Verdict with Ted Cruz - December 27, 2024


Bombshell story on how the Deep State COVERED UP China's Complicity in Covid, plus Deranged Dems Want to Block Trump's Swearing In


Episode Stats

Length

37 minutes

Words per Minute

187.8221

Word Count

7,034

Sentence Count

507

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

7


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.620 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.340 Welcome.
00:00:06.060 It is Verdict with Senator Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson with you.
00:00:09.440 Senator, let's just start with this.
00:00:11.700 I hope you had a fabulous Christmas and everyone else listening, I hope you had a fabulous
00:00:15.680 Christmas as well.
00:00:17.240 You got to give me some anecdote from Christmas Day.
00:00:19.740 Did you get anything cool?
00:00:20.900 Was there an exciting moment before we get into politics?
00:00:24.080 Well, I'll just say Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy New Year.
00:00:28.400 Actually, Christmas was awesome.
00:00:29.440 I was just at home with Heidi and both our girls.
00:00:33.260 My parents were here.
00:00:35.160 We relaxed.
00:00:36.460 We had Christmas dinner.
00:00:38.320 We had a big ham.
00:00:40.180 I will say we do have a new puppy.
00:00:42.500 The new puppy is Rudy.
00:00:44.820 Rudy is a golden doodle.
00:00:46.660 He looks like a giant teddy bear come to life.
00:00:49.600 He is Catherine's puppy.
00:00:51.480 He is 14 weeks old.
00:00:53.820 Rudy yaps a lot.
00:00:54.920 In fact, you may well get some podcasts with Rudy yapping in the background.
00:00:59.180 Because I do many of these at home.
00:01:02.400 And I've met Rudy.
00:01:03.520 He is cute, man.
00:01:04.580 Like, Rudy is next level cute.
00:01:06.540 He is majorly cute.
00:01:08.840 And I will say, all right, on Christmas Day, so we had a ham, which was great.
00:01:12.680 And at the end, I turned to Heidi and said, what do you think?
00:01:15.420 Should we give Rudy the ham bone?
00:01:16.620 She said, sure.
00:01:17.100 So I tossed Rudy the ham bone.
00:01:18.900 And I cannot believe this little puppy became a wolf.
00:01:24.880 Like, he began consuming.
00:01:27.000 And he's, you know, he's tiny.
00:01:28.800 He is the size of a teddy bear.
00:01:30.720 Yeah, he's little.
00:01:31.800 But he's, like, chowing into this ham bone.
00:01:34.580 And then he runs into her bushes.
00:01:36.540 And he's in his cave.
00:01:37.700 And he is a wolf.
00:01:38.640 And I'm sitting there.
00:01:39.600 I'm kind of feeling mildly concerned.
00:01:42.060 So I pull out my phone.
00:01:43.400 And I Google, should you give a puppy a ham bone?
00:01:46.120 I cannot wait to hear what Google said back to you on this one.
00:01:48.820 And it turns out that Google says, no, this is a very bad idea.
00:01:52.820 Ham bones can splinter.
00:01:54.200 And they can stick in their stomach and kill your puppy.
00:01:57.140 And I'm sitting here thinking, OK, Catherine is going to kill me.
00:02:00.220 If I kill her dog, I'm in trouble.
00:02:03.180 So I go try to get Rudy.
00:02:05.280 And he does not want to give up the ham bone.
00:02:07.200 And the problem is, is I'm approaching him everywhere I go.
00:02:10.700 He runs in the bushes and runs in the bushes.
00:02:13.060 So I have to drag Heidi out of the kitchen because we need a pincher movement to come
00:02:17.580 from both sides because Rudy is running.
00:02:19.560 And we finally got him and got the ham bone away from him.
00:02:21.680 Isn't it amazing how scary Google can be, though, in those moments?
00:02:24.620 It's like it tells you basically everything that is fun is no longer fun.
00:02:28.540 I'm convinced that's what Google's job is.
00:02:30.320 And he was such a happy puppy.
00:02:32.500 This is this is absolutely the greatest joy this this animal has had since he has been
00:02:40.000 on planet Earth was chowing into that ham bone until Heidi and I had to.
00:02:44.940 But he had he had actually he'd eaten all the ham.
00:02:46.800 So he was in the chewing into bone moment.
00:02:49.440 We're like, all right, fine.
00:02:50.220 That's probably enough.
00:02:51.460 That's enough.
00:02:52.160 All right.
00:02:52.420 So we got to ask, how did how did you get the name?
00:02:54.860 Who named him?
00:02:55.720 How did we come up with a name?
00:02:57.040 Rudy, where is it?
00:02:58.080 I mean, instantly your movie after our movie show.
00:03:00.680 So everyone's going to think, Rudy, we're going back to Notre Dame here and the famous
00:03:04.340 movie.
00:03:04.880 OK, except for the fact that I didn't name the dog.
00:03:08.200 Catherine named the dog.
00:03:10.160 So Caroline has three cats.
00:03:12.520 Yeah.
00:03:12.700 And this puppy was for Catherine.
00:03:14.200 So Catherine got to name the dog and Rudy.
00:03:16.120 It actually is connected.
00:03:17.180 So our last podcast, by the way, if you didn't watch your Christmas Day podcast or didn't
00:03:20.780 listen to it, and it is on YouTube so you can watch it, too.
00:03:23.520 I'd encourage you to go back.
00:03:24.580 It's a very different podcast from what we do normally, which is Ben and I talked about 25 of
00:03:29.580 my favorite movies, and we went through a bunch of movies, and I love movies, and we
00:03:33.060 go through a ton of them.
00:03:35.060 And by the way, I told you this story, Ben, as we're getting ready to record.
00:03:38.800 In the afternoon of Christmas Day, we went over to a friend's house a few blocks away
00:03:42.880 from her house who had a Christmas Day party, and it was very cool.
00:03:46.100 There were lots of people out walking their dogs and out on the street, and this one family
00:03:49.840 stopped me, and this very nice woman said, hey, I listened to the podcast this morning.
00:03:55.140 I loved it.
00:03:55.680 Great movie recommendations.
00:03:56.840 I'm going to go watch them now.
00:03:58.420 And so I thought that was very cool.
00:04:00.620 It made me happy.
00:04:02.800 But if you recall, at the very beginning of the movie podcast, you asked me what was the
00:04:07.980 most recent thing I was watching, and I told you it was The Outer Banks, and The Outer Banks
00:04:12.520 is this teeny bopper series on Netflix that Catherine is very into, and Catherine had asked me to
00:04:18.160 watch it so that we could talk about the plot development.
00:04:20.720 So I watched the whole thing.
00:04:22.520 Well, one of the stars of the show is J.J., and the actor who plays J.J. is Rudy.
00:04:28.960 I don't remember Rudy's last name.
00:04:30.280 Rudy something.
00:04:30.980 Catherine knows his last name.
00:04:33.140 But Rudy something plays J.J., who is the sort of kind of cute surfer boy, rebel, sort
00:04:40.180 of a lot of trouble.
00:04:41.160 But listen, I can get why if you're a 14-year-old girl, he would be sort of a cute, attractive
00:04:46.800 guy.
00:04:47.040 So our puppy is named after the actor who plays J.J. in Outer Banks.
00:04:51.660 But as a Houstonian, I'm treating Rudy, I call him Rudy T, because I treat him as Rudy
00:04:56.120 Tomjanovich, the coach of the Rockets when we won the NBA championship in 94 and 95.
00:05:02.300 So for Catherine, he's Rudy.
00:05:03.820 But for me, I think the T is silent.
00:05:05.800 I love it.
00:05:06.420 That is nice.
00:05:07.600 And by the way, on the movie list, so you'll laugh, we got a new TV, right?
00:05:11.760 That was one of those like Christmas things.
00:05:13.160 Have you seen these frame TVs where it puts up artwork on the TV?
00:05:17.660 Oh, yeah.
00:05:17.880 You're getting highfalutin.
00:05:19.260 I'm sorry.
00:05:20.060 I'm not sure I can hang around such a fancy pants guy.
00:05:24.160 So this has been on the Mrs. List.
00:05:26.600 And she's like, look, I just love it.
00:05:28.340 It doesn't look like a TV hanging on your wall in the living room.
00:05:31.060 It can have like art up there.
00:05:32.600 So Black Friday, I grabbed the TV.
00:05:35.140 So fast forward to today, my dad's in town, and he's helping me mount this new TV.
00:05:41.580 And my mother-in-law comes over, and she's like, hey, I've got the list of movies that
00:05:45.780 you guys talked about.
00:05:46.880 Why don't you guys hurry up and put that TV up there, and we'll watch one of Ted's favorite
00:05:52.700 movies.
00:05:53.220 And I'm like, okay, great.
00:05:54.540 The only problem was we ran into a mounting issue with this fancy new TV, because it doesn't
00:06:00.280 mount like the other normal TVs in the world.
00:06:02.680 And finally, she gave up.
00:06:04.140 She was like, I'll see you tomorrow or whenever, and we'll watch the movie then.
00:06:07.260 So I disappointed my mother-in-law, but she was excited about your list.
00:06:11.120 So there is that there.
00:06:12.100 At least there's a silver lining in the moment.
00:06:14.960 And I don't know which TV it was, but she had written down the list of movies that she
00:06:19.720 had never watched that you had on your list, and then it turned into a thing.
00:06:22.920 So now I have a feeling I'm going to be watching some movies with the mother-in-law.
00:06:27.320 She's a movie fan like you are.
00:06:28.640 And then she asked, she goes, does he go to the movie theater?
00:06:30.940 I said, yes, he loves to go to the movie theater.
00:06:32.780 Did you go to any movies over the holidays?
00:06:34.760 I did.
00:06:35.300 I saw Gladiator 2, which I enjoyed.
00:06:37.760 It wasn't as good as Gladiator 1, but Denzel's awesome, and so it was fun.
00:06:43.480 So Rotten Tomatoes has their rating system.
00:06:46.100 If we're going to have a TC rating system, what would you have rated the new one?
00:06:50.200 Oh, I don't know.
00:06:52.720 On 1 to 5, I'd give it a 3.7.
00:06:58.580 I enjoyed it.
00:07:00.560 But Gladiator 1 is like a 4.9.
00:07:04.000 I don't remember, was Gladiator 1 in my top 25?
00:07:08.280 If it wasn't, it could easily have been.
00:07:09.920 Gladiator 1 is an awesome movie.
00:07:11.840 Gladiator 2 is fine.
00:07:12.940 So hold on, on a 5 scale, 0 to 5, what is a perfect 5 movie, just so everybody has a
00:07:19.340 barometer here?
00:07:20.140 The Princess Bride is right at the top of that list.
00:07:22.500 There you go.
00:07:23.100 5.0 there.
00:07:24.000 I love it.
00:07:24.740 All right, so let's get back to the world of politics as well.
00:07:28.140 And as we said, I like it.
00:07:29.900 We get to talk a little movies here.
00:07:31.220 We got a 5.0 Princess Bride.
00:07:32.900 If you've never watched it, you better do it.
00:07:35.140 That's just part of, if you like this podcast, that's like a price of admission.
00:07:40.380 If you've not seen Princess Bride, because you've watched it, what, 50 times in your
00:07:43.660 life?
00:07:44.160 Probably more.
00:07:45.100 More than that, I did get from a friend for Christmas this year a leather-bound copy of
00:07:51.280 the book The Princess Bride.
00:07:52.380 The book The Princess Bride is wonderful, too, but the movie is exquisite.
00:07:56.160 And I do take sort of odd, I don't know, like reverse psychology joy.
00:08:02.840 The entire cast of The Princess Bride are all lefties, and they periodically get together
00:08:08.540 and they do events to support Democrats, and many of them have been critical of me.
00:08:12.840 And actually, oddly enough, Cary Elwes, who is the dread pirate Roberts, and also Wesley,
00:08:18.000 so is the male lead in the movie, is a big lefty who I've gotten in Twitter wars with,
00:08:24.340 and he finally blocked me.
00:08:25.800 Like, he was bashing me.
00:08:27.960 And these guys think I can't enjoy their movie because they're little communists,
00:08:31.140 and so they say, no, no, no, you have to be a communist to enjoy my movie.
00:08:33.380 I'm like, screw you.
00:08:33.980 You made your art.
00:08:35.060 It's for the world to enjoy.
00:08:36.460 You don't get to decide how I enjoy it.
00:08:38.820 And amusingly enough, so when I got in a Twitter war with Cary Elwes,
00:08:42.920 I have in my office, you've been to my office in D.C., hanging on the wall,
00:08:48.200 is a signed photograph of Cary Elwes as the dread pirate Roberts.
00:08:53.300 And it is inscribed, not just to Ted, but to Ted Cruz, and, oh, I don't remember what he wrote.
00:08:59.000 I should remember what he wrote, but I don't.
00:09:00.440 But it's signed by him, and it was my first year in the Senate,
00:09:04.000 and we had an intern in the office who went to, like, a Comic-Con convention,
00:09:09.160 and he was there signing autographs, and she got him to sign it to me by name.
00:09:14.500 And I think at the time he didn't know who I was because he probably would have refused to do it.
00:09:18.300 But when we were in the Twitter fight, I took a picture of the framed photo of him
00:09:23.660 inscribed to me on my wall and tweeted it out, and he got so mad he blocked me.
00:09:28.240 That is actually hilarious.
00:09:29.760 All right, so I have my Princess Bride story, and then I promise we'll get to the political world.
00:09:34.840 So in high school—
00:09:35.760 By the way, there's a lot going on in politics.
00:09:37.460 There is, there is.
00:09:38.380 But in high school, you can judge me for this.
00:09:42.160 We had to do a book report on the Princess Bride.
00:09:44.840 Had to read the book.
00:09:46.120 You will not be shocked to know that when I was focused solely on playing tennis
00:09:50.960 and trying to make decent grades, there is a chance I went and bought the Cliff Notes.
00:09:57.340 Oh.
00:09:58.420 Not even the movie.
00:09:59.620 Not even the movie.
00:10:00.400 The Cliff Notes.
00:10:01.120 I was like, I got it.
00:10:02.220 And then I overachieved, and I went and bought the Spark Notes as well.
00:10:04.760 By the way, let me ask you something.
00:10:05.740 I think, do our younger listeners know what Cliff Notes are?
00:10:09.680 Do those still exist?
00:10:10.860 They do.
00:10:11.560 Cliff Notes and Spark Notes still exist.
00:10:13.340 So that's still a—I mean, look, it's been a while since you and I were in high school
00:10:16.900 and college, so I haven't looked for Cliff Notes.
00:10:18.100 I think most of them do chat GBT or whatever now, right?
00:10:21.780 But if you look at them, it's that—so Cliff Notes is the one that had the yellow and black
00:10:26.860 light on the cover.
00:10:27.060 Yeah, no, I remember them well.
00:10:28.580 Yeah.
00:10:28.940 And so someone in the class said, hey, make sure you get the Spark Notes.
00:10:32.540 Well, the joke was on me.
00:10:33.580 I was a new student at Westminster Academy, and my teacher, I will never forget her best
00:10:37.080 teacher I've ever had in my life, Mrs. Perry.
00:10:39.380 She made sure that every single question on your test for your book report could not be
00:10:46.980 answered by reading the Cliff Notes or the Spark Notes, so I got an F.
00:10:52.220 I got an F.
00:10:52.900 It was the first time I ever bought Cliff Notes and the last time I ever bought Cliff Notes
00:10:57.000 in high school, because she made sure there was not a single question that could be answered
00:11:01.440 from Cliff Notes.
00:11:02.780 That is a good teacher.
00:11:04.620 Benjamin, you have fallen for the second oldest blunder in the world.
00:11:07.360 The first, of course, is never get involved in a land war in Asia, but the second, only
00:11:11.080 slightly less famous, is never go against a Sicilian when death is on the line.
00:11:15.920 Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.
00:11:19.980 And he falls over dead.
00:11:21.660 Yeah, there you go.
00:11:23.280 So there's, yeah, there's a steady moment for you kids out there.
00:11:25.600 I can do the entire damn movie.
00:11:27.320 It really is.
00:11:28.000 It's a sick party trick.
00:11:30.660 And I got to tell you, as a teenager, it was not effective for getting girls.
00:11:38.440 It was not.
00:11:39.340 No, no, no.
00:11:40.240 I have no doubt imagined that.
00:11:41.480 I got to say, being a tennis star, I'm sure was more effective in that regard.
00:11:46.120 It definitely worked more than quoting Princess Bride.
00:11:49.300 That's a low bar.
00:11:51.040 I don't know what that's actually saying, but, you know, barely there.
00:11:56.240 But, you know, I could go to a Dungeons & Dragons convention and, like, hang out and be just fine.
00:12:01.260 Be honest.
00:12:01.980 Did you ever go to one?
00:12:03.080 Because I never did.
00:12:04.000 I didn't know they existed.
00:12:04.480 No, I did not go to a convention.
00:12:05.560 I did play Dungeons & Dragons as a kid, but I did not actually go to a convention.
00:12:09.220 It's sort of, it's kind of like Star Trek.
00:12:11.740 I'm sort of a Trekkie in that I've watched all the movies.
00:12:14.480 I've watched not 100% of the episodes, but most of them.
00:12:18.080 And I really like Star Trek.
00:12:19.500 But Trekkies are such, so intense about it that I don't actually dress as Mr. Spock,
00:12:27.700 so I don't feel like a full-on Trekkie.
00:12:29.480 I just really enjoy Star Trek.
00:12:31.780 So the first TV show you and I would have ever connected on then clearly would have been
00:12:35.460 The West Wing.
00:12:37.140 West Wing is fabulous.
00:12:39.980 That was, I've watched it, I don't know, six, seven times.
00:12:44.280 See, I only think I've watched it once.
00:12:45.720 I watched it when it aired live, and that was before streaming.
00:12:51.300 So I was, and Heidi and I were on the George W. Bush campaign at the time, so every night
00:12:56.740 it aired Wednesdays, I think at 9 p.m., and we had TVs at the end.
00:13:01.560 We all had cubicles.
00:13:02.460 We're all in little cubicles at 301 Congress Avenue in Austin, Texas, and at 9 p.m. Wednesday
00:13:07.400 at the end of every aisle of cubicles was a TV, and we would stop, and for an hour from
00:13:11.780 9 to 10 p.m., every campaign staffer would watch The West Wing, and I watched it live,
00:13:17.400 but I don't know that I've ever watched a rerun of The West Wing, so I loved every episode.
00:13:21.420 So every time I get sick, every time I'm like the flu or I've had a surgery, that's when
00:13:26.440 I will binge watch it, because I have the DVD set, and it's like comfort food.
00:13:30.880 It's like you're sick, and you can kind of doze off and take a nap and wake up, and you
00:13:34.780 know exactly where you are in the series, and that's when I watch it.
00:13:37.200 I never watch outside of when I'm sick, but if I am really sick, in bed, laid up, it
00:13:41.700 is West Wing for me the entire time.
00:13:44.320 All right, let's get...
00:13:45.280 By the way, what series are you watching now?
00:13:47.860 This is a complete digression.
00:13:49.240 Oh, 100%, I am all into Landman.
00:13:52.440 Landman is so good.
00:13:53.900 It's so good.
00:13:54.520 Landman is crack cocaine inserted in my veins.
00:13:58.200 Billy Bob Thornton, I love the man, and Taylor Sheridan can write like nobody's business.
00:14:05.120 Yeah, he's like the new Aaron Sorkin of my life, and Sorkin, for people that don't know,
00:14:09.680 he did West Wing and several other amazing shows.
00:14:11.840 The American President.
00:14:13.080 American President, the movie, yeah, Newsroom, the show on HBO.
00:14:15.900 Did you watch the Newsroom, by the way?
00:14:17.260 I did, it was well done.
00:14:18.620 Yeah, so it was one of those, and I actually knew a couple of the people that were, quote,
00:14:23.800 consultants on that, the same way that Sorkin had consultants like Dee Dee Myers and others
00:14:29.040 on the West Wing, and they wanted to make it extremely accurate in the newsroom.
00:14:33.040 At the time, I was a commentator at CNN when Newsroom came out, and I've been, like, every
00:14:37.660 time, I think it was every Sunday night, it came out at 9 on HBO, and I was just like,
00:14:41.920 watch it religiously.
00:14:43.420 Those guys, like you said, Sheridan can write, but yeah, Landman right now is amazing, and
00:14:48.340 then obviously they're wrapping up Yellowstone with this, like, last season.
00:14:51.920 And by the way, we are going to do a different episode that is not this episode, but we are
00:14:55.760 going to do an episode like the movie episode on streaming series to watch, because I've
00:15:01.060 got a, I'm on a lot of airplanes, and so I watch a lot of streaming series, but that
00:15:04.900 will not be this episode, it'll be later.
00:15:06.480 Last thing, what's the top one on your list right now?
00:15:08.460 What are you watching streaming, besides Landman?
00:15:10.900 So streaming, I'm watching The Gifted, which Caroline, my oldest daughter, asked me to
00:15:15.360 watch that.
00:15:15.960 It's sort of a mutant series that had two seasons, so I'm in the middle of the second
00:15:19.080 season of that.
00:15:20.460 And then I'm in season seven of The Walking Dead, which I never watched The Walking Dead
00:15:24.440 when it was on air, and so what I'm now, when I'm on airplanes...
00:15:27.060 Is it worth it, because I've never watched it?
00:15:28.780 Oh, look, it's a bunch of zombies eating your face, like, it's not, is it literature?
00:15:34.400 No.
00:15:35.440 But it's fun, I'm enjoying it, and it is, you know, I do get strange looks on an airplane
00:15:39.820 when I'm sitting there on a plane, and people walk by, and there's a zombie eating someone's
00:15:43.740 face, and there's, you know, people who don't like me are like, figures, yeah, he'd be rooting
00:15:48.600 for the zombies.
00:15:49.080 That's exactly what I expected, he'd be watching.
00:15:51.040 For the record, I'm not rooting for the zombies, but haters gonna hate.
00:15:54.960 Haters gonna hate, I love it.
00:15:56.140 All right, now, let's get back to the political world.
00:15:58.620 I enjoyed that, by the way, that was nice, after Christmas.
00:16:01.640 So, Joe Biden's administration has got some cover-ups going on that the Wall Street Journal
00:16:08.100 Center is reporting on.
00:16:10.000 Behind the closed doors, we found out that the Lably cover-up was a legit cover-up, and
00:16:15.740 now, since he's lost, it's like, oh, we can report on this now.
00:16:19.720 Well, this was a story that came out of the Wall Street Journal December 26, and it really
00:16:24.180 is a bombshell story, and it describes how the federal government, essentially the deep
00:16:30.160 state, under Joe Biden, but this is also true under Trump, they didn't, the journal article
00:16:34.800 doesn't talk about Trump, but I'm very interested to what was happening under the Trump administration
00:16:38.780 as well, but how the deep state covered up the evidence and covered up the scientists that
00:16:45.260 were arguing that the COVID virus escaped from the Wuhan lab in China.
00:16:51.820 And it focuses on, in particular, it starts with Jason Bannon.
00:16:57.400 So, here, I'm just going to read you the beginning of the article, because it lays it out.
00:17:01.120 A car and driver had been ready to whisk Jason Bannon from FBI headquarters early one morning
00:17:05.640 in August 2021 to brief the White House on a novel virus that was killing hundreds of thousands
00:17:10.640 of Americans that had stopped the world in its tracks.
00:17:14.000 Bannon had been told by his superiors to be on hand in case the Federal Bureau of Investigation
00:17:18.540 was asked to join a top intelligence community briefing for the president.
00:17:23.180 But the White House summons never came.
00:17:26.120 Bannon, a PhD in microbiology, had joined the Bureau after the September 11th terrorist attacks
00:17:31.140 in New York and Washington, when the agency bulked up its expertise to deal with the threat
00:17:35.500 of germ weapons, toxins, and other weapons of mass destruction.
00:17:38.860 But for more than a year, he had spent most of his waking hours on the COVID-19 virus that
00:17:43.380 had seeped out of China in 2019.
00:17:46.760 Frustrated by China's stonewalling, President Biden had ordered an urgent assessment by the
00:17:51.140 U.S. intelligence agencies and national laboratories on whether the virus had leapt from an animal
00:17:56.080 to a human or had escaped from a Chinese lab that had been doing extensive work on coronaviruses.
00:18:01.680 The dominant view within the intelligence community was clear when Avril Haines, the director of
00:18:06.400 national intelligence, and a couple of her senior analysts briefed Biden's and his top aides
00:18:10.900 on August 24th. The National Intelligence Council, a body of senior intelligence officers who reported
00:18:16.560 to Haines, and that organized the intelligence review, had concluded with, quote, low confidence
00:18:22.540 that COVID-19 had emerged when the virus leapt from an animal to a human. So did four intelligence
00:18:29.200 agencies. At the time, the FBI was the only agency that had concluded that a lab leak was likely,
00:18:36.740 a judgment that it had rendered with, quote, moderate confidence. But neither Bannon nor any other FBI
00:18:44.420 officials were at the briefing to make the case firsthand to the president. Quote, being the only
00:18:51.820 agency that assessed a laboratory origin was more likely, and the agency that expressed the highest
00:18:57.560 level confidence in its analysis of the source of the pandemic, we anticipated the FBI would be asked
00:19:03.220 to attend the briefing, Bannon recalled in his first on-the-record interview on the subject.
00:19:07.940 I find it surprising that the White House didn't ask. In this article in the Wall Street Journal,
00:19:13.180 it goes on and on discussing Bannon, this FBI scientist, but also scientists throughout the
00:19:19.440 federal government who had laid out evidence early on that COVID came from a Chinese lab,
00:19:24.200 and that evidence was systematically shut down. It was systematically de-emphasized,
00:19:30.020 it appears that it was systematically blocked from going to the White House under Joe Biden. And as
00:19:35.320 I said, I'm very interested. The Wall Street Journal doesn't report this, but my suspicion is they
00:19:39.920 were doing the exact same thing when Donald Trump was president. Canadian women are looking for more,
00:19:45.240 more to themselves, their businesses, their elected leaders, and the world around them.
00:19:49.420 And that's why we're thrilled to introduce the Honest Talk podcast. I'm Jennifer Stewart.
00:19:54.060 And I'm Catherine Clark. And in this podcast, we interview Canada's most inspiring women,
00:19:59.200 entrepreneurs, artists, athletes, politicians, and newsmakers, all at different stages of their
00:20:04.460 journey. So if you're looking to connect, then we hope you'll join us. Listen to the Honest Talk
00:20:09.160 podcast on iHeartRadio or wherever you listen to your podcasts.
00:20:14.020 So here's my question, and this is a political one. There are people that are really frustrated
00:20:20.380 with so much that happened around COVID and the answers we didn't get and Fauci lying to Congress.
00:20:27.380 The list goes on and on. And there's people that are frustrated saying, all right, now that Republicans
00:20:31.840 are in charge, what are they going to do about it? Are they going to investigate? Are they going to hold
00:20:36.680 people accountable if they were lying to us, whether it's on the origins, whether it's like getting a
00:20:40.860 function research, there's a long list. Should Republicans go down that rabbit hole and do that?
00:20:47.980 Or is that going to be looked at by many Americans like, move on already? We've done this already.
00:20:53.000 What are you doing already? There's a real political price that you could pay from being
00:20:58.120 out of touch with what the American people want. I know there's people that are angry and are
00:21:01.320 frustrated. But what should the strategy be come January 20th? I think the strategy should be
00:21:07.280 serious transparency. And it should be accountability. It should be number one.
00:21:12.720 So you are in favor of accountability for people that lie to Congress. Okay.
00:21:17.680 So let me start with transparency. And this is a conversation I have had the last couple of
00:21:24.120 weeks with Pam Bondi, who's been nominated to be the attorney general, and with Cash Patel,
00:21:28.500 who's been nominated to be the director of the FBI, and also with the nominee for the deputy
00:21:32.740 attorney general, and with other senior law enforcement nominees. I've said very simply,
00:21:38.060 make the information public. Make it public on January 6th, the confidential informants that
00:21:45.720 were there. Don't give the names. Don't out, obviously, people who were undercover. But make
00:21:51.340 the information public. It is a public interest. And on COVID-19, put the evidence out there and make
00:21:57.720 it public. I believe China was directly culpable. And by the way, I will say this is a prediction
00:22:03.540 that verdict laid out almost before anybody else. We had two different podcasts, I believe, in March
00:22:12.700 and April of 2021, right at the very beginning of COVID, where we laid out the evidence that the
00:22:21.320 COVID virus came from a Chinese lab. And that evidence we're going to do for New Year's, we're
00:22:27.920 going to do an episode going through all of the predictions that verdict has laid out that have
00:22:32.240 come true. Because, look, we have not been shy on taking a risk, on making a prediction, making a
00:22:39.560 counterintuitive. Look, when I said COVID came from a Chinese virus at the time, that was almost
00:22:46.680 universally labeled misinformation. Oh, it was on social media. You couldn't post that. They'd shut
00:22:52.920 you down. It remains remarkable. To this day, I don't know why they didn't block verdict when we said it,
00:22:57.700 because others were getting blocked. Somehow we got through. And by the way, I will say it wasn't
00:23:09.180 just this scientist at the FBI. Let me go back to the Wall Street Journal article. Here's a couple
00:23:14.860 more paragraphs. Quote, three scientists at the National Center for Medical Intelligence,
00:23:20.200 part of the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency, conducted a scientific study that concluded
00:23:25.460 that COVID-19 was manipulated in a laboratory in a risky research effort. But that analysis was at
00:23:32.980 odds with the assessment of their parent agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and wasn't incorporated
00:23:38.660 in the report presented to Biden. The DIA Inspector General's office opened an inquiry in the spring into
00:23:45.060 whether the scientist's assessment was mishandled or suppressed, people familiar with the matter said.
00:23:50.940 And look, I think this is important. Number one, because we need truth and accountability. I think the Chinese
00:23:58.560 government bears enormous responsibility for the people who died, for the millions who died. 1.2 million Americans
00:24:07.560 are counted as having been killed with the coronavirus. 7 million people worldwide. It was a massive consequence,
00:24:17.320 and the economy shut down globally. Trillions of dollars was destroyed. Millions of lives,
00:24:25.000 trillions of dollars, and I believe the Chinese communist government has direct culpability for that.
00:24:31.140 And I think the Trump administration would be doing America and the world of service for making that evidence public.
00:24:38.300 But I also think it's important. Listen, there's going to be another crisis. We don't want career bureaucrats within the government
00:24:46.060 suppressing evidence that they don't like. We don't want career bureaucrats, the deep state, pushing their preferred narrative.
00:24:54.820 You got to ask why they were leaning in so hard to protect China. Why was that the dominant narrative?
00:25:01.540 And why was everything else shut down? Because the next crisis we face, let's go back to the Wall Street Journal article,
00:25:11.340 because we also saw the scientific community lean in like crazy. Here's another two paragraphs.
00:25:17.480 Talking about two theories, one that it came from an animal naturally, and the other that it came from a lab leak.
00:25:23.280 Quote,
00:25:23.520 Those two theories have also divided the scientific community. In February 2020,
00:25:28.620 more than two dozen scientists published a statement in the medical journal Lancet
00:25:32.500 calling the lab leak hypothesis a conspiracy theory
00:25:36.280 that would jeopardize global cooperation and the struggle against the virus.
00:25:40.960 One of the authors was Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance,
00:25:44.560 a nonprofit that has worked extensively on coronavirus research with the Wuhan Institute.
00:25:51.320 That statement was followed a month later by a March 2020 paper on the proximal origins of COVID-19,
00:25:57.980 in which Kristen Anderson of the Scripps Research Institute and four other scientists argued
00:26:02.580 that the virus wasn't purposely manipulated in the laboratory and almost certainly had natural origins.
00:26:09.420 Now, my view right now, based on the evidence that is public,
00:26:12.600 I think it is overwhelmingly likely
00:26:14.820 that the COVID virus escaped from a Chinese government lab.
00:26:19.520 And I think it is likely, I wouldn't use the word overwhelmingly,
00:26:23.420 but I think it is greater than 50 percent,
00:26:25.720 that the COVID virus was manipulated by those Chinese scientists
00:26:29.660 through gain-of-function research
00:26:31.200 to make it either more deadly,
00:26:34.640 more transmissible,
00:26:36.020 or more in particular
00:26:37.820 able to impact humans.
00:26:42.040 That has not been as conclusively proven
00:26:44.300 as has been proven in my judgment
00:26:46.720 that it escaped from a government lab.
00:26:48.620 It's possible it was a natural virus
00:26:50.420 and they screwed up
00:26:52.080 and it escaped.
00:26:53.340 It is indisputable
00:26:54.740 that China covered it up
00:26:55.960 and did everything they could
00:26:56.780 to suppress it after the fact.
00:26:58.320 But I think it is more likely than not
00:27:00.320 that not only did it escape
00:27:01.440 from a Chinese government lab,
00:27:02.660 but they created it
00:27:03.800 through gain-of-function research.
00:27:05.660 We need to know that.
00:27:07.240 And I got to say,
00:27:08.140 the paragraph I read,
00:27:09.900 Peter Daszak
00:27:10.660 got a whole lot of money
00:27:12.840 at the EcoHealth Alliance
00:27:14.060 for doing research
00:27:15.380 on coronavirus research
00:27:16.600 at the Wuhan Institute.
00:27:17.960 There's every reason to expect
00:27:19.660 he was deeply invested
00:27:21.440 in not having anyone know that.
00:27:23.660 And by the way,
00:27:24.340 so was Anthony Fauci.
00:27:25.620 And Anthony Fauci's culpability,
00:27:28.020 Daszak's culpability.
00:27:28.940 I hope we have congressional hearings on this.
00:27:31.260 I hope we get to the bottom
00:27:32.300 of what actually happened
00:27:33.400 because I think there is virtue
00:27:35.040 to transparency and clarity,
00:27:38.300 both for accountability
00:27:39.980 and responsibility
00:27:41.040 for the Chinese communist government,
00:27:42.680 but also to prevent
00:27:44.800 manipulating the science
00:27:46.080 for the next crisis.
00:27:47.600 So final question on this,
00:27:49.080 and that's going to come back to Fauci.
00:27:51.220 What does accountability look like
00:27:52.960 for a guy like that?
00:27:54.420 Look, I don't know.
00:27:55.520 I think it is likely
00:27:58.000 that Fauci lied to Congress under oath.
00:28:00.640 Lying to Congress under oath
00:28:01.840 is a felony.
00:28:03.100 I've called repeatedly.
00:28:04.000 I've asked Merrick Garland
00:28:05.320 if he's open an investigation,
00:28:07.200 if he's willing to prosecute Fauci.
00:28:09.340 Merrick Garland had no interest
00:28:10.480 in prosecuting Fauci.
00:28:12.000 As I'm sitting here right now,
00:28:13.400 I don't remember the dates.
00:28:14.560 I think it is likely
00:28:15.520 the statute of limitations
00:28:16.620 has expired on prosecuting him.
00:28:19.120 So it may be,
00:28:20.720 I'm not remembering the dates
00:28:22.600 as you and I are doing this right now,
00:28:23.820 but I think there's a good chance
00:28:25.160 that Trump cannot prosecute
00:28:27.060 Fauci for lying to Congress.
00:28:30.040 But I think laying out
00:28:31.380 that accountability is important.
00:28:32.860 And I think the reason
00:28:33.680 the Biden DOJ didn't want to do so
00:28:35.840 is because this has been
00:28:36.980 the most politicized
00:28:38.480 Department of Justice in history.
00:28:40.460 Fauci went before Congress
00:28:42.020 and insisted that
00:28:43.240 that the U.S. government
00:28:44.280 had not paid for,
00:28:46.200 had not funded
00:28:46.960 gain-of-function research.
00:28:48.200 And actually,
00:28:49.360 the NIH came back
00:28:50.540 and had to correct that
00:28:51.320 after the fact
00:28:52.020 and make clear
00:28:52.880 that what he said
00:28:53.580 was false.
00:28:55.160 Which this, by the way,
00:28:56.320 brings me to a perfect
00:28:58.120 segue to the second topic
00:29:00.960 I want to hit.
00:29:01.720 And the way
00:29:03.600 that you're talking
00:29:04.220 about accountability
00:29:05.020 maybe explains
00:29:07.120 why we are now seeing
00:29:08.860 Democrats
00:29:09.680 write articles
00:29:11.160 saying that it's time
00:29:13.540 to steal the election
00:29:14.400 from Donald Trump
00:29:15.380 in The Hill,
00:29:16.200 for example.
00:29:16.980 Congress has the power
00:29:18.280 to block Trump
00:29:19.180 from taking office,
00:29:21.060 but lawmakers must
00:29:22.260 quote,
00:29:22.940 act now.
00:29:24.400 This was an opinion
00:29:25.540 piece written
00:29:26.540 by two different individuals
00:29:27.900 demanding that the Democrats
00:29:30.020 refuse to accept
00:29:31.640 the outcome
00:29:32.280 of the election.
00:29:33.200 So much for the party
00:29:34.160 that's obsessed
00:29:34.720 with democracy, right?
00:29:36.280 Yeah, I gotta say
00:29:37.400 this is an article
00:29:38.600 that was in The Hill
00:29:39.540 that it came out again
00:29:40.520 on December 26th,
00:29:41.580 day after Christmas.
00:29:43.060 It is entitled,
00:29:44.220 Congress has the power
00:29:45.020 to block Trump
00:29:45.600 from taking office,
00:29:46.580 but lawmakers must
00:29:47.480 act now.
00:29:48.620 And it is by
00:29:49.360 Evan Davis
00:29:50.220 and David Schulte
00:29:52.380 who,
00:29:54.200 I don't know
00:29:54.800 either one of these
00:29:55.460 individuals,
00:29:56.020 I don't know anything
00:29:56.540 about them.
00:29:57.200 Their bio says,
00:29:59.720 Evan Davis was editor-in-chief
00:30:01.060 of the Columbia Law Review
00:30:02.020 and David Schulte
00:30:02.780 was editor-in-chief
00:30:03.640 of the Yale Law Journal.
00:30:05.220 Both clerked
00:30:05.840 for Justice Potter Stewart.
00:30:07.760 Davis is a New York lawyer
00:30:08.880 who served as president
00:30:09.660 of the New York City Bar
00:30:10.520 and Schulte is a Chicago
00:30:11.520 investment banker.
00:30:12.680 I don't know these guys,
00:30:14.200 but it's been a long time
00:30:15.540 since Potter Stewart
00:30:16.500 served on the court,
00:30:18.040 which means
00:30:18.540 these are not spring chickens.
00:30:20.020 They were law clerks
00:30:21.100 a long time ago.
00:30:23.340 I mean,
00:30:23.580 I clerked for Chief Justice
00:30:24.960 Rehnquist in 1996
00:30:26.940 and by the time
00:30:28.580 I was there,
00:30:29.180 Potter Stewart
00:30:29.660 had been long, long gone.
00:30:31.700 And I gotta say
00:30:32.400 the most screamingly
00:30:33.460 funny part of it is
00:30:34.540 they begin their bios
00:30:35.620 with they were editor-in-chief
00:30:36.680 of the Columbia Law Review
00:30:37.580 and the Yale Law Journal.
00:30:39.020 Like, I'm sorry,
00:30:40.060 these are presumably
00:30:41.000 accomplished lawyers
00:30:42.000 who are grown-ass adults
00:30:43.180 and they're quoting
00:30:44.460 the law review
00:30:45.620 they were on
00:30:46.340 when they were 24 years old.
00:30:48.440 That's just ridiculous.
00:30:50.020 And it actually,
00:30:52.720 it makes the rest
00:30:54.560 of the article make sense
00:30:55.880 because,
00:30:57.720 listen,
00:30:58.000 part of the reason
00:30:58.600 our academy
00:30:59.220 is so messed up
00:31:01.480 is you have people
00:31:03.660 who are disconnected
00:31:04.500 from reality
00:31:05.420 who are hardcore leftists.
00:31:07.600 Far too many people
00:31:08.580 in our universities
00:31:09.760 are openly Marxist.
00:31:12.740 When I was at Harvard Law School,
00:31:14.000 there were more professors
00:31:15.480 on the faculty
00:31:16.260 who were explicitly Marxist
00:31:18.260 than there were
00:31:19.500 who were Republican.
00:31:20.400 And it wasn't even close.
00:31:21.140 There were more than a dozen
00:31:22.480 by their own self-description
00:31:25.380 Marxist professors.
00:31:26.600 There was only one
00:31:27.680 open Republican
00:31:28.580 on the faculty
00:31:29.200 when I was there.
00:31:30.200 But what these two
00:31:32.120 numbskulls are arguing
00:31:33.360 is that Congress,
00:31:35.160 when we come together
00:31:36.060 on January 6th,
00:31:37.260 should block Trump
00:31:39.420 from becoming president
00:31:40.440 and we should do so,
00:31:41.560 they argue,
00:31:42.600 under the 14th Amendment
00:31:43.760 Section 3 of the Constitution
00:31:45.260 that says no person
00:31:46.760 shall hold any office,
00:31:48.180 civil or military,
00:31:49.180 who, having previously
00:31:49.980 taken an oath
00:31:50.620 to support the Constitution,
00:31:52.040 shall have engaged
00:31:52.720 in insurrection
00:31:53.320 or rebellion
00:31:54.360 against the same.
00:31:55.720 Now, they argue
00:31:57.120 this has been
00:31:58.180 disqualification.
00:32:00.420 The evidence of Trump's
00:32:01.340 engagement in insurrection
00:32:02.740 is overwhelming.
00:32:04.240 It has been decided
00:32:05.080 in three separate forums,
00:32:06.800 they write,
00:32:07.220 two of which
00:32:07.640 are fully contested
00:32:08.400 with the active participation
00:32:09.220 of Trump's counsel.
00:32:10.360 The first
00:32:11.220 was Trump's
00:32:12.280 second impeachment trial.
00:32:14.000 The second contested proceeding
00:32:16.200 was Colorado's
00:32:17.180 five-day
00:32:17.860 judicial due process
00:32:20.880 hearing
00:32:21.240 where they found
00:32:22.040 that Trump had engaged
00:32:23.160 in insurrection
00:32:23.720 and barred him
00:32:24.260 from the ballot.
00:32:25.220 And finally,
00:32:26.160 there is the bipartisan inquiry
00:32:27.560 of the House Select Committee
00:32:28.620 to investigate
00:32:29.300 January 6th.
00:32:30.960 Now,
00:32:32.020 the stupidity
00:32:33.140 of this argument
00:32:34.040 literally leaps off
00:32:35.260 of every syllable
00:32:36.040 of every word
00:32:36.800 that they have written.
00:32:37.960 Let's take the first.
00:32:39.640 Okay,
00:32:40.020 a bunch of partisan Democrats
00:32:41.600 impeach Trump
00:32:42.760 because they hate him.
00:32:44.300 And by the way,
00:32:44.760 to be clear,
00:32:45.360 verdict was launched
00:32:46.380 in response
00:32:47.440 not to the second impeachment
00:32:48.520 but in response
00:32:49.260 to the first impeachment trial
00:32:50.600 because we have seen
00:32:51.600 lawfare against Donald Trump.
00:32:54.040 Trump derangement syndrome
00:32:55.580 is real.
00:32:56.540 It is a serious mental illness.
00:32:58.500 These people are friggin' nuts.
00:33:00.140 They hate his guts.
00:33:01.320 They've lost their minds.
00:33:02.660 And at this point,
00:33:03.460 understand,
00:33:04.660 these two numbskulls
00:33:05.880 and every other Democrat
00:33:07.400 who engages in fantasy
00:33:10.500 about this
00:33:11.440 is an election denier
00:33:13.660 and an insurrectionist.
00:33:15.300 They are trying to say,
00:33:16.460 we don't care
00:33:16.880 that the voters voted.
00:33:17.840 We don't care
00:33:18.440 that the result
00:33:19.000 was overwhelming.
00:33:19.800 We don't care
00:33:20.500 that of the seven
00:33:21.580 contested battleground states,
00:33:23.380 Donald Trump won,
00:33:24.300 not one,
00:33:24.740 not two,
00:33:25.120 not three,
00:33:25.500 not four,
00:33:25.880 not five,
00:33:26.280 not six,
00:33:26.760 but seven,
00:33:27.600 all seven.
00:33:28.540 We don't care.
00:33:29.800 We are angry leftists
00:33:31.100 and their argument is
00:33:33.020 we should block it.
00:33:35.000 Now,
00:33:35.260 to be clear,
00:33:36.600 they said there were
00:33:37.240 three different proceedings
00:33:38.820 that had determined
00:33:39.560 he was an insurrectionist.
00:33:40.660 The first was
00:33:41.200 the impeachment trial.
00:33:41.980 Of course,
00:33:42.800 the impeachment trial
00:33:43.680 is two parts.
00:33:45.400 One is the impeachment
00:33:46.260 of the House of Representatives
00:33:47.340 and partisan Democrats
00:33:48.300 did impeach him,
00:33:49.000 but then it went to the Senate
00:33:49.900 and there was a trial.
00:33:51.280 And at the end of the trial,
00:33:52.380 Donald Trump was acquitted.
00:33:54.040 They ignore that fact.
00:33:55.020 It literally is not mentioned
00:33:56.020 in the Rop ad.
00:33:57.040 The second
00:33:57.740 is the Colorado,
00:33:59.700 the radical partisan decision
00:34:01.320 of the Colorado Supreme Court,
00:34:03.300 except for the fact
00:34:04.300 that the U.S. Supreme Court
00:34:05.720 unanimously
00:34:07.220 reversed that decision.
00:34:09.540 By the way,
00:34:09.860 that's another prediction
00:34:10.740 I made on this podcast.
00:34:12.560 When the Colorado Supreme Court
00:34:13.900 came back down,
00:34:14.940 I said this will be reversed
00:34:16.240 and it will be reversed
00:34:17.160 unanimously.
00:34:18.240 That's what the court did.
00:34:20.240 They barely acknowledged
00:34:22.220 the Supreme Court reversed it,
00:34:23.520 but they just kind of ignore it
00:34:24.520 and say,
00:34:24.720 well,
00:34:24.980 that's another way
00:34:25.720 it was determined
00:34:26.240 in a decision
00:34:27.120 that has been reversed
00:34:27.960 unanimously
00:34:28.740 by the Supreme Court.
00:34:30.360 And the third,
00:34:31.240 I really laugh,
00:34:32.180 is the, quote,
00:34:33.240 bipartisan inquiry
00:34:34.340 of the House Select Committee
00:34:35.380 to investigate January 6th.
00:34:37.240 Now, it's bipartisan
00:34:38.000 because Liz Cheney
00:34:39.640 and Adam Kinzinger,
00:34:40.600 two people fully afflicted
00:34:42.060 by Trump derangement syndrome,
00:34:43.180 were included.
00:34:43.960 Of course,
00:34:44.240 Nancy Pelosi allowed
00:34:45.320 no Republicans on it.
00:34:46.400 Who, by the way,
00:34:46.880 voted for Kamala Harris
00:34:48.460 and Joe Biden.
00:34:49.720 So let's not forget that.
00:34:51.040 But they're like,
00:34:51.520 oh,
00:34:51.780 they act like
00:34:52.420 they were Republicans.
00:34:53.380 No, they're not.
00:34:54.540 Look, to be clear,
00:34:55.520 and by the way,
00:34:56.060 both of them
00:34:56.560 also campaigned against me.
00:34:57.800 I was really grateful for it.
00:34:58.740 I think that was quite helpful.
00:34:59.740 Probably drove votes my way.
00:35:01.280 But to call
00:35:03.080 that inquiry bipartisan
00:35:04.960 when the way
00:35:07.120 committees are put together
00:35:08.980 on Capitol Hill
00:35:09.820 is that both sides pick,
00:35:13.340 the Republicans pick,
00:35:14.320 the Republicans on the committee,
00:35:15.400 the Democrats pick,
00:35:16.100 the Democrats on the committee.
00:35:17.440 Well, for the January 6th committee,
00:35:18.960 Nancy Pelosi said,
00:35:19.800 no, no, no.
00:35:20.720 I'm picking the Republicans.
00:35:22.480 And the only Republicans
00:35:23.520 I will allow on
00:35:24.660 are people who hate Donald Trump,
00:35:26.220 who are foaming at the mouth,
00:35:27.580 who will do everything they can
00:35:28.720 to destroy Donald Trump.
00:35:29.980 They're the only ones
00:35:30.860 I will allow on.
00:35:31.700 And so, you know,
00:35:34.100 when you had other Republicans
00:35:35.860 that Kevin McCarthy
00:35:36.720 was trying to put on,
00:35:37.980 Nancy Pelosi said,
00:35:38.600 nope, they are not welcome.
00:35:40.500 We only take Republicans
00:35:43.040 who agree with the Democrats
00:35:44.040 on everything.
00:35:44.900 That ain't a bipartisan inquiry.
00:35:46.660 And by the way,
00:35:47.340 we're getting more and more evidence
00:35:48.460 of just how skewed that was.
00:35:50.460 The point is,
00:35:51.960 at the end of the day,
00:35:53.020 it doesn't really matter
00:35:54.820 what this op-ed was
00:35:56.280 other than it is a window
00:35:58.180 into the eyes
00:35:59.440 of what the hard left is.
00:36:02.960 They hate Trump so much.
00:36:06.180 Sigmund Freud talked about projection
00:36:07.760 and the left engages
00:36:09.660 in projection all the time.
00:36:11.900 Everything they accuse
00:36:13.300 their enemies of doing
00:36:14.480 is what they are doing.
00:36:15.780 They claim to be
00:36:16.960 defending democracy.
00:36:18.900 This may be the most
00:36:20.140 anti-democratic article
00:36:22.540 I have ever read,
00:36:23.720 which is saying
00:36:25.200 that Congress should say,
00:36:26.540 I don't care
00:36:27.560 that the voters elected Trump.
00:36:29.020 And by the way,
00:36:29.700 they don't dispute
00:36:30.300 that the voters elect Trump.
00:36:31.400 They fully accept,
00:36:32.860 yes, the American people
00:36:34.280 came to vote
00:36:35.100 and want Donald Trump,
00:36:36.500 but we know better
00:36:37.760 than they do.
00:36:38.880 And so take a stand
00:36:41.040 and take a stand
00:36:43.060 to block
00:36:43.900 what the voters want.
00:36:45.160 Why?
00:36:45.620 Because we are Democrats
00:36:46.840 and we hate democracy.
00:36:48.620 They don't say that,
00:36:49.360 but that's clearly
00:36:49.880 what they can include.
00:36:51.300 Yeah, so much for the party of,
00:36:52.840 hey, we're all for
00:36:53.540 whatever the people want.
00:36:54.760 No, when it comes down to it,
00:36:56.100 this is what they do.
00:36:57.580 Don't forget,
00:36:58.220 we do a show
00:36:58.660 Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.
00:37:00.020 Hit that subscribe
00:37:00.720 or auto-download button
00:37:02.100 on those in-between days.
00:37:03.600 Grab my podcast,
00:37:04.820 the Ben Ferguson Podcast.
00:37:06.000 I'll keep you up to date
00:37:06.660 on what's going on
00:37:07.440 on those in-between days.
00:37:09.220 And we do this,
00:37:10.180 like I said,
00:37:10.560 Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.
00:37:11.420 So we will see you back here
00:37:12.780 in a couple of days.
00:37:14.760 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:37:17.640 Guaranteed Human.
00:37:18.240 Guaranteed Human.
00:37:18.360 Guaranteed Human.
00:37:19.240 Guaranteed Human.
00:37:20.240 Guaranteed Human.
00:37:21.240 Guaranteed Human.
00:37:22.240 Guaranteed Human.
00:37:23.240 Guaranteed Human.
00:37:24.240 Guaranteed Human.
00:37:25.240 Guaranteed Human.