can't work with others, and you guys know we're not going to allow this to happen.
00:18:18.380Yeah, so I'm going to read from the Associated Press.
00:18:21.580A federal judge on Monday ruled that a recently revamped version of a federal tool central to the Trump administration's effort to nationalize elections can no longer be used.
00:18:31.380U.S. District Court Judge Sparkle L. Suknanan.
00:19:14.500All in all, the federal government has knowingly trampled
00:19:17.460on the privacy rights of American citizens
00:19:19.340in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote.
00:19:23.980Sukunen said in an order explaining the decision.
00:19:27.780This court cannot stand idly by while that happens.
00:19:31.160She says Congress had expressly prohibited the government from centralizing Americans' personal identifying information, and the federal agencies that created the SABE program, quote, knew that the database violates these statutory protections.
00:19:43.180Now, this is a liberal activist decision. It is also a decision that doesn't make sense under the statute.
00:19:54.840the statutes that she was looking at number one the statute is the social security act
00:20:02.220and the social security act requires quote social security account numbers of record
00:20:07.820that are obtained or maintained by persons pursuant to any provision of law
00:20:11.540shall be confidential and no authorized person shall disclose any such social security account
00:20:17.020number or related record well you know what trump administration didn't disclose anyone's
00:20:21.160security number that that exactly if they released you know your social security number
00:20:27.660that would be a violation of the social security act they didn't do that social security act doesn't
00:20:34.440say the federal government can't look at social security numbers like the government is one
00:20:38.480entity and it is a bizarre system that says you have records that show if people are illegal
00:20:46.180aliens are not you the federal government are not allowed to look at those records because a law
00:20:51.620says you can't publicly disclose them to others they didn't there's another there's another law
00:20:56.840called the privacy act and the privacy act they claim uh it violated this as well but again the
00:21:05.380privacy act uh does not prohibit the federal government from looking at its own records i
00:21:12.100I mean, understand this is a ruling from a radical judge who's saying even though the federal government and initially the save database was set up to stop the federal government from giving government benefits, giving welfare to illegal aliens.
00:21:28.600Now, mind you, it is illegal to give government benefits, to give welfare to illegal aliens.
00:21:34.020Congress has passed that law over and over and over again.
00:21:37.840And Democrats, when they're being completely split personality on this, they will say repeatedly, well, we don't give welfare benefits to illegal aliens.
00:25:59.840I plan to be flying in an F-5 fighter jet painted in Freedom 250 colors along with four other fighter jets flying over the nation's capital.
00:26:07.840The story of the National Anthem and the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.
00:26:13.640Join me and let's celebrate America's 250.
00:26:16.960Listen to Newt's World on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:26:24.020Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on demand?
00:27:32.880We'll also travel back to 1926 to witness Richard Byrd's historic flight over the North Pole.
00:27:39.880These are more than just stories of combat.
00:27:42.720They are testaments to leadership, community, and the human spirit.
00:27:47.200Listen to Medal of Honor on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:27:54.400I want to get back to the big story number three of the week you may have missed.
00:27:58.840All right, if you just joined us, we're talking about the Supreme Court,
00:28:01.500and we just talked about the Second Amendment case, a big victory over Hawaii there.
00:28:05.840But the Supreme Court also handed President Trump two major immigration victories,
00:28:11.320and this was an exciting moment when it comes to immigration cases and victories that we needed.
00:28:15.840Well, that's right. 6-3, the Supreme Court, there were two big wins.
00:28:19.980One case was Mullen versus Doe, and the other case was Mullen versus Al Otro Lado,
00:28:25.240which is Spanish for on the other side.
00:28:27.420and in both instances it was 6-3 both instances justice alito wrote the opinion so all three of
00:28:34.320these opinions were written by justice alito he had an incredibly strong week defending our rights
00:28:39.200one of the cases the mullen versus al otro lado what it what it concluded is that an illegal
00:28:46.720immigrant on the other side of the border in mexico has not entered into the united states
00:28:53.260for purposes of immigration law. And the Biden administration had adopted a policy where they
00:29:00.100treated illegal immigrants who weren't in the country as if they were in the country,
00:29:05.120and that they had a right to all sorts of processes before they come into the country.
00:29:10.960Now, remember, starting in the first Trump term, President Trump implemented what was called the
00:29:15.940Remain in Mexico policy, which dramatically reduced illegal immigration in the first Trump term,
00:29:20.580And that was preventing illegal immigrants from coming to this country in the first place. And this was an effort to to ignore the plain language of the of the immigration laws.
00:29:34.940And I led an amicus brief, amicus curiae is Latin for friend of the court, and I led an amicus brief that was joined by five members of Congress supporting the Trump administration's policy of stopping immigrants, illegal immigrants, stopping them from coming into the country.0.54
00:29:52.880And the Supreme Court agreed with my brief, agreed with with the Trump Department of Justice, handed down that victory.
00:29:59.660And then the other case, which which is Mullen versus Doe, the court concluded that that temporary protected status,
00:30:09.280which which the Biden administration had awarded to hundreds of thousands of Haitians and Syrians,
00:30:15.800that that president trump could reverse that that it wasn't a permanent grant of amnesty
00:30:23.740that decision likewise was was hugely important for the successes i mean remember in this second
00:30:29.860trump term we have seen illegal border crossings drop 99 that's a staggering victory and the
00:30:36.980supreme court upheld the the president's ability to continue to continue enforcing the law
00:30:40.960yeah it really is and and i want people just to hear shannon bernie said this on fox news channel
00:30:47.880about this i want to take a listen here's how she described it in front of the supreme court
00:30:52.260shin and syrian refugees who were here in the country and basically what the court has said
00:30:57.460is that um they can't challenge this decision by the department of homeland security by the
00:31:03.080administration that they're the ones who get to make the assessment about whether they leave or
00:31:07.100not. I haven't read the whole thing, but they do get into some of the claims that by some of those
00:31:11.380who are advocating for the Haitian refugees that there was some kind of racial animus. The court
00:31:16.140says they don't see evidence of that. So I'll keep reading, but it's another very fractured
00:31:21.020decision that seems to be a win for the Trump administration, which would be the second win for
00:31:24.920them on immigration. That earlier decision that we talked about that came out just a few minutes
00:31:28.960ago saying that if you get to the Mexico border, but you don't make it onto U.S. soil, you can't
00:31:33.840file an asylum claim. So the Trump administration has to be happy about what they've gotten today.
00:31:38.760We've still got eight opinions left, and it looks like Monday will be.
00:31:42.780So you hear her talk about this ruling in favor of Trump. This is another example of doing the
00:31:47.580right thing may be tough. You may go to the Supreme Court, but you're going to win in this
00:31:50.760scenario. And by the way, both of these decisions were 6-3, which means that the liberals on the
00:31:55.780court, they don't care what the statutory language says. They just, just like in the
00:32:01.080second amendment case where they would effectively read the second amendment out of the bill of
00:32:04.900rights uh when it comes to illegal immigration they would read out the ability to secure our
00:32:10.140border uh and they would try instead embody the open border policies we saw during the
00:32:15.380administration compare how shannon bream covered it on fox compare this to to ms now which is i
00:32:22.540guess what they're calling msnbc now i i don't even know that anyone watches the the show but
00:32:27.280But listen to the lefties on MSNOW losing their minds.