00:01:28.600We are learning a lot more now in the bombshell Senate Judiciary hearing on Arctic Frost
00:01:34.340and exactly just how corrupt the Biden administration really was.
00:01:39.560Now, before I get into what the Senate Judiciary Committee told us today,
00:01:44.580let me just remind you what Arctic Frost was all about.
00:01:48.460It was the internal code name tied to that federal investigation effort that was launched during the Biden-era Department of Justice, an operation that, according to multiple whistleblowers and internal memos, now is coming to light.
00:02:04.280It was designed to track and build cases tied to election-related activity, political organizing, and what officials labeled as domestic extremism risk networks.
00:02:16.980Now, on paper, it was framed as a national security initiative, but the reality was it was all about doing political surveillance on Donald Trump and many of his allies.
00:02:31.040And now, thanks to the Senate Judiciary hearing, we're getting a much clearer picture of what was really going on behind the scenes.
00:02:38.760The hearing turned into nothing short of a political earthquake.
00:02:43.140Senators revealed new testimony and internal communications tied directly to Special Counsel Jack Smith
00:02:49.520and what he allegedly demanded during the height of Arctic Frost and the operation.
00:02:56.640Now, according to the documents that were presented during the hearing,
00:03:01.920Smith pushed for expanded authority to subpoena communications tied not just to suspects,
00:03:09.000but to broader networks of individuals.
00:03:13.220He reportedly advocated for aggressive timelines,
00:03:17.620demanding prosecutors move faster than traditional thresholds would normally allow.
00:03:24.360And most explosively, lawmakers revealed discussions suggesting an effort
00:03:30.080to directly link political speech and organizing activity to potential criminal exposure.
00:03:37.620Let me say that again. This wasn't just about investigating crimes. They wanted you to believe that. But what it was actually about was weaponizing and redefining what could be considered a crime to lock up Donald Trump and his allies.
00:03:54.520Now, according to testimony, Smith wanted broader use of material witness warrants, even in cases where individuals had not been charged.
00:04:07.160That is what you call a phishing exploration, hoping to find a crime with no crime that had actually been committed that you knew about.
00:04:15.600He supported also using digital surveillance tools to map associations between the political activists that he wanted to go after.
00:04:27.220That was the tree connected to Donald Trump at the top.
00:04:31.360And he reportedly pushed the Department of Justice teams to build cases, as he described it, outward.
00:04:38.680meaning start first with a target aka donald trump or one of his associates and then expand
00:04:46.980the net until something actionable is found or appeared this is a stunning admission by those
00:04:56.720at the hearing making it clear that yes they didn't know of any crimes have been committed
00:05:02.260by trump or anyone around him they instead just said we're going to pick someone and then
00:05:08.520find a crime that we can charge them with to shut them down politically this literally flips the
00:05:15.040entire justice system on its head now in america you investigate a crime and then find a suspect
00:05:21.840but not under the biden administration or regime they picked the target first then went looking
00:05:28.920for a crime that they could create out of thin air yes this is a grotesque abuse of power
00:05:36.600Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee did not hold back.
00:05:42.100They described Arctic Frost as a weaponized pipeline inside the DOJ,
00:05:47.300a system that allowed federal prosecutors to test legal theories on political opponents,
00:05:52.480and a framework that risked turning the justice system into a tool of intimidation.
00:05:58.960Several senators pointed to internal language,
00:06:02.220suggesting that traditional safeguards, probable cause, evidentiary thresholds,
00:06:09.540prosecutorial restraints were seen as quote-unquote just obstacles
00:06:14.000rather than protections of those that are innocent.
00:06:18.720And that's where the abuse of power argument became central.
00:06:22.360Because if federal authority is used not just to enforce the law
00:06:26.540but to reinterpret it and apply it selectively,
00:06:30.240then you don't just have a legal issue you have a constitutional one now president trump responded
00:06:37.360swiftly and forcefully in remarks following the hearing trump described the revelations as
00:06:43.100one of the most dangerous abuse of powers ever uncovered in washington president trump didn't
00:06:50.480stop there he also went on to say that arctic frost was a coordinated effort to silence political
00:06:56.700opposition under the guise of law enforcement. Trump also reiterated a court argument he made
00:07:03.380repeatedly. The federal agencies were turned against the American people. And that was clearly
00:07:10.160revealed in the hearing. And it proves the system was rigged at the highest levels. Now, if you want
00:07:16.020to know just how political this was, I want you to take a listen to this part of the shocking
00:07:22.300amount of data that came out. Senator Cruz confirming that Biden's FBI wiretapped the
00:07:30.360current White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles during a privileged call with her lawyer without
00:07:37.980the consent of either party. Yes, so much for client privilege with your attorney. No, they
00:07:46.760said, we don't care. We want to listen in because we're trying to find anything we can on Donald
00:07:53.180Trump. Jack Smith issued nearly 200 subpoenas. Is that correct? Yes. Those subpoenas targeted over
00:08:02.960400 Republican individuals and organizations, correct? Correct. Many of whom had no connection
00:08:09.300to those who entered the Capitol on January 6th, correct? Absolutely. And in fact, some of those
00:08:15.680organizations didn't even exist on January 6th. Is that correct? It is. So we're not talking about
00:08:21.980a narrow investigation. We're talking about a sweeping operation targeting virtually the
00:08:27.780entirety of the other side politically. It was a fishing expedition. So let's turn to the
00:08:34.200Constitution. Subpoenaing the toll records of members of Congress, does that raise serious
00:08:38.480constitutional concerns? Absolutely. And in fact, we have the PIN who notified the special
00:08:45.000Counsel's Office of those concerns. And Jack Smith had apparently said that he was going to
00:08:52.000consult with the Solicitor General, according to the release of the information from Senator
00:09:00.320Grassley this morning. Yet when he was deposed by the House and was specifically asked if he
00:09:06.660spoke with the Solicitor General. He said, on this discreet issue, no.
00:09:14.160Among other issues, it raises significant issues with the speech and debate clause, correct?
00:09:52.040When the federal government subpoenas, donor lists, internal communications, organization records, does that implicate the First Amendment and also Freedom Association in particular?
00:10:05.420It does, and the Supreme Court made that clear in the NAACP case.
00:10:10.780Mr. Chamberlain, aside from the legal violations, what specific crimes, if any, were actually uncovered as a result of the Arctic Frost investigation?
00:10:23.540I'm not aware of any crimes that were uncovered.
00:10:26.780Would the senators, donors, organizations and individuals who were surveilled and subpoenaed have ever learned about the Arctic Frost investigation had Trump not won in 2024?
00:10:37.580for probably not uh mainly because of these non-disclosure orders uh but also i mean the
00:10:44.400fact that a lot of these records are we're now just learning about them because they were in
00:10:47.800these prohibited access files only available to their fbi director so if the fbi director was a
00:10:52.480democrat there's no reason to think we know about them how would you compare the scope uh of the
00:10:58.900violations in arctic frost to watergate i i think if anything it might even be greater uh i mean
00:11:05.820the scope of this in terms of the sheer number of people and organizations affected um and as i
00:11:11.460discussed i mean this brazen violation of attorney-client privilege wiretapping a phone call
00:11:15.740between suzy wiles and her lawyer um these are egregious offenses and and you know if watergate
00:11:21.500was just about a single break-in i mean this is effectively you know compound that by 200.
00:11:26.480you may have heard that shocking revelation no crimes were found in operation arctic frost
00:11:33.400because it wasn't about crimes it was about framing your political opponent and trying to
00:11:39.880entrap them and charge them with crimes that you made out of thin air senator cruz wrapped it up
00:11:45.460perfectly when he said this at the judiciary hearing watergate was about a handful of files
00:11:51.140in a single office this reached into tens of thousands of private communications emails
00:11:57.520records, and personal data. Toll records, bank records, donor lists, law firm records,
00:12:06.500and other personal files relating to every major conservative organization were subpoenaed.
00:12:13.780That is a perfect example of just how widespread the abuse of power really was. And now the
00:12:21.300question is, will those that abuse their power be held to account? That's exactly what the
00:12:26.800Judiciary Committee seems to be working towards. And not only were they going after the president,
00:12:32.580they were also going after major conservative organizations, Turning Point USA, America First
00:12:40.580Policy Institute, even the Republican National Committee. So this may be just the tip of the
00:12:47.540iceberg. Thank you for listening to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson. Please make sure you hit
00:12:53.600subscribe wherever you're listening to this podcast right now and for more in-depth news
00:12:58.980also subscribe to the ben ferguson podcast and we will see you back here tomorrow
00:13:03.880this is an iheart podcast guaranteed human