Western Standard - October 15, 2024


Canada Cannot Be Fixed

Topics
Mentioned
Weapons, Stolen Property at Reoccupied Bridge Encampment Refocusing primary health care in Alberta

Episode Stats


Length

16 minutes

Words per minute

227.51

Word count

3,767

Sentence count

240

Harmful content

Hate speech

3

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of the podcast, I am joined by two of my good friends, Dr. Michael Brown and Dr. Ted Byfield, to discuss their new book, "Time to Leave: The Case for Alberta Separating from Canada."

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Thanks for coming on to join me today, Michael.
00:00:02.480 Thanks for having me, Corey. Can you hear me?
00:00:04.260 I do, yes. You're coming in nice and clear.
00:00:06.680 Okay, great, because I didn't know if I needed a headset.
00:00:09.560 No, no, you're coming in good.
00:00:11.260 So yeah, I'll just start with that.
00:00:12.600 You know, I've got your books in here as well.
00:00:14.780 This is time to leave. Canada cannot be fixed.
00:00:17.680 And as I was saying, with the gridlock going on in Parliament right now,
00:00:20.800 kind of shows a little bit of that with the system being broken,
00:00:23.340 you know, not just the policies necessarily.
00:00:27.240 And your other book, I mean, this is a really nice look,
00:00:29.160 and I got to give them back to Nigel now.
00:00:30.420 He lent them to me so I could read them.
00:00:31.740 But Canada, Standing on Guard for the, a really nice looking book.
00:00:35.680 And it's your 18th anniversary of this one.
00:00:38.380 So both interesting reads.
00:00:41.540 So with the time to leave, I mean, you've written, I'll let you explain it.
00:00:45.340 You've written on independence and sort of implied that it's time to leave for a while anyways.
00:00:49.620 What's new in this one to make the case a little better to people?
00:00:54.800 Yeah, well, I wrote my book, No Other Option in 2021,
00:00:58.020 as to present my case for independence.
00:01:00.480 I got written a history of the Alberta independence movement in 2009 called Alberta Separatism Then and Now.
00:01:05.400 But that wasn't an advocacy book so much, at least not explicitly, more subtly.
00:01:09.260 So in 2021, I wrote No Other Option to make the explicit case for Alberta independence.
00:01:13.780 And I found a lot of people were sympathetic.
00:01:15.780 But so many people would say to me, you know, Alberta should become independent.
00:01:18.900 But first, we need to try to reform Canada.
00:01:21.540 And after we've tried to reform Canada, if that doesn't work, then we'll try to become independent.
00:01:27.080 But for me, that was a frustrating argument because so much of our history for the last 40 or 50 years
00:01:32.860 has showed how we have tried to reform Canada.
00:01:35.920 And it didn't work.
00:01:36.900 And we've tried everything reasonable so far.
00:01:39.360 And so, you know, I wasn't expecting to write another book advocating Alberta independence.
00:01:43.500 But I really had to counter the argument that we still need to try to reform Canada
00:01:48.320 because there are many things I talk about in Time to Leave in more detail than in No Other Option
00:01:52.900 that show we've tried to reform Canada.
00:01:55.280 And like the two biggest ways in which we tried to do that was, you know, number one, the Reform Party
00:02:01.540 and number two, Senate reform.
00:02:03.440 And we started on Senate reform, you know, in the late by late 1970s.
00:02:06.460 So there are things we worked on for that many good Albertans worked on for many, many years.
00:02:11.200 And they didn't, they were not successful.
00:02:13.240 And so I'm saying, you know, we have tried to reform Canada.
00:02:15.700 And since none of these efforts we've tried over the decades have worked,
00:02:19.760 we really have to go now for the independence referendum.
00:02:22.620 That's the only thing we have left that we haven't tried.
00:02:24.380 And, you know, when I talk about Senate reform and the Reform Party,
00:02:27.620 these people did the best.
00:02:28.920 Like, it's not a matter of we can do these again and do better.
00:02:31.620 We can't.
00:02:32.200 We had the very best people, you know, in the Reform Party and advocating Senate reform.
00:02:36.340 And if our very best people cannot achieve it, you know, doing their very best,
00:02:40.580 then, you know, those are not viable options for us.
00:02:43.040 And as you mentioned earlier, you know, it's a system that's broken.
00:02:46.340 And Central Canada benefits from the system, so they do not want it reformed.
00:02:50.060 And so our only, the only thing we have left now is the independence referendum.
00:02:53.240 And so Time to Leave is different from No Other Option in the sense that it really focuses
00:02:58.160 specifically on, you know, showing how we've tried so many things that haven't worked.
00:03:02.920 That's kind of the main theme of the book.
00:03:04.540 And so, you know, all these books cover the same time period in a sense,
00:03:08.240 because, you know, from the 1970s up until now.
00:03:11.200 But they're not covering, they're using, there's different information.
00:03:15.580 So you're not, if you buy one of the, two of the books, you're not getting the duplicated
00:03:18.940 information that way.
00:03:20.560 No, and I understood that, you know, in reading it, but I figured it best for you to explain
00:03:24.580 that so people don't realize you didn't just slap a new cover on an old book and sell it
00:03:28.460 again.
00:03:28.920 There's something different and a different approach to things in the new ones.
00:03:32.280 So I appreciate that.
00:03:34.380 And then I saw you recently at the Ted Byfield event in Edmonton.
00:03:39.100 And of course, you know, he was an amazing Albertan and, you know, he came from elsewhere
00:03:43.760 in Alberta, but he established himself here.
00:03:46.440 And a little while ago, I read actually Ted Byfield, one of his books.
00:03:50.800 And it reminded me once I read your, you know, standing on guard for V on the unapologetic
00:03:57.800 social, conservative, and Christian stance, which is fine.
00:04:01.220 And I was really fascinated with it.
00:04:03.440 And I wanted to talk to you a little bit about that.
00:04:05.100 Not so much on the, I mean, we will talk a bit about the content of your book, but you
00:04:08.280 see where somebody like myself, I'm very much not on the socially conservative side
00:04:12.060 or, or, or a person of faith, but we have a big commonality in supporting individual
00:04:17.820 freedom.
00:04:18.280 And that's how we can sit in the same room and, and respect each other.
00:04:22.300 And, and if we could fix the system, that's how we could all be satisfied.
00:04:26.200 Like there is a way.
00:04:29.520 Yeah, for sure.
00:04:30.380 And, you know, for me, you know, I write about, um, as you mentioned that, that book
00:04:34.620 that's being redone, that's about, um, Christian political activism.
00:04:38.280 And one of the main people in that, like, there's three key people I identify in that.
00:04:43.620 And one of them is Ted Byfield.
00:04:45.420 And then when I write about Alberta independence topics, very often the key person again is
00:04:50.100 Ted Byfield.
00:04:50.700 Like he, he really, um, brings together both of those elements, but yeah, I mean, uh, like,
00:04:56.040 well, there's a, there's a term I've used in, in one of my other books that I call
00:04:58.740 by field conservatism and by field conservatism is, you know, there's three principles to it.
00:05:03.420 One is free enterprise economics, you kind of libertarian side of things.
00:05:06.720 Uh, one is, um, you know, defense of Western regional interests.
00:05:10.560 And one is, uh, defense of, you know, social conservative ideas like traditional morality.
00:05:14.840 But, you know, so those are kind of the bedrock ideas of what I call by field conservatism,
00:05:18.540 which is in a sense, Alberta conservatism.
00:05:20.560 But yeah, there, there is so much in common in terms of the individual freedom thing,
00:05:23.740 as you mentioned.
00:05:24.280 And, and, you know, that's why, you know, say a party like the UCP has elements of both
00:05:29.100 and they can work together, you know, um, in terms of, uh, like opposing the NDP.
00:05:33.500 Right.
00:05:34.000 So yeah.
00:05:35.380 And I mean, I think that the common enemy we always have is authoritarianism, whether it's
00:05:39.700 right or left, if it's too far, then, then we can't stay in the room.
00:05:43.820 Then we start fighting with each other.
00:05:45.280 And that's how we start spinning our wheels.
00:05:46.880 I saw just today, yet another one of those common type of court challenges there's down
00:05:51.420 in the States has been going for years.
00:05:52.720 I guess somebody had demanded, uh, I think it was in Colorado, a trans cake, a cake, you 0.99
00:05:57.920 know, uh, to celebrate, uh, his transition to a new gender.
00:06:03.820 You know, the court threw it out finally.
00:06:07.560 Can't we have both sides?
00:06:08.780 Can you not just say this is a grown adult and, and he or she can transition to whatever
00:06:12.120 the heck they please and go with what they will.
00:06:14.280 But this is also a private business owner.
00:06:15.880 And if they don't want to provide this, go to another bakery.
00:06:19.720 Like it should be that simple, but the far end on both sides are saying, well, you shouldn't
00:06:24.880 be allowed to do that as a grown adult.
00:06:26.460 And the other side is saying you shouldn't be allowed to do that as an independent business
00:06:29.460 owner.
00:06:29.760 And I think both are wrong.
00:06:33.000 Yeah.
00:06:33.360 Like, I think that's an important point you make there because, you know, a lot of the,
00:06:37.620 um, elements of, I would turn broadly the sexual revolution in this particular, you know,
00:06:42.160 say the gay rights element, a lot of it was originally proposed as a libertarian idea.
00:06:46.580 Let people live their lives as they want and do what they want.
00:06:49.300 And there's, and that gets support because that makes so much sense to so many people.
00:06:53.120 You live the way you want.
00:06:54.480 Let me live the way I want.
00:06:55.900 And we can get along together that way.
00:06:57.620 Right.
00:06:57.820 In society.
00:06:58.420 But you have the examples, like you brought up, here's a Christian businessman who does
00:07:02.320 not want to participate in certain, uh, you know, baking a cake for certain activities
00:07:06.760 or, or certain identities.
00:07:08.360 And yet, um, they go after him.
00:07:10.460 Like once they realize that he won't, you know, a number of, he's got a number of these
00:07:14.240 cases that have happened because people go directly to him deliberately to cause him
00:07:17.480 trouble because they want to force him to embrace their, their way of, of doing things.
00:07:21.820 Now, if they would like back off from that and say, well, he's, he's got his views.
00:07:25.700 We'll let him live according to his views.
00:07:27.780 He can do that.
00:07:28.600 And we'll do our thing.
00:07:29.780 You know, uh, we'd have a lot more peace in society.
00:07:31.760 If, if people were that way, you know, that that's the original libertarian thing.
00:07:35.300 You live your way and I'll live mine.
00:07:36.860 You know, that does provide a good basis, but, um, but it's so hard for many people to
00:07:41.060 accept that, you know, when they see someone who doesn't agree with them, they want to,
00:07:44.280 for some reason or other take action to, to shut that down or to force some kind of conformity.
00:07:48.680 And, you know, we see a lot of the right now because the progressives are, are, are in power
00:07:53.280 to one degree or another.
00:07:54.160 They want to enforce conformity.
00:07:55.900 Like we saw that with the NDP and the Christian schools, you know, if, uh, uh, uh, Rachel
00:07:59.980 Notley's government was going to shut down some Christian schools because they were unwilling
00:08:03.180 to adopt certain, uh, pro LGBTQ policies.
00:08:06.760 And if it wasn't for Jason Kenney being elected in 2019, you know, that would have gone ahead.
00:08:10.400 And it's, it's because, you know, the progressives and probably people on the right too, to some
00:08:14.280 degree have this thing that you must live according to what I believe.
00:08:18.020 And if you don't, then the government's going to make you do it.
00:08:20.360 You know what I mean? So, so that libertarian idealist is so much better in the sense of
00:08:24.800 allowing people just to live their own lives and not interfere with what other people are
00:08:29.700 doing in their own business.
00:08:30.760 Well, yeah. And school choice. I mean, it's such an integral part of the whole thing, because
00:08:34.840 I think that's where a lot of people, they have their different views. They want their
00:08:38.500 children educated with values that they share. And, and right now they're not leaving the
00:08:44.620 public system to be a generic, then reading, writing, and arithmetic institution. They're
00:08:49.440 putting in woke values into these institutions that a lot of parents differ with. People should
00:08:55.200 have the choice then to put their children into a different place. And that shouldn't
00:08:58.300 be controversial. Uh, but it is unfortunately. I mean, you know, what's wrong with a Christian 1.00
00:09:03.500 school? If you don't like it, don't go there. But, uh, do, do you talk? I don't believe so.
00:09:08.600 But I mean, you know, a voucher system, these are the things we could explore with a new system.
00:09:12.520 Like we could really bring about some things where we can allow those freedoms and choice.
00:09:17.080 Yeah. Well, actually, uh, this is one of the areas of lots of interest to me, even though
00:09:23.140 it's not in the standing on guard for the book, um, the idea of education, because my wife
00:09:26.580 and I, we've home educated right from the very beginning. Like we we've been firmly in that.
00:09:30.900 And so in graduate school, actually my kind of my area of expertise was on, on school choice
00:09:34.800 in Alberta to some degree. So this is a very important issue. You know, the progressives
00:09:39.660 like to talk about diversity, but then when it comes to school, it's one size fits all.
00:09:44.660 And the, the ideas that you're talking about educational choice, that is genuine diversity.
00:09:49.680 You know, you've got your public schools, charter schools, which are kind of public schools, different
00:09:53.600 kinds of independent schools, home education. The more options people have is the more genuine
00:09:58.760 diversity you have. And the more you actually, um, serve the needs of the people. Like there's
00:10:03.220 different kinds of families with different views. And, um, when you have this kind of educational
00:10:07.780 choice, like a vast amount of educational choice that serves the families where they're at. If they
00:10:11.940 want to go to public school, there's probably one right down the road. If they want a more
00:10:15.220 specialized charter school, maybe they can find one, especially if they're in a big city, you know,
00:10:18.740 if there, if there's a kind of private school that they want, there's, there's lots of different
00:10:22.500 kinds of ones, uh, you know, in Alberta, you know, partially depends on where you live and things
00:10:26.580 like that. And then home education, you can do that in any part of the province. And then even within
00:10:30.180 home education, um, there's like, there's different degrees to which you can, you can follow the
00:10:34.100 government curriculum, or you can follow a different curriculum, or you can do what some
00:10:37.220 people call unschooling, where you just kind of let the children, you know, follow their own
00:10:41.300 interests into whichever degree, but, but there's so much like, this is a real libertarian, uh, success
00:10:47.060 story, educational choice, that people can choose what's best for their family, for their children.
00:10:52.420 And they don't even have to choose one and stick with it. You know, if they can try something,
00:10:55.140 it's not working for their kids. Like a lot of people in home education, you know, first sent their
00:10:58.900 kids to school and the school didn't work for them. And so they can bring this child home and work with
00:11:03.940 the child home. Like there's just so much opportunity there. And so, and the more freedom
00:11:07.140 there is, the more genuine diversity there is, and the better the needs of the families and children
00:11:12.100 are served. Well, absolutely. I mean, one of the areas getting outside of the social conflict and
00:11:17.540 things like that is different children's do respond differently to different types of education.
00:11:22.340 Some kids are really well geared for a hands-on. They could be a fantastic mechanic or, uh, you know,
00:11:28.180 or a trades person or something like that. But in the public school, they treat that as if it's
00:11:33.060 not a decent trade or they say, that's where we stick the troublesome kids. Well, no, actually.
00:11:38.500 And, and perhaps if those children were put into the schools that they're better, uh, accustomed to,
00:11:43.380 they could be even better mechanics, even better, uh, electricians and such, and they'll do very well
00:11:48.340 for themselves. But you need to give that choice to apply to the different kids. As you said, we're,
00:11:51.780 we're trying to stuff everybody into the same bowl and it's harming all of them.
00:11:57.060 Yeah. And, you know, just as an example of that, and this is something I think I've experienced in my own
00:12:01.220 life is like boys in particular develop a little bit slower than girls do, uh, you know, academically.
00:12:07.380 And some boys at certain ages, you know, are not ready to read. Like in, we think in education,
00:12:12.500 well, at a certain age, every child should be reading at a certain level. You know what I mean?
00:12:15.860 But some boys develop slower. And, and like, I think I was that way. Cause I remember in grade two,
00:12:20.820 I was taken out of class to read with some new Canadian children. I was probably wasn't very good.
00:12:24.820 So when I was, I was forced to learn to read too early. And so boys that are forced to read too
00:12:30.980 early, learn that reading is hard. That's one of the messages they get. And they learn that they
00:12:35.380 don't like reading. You know what I mean? And later on reading became one of my favorite things,
00:12:39.380 but, but for many years I didn't like reading. And I think it was because it was pushed on me too early.
00:12:44.100 You know what I mean? I wasn't quite ready for it. And I think that's true for many boys. You know,
00:12:47.060 I've heard that before, well, this boy, he's, he's not reading up to his level and you want to shove it down his
00:12:51.700 throat and he's not going to like reading if you do that. You know what I mean? Or if you let them
00:12:55.540 develop at their own level, when they're ready, uh, then they, then they will like it because
00:12:59.780 they're ready for it. And there's few gifts better than literacy. Um, I'll kind of start closing to a
00:13:06.020 good question from one of the commenters. It kind of puts you on the spot. Maybe you don't have to come
00:13:09.540 up with all five, but it's a good question. Peter LaFontaine, you know, taking it back towards the
00:13:13.140 independence front, uh, saying, can, can your guests list five key policies that most Albertans would want and
00:13:17.860 agree on? And, uh, you know, kind of then what we don't have though, without the separation,
00:13:23.060 like what are we being held up from then in the current system?
00:13:28.660 Well, I think that like the number one thing would be economic development that we could do on our own.
00:13:32.980 Um, you know, the climate change policies, sorry, climate change policies of the Trudeau government,
00:13:39.460 you know, hamper our economic development. So, um, I think Albertans would, uh, agree for the most
00:13:44.980 part on the need for, um, having a robust development of our natural resources, especially
00:13:50.740 our energy resources. And I think we could do much better independently than under Justin Trudeau
00:13:56.260 and the Canadian government. Um, I don't know if I can do five. Uh, I mean, I just, I present,
00:14:01.940 I just present independence as an independent Alberta Albertans get to decide our future.
00:14:07.140 You know what I mean? Like right now, the way system, the system is, um, people essentially,
00:14:12.100 you know, generally speaking in Ontario and Quebec, they elect the government and they decide what,
00:14:16.740 what is best for Alberta, you know, in terms of the federal responsibilities. And so they make
00:14:21.060 these kinds of policies like climate change or, you know, uh, trying to restrict, uh, freedom of
00:14:25.780 expression on the internet. And I could, you know, if I had time, I could probably think of others.
00:14:29.620 And these are not policies favored by Albertans. These are favored by people I say in Toronto and
00:14:34.260 Montreal where, you know, so many of the votes come from that, uh, elect the government there.
00:14:38.660 So if we had our own government here in Alberta, the people who run the province, uh, would govern
00:14:45.540 the province in accordance with the desires of Albertans and not in accordance with the desires
00:14:49.300 of people in Toronto and Montreal. Like they'd have to, we would be electing our own leaders and
00:14:53.700 our own leaders would do what we want or else we'd get rid of them right now as it is. Um, we hope that
00:14:58.660 Justin Trudeau will lose the election, uh, next year, but it's not up to us. Like we were always voting
00:15:03.860 against them anyway. It's up to people in Ontario and Quebec to put them up. But so our destiny is
00:15:08.100 outside of our own control. Like this is a democracy. We're supposed to be able to elect the people
00:15:12.100 that, you know, make these decisions for us and our own destinies in our own control. That is only
00:15:16.100 possible for an independent country because right now our destiny is controlled by people who are 1.00
00:15:20.500 elected in, you know, Toronto and Montreal, Ottawa, that kind of area for the most part.
00:15:25.780 Yeah. And I mean, just, it's just that localized decision making it alone. I mean, then we could,
00:15:29.700 we could spend a lot of time talking about the different individual policies. The main thing is that using
00:15:33.700 independence as a catalyst to be able to rebuild that system. Um, so yeah, the time went quickly
00:15:38.820 and before I let you go, you know, these are the books, where can folks get out and get their copies
00:15:42.260 and guys, it's worth it. Michael's writing is great. Okay. Well, they're, they're going to be
00:15:46.820 available on Amazon. There's actually pages for them on Amazon. They standing on guard for the,
00:15:50.500 you can pre-order it already. It's being released in January 1st, uh, time to leave. Um, if there's a page
00:15:56.580 for it on Amazon, like Kindle's available, but for some reason, Amazon is dragging its feet on getting the paper
00:16:01.540 copies available, but at some point, Amazon should have them there hopefully soon. Also,
00:16:05.780 there's a local Alberta business. It's called merchant ship, but their website is merchant ship.ca.
00:16:11.220 They will be carrying both books. Uh, hopefully they'll soon have time to leave available there.
00:16:15.460 Cause I know they have copies. They just haven't had time to put it up on their website yet.
00:16:18.580 Excellent. Well, I, I appreciate you coming in to talk again. It's been a while and, uh, I, yeah,
00:16:24.820 I appreciate the writing and I hope folks rush out and get those. So, uh, thanks again, Michael,
00:16:28.900 Michael and I I'm sure we'll talk again soon. Thanks for having me. It's been great to talk to you.