00:00:00.000The New Democrats' win in Calgary-Shaw has triggered an immediate debate over what went wrong for Danielle Smith and the United Conservative Party.
00:00:09.080Calgary-Shaw was not supposed to be an NDP seat.
00:00:12.680In the last election, then-MLA Rebecca Schultz won it handily.
00:00:17.360On Monday, NDP candidate Kyle Campbell defeated UCP candidate Mike Derry 7,461 votes to 6,879 in the unofficial count,
00:00:28.760flipping a South Calgary constituency that has been held by conservative parties for decades.
00:00:34.880There is a lazy interpretation of the results,
00:00:38.720a line of thinking that suggests that the Smith government faltered purely
00:00:42.380because the premier catered to fringe independence advocates.
00:00:47.880This, in turn, drove pragmatic center-right voters to abstain or split off and vote progressive Tory,
00:00:54.600handing the new Democrats an unexpected victory in a reliably right-leaning riding.
00:01:01.320That is exactly former Premier Jason Kenney's way of thinking,
00:01:05.260one that I have no doubt dominates the mindset of nearly every senior government communications official in the Alberta legislature,
00:01:13.040and it certainly fits with a fired politician whose single-minded mission to protect Canada from what he calls mouth-breathing separatists
00:01:20.840has led him to devote far more energy to campaigning alongside former NDP Premier Rachel Notley
00:01:26.680and current Liberal MP Corey Hogan than to any other endeavor.
00:01:32.520The fact that he has the gall to attack the government position while literally teaming up with the opposition
00:01:37.460should make his interpretation completely invalid,
00:01:41.100not to mention the fact that it's an interpretation that completely misses the mark.1.00
00:01:45.720Smith's problem is that she has positioned herself in a political middle0.50
00:01:49.960that is becoming far too narrow to hold the United Conservative Coalition together.
00:01:54.720On one side are centrist progressive Conservatives and committed Canadian Federalists
00:01:59.160who are deeply uncomfortable with Alberta independence.
00:02:02.720On the other are wild-rose reform and increasingly independence-minded Conservatives
00:02:07.440who believe that the existing Canadian Federation has repeatedly failed to accommodate
00:02:12.380Alberta's economic and political interests.
00:02:16.060Smith is attempting to stand between them.
00:02:18.980The difficulty is that neither side has much reason to be completely satisfied
00:02:24.920Federalist conservatives see a government that is prepared to facilitate an independence referendum
00:02:30.080And worry that the NDP is legitimizing the breakup of the country
00:02:33.900Independence-minded conservatives hear Smith repeatedly insist that she wants Alberta to remain in Canada
00:02:40.000While watching Ottawa retain enormous influence over questions they consider fundamental to Alberta's economic future
00:03:57.320It appears that the United Conservative Party as a whole has fallen victim to a serious case of dome disease.0.86
00:04:04.460The real dividing line in Alberta politics isn't necessarily between Federalists and Separatists.
00:04:11.100It is increasingly between people who believe Alberta can secure enough power within Confederation to govern itself meaningfully,
00:04:19.500and people who have concluded that it cannot.
00:04:22.820However, there is an obvious problem with simply telling Albertans that the answer is greater provincial autonomy.
00:04:29.220We've been trying that for more than 120 years.
00:04:32.680Alberta entered Confederation in 1905 without even possessing the same control over its natural resources enjoyed by the original provinces.
00:04:41.180Ottawa retained the crown lands, mines, minerals, and royalties within the new province.
00:04:46.040Alberta governments objected almost immediately.
00:04:49.760It took another quarter of a century of negotiations before the Natural Resources Transfer Agreement
00:04:54.740finally transferred those resources to Alberta in 1930.
00:04:58.540The agreement itself explicitly said that Alberta was being placed on an equal footing
00:05:02.900with the other provinces in the administration and control of its natural resources.
00:05:07.060For virtually the entire history of this province, Alberta has found itself arguing that the Federation gives Ottawa too much control over decisions fundamental to Alberta's economic future
00:05:19.100Natural resources was just the original fight
00:05:23.260Later came battles over energy policy, taxation, federal spending, representation, equalization, environmental regulation, and the constitutional balance itself
00:07:26.960Federalism is supposed to permit dramatically different regions of a very large country
00:07:31.520to govern themselves in substantial areas while sharing a national government for genuinely national purposes.
00:07:39.160This creates political room for Alberta to be Alberta, for Quebec to be Quebec,
00:07:43.920and for Newfoundland and Labrador to be Newfoundland and Labrador without requiring any of them to become independent countries.
00:07:50.980When that arrangement functions properly, independence has considerably less oxygen.
00:07:57.320But Alberta's history also explains why a growing number of people have become skeptical that simply invoking federalism will solve the problem.
00:08:05.460They have heard versions of that argument before, for more than a century.
00:08:12.300Most Alberta Federalists do not want their province to become politically subordinate to Ottawa,
00:08:17.760and most Alberta independence supporters did not begin with some abstract desire
00:08:23.060to create an international border at Lloydminster.
00:08:27.380Remaining in Canada is not by itself a political program capable of satisfying voters
00:08:32.740who believe the status quo of federation gives Alberta insufficient control over its own affairs.
00:08:39.980At the same time, simply allowing the independence question to remain alive
00:08:43.820does little to reassure Federalist Conservatives who want to know where the government intends to take the province.
00:08:50.480That leaves Smith vulnerable from both directions.
00:08:54.340The temptation after Calgary Shaw will be to include that Smith needs to move towards the political center.
00:09:00.540However, my message to political decision makers in Edmonton is this.
00:09:04.720A political coalition cannot survive indefinitely by defining itself merely as the halfway point between two dissatisfied groups.
00:09:14.980The better question should be what those groups actually have in common.
00:09:20.760I think the answer is considerably more obvious than it appears, so obvious that it should be smacking the Premier's office in the face.
00:09:28.640Both sides want Alberta to possess meaningful control over Alberta.
00:09:33.200The disagreement is over whether that can still be achieved inside Canada.
00:09:39.340That creates political space between unconditional acceptance of the status quo and immediate independence.
00:09:45.860But it is not enough to simply promise another round of negotiations with Ottawa.
00:09:51.060After 120 years, Albertans are entitled to ask what would actually be different this time.
00:09:59.540A clearer division between what belongs to Ottawa and what belongs to Edmonton.
00:10:06.280A legitimate willingness to defend provincial jurisdiction when Ottawa intrudes upon it.
00:10:13.300Tangible results rather than another declaration that Alberta deserves a better deal.
00:10:19.800If Alberta possessed enough authority within Confederation that Albertans genuinely believed they controlled their own economic and political destiny,
00:10:28.540much of the independence movement would lose its reason for existing.
00:10:34.900Daniel Smith's challenge is not merely keeping Federalists happy
00:10:38.440while preventing separatists from leaving the UCP.
00:10:41.920It's giving both groups a reason to believe
00:10:44.600that the same political project can deliver what they ultimately want.
00:10:51.280A strong Alberta with meaningful control over its own affairs.