Verdict with Ted Cruz - January 22, 2022


Predictions Come True

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
Who Is Ray Epps? Only Black Women Need Apply

Episode Stats


Length

43 minutes

Words per minute

175.96

Word count

7,605

Sentence count

661

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

37

sentences flagged

Hate speech

10

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is taking a case to the Supreme Court that he's actually bringing himself. And we're in the mood for a celebration. It's the two-year anniversary of Verdict with Ted Cruz and we're here to celebrate.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.420 Guaranteed Human.
00:00:03.920 It is the official two-year anniversary
00:00:08.220 of Verdict with Ted Cruz.
00:00:10.900 We've just gotten a major win in the Supreme Court.
00:00:15.260 We've gotten a major win in the United States Senate.
00:00:19.340 There's a new, very important First Amendment case
00:00:21.760 going to the Supreme Court
00:00:22.780 that Senator Ted Cruz is actually bringing himself.
00:00:26.300 And we are in the mood to celebrate.
00:00:28.960 This is Verdict with Ted Cruz.
00:00:37.020 This episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz
00:00:39.260 is brought to you by American Hartford Gold.
00:00:41.200 I'm sure I'm not the only one who's noticed
00:00:42.660 everything is getting expensive.
00:00:44.440 We are in the biggest economic crisis since 2008
00:00:46.900 with a government that's printing trillions
00:00:49.260 and trillions of dollars.
00:00:50.740 Consumer prices are the highest we've seen in 30 years.
00:00:53.500 Inflation is certainly here to stay.
00:00:55.320 And if the government continues
00:00:56.640 its out-of-control printing and spending,
00:00:58.320 the dollar could continue its freefall
00:01:00.900 and lose its coveted role as the world reserve currency.
00:01:03.960 So how do you protect your money,
00:01:05.700 your retirement, your savings?
00:01:07.460 Well, American Hartford Gold can show you
00:01:09.220 how to hedge your hard-earned savings against inflation
00:01:11.760 by helping you diversify a portion of your portfolio
00:01:14.400 into physical gold and silver.
00:01:16.960 They'll even help you move your existing IRA or 401k
00:01:19.660 out of the volatile stock market
00:01:21.180 into a precious metals IRA.
00:01:23.340 And they make it easy.
00:01:24.360 They're the highest-rated firm in the country
00:01:25.800 with an A-plus rating from the Better Business Bureau
00:01:28.020 and thousands of satisfied clients.
00:01:30.220 And if you call them right now,
00:01:31.500 they will give you up to $1,500 of free silver
00:01:34.740 on your first qualifying order.
00:01:36.360 So don't wait.
00:01:37.320 Call them now.
00:01:38.380 Call 855-768-1883.
00:01:42.020 That's 855-768-1883.
00:01:45.520 Or text CACTUS to 65532.
00:01:48.960 Again, that's 855-768-1883.
00:01:53.140 Or text CACTUS to 65532.
00:01:56.940 This episode of Verdict is also brought to you by Stamps.com.
00:02:00.380 If you've got a small business,
00:02:01.860 you know there's nothing more valuable than your time.
00:02:04.220 So stop wasting it on trips to the post office.
00:02:07.040 Stamps.com makes it easy to mail and ship
00:02:09.200 right from your computer.
00:02:11.000 Save time and money with Stamps.com.
00:02:12.620 Send letters and packages for less
00:02:14.680 with discounted rates for USPS, UPS, and more.
00:02:18.500 Since 1998, Stamps.com has been an indispensable tool
00:02:21.820 for nearly 1 million businesses.
00:02:24.140 Stamps.com brings the services of the U.S. Postal Service
00:02:26.940 and UPS shipping right to your computer.
00:02:29.800 Whether you're an office sending invoices,
00:02:31.940 a side hustle Etsy shop,
00:02:33.420 or a full-blown warehouse shipping out orders,
00:02:35.860 Stamps.com will make your life easier.
00:02:38.400 All you need is a computer and a standard printer.
00:02:40.200 No supplies, no special supplies or equipment.
00:02:42.800 Within minutes, you're up and running,
00:02:44.740 printing official postage for any letter,
00:02:47.060 any package, anywhere you want to send.
00:02:49.580 And you'll get exclusive discounts on postage and shipping
00:02:52.000 from USPS and UPS.
00:02:54.180 Once your mail is ready,
00:02:55.160 you just schedule a pickup or drop it off.
00:02:57.240 No traffic, no lines.
00:02:58.700 Cut the confusion out of shipping.
00:03:00.420 With Stamps.com's new rate advisor tool,
00:03:02.180 you can compare shipping rates.
00:03:03.440 So save time and money with Stamps.com.
00:03:05.460 There's no risk.
00:03:06.320 And with our promo code, Verdict,
00:03:08.020 you get a special offer that includes
00:03:09.720 a four-week trial plus free postage
00:03:11.860 and a digital scale.
00:03:12.860 No long-term commitments or contracts.
00:03:14.880 Just go to Stamps.com,
00:03:16.360 click on the microphone at the top of the homepage,
00:03:18.260 and type in Verdict.
00:03:19.480 That's Stamps.com, promo code Verdict.
00:03:22.240 Welcome back to Verdict with Ted Cruz.
00:03:24.520 I'm Michael Knowles.
00:03:25.820 Senator, nothing's ever perfect in politics.
00:03:29.640 There are some losses.
00:03:30.840 There are some dangers.
00:03:31.840 There are some threats.
00:03:33.500 This has been a good week. 0.95
00:03:34.800 It has been a damn good week. 0.62
00:03:37.140 The biggest win, 0.97
00:03:38.420 before we get into the case
00:03:39.760 that you are actually bringing
00:03:41.120 to the Supreme Court,
00:03:42.680 before we get into that,
00:03:43.800 before we get into the filibuster,
00:03:45.320 which lives, lives to see another day,
00:03:48.020 the OSHA mandate.
00:03:48.960 Yeah.
00:03:49.560 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration
00:03:51.660 was demanding that 84 million Americans
00:03:53.760 take the Fauci-ouchie,
00:03:55.400 as some of us call it,
00:03:56.220 the COVID vaccine.
00:03:58.620 Employers were enforcing it.
00:04:00.620 Some people brought a lawsuit.
00:04:02.620 One of the groups was the Daily Wire.
00:04:04.200 We bring a lawsuit,
00:04:05.560 and the Supreme Court strikes,
00:04:07.560 effectively strikes down the mandate.
00:04:10.460 Yeah.
00:04:10.660 No, it was a huge victory for the rule of law.
00:04:12.920 It was a very important case.
00:04:14.600 When the OSHA mandate came out,
00:04:16.400 we talked about it a lot on this podcast.
00:04:18.800 Your employer, the Daily Wire,
00:04:20.280 filed a lawsuit.
00:04:21.040 It was a party in the suit.
00:04:22.340 So we're actually sitting here,
00:04:23.640 both of us,
00:04:24.840 are parties in Supreme Court cases
00:04:27.220 this past week.
00:04:29.320 The OSHA case was huge.
00:04:31.140 And when it came out,
00:04:32.480 we had a podcast at the time
00:04:33.800 where we walked through the legal standards
00:04:35.620 for OSHA promulgating a rule like that.
00:04:38.720 And you'll recall,
00:04:39.860 we said on the pod,
00:04:41.000 we said,
00:04:42.260 number one,
00:04:43.000 we said the Supreme Court's going to strike it down.
00:04:44.880 And in fact,
00:04:45.460 when you and I talked about it,
00:04:46.620 when the case was being argued,
00:04:49.200 I said,
00:04:49.580 I think the decision will be 6-3.
00:04:51.260 I think there will be six votes
00:04:52.420 to strike it down
00:04:53.400 as beyond OSHA's statutory authority,
00:04:56.280 beyond the authority of the federal government.
00:04:59.460 And we also talked about Ron Klain,
00:05:02.040 who was the White House,
00:05:03.200 is the White House chief of staff, 1.00
00:05:04.900 who stupidly sent a tweet 0.99
00:05:07.500 right when the OSHA mandate issued, 0.99
00:05:10.680 where he retweeted
00:05:11.740 that this was a workaround
00:05:13.120 to get around the law.
00:05:15.700 And you'll recall,
00:05:16.620 I talked about,
00:05:17.300 I tweeted at the time
00:05:18.320 and said, 0.98
00:05:18.660 this was really dumb. 0.99
00:05:20.200 And I promise you, 0.99
00:05:21.620 number one,
00:05:23.320 this edict is going to be challenged.
00:05:25.700 Number two,
00:05:26.240 I believe it's going to be struck down in court.
00:05:28.260 And number three, 1.00
00:05:29.460 this idiotic tweet from Ron Klain 1.00
00:05:31.660 is going to be exhibit A in the lawsuit. 1.00
00:05:34.960 And the Supreme Court's decision,
00:05:36.600 6-3 striking it down,
00:05:37.900 what did they cite among other things?
00:05:39.540 Ron Klain's tweet.
00:05:40.400 This seems to be a workaround
00:05:42.240 and that's not legit.
00:05:43.660 So I read the opinion of the court.
00:05:46.360 I read the concurring opinion
00:05:48.400 of the court's conservatives,
00:05:50.320 the three,
00:05:51.040 Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch.
00:05:52.860 And I read the liberal dissent.
00:05:57.640 This is obviously all great news,
00:05:59.340 but it was a little confusing.
00:06:00.580 I'm not a lawyer.
00:06:01.560 I have no,
00:06:02.040 so they were,
00:06:02.880 they stayed the mandate
00:06:05.400 and then they sent the mandate
00:06:06.760 back to the lower court.
00:06:07.980 But okay,
00:06:08.360 so what does that mean?
00:06:08.920 So what they did
00:06:09.680 is they upheld the injunction.
00:06:11.160 So the mandate is enjoined.
00:06:12.520 An injunction is an order from a court
00:06:14.340 either to do something
00:06:15.740 or not to do something.
00:06:16.900 So the injunction
00:06:17.800 means the mandate
00:06:18.960 has no legal force.
00:06:20.440 Okay.
00:06:20.580 But they remanded it
00:06:22.240 to the lower court
00:06:23.560 to have a trial,
00:06:24.760 to consider the claims
00:06:26.140 challenging the mandate.
00:06:28.000 But the reason why
00:06:29.440 this is really good,
00:06:32.380 one of the grounds
00:06:33.540 for upholding the injunction
00:06:34.800 is likelihood of success
00:06:36.760 on the merits.
00:06:37.540 So six justices have said
00:06:39.320 the plaintiffs
00:06:40.360 are likely to succeed.
00:06:41.840 They haven't conclusively said
00:06:44.160 their claims are valid,
00:06:45.080 but they've said
00:06:45.800 they're likely to succeed
00:06:47.020 on the merits.
00:06:47.660 that the OSHA mandate
00:06:51.000 for all intents and purposes
00:06:52.500 is dead.
00:06:55.480 Unfortunately,
00:06:56.040 there was a second decision
00:06:57.220 that came out the same day.
00:06:59.020 And that second decision
00:07:00.840 was 5-4
00:07:03.080 upholding a different vaccine mandate,
00:07:05.600 the vaccine mandate
00:07:06.580 that the Biden administration
00:07:08.440 put on healthcare workers.
00:07:09.860 And it put on healthcare workers
00:07:11.700 in facilities
00:07:12.500 that are receiving federal funds
00:07:14.160 either through Medicare
00:07:15.540 or Medicaid.
00:07:16.080 and that was 5-4.
00:07:19.260 It consisted of
00:07:20.860 the three liberals
00:07:21.700 plus Chief Justice Roberts
00:07:23.500 plus Brett Kavanaugh
00:07:25.520 were the five.
00:07:27.660 And, you know,
00:07:28.440 we talked about before
00:07:29.720 the Supreme Court's decision
00:07:31.100 coming out of New York
00:07:32.000 with healthcare workers
00:07:33.060 where they had refused
00:07:34.600 to stay the decision
00:07:36.100 out of New York.
00:07:37.220 I think that was a mistake.
00:07:38.680 I think this was a mistake.
00:07:40.600 But, look,
00:07:42.100 the three libs,
00:07:43.200 they like all these mandates.
00:07:44.180 It's apparently that Biden
00:07:45.700 can mandate us
00:07:46.600 to do whatever we want
00:07:47.820 to dance on one leg
00:07:49.300 in a pink tutu
00:07:50.280 while singing Yankee Doodle Dandy.
00:07:52.740 The libs more or less
00:07:53.900 say that in the dissent.
00:07:55.360 They say there's basically
00:07:56.380 no limit to what the government
00:07:57.880 can do in this regard.
00:07:59.980 Roberts and Kavanaugh
00:08:01.440 on healthcare workers,
00:08:03.800 they're pretty comfortable
00:08:04.600 with the federal government
00:08:05.760 or the state government.
00:08:06.740 The New York case
00:08:07.380 was a state government issue.
00:08:08.620 Here it's the federal government.
00:08:09.640 But they're pretty comfortable
00:08:10.600 with the federal government
00:08:11.600 forcing state workers,
00:08:13.860 state healthcare workers
00:08:14.800 or just healthcare workers
00:08:15.940 generally,
00:08:16.640 who are receiving
00:08:17.820 government money
00:08:18.640 to have to
00:08:19.600 have to get vaccinated.
00:08:23.000 I think that was
00:08:23.580 a serious mistake.
00:08:24.820 I think they're undervaluing
00:08:26.380 the liberty interest
00:08:27.920 of these
00:08:29.020 these healthcare workers.
00:08:30.580 Because I had this question
00:08:31.560 when I saw Kavanaugh
00:08:32.720 squish
00:08:33.560 and flip to the other side.
00:08:34.920 I thought, well,
00:08:36.040 do do healthcare workers
00:08:37.360 not have the same rights
00:08:38.360 as every other employee?
00:08:39.720 So you remember,
00:08:40.220 we talked about
00:08:40.920 that there are four
00:08:41.660 different mandates
00:08:42.340 that came out.
00:08:43.040 There's a mandate
00:08:43.600 for military servicemen
00:08:46.440 and women. 0.98
00:08:46.980 There's a mandate
00:08:47.440 for civilian employees.
00:08:48.660 There's a mandate
00:08:49.060 for federal contractors.
00:08:50.140 There's a mandate
00:08:50.700 for private employers
00:08:52.040 with 100 or more employees
00:08:53.160 under OSHA.
00:08:53.880 Yeah.
00:08:54.520 And I said,
00:08:55.280 they're all in
00:08:56.580 descending likelihood
00:08:59.140 of surviving.
00:09:00.920 Yeah.
00:09:01.400 So the OSHA order
00:09:03.160 was always the most
00:09:04.440 vulnerable legally
00:09:05.240 because the OSHA statute
00:09:06.780 doesn't allow this.
00:09:08.200 This is really
00:09:09.680 a far stretch
00:09:12.300 from what Congress
00:09:13.060 intended on in OSHA,
00:09:14.360 which is why Ron Klain
00:09:15.300 called it a workaround.
00:09:16.360 Right.
00:09:17.680 To be fair,
00:09:18.780 the healthcare workers,
00:09:19.960 there's a stronger
00:09:20.740 statutory argument there.
00:09:22.100 The statutory language
00:09:22.980 is different
00:09:23.500 and so there is
00:09:24.320 a stronger argument.
00:09:25.460 I still think
00:09:26.140 that mandate
00:09:26.980 should have been
00:09:27.440 struck down as well.
00:09:29.260 But there is
00:09:30.900 a meaningful difference
00:09:32.360 in terms of
00:09:33.440 with OSHA,
00:09:36.220 they had zero legs
00:09:37.100 to stand on
00:09:38.000 with the healthcare workers.
00:09:39.320 They didn't even have
00:09:39.860 a leg,
00:09:40.440 but maybe they had a toe. 0.92
00:09:42.760 Fair enough.
00:09:43.540 Fair enough.
00:09:43.960 And still,
00:09:44.400 still basically a win.
00:09:46.280 Even if it was unfortunate
00:09:48.460 that the court
00:09:49.300 wouldn't go all the way
00:09:50.560 on this second case,
00:09:52.160 still a major win.
00:09:53.320 84 million Americans
00:09:54.280 don't need to be vaccinated
00:09:55.540 against their will.
00:09:56.260 Well,
00:09:56.540 and I got to say,
00:09:57.260 I take particular pride
00:09:58.720 because not only
00:09:59.340 did we predict
00:10:00.820 at every stage
00:10:01.920 what would happen
00:10:02.720 in this case
00:10:03.380 on the podcast,
00:10:04.980 but the lawyer
00:10:05.840 who argued the case
00:10:06.860 was my former chief counsel.
00:10:09.220 So it's a fellow
00:10:09.800 named Scott Keller.
00:10:10.740 He's a great guy.
00:10:12.900 Scott was actually
00:10:14.500 a student of mine.
00:10:15.420 So I met Scott
00:10:16.340 when I was teaching
00:10:17.240 at University of Texas
00:10:18.000 Law School
00:10:18.480 and he was a law student there.
00:10:21.000 I taught a seminar
00:10:21.800 on U.S. Supreme Court litigation
00:10:23.560 and he took the class.
00:10:27.200 He was excellent in the class,
00:10:28.640 did extraordinary.
00:10:29.360 I gave him an A plus
00:10:30.200 and then I didn't give
00:10:31.340 very many A pluses.
00:10:33.180 He graduated number one
00:10:34.960 in his class
00:10:35.580 at University of Texas Law School.
00:10:37.120 He went and clerked
00:10:37.980 on the Court of Appeals.
00:10:39.060 He clerked for Justice Kennedy
00:10:41.160 on the Supreme Court
00:10:42.160 and I recommended him for that.
00:10:45.880 And then when I,
00:10:46.520 several years later,
00:10:47.480 when I was elected
00:10:48.360 to the Senate,
00:10:49.560 I hired Scott
00:10:50.460 as my first chief counsel.
00:10:51.780 So when I showed up
00:10:52.940 a decade ago
00:10:53.880 in the Senate,
00:10:55.480 Scott,
00:10:55.820 we were down in the basement.
00:10:57.000 I'd just gotten here.
00:10:57.740 When you first get here,
00:10:58.580 you don't even have
00:10:58.960 a real office.
00:10:59.700 You're sort of
00:11:00.060 in temporary space
00:11:01.040 and you're just
00:11:01.560 trying to figure out everything.
00:11:03.420 So Scott spent
00:11:04.300 a couple of years with me
00:11:05.880 as my chief counsel
00:11:07.760 and then actually
00:11:08.560 came and quit.
00:11:10.220 And here's why I quit.
00:11:12.140 Because he'd been appointed
00:11:13.440 to be the Solicitor General
00:11:15.500 of Texas.
00:11:16.360 Not a bad gig.
00:11:17.400 And it's my old job.
00:11:18.400 It's a job I loved.
00:11:19.840 I did five and a half years.
00:11:21.240 And when Scott
00:11:22.500 gave his notice,
00:11:23.160 I was really sad.
00:11:24.560 Like I didn't want
00:11:25.140 to lose him
00:11:25.600 because he's
00:11:25.880 a really talented lawyer.
00:11:27.480 But I couldn't complain
00:11:28.880 because SG of Texas
00:11:30.800 is an amazing job.
00:11:34.000 And you get to argue cases.
00:11:35.380 You get to argue cases.
00:11:36.780 So Scott has now
00:11:37.520 argued more cases
00:11:38.320 than I did.
00:11:38.800 I argued nine cases.
00:11:40.640 He,
00:11:41.100 when he argued
00:11:42.180 his 10th case,
00:11:43.040 I called him that morning
00:11:44.140 and said,
00:11:44.480 all right, 1.00
00:11:44.720 screw you. 1.00
00:11:45.740 I just had to say 1.00
00:11:46.780 that as a former boss,
00:11:47.700 I had to like
00:11:48.220 throw that marker down.
00:11:49.160 So now I have to ask you,
00:11:50.200 obviously you're not
00:11:50.760 going to be arguing a case
00:11:52.220 before the Supreme Court
00:11:53.180 right now,
00:11:53.760 but are you bringing
00:11:55.560 this case before
00:11:56.480 the Supreme Court
00:11:57.100 just to beat
00:11:58.300 your old general counsel?
00:12:00.000 Well, no,
00:12:00.860 but there was a separate case.
00:12:02.580 So we're sitting here,
00:12:03.500 we're recording this
00:12:04.180 on Wednesday.
00:12:05.100 This morning,
00:12:06.660 the Supreme Court
00:12:07.720 heard an oral argument.
00:12:08.800 The very first case
00:12:09.940 was Federal Election
00:12:11.180 Commission
00:12:11.700 versus Ted Cruz.
00:12:12.740 and I am the plaintiff.
00:12:15.460 I have sued
00:12:16.100 the Federal Election Commission
00:12:17.280 seeking to strike down
00:12:19.940 a provision
00:12:20.700 of McCain-Feingold,
00:12:21.800 the big campaign
00:12:22.460 finance legislation.
00:12:23.840 It's a terrible piece
00:12:24.580 of legislation.
00:12:26.360 It has all sorts
00:12:27.440 of problems,
00:12:28.300 but at the heart of it,
00:12:30.320 McCain-Feingold
00:12:31.140 was all about
00:12:32.040 incumbent politicians
00:12:33.180 wanting to make it harder
00:12:34.900 for anyone to run
00:12:35.780 against them
00:12:36.320 and challenge them.
00:12:37.140 It was about
00:12:37.640 the one thing
00:12:38.480 Republicans and Democrats
00:12:39.560 could agree on
00:12:40.280 is nobody should beat us
00:12:42.060 in an election.
00:12:42.740 So McCain-Feingold
00:12:43.640 is throwing barriers
00:12:45.020 in the way of challenge.
00:12:45.880 This doesn't make sense,
00:12:46.780 though,
00:12:46.860 because I was reading
00:12:47.700 a lot of left-wing
00:12:48.520 news sources today
00:12:49.420 that were all telling me
00:12:50.880 about the case,
00:12:51.660 and they say that Ted Cruz
00:12:52.940 is bringing a lawsuit
00:12:54.680 before the Supreme Court
00:12:55.660 to make it easier
00:12:57.160 to bribe and corrupt politicians
00:12:59.860 and to make this swamp land
00:13:02.360 even swampier.
00:13:03.900 Are you telling me
00:13:04.580 that the left-wing media
00:13:05.320 got it wrong?
00:13:05.840 You're right.
00:13:06.260 That's every headline
00:13:07.320 is Cruz wants more bribery.
00:13:09.960 And even for the media,
00:13:11.400 that's a little dishonest.
00:13:12.680 So there were two provisions
00:13:14.620 of McCain-Feingold
00:13:16.280 that were called
00:13:16.800 the Millionaire's Amendment.
00:13:18.480 So incumbent politicians
00:13:20.600 hate anyone
00:13:21.720 that can challenge them.
00:13:23.480 They particularly hate
00:13:24.620 people who have money.
00:13:25.600 So if you get
00:13:26.200 a really rich person
00:13:27.020 that runs against you,
00:13:28.000 that's really problematic
00:13:29.140 because then they can run ads
00:13:30.360 and communicate
00:13:30.840 and you've got a problem.
00:13:32.120 So the Millionaire's Amendment,
00:13:33.360 half of it said
00:13:34.360 that if someone self-finances
00:13:36.600 and puts a whole bunch
00:13:37.360 of money into his own campaign,
00:13:38.880 that the federal limits
00:13:41.440 for the other guy
00:13:42.360 are tripled.
00:13:43.720 So instead of $2,900 a person,
00:13:45.720 it's nearly $9,000 a person.
00:13:48.660 And that's entirely designed
00:13:50.720 to benefit incumbents
00:13:52.740 and to discourage rich people
00:13:54.500 from running against them.
00:13:55.860 Well, the Supreme Court
00:13:56.700 a few years ago
00:13:57.460 struck that half
00:13:58.420 of the Millionaire's Amendment down
00:13:59.500 and said,
00:13:59.840 look, if someone decides
00:14:00.800 to run for office,
00:14:01.560 if they want to invest
00:14:02.400 their own resources
00:14:03.200 and speak,
00:14:04.380 you have a right to speech
00:14:05.420 and that means
00:14:06.280 spending your own money
00:14:07.520 to speak,
00:14:08.140 if you want to put
00:14:09.340 a billboard on the freeway,
00:14:10.560 if you want to run
00:14:11.040 a radio ad or a TV ad,
00:14:12.400 all of that is political speech.
00:14:14.280 So that was half
00:14:15.120 of the Millionaire's Amendment
00:14:15.940 that was struck down
00:14:16.620 several years ago.
00:14:18.100 The other half
00:14:19.080 of the Millionaire's Amendment
00:14:19.880 is what this case
00:14:20.640 is all about.
00:14:21.900 And it's a provision
00:14:23.100 that limits the ability
00:14:24.580 of a candidate
00:14:25.240 who's running for office
00:14:26.380 to loan money
00:14:27.720 to his own campaign.
00:14:28.860 So the way it works,
00:14:29.680 let's say Michael Knowles
00:14:31.220 wakes up and says,
00:14:32.080 I'm going to run for Congress.
00:14:33.520 And you'd say,
00:14:34.420 get this man to a psychiatrist
00:14:35.800 who's lost his mind. 0.99
00:14:37.540 But you're incurable.
00:14:38.920 And you say,
00:14:39.640 I'm going to run,
00:14:40.560 I'm taking on AOC,
00:14:42.140 I'm moving to New York.
00:14:43.220 My old district.
00:14:44.160 We're going
00:14:44.800 and I'm going to win.
00:14:45.780 Now, if you're starting,
00:14:48.000 you know,
00:14:48.240 you may not have
00:14:49.620 a lot of supporters.
00:14:50.520 You're not an incumbent politician.
00:14:51.940 You don't have lobbyists
00:14:52.780 probably supporting you.
00:14:53.700 You don't have the infrastructure
00:14:54.940 that an incumbent has.
00:14:56.400 So what a lot of people do
00:14:58.180 if they launch a campaign
00:14:59.400 is they loan themselves
00:15:01.080 some money.
00:15:01.940 So they have some money,
00:15:03.020 some savings,
00:15:03.680 and they put some money
00:15:04.460 in to start the campaign.
00:15:06.400 What McCain-Feingold said
00:15:08.020 is if you loan your,
00:15:09.380 if you loan your own money
00:15:10.700 to your campaign,
00:15:11.980 after the election,
00:15:14.680 you can only pay yourself back
00:15:17.020 up to $250,000 of it.
00:15:19.400 Okay.
00:15:20.460 Anything above $250,000
00:15:22.540 with money that is raised
00:15:24.000 after the campaign,
00:15:25.140 you can't pay back
00:15:26.140 and you're just stuck.
00:15:28.340 And by the way,
00:15:29.220 when you talk,
00:15:30.160 especially about
00:15:30.680 competitive districts,
00:15:32.060 these campaigns
00:15:33.380 can cost millions
00:15:34.380 and millions of dollars.
00:15:35.700 So $250,000
00:15:37.100 is not as much
00:15:38.220 as it sounds like.
00:15:39.160 So, and what this
00:15:40.000 is designed to do
00:15:41.120 is it's designed
00:15:42.700 to disincentive
00:15:43.780 challengers.
00:15:44.820 So, look,
00:15:45.620 if you're a gazillionaire,
00:15:46.580 and by the way,
00:15:46.980 we're seeing more and more
00:15:47.760 billionaires running for office.
00:15:49.220 If you're a billionaire,
00:15:50.500 you don't care.
00:15:51.320 You can put $5, $10,
00:15:52.500 $20 million
00:15:53.000 into your campaign.
00:15:54.040 You don't matter.
00:15:54.440 You're so rich,
00:15:55.000 it doesn't make a difference.
00:15:55.660 You never need it back.
00:15:56.440 So, this is not
00:15:57.440 a disincentive
00:15:58.760 to the super rich.
00:15:59.860 Yeah.
00:16:00.660 And we're actually seeing
00:16:02.300 more and more billionaires
00:16:03.560 who are running for office
00:16:04.580 because they have
00:16:05.340 the massive money.
00:16:06.780 What this is an incentive to
00:16:08.340 is the small business owner.
00:16:09.980 What this is an incentive to
00:16:11.080 is the doctor.
00:16:11.960 This is the somewhat rich.
00:16:13.520 It's not the super rich,
00:16:14.380 it's the somewhat.
00:16:14.940 Who has enough money
00:16:16.080 that you could invest
00:16:17.100 a substantial amount of money.
00:16:18.560 You could invest
00:16:19.380 $500,000.
00:16:20.900 You can invest a million dollars.
00:16:22.120 You've saved.
00:16:22.920 You put your money
00:16:23.780 in the bank.
00:16:24.280 You've saved.
00:16:25.160 And you can invest the money
00:16:26.200 in a congressional race
00:16:27.180 if you could put
00:16:27.760 $500,000 or a million.
00:16:29.300 That gives you a real shot
00:16:30.780 at communicating.
00:16:32.320 This is designed
00:16:33.300 to punish that guy
00:16:34.280 and say,
00:16:34.680 well, you know what?
00:16:35.420 Let's say you worked hard.
00:16:37.640 You're a physician.
00:16:38.780 You've got a million dollars
00:16:39.620 in the bank.
00:16:40.280 You loan it to the campaign.
00:16:41.920 You spent every penny
00:16:43.240 of it on the campaign.
00:16:44.980 You can pay back $250,000
00:16:46.960 and $750,000 of it.
00:16:48.940 Tough luck, Michael.
00:16:49.860 You have given it
00:16:50.800 to the United States of America.
00:16:52.740 You don't get it back.
00:16:53.660 And so that's what
00:16:55.780 the existing law is.
00:16:57.140 And so what I did in 2018
00:16:58.480 is I loaned my campaign
00:17:01.660 $260,000.
00:17:03.740 Now, that's a very specific number,
00:17:05.640 Senator.
00:17:06.100 It is.
00:17:07.000 It's $10,000 more
00:17:08.300 than the limit.
00:17:09.640 So I loaned my campaign
00:17:11.020 $260,000 right before the election
00:17:13.160 and then 20 days after the election.
00:17:15.380 A little bit later than that,
00:17:16.720 I repaid myself $250,000,
00:17:19.060 which is what you're allowed to do.
00:17:20.080 So there's $10,000
00:17:21.180 that under the law,
00:17:23.160 it's illegal for me
00:17:23.940 to pay myself back.
00:17:25.580 And I did that
00:17:26.940 in order to file this lawsuit.
00:17:28.740 Now, as I was just reading it,
00:17:30.580 obviously you can tell it better
00:17:31.960 because you were there.
00:17:33.160 The lawyer for the government
00:17:35.200 is saying that
00:17:36.240 this case should be dismissed.
00:17:37.680 It should be thrown out
00:17:38.360 because you obviously
00:17:39.780 were doing something
00:17:41.100 that you knew was against the law.
00:17:42.280 You were just trying
00:17:42.720 to trigger this court case.
00:17:44.340 Yeah, that was an argument
00:17:45.360 that the Biden Justice Department made.
00:17:47.420 That's a really weak argument.
00:17:49.000 So if you look at,
00:17:50.160 there are lots of cases
00:17:51.280 that are test cases,
00:17:52.700 that if there's an illegal
00:17:53.800 or unconstitutional law,
00:17:55.380 you're allowed to challenge it
00:17:57.580 and you're allowed to violate that law
00:18:01.960 to challenge it.
00:18:02.940 You're allowed to create the facts.
00:18:05.320 And there are literally
00:18:06.820 hundreds of test cases
00:18:08.540 where people,
00:18:10.260 you know,
00:18:11.980 if the government makes it illegal
00:18:15.260 for Michael Knowles
00:18:17.680 to defend the right to life.
00:18:20.340 Yeah.
00:18:20.980 You know, the government said,
00:18:22.240 well, you chose to say it.
00:18:23.540 You chose to violate it.
00:18:24.900 You could have just obeyed.
00:18:26.260 Why didn't you?
00:18:26.880 Yeah.
00:18:27.160 So dismiss the case.
00:18:28.380 Right.
00:18:28.580 Or it's out of here.
00:18:29.160 And so that argument
00:18:30.080 is not going to go anywhere.
00:18:32.120 I'll say the argument,
00:18:33.180 I think, went well.
00:18:33.960 I hope so.
00:18:35.480 The lawyer who argued it
00:18:37.020 is a guy named Chuck Cooper,
00:18:38.360 who is a very close friend of mine.
00:18:40.720 He was my first boss
00:18:41.760 when I came out of my clerkship.
00:18:43.500 And so I clerked
00:18:46.020 for Chief Justice William Rehnquist
00:18:47.320 on the Supreme Court.
00:18:49.180 I came out of the clerkship in 1997
00:18:51.220 and I joined Chuck
00:18:52.620 at what was then
00:18:53.420 a tiny little law firm
00:18:54.740 that was called Cooper and Carvin.
00:18:56.780 And it was Chuck Coopers,
00:18:57.920 Mike Carvin.
00:18:59.140 Law firm had six lawyers in it.
00:19:00.920 It was all of nine months old.
00:19:02.800 And Chuck had been also a clerk for Rehnquist.
00:19:05.660 So he was a former Rehnquist clerk.
00:19:07.540 He's one of the top
00:19:08.540 Supreme Court litigators in the country.
00:19:09.940 And he was my first boss.
00:19:11.120 And so I went to work for him
00:19:13.160 to learn how to be a lawyer.
00:19:14.960 He really taught me
00:19:16.540 how to be a lawyer.
00:19:18.980 And so he's representing me
00:19:20.500 in this case.
00:19:21.000 And he's a dear, dear friend.
00:19:23.560 He did a terrific job.
00:19:25.440 And I will say, look,
00:19:26.700 it's never absolutely clear
00:19:30.980 how a case is going to come out.
00:19:32.220 I think on the merits,
00:19:33.960 there are clearly
00:19:34.760 a majority of justices
00:19:36.140 who agree that this provision
00:19:38.060 is unconstitutional.
00:19:39.600 Okay.
00:19:40.880 The Department of Justice
00:19:42.120 is trying to raise
00:19:43.080 lots of procedural issues
00:19:44.740 that basically are saying,
00:19:46.320 don't get to the merits.
00:19:47.560 Don't address
00:19:48.200 whether the law is constitutional.
00:19:50.420 And so they're throwing
00:19:51.540 a lot of muck in the air
00:19:52.680 trying to say,
00:19:53.460 avoid the actual question
00:19:54.820 of the lawsuit.
00:19:55.440 I hope the court doesn't do that.
00:19:56.660 I hope they actually
00:19:57.480 answer the question.
00:19:59.480 Because this provision
00:20:00.940 really is designed,
00:20:03.720 and by the way,
00:20:04.340 if you look at the proponents of it,
00:20:05.900 if you look at Harry Reid,
00:20:06.880 you look actually
00:20:07.360 Kay Bailey Hutchison,
00:20:08.380 my predecessor in the Senate,
00:20:09.760 they got up and said,
00:20:11.300 this is to make it harder
00:20:12.560 for people to challenge us.
00:20:13.960 This is all about
00:20:15.160 protecting incumbents
00:20:16.860 and protecting the super wealthy,
00:20:19.520 the billionaires,
00:20:20.460 and it's about hurting
00:20:22.220 the small business owner,
00:20:24.740 the doctor,
00:20:25.540 the entrepreneur,
00:20:26.400 the person who wants
00:20:27.240 to run for Congress
00:20:28.100 because they want to be
00:20:28.800 Mr. Smith going to Washington.
00:20:30.580 They want to challenge the swamp.
00:20:32.300 So what's the swamp want to do?
00:20:33.820 Make it a lot harder
00:20:34.720 to challenge the swamp.
00:20:35.580 Now, speaking of incumbent senators
00:20:37.380 who are desperately
00:20:38.320 trying to hold on to power,
00:20:40.240 there has been a major push
00:20:42.280 from the Biden administration
00:20:44.280 and the Democrat senators
00:20:45.520 and Chuck Schumer
00:20:46.180 to get rid of the filibuster.
00:20:49.280 Before they lose their elections,
00:20:50.820 which increasingly,
00:20:51.640 it looks like,
00:20:52.100 is going to happen in November,
00:20:54.080 they are trying to
00:20:55.360 get through any legislation,
00:20:57.140 and they can't do that right now
00:20:58.060 because they don't have enough votes
00:21:01.040 to get through the 60-vote threshold.
00:21:03.540 And I think,
00:21:04.740 you know it more closely than I do,
00:21:07.420 I think that the attempt
00:21:08.820 to kill the filibuster
00:21:09.760 is just as dead as the OSHA mandate.
00:21:12.280 Am I right?
00:21:14.020 Hopefully, yes,
00:21:14.840 and I think you are.
00:21:15.900 Okay.
00:21:16.180 So you and I were recording this
00:21:18.140 Wednesday late afternoon.
00:21:20.280 As soon as we finish recording this,
00:21:22.360 I'm going to get up,
00:21:23.180 literally in a half hour,
00:21:24.320 I'm going to be on the Senate floor,
00:21:25.760 and we're having
00:21:26.420 the filibuster fight tonight.
00:21:28.180 So I have not yet had that battle,
00:21:29.840 but in about half hour, we will.
00:21:32.360 What is going to happen
00:21:33.780 is that Chuck Schumer
00:21:35.960 is going to file cloture
00:21:37.860 on their federal election
00:21:40.200 takeover legislation.
00:21:42.300 Cloture takes 60 votes.
00:21:44.700 It's going to fail.
00:21:46.480 He will probably get all the Democrats.
00:21:48.200 It'll probably be 50-50,
00:21:49.580 but it will fail
00:21:51.140 because 50 is not 60.
00:21:54.120 They then, I think,
00:21:55.380 will yabber a while
00:21:56.340 because they want to make us
00:21:57.440 listen to them yabber.
00:21:58.380 And then what he's going to do
00:22:01.400 likely is file a motion
00:22:03.340 to reconsider,
00:22:05.760 and he will challenge,
00:22:08.080 he will inquire of the chair
00:22:09.780 whether it takes 50 or 60 votes
00:22:13.020 to proceed to cloture.
00:22:15.600 The chair will reject his claim.
00:22:17.820 We'll say it takes 60,
00:22:19.620 assuming the chair follows the law.
00:22:21.220 Right.
00:22:21.480 In which case,
00:22:24.860 Schumer will move to appeal.
00:22:27.440 He will appeal the ruling of the chair.
00:22:29.740 That's what's called the nuclear option.
00:22:31.480 So the rules of the Senate,
00:22:33.480 they're written down.
00:22:34.540 They're in a book.
00:22:34.980 We all have that book in our desks.
00:22:36.500 You have the rules of the Senate.
00:22:37.640 The rules of the Senate say
00:22:38.560 cloture takes 60 votes.
00:22:39.860 That's literally black and white
00:22:41.240 typed in the type of the rules.
00:22:42.860 Now, you can change the rules of the Senate.
00:22:44.760 Right.
00:22:44.980 To change the rules of the Senate
00:22:46.640 takes 67 senators.
00:22:48.340 So it's a higher threshold.
00:22:49.560 67 senators can agree
00:22:50.880 to change the rules of the Senate.
00:22:52.840 They don't have 67 senators.
00:22:55.220 There is one other way to do it,
00:22:56.780 and it's what's called the nuclear option.
00:22:58.980 So Schumer will appeal
00:23:00.440 the ruling of the chair.
00:23:02.760 Any ruling of the chair can be appealed.
00:23:05.780 To overturn the ruling of the chair
00:23:07.920 just takes 50 votes.
00:23:10.120 Takes a majority.
00:23:11.080 Doesn't take 60.
00:23:12.000 And then the Senate is weird.
00:23:13.180 If the ruling of the chair is overturned,
00:23:16.660 that becomes a precedent.
00:23:19.300 And they actually keep a book
00:23:20.200 of all the precedents of the Senate.
00:23:22.320 And that precedent has the same force
00:23:24.920 as the rules written on paper.
00:23:27.060 So in other words,
00:23:28.280 if Schumer succeeds,
00:23:31.240 he will break the rules of the Senate
00:23:33.000 in order to change the rules of the Senate.
00:23:35.780 So now you'll have these two rules
00:23:37.600 written down on the paper,
00:23:38.640 and the new one beats the old one.
00:23:40.280 Right.
00:23:40.580 And the new one is just a precedent.
00:23:41.880 It's just a majority of the Senate
00:23:44.080 voted that this is now the rules,
00:23:45.640 so the old ones written on the paper
00:23:47.060 don't matter anymore.
00:23:47.960 Right.
00:23:48.720 Now, the good news is,
00:23:50.120 I think the odds are extremely likely,
00:23:53.220 hopefully certain,
00:23:55.040 that Schumer's going to fail.
00:23:56.700 And the reason for that
00:24:00.000 is that there are two senators,
00:24:02.380 two Democrats,
00:24:02.920 who have been explicit saying
00:24:04.300 they're not going to participate
00:24:05.300 in nuking the filibuster.
00:24:07.820 Joe Manchin, Kyrsten Sinema.
00:24:09.720 Kyrsten Sinema last week
00:24:10.780 gave a speech on the Senate floor.
00:24:12.180 I was sitting on the floor.
00:24:13.040 I heard her speech
00:24:13.740 where she drew a line and said,
00:24:16.320 I will not do this.
00:24:17.680 This will destroy the Senate.
00:24:18.960 It will destroy bipartisanship.
00:24:20.520 Mind you,
00:24:21.780 one of the illustrations
00:24:22.700 of just how nasty and partisan
00:24:26.140 ending the filibuster
00:24:27.180 would make the Senate,
00:24:28.620 that same week,
00:24:30.560 Joe Biden was down in Georgia
00:24:32.260 giving this racist, 0.97
00:24:36.760 nasty, divisive speech, 0.99
00:24:39.320 partisan speech. 0.92
00:24:40.300 He called half the country
00:24:41.840 Bull Connor racists.
00:24:44.000 He called every Republican in America 0.84
00:24:45.720 a Bull Connor racist.
00:24:47.140 He called Joe Manchin.
00:24:48.220 Literally, by the way.
00:24:48.760 He literally said,
00:24:49.480 you are like Bull Connor.
00:24:50.760 You are like George Wallace.
00:24:52.400 It was hateful.
00:24:53.960 Now, set aside the irony
00:24:55.100 that Bull Connor
00:24:55.800 and George Wallace
00:24:56.780 were Democrats.
00:24:58.280 Set aside the irony
00:24:59.300 that Joe Biden
00:25:00.180 literally gave a eulogy
00:25:01.840 at Robert Byrd's funeral
00:25:03.720 and an exalted Cyclops,
00:25:06.360 the Ku Klux Klan.
00:25:08.260 So if anyone has no standing
00:25:10.820 to be on his high horse
00:25:12.020 on racial grounds,
00:25:13.400 it's Joseph Biden.
00:25:16.340 What?
00:25:17.140 That kind of speech
00:25:18.620 is just,
00:25:21.700 not only do they not want
00:25:23.360 any Republicans,
00:25:24.640 Susan Collins is too conservative
00:25:26.120 for them,
00:25:26.520 Mitt Romney is too conservative
00:25:27.780 for them.
00:25:28.860 Now they don't even want Democrats.
00:25:30.880 Manchin and Sinema,
00:25:32.420 today you've got Bernie Sanders
00:25:34.240 talking about he's going to support
00:25:35.740 primary challengers
00:25:37.000 to Manchin and Sinema.
00:25:39.060 And Chuck Schumer said
00:25:39.960 he didn't know if he would support
00:25:41.200 his own caucus.
00:25:42.900 It is ugly.
00:25:47.080 Assuming Sinema and Manchin
00:25:48.640 don't blink,
00:25:49.340 and I don't think they will
00:25:50.500 at this point.
00:25:51.040 If it was just one of them,
00:25:52.240 the rest,
00:25:52.640 I would be more nervous.
00:25:53.780 Right.
00:25:54.260 With the two of them,
00:25:55.260 I'm hoping each bucks
00:25:56.540 the other up.
00:25:57.300 And just as a matter
00:25:58.180 of practical politics,
00:26:00.460 person-to-person politics,
00:26:01.500 the Democrats seem to be doing
00:26:03.020 everything they can
00:26:04.240 to irritate Manchin and Sinema,
00:26:07.420 chasing them into bathrooms
00:26:09.620 and filming them.
00:26:10.840 Well, I've got to say
00:26:11.460 with Manchin,
00:26:12.280 you know,
00:26:12.480 come on in,
00:26:12.940 the water's warm.
00:26:14.000 As I told Joe
00:26:15.140 several weeks ago,
00:26:16.440 you know,
00:26:16.680 one of the two parties
00:26:17.460 actually likes you.
00:26:18.580 Right, right.
00:26:20.640 Now you want to,
00:26:21.380 so, but,
00:26:23.180 the odds are very,
00:26:24.760 very high
00:26:25.280 that tonight
00:26:26.080 Schumer will fail.
00:26:28.380 To be honest,
00:26:28.960 this is performance theater
00:26:30.180 for Schumer's primary
00:26:31.700 in New York
00:26:32.360 that he doesn't want
00:26:33.240 AOC to primary him.
00:26:34.200 So he's trying to appease
00:26:35.760 the radical left
00:26:36.720 by failing tonight.
00:26:38.220 So he's setting it up
00:26:39.040 to fail tonight.
00:26:39.660 It'll be interesting
00:26:40.260 to see if Kamala Harris
00:26:41.420 is in the seat
00:26:42.120 as a presiding officer.
00:26:43.320 My bet is she will be
00:26:44.440 because, you know,
00:26:45.620 if you're going to have
00:26:46.100 a big failure,
00:26:46.680 you do need Kamala
00:26:47.540 to preside over it.
00:26:48.560 And that's literally-
00:26:49.680 It's just fitting.
00:26:51.420 It's the way they think.
00:26:53.000 Yeah.
00:26:53.140 It is all about 0.96
00:26:54.500 appease the crazy left. 0.76
00:26:57.540 This is going to fail tonight, 0.64
00:26:58.940 but you want to hear
00:26:59.640 something really ironic?
00:27:02.480 Okay,
00:27:02.880 so we were supposed
00:27:03.540 to be on recess this week. 0.97
00:27:05.980 Schumer is a terrible
00:27:06.940 majority leader.
00:27:07.640 He doesn't actually know
00:27:08.220 how to run the Senate,
00:27:09.020 and so he had to, like,
00:27:10.160 cancel the recess
00:27:10.760 and come back
00:27:11.420 to do this performance theater
00:27:13.060 and failed night.
00:27:14.780 I actually,
00:27:15.560 on my flight out here today,
00:27:17.180 Rand Paul was on the flight
00:27:18.780 because he was called back
00:27:19.760 and had to vote on this.
00:27:20.540 And we're all here.
00:27:21.360 Every Republican
00:27:21.920 has to be here.
00:27:24.400 You know,
00:27:24.960 if they could knock
00:27:25.940 one of us off,
00:27:26.600 they could win
00:27:27.020 this filibuster fight.
00:27:27.920 So we're like,
00:27:29.100 you know,
00:27:29.900 you know,
00:27:30.180 we've got tasters right now.
00:27:31.200 Put it over your shoulder.
00:27:32.220 Right.
00:27:34.980 It's,
00:27:35.540 for two weeks,
00:27:38.520 they've given speeches
00:27:40.460 about how the filibuster
00:27:43.120 is a Jim Crow relic 0.95
00:27:46.740 from racist times.
00:27:48.860 The filibuster is evil.
00:27:50.600 Do you know what
00:27:53.100 the very last thing
00:27:55.240 the Democrats did was
00:27:56.940 for today?
00:27:58.380 No,
00:28:00.320 no,
00:28:00.660 I have no idea,
00:28:02.260 Senator.
00:28:02.560 Let me,
00:28:03.060 the last thing
00:28:03.880 the Democrats did
00:28:04.840 last week
00:28:06.820 was filibuster
00:28:09.340 my bill
00:28:11.360 sanctioning Russia,
00:28:14.000 sanctioning Nord Stream 2.
00:28:15.380 Now,
00:28:15.480 we've talked a lot
00:28:16.100 about Nord Stream 2.
00:28:17.000 You know,
00:28:17.340 if they didn't have
00:28:18.480 double standards,
00:28:19.540 they would have
00:28:20.460 no standards at all.
00:28:23.300 Literally,
00:28:24.140 as they're giving speeches,
00:28:25.620 the filibuster is racist.
00:28:26.940 Let's filibuster this.
00:28:27.780 Like,
00:28:28.220 simultaneously.
00:28:30.840 And I gotta say,
00:28:31.920 it was amazing.
00:28:32.560 So this vote,
00:28:33.640 the vote we had last week
00:28:34.780 was a big,
00:28:35.600 big deal on Nord Stream 2.
00:28:36.900 So this is
00:28:37.520 about this pipeline,
00:28:39.500 and it's really about
00:28:40.220 the future of Ukraine
00:28:41.400 vis-a-vis Russia
00:28:42.480 and vis-a-vis the West.
00:28:43.480 Yeah,
00:28:43.680 so the history of it,
00:28:45.340 we've talked a lot
00:28:46.220 about Ukraine
00:28:46.960 on this show.
00:28:48.940 We started off
00:28:49.780 two years ago
00:28:50.780 with impeachment
00:28:52.460 and Ukraine
00:28:53.180 and Burisma,
00:28:53.920 and we talked about
00:28:54.460 how Ukraine
00:28:55.040 used to be part
00:28:55.680 of the Soviet Union.
00:28:56.460 And when the Soviet Union
00:28:58.200 collapsed,
00:28:58.740 Ukraine became
00:28:59.380 an independent nation.
00:29:01.120 Ukrainians don't like 1.00
00:29:02.020 the Russians. 0.94
00:29:02.600 The Russians want 1.00
00:29:03.300 to control and dominate
00:29:04.420 Ukraine
00:29:05.020 and many of their neighbors,
00:29:06.460 most of their neighbors.
00:29:07.980 And Putin,
00:29:09.240 look, 0.99
00:29:09.480 Putin is a KGB thug. 0.96
00:29:11.520 He has said 0.96
00:29:12.540 one of the most candid
00:29:13.500 things he's ever said
00:29:14.560 is he's said
00:29:16.000 that he thinks
00:29:16.480 the greatest
00:29:17.020 geopolitical disaster
00:29:18.360 of the 20th century
00:29:19.500 was the dissolution
00:29:21.000 of the Soviet Union.
00:29:21.840 And so Putin
00:29:23.600 longs
00:29:25.120 to reassemble
00:29:26.340 the Soviet Union
00:29:27.180 and have Russia.
00:29:28.400 He wants Soviet 1.00
00:29:29.440 greatness again.
00:29:30.820 And if you're
00:29:31.780 reassembling
00:29:32.320 the Soviet Union,
00:29:33.160 there's nothing
00:29:33.600 you want more
00:29:34.220 than Ukraine.
00:29:34.940 Ukraine is
00:29:35.520 the breadbasket.
00:29:37.940 Now,
00:29:39.140 Putin has invaded
00:29:40.180 Ukraine before.
00:29:41.200 He did it in 2014.
00:29:42.540 Remember Crimea?
00:29:43.400 That's part of Ukraine.
00:29:45.260 Putin marched in
00:29:46.120 and invaded it
00:29:46.760 and took it over.
00:29:47.620 And kept it.
00:29:48.360 And kept it.
00:29:48.940 But he stopped.
00:29:51.580 He didn't continue
00:29:52.820 invading Ukraine.
00:29:53.740 He stopped short.
00:29:55.140 Why did he stop short?
00:29:56.940 Well,
00:29:57.240 the reason is
00:29:58.240 that right now
00:30:00.440 Russia's major export 1.00
00:30:02.020 is natural gas and oil.
00:30:03.520 That's,
00:30:03.640 that's,
00:30:04.500 Putin is basically 0.98
00:30:05.360 a petro tyrant. 0.97
00:30:07.700 And to get
00:30:08.740 his natural gas
00:30:09.760 to Europe,
00:30:10.500 who's the major
00:30:11.120 consumer of it,
00:30:12.520 it goes through
00:30:13.220 pipelines that go
00:30:14.140 right through Ukraine.
00:30:15.380 So Putin's sitting there
00:30:16.680 going,
00:30:16.960 well,
00:30:17.020 if I march into Ukraine,
00:30:18.300 they could damage
00:30:20.700 or destroy those pipelines.
00:30:22.060 And if they damage
00:30:22.760 or destroy those pipelines,
00:30:24.440 suddenly Russia 0.86
00:30:25.500 can't get the gas
00:30:26.560 to Europe 0.88
00:30:27.080 and we're screwed. 0.99
00:30:28.760 So Putin was mad 0.99
00:30:29.880 because he's like,
00:30:30.600 I want to invade them,
00:30:32.040 but they've got
00:30:32.480 a stranglehold
00:30:33.300 on our ability
00:30:33.840 to get gas to Europe.
00:30:35.120 So suddenly,
00:30:36.440 I can't invade them.
00:30:38.500 So what did he do?
00:30:39.480 The next year,
00:30:41.240 Putin launched
00:30:41.940 a project
00:30:42.440 called Nord Stream 2.
00:30:43.720 And it was,
00:30:44.360 let's build
00:30:44.660 an undersea pipeline
00:30:45.760 that skips Ukraine 0.99
00:30:47.580 all together
00:30:48.140 goes under the ocean
00:30:49.120 and goes straight
00:30:49.760 from Russia to Germany.
00:30:51.340 And that pipeline,
00:30:52.600 once it's complete,
00:30:53.420 we don't have to worry
00:30:54.000 about Ukraine
00:30:54.580 and the energy infrastructure.
00:30:55.580 We can march in
00:30:56.220 and take it over
00:30:56.880 because we can get
00:30:57.720 our gas to Europe.
00:30:59.240 Well,
00:30:59.620 two years ago,
00:31:00.340 I introduced bipartisan
00:31:01.260 legislation to stop it.
00:31:04.040 Passed it through Congress,
00:31:05.320 Trump signed it into law,
00:31:06.300 and we stopped the pipeline.
00:31:07.220 We won.
00:31:08.220 The pipeline was dead,
00:31:09.840 buried,
00:31:10.400 stopped,
00:31:10.980 kaput 0.81
00:31:11.360 for over a year.
00:31:12.960 Then Joe Biden
00:31:14.600 came into office
00:31:15.380 and Biden surrendered.
00:31:18.760 He capitulated
00:31:19.580 to Putin.
00:31:21.080 Putin began
00:31:22.080 rebuilding the pipeline
00:31:23.280 literally on January 24th,
00:31:26.500 2021.
00:31:27.220 I'm glad he took
00:31:27.760 a nice long weekend,
00:31:28.920 you know,
00:31:29.120 a few days
00:31:29.820 and then starts up again.
00:31:30.940 Four days after
00:31:31.540 Biden's sworn in.
00:31:33.080 So the pipeline
00:31:34.280 right now
00:31:35.020 is completed,
00:31:37.300 so Putin has finished it
00:31:38.360 because Biden
00:31:39.000 formally waived
00:31:39.900 the sanctions.
00:31:40.400 But it's still awaiting
00:31:43.220 certification in Europe,
00:31:44.400 so they can't turn it on
00:31:45.460 until the regulatory agents
00:31:46.540 have certified it yet.
00:31:49.680 And so I introduced
00:31:51.040 legislation
00:31:51.620 to reimpose
00:31:52.480 the sanctions,
00:31:53.120 to overturn
00:31:53.860 Biden's surrender
00:31:55.420 to Putin.
00:31:57.420 Now,
00:31:58.360 twice I've introduced
00:31:59.300 legislation like this before,
00:32:01.280 and twice it's passed
00:32:02.800 essentially unanimously.
00:32:04.440 Every Democrat
00:32:05.520 has supported it twice.
00:32:08.120 We had a big battle
00:32:09.200 in December.
00:32:09.740 I was holding
00:32:10.900 dozens of State Department
00:32:12.880 nominees.
00:32:13.840 We're there till
00:32:14.640 one in the morning.
00:32:15.440 I'm negotiating
00:32:16.000 with Chuck Schumer.
00:32:16.760 I said,
00:32:17.060 all right,
00:32:17.220 I'm going to lift
00:32:17.820 32 holes,
00:32:19.760 let these nominees
00:32:20.460 go through
00:32:21.040 in exchange
00:32:22.640 for scheduling
00:32:23.320 the vote on Nord Stream 2
00:32:24.340 that we had
00:32:24.680 just last week.
00:32:26.120 Schumer gave in,
00:32:26.880 scheduled the vote.
00:32:27.440 They did not want that vote.
00:32:28.760 The Biden White House
00:32:29.780 was lobbying against it
00:32:30.920 like crazy.
00:32:31.740 Because even if
00:32:32.980 the Democrats
00:32:33.580 win the vote,
00:32:34.740 then they're all
00:32:35.460 on the record
00:32:36.000 of saying,
00:32:36.500 Ukraine,
00:32:37.140 see you later.
00:32:37.780 That's exactly right.
00:32:38.900 And they,
00:32:40.000 for two years,
00:32:41.860 had been squarely
00:32:44.620 against Nord Stream 2.
00:32:46.720 This is a vote
00:32:47.540 when Trump was president,
00:32:50.580 every Democrat
00:32:51.100 was for these sanctions.
00:32:52.460 The only thing,
00:32:53.020 there's two things
00:32:53.600 that are different.
00:32:54.640 Number one,
00:32:55.660 instead of a Republican
00:32:56.700 with an R behind his name,
00:32:58.100 a president
00:32:58.780 with an R behind his name,
00:33:00.100 there's a president
00:33:00.880 with a D behind his name.
00:33:01.940 Now that it's a Democrat,
00:33:03.840 suddenly the Democrats
00:33:04.660 support Russia.
00:33:05.460 And number two,
00:33:07.200 there are over
00:33:07.640 100,000 troops
00:33:08.660 on the border of Ukraine.
00:33:10.780 Any day now,
00:33:12.080 we could see
00:33:12.700 the Ukrainian invasion
00:33:13.920 by Russia.
00:33:16.140 And they have to do it
00:33:17.640 in about the next month
00:33:18.660 or so,
00:33:19.240 because as we get
00:33:20.600 into the spring,
00:33:21.520 the land starts to thaw
00:33:22.980 and the Russian tanks
00:33:24.260 get stuck in the mud.
00:33:25.380 So their window
00:33:26.400 to invade
00:33:27.220 is narrow.
00:33:28.480 But we voted on it.
00:33:31.960 It was amazing.
00:33:32.800 We ended up,
00:33:34.060 so I won the vote,
00:33:36.260 won a substantial
00:33:37.800 bipartisan majority
00:33:39.180 of the Senate.
00:33:39.920 The vote was 55
00:33:41.180 to 44.
00:33:43.520 So every Republican
00:33:45.320 voted yes
00:33:46.040 except Rand Paul,
00:33:46.940 and Rand Paul
00:33:47.380 pretty much opposes
00:33:48.180 all sanctions.
00:33:49.020 So I got all Republicans
00:33:50.260 but Rand.
00:33:51.720 And on the Democratic side,
00:33:54.260 six Democrats voted with me.
00:33:55.960 So it was 55 to 44.
00:33:59.600 It was a big
00:34:00.180 bipartisan majority.
00:34:01.180 We're not living
00:34:01.700 in a particularly
00:34:02.320 bipartisan era,
00:34:03.760 so that's impressive.
00:34:05.340 Now,
00:34:06.320 55
00:34:06.820 is not 60.
00:34:09.200 And so the Democrats
00:34:10.540 filibustered and said,
00:34:11.440 you don't have 60,
00:34:12.100 you don't get to pass it.
00:34:13.680 Now,
00:34:14.540 here's another
00:34:15.340 interesting thing.
00:34:17.460 There are a number
00:34:18.280 of Democrats
00:34:18.820 who are in vulnerable elections
00:34:20.280 who are on the ballot
00:34:21.800 in November.
00:34:23.420 Every single Democrat
00:34:25.000 in a vulnerable election
00:34:26.980 in November
00:34:27.560 voted with me.
00:34:30.200 So,
00:34:31.160 Mark Kelly in Arizona
00:34:32.340 voted for my sanctions
00:34:34.000 on Russia.
00:34:35.300 Catherine Cortez Masto
00:34:36.420 in Nevada
00:34:36.900 voted for my sanctions
00:34:38.240 in Nevada,
00:34:39.060 on Russia.
00:34:40.700 Maggie Hassan
00:34:41.700 in New Hampshire
00:34:42.780 voted for my sanctions
00:34:43.960 against Russia.
00:34:45.440 Even Raphael Warnock,
00:34:46.760 one of the most liberal
00:34:47.580 senators in the Senate,
00:34:49.780 voted for my sanctions
00:34:50.760 against Russia
00:34:51.800 because he didn't want
00:34:53.760 to tell the voters
00:34:54.540 of Georgia in November,
00:34:56.200 yeah,
00:34:56.400 I voted to support Putin
00:34:57.680 because I'm a Democrat.
00:34:58.920 Right.
00:35:01.380 We got six Democrats.
00:35:02.800 You know who we didn't get?
00:35:04.780 Manchin or Sinema.
00:35:06.040 Huh.
00:35:07.640 They're doing enough.
00:35:08.560 So,
00:35:09.300 what was amazing,
00:35:11.800 the day of the vote,
00:35:14.000 Biden came to the Capitol.
00:35:16.320 He had lunch
00:35:17.260 with all the Democratic senators
00:35:19.460 the day of the vote
00:35:20.480 and Joe Biden
00:35:22.100 was personally
00:35:23.280 lobbying
00:35:23.980 the Democratic senators
00:35:25.180 to vote against
00:35:26.320 Cruz's sanctions
00:35:27.200 on Russia.
00:35:27.760 Wow.
00:35:28.580 And so,
00:35:29.300 it's actually,
00:35:29.960 I mean,
00:35:30.120 you said it tongue-in-cheek,
00:35:31.180 but it's actually true.
00:35:31.940 I just think Manchin
00:35:32.700 and Sinema felt
00:35:33.320 they couldn't
00:35:34.480 stand up to the White House
00:35:36.060 and anything else.
00:35:36.640 They were getting so pounded
00:35:37.920 on everything else. 1.00
00:35:38.660 We've killed your
00:35:39.280 legislative agenda,
00:35:40.520 so we'll let you
00:35:41.780 And look,
00:35:42.480 I didn't like that
00:35:43.260 they voted no,
00:35:44.040 but I'll give them
00:35:45.280 a mulligan
00:35:45.800 because they are
00:35:47.200 saving the republic
00:35:48.060 on other sides.
00:35:49.040 Yeah.
00:35:49.660 But the Democrats
00:35:50.700 are literally,
00:35:52.340 literally,
00:35:53.180 this is not hyperbole,
00:35:54.420 they are literally
00:35:55.280 acquiescing
00:35:56.260 in Russia
00:35:58.060 wiping Ukraine 0.74
00:35:59.280 off the map.
00:35:59.800 So they're,
00:36:00.400 you might say
00:36:01.100 they are thumbing
00:36:02.020 their nose
00:36:02.580 at Ukraine,
00:36:04.620 which raises one,
00:36:05.720 I know we have
00:36:06.420 to let you get
00:36:06.980 to the Senate
00:36:07.460 to go vote,
00:36:08.360 but it does raise
00:36:09.140 one very important story
00:36:10.400 that involves
00:36:11.740 a victory and a loss.
00:36:13.800 You won a basketball game,
00:36:15.920 you lost the use
00:36:17.640 of your thumb.
00:36:19.920 True enough,
00:36:20.880 and by the way,
00:36:21.560 that's quite the segue.
00:36:23.700 Let me just say,
00:36:26.080 if the president of Yale
00:36:28.140 ever sees that segue,
00:36:30.240 they will revoke your degree.
00:36:31.500 They've been trying for years.
00:36:32.660 Well, that's true.
00:36:35.280 They would revoke your degree
00:36:36.440 for many other reasons
00:36:37.400 before then,
00:36:38.080 so that's probably
00:36:38.900 the least of your sins
00:36:40.500 on that front.
00:36:41.520 So yeah,
00:36:41.860 so I broke my thumb.
00:36:43.580 You don't have a cast on.
00:36:44.760 So I don't,
00:36:45.360 I've got a splint,
00:36:46.060 but you can take it off.
00:36:46.960 Okay.
00:36:47.320 So I was playing Friday,
00:36:50.300 I play basketball
00:36:51.240 about twice a week,
00:36:52.060 and so Friday,
00:36:54.140 because Schumer
00:36:54.980 doesn't know how
00:36:55.840 to run the Senate,
00:36:56.600 we were still around,
00:36:57.620 and so I was playing
00:36:58.220 Friday morning,
00:36:59.220 and I play,
00:37:01.180 a lot of times
00:37:01.740 other senators play,
00:37:02.960 but I play every week
00:37:04.620 with my staff.
00:37:05.360 We've got some good,
00:37:05.880 good ball players.
00:37:06.640 We've got a couple of guys
00:37:08.120 who played college basketball,
00:37:09.420 a couple of guys
00:37:09.860 who played college football,
00:37:11.140 so we're playing.
00:37:12.040 You actually have invited me
00:37:13.860 to this game.
00:37:14.740 I did make sure
00:37:15.800 I was busy that day
00:37:16.840 so that I did not
00:37:17.720 humiliate myself on the court.
00:37:19.180 So I have joked
00:37:20.500 that our game
00:37:21.620 is more violent
00:37:22.740 than skillful,
00:37:24.060 and it is.
00:37:24.940 I mean,
00:37:25.100 we play no blood,
00:37:25.980 no foul,
00:37:26.820 and there are regularly fouls,
00:37:28.280 so there is regularly blood,
00:37:29.900 and so in this instance,
00:37:32.100 I was going up
00:37:33.200 for a rebound,
00:37:34.260 and the culprit
00:37:35.360 is a guy
00:37:36.940 who was a law clerk
00:37:37.520 in our office.
00:37:38.520 You'll appreciate this
00:37:39.740 as a New Yorker.
00:37:40.460 His name is Tony.
00:37:41.820 He's from New York.
00:37:43.060 I imagine.
00:37:44.380 He is a great guy,
00:37:46.660 hardworking,
00:37:48.560 conservative law student,
00:37:50.440 but he's from Brooklyn,
00:37:52.680 and he played
00:37:54.180 street ball in Brooklyn,
00:37:55.980 and he,
00:37:56.320 Tony from Brooklyn,
00:37:57.260 in every respect,
00:37:59.380 so I went up
00:38:00.100 for a rebound,
00:38:00.960 and he came down
00:38:02.240 like a ton of bricks
00:38:04.060 on my thumb
00:38:05.560 and broke it
00:38:06.560 right across there,
00:38:07.600 so I had an x-ray today,
00:38:09.660 and they're like,
00:38:10.060 actually,
00:38:10.380 yesterday I had an x-ray,
00:38:11.280 they're like,
00:38:11.600 yep,
00:38:11.940 that's a fracture.
00:38:13.560 So you lost
00:38:15.460 a little bit
00:38:15.920 of the use of your thumb,
00:38:16.820 but you did win the game.
00:38:19.240 I did,
00:38:20.040 and we actually
00:38:20.820 finished the game,
00:38:22.560 terrifyingly enough,
00:38:25.040 with the broken thumb.
00:38:26.380 I tried to shoot,
00:38:27.820 and I couldn't,
00:38:28.280 I mean,
00:38:28.600 it really hurt to shoot.
00:38:30.100 This is not quite
00:38:31.000 at the level
00:38:31.480 of Teddy Roosevelt
00:38:32.340 getting shot
00:38:33.100 and finishing his speech,
00:38:34.440 but same principle.
00:38:35.560 But I will say this,
00:38:36.680 I did score a layup
00:38:37.700 with a broken thumb
00:38:38.400 because I could use
00:38:39.020 my four fingers,
00:38:39.780 I just stuck my thumb
00:38:40.580 off to the side
00:38:41.320 and did a little scoop layup,
00:38:42.840 so I even scored
00:38:44.760 a bucket
00:38:45.680 with a broken thumb.
00:38:46.360 It's a physical lesson,
00:38:47.420 it's a political lesson,
00:38:48.320 no pain,
00:38:49.280 no gain,
00:38:50.020 sometimes you have to make
00:38:50.720 some sacrifices
00:38:51.580 for the wins.
00:38:52.580 I hope you get a win
00:38:53.320 tonight.
00:38:54.760 Before we go,
00:38:56.220 you might remember
00:38:57.020 on the 100th episode
00:38:58.660 of Verdict
00:38:59.240 that we announced
00:39:01.280 a contest,
00:39:02.520 actually a series
00:39:03.420 of contests,
00:39:04.680 free merch
00:39:05.640 for people
00:39:06.300 who commented,
00:39:07.220 an opportunity maybe
00:39:08.220 to come out
00:39:08.860 and see some other
00:39:10.360 wonderful prizes as well.
00:39:12.120 Well, now,
00:39:12.500 because this is the
00:39:13.140 two-year anniversary
00:39:14.360 of Verdict with Ted Cruz,
00:39:16.180 we have the winners
00:39:17.880 because we all want
00:39:18.800 to celebrate.
00:39:19.240 Here to introduce
00:39:20.720 those winners,
00:39:22.120 our very own Liz Wheeler.
00:39:23.400 Thank you for having me.
00:39:24.320 I don't like to think
00:39:24.940 of this as giving away
00:39:25.700 free stuff, though.
00:39:26.320 This is earned merchandise.
00:39:28.060 Yes.
00:39:29.360 Our community here
00:39:30.480 earned this
00:39:31.720 by being part of what we do.
00:39:32.900 No handouts.
00:39:33.920 Oh, yeah,
00:39:34.280 we hit these benchmarks,
00:39:35.260 by the way,
00:39:36.000 most of them,
00:39:36.900 and we're going to do
00:39:37.400 the fun stuff anyway.
00:39:38.120 We hit these benchmarks,
00:39:38.940 which is awesome.
00:39:39.860 On YouTube,
00:39:40.560 we said 10 people
00:39:42.180 commenting on episode 100
00:39:43.300 would get a free box
00:39:44.220 of merch,
00:39:44.660 you know,
00:39:44.820 the sweet cactus hat,
00:39:46.240 the laptop stickers,
00:39:47.560 the t-shirts.
00:39:48.040 1,500 people commented.
00:39:49.760 Wow.
00:39:50.480 That's pretty good.
00:39:50.760 That's pretty good, right?
00:39:51.460 Yeah.
00:39:51.980 I think that's incredible.
00:39:52.880 So here are the winners.
00:39:53.940 Ken Melber Jr.,
00:39:55.020 you won.
00:39:56.180 Metaveria,
00:39:56.780 you won.
00:39:57.340 Stefan Diaz,
00:39:58.080 you won.
00:39:58.580 Shelley Carter,
00:39:59.260 you won.
00:39:59.660 Philip Paxton,
00:40:00.760 Driving Fritz,
00:40:01.860 I assume that's
00:40:02.320 a username, right?
00:40:03.480 Thomas Lusty,
00:40:04.480 Dr. Rigg,
00:40:05.280 Mark Erdman,
00:40:06.360 Safe Spot,
00:40:07.220 Andrew Clark,
00:40:08.360 Megadeth Till Death,
00:40:09.940 another username.
00:40:11.100 Still counts.
00:40:11.840 Todd Cole,
00:40:12.740 Mary Fleshman,
00:40:13.520 and Cosmic Carosella.
00:40:15.620 These are the winners.
00:40:16.160 By the way,
00:40:17.020 some parents actually
00:40:18.100 named their child
00:40:19.000 Little Megadeth.
00:40:20.220 Yeah.
00:40:20.800 He or she may be
00:40:21.540 very upset right now.
00:40:22.440 I think that's Slavic.
00:40:23.900 I don't know.
00:40:24.140 Thank you.
00:40:24.900 So we will reach out
00:40:25.920 to each and every one of you
00:40:27.000 to give you your merch here.
00:40:29.580 And I want to see pictures.
00:40:30.740 I want to see pictures
00:40:31.320 of everybody wearing this merch.
00:40:32.840 So that's on YouTube.
00:40:33.940 Then on Verdict Plus,
00:40:36.200 this is maybe
00:40:36.920 the most fun one.
00:40:37.760 We said that
00:40:38.700 a member of Verdict Plus,
00:40:40.140 the Verdict Plus community,
00:40:41.160 will win an all-access trip
00:40:43.040 to come and see us
00:40:43.860 on the road
00:40:44.420 on college campuses.
00:40:45.540 Well, we have a winner here.
00:40:46.600 This is an Italian name.
00:40:47.720 Michael, you can tell me
00:40:48.220 if I'm butchering this.
00:40:49.460 Puzoli.
00:40:50.460 Let me see.
00:40:53.060 I would say,
00:40:54.540 your pronunciation was beautiful.
00:40:56.220 He's going to tell me
00:40:56.700 I'm wrong.
00:40:56.960 I would say
00:40:57.680 you need a little more,
00:40:59.000 you know,
00:40:59.280 you get the face down.
00:41:01.320 Puzoli.
00:41:02.040 Puzoli?
00:41:02.620 Puzoli.
00:41:03.040 Signor Puzoli.
00:41:04.680 Well, Mr. Puzoli,
00:41:06.320 you have won a trip
00:41:07.340 to see Verdict live.
00:41:08.720 That's pretty awesome.
00:41:09.320 We will reach out to you.
00:41:10.060 And then,
00:41:10.800 this is my favorite one,
00:41:11.900 and I am going to bias this poll.
00:41:13.540 We are going to post this
00:41:15.100 on the Verdict Plus community.
00:41:17.000 That's verdictwithtedcruz.com
00:41:18.560 slash plus
00:41:19.320 because everyone needs
00:41:20.420 to vote in this.
00:41:21.620 For this upcoming year,
00:41:23.720 there's going to be
00:41:24.500 a community-based competition
00:41:27.680 or shenanigans,
00:41:28.960 if you will.
00:41:29.480 And this is what
00:41:29.900 you're going to vote on.
00:41:30.660 I'm not taking part in this.
00:41:31.620 I'm just going to enjoy it.
00:41:32.540 You guys will have to do this.
00:41:33.960 Should, for an episode of Verdict,
00:41:35.320 the senator wear a Braves jersey?
00:41:37.440 It's option number one.
00:41:38.320 Option number two,
00:41:38.860 should there be
00:41:39.180 an arm wrestling match
00:41:40.180 between Michael and the senator?
00:41:42.760 I think we all know
00:41:43.240 how that would end.
00:41:45.160 Should the real truth cactus
00:41:46.800 be a special guest on the show?
00:41:48.640 I think that's a good option.
00:41:49.860 Or should there be
00:41:50.440 a throwdown episode
00:41:51.440 trash-talking
00:41:52.300 Yale versus Princeton? 0.98
00:41:54.240 That could go on for hours.
00:41:55.880 That could go on for hours.
00:41:57.040 So this poll will be posted
00:41:58.100 on, again,
00:41:58.820 verdictwithtedcruz.com
00:41:59.900 slash plus.
00:42:01.200 Can I tell you
00:42:01.820 which one I want to see?
00:42:02.920 Which one?
00:42:03.320 Well, I'm going to vote
00:42:03.960 for the arm wrestling.
00:42:04.680 You're going to vote
00:42:05.160 for the arm wrestling.
00:42:05.580 And who do you think
00:42:06.200 is going to win?
00:42:06.580 Michael, don't ask questions
00:42:08.660 you don't want to know
00:42:09.180 the answer to.
00:42:09.680 I'm really polite.
00:42:10.540 Thank you.
00:42:10.820 You can vote in it.
00:42:11.960 Now look,
00:42:12.580 Michael may now be engaged
00:42:13.640 now that I have a broken thumb.
00:42:15.100 He may suddenly feel
00:42:17.220 he's seized an advantage.
00:42:19.680 Providence has smiled upon me.
00:42:21.920 Thank you very much.
00:42:22.920 Well, congratulations
00:42:23.440 to all of the winners.
00:42:24.800 Thank you to everyone
00:42:25.540 who has tuned in
00:42:26.220 for two years.
00:42:27.900 Two years of verdict.
00:42:30.100 It's wonderful.
00:42:30.660 We look forward
00:42:31.180 to a whole lot more episodes
00:42:32.600 with you.
00:42:33.600 And we look forward
00:42:34.340 to arm wrestling.
00:42:35.880 I'm Michael Knowles.
00:42:37.160 This is Verdict
00:42:37.740 with Ted Cruz.
00:42:46.860 This episode of Verdict
00:42:48.420 with Ted Cruz
00:42:49.260 is being brought to you
00:42:50.360 by Jobs, Freedom
00:42:51.380 and Security Pack,
00:42:52.540 a political action committee
00:42:54.100 dedicated to supporting
00:42:55.280 conservative causes,
00:42:56.700 organizations,
00:42:57.660 and candidates
00:42:58.240 across the country.
00:42:59.640 In 2022,
00:43:00.840 Jobs, Freedom
00:43:01.460 and Security Pack
00:43:02.460 plans to donate
00:43:03.320 to conservative candidates
00:43:04.640 running for Congress
00:43:05.680 and help the Republican Party
00:43:07.340 across the nation.
00:43:09.880 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:43:12.140 Guaranteed Human.