00:02:09.700So a whole bunch of Democrats voted for Ratcliffe, and yet the Democrats are trying to drag it out and delay it.
00:02:15.500We're now on Pete Hegseth, and the Democrats really, really, really want to defeat Pete Hegseth.
00:02:21.600So they're just – the tool that the opposition party has in the Senate is they can delay.
00:02:27.280They can – for major cabinet nominees, the rules require 30 hours, and so you can drag it out.
00:02:34.040And so what the Republican majority is doing, we're saying, fine, if you're going to drag it out, then we're not going home.
00:02:39.500We're going to stay here under the 30 hours.
00:02:42.460We're going to vote on Pete Hegseth, I think, at 9 p.m. Friday night.
00:02:46.700And then we're immediately going to move to Kristi Noem, and if they want, we'll take another 30 hours, and then we'll vote on Sunday.
00:02:54.020And we're going to move forward, and we're going to move forward.
00:02:56.640And to be honest, this is not that unusual of a battle.
00:03:00.280You see the opposition party trying to drag things out, and the way you basically break that opposition is, listen, the Democrats want to get home.
00:04:03.960Lisa Murkowski voted no, which wasn't a terribly big surprise.
00:04:07.760They were the two most likely to vote no.
00:04:09.800But the nice thing about having a 53-vote majority is we could actually lose three votes and still get them confirmed because at 50-50, J.D. Vance, as the vice president, would break the tie.
00:04:22.500And so if Susan and Lisa vote no, that doesn't alter the result.
00:04:27.000And so I fully expect that by tomorrow night, Pete Hegseth will be confirmed as defense secretary.
00:04:35.440Actually, earlier today, I chaired the Senate Commerce Committee, and we voted out Sean Duffy, who is the nominee to be transportation secretary.
00:04:45.960And the vote on Sean Duffy was unanimous.
00:04:49.160So every Republican, every Democrat voted for him.
00:04:52.520The Democrats were chattering a little bit that they might oppose him because they were mad that Trump had halted the Green New Deal funding.
00:05:00.560But at the end of the day, when we came to the vote, when they did the roll call, everyone voted no.
00:05:05.520And I sort of – I sit next to John Thune on the Commerce Committee.
00:05:08.580I leaned over to Thune and said, huh, turns out even the Democrats want roads and bridges in their states.
00:05:30.000He's going to do a terrific job as secretary of transportation.
00:05:33.500And that historically is a fairly nonpartisan job.
00:05:37.820When it comes to transportation and infrastructure, every state cares about it.
00:05:43.160If you're doing it right, you should be doing it fairly based on needs, so you shouldn't be favoring your buddies and punishing your enemies.
00:05:51.140And I think Sean will implement the law fairly, and that's one thing every senator does is you go advocate for your state.
00:05:58.160And, look, when it comes to the state of Texas, we have enormous infrastructure needs because we're growing like crazy.
00:06:06.500When I was elected 13 years ago, there were 26 million Texans.
00:06:12.640Today, there are more than 31 million Texans.
00:06:15.680We've added 5 million Texans in just 13 years.
00:06:18.160That is enormous, and that means we've got huge transportation needs because when you add 5 million people, that's a lot more people on cars, that's a lot more people on trucks, that's a lot more people, a lot more cargo being shipped on trains, that's a lot more need for bridges.
00:06:35.220That's a lot more ships coming in and out of our ports.
00:06:38.140And so I think Sean Duffy is going to do a terrific job.
00:06:42.560And I will say also it is very good for the state of Texas that I'm the chairman of the Commerce Committee because I will say it does not hurt if you are advocating for your state if you happen to be the chairman of the committee that has oversight over the Department of Transportation.
00:06:57.540And so that for the state of Texas is a good thing.
00:07:42.720And Hegseth in particular, they're in a frenzy over.
00:07:46.700And so, listen, you can understand if you're a Democrat, your base is all mad and thinks Hegseth is is some radical that you got to show you're fighting.
00:07:54.840And so they want to go prove to their base.
00:08:26.920You know, it was interesting right at the beginning, actually, before Trump was sworn in, one of the senior members of his inner circle called me and said, look, Ted, we want to move super fast.
00:08:37.340We want to get every cabinet nominee confirmed on January 20th.
00:08:42.240And I kind of laughed and said, well, well, look, I understand you want that, that that's not going to happen.
00:09:17.040And so they're going to use procedural mechanisms to delay confirmation.
00:09:21.320And to be fair, when Biden and Obama were president, Republicans used procedural mechanisms to delay confirmation, particularly if it's a bad nominee.
00:09:29.340If it's a nominee, you know, you're not that concerned about.
00:09:32.820But if it's a nominee that you think is a terrible nominee, you'll do everything you can to fight back.
00:09:37.900Now, the way the majority exercises leverage is it's literally about inflicting pain.
00:09:43.380It's at some point one of the things we can do.
00:09:46.300So the 30 hours delay that you have on a cabinet nominee under the rules is actually broken down into each senator has up to an hour to speak.
00:09:58.100And so you can do what's called call the question, which is you can say, OK, go speak for 30 hours.
00:10:04.640You've got to get 30 senators up there to speak an hour each.
00:10:07.160No senator can speak for more than an hour for filling that time.
00:10:10.500And once you run out of senators, you can call the question.
00:10:12.780So for the next 30 hours, you're telling me that on the hour you're going to have another Democratic senator speak now to keep this going?
00:10:21.820No, because I don't expect we're immediately going to call the question.
00:10:27.060And the reason is they have a procedural tool to fight back.
00:10:31.060So if you call the question the way a Democrat or anyone in the minority fights back, it stands up and suggests the absence of a quorum.
00:10:40.320And under the Senate rules, if if a senator suggests the absence of a quorum, you have to confirm that there is a quorum on the floor of the Senate, which means let's say we're doing this at two in the morning.
00:10:51.680We got to produce 50 senators. And listen, a lot of my colleagues are in their 80s.
00:10:57.380And so getting octogenarians to appear in an instant.
00:11:01.540They're not out smoking cigars with you and Nulls. Is that what you're saying?
00:11:05.680I think that would be correct. And so, look, the Senate rules are built for there to be checks and balances and give and take.
00:11:12.220And so if the Democrats continue to be deeply obstructionist, at some point, I fully expect we will call the question.
00:11:22.780And I wouldn't be surprised if in the next couple of weeks you see Republicans showing up saying we're going to be here all night.
00:11:29.800We're going to have some cots. We're going to sleep on the floor of the Senate.
00:11:32.860And we're going to grind through until you guys stop this nonsense.
00:11:35.620But I think we're not doing that yet. But to be honest, staying through the weekend, no senator likes that.
00:11:43.080Listen, I want to be home with my girls. I want to be back in Texas.
00:11:45.600I don't like being in the frozen tundra that is Washington on Saturday and Sunday when I could be in Texas with my two girls and with my wife.
00:11:54.460And that's your leverage. I mean, that's really it. That's the leverage.
00:12:00.100And I promise you, the Democrat senators are complaining to their leadership.
00:12:05.860We don't want to be here. Why are we stuck here? We don't we don't want to have to be here.
00:12:10.500And it's like, well, you guys can go home right now if you agree.
00:12:14.280All right. We'll confirm all the people. Same time frame. We'll just collapse the time.
00:12:18.580OK, if you do that, we go home. But like if we move expeditiously through these, you can go home.
00:12:25.520And if you want to just be obstructionist, then you're going to be stuck here and it's going to get a really stink.
00:12:31.500And you're going to have to show up in the middle of the night to cast votes.
00:12:34.620And that that annoys everybody, but especially folks who are are pretty old.
00:12:39.900And and so that back and forth. And I actually think post takes that like I was meeting with a Democrat senator today.
00:12:46.180And I asked her, I said, so are you guys going to relent at some point?
00:12:50.540Are we going to be able to go home and just reach an agreement to move these guys forward?
00:12:54.480And she said, oh, no, no, no, because on Hegseth, we think we may get a couple of Republicans to flip.
00:13:00.700And I'm like, yeah, that's not going to happen. Like, OK, you know, you got two, but you need four and you're not getting four.
00:13:07.640And she's like, well, maybe the 51 that voted, maybe they'll change their mind by the time we vote in 30 hours.
00:13:13.120I'm like, yeah, OK, you know, and maybe the moon's made of green cheese that that's all right.
00:13:18.140But but I think the Democrats right now are telling themselves they're holding out hope for that, which means they'll at least keep us here through Friday night.
00:13:28.100And then they may blink Friday night and agree with with Kristi Noem and then Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary, is next.
00:13:37.440And Sean Duffy, the Transportation Secretary, those are the next ones teed up.
00:13:41.980So if they agree, how fast could that go down?
00:13:44.160Let's say that they they say we're ready to go home and play out that scenario.
00:13:48.400Yeah. And you've got a couple lined up.
00:13:50.060How quick can the votes happen if it's like, all right, let's get the hell out of here?
00:14:06.700They know Kristi Noem is going to get confirmed so they could say, you know what?
00:14:11.580We don't want to wait another 30 hours.
00:14:13.460So let's let's we'll consent to do the vote on Kristi Noem right now.
00:14:20.020And I think if they did that, Thune would let everyone go home and we'd fly home Saturday mornings and then we'd come back Monday and move on to Basant and and and Sean Duffy.
00:14:33.520So it wouldn't change anything for the Democrats.
00:14:50.820I'm going to regret this question, but I feel like I need to ask it because I know there's other people listening right now that are thinking the same thing.
00:14:56.140I am who the hell came up with these rules and how many decades old are they and how often do they change?
00:15:03.640So they are many, many decades old and and the way it works, they can change.
00:15:09.380But to change the rules takes a vote of 67 senators.
00:15:13.480So they very rarely change because you need a big supermajority.
00:15:17.880So when was the last time something like that happened that in the rules change where there was that many votes?
00:16:23.840His record in particular on Iran had been terrible.
00:16:26.160He consistently voted against sanctions against Iran.
00:16:29.540And I looked at it and said, this this makes no sense at all.
00:16:31.800And so I led a filibuster and as a brand new senator got virtually every Republican to join me when we blocked him.
00:16:40.320Now, unfortunately, the Republican Party being what it is, as soon as we did that, a bunch of Republican senators got cold feet and flipped and then they decided to let him be confirmed.
00:16:48.760So after we blocked him, they unblocked him.
00:16:51.780But not long after that, Harry Reid exercised the nuclear option to lower the threshold to confirm executive branch nominees from 60 to 50.
00:17:04.660The rules said to move to proceed to any nomination take 60 votes.
00:17:08.680But any rule, any ruling of the chair.
00:17:12.580So the so the way you do that is you stand up and you seek the presiding officer who could be the vice president or a senator from the majority party.
00:17:23.320Seek a ruling on how many how many yes votes does it take to move to proceed to a nomination.
00:17:32.960And the presiding officer will ask the parliamentarian who's sitting right and right in front of him or her.
00:17:37.220And the parliamentarian would say, well, under the text of the rules, the answer is 60.
00:17:42.660And so the chair will say the answer is 60.
00:17:45.820And what Harry Reid did did is is say, I appeal the ruling of the chair.
00:17:52.020Now, any ruling of the chair can be appealed.
00:17:55.600And the margin to overturn the ruling of the chair is 50 votes.
00:18:00.040So what happened is the chair correctly responded that it takes 60 votes to move to proceed to a confirmation.
00:18:08.720Harry Reid appealed the ruling of the chair and all the Democrats voted to overturn the ruling of the chair.
00:18:14.360And the way the Senate operates, once you have overturned a ruling of the chair, that becomes a binding precedent that binds the Senate going forward.
00:18:21.680As a result, and that's called the nuclear option, because it is essentially breaking the rules of the Senate to change the rules of the Senate, because the fact that you can appeal the ruling of the chair means you can change any rule with 50 votes if you're willing to ignore the rules.
00:18:38.280Well, the Democrats did that initially for executive branch dominations.
00:18:44.240Then subsequently they did it for judges, but not Supreme Court justices.
00:18:51.860And and and so and in fact, I remember when they did that, I remember standing on the Senate floor as they were exercising the nuclear option for judges and lowering the threshold from 60 votes to 50.
00:19:02.680I turned to Amy Klobuchar, Democrat from Minnesota, and I said, Amy, you guys are going to regret this.
00:19:07.620Because the result of this is we are going to see more Antonin Scalia's and Clarence Thomas's on the Supreme Court because you are doing this and every Democrat will regret this.
00:19:19.540And ironically, had Harry Reid not exercise the nuclear option and lowered the threshold for confirming judges from 60 votes to 50, there's no way Brett Kavanaugh would have been confirmed.
00:19:32.620Neil Gorsuch probably wouldn't have an Amy Coney Barrett definitely would have would not have.
00:19:39.320Wow. And so literally Roe versus Wade would not have been overturned.
00:19:43.000And you want to know whose fault it is that Roe versus Wade was overturned?
00:19:47.000Harry Reid and every Democrat senator who voted to exercise the nuclear option.
00:19:51.540And I got to admit, I told them that when they did it.
00:19:57.200Wow. And they just didn't play the long game.
00:20:00.340I guess it was that personal or they were that angry at the time.
00:20:03.320You know, they're the Democrats will exercise power and they rarely think about tomorrow.
00:20:10.260And we point out all the time, look, if you do this, you know, turnabout's fair play.
00:20:16.240When we get the majority, we'll do it back to you.
00:20:18.480And and they live in sort of this this denial of reality that they don't ever seem, you know, I've been in the Senate 13 years, about half the time I've been in the majority, about half the time I've been in the minority.
00:20:31.620Republicans actually try to focus a fair about on, hey, we want to do things that that preserve the institution because we recognize there's going to be a time in the future when we're in the minority again.
00:20:42.960And we don't want to just get completely steamrolled the next time we're in the minority.
00:20:47.440So we will we will show some respect for the minority.
00:20:52.080So the institution operates differently than the House.
00:20:55.660Look, the House, the House majority can do whatever the hell it wants.
00:20:59.480And being in the minority in the House sucks because you have virtually no power in the Senate.
00:21:07.120Even being in the minority, an individual senator could exercise a lot of power and influence.
00:21:12.540And that's one of the things that makes the institution work well.
00:21:15.400It's interesting. It is really interesting.
00:21:17.380So your gut here, your prediction, I want one.
00:23:05.240We're grabbing violent criminals now all over the country.
00:23:08.560We're getting videos of those arrests being made in their rap sheets.
00:23:11.800This is a full court press by the federal government who's been empowered to do their damn job on getting rid of the bad guys in this country.
00:23:23.280The worst of the worst of the violent criminals that are illegal immigrants.
00:23:27.400And also a securing the border mentality all into one.
00:23:31.400Well, look, on day one, President Trump signed over 100 executive orders.
00:23:38.240And I will say there is a world of difference between this Trump administration and the one we saw in 2017.
00:23:45.300Listen, in 2017, most of the Trump team had never served in the federal government.
00:23:51.880They didn't really know what they were biting off.
00:23:55.580You know, they were actually one member of the Trump family said to me over this weekend, said, yeah, we we were the dog that caught the car.
00:24:02.480But like it was it was that they found themselves in the White House and and there was a steep learning curve.
00:24:10.600And I will say in the first term, the Trump White House made some some serious mistakes, particularly with staffing, appointing some people to senior positions who ended up fighting against President Trump every step of the way.
00:24:23.580This time around, I think it is a dramatically different White House and a dramatically different administration.
00:24:29.620One of the biggest ways it's different.
00:24:33.400This this selection of cabinet nominees, I think, is very strong.
00:24:36.940I think they're looking for people who are loyal and committed to the president and the president's agenda.
00:24:41.860I think they are they are doing a much better job avoiding appointing people who are going to fight against the president's agenda and try to undermine it from within.
00:24:52.060And there was a lot of that in the first term.
00:24:53.900I also think when it comes to the executive orders that they just they put in collectively that the transition team and a lot of lawyers working with them thousands and thousands of hours getting ready for it.
00:25:05.720And so many of the executive orders dealt with with the border.
00:25:10.760The clearest mandate from this election was to secure the border.
00:25:14.680And I think these executive orders are all designed to do that, to build the wall, to surge manpower, to go after illegal aliens, to go after criminal illegal aliens, to go after murderers and rapists and child molesters, to go after gang members.
00:25:27.840And I think you're seeing every cabinet agency focusing on it to restore the remain in Mexico agreement, to end catch and release.
00:25:38.900And remember, this is something that I predicted on verdict from the beginning, which is that we would secure the border.
00:25:44.720It wouldn't take a year or even six months that it would be immediate because the damage done to the border was done primarily through executive orders and just through deliberate inaction on the part of Joe Biden, the executive.
00:25:58.280And so all of that could be reversed immediately.
00:26:00.340Now, Congress needs to follow up and pass legislation to provide real funding for the resources we need at the border and hopefully to put in federal law stronger protections to stop the next Democrat president from trying to repeat what Joe Biden did.
00:26:17.540And but look, if you compare, it's funny, I had had reporters this week ask me, said, said, well, what is it strange that Trump's executive orders and the legislation Congress is working on this year are so overlapping and so similar?
00:26:35.000And I laughed and said, no, it's not strange at all.
00:26:37.680We're both acting to implement the mandate from the voters.
00:26:42.160We're both trying to accomplish the same agenda.
00:26:44.940And I said, listen, the advantage of executive orders and regulations and executive action is that it's quick.
00:26:54.500The disadvantage of it is it can be reversed instantaneously.
00:26:58.980A great deal of the good Donald Trump did in the first term was reversed as soon as Joe Biden came into office because everything you do with an executive order, you can undo.
00:27:07.600And by the way, a lot of Trump's executive orders were just reversing the terrible Biden executive orders.
00:27:13.000So executive orders are quick, but they're temporary.
00:27:17.740Legislation is slower, but it has the advantage of if you write it in the federal law, it's much harder to change.
00:27:25.140So it's much more of a permanent change.
00:27:27.440And so I think the Trump executive orders are trying to accomplish exactly what we're going to accomplish or I very much hope we're going to accomplish through passing legislation through Congress this year.
00:27:38.580Let's go through what you think is the most important things that have happened so far and why it's having such a quick impact.
00:27:45.320The single most important thing for dropping the numbers is ending catch and release.
00:27:52.060There there's no policy decision that there's no policy question that matters more than what happens when you apprehend an illegal immigrant at the border in terms of illegal immigration.
00:28:04.660If the answer is you put them on a plane and you fly them home, the numbers plummet and they plummet immediately because virtually everyone who comes into this country illegally has a cell phone.
00:28:14.360And so they call back home and say, hey, don't come.
00:28:27.120And so ending catch and release and hand in hand with that is reinstating remain in Mexico.
00:28:33.860Now, look, reinstating remain in Mexico is a little complicated because that actually takes the cooperation of the government of Mexico.
00:28:41.200So Trump has signed an executive order saying we're going to reinstate it.
00:28:45.020But the Mexican government has to cooperate for that to work.
00:28:48.100And that's why Trump has also threatened a 25 percent tariff on Mexico.
00:28:54.440That's how he got the Mexican government to agree to remain in Mexico in the first term.
00:28:59.360And I hope it's how he will get the Mexican government again to agree with it now.
00:29:04.040Well, let's talk also quickly for people that just don't understand what's happening in Mexico.
00:29:10.020Mexico's in a really weird and interesting spot internally in their politics.
00:29:14.920There's so much corruption down there.
00:29:16.760Is there a chance that we could see a government stand up to these cartels because of the pressure that Donald Trump is willing to put on them, including using things to leverage like tariffs?
00:29:32.020I will say it's harder to accomplish now after four years of Biden because the cartels are much, much more powerful.
00:29:39.160Listen, one stat that I pointed out many times in 2018, the Mexican drug cartels were making roughly five hundred million dollars in revenue from human trafficking.
00:29:50.960Last year, the Mexican drug cartels made over 13 billion dollars from human trafficking.
00:29:58.000That's a two thousand six hundred percent increase.
00:30:00.780And so what Joe Biden and the Democrats have done is they've turned these drug cartels that are vicious, murdering, torturing.
00:30:08.320I mean, they are horrible transnational criminal enterprises that that they don't care about human life at all.
00:30:13.980They they commit thousands and thousands of murderers, but they turn them into multi, multi billion dollar empires.
00:30:22.520And it's had a tragic effect on on Mexico.
00:30:25.480The number of murders and kidnappings there that the rule of law has been incredibly undermined.
00:30:31.220And Joe Biden, not only has he done huge damage to America, he's done huge damage to Mexico by making the cartel so powerful.
00:30:37.920So it is riskier now for the president of Mexico to stand up to the cartels.
00:30:43.840She's literally risking her life because the cartels are more than happy to murder politicians.
00:30:48.260They murdered a lot of politicians in Mexico.
00:31:01.080I mean, just just it is lawless and terror.
00:31:05.180And so, listen, I think we will get Mexico to cooperate because at the end of the day, the leverage that the president has is is so enormous.
00:31:14.020And I also think, look, AMLO, the previous president of Mexico, was scared of Trump that.
00:31:20.160I think he's got real credibility when he threatens to impose the tariffs.
00:31:24.060You better believe he's willing to do that.
00:31:26.120And and that, I think, really incentivizes Mexico to cooperate.
00:31:32.100Now, listen, I think as the United States goes after the cartels, as we cut off their money, as we throw their leaders in prison, as we kill kill many of the cartel leaders.
00:31:42.720I think you'll see the cartels being weakened and that over the next four years will make it easier for the Mexican government to fight back on them.
00:31:52.960But Biden and the Democrats efforts have made the cartels much, much more dangerous.
00:33:33.200We've talked a lot on on verdict about how the scandal with with Hunter Biden and the Biden crime family was never about Hunter being a, you know, guy who abuses drugs and has made a lot of wrong choices in life.
00:33:49.480The scandal was always that the entire Biden family made millions of dollars selling favors from the big guy, selling favors from Joe Biden.
00:33:58.920It was always about Joe Biden's corruption.
00:34:00.600And we talked a lot about how the Biden DOJ were the tell in terms of whether they were being politicized on protecting Biden would be if they fought in the Hunter Biden investigation to protect Joe himself and to prevent any inquiry into his corruption.
00:34:19.920If they kept it focused on the drug crime or the gun crime or even the the income tax crimes that were personal to Hunter rather than examining the corruption, that's exactly what they did.
00:34:32.480And so I think that corruption needs to be investigated.
00:34:36.720And I think we need to enforce the law fairly, regardless of party.
00:34:41.860And I got to say, by the way, we predicted on this podcast when when we number one predicted the Hunter Biden pardon.
00:34:49.300And in fact, I put the odds of the Hunter Biden pardon at 100 percent.
00:34:58.580But second, when that happened, we went on this podcast and predicted, said he's going to pardon the rest of his family.
00:35:05.880Well, he did that on the very last day, moments before he left office.
00:35:10.020He pardoned the rest of his family because they were all involved in the corruption.
00:35:13.500They were all involved in selling favors.
00:35:15.320And so right now, the only one with potential liability is Joe Biden himself.
00:35:19.820And, you know, Trump's right that it's interesting he didn't pardon himself.
00:35:24.480We'll we'll see if that has real consequences.
00:35:26.660By the way, one of the results of all these pardons is that Congress can now subpoena the members of the Biden family and force them to answer questions under oath.
00:35:38.360And they don't have a Fifth Amendment right to decline to answer.
00:35:41.420Really? OK, so a lot of people know that, including me.
00:35:44.260So explain that a little bit for everybody, because that is that is big news.
00:35:48.300So the Fifth Amendment says that you can't be forced to testify against yourself.
00:35:53.420Now, that only applies if you have criminal jeopardy, if you can be prosecuted.
00:35:58.700Once you've been pardoned, you have no criminal jeopardy, which means you don't have the right to say I'm not going to answer that because I might incriminate myself in a crime.
00:36:07.000Because if it's a federal crime, you can't be prosecuted for it, which means if you refuse to answer, you can be held in contempt and put in jail.
00:36:23.080There's a very real chance that members of the Biden crime family that were pardoned could be asked to come and testify in Congress and they would be forced to answer the questions for the reasons you just stated.
00:36:35.260Yep. And if they don't, by the way, same is true about Fauci that, you know, you know, Biden pardoned Fauci.
00:36:42.360That means Fauci doesn't have a Fifth Amendment right to refuse to answer questions under oath.
00:36:47.120I certainly hope that he's forced to answer those questions.
00:36:51.000And I got to say. So hold on, hypothetically, you get Fauci in front of you, you start asking him questions and he just refuses to answer those questions.
00:36:58.400Is that in contempt of Congress at that point?
00:37:01.720Well, Congress has to vote to hold him in contempt for refusing to answer those questions.
00:37:05.320And then the Department of Justice has to prosecute him.
00:37:08.400I got to say, I think if Congress voted to hold him in contempt, I think DOJ would prosecute him.
00:37:12.980And by the way, to be clear, the Biden Department of Justice, Trump mentioned putting Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro in prison.
00:37:19.040They did that because they held them in contempt to Congress.
00:37:22.160And that was even aside from from pleading the Fifth there.
00:37:26.400They just refused to testify. They argued they asserted executive privilege and DOJ prosecuted them after Congress, after the House voted to hold him in contempt of Congress.
00:37:38.340Incredible. All right. We've got a lot to watch now. Thanks for that.
00:37:42.140This is why I love doing the show. We're glad that you're back.
00:37:44.580We hope you make it home this weekend back to the fam and that Democrats don't hold these votes and ruin everybody's weekend with their family.
00:37:52.200That's for sure. Don't forget, we do the show Monday, Wednesday, Friday.
00:37:55.160We have a weekend review for things you may have missed on Saturday.
00:37:59.640So make sure you grab that show. Also grab my podcast, the Ben Ferguson podcast.
00:38:03.520I'll keep you up to date on those in-between days.
00:38:05.840And the senator and I will see you back here for obviously what's going to be a very exciting show,
00:38:10.220depending on what happens over the weekend on Monday morning.
00:38:13.940This is an iHeart podcast. Guaranteed human.