Western Standard - October 22, 2026


Alberta votes for Canada, but will Canada vote for Alberta?

Hosted by
Mentioned
Premier Smith stands alone

Episode Stats


Length

45 minutes

Words per minute

166.89

Word count

7,625

Sentence count

279

Harmful content

Misogyny

8

sentences flagged

Toxicity

20

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Good day and welcome.
00:00:25.280 Today is October 21st, 2026.
00:00:28.200 I'm Derek Fildebrandt, publisher of the Western Standard, and you're watching The Pipeline.
00:00:32.440 I'm joining remotely from my home in an undisclosed location right now, but in the studio we've
00:00:40.440 got our usual lineup, Senior News Editor Dave Naylor, Senior Columnist Nigel Hannaford,
00:00:47.760 and Senior Columnist Corey Morgan.
00:00:49.440 And joining us for the pleasure of our BC election coverage is our Vancouver reporter, Alex Zoltan.
00:01:01.540 All right. Well, we're going to be, of course, talking about the BC election.
00:01:06.900 It's looking fairly strong, perhaps not certain, but fairly strong for the BC Conservative Party roaring back to life there.
00:01:15.540 We're going to be talking about, of course, the fallout of Alberta's independence referendum and the other nine questions that were held alongside it.
00:01:27.300 And, of course, what is Danielle Smith's next move?
00:01:30.940 She has just released a statement to UCP members that is sure to ruffle some feathers.
00:01:37.420 So we're going to get into it.
00:01:38.560 So first, we're going to talk about the referendum itself.
00:01:41.440 Alberta voted for Canada but will Canada vote for Alberta? So we've got you know everyone's
00:01:53.040 seen the results about one in four Albertans voted to move towards independence three of
00:02:00.040 four Albertans voted against it but at the same time Albertans a majority of Albertans appear to
00:02:07.380 have voted in favor of
00:02:09.380 significant immigration reforms
00:02:11.500 certain
00:02:13.000 racist policies
00:02:14.660 policies that Nahi
00:02:17.300 Nenji calls racist like requiring
00:02:18.800 voter identification, very
00:02:21.260 radical stuff
00:02:22.260 and it appears that
00:02:25.220 of the four constitutional questions
00:02:27.460 that Albertans were asked
00:02:28.960 it's not 100%
00:02:31.440 yet, it looks like three of the
00:02:33.480 four are going to pass
00:02:35.360 possibly two of four we will see um but uh yeah cory what is the big takeaway here from the
00:02:45.680 referendum albertans didn't not uh say they are ready to move towards independence uh but they
00:02:52.160 they you know they did indicate a certain provincialism at least if you will yeah well
00:02:57.660 this was a uh as we can feel a long discussion a five-month campaign really so i i think people
00:03:05.300 should look at this really critically and see what appeared. Because I've seen some dismissing
00:03:11.280 it saying, well, Alberta's always had an independence level of support around 24 or 25%.
00:03:16.240 No, it hasn't. I've been at this a long time. That's considerably larger than we typically
00:03:20.960 have. And when it's actually in a vote in a referendum, I think it's a number that can't
00:03:25.620 be casually dismissed. Though it's certainly, you can casually say we're nowhere close to the
00:03:31.000 point of a majority of Albertans wanting to go right now. The other part was it wasn't just that
00:03:37.720 Albertans weren't ready to embrace a path towards independence. I don't think the independence
00:03:43.020 movement was ready to be able to campaign effectively to get that many Albertans to
00:03:47.540 choose it. You know, this is something the movement has to look at. I'm seeing a lot of
00:03:51.480 hurt feelings rather than introspection among the movement right now. I really think there's
00:03:57.040 a solid base and I think a lot's been accomplished for the movement right now and if they can hold
00:04:01.540 it together this will still turn into something lasting a lot of the discussion we're seeing right
00:04:05.340 now too is frustrated federalists saying when they're hearing from some of us say well we're
00:04:08.760 not done uh say well this should be put to bed it's finished it's it's it's it's gone no it's
00:04:14.080 not even close uh you know it's it's going to go into a slumber for a while but this is a movement
00:04:18.680 that's not going anywhere it's a part of Alberta politics now yeah uh I want to go a little further
00:04:25.640 into that um the this you know when you fail at anything that you've tried to succeed in
00:04:33.700 the correct action is is you know not necessarily to give up obviously but it is at least incumbent
00:04:41.000 upon yourself to be introspective to figure out why you didn't succeed and maybe some of those
00:04:46.780 things are your fault and maybe some of those things are not your fault um you know many things
00:04:51.700 beyond the reach of the independence movement.
00:04:56.120 They had the entire establishment against it.
00:04:58.460 That's not necessarily its fault.
00:05:00.360 It had Elections Alberta tilting the field
00:05:02.320 with campaign finance law against it,
00:05:04.900 not applying it equally.
00:05:06.220 That's not its fault.
00:05:07.360 But some things very much are its fault.
00:05:09.780 The movement, by its decentralized nature, 1.00
00:05:13.380 allowed any asshole to come along 0.99
00:05:16.440 and declare himself the representative of the movement. 0.99
00:05:19.740 And there were, you know, some figures who maybe their heart was in the right place, but they did immense damage to the independence movement with the way they conducted themselves, the way they claimed to speak for the movement.
00:05:35.480 And the federalist side was only too happy to point at them and say, hey, look, there is their leaders.
00:05:41.380 um and and because there it was a decentralized it's not even a decentralized organization it's
00:05:49.400 a decentralized movement there really was no way to for for the reasonable rational and competent
00:05:55.560 people in the movement to say no that clown doesn't speak for us and and i and i think that
00:06:02.440 that was immensely damaging and i know uh when you know i say yesterday but also felt like last
00:06:08.180 night because i i was in the news room at 4 a.m i think you popped in at like 4 30 or 5 you know
00:06:14.060 dave and nigel were there i think before 6 we're all there wild hours so it's it's a blur but you
00:06:20.600 know i i i remember you cory you had you had pointed to the this and uh you know said that
00:06:28.880 perhaps the movement needs some more centralization maybe the hyper decentralized model of
00:06:34.980 everybody's a leader and everybody's a follower, maybe that doesn't work. If this movement is
00:06:42.220 going to have any kind of future going forward, it's going to have to establish some kind of
00:06:46.680 hierarchy with some kind of credibility about who speaks for it and who leads it.
00:06:53.000 Absolutely. I mean, and whether that comes in the form of a party, which is I think a lot of people
00:06:57.400 could be really dangerous in the political landscape in Alberta, or at least one kind of
00:07:03.480 dominant advocacy group that had a mechanism i mean for example the alberta prosperity project
00:07:08.760 they've done a lot of work and they were definitely the largest kid on the block for
00:07:12.200 the first part of the whole independence for a while and a while they to my knowledge never
00:07:17.320 really had and as you said a hierarchy or an elected structure even among them it was just
00:07:21.640 kind of people who suddenly popped up and were the spokespeople for it they weren't necessarily
00:07:25.720 selected by members there was no uh uh you know accreditation or affirmation by people as to
00:07:31.640 whether those were the spokespeople for the movement. And as it dispersed, it led to the
00:07:37.100 problems we see, particularly coming into a campaign period. So if we get into another time
00:07:41.640 like that, I think we need one organization, at least some sort of mechanism to put spokespeople,
00:07:48.740 maybe they still could be a bit decentralized, but they have to have some degree of having been
00:07:53.700 selected by the larger group to speak for it. So if you do get things coming off on the fringe,
00:07:58.380 you can point out, well, that's just, that's over there.
00:08:00.800 This is the people speaking generally for the movement here
00:08:03.020 because it was really difficult to try and campaign
00:08:05.980 when we get different voices from different directions.
00:08:08.500 Maybe.
00:08:09.560 Oh, sorry.
00:08:10.000 Sorry, we're going to get into the potential
00:08:12.340 for there being a bona fide independence party
00:08:15.680 from this separate from that.
00:08:16.700 We're going to get into that in the next segment.
00:08:18.780 But yeah, so Dave, go ahead.
00:08:20.660 I was just going to suggest to Corey,
00:08:22.620 maybe a organizing convention, not to form a party, 0.99
00:08:27.340 but to come up with standards and guidelines and because you had bozo eruptions for lack of a better
00:08:33.740 word by some of the leaders of so-called leaders of the in this movement that as you rightly say
00:08:39.580 did a lot of damage so you need to come out of it the the best thing you can do is go away for
00:08:44.940 a while reflect and then organize properly get a get a centralized organization with
00:08:51.340 a centralized spokesperson, a centralized leader who, A, returns phone calls, doesn't make bozo
00:08:58.700 election, bozo promises, doesn't, you know, it's not bombastic, but, you know, it just comes across
00:09:05.260 better. And that small thing will get more people on board.
00:09:09.820 All of which is to say to your first point, Corey, that that 25 percent is actually a little
00:09:17.020 on the low side there was probably a larger interest in what independence means but some
00:09:26.460 people quite a few people i would venture who would have been prepared to vote for it backed off
00:09:33.820 because of just the things that dave is talking about here do i really want to ride the trail
00:09:39.580 with this guy. What percentage of those 25% were on the, I just want to send a message,
00:09:48.340 and not real card-course supporters of... Well, it's a good question to ask, Dave,
00:09:52.900 and the reason it's a good question to ask is when you look at the other nine questions,
00:09:59.200 you may have only had 25% who said they were interested in separating, but you had twice
00:10:04.760 that and more who wanted serious constitutional reform yeah so let's get into that i i think you
00:10:12.840 know a lot of the the federalists right now in their victory lap they're trying to denigrate
00:10:19.480 the independence result as much as possible but you know which is you know whatever that's that's
00:10:23.680 fair game i guess for that side um but they're trying to say and it's real support is actually
00:10:29.020 less than that 24 25 percent most of them were just trying to send a message and i i think it's
00:10:34.260 quite the opposite actually because you had the other nine questions where people were that was
00:10:39.620 their mechanism to send a message uh i know people who you know i won't name names but some of uh you
00:10:47.680 guys would probably assume some of these people voted for independence they did not because they
00:10:53.620 were hearing what the federalist campaign was saying was saying hey don't vote to send a message
00:10:57.220 and they thought okay yeah you know maybe i'm not quite ready to vote for independence to go the
00:11:02.460 whole hog, but I've got four constitutional and five immigration questions where I can fire a
00:11:07.340 shot. I could fire a shot there and send a message on those issues. So I think by putting the nine 0.98
00:11:14.140 questions in the same referendum alongside the independence question, I think it actually
00:11:20.380 suppressed how well independence could do because there were nine other ways to send a message at
00:11:26.020 the same time. Yeah, you know, diluting the message, it's hard to say because, and that's
00:11:34.700 the sort of thing we have to think about and chew on as we go forward. I think with a question that
00:11:38.140 serious, we shouldn't have be faced with 10 questions on a ballot again, just the organizational
00:11:42.600 nightmare, you know, alone. And it was impossible to campaign even people concerned about two of
00:11:47.880 the questions of the 10 or something. How do you even segment those to try and make your case?
00:11:53.000 So in the future, that shouldn't happen.
00:11:54.640 But if it had been just question 10 all by itself, that would have turned into a de facto
00:12:00.480 independence question.
00:12:01.820 We can see how that debate would have gone.
00:12:03.420 As you said, it did offer some outs for sending a message.
00:12:06.000 And even though with the phrasing of question 10 as it was, that's where I modeled my campaign
00:12:10.200 to say, well, if it's going to be phrased like that, we might as well campaign to send
00:12:13.000 a message because it's non-binding.
00:12:15.400 But that would have been harder to do, as you said, because there wouldn't have been
00:12:20.100 those nine outs for people to get away from that send a message it's difficult to tell how people
00:12:25.020 would go on things but some might have framed it effectively at that time as I said to be
00:12:29.920 almost a binding vote if that's the question all by itself I these are the things we should dwell
00:12:35.240 on see what would be more effective in the future and the other thing to follow on that Corey is
00:12:39.780 kind of what the message is a reader pointed out to me this morning in a in private correspondence
00:12:47.200 There's a lot of people who are pro-independence, who also have guns, who also are deeply skeptical of the way things were handled during the COVID crisis.
00:12:59.020 And there's this sort of overlay of distrust in the federal government and any provincial government that is going to try and play ball too seriously with the federal government.
00:13:12.540 There's sort of a groupthink there, and it's probably larger than 25%.
00:13:19.440 So what actually is the message we're trying to send is don't mess with Albertans.
00:13:27.360 We believe in freedom.
00:13:29.140 We believe in certain rights.
00:13:31.840 We believe in what the Constitution allows to the provinces.
00:13:38.260 So I have a feeling it's got a little bit more to do.
00:13:42.520 It's not just oil pipelines and energy development.
00:13:46.400 There's more to it.
00:13:47.820 It's a head thing.
00:13:50.160 All right.
00:13:50.660 Well, let's turn this conversation towards where the movement is going next.
00:13:58.660 Alberta Premier Danielle Smith put out a video statement to members of her party today.
00:14:08.260 And the synopsis, you know, to paraphrase it, you know, I'd say she, you know, she said, OK, guys, it's over and we can all be one big happy family.
00:14:22.000 We're not going to purge people who supported independence.
00:14:27.340 But she she hasn't quite totally repudiated Jason Kenney's call for purging independent supporters.
00:14:34.900 um i guess we could read this a few different ways depends how charitably
00:14:39.740 charitable you want to be and what perspective you're coming from and how you view it
00:14:43.080 but she was saying that this is not going to be an independence party this is a party that's going
00:14:48.900 to be a provincial sovereigntist more or less you know it'll stand for more jurisdiction it'll
00:14:55.760 stand for alberta provincial rights and that kind of thing but it's not going to be an independence
00:15:00.260 party and if you can't accommodate yourself to it not being an independence party uh then you
00:15:05.680 should join a different party she didn't necessarily say we're going to kick you out
00:15:09.240 but there was some implications that there may be purity tests applied uh i mean it was just
00:15:15.100 yesterday or day before that uh the one mla who openly supported uh the option two in the
00:15:20.540 independence referendum jay stefan he announced he's not running again that might be an indication
00:15:25.120 of things to come um so but over half of ucp voters voted for independence here and probably
00:15:35.460 well over half of ucp members uh actively supported it this is potentially playing with
00:15:43.980 fire nigel but at the at the same time you know you've got a certain self-appointed leaders in
00:15:50.860 the independence movement calling for her head they've declared war on her first not her on them
00:15:55.300 um and at the same time she has a year from now almost to the date uh she has to face voters in
00:16:02.400 a general election the majority of which independent supporters have to admit are not
00:16:08.320 yet backing independence and they're not going to vote for a party that's explicitly pro-independence
00:16:12.600 at this time so uh first of all to go back to her statement to the entire province last night
00:16:20.180 I thought that that speech was measured and conciliatory to the people who are most likely to be offended by the very fact that she took a Federalist position.
00:16:31.480 I don't think there's really much that she could have said that she should have said that wasn't in the speech.
00:16:38.780 So, looking at whether she should have had more to say to Mr. Kenney this morning,
00:16:46.920 Again, there are people who still believe in Mr. Kenney, who she wants to vote for her in October of next year.
00:16:56.160 This, it would not have been a good time for her to go out and make strong statements alienating people who, in a year's time, might have settled down a little bit and be prepared to look at her and say,
00:17:10.660 well, there's things about Danielle Smith's leadership
00:17:14.880 that I did not like, but I certainly do not want the NDP.
00:17:20.780 And you can make that argument
00:17:22.940 as a frustrated independence advocate.
00:17:27.700 You may not, you know, you didn't get your independence vote,
00:17:31.860 but you would still prefer a conservative look
00:17:35.240 to your government, not an NDP look.
00:17:37.720 Or you can say, well, I think she should have been much more Federalist.
00:17:43.020 She should never have allowed the referendum. 0.99
00:17:46.120 Darn Daniel Smith, but darn Nahid Nenshi as well. 0.98
00:17:50.280 If I have to pick one, I'm going to go with Daniel Smith. 0.99
00:17:55.760 And I think one of the bigger problems that she's going to have with that group of people 1.00
00:18:01.000 is that women voters tend not to like conflict. 1.00
00:18:04.980 and so in any man woman household high likelihood that the man will be
00:18:13.440 supportive of Danielle Smith but for an entirely different set of reasons his
00:18:18.420 wife live-in girlfriend is not so sure about her so it doesn't behoove her it
00:18:26.100 doesn't make it's not a good look on her and she comes out strongly with a very
00:18:31.620 theoretical partisan university understanding of what's going on here
00:18:38.940 appealing to Edmund Burke and all the rest of you know the great philosophers
00:18:42.900 she has to she has to keep the temperature cool and those people who
00:18:50.160 don't like her will like the fact that the Carney is there smiling at her it
00:18:55.740 seems to reduce the tension of the conflict can't say I'm thrilled I don't
00:19:00.660 think, well, I'll let other people speak for themselves, but she is really constrained
00:19:07.100 about how vociferous she can be at the moment.
00:19:10.280 The next big test comes next month, November 27th, I believe.
00:19:14.800 It's going to be the largest political convention in Canadian history.
00:19:18.760 It just keeps getting bigger and bigger.
00:19:19.940 Bigger and bigger and bigger.
00:19:20.980 7,000 delegates in Calgary this year, thank goodness.
00:19:25.180 So what happens at that convention is going to be very interesting.
00:19:30.660 To the independents, as we know, Jeff Rathis called for open warfare against Daniel Smith.
00:19:38.180 Are his followers going to cause havoc?
00:19:42.500 She's not facing a leadership vote.
00:19:44.400 You mean both of them?
00:19:46.220 She's not facing a leadership vote at this convention. 0.97
00:19:50.120 But they could make a nuisance of themselves.
00:19:52.920 So, you know, she said today that she wasn't going to sign the nomination papers for anybody
00:19:58.960 who wasn't 100% on board with the UCP's mandate now.
00:20:05.360 So it may be interesting to see if other people like Jason Steffen and other MLAs also walk
00:20:12.760 out the door.
00:20:13.760 So, you know, you say that there are individuals who declared open warfare on her.
00:20:17.820 Well, that's their prerequisite.
00:20:19.860 They can do that if they want.
00:20:21.880 what is the result that they will achieve if they are successful just a fractured party and another
00:20:28.040 ndp government i i mean to me well i want i want to go to cory on this um i mean there's going to
00:20:35.760 be certain irascible individuals like jeff wrath who are just going to be angry at smith they've
00:20:42.460 been angry at smith for a very long time there's no way to win him over i don't think she should
00:20:47.720 try in that case but smith's statement does open the door to a major split in the party now
00:20:56.220 uh my advice to some of her senior officials uh before the vote came in was that if the
00:21:01.780 independent side loses as polls indicated it was um she should directly repudiate kenny's call
00:21:08.680 to purge independence supporters she does not appear to have done that she's saying you can
00:21:15.000 stay, but you've got to more or less shut up about it now. And the movement has, you know,
00:21:20.520 with exceptions, as I've said, been content to stay in the UCP, and not necessarily require the
00:21:28.340 UCP to be an explicitly independence party, but for the UCP to at least facilitate this.
00:21:34.520 And Smith is right, there should not be another independence referendum in, you know, in the short
00:21:40.160 or even perhaps medium term, the winning conditions are not yet there. But there's,
00:21:44.300 She's saying that you guys need to totally drop it.
00:21:46.160 It's never happening again as long as I am the leader of the UCP and the Premier.
00:21:52.360 Is she opening the door here for a major legitimate split in the party?
00:21:58.880 Because if she's saying everybody who actively wants to pursue independence should go see the door,
00:22:06.180 well, that's over half of her voters.
00:22:09.500 It's a gamble.
00:22:10.640 and I guess you've got to be careful on how much you want to inflame them.
00:22:14.580 I think there'll be safety in numbers at the AGM, for example.
00:22:16.900 As I said, leadership isn't on the table.
00:22:18.500 There might be some hecklers and things,
00:22:19.940 but when you have 7,000 people and it's not on the agenda,
00:22:23.000 I don't think they're going to accomplish too, too much,
00:22:25.100 except for maybe the odd time taking an open mic,
00:22:27.020 as we saw in Edmonton and kind of disrupting some things.
00:22:29.880 But if they're really feeling alienated,
00:22:31.700 there's two risks I think she's taking.
00:22:34.880 One is that they go out the door and start another party,
00:22:37.780 which in that period of time and looking at the people who would probably be leading it,
00:22:43.380 I don't think it would be one that would be taking a bunch of seats,
00:22:45.680 but in areas like Edmonton and Calgary, if you look at the math,
00:22:48.100 if they take 5%, 10%, it'll be plenty to change the entire political landscape.
00:22:52.920 Or the other part is if they focus on those constituencies to push things into a leadership race.
00:22:58.640 We've got to remember that's a surgical approach rather than going at the AGM to try and move 7,000 people.
00:23:04.680 That's taking over constituency boards that often actually only have 12 or 20 or 30 active people on them.
00:23:10.460 That's how Jason Kenney exposed his flank and ended up facing a leadership review early in his term.
00:23:17.500 That could potentially happen to Premier Smith.
00:23:20.000 It's a lot harder to shore up 87 little organizations than it is a party as a whole.
00:23:25.780 So I know polling-wise, I think she knows that, again, three-quarters of Albertans said they aren't ready to entertain that right now.
00:23:31.860 she doesn't want to go into a general election with that constantly hanging over her head.
00:23:35.700 She wants to turn the page so she can focus on other policy items. It makes sense.
00:23:40.020 But at the same time, if she turns this into a big battle that her opponents would love to see 0.95
00:23:44.520 inflamed further, it will keep the independence issue on the table for the next six months or a 0.94
00:23:48.740 year and could really cause some headaches. She's in a terribly tough spot, but I think she might 0.51
00:23:53.000 be overcorrecting a bit when she's looking at the purge of those members. I mean, she should still
00:23:57.880 say, you know, be welcoming within the party, but just saying it's not on the policy agenda right
00:24:01.820 now, but you're still with us. Please be with us. Trying to invite people kind of towards the door.
00:24:06.400 I think it'd be dangerous. You know, I, I have a strong sense that everybody doesn't want to talk
00:24:12.340 about this anymore. People are pretty tired. People are tired of the whole thing and she is
00:24:19.200 probably going to be safe with that audience who just want to turn the page on it until, I mean,
00:24:26.080 there are some folks who will never give up, and that's their right. But the general population
00:24:33.940 has had enough. We've had the vote. We know what it was. We know what the implications are.
00:24:39.960 And Smith is probably on sound stage here if she is saying, look, guys, we're done with this for
00:24:47.660 a while. Not forever, maybe, but not on my watch. Let's talk about other things.
00:24:52.440 Okay, well, that's probably sound logic if we're talking the entire public. Three quarters voted for Remain. Two thirds of that, though, is roughly NDP supporters. Only one third of that is UCP supporters at most.
00:25:10.480 Over half of UCP voters voted for independence,
00:25:13.460 and that number is a lot higher among the members.
00:25:15.880 And Smith is acutely aware of history
00:25:17.980 of how conservatives tend to lose power in Alberta.
00:25:21.040 It's not normally in general elections.
00:25:23.920 It's internal revolt, and normally from the populist right.
00:25:29.060 And she, you know, so I do think most Albertans
00:25:32.020 don't want to talk about this right now.
00:25:33.800 Probably even a majority of people who voted for independence
00:25:36.160 are happy to, maybe not happy to, but content to,
00:25:39.680 Let this lay for a while and think about where things are going to go.
00:25:43.940 But within the party, this is an active and motivated and aggressive cohort.
00:25:50.240 The cohort is probably the wrong term.
00:25:52.240 It's probably a majority of the kind of people who are going to show up to party conventions here.
00:25:57.380 I think she's exposed a flank that while this might be the safest and probably correct political position for her to take with the general public, it's not with party members.
00:26:09.680 And they might decide, well, we're under no obligation to show ourselves the door.
00:26:16.620 We're the majority here.
00:26:18.620 Perhaps you go.
00:26:20.640 I think that's the danger she's opened herself up to here, and as Corey put it, overcorrected.
00:26:27.760 Well, it could be that way, Derek.
00:26:29.280 I mean, we're going to see soon enough, I suppose.
00:26:31.320 But when I look at her choices, it's hard to make a strong case that she should have done something very different from just saying to the general membership, look, it's all forgiven.
00:26:45.240 If you were in favor of separation, that's fine.
00:26:48.880 You had your right to do that.
00:26:51.220 You're welcome to stay.
00:26:53.060 But just let's talk about something else.
00:26:54.920 So if you've got diehards who are prepared to keep the thing boiling, well, I'm not sure what I would advise for those people.
00:27:05.100 Do you want to be run by them or do you want to at least appeal to the rest of the party which is ready to talk about other things like pipelines and how to get them, whether Mr. Carney is really on our side or not? 0.89
00:27:22.020 Okay, well, yeah, we will see.
00:27:24.920 now we're never going to stop being interesting but you know who's gotten interesting in the last
00:27:30.900 few years finally is british columbia has joined club crazy uh for the club of interesting
00:27:37.660 provinces for politics so uh alex has been sitting there patiently as you know the uh
00:27:43.700 the old alberta boys club here has been uh chortling on uh but we're gonna give the floor
00:27:49.240 to to you alex alex we're all watching with bated breath uh as uh i don't know if any other province
00:27:56.360 does elections on weekends um i mean and it's not without its merits but uh yeah so this saturday
00:28:02.420 british colombians vote uh polls are showing the conservatives have the edge some show a pretty
00:28:10.180 big edge some are showing a smaller one but uh what are you expecting to happen this saturday
00:28:15.700 is bc votes yeah so saturday is the final voting day the polls are showing the bc conservatives
00:28:23.520 ahead but in some cases only by the margin of error so i'm actually less optimistic than most
00:28:30.340 right of center individuals in british columbia i think that it's going to be a lot closer than
00:28:35.120 the polls are maybe suggesting at this point do you want to expand on that at all yeah yeah no
00:28:41.780 I'd be happy to. So if I had to give a number, I would say I'm expecting the BC Conservatives to win 45 to 47 seats.
00:28:51.280 I'm expecting the NDP to be up in the 40s as well.
00:28:54.900 And a good possibility that the Green Party or even a one center BC seat could be the balance of power.
00:29:03.280 So it's that which would actually be a pretty close replication of what we have now in the legislature.
00:29:09.060 But not looking good for the Greens.
00:29:11.780 uh no the greens actually i should i should correct myself i could see the greens picking
00:29:15.620 up two or three seats they have two now um so they're they're actually looking much better in
00:29:20.740 the polls and they've had a bit of a search since the leaders debate as well well that's got to be
00:29:25.860 good for the conservatives it seems to me that you had a story earlier last week about mr eby
00:29:32.180 appealing to the greens to vote with him and shore up his support so if they actually are going off
00:29:39.220 and gathering support of their own,
00:29:41.540 that's not going to be at the expense of the Conservatives.
00:29:44.400 Yeah, absolutely. 0.70
00:29:45.680 The Greens really only take votes from the BC NDP,
00:29:48.660 so that vote split on the left is a huge advantage to the BC Conservatives.
00:29:52.960 However, there is a bit of a vote split threat on the right as well with 1BC,
00:29:57.140 and in particular, in some significant swing ridings,
00:30:01.400 I think about the Okanagan.
00:30:03.200 So Kelowna Center, the Conservatives won in the last election by only 40 votes.
00:30:07.820 They have a 1BC candidate running there, and Penticton Summerland as well.
00:30:12.260 It went by, I think, 400 votes in the last election, and Warren Hamm is running there.
00:30:17.240 I was actually there just a few weeks ago, and I saw far more 1BC signs than either Conservative or NDP signs, which really surprised me.
00:30:26.680 Go ahead, Dave.
00:30:28.600 I was going to say you've also got the new Green Party mayor of Vancouver who has come out in support of the Green Party leader.
00:30:37.820 that's right and it's really interesting the municipal elections happening right before
00:30:42.060 the provincial elections it would behoove me to try to speculate on what maps over
00:30:48.140 or if voters are signaling their vote intention with the provincial election with the decisions
00:30:53.500 they made in the civic election but i have seen some speculation that i think holds some water
00:30:59.020 that vancouver voters because civic voters tend to be a little bit older and a little
00:31:03.980 little bit more politically sophisticated, that they may have been hedging their bets
00:31:07.380 and voting for a more progressive Vancouver mayor in anticipation of also voting for and getting
00:31:14.100 a conservative provincial government. But then in Surrey, of course, it went the other way,
00:31:18.520 where they picked a familiar face in Doug Callum. So it's really hard to say, you know,
00:31:23.160 if people are voting strategically in both elections, or if it's, you know, just a matter
00:31:28.220 of coincidence. So Alex, if you're inclined to vote for a conservative candidate and you have
00:31:33.920 1BC and you have the BC Conservatives, what are the things that are going to help you make your
00:31:39.080 mind up? Which? Well, I know with a lot of thinly loyalists, which is what I would call them,
00:31:47.200 and that would be individuals who are loyal to the now ex-leader of the BC Conservative Party,
00:31:51.940 they're probably going to vote for the 1BC candidate regardless of who they are.
00:31:55.340 But most individuals who are right of center, in my opinion, would be wise to pick the BC Conservatives because one BC's likelihood of governing is zero. And the likelihood of them winning any individual seat is also fairly low. Even in Dallas Brody's seat in Vancouver, Kilchenna, I don't foresee her getting reelected.
00:32:15.660 So, how's the party been doing? I mean, it's interesting to see how unity can come from necessity though, right? Like this was kind of mashed together. I mean, everything was in disarray. There was factions bouncing all over and people, and it was quite remarkable. I think quite a good accomplishment to manage to pull it together and into a cohesive party going into an election.
00:32:38.200 But they are going in, held together with bailing, twine, necessity, and prayers.
00:32:43.440 Obviously, it looks like they'll make it to Saturday without exploding.
00:32:46.680 But do you think this party is going to be able to sustain after the election?
00:32:50.900 You know, I know I'm asking you to look ahead, but I mean, it also depends on whether they win or lose.
00:32:55.060 But they've had an interim leader. He's done very, very well.
00:32:58.000 But still, he would have to face a leadership review or race at some point and things like that.
00:33:03.140 Are they just keeping the heads down campaigning right now and not talking about such things?
00:33:07.140 Yeah, I think that's the question of all questions, because it really is the same caucus that was exploding only a couple of months ago.
00:33:14.820 And a week feels like a lifetime in B.C. politics right now, so it's easy to forget that.
00:33:19.440 But for those of us who are paying very close attention, it's also hard to forget that.
00:33:25.360 And I don't think that it is beyond the bounds of believability that this party could implode, even if it's in a position of being in government.
00:33:33.260 um in my opinion it seems like if you go back looking not only to the finley leadership but
00:33:39.340 also to the rustad leadership before it this party has a significant unity problem and some
00:33:45.800 individuals within the party i won't name names but it seems like they they maybe have difficulty
00:33:49.880 playing well with others and then you also have the ideological issues not entirely unlike the
00:33:55.400 ones you just described with the ucp obviously it's not over the the issue of independence
00:34:01.300 But on specific social issues and political wedge issues, there's still a lack of unity amongst the BC Conservatives.
00:34:10.460 And I think that that's a case with Canadian Conservatives pretty much everywhere, but especially pronounced with this group.
00:34:17.720 Alex, is it just me or is David Eby looking glummer by the day?
00:34:23.420 Oh, yeah.
00:34:23.860 When he attacked Lord Dirksen on his patriotism after the Wainwright disaster,
00:34:31.020 I mean, that was just utter desperation, surely. 0.98
00:34:34.980 Oh, yeah, he's a dead man walking.
00:34:37.440 And he kind of reminds me, I don't know, that Simpsons meme
00:34:39.820 where Sideshow Bob, every time he takes a step,
00:34:42.160 you know, a right comes up and hits him in the face.
00:34:46.420 You know, like every decision he's made through this whole campaign
00:34:51.740 has managed to backfire.
00:34:52.940 Yeah, it's honestly kind of hilarious. I mean, the Wainwright thing is obviously a horrific tragedy, but every single step that Evie has taken has been a self-goal, as they like to say.
00:35:07.120 My favorite one was the one at the beginning when he used the firebreak analogy to describe his justification for the whole election, which was we're building a firebreak against Donald Trump.
00:35:17.460 And then it turned out that Lauren Dirksen actually put out fires in firebreaks.
00:35:22.560 You know, and the video came out.
00:35:24.380 Everybody loved him at that point.
00:35:26.900 And it's really quite shocking, too, because the BCNDP war room had all the time in the world to prepare for this.
00:35:32.140 they didn't even end up putting together a full slate, which is the strangest thing when you were
00:35:37.940 the ones calling a snap election. So I think that this election has really put on display
00:35:45.640 the incompetence of the BC NDP political machine generally. It kind of explains why we have this
00:35:52.140 giant deficit, worsening services. I mean, it's the old saying, do not attribute malice where
00:35:57.980 incompetence will suffice and this is an incredibly incompetent group and this election has really
00:36:03.100 demonstrated that quite nicely so if you fear for the competence of the incoming conservatives
00:36:08.860 because let's face them they have given us lots of news headlines in the last year you may not
00:36:15.020 know what you're going to get from them but you do know what you're going to get from the ndp
00:36:20.140 and you don't want it you want no more of it that's right yeah it's it's you're actually voting
00:36:25.740 for the devil you don't know
00:36:27.060 over the devil you do know,
00:36:29.400 because the devil you do know 0.97
00:36:30.560 is just so damn devilish. 0.92
00:36:33.360 So Alex, campaigns, war rooms, 0.51
00:36:37.640 their main goal is normally
00:36:39.420 to try and frame
00:36:40.240 what is the ballot box question,
00:36:42.100 and the different sides
00:36:43.000 would try to define
00:36:44.140 the ballot box question
00:36:45.140 to their advantage.
00:36:47.020 What do you think,
00:36:49.480 you're in the final strokes now,
00:36:52.060 what is the generally agreed upon
00:36:54.160 ballot box question
00:36:55.500 uh in bc right now oh it's the same one everywhere in the world affordability you know it's the same
00:37:01.740 ballot box question in the u.s midterms um it is here and that that was actually reflected well in
00:37:08.140 the main street poll that just came out i think 54 percent of respondents said affordability was
00:37:12.900 the number one issue which is always strange in a provincial election because you know a premier
00:37:17.580 only has so much control over the price of gas and groceries and that's another one that david
00:37:22.180 Phoebe has tried to, I don't even know what you would say.
00:37:26.580 He's attacking the gas providers or the gas companies,
00:37:30.300 even though he promoted LNG too,
00:37:32.120 as one of the greatest mega projects in Canadian history.
00:37:35.040 And he also attacked Jimmy Patterson and Save on Foods,
00:37:38.680 which is one of the very few BC based grocery chain companies.
00:37:43.780 And he said he was going to introduce price caps on groceries.
00:37:48.020 So it's, which everybody knows is just a terrible thing.
00:37:51.720 clips on groceries oh yeah he's got my mom dummy it turned into a real exactly it turned into kind
00:37:58.480 of an avi lewis style far left political campaign which was a losing battle for him because emily
00:38:04.700 lowen and the greens already had that real estate staked out right they had already so evie moving
00:38:11.340 further to the left i think mostly pushed anybody who is a moderate to the conservative side and
00:38:17.340 anybody who was a radical leftist and an NDP loyalist over to the green side because the
00:38:21.740 greens are just doing it way harder like they're running a good honest Marxist-Leninist campaign
00:38:26.780 ah they're they're OG so as you said though I mean he's a dead man walking I mean even if he 0.95
00:38:34.620 pulls off and squeaks through this and they hang on to again you know a slim majority we have a
00:38:39.000 stalemate they're back where they were I mean he's going to be replaced you'd imagine I mean
00:38:43.360 the left are pretty good for hanging on to leaders no matter what but i mean he's he's got to have
00:38:47.700 crossed enough lines they they understand they need somebody new there yeah so my sources on
00:38:53.360 the ndp side tell me that his days are numbered as the leader regardless of what happens in the
00:38:57.960 election interestingly enough he had a presser today uh it was just a couple minutes ago really
00:39:03.380 and they asked him if he intended to stay on his leader if he loses the election or walks away with
00:39:08.560 same number of seats and he did not answer directly well of course no no politician would
00:39:14.560 answer that honestly uh if he loses i i think he he resigns on election night if he wins you know
00:39:21.840 he'll probably try to hang on for a while and see you know if the party houses or not but uh
00:39:26.240 yeah i don't imagine him uh to stay on uh for more than five minutes if he loses on election night
00:39:33.360 okay well uh one of the interesting things i should just add about this election is that he
00:39:39.460 has never won a leadership race he was um made leader after the passing of john horgan
00:39:45.600 lauren dirksen has never won a leadership oh yeah they disqualified his opponent right
00:39:50.240 uh no no he was um i forget what the word what he was um acclaimed acclaimed yeah yeah because
00:39:56.560 they he was acclaimed because they disqualified his opponent there was a there was a like a left
00:40:00.840 populist person who wanted to run and they disqualified her oh okay yeah no that was a
00:40:05.700 little bit before my time i was doing other things so i wasn't watching it that close yeah so there
00:40:09.160 we go we have we have both leaders of both parties have never won an honest to god leadership
00:40:13.580 bc has never had a leadership race one bc has never had a leadership race yeah now in the case
00:40:19.400 of the conservatives here i don't think that's really their fault in this particular circumstance
00:40:22.640 but yeah it's a good point to make okay well we're gonna put a pin in bc there uh and turn to
00:40:29.500 our parting shots. We'll give
00:40:31.340 the first one to Dave.
00:40:33.200 I just want to wish my fellow Brit
00:40:35.240 Nigel a happy Trafalgar Day.
00:40:38.260 You bet.
00:40:39.360 1805. And I just want to, it's an
00:40:41.480 internal thing, but I want to throw our
00:40:43.200 operations manager, Josh Andrus,
00:40:45.940 under the bus.
00:40:47.260 He was in charge of ordering breakfast
00:40:49.240 from McDonald's yesterday.
00:40:51.080 And he did not order
00:40:53.320 hash browns.
00:40:54.940 What kind of 1.00
00:40:57.080 crap is that? 1.00
00:40:58.800 He had wraps, breakfast wraps, and he had bacon McMuffins, sausage McMuffins, 0.99
00:41:04.060 but no regular egg McMuffins, the ones with the ham.
00:41:07.600 That's my go-to.
00:41:09.440 And no hash browns. 0.98
00:41:10.620 What the hell, Josh? 0.99
00:41:13.960 Outrageous. 0.96
00:41:14.660 Well, as they said on Trafalgar Day, England expects every man to do his duty,
00:41:17.980 and Dave expects Josh to order egg McMuffins and hash browns properly
00:41:22.520 when the time is appropriate.
00:41:24.700 Absolutely.
00:41:25.120 I was just reflecting on the fact that 30-odd years ago, when we had the last go-round with
00:41:32.360 Quebec, there was a lot of suggestion in Western Canada that we should reach out to Quebec
00:41:39.700 personally. Schools should write to schools, and people should write to people who plead
00:41:45.360 with them to vote to stay in Canada. I think some people did participate in that kind of
00:41:52.000 action and it was all played up at the time i don't recall anybody any kind of a campaign in
00:41:57.760 ontario or quebec reaching out to alberta to please stay please vote to stay so you know
00:42:06.240 you've got your work cut out for you i don't know i don't i don't think maybe it's not your work if
00:42:11.120 they'd reached out and plead us to stay i'm not sure if it would have helped so many but yeah uh
00:42:15.760 corey i just want to remind people i guess and now that we're past kind of the alberta thing and
00:42:20.320 And look at the federal scene.
00:42:21.660 The more things change, the more they stay the same.
00:42:23.520 I just looked at that story.
00:42:24.880 While people are struggling, as Alex said, with affordability and we're worried about our youth finding housing and being able to afford down payment,
00:42:30.620 Mark Carney has taken $8 million of our tax dollars and given it to the Dominican Republic for housing.
00:42:36.000 So keep paying those taxes.
00:42:38.020 Keep watching that debt grow and keep looking at an unaffordable world.
00:42:41.100 This is the status quo you guys have selected.
00:42:44.940 And Alex, parting shot for you. 0.98
00:42:47.400 i'd like to throw that judge uh the bc supreme court judge um justice brown which is a ridiculous 1.00
00:42:54.300 name given the circumstances um i'd like to throw her under the bus for declaring 25 years with no 0.74
00:43:00.220 chance of parole unconstitutional in the case of the three indian nationals who suffocated that
00:43:05.040 elderly couple so i see what you did there alex that was good i see what you did wasn't very
00:43:16.840 subtle um okay uh real quick i can maybe john can uh add the graphics for this a story from
00:43:27.600 the western standards david veichnik the top 10 uh constituencies with the most support for
00:43:34.100 independence number one was rimby rocky mountain house sundry 51 percent there number two i love
00:43:40.320 the name of this this is where i want to go this is uh todd lowen's constituency central peace
00:43:45.300 notley voted 51 for independence and then that constituency gets its name from uh i forget his
00:43:54.600 first name but uh rachel notley's father garden grant notley that's it who was the leader of the
00:44:00.520 ndp uh back when we had horses and buggies and whatnot but that he's from that area and so the
00:44:06.880 constituency named central peace notley and so i just wanted to point out that notley voted for
00:44:12.540 independence so uh everybody should check that article out uh if your area falls within it
00:44:19.940 might give you it might bolster your spirits if you voted for independence but didn't winning
00:44:25.220 go take a look how your own constituency voted all right dave nigel gory and alex thank you
00:44:31.620 very much and thank you john running things in production and all of you who have joined us
00:44:36.540 today on the pipeline remember if you're not yet a subscriber go to western standard.news click on
00:44:41.360 subscribe. It's $10 a month or $100 a year for unlimited access to all Western Standard content.
00:44:46.900 Thank you very much for joining us today, and God bless.
00:45:11.360 We'll be right back.