Illegal Immigrants Overrun National Guard, Cartels Launch Tens of Thousands of Drones into U.S. & NY Tries to Take a Half Billion from Trump with NO Appeal
00:01:07.760And finally, we're going to talk about an investigation that has been opened in the House of Representatives as to whether the IRS is using artificial intelligence to surveil you,
00:01:19.840to go after your personal and private financial information, all of that in this episode.
00:01:26.080I want to tell you real quick about our friends over at AmmoSquared.
00:01:28.980AmmoSquared helps you stock up on ammunition automatically.
00:01:32.880Ammo is delivered on demand or automatically when you need it, when you want it.
00:01:38.060And it's stored for free when you don't.
00:01:40.780It is a unique way to invest in ammunition.
00:01:43.640You can buy low and dollar cost average over time.
00:01:47.520And then you can cash out when prices rise without ever taking delivery of any physical ammunition.
00:01:54.240This company was founded over eight years ago in the freedom-loving state of Idaho.
00:14:25.660They can be very effective for surveillance.
00:14:27.980They're also used – and you rightly noted another way the cartels are using it right now, which is to transport drugs,
00:14:33.600that you can put fentanyl, you can put meth, you can put cocaine or heroin, you can put it on a drone,
00:14:40.220use the drone to fly across the river, and then to land, to go to someone from the cartel that is in the United States to receive those drugs.
00:14:48.820And so the cartels are using that as well as a means of drug delivery.
00:14:53.700But there's also, on top of that, they can be used as an offensive weapon.
00:14:57.940They can be used – we see drones in combat theaters that have weapons mounted on them.
00:19:47.060The A.G. James, who said, vote for me and I'll go after Trump, has now asked the court to deny Donald Trump's $454 million bond appeal.
00:19:58.620This is unprecedented in American society.
00:20:01.520This is what would happen in communist countries.
00:20:03.920Yet it's happening right now in America.
00:20:05.940Well, we are seeing across the country Democrat prosecutors abusing the justice system to try to, number one, destroy Donald Trump, but to try to, number two, subvert democracy.
00:20:19.160They are terrified that the voters in November will vote to re-elect Donald Trump.
00:20:23.220And so they want to abuse their power to stop the voters from doing that.
00:20:28.880What Letitia James has done, she ran for attorney general promising, I'm going to get Trump.
00:20:33.920And I'll say, at least so far, she's delivered on that promise.
00:20:37.560She went after him with everything she had in a fraud case that is under a New York statute that is really a ridiculous statute because she alleged fraud with no victims.
00:20:50.240She alleged that he had borrowed hundreds of millions of dollars from sophisticated banks like Deutsche Bank.
00:20:59.180In fact, they made money on the loans.
00:21:00.800Trump repaid the loans and Deutsche Bank said they were thrilled to make the loans and would happily make them again.
00:21:06.780And the argument was that he valued his real estate more than it was worth.
00:21:11.920Deutsche Bank is not some like poor little old lady who's a vulnerable consumer.
00:21:17.940They're a multi-billion dollar global bank.
00:21:20.360They valued the real estate on their own damn thing.
00:21:22.720You know, if I come in and tell my mortgage company, hey, my home is worth $10 million, they're going to send their own appraiser to go figure out what my home is worth.
00:21:33.380So, an alleged offense with no victim, no injury, and no harm, the judgment with interest is $454 million, half a billion dollars.
00:21:48.820And then New York has a provision that you see in a number of states that to appeal that, you've got to put the $454 million in cash, either liquid.
00:21:59.700So, either cash or security is liquid.
00:22:01.540Or you have to have a bond that covers that amount.
00:22:07.720And so, Trump went and tried to get a bond, and he went to 30 different surety companies, and all of them turned him down.
00:22:15.360And he filed an affidavit, so he's raised an issue on appeal to say, look, you can't require me to put up a half billion dollars just to be able to appeal.
00:22:26.480And Letitia James just opposed that and said, oh, yeah, he doesn't put that money up, we're coming to take his property.
00:22:33.300So, understand what she wants to do, and she wants to do this as soon as potentially next week.
00:22:37.920She wants to show up and physically seize his properties, literally go and seize properties that he has in New York or elsewhere.
00:22:47.860It could literally come down to her trying to essentially put a padlock on Trump Tower.
00:22:54.060And I say that not really with hyperbole, because this is a political jihad for her.
00:23:00.580So, I think she will look for the most visible, political way to attack her opponent.
00:23:07.080And here's what Trump's lawyers told the New York appellate court.
00:23:13.340The attorneys wrote that, quote, it is not possible under the circumstances presented.
00:23:17.500They said the underwriters insisted on cash or other liquid assets instead of real estate as collateral.
00:23:25.060So, Trump has lots of real estate, but apparently the underwriters said, no, it's got to be cash or liquid, and he didn't have a half billion dollars sitting around.
00:23:32.920And they insisted on cash to cover 120% of the judgment, which is $557 million.
00:23:41.060An insurance broker, Gary Giuletti, wrote in a sworn statement that, quote, a bond of this size is rarely, if ever, seen.
00:23:53.940And Letitia James responded, well, no, no, that's not true.
00:23:58.300There have been billion-dollar bonds before.
00:24:01.040Yes, for massive public corporations, but Trump's business is not a public corporation.
00:24:06.180It is a private company, and to get a half-billion-dollar bond is incredibly difficult.
00:24:16.420If Trump is not able to post this bond, the effect would be to deny him the right to even appeal the absurd partisan decision from the district court.
00:24:28.700I've got to say this is such a profound abuse.
00:24:32.320Now, that doesn't mean Trump would be out of options, because if the New York courts insist you've got to put up a half-billion dollars in order to appeal this decision,
00:24:41.840I am confident that Trump will appeal that and potentially appeal that all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
00:24:48.400And the U.S. Supreme Court, he would have multiple arguments, constitutional arguments, including the Constitution prohibits denying an individual, depriving an individual of property without due process of law.
00:25:02.540And there would be an argument that this is such an excessive bond that it constitutes a violation of due process.
00:25:10.200He would also have an argument under the Eighth Amendment.
00:25:12.960The Eighth Amendment specifies excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
00:25:22.800Now, the Eighth Amendment typically applies in a criminal context, but given the magnitude here, I would expect him to make both an Eighth Amendment argument and a due process argument.
00:25:35.160And it is entirely possible that would prevail ultimately.
00:25:39.400But what New York is doing, what the New York Attorney General is doing, is the conduct of a banana republic.
00:25:49.620Kevin O'Leary, who many people know from Shark Tank, not the most political guy, he talked about the business fallout of this and asking where are the adults in the room because we can't let this stand in the United States of America.
00:26:03.140Here's part of what he said, which I thought was really interesting.
00:26:06.000But more importantly, the message about the American brand, you think about America, the reason this is the number one economy on Earth is that we have laws and we have due process and we have property rights.
00:26:18.180It attracts foreign capital from all around the world.
00:26:21.360All of that is being shaken to the core here.
00:26:24.620The concept of seizing assets in 30 days on a bond number that's never been issued, no insurance bond companies ever issued anything near this.
00:26:34.040So there was no chance it was going to happen.
00:26:36.680And only giving 30 days notice in time, that's a really bad message.
00:26:43.360And I think New Yorkers should think, well, pass Trump.
00:26:46.700Whether he's president or not, or whether this attorney general is gone in four years or not, it's irrelevant.
00:26:52.800This is case setting against the American brand.
00:26:56.800The most stable country on Earth anywhere to put capital to work over a long period of time, particularly in real estate, is the United States of America.
00:27:06.240This is an assault on what we believe to be core.
00:29:01.040But this precedent can apply to anyone.
00:29:04.600If simply claiming that you overstated the value of your real estate gives the attorney general the justification to seize hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, what real estate developer in their right mind would continue to do business?
00:29:20.900Every real estate developer, just as a starting point, is subject to this kind of shakedown.
00:29:26.580And if you don't think that Letitia James or the next ambitious attorney general will use that power, then you're smoking something.
00:29:44.720And so if she wants to negotiate a settlement, suppose she comes in, that gives this politician the ability to terrorize businesses, to terrorize foreign corporations.
00:29:56.100Anyone that they decide we don't like, it essentially empowers the politicians to terrorize individuals and companies and force them to comply with whatever their demand is, or else we will seize your assets and you can't even appeal it.
00:30:16.320And yet, why is not a single Democrat in New York worried about this or speaking out about it?
00:30:34.800Jim Jordan has announced he's opened up an investigation to accusations the IRS is using AI to spy on taxpayers.
00:30:45.320I would love to say I'm surprised by this, Senator, but we've seen the IRS go after conservative groups and Tea Party groups and others in the past, and no one really got in trouble for that.
00:30:56.800So why would it be any different this time?
00:31:01.280So we have a pair of letters that was sent to the Treasury Secretary and to the Attorney General.
00:31:06.780One was sent by Jim Jordan, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and another one was sent by Harriet Hageman from Wyoming.
00:31:14.280And it is examining whether the IRS is using artificial intelligence to surveil American taxpayers.
00:31:23.100And in the letters, they describe how the IRS put out a press release in 2023 saying that artificial intelligence, quote,
00:31:33.620will help IRS compliance teams better detect tax cheating, identify emerging compliance threats, and improve case selection tools to avoid burdening taxpayers with needless no-change audits.
00:31:50.580And the letter from Jordan and Hageman continues, quote,
00:31:55.180However, recent reporting alleges that the IRS's use of AI has also included actively monitoring American citizens' bank accounts en masse and without legal process.
00:32:10.060And they cite a report from James O'Keefe, and the video footage from James O'Keefe captures an individual named Alex Mina,
00:32:21.400who's an IRS official working in the agency's criminal investigations unit, who admits, and this is a quote, I'm going to quote from the letter, quote,
00:32:31.000Video footage obtained by an investigative media outlet appears to capture Alex Mina, an IRS official working in the agency's criminal investigations unit,
00:32:40.220admitting that the IRS has a new system that uses AI to target potential abusers by examining all returns, bank statements,
00:32:51.120and related financial information, and related financial information for potential for fraud.
00:32:56.880And Mina asserted that the new AI system has the ability to access and monitor all the information from all the companies in the world.
00:33:08.120I mean, the amount of power that the IRS has, not just to spy on people, but to come after people for their political viewpoints.
00:33:15.600And everybody's like, oh, it never has happened. They don't do that.
00:33:18.200We know that from Tea Party groups in the past.