ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Verdict with Ted Cruz
- May 17, 2021
What Happens in Wuhan, Stays in Wuhan
Episode Stats
Length
18 minutes
Words per Minute
166.1578
Word Count
3,102
Sentence Count
218
Misogynist Sentences
3
Hate Speech Sentences
3
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.660
Guaranteed human.
00:00:04.280
There is a whole lot going on.
00:00:06.160
You know what?
00:00:07.300
You know what?
00:00:07.840
Enough.
00:00:08.700
Enough from me.
00:00:09.860
I've talked enough on this show.
00:00:11.720
This episode, I only want to hear from you.
00:00:14.360
This is Verdict with Ted Cruz.
00:00:21.880
Senator, I say this with no false modesty.
00:00:25.560
I've been asking too many questions of late.
00:00:27.720
We have not been taking nearly enough questions from the mailbag of our wonderful Verdict
00:00:32.440
subscribers who regularly leave us five-star reviews on Apple Podcasts, which we greatly
00:00:36.920
appreciate if you wouldn't mind doing that right now, who subscribe to us on YouTube,
00:00:41.460
who listen to us on all of the podcasting apps that they have.
00:00:44.980
So what do you say?
00:00:45.580
Should we just make this all about the mailbag?
00:00:48.020
I think that's a great idea.
00:00:49.060
But I will say when you talk about YouTube subscribers, as of this week, we're at 194,000,
00:00:54.180
which means we're just 6,000 short of 200,000.
00:00:56.620
It'd be nice to break that mark.
00:00:58.180
I'm not saying you have to.
00:00:59.460
Just throwing that out there, folks.
00:01:00.880
We would love it if you would go and subscribe, particularly now when big tech is trying to
00:01:05.780
suppress all of the conservative voices.
00:01:07.980
Without further ado, Senator, first question from Mark.
00:01:11.760
This is a little bit of a flattering question for us, so that's obviously why I wanted to
00:01:15.960
choose it first.
00:01:17.440
Mark writes,
00:01:18.160
I just watched that hearing with Dr. Fauci.
00:01:22.580
I've just been seeing the Wuhan Institute in the news.
00:01:26.660
I've just been seeing reports about U.S. funding of Wuhan Institute research.
00:01:34.100
Where did I hear about all of that?
00:01:36.420
Oh, that's right.
00:01:37.540
Last year on Verdict with Ted Cruz.
00:01:40.440
Keep up the great work.
00:01:41.600
Love the show.
00:01:42.520
I guess that's not really a comment.
00:01:44.020
I suppose that's just applaud it, but I'll take it.
00:01:47.080
You're right.
00:01:47.720
A year ago on Verdict, we talked about the Wuhan Institute for Virology.
00:01:52.140
We don't know for sure if that's the source of the virus.
00:01:56.140
Why?
00:01:57.020
Because the Chinese government destroyed all the records and prevents anyone from actually
00:02:00.860
determining what happened in the Wuhan Institute for Virology.
00:02:04.440
But today, my colleague, Senator Rand Paul, had a very effective series of questions with
00:02:09.980
Anthony Fauci, where he asked him about, you know, do you regret the NIH giving a bunch
00:02:15.260
of money for the Wuhan Institute for Virology?
00:02:17.520
And Fauci, you want to talk about someone who's just unrepentant?
00:02:22.400
He almost said to Rand, screw you, because everything about Fauci's demeanor and temperament
00:02:28.860
was, you know, you know, it reminded me of like a guy in Goodfellas, you know, hurling
00:02:39.280
Italian curse words at Rand.
00:02:41.700
And Michael, I don't mean to upset you by suggesting that Italians can curse.
00:02:46.420
Yeah, I've never heard it.
00:02:47.680
The defiance of it.
00:02:49.080
I mean, Fauci, like, doesn't apologize for sending a bunch of money to Wuhan, doesn't
00:02:55.340
express any responsibility.
00:02:57.280
I think it is more likely than not that the virus escaped from one of those two labs.
00:03:03.140
It's not proven, it's circumstantial, but the odds are exceptionally daunting that you
00:03:11.180
would have labs studying this exact kind of virus exactly where the outbreak occurs and
00:03:16.480
there not be a connection.
00:03:17.700
And I think we need to have a serious, credible investigation to figure it out.
00:03:21.740
And Fauci doesn't seem remotely concerned.
00:03:24.980
He changes what he says seemingly every week.
00:03:28.880
And every time he says it, he is confident as hell until next week he says something different.
00:03:33.380
Of course.
00:03:34.040
And he'll have the same confidence that following week.
00:03:36.480
You know, this observation, this strange coincidence of the presence of the Wuhan Institute
00:03:41.900
of Virology, right where the virus was found, right near this supposedly awful wet market.
00:03:48.540
400 bloody yards.
00:03:50.120
400 yards.
00:03:51.900
That ain't far.
00:03:52.860
Yes.
00:03:53.420
This is being called a conspiracy theory.
00:03:55.580
It was being called a conspiracy theory last year, more than a year ago now, I guess,
00:03:59.360
when we were speaking about it.
00:04:00.400
And you know how much I hate to say we told you so, but I am pleased that we talked about
00:04:05.600
it on the show.
00:04:06.460
Well, and you remember, Michael, we talked about how the Washington Post and other reporters
00:04:11.640
tried to refute the, quote, conspiracy theory.
00:04:14.820
And their refutation was that if you looked at the genetic markers, and this is where it's
00:04:19.440
dangerous to have a lawyer pretending to talk about science because I'm not a medical
00:04:23.100
doctor or virologist, but the Washington Post reported that if you looked at the genetic
00:04:27.520
markers, they didn't believe it was a virus that was constructed in a lab, but rather one
00:04:33.100
that occurred naturally in nature.
00:04:36.120
And so they said, oh, the theory that the escape from the lab is bogus.
00:04:40.220
Look, I find that plausible.
00:04:41.940
Could it have been constructed in the lab?
00:04:43.420
Sure.
00:04:43.620
And I think that needs to be investigated.
00:04:45.900
But I find it an entirely plausible hypothesis that this was a naturally occurring virus
00:04:52.420
that they discovered in a cave in China.
00:04:55.300
And by the way, the bats in question have caves 900 miles away from the wet market.
00:04:59.640
Right, right.
00:05:00.440
So it last I checked, most bats don't fly 900 miles to hang out in a wet market and spread
00:05:07.660
a pandemic.
00:05:08.840
But I think the most likely hypothesis is they were studying a naturally occurring virus in
00:05:16.020
the lab and somebody was sloppy.
00:05:18.100
Do I believe the Chinese government deliberately released this?
00:05:21.460
Probably not.
00:05:22.240
I don't think the chances are zero.
00:05:24.080
But I think the most likely thing is someone was sloppy and either an animal or person got
00:05:28.120
it.
00:05:28.280
But it spread outside the lab.
00:05:30.940
And then what the Chinese government did do is cover it up, hide it, arrest the whistleblowers,
00:05:36.120
do everything they could to suppress it, which allowed it to become a pandemic and spread
00:05:40.580
across the globe.
00:05:41.740
Next question from Thomas.
00:05:42.980
I would like to hear the senator's prediction on the Hyde Amendment.
00:05:46.180
The Hyde Amendment theoretically stops taxpayer dollars from going to fund abortion.
00:05:50.760
Obviously, money is fungible.
00:05:52.040
So if money is going to an abortion organization, then obviously they're going to spend the money.
00:05:59.000
But this is now coming under threat by Democrats, including Joe Biden, who for years said they
00:06:04.300
support the Hyde Amendment.
00:06:05.360
Now they're against it.
00:06:06.020
Yeah.
00:06:06.520
Look, I'm very concerned about the Hyde Amendment.
00:06:08.480
If you look at today's Democrats, they're radicalized.
00:06:12.200
They're radicalized on virtually every issue.
00:06:14.920
You know, we've talked in this podcast about the book I wrote a few months ago called One
00:06:19.240
Vote Away, How a Single Supreme Court Seat Can Change History.
00:06:22.640
There's a chapter in that book on abortion, on life.
00:06:25.560
And it talks about how today's Democrats, their position is they support unlimited abortion
00:06:32.980
on demand up until the moment of birth, partial birth abortion, with no parental notification,
00:06:39.180
with no parental consent, and with full taxpayer funding, with the taxpayers paying for the
00:06:44.020
abortion.
00:06:44.900
And that view is so extreme, 9% of Americans agree with it.
00:06:50.420
So 91% of Americans disagree with the unlimited radical abortion view that right now is the
00:06:57.820
view of just about every Democratic politician in Washington.
00:07:00.560
When it comes to the Hyde Amendment, Democrats want your tax dollars to pay for abortions across
00:07:07.560
the country.
00:07:08.440
We're seeing Joe Biden through executive orders and through regulatory action trying to expand
00:07:13.220
that.
00:07:13.960
And we're also seeing the Democrats, and they're using the vehicle of budget reconciliation to
00:07:19.260
try to get around the filibuster and to ram through funding that ignores the Hyde Amendment.
00:07:23.780
The Hyde Amendment has been the consensus for decades in Washington.
00:07:27.940
Although people can disagree on the question of abortion and protecting life, and you and
00:07:34.080
I are both strongly pro-life, there used to be a wide consensus that it wasn't fair to
00:07:40.080
use taxpayer funds to pay for abortion, to force people who are pro-life to pay for taking
00:07:45.240
the lives of unborn children.
00:07:46.760
Today's Democrats, they don't care about that consensus because they've been radicalized.
00:07:52.820
So I think that question is a very real and active threat.
00:07:57.540
Right.
00:07:58.240
Yeah.
00:07:58.520
This was always the fear of the safe, legal, and rare line from Democrats, which never
00:08:03.640
made a lot of sense.
00:08:04.740
If abortion is morally comparable to murder, then it shouldn't be legal.
00:08:08.780
If it's not, if it's just a choice and has no effect on anyone else, then it shouldn't
00:08:13.360
be rare.
00:08:13.900
But that at least was the consensus for a long time.
00:08:16.920
But it would appear that we've ditched the rare part of that argument.
00:08:22.240
Yeah.
00:08:22.420
I mean, that's no longer, Bill Clinton said that in the State of the Union address.
00:08:25.980
There's, I don't know of a Democrat in the Senate who believes that.
00:08:30.680
Yeah.
00:08:30.880
That's no longer their position.
00:08:32.680
Yeah.
00:08:33.420
It is unlimited abortion on demand.
00:08:36.320
And by the way, when we have votes on things, and I talk about this in One Vote Away, when
00:08:40.460
we have votes on things like the pain-capable legislation, which is legislation that says
00:08:45.840
unborn children after 20 weeks of development, the science shows that that unborn child can
00:08:53.300
feel pain, that he or she writhes in pain during abortion, writhes in agony.
00:08:59.340
And it's a limitation on late-term abortions when the unborn child can feel pain.
00:09:05.940
The Democrats vote party-line against that restriction.
00:09:09.300
They're perfectly happy with partial birth abortion, late-term abortion.
00:09:14.140
Most Americans are not.
00:09:16.320
But today's congressional Democrats listen to the radical activists and not actual voters back home.
00:09:23.380
Very practical question from Real Truth Cactus, who I suppose is our colleague on the show.
00:09:28.400
I can't believe that the cactus would write into the show this way.
00:09:31.920
The cactus asks, what are some practical things everyday Americans can do to protect their
00:09:37.180
financial well-being in economically chaotic times such as these?
00:09:42.160
I think inflation is a real risk.
00:09:45.660
That means to the extent you can limit your exposure to variable interest rates, that's a good thing.
00:09:54.320
I think we are likely to see interest rates rising significantly.
00:09:57.920
We're likely to see mortgage rates rising significantly.
00:10:01.780
We're likely to see the cost of goods rising significantly.
00:10:05.160
When you have Joe Biden and the Democrats proposing $6 trillion in new spending, I think there's a good chance
00:10:13.000
that's going to prove significantly inflationary.
00:10:15.700
So to the extent you can hedge yourself against that, that is a good thing.
00:10:21.120
You know, I think we've got cross-cutting economic factors right now.
00:10:25.080
On the plus side, we just went through a year where the entire economy was shut down and we artificially
00:10:32.740
basically froze our GDP and we had a double-digit decrease in GDP.
00:10:38.740
The fact that we've got vaccines now and the economy is opening up means we're seeing economic growth.
00:10:44.760
We're seeing the economy come back significantly.
00:10:48.480
The countervailing factors on that are, number one,
00:10:51.680
I'm hearing over and over again from small businesses and employers that the federal government
00:10:57.260
is paying people more not to work than to work and they're having a very hard time getting
00:11:01.940
employees to come back because, you know, if you pay people not to work, wonder of wonders,
00:11:06.400
they actually don't work.
00:11:08.220
I also think the massive taxes and regulations coming from the Biden administration are going
00:11:12.600
to hammer the economy and see you've got kind of two vectors.
00:11:18.240
One, the economy taking off because it's reopening, two, the taxes and regulations pushing it down.
00:11:24.260
How that plays out exactly, I don't know.
00:11:27.540
I'm not smart enough to have a crystal ball on the economy, but I think I would expect some
00:11:36.140
real volatility.
00:11:37.780
And so, you know, to the extent you can save, to the extent you can invest in investments
00:11:43.960
that are guarded against inflation, and that often includes things like real estate, includes things
00:11:51.100
like commodities, like gold and silver, where if there's inflation, real estate or gold and silver
00:11:55.860
are likely to go up to go along with inflation.
00:12:00.400
I think those are all sensible.
00:12:02.480
But with the caveat that I ain't your fiduciary, and if you're taking financial advice from a lawyer
00:12:10.320
and Supreme Court litigator who's a senator, you might want to rethink your financial priorities
00:12:15.840
to begin with.
00:12:16.640
Well, I'll tell you, Senator, I just assumed you would tell people to invest everything
00:12:19.740
in Dogecoin or something.
00:12:20.940
You know, that was always my really stable investment strategy.
00:12:23.960
And depending on the hour of the day, I'm either bankrupt or a trillionaire.
00:12:27.580
Yeah, I got to admit, Michael, so the whole Bitcoin, Dogecoin, I have some friends who've
00:12:34.120
invested in it who've actually done quite well, and they've encouraged me.
00:12:37.140
I have not invested anything in it, and maybe I'm a fool.
00:12:39.280
No, nor have I.
00:12:40.480
I don't really understand it.
00:12:42.400
I don't really understand it.
00:12:44.100
And I'm, you know, worried.
00:12:45.120
You know, you look at like Holland and the tulip bulb mania, where tulip bulbs got bid
00:12:49.980
up and up and up and up, and it became a bubble, and then it all cratered, and everyone lost
00:12:54.640
everything.
00:12:55.320
And maybe I'm just a Luddite, and I don't understand that Bitcoin is the future.
00:13:00.640
I think it's fine if people want to do it.
00:13:02.300
I'm quite libertarian about it.
00:13:04.040
But in terms of my assets to invest, I don't like to invest in things that I don't fully
00:13:10.000
understand.
00:13:10.420
And I will readily admit, I don't fully understand the Bitcoin world.
00:13:14.160
Well, I don't know about you.
00:13:14.880
I think the bulbs are coming back.
00:13:16.260
I'm very long, tulip.
00:13:17.720
But I guess only time will tell.
00:13:20.100
Before we go, this question actually is incendiary, but I find it difficult to answer.
00:13:26.880
This is from Chelsea, who says, hey, Michael, big fan of the show, which president is worse,
00:13:33.080
Joe Biden or Woodrow Wilson?
00:13:36.400
All right.
00:13:36.600
So as you know, Woodrow Wilson, I have a slight bias towards because he was president of Princeton
00:13:41.120
University, and I am a Princeton alum.
00:13:43.080
It's true.
00:13:43.440
Although I'll tell you, you want to talk about something irritating?
00:13:46.240
So when I was in college, I was a college debater.
00:13:51.440
As you know, I was one of the cool kids.
00:13:54.680
Going to all those cool debate parties every weekend.
00:13:56.880
Oh, yeah.
00:13:57.640
Yeah.
00:13:57.980
Very, very impressive.
00:13:59.200
Red Solo cups, kegs of stale beer, but, you know, really cutting edge stuff.
00:14:04.740
So the debating society at Princeton is called the American Whig Cliosophic Society, and it
00:14:11.720
was actually two different societies.
00:14:14.280
One was the American Whigs.
00:14:15.740
The other was the Cliosophic Society.
00:14:17.360
They're all they're both over 200 years old.
00:14:19.980
One, the American Whigs was founded by James Madison, the father of the Constitution.
00:14:24.380
Cliosophic Society was founded by William Patterson.
00:14:27.600
The two merged.
00:14:28.980
And today, the Cliosophic Society are the conservatives and the Whigs are the liberals.
00:14:34.160
I actually find it ironic because James Madison, the founder of the Whigs, I agree with on practically
00:14:39.380
everything.
00:14:39.900
But when I was in college, I was chairman of the Cliosophic Society, so the conservative
00:14:45.500
part of the debating society.
00:14:47.020
And in 2016, Whig Clio awarded me their James Madison medal for public service while following
00:14:59.560
the whole January 6th thing and the left and the academic world going into a fit and screaming
00:15:08.580
insurrection and doing it completely disconnected to actual facts of what I did as a senator giving
00:15:16.860
a speech on the Senate floor and urging for a commission to examine electoral claims of
00:15:21.640
election fraud.
00:15:22.340
The students voted to rescind my James Madison award, which frankly kind of irritated me that
00:15:29.900
you have a bunch of lefty students who decided we want to rescind the award.
00:15:33.500
The trustees of Whig Clio actually vetoed the students' decision.
00:15:38.340
So they didn't, in fact, rescind my award, but the students voted.
00:15:41.720
And it was apparently a pretty close vote.
00:15:43.280
It was something like 36 to 37 to 35 or something like that.
00:15:46.320
So all of which is a digression to say Woodrow Wilson, before he was president, was governor
00:15:52.460
of New Jersey.
00:15:53.060
Before he was governor of New Jersey, he was president of Princeton University.
00:15:55.800
So I have some mild predilection towards Wilson.
00:16:00.680
That being said, Wilson was an avowed racist, which is consistent with a lot of Democrats.
00:16:07.580
He aired a film about the Ku Klux Klan in the White House.
00:16:12.280
He was a massive progressive.
00:16:13.780
He pushed the League of Nations.
00:16:16.640
He pushed the Federal Reserve.
00:16:18.920
He pushed the income tax.
00:16:20.320
He did a lot of damage.
00:16:22.220
So Wilson set up the disaster that has befallen us.
00:16:28.140
That being said, what Joe Biden is doing, he has handed the government over to Schumer and
00:16:35.480
Pelosi and to Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and AOC.
00:16:39.460
And they're pushing the most radical agenda.
00:16:41.900
We're 100 days in, there's never been a president with a more radical agenda than we've seen
00:16:46.820
these first 100 days.
00:16:47.680
So as problematic as Wilson is, and Wilson did a lot of damage, I am not a Woodrow Wilson
00:16:54.460
fan.
00:16:56.060
I think Biden, if he succeeds with a radical agenda that's coming from Bernie and AOC and
00:17:01.460
Elizabeth Warren, would do even more damage to the country than Wilson did.
00:17:05.160
And you're seeing in some ways Woodrow Wilson is this progressive genius who sets up progressivism
00:17:11.280
in the federal government.
00:17:12.700
But now you're seeing the flowering of that.
00:17:14.480
So Joe Biden, you know, I don't think he's a deeply red man.
00:17:18.920
I don't think he's particularly scholarly.
00:17:21.800
I'm not telling tales out of school here.
00:17:23.680
He's had some issues with his academic claims over the years.
00:17:26.540
But he is, as you say, boring but radical.
00:17:29.660
He's kind of the flowering of that.
00:17:30.980
So I would have to agree.
00:17:32.440
And Senator, before we go, just to give you one more book club, it occurred to me when
00:17:35.840
you mentioned the very tense vote between the trustees of the society that that vote
00:17:41.160
was very nearly one vote away.
00:17:43.120
If only they had read your book, perhaps they would have understood the law better, the matters
00:17:47.000
at stake.
00:17:47.700
We have to hold it there.
00:17:48.820
We look forward to taking more mailbag questions from our wonderful subscribers very soon.
00:17:53.840
Please send those in.
00:17:55.420
If you happen to leave a five-star review on Apple while you do that, if you happen to get
00:17:59.980
us over that hurdle on YouTube by subscribing, that would be terrific.
00:18:02.700
In the meantime, I'm Michael Knowles.
00:18:04.480
This is Verdict with Ted Cruz.
00:18:29.980
plans to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican Party
00:18:34.980
across the nation.
00:18:36.820
This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:18:39.260
Guaranteed human.
Link copied!