00:00:27.800welcome back folks uh thanks for joining um i'm i'm smiling somewhat laughing a bit because i was
00:00:36.840on the elevator downstairs coming up and i only show up like a few minutes before the show and
00:00:42.760just in the lobby was one of the senior uh producers here at the show josh and he asked me
00:00:49.800he's like what are you going to talk about today and i just laughed i'm like well i have a long
00:00:54.920list of topics but i don't think i'm going to get to too many of them and then um and then i asked
00:01:02.280when i got in studio here i asked uh john if we had done a live show commentary yet on the events
00:01:11.720of yesterday and he tells me no uh because cory had done his show earlier so then uh you know the
00:01:17.880the rulings were subsequent to cory's event so anyway so good news for me i'm uh i'm the first
00:01:23.960live chat about the big events i got a breaking story that's awesome um so before we go too deep
00:01:31.840welcome back it is uh i think this is about the 13th episode now that we've done uh they're they're
00:01:38.300getting better you guys are calling but this is a show about you right i have topics but i want to
00:01:43.900hear what's on your mind and that only happens if you call that number on the screen right there
00:01:50.020four seven nine whatever west i'll memorize it someday uh eight six six four seven nine west
00:01:56.980and extension seven one one and then uh john will put you in queue and we'll chat um so
00:02:06.500i think i'll remember i mean i was expecting a i was expecting a ruling
00:02:11.060no let me backtrack i wasn't expecting a ruling this week right so the injunction um
00:02:16.820the injunction, there was two rulings, right? There was two rulings because there was two
00:02:22.900cases before the court. Both were sort of happened simultaneously, right? They happened about a month
00:02:29.140ago between April 7th, 8th, 9th. One was a, one First Nation group was challenging the petition
00:02:37.880itself. And I honestly didn't think there was any real grounds on for that group. And then there
00:02:46.680another group simultaneously was trying to go with a broader injunction just to pause the process
00:02:53.800and um and that was a month ago and at the time after hearing all the arguments from the
00:03:00.840plaintiffs i guess and from the defendant from the alberta prosperity project and stay free
00:03:05.960alberta etc etc the judge stayed the petition process put a halt to it we saw what happened
00:03:13.560last week the signatures were collected handed in to uh to elections alberta and and the stay
00:03:20.520was 30 days so from april 10th to about you know may 10th so we expected kind of a ruling somewhere
00:03:27.960around this time but i was on the camp i was on the side that honestly thought there won't be a
00:03:34.040ruling that they're just gonna that the judge is just gonna delay delay delay extend the stay
00:03:42.120until um too much time passes and we can't have a referendum so i was quite surprised yesterday i'm
00:03:48.920in the backyard minding my own business doing my gardening garden 75 in by the way and uh and then
00:03:55.960all of a sudden somebody uh calls text me and uh calls me and says uh did you see the ruling i'm
00:04:03.480like no i did not didn't expect it and then i went through the ruling the first post i saw on the
00:04:10.040ruling i cheered i was like and me and perhaps i was too quick out of the gate with that one but
00:04:16.120i cheered because the first part i literally read page like 28 right you you sort of scroll through
00:04:22.680the ruling and you go to the bottom because you want to really like i just want to see the
00:04:25.800conclusion like i'm just jumping ahead i want to see how this book ends and and right there it's
00:04:31.240like uh i'm i'm the judge says i'm rejecting the injunction well holy smokes like i'm cheering
00:04:38.440right like i'm immediately posting about this saying like wow the injunction has been rejected
00:04:43.080my bad i should have read more because um the the the ruling was on multiple on the two cases
00:04:52.200but higher up in there the judge said that um that the petition itself basically was uh
00:05:00.680a no-go um i don't know if she used the words illegal but words to that effect that uh that
00:05:07.000the chief electoral officer when mitch sylvester handed in the form and mish handed in the form
00:05:13.160twice right he handed in the form like uh midway last year and then that ended up in court and
00:05:18.600and there was some argument over the question and everything else and then and then that
00:05:24.360that triggered danielle smith to change the law uh the citizens initiative act to to tweak0.93
00:05:30.120it a little bit and while she was tweaking it and and passing it the judge at that time still
00:05:36.120opined and gave a ruling on the question so the question was thrown back to elections alberta
00:05:43.400and then miss sylvester redrafted his question and we had a new bill from danielle smith
00:05:51.240modifications to the citizens initiatives act and and which is by the way is how things are
00:05:57.080supposed to proceed right governments make laws and sometimes not sometimes almost every time
00:06:02.520laws have to be tested and then and then in the process of testing the laws the courts it's the
00:06:07.880courts who can test the laws uh or citizens who are acting in in good faith on how they interpret
00:06:14.520the laws and then they might get you know stopped and caught and and then so then it ends up in front
00:06:18.680of the courts and then the courts have to adjudicate and then if that's the case it's
00:06:22.600it's quite common for the government to adjust the law and reissue a law so that's just the the way
00:06:27.640it works and uh so the law was modified mitch resubmitted his question and as soon as he did
00:06:34.680that then the first nation group from the athabasca area immediately challenged the whole petition
00:06:41.400again on on the grounds on on various grounds and uh and basically what the judge said yesterday is
00:06:49.000that the petition it needs to be thrown out because steps were missed and and the um chief electoral
00:06:57.560officer shouldn't have uh approved mitch's petition like that's dramatic that's bonkers to
00:07:05.580me right so and and i'll go into i'll try and explain it a little bit further but what this
00:07:11.660means at this point is that that box those those 42 boxes of signatures that are sitting those
00:07:18.180300 000 signatures that are sitting at elections alberta they're they're not going to count them
00:07:23.900They're there. I'm surprised the judge didn't order them destroyed at this point, because I guess the judge knows that by legally there'll be some appeals.
00:07:33.080But but those signatures are sitting there as if they were had never been collected and as if the whole process was illegal.
00:07:42.020And and the basic argument of the ruling is that.
00:07:46.920um the judge looked at the question right do you believe that alberta should cease to be a province
00:07:55.420part of canada and become its own separate state paraphrasing that's not the exact wording and the
00:08:01.500judge looked at that question and said okay if they collect enough signatures so there's two
00:08:07.700outcomes not enough enough if they collect enough signatures then it goes to a referendum and if
00:08:13.020they win the referendum two outcomes don't win win the referendum so one out of the four outcomes is
00:08:19.220a win if that question wins the referendum the that question forces uh the ucp government to do
00:08:30.920something so it can't so that's what the judge is saying that the judge is saying that if you know
00:08:36.220there's a one in four chance that we get enough signatures we win the referendum and this question
00:08:42.440therefore uh forces the hand of danielle smith and the government they can't ignore the win
00:08:48.760they have to act on it the referendum and is binding is basically what the judge said
00:08:54.520and if it's binding and it forces the government to act then it creates a problem because it affects
00:09:00.600treaties and other things and therefore uh and and the consultation needs to occur before so i'd
00:09:08.840always heard you know that that was a possibility and the assumption was that if there is a win
00:09:14.040in the future and there's a pro the ball gets going then the consultation will occur i think
00:09:18.760that makes sense right you you do things one step at a time and then and but in this case the judge
00:09:24.760said nope uh you need to consult now and so basically uh in order to petition our government
00:09:32.200in order for citizens to sit down collect signatures and just petition the government
00:09:36.600they need to consult with first nations before they can even do that and and and i've said it
00:09:44.360all along i mean i have a pro i have a problem with just the whole principle of me having to
00:09:49.400get permission from my government to petition which we did this go around right we we miss
00:09:56.200filled out the form and and and got permission got permission he was okay you go ahead you can
00:10:02.200start collecting signatures collect the signatures on this sheet of paper with a serial number ask
00:10:08.280for proof of citizenship and proof of residence and collect the signature and a physical address
00:10:14.840and sign it in blue and you know what i mean like i already had a problem with that like as a citizen
00:10:22.040the the i have to i have to ask permission from my government to be able to hold my
00:10:27.720government accountable you see it like i mean that makes no sense right so there there should
00:10:31.480be i should be free to do that i mean one of the outcomes for me is is heck who needs permission
00:10:36.840from anybody let's just start this thing all over again and i'll go sit on the side of the road and
00:10:41.080everybody who signed the petition before all 750 people just come on by and re-sign it again on a
00:10:47.640we'll sign down a separate piece of paper i mean that's the most frustrating part for me right now
00:10:52.040is that um those those boxes those 42 boxes with 300 000 signatures are locked up
00:10:59.400like as if they don't exist i wish i wish i wish mitch could go get those boxes and say forget
00:11:07.920about you guys and i'm just going to walk over to danielle smith's office and deposit them there
00:11:14.220now in principle i think that is i mean in principle danielle smith and uh you know pretty
00:11:20.400much every alberton at this point knows that there is an independence movement and that collected
00:11:25.660300,000 signatures and is upset. Let's also remind ourselves that last year, whatever they were
00:11:34.460called, Forever Canada, Thomas Lukasik's group, they collected 400,000 signatures. So Danielle
00:11:41.560Smith has 700,000 signatures in one way or another. And is she going to ignore all of that
00:11:48.460just because a judge said she needs to ignore it? I mean, she's got, boy, she's got a lot to think
00:11:53.540about now, right? She can either appeal and keep kicking the can and the process. And I think1.00
00:12:01.640that's wrong. I think that's a bad option because I predicted this, right? They're going to change
00:12:08.720the rules and every step of the way, they're not going to let us go easily. They're going to keep
00:12:13.000changing the rules. So she can do that, keep trying to fight and adapt and fight in court0.88
00:12:20.780and keep moving and Mitch and so forth.
00:12:48.380and they got an endless supply of money.
00:12:50.500And on the other side, you've got Mitch, an average private citizen who owns a business in Bonneville, who's limited by their rules to only being allowed to raise $552,000.
00:13:03.320So in this war of attrition, not very fair, right?
00:13:09.140Now, yesterday, I don't know. Do you have the clip, John, of Danielle Smith? Just very quickly, her 30 second answer where she said that she didn't think that the, I think I have it. She called it incorrect in law. She called the judge's ruling incorrect in law and anti-democratic.
00:13:35.440the referendum question to the ballot as a government question after the ruling today by
00:13:40.060justice. Well, although our government does support Alberta remaining in Canada, we think
00:13:46.940that today's decision by the court will deny an opportunity to have their petition verified by
00:13:54.160Elections Alberta. We think that this decision is incorrect in law and anti-democratic, and we will
00:14:01.360funding for schools. And of course, this whole ruling dominated the conversation. And when asked
00:14:06.740about it, she said, she's, you know, I'm reading it here. She thought the judge was incorrect
00:14:12.240in interpreting the law and anti-democratic and that her party was going to appeal it or her
00:14:17.700government was going to appeal it. But that doesn't, at the end of the day, all these appeals
00:14:23.140don't help because they just prolong the process. And like I said, I keep worrying that we're going
00:14:28.020to run out of time now um online it's pretty obvious that uh mitch sylvester and stay free
00:14:37.640alberta and others like that they went to a plan i don't know b or c but they started promoting the
00:14:43.420idea of of uh well they've been promoting this idea for a while but everybody should get a ucp
00:14:48.360membership and try and trigger a special general meeting because there'll be an agm there'll be an
00:14:55.440annual general meeting near the end of the year there always is around september october but
00:14:59.380they're saying that um some groups now are trying to um influence the government the ucp and one of
00:15:09.540the funny things is that uh yesterday i not yesterday this morning i don't think this is
00:15:14.860coincidence the ucp website crashed temporarily because i think too many people were trying to
00:15:20.600log in and buy UCP memberships, right? So $10 memberships, there's already like 60,000 UCP
00:15:28.220members. And I think that's a valid path going down the influencing from the inside and trying
00:15:35.820to get Danielle Smith to just hold a referendum. That's in her powers to do. She can do that. She1.00
00:15:43.400We can just add this question on independence on the referendum in October.
00:15:51.200I was thinking there was a third path, but I don't see the third path at this point.
00:16:01.680So please call in, give us a buzz, and let me know what are your thoughts on all of that.
00:16:08.140I mean, the title today was what are the next path, the next steps for the independence movement?
00:16:15.520We're running out of time for this year.
00:16:18.660We're running out of time if we want to get a question in October.
00:16:22.400I think probably the most direct path right now is is to try and influence Danielle Smith as much as possible and get her to just add it to the referendum in October.
00:16:35.560I also wanted to actually, and just on the topic, I mean, I really found like I'm going to have to reread it another time.
00:16:43.080But I really found it interesting in her ruling. Right. The ruling is long.
00:16:46.660Like it was 28 pages. And I really found it interesting that the judge took that, you know, the the the decision tree approach, I called it.
00:16:57.820Right. What if they get the right number of signatures and what if there's a referendum and what if they win?
00:17:02.580And so she went down, she went down the what if they win and ruled on the what if they win. But there was three other outcomes, right? We could not get the right amount of signatures, which would not lead to a referendum, or we could get the right amount of signatures and not win the referendum.
00:17:18.800so there's a lot of outcomes and and um the with that line of thought it it also made it interesting
00:17:28.240that you could have applied the same like uh let me collect my thoughts thomas lukasic's petition
00:17:35.120wasn't challenged why not right i guess that nobody challenged it but but by by her reasoning
00:17:42.400meaning thomas lucasic's petition is also uh illegal and requires some consultation because
00:17:50.580he was asking the inverse of of of stay free alberta's question his question is
00:17:57.760do you support canada or alberta staying in canada well i can do the same thing i can do
00:18:04.660the decision tree and say okay if he's got enough to get it as a referendum question what if he
00:18:10.240loses what if everybody votes no we don't want to stay in canada then doesn't that also trigger
00:18:18.340an obligation on the part of the government which would lead to consultation which would mean that
00:18:22.740his question should have been rejected to start with uh you know keep going there john is that
00:18:29.240our caller on the line or or they okay go ahead call her as usual name please where are you calling
00:18:34.080from marty it's uh james calling from devon can you hear me yeah yeah perfectly how are you
00:18:42.880uh dark sauce this morning man not not a great day cheer up i mean it's not the end of the world
00:18:49.200i'm kind of wondering no no but i'm kind of wondering how much more does alberta need to
00:18:56.400prove to the rest of the country that canada is objectively not a free country not a democratic
00:19:03.040a country not a fair country like how many more stories like this need to pop up in the news
00:19:08.240before the rest of the country wakes up um well i don't think there's an there is no no to the
00:19:18.700answer is there's not enough of these events to make the rest of the country wake up which is why
00:19:22.820we're doing what we're trying to do which is why we're trying to separate right um i i know where
00:19:30.260you're getting at but i think separatists in quebec should be livid this morning yes
00:19:34.260yeah yeah no i agree so separatists in quebec people in saskatchewan should be pissed about
00:19:42.420this decision you know there's there's people in bc i like
00:19:46.140everybody is our justice system just in balance yeah yeah no you're you're you're correct there
00:19:53.440and you remind me of a great point right we do live in a we do live in a common law society
00:19:58.980Except for Quebec. Quebec's got a civil code, but a ruling like this becomes precedent setting for other parts of the country. Absolutely. I think the ones who should be most upset are just everyday citizens who, specifically here in Alberta, but everywhere else, right? I mean, this is an erosion of our democratic rights.
00:20:24.080well we here in alberta have long known that our votes don't matter but i i still think that this
00:20:30.840decision is well i think it's a provocation to be honest with you i think they're they're hoping0.80
00:20:36.760that somebody from the movement does something stupid at this point but i need to urge people0.95
00:20:41.980no don't do anything stupid as much as we're angry at this decision you know the last thing0.99
00:20:47.160we need is somebody going out and doing something exceptionally dumb yeah no i agree i agree no0.98
00:20:53.380thanks for the call um have a great day in devon yeah thank you marty keep doing what you're doing0.69
00:21:01.040my man yeah you're welcome um yeah it's it's um i i heard that sentiment online i mean the sentiment
00:21:10.120online actually that was a that was another observation that was that was made right what
00:21:14.020about the precedent of quebec right quebec had two referendums and how come quebec was able to
00:21:19.880have two referendums and we can't even we never mind a referendum and we can't even get to the
00:21:25.580question like we're not allowed like we need permission to petition i i i still have a hard
00:21:30.080hard hard hard time getting over that that that that uh that citizens who want to just collect
00:21:37.300signatures and ask the government to do something first need permission and need to consult before
00:21:43.140they can even like as step one it's it's uh it's super frustrating um and and tying this into uh
00:21:53.620tying this into carney and the rest of the canada as as uh james was just alluding to i mean the
00:22:00.900the timing of this of some of the announcements that are going on today make this even more
00:22:06.820frustrating right again um so so just this morning ottawa announced what's it called um
00:22:16.500i don't know the exact name but but you know carney announced a big strategy to further
00:22:22.980electrify the country right he wants to double the amount of electric power generation in this
00:22:29.380country so he's betting on electricity uh and i'm not surprised and when he's betting on electricity
00:22:35.060He's talking about renewables and small nuclear and things like that, things that he's not talking about coal-fired power or natural gas-fired or anything like that.
00:22:45.360He's betting on the things that already have, and he wants to double the electricity generation capabilities of the country, which is ridiculous to start with, which is absolutely never going to happen, but it's also not his responsibility.
00:23:03.300like developing resources and developing your electric grid and developing your energy is the
00:23:09.080provincial jurisdiction so carney keeps poking danielle smith in particular and and and you
00:23:17.720know i don't know when she's going to wake up and i'll come back on that but i got a call on the
00:23:21.860line go ahead where are you calling from hello oh did we lose one john
00:24:26.900You have to eliminate the laws, the rules that are scaring away investors, and then you'll bring back investors, and then the pipelines will go.
00:24:36.100But the laws are still in place, the tanker ban and the carbon emissions and all of that that are scaring away investors.
00:24:43.560All right, let's go on the line again.
00:44:15.240Yeah. I drove by the gas pump today and I think it was $1.89. You guys are always
00:44:20.840a little bit cheaper because you've got the refineries nearby but uh um just last question
00:44:26.600while i got you on the line what do you uh if you're danielle smith what would you do right now1.00
00:44:35.160tough one uh well it is a tough one for her because i mean she's sort of walking a fine0.79
00:44:40.840line she's got to put the referendum on regardless regardless you know yeah i mean one of my co-hosts
00:44:49.240No, I was just going to say, Corey Morgan's been talking about this a lot, right?
00:44:56.500Like, Corey's pretty sure that if she doesn't do this, she's starting to – she's putting a nail in her coffin if she doesn't do this quickly.