00:12:14.840ABC, CBS, NBC, the corporate media, that email doesn't exist.
00:12:20.160Now, as far as the corporate media is concerned, one of the things that you mentioned a minute ago that I want to stop and drill down on a little bit.
00:12:27.960You said early on, the Biden family business, they would just get wires from overseas that were payments through these shell companies.
00:12:37.820But then there came a time when the IRS started coming after them, when they changed how they did business.
00:12:44.300And they began, instead of getting wires that were straight out payments, they began calling them loans.
00:12:49.820Explain that a little bit more about when they did that and why they would have done that.
00:12:54.500But that change started happening somewhere mid-2018.
00:13:00.340And from 2014 to 2018, they were pretty consistent.
00:13:04.600They would, you know, after Joe Biden would meet with these people or Hunter would fly on Air Force 2 or Joe would talk to them on the phone or have lunch with them,
00:13:12.800then money would flow through the shell companies.
00:13:17.480And then they would disperse the money through the shell companies to 10 different Biden family members.
00:13:23.100Once 2018 rolled in and they realized the IRS was rolling in on them and they knew this because the IRS was talking to them and the IRS puts the blower notes to confirm this,
00:13:33.580they changed the way they were doing business.
00:13:35.760Then they started taking money in, some of it directly through their personal accounts, some of it still through shell companies.
00:13:43.720And the reason you do this is twofold.
00:13:45.580Number one, you don't report a loan on your taxes.
00:13:48.740So, theoretically, if you got a $5 million wire from China and you said it was a loan, you didn't have to put that on your taxes and the IRS would never know about it.
00:13:59.180And secondly, and this is the most obvious, you don't have to pay taxes on it then if it's a loan.
00:14:06.360And that's why I always said we're going to follow the bank records.
00:14:09.980We're going to go with the bank statements in lieu of the tax returns because there's nowhere on your tax return does it show you have a loan.
00:14:18.020There's a place on your tax return to show where you pay loan interest, mortgage interest, or if you loan someone money, you receive interest.
00:14:26.260But there's nowhere on your tax returns would it say a loan.
00:14:29.180So if you just got the Biden's tax returns, you would never know about $14 million that we found because they didn't report it to the IRS.
00:14:45.700And look, just to underscore what you said because it's important, by calling it a loan, number one, you don't have to report it to the IRS.
00:14:53.580Number two, you don't have to pay taxes to the IRS.
00:14:57.180But, of course, it's got to be a real loan.
00:15:42.080They won't produce loan documentation.
00:15:44.260It doesn't appear they had anywhere near $14 million in assets.
00:15:48.180So, if you get $14 million in loans, you really need to have about $18 or $19 million in assets because that's the way that the banking rules are.
00:15:57.560You've got to have more than enough or you would be underwater.
00:17:49.760Look, if the intent is to defraud the IRS, if it is a fraudulent vehicle, the IRS can bring it for tax fraud.
00:17:55.700You can't characterize something as a loan that is not, in fact, a loan that doesn't intend to be paid back.
00:18:01.680And, I mean, that, on the face of it, I've got to tell you, I'd be ready to prosecute right now.
00:18:07.220Of course, you know, I don't work at the Biden Justice Department.
00:18:09.720And so my marching orders aren't protect the big guy.
00:18:12.780And the statute of limitations is not far from running on these two.
00:18:17.900They've already let the statute of limitations run on what Hunter did with China back in 17, and the clock is ticking now.
00:18:25.740Now, we started with you telling us your investigators are going to talk with AmeriCorps Health Company about the $600,000 that was paid to Jim Biden.
00:18:35.560And you said $200,000 went straight to Joe Biden.
00:18:39.040Now, did that come from AmeriCorps, or did that come from AmeriCorps to Jim and then Jim to Joe?
00:21:12.960And they had accumulated all this evidence.
00:21:18.460Now they wanted to go in and and raid a storage unit.
00:21:22.820They were told that there were documentation.
00:21:25.320You know, there were documents in a storage unit.
00:21:27.020And they said they also wanted to talk to Joe Biden.
00:21:32.040Well, that was the worst thing they ever said, because when they mentioned Joe Biden, that's when they were told to stand out and they were taken off the case.
00:21:40.460We know from talking to people and Jim Jordan talking to people at the Department of Justice that there were different jurisdictions looking into different things the Bidens had.
00:21:51.140Because when you get a suspicious activity report, the law is the Treasury notifies the the appropriate investigators, you know, whether it be the IRS or whether it be the Department of Justice.
00:22:03.420So they had to be get notification of all this stuff going on.
00:22:09.200We know from the from the FBI sources that Charles Grassley found that they got these credible document, this 1023 form that said Joe Biden had been involved in a bribery scheme.
00:22:23.540And yet no one with the FBI would allow them to investigate this any further.
00:22:29.640So let's turn to the president now, because and I want to go through some of the lies you go back.
00:22:36.140And I think we should play that montage of Joe Biden when he was running for president and saying, I made no money.
00:22:44.980I was never connected to my son or family businesses.
00:22:47.880There was no connections to China that this you know, this is a lie.
00:23:31.800But explain methodically for everyone watching and listening how we now have the facts to back up that he was lying to the American people every time he said that, every time the White House said it, every time every Democrat said it on his behalf, every surrogate on his campaign.
00:23:47.180Well, when we began the investigation, the political narrative and the media narrative was that Joe Biden never met with or spoke to any of these mysterious people who were sending his family millions and millions of dollars.
00:24:00.040Now we know through pictures, text messages, emails, WhatsApp messages, and depositions from Devin Archer that Joe Biden talked to all of them.
00:24:11.560We also discovered the pseudonym emails where Joe Biden was using a pseudonym, a fake name, sending emails back and forth to Eric Sherwin, who was one of the main figures in this influence peddling scheme.
00:24:26.340In fact, he was like, for all practical purposes, the bookkeeper or the chief financial officer.
00:24:31.960Joe Biden also said he had a wall between the government and his son's family business dealings.
00:24:53.640The National Archives wouldn't turn him over.
00:24:55.740And then, lo and behold, some of them pop up in this recent indictment in California.
00:25:01.280Some of these pseudonym emails between Joe Biden and Sherwin were brought out as evidence.
00:25:08.040So how many fake email accounts and how many burner phones have you all found for Joe Biden?
00:25:15.500Well, I can't comment on the burner phone yet because we're still looking into that and triple checking some things.
00:25:22.060But with respect to the email, he's had at least three that he communicated, three pseudonym emails that he used the government email for.
00:25:32.540And then he had some other pseudonyms, we believe, with some personal emails and some personal communication where he was he was they used code names like the big guy and Celtic and things like that.
00:25:46.660But clearly they were trying to hide something or they wouldn't have had been using the pseudonyms.
00:25:53.280But the fact that, you know, I didn't think we would find government emails from Joe Biden to these people involved in the influence peddling scheme.
00:26:03.700But lo and behold, there are hundreds of them.
00:26:08.960So and let me ask you, James, on on the fake emails, is it just a name?
00:26:15.300If you had an email, Kentucky man, Kentucky man at gmail dot com, you know, someone might pick a name of something, you know, Ben Ferguson, Ole Miss tennis star.
00:26:26.600Like, you know, maybe you pick that as an email.
00:26:29.280Are they signed using fake names or are they signed Ben or James or dad?
00:26:36.340How are they signed and how much on the face of it are the emails trying to obscure the identity of the sender?
00:26:44.000Well, they're all trying to obscure the identity of the sender.
00:26:51.680But, you know, a lot of times the emails aren't aren't signed, but he's communicating back and forth.
00:26:56.900And the most disturbing thing to everyone should be that Hunter was being copied, blind copied on some of these emails.
00:27:06.740That where he was using pseudonyms pertaining to Ukraine at the same time he was going to Joe Biden was going to go over there and fire Victor Shokin, the prosecutor who was investigating Burisma.
00:28:20.820But but Joe Biden is using just a fake name on a government account and is using that fake name to conduct government business and is secretly blind CCing Hunter.
00:28:33.740He's sitting on the border, who's sitting on the border, who's sitting on the border, who's being paid eighty three thousand dollars a month, who has no skills, who doesn't speak Ukrainian, who knows nothing about oil and gas, but has access to daddy.
00:29:57.520And in this podcast, we interview Canada's most inspiring women, entrepreneurs, artists, athletes, politicians and newsmakers, all at different stages of their journey.
00:30:07.000So if you're looking to connect, then we hope you'll join us.
00:30:10.000Listen to the Honest Talk podcast on iHeartRadio or wherever you listen to your podcasts.
00:30:41.880And now we know that Joe had lunch with some of these people.
00:30:46.420We didn't know he had lunch with the Russian oligarch who had sent Hunter Biden three and a half million dollars while Joe Biden was vice president.
00:30:55.300The same Russian oligarch who, when Joe Biden became president, was the one oligarch he left off the sanctions list when Russia invaded Ukraine.
00:31:04.840So, OK, just say that again, because I think it's important for our listeners and our viewers.
00:31:10.520The Democrats, the Democrats, the White House, the corporate media, they all say there's no evidence of corruption, no evidence of corruption and no evidence of Joe Biden's corruption.
00:31:19.240Just say what you just said again, because that is completely contrary to the talking points of the other side.
00:31:26.840One of the things we found out when we interviewed Devin Archer was that Joe Biden actually had lunch with the female oligarch from Russia, the former mayor of Moscow's wife, the wealthiest lady in Russia.
00:31:46.200She had sent Hunter Biden three and a half million dollars while Joe Biden was vice president.
00:31:52.200And we have no idea what the Bidens did to receive the three and a half million dollars.
00:31:57.160That's one of the questions we would ask Hunter Biden in his deposition.
00:32:01.900So we didn't know Joe Biden acted like he'd never met her.
00:32:05.120But Archer said, yeah, they had they had a very long lunch or dinner, like like several hours.
00:32:11.540Do we know where they had lunch or dinner? Do we know that?
00:32:13.600I think it was Cafe Milano, but I'm not I'm not 100 percent certain.
00:32:18.840And when Joe Biden became president and when Russia invaded Ukraine, he announced sanctions against all the oligarchs in Russia, except one.
00:32:30.940The lady who had sent Hunter Biden three and a half million dollars.
00:32:33.920And in the updated because they've updated these sanctions throughout this war with Ukraine.
00:32:38.720Have they ever then added her name to that list?
00:32:42.720Because several times they've updated and added new people to that list.
00:32:45.800Or has she been protected to date by the Biden crime family?
00:32:52.420So, look, there's an important thing to underscore.
00:32:54.680And we've talked about this at length on verdict.
00:32:57.560Bribery, as everyone knows who listens to this pod, requires a quid pro quo, Latin for this, for that.
00:33:05.040And so you need the this, the payment, the benefit, and you need it in exchange for that.
00:33:11.240And that is typically a government, either an affirmative failure or declining to do something that because of the payment.
00:33:20.460In this instance, three and a half million dollars from a Russian oligarch to Hunter.
00:33:26.180And again, and James, jump in if anything I'm saying is wrong, but but there's no indication Hunter did anything of value, has any expertise in anything related to Russia, has any services, has any skills, did anything that someone would pay three and a half million dollars for.
00:33:43.280We do know that that along with the payment, this Russian oligarch has lunch or dinner with Joe Biden while he is vice president.
00:33:54.320So that is direct access, direct access, direct conversation to Joe.
00:34:00.160Hey, you know, I'm giving your son three and a half million dollars.
00:34:02.760You know, we don't know he said that, but it'd be kind of weird in the conversation that if either she or Hunter didn't tell daddy, hey, this is the person that gave me three and a half million dollars, particularly if this is not proven, although we know the laptop makes reference with regard to China to 10 percent for the big guy.
00:34:23.100And to the extent that there is a pattern of Joe profiting directly off of Hunter's revenue, he would have a real reason to care about the three and a half million.
00:34:33.340But the thing that is new that is connected here is that when Joe becomes president and he puts in sanctions on Russian oligarchs, the one person that is miraculously left off is the oligarch that gave Hunter three and a half million dollars.
00:34:50.200So that's a second example of a quo. We've talked quite a bit about the firing of Viktor Shokin.
00:34:56.320Viktor Shokin was the Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating Burisma.
00:35:00.420The oligarch that owned Burisma paid Hunter a million dollars a year and Joe Biden got him fired.
00:35:06.520That's a quo that would would, I believe, support a bribery claim.
00:35:12.060This is a second quo that could support a bribery claim, which is not listing someone for sanctions who otherwise should be listed and who would have been listed.
00:35:22.200But for the payment to your family member, that qualifies as bribery as well.
00:35:30.880It's accurate. I wish you were on the oversight committee to help me with all this.
00:35:34.600I have a question for both of you. And and I go back to when I was on the Bush campaign, even as someone younger, there was a very clear warning that was given to us and it was explicit.
00:35:47.800Be careful who you meet with. Be careful about any meeting on the clock or off the clock with anybody that could be nefarious.
00:35:55.480And I remember that meeting because it was such a important line here.
00:36:01.180Is there any reason? And I want to know more about the background of this of this oligarch and this woman, richest woman in Russia connected directly to Vladimir Putin.
00:36:12.260You don't get the job as the mayor of Moscow without Vladimir Putin's explicit picking you and consent and being in that world.
00:36:19.920Would this be a meeting that our U.S. government would have warned against?
00:36:24.940Like, you don't meet with this type of person. You certainly don't do business with this type of person.
00:36:30.200You don't take three and a half million from this type of person.
00:36:32.820I mean, would that not be some sort of conversation that would have happened?
00:36:36.060Of course. Listen, this is friggin weird. This is weird.
00:36:40.500This is not something that, oh, this is typical what people in government do.
00:36:44.980You don't run around having dinner with Russian oligarchs.
00:36:48.560That that is a strange thing to do. I don't know anyone else in government.
00:36:52.940I don't know anyone else in the Senate. I don't know anyone else in the House who does that.
00:36:56.820I don't know anyone else getting millions of dollars from foreign countries.
00:37:01.580It's friggin weird. James, I'm going to go out on a limb.
00:37:04.900Have you received millions of dollars from any foreign country?
00:37:08.820No, but I keep expecting the Associated Press or Washington Post to write that.
00:37:29.920To the best of my knowledge, none of them, none other than Bob Menendez, who is under indictment.
00:37:36.620So let me set him aside because he's under indictment for this.
00:37:41.080That's actually a pretty powerful point.
00:37:43.020The only person I know who did something like this is currently being prosecuted for receiving bribes because Bob Menendez, it is alleged, did government favors for Egypt, was paid tens of thousands of dollars, was paid in gold bars.
00:37:58.120And they're trying to put him in jail.
00:38:01.000Well, where is the indictment for Joe Biden?
00:38:04.120Because it's Joe Biden that's performing the government favors.
00:38:08.400And the closest analog I can find to someone who has done conduct similar to what Joe Biden did, although not as brazen, not as large scale, not as lucrative, not involving as many countries.
00:38:24.540The closest analogy is Bob Menendez to Joe Biden.
00:38:28.060And if they're indicting Bob Menendez, why on earth are they not indicting Joe?
00:38:33.040And why are they not indicting Hunter for bribery?
00:38:35.880I get the tax claims, but we've talked at length about this.
00:38:41.460At the end of the day, this is not about Hunter Biden.
00:38:45.480If his name was Hunter Smith and he was some corrupt, messed up guy with substance abuse problems, none of us would be talking about it.
00:38:54.000He would be prosecuted, he'd face consequences, but it's not his life, it's not his personal demons that matter.
00:39:01.740It is when you have the vice president of the United States and then the president of the United States selling official favors in a corrupt way to foreign oligarchs.
00:39:12.000There is a reason the Constitution specifies bribery as a ground for impeachment.
00:41:50.560And he also says the media has investigated this and no one's found any wrongdoing.
00:41:56.720Here's the president in a montage in his own words.
00:41:59.000Every single solitary, serious investigator, including your network and others, have looked at this, have said there's absolutely zero basis to the accusation that I acted anyway inappropriately or that my son did.
00:42:16.440Every major national, international and local news operations looked into it has said it's a lie.
00:43:21.340I do not think it means what you think it means.
00:43:23.500I'm not sure Joe knows what the word scintilla means.
00:43:26.840So let me just ask you directly, James, what is the most compelling evidence that you are aware of right now of corruption by Joe Biden?
00:43:39.660Well, the fact that we found five payments to Joe Biden, that we trace the source of the payment directly from his family's influence peddling scheme.
00:43:51.700So when Joe Biden says that he's never benefited from his family's influence peddling scheme, that is a lie.
00:45:19.600So, so I'm aware of the 10% for the big guy that was in the information on Hunter's laptop.
00:45:26.620What I was not aware of is that you now have a payment from China and direct evidence, by the way, not circumstantial, direct evidence of a 10% payment straight to Joe Biden.
00:45:57.540So just to explain that again, it's, it's important not to miss this point.
00:46:01.420If you'll remember the WhatsApp message where Hunter Biden was shaking down the, the Chinese national saying,
00:46:07.520we expect you to fulfill your commitment, we expect you to fulfill your commitment, a commitment that was made while Joe Biden was vice president.
00:46:12.700He said, my dad's sitting here beside me and we're going to unleash our wrath on you if you don't.
00:46:18.700Five days later, five business days later, $5 million pops into the Biden account.
00:46:25.600They immediately wire $400,000 to this shell company that was supposed to be the company that, that Joe Biden was going to be 10% owner of, according to Bobulinski.
00:46:38.480From that $400,000, they start wiring different wires to different Biden family members in different shells.
00:46:47.200This is called money laundering and it's confusing to explain and that's by design.
00:46:51.200But anyway, they wire money to Jim Biden from that $400,000 and he writes Joe a check for $40,000.
00:47:00.660$40,000 is 10% of $400,000 in that particular shell that Joe Biden was supposed to have a 10% ownership in.
00:48:01.720We've talked about the tax issues with, with Hunter Biden and, and James Biden.
00:48:07.860I think there's some more questions there.
00:48:09.460But if all of this is happening and money is running through to the president or then vice president, what are the liabilities that we don't know about?
00:48:19.920And I'm talking from a tax standpoint for the president of the United States of America, because what we do know is there's money flowing in.
00:48:27.720Then they claim its loans and there's claiming there's repayment of loans, but we don't see the reclaim it payments.
00:48:32.220So is that a tax issue for the president?
00:48:36.980If the bank accounts, these shell companies were acting as piggy banks for Hunter Biden and the Biden crime family.
00:48:45.220We've also heard there were payments being made for things that benefited the vice president and the president through things that were done at their house, his house, home improvements, remodeling.
00:48:57.920What other benefits was President Joe Biden receiving through this money that wasn't directly coming to his bank account?
00:49:05.120And would that be a tax issue in theory for the president of the United States of America?
00:49:08.760I think so. So a lot of these shell companies had credit cards.
00:49:14.180So we got the bank account and it'll say, all right, we spent $15,000 this month on our Citibank card or our Chase card or whatever.
00:49:24.500We have to subpoena the credit card companies and start going down these bank statements.
00:49:29.220I mean, this is stuff, this investigation is so big and so complex and so complicated.
00:49:35.620I mean, we're moving as quickly as we can for a little old congressional staff.
00:49:40.360This is stuff the IRS and the FBI and the Department of Justice are better suited to do, but we're doing the best we can.
00:49:46.580So we know from the laptop there were things Hunter Biden was paying for a value for Joe, like a new roof and a cell phone bill and things like that.
00:49:55.460But the $250,000. Hold on a second. Did you just say Hunter Biden paid for a new roof for Joe Biden?
00:50:02.340According to the laptop, according to the laptop.
00:50:05.220And remember, there's message from Hunter Biden to Hunter Biden's daughter saying, unlike dad, I won't make I won't make you have to turn over 50 percent of your salary to me.
00:50:17.520So there's lots of references in the laptop where Hunter Biden was complaining about having to pay for stuff for dad, for Joe Biden.
00:50:24.680And that's why we wanted to depose him. That's why we wanted to. That was one of the questions.
00:50:29.540Let's go to the deposition. Were you surprised that Hunter defied the subpoena and refused to sit for the deposition?
00:50:36.540I wasn't because I felt like that indictment was done to protect him from this deposition, because you've indicted.
00:50:46.740Yes, you've indicted him for two things. The line on a gun application and his basic failure to pay taxes on his W-2 income.
00:50:56.680All right. Those are the two things that you really can't tie to Joe Biden.
00:51:00.440But the money laundering, you can tie to Joe Biden. The the the loans, the tax evasion on that, the securities fraud, even the even the the problems with prostitutes and possible human trafficking and all that.
00:51:14.700You can tie that to Joe because some of that was at Joe's house.
00:51:17.960Apparently, there's lots of things that hold on a second, James.
00:51:20.940You said possible human trafficking. What what what is the evidence we have of that?
00:51:26.780There's a suspicious activity report filed against an escort service in Florida.
00:51:33.340And the suspicious activity report is on the escort service.
00:51:37.200But Hunter Biden is a subject of that suspicious activity report because he was a big customer and sending money to and from the bank notified.
00:51:47.260And this is public, not because of us. You're not supposed to leak these suspicious activity reports, but it's out there.
00:51:53.480It's out there on the Internet. I think it was in that Marco Polo report.
00:51:57.840But we know it's real. And what it what it said was the bank notified.
00:52:04.920I think it was J.P. Morgan notified the Treasury that we believe this.
00:52:08.440Our client is operating an escort service and the two prostitutes that they're paying are here illegally.
00:52:15.960One from Russia, one from Ukraine. I mean, you can't make this stuff up.
00:52:20.660And we don't know if they were human traffic. We don't know if all we know is they're not here legally.
00:52:26.600And we're pretty sure they're engaged in prostitution, which is illegal in Florida.
00:52:32.400And they list like two or three names of people that were spending a lot of money there.
00:52:38.700And Hunter Biden was at the top of the list, which is another reason they filed the SAR, because they knew Russia and Ukraine, human trafficking.
00:52:46.400And at the time he was living in Joe Biden's house, they were sending the prostitutes to him.
00:52:52.000He wasn't going there. So they were sending them across state lines, which is, you know, you know, is there evidence that they were sending the prostitutes to Joe Biden's house?
00:53:01.420All we know is Hunter was living there at the time.
00:53:06.140We don't know if he was going to a hotel or whatever, but I'm just telling you what J.P. Morgan said.
00:53:11.740OK, I mean, so let me ask you about more.
00:53:15.380Let me ask you about the deposition. So hunters refuse to testify.
00:53:18.660What happens next in the next week, two weeks, three weeks, four weeks?
00:53:23.460What happens next? Well, we're going to have to issue contempt of Congress charges.
00:53:29.040We'll run that through the Oversight Committee.
00:53:32.320And now tell people how that works. What are the mechanics of what has to happen?
00:53:36.580I was hoping Jim Jordan would lead that through the judiciary, but it looks like we're going to do it through the House Oversight Committee.
00:53:43.040There's a lot of paperwork that's going to have to get done.
00:53:45.680Remember, we've got a new speaker of the House, all new staff rolling in.
00:53:50.100Now, he kept some of McCarthy's staff on until the end of the year.
00:53:55.780So we're going to try to get all this accumulated as quickly as possible and then have a committee here and then hopefully mark it up on the floor.
00:54:03.020But there's a lot of legwork that has to be done, a lot of documentation that has to be accumulated.
00:54:08.920And we're doing this at a time when we're shifting a lot of people in the speaker's office.
00:54:14.700And one thing, Senator, a lot of people don't realize, I have subpoena authority, but the speaker has to sign off on it.
00:54:21.100That's something that Daryl Isis talked about and Trey Gowdy's talked about and Jason Chaffetz, former Republican chairs.
00:54:28.940The speaker's general counsel has to sign off on it because if it goes to court, they're the ones that represent us in court.
00:55:04.540And in this podcast, we interview Canada's most inspiring women, entrepreneurs, artists, athletes, politicians and newsmakers, all at different stages of their journey.
00:55:14.300So if you're looking to connect, then we hope you'll join us.
00:55:17.540Listen to the Honest Talk podcast on iHeartRadio or wherever you listen to your podcasts.
00:56:29.280We were going to ask them specific questions, hundreds of questions.
00:56:33.060If you have a committee hearing where you have 25 Republicans and 21 Democrats going back and forth, yelling, the Democrats at the last year, and they filed three motions to adjourn during the committee hearing, trying to disrupt it.
00:56:47.020You get five minutes each back and forth.
00:56:53.180So it's a difference of 40 or 45 questions in a complete chaotic poop scene versus a sit down, substantive deposition where we could easily ask 800 questions.