Western Standard - September 25, 2026


Canada’s political crossroads: How did we get here?

Mentioned
Cory Morgan: Eby’s snap election gamble is already backfiring CORY MORGAN SHOW: The independence movement IS NOT GOING AWAY no matter what

Episode Stats


Length

35 minutes

Words per minute

169.08

Word count

5,942

Sentence count

101

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Politics feels chaotic right now. Every day seems to bring another controversy, another crisis, another argument about where Alberta and Canada are headed.
00:00:10.380 It can be difficult to know what matters, what is noise, and what any of it means for the decisions Albertans are taking and being asked to make on October 19th.
00:00:19.840 How did we get here, and more importantly, what comes next? The best place to start is with perspective.
00:00:30.000 This is a nation of people. I'm Natalie St. Hilaire and with me is Randy Royer.
00:00:49.480 There are two eternal things about politics. First, like physics, for every action there
00:00:55.000 is an equal and opposite reaction. Second, all politics is about the command and control
00:01:00.800 structure. Who has dominion over who?
00:01:06.200 Okay, Randy, so where do we want to start with the big picture of politics right now?
00:01:10.500 Well, you said it in the introduction, you know, in Western society, it's all about
00:01:15.220 domination. And it always has been, it's been, you know, a couple of millennia of who gets
00:01:19.380 to dominate who. That's our biggest battle. We always need to keep that in mind. So that's
00:01:23.920 we're let's let's start with that in our back of our mind so from the roman empire forward
00:01:28.880 maybe even before that a little bit but just absolutely the roman empire yes okay yeah okay
00:01:34.800 and so something else i mentioned in the introduction was like for every action there's
00:01:39.200 an equal and opposite reaction so how does that play out in politics well if you look at for
00:01:43.920 example the presidency of the united states um you know richard nixon for example would kind of left
00:01:50.160 office being viewed as a crook so who do they hire they hire the the honest peanut farmer uh
00:01:57.520 and and put him in his presidency uh he turns out to be uh kind of a minutiae kind of guy
00:02:04.640 and so what do they do then is they say well we need a big picture guy and that was ronald reagan
00:02:09.440 so um where do we start if you want like if we want to get a sense of what's going on right here
00:02:14.720 and right now because there's quite a lot going on there's a lot yeah where do we start start
00:02:18.720 world war ii and that sounds a little might be a little counterintuitive but world war ii was the
00:02:23.360 largest event in world history uh 80 million people died uh in between 1905 and 1950 20 of
00:02:32.240 humanity was either killed by men or by disease including the spanish flu and it was when you
00:02:40.080 look at it um you know and and you know my parents and a lot of our parents you know went through
00:02:44.800 that period and uh they all came back and had stories and horrific stories and it either brought
00:02:50.240 out the worst of us or the best of us but everyone had ptsd and so it was a giant ptsd event and so
00:02:58.240 that's the start of our current history and so what was the equal and opposite reaction
00:03:05.200 to world war ii so when people came out of world war ii they wanted to build their life again
00:03:11.360 because much of the, you know, Europe and all over the place,
00:03:15.080 it was largely destroyed.
00:03:17.080 And even in North America, you know, everyone came back with PTSD
00:03:20.360 and the communities that had lost so many sons and daughters,
00:03:24.560 you know, had PTSD.
00:03:26.100 So they really focused in on building their lives again.
00:03:29.920 So it was very much a material orientation.
00:03:33.180 I got to build a home, I got the white picket fence,
00:03:35.780 you know, live in suburbia, have the, you know,
00:03:38.360 the husband wife two kids one dog and so you know there is sort of an ideal family setting
00:03:44.920 and everyone drove to achieve those goals so it's very much a material kind of perspective
00:03:53.320 the opposite and equal reaction was the emergence of what we call what has been deemed to be called
00:04:00.360 post-materialism so that that's social all the sociologists call that uh the the you know the
00:04:07.080 reaction if you will to materialism yeah well I mean we went from like I think what most people
00:04:13.680 perceive as a pretty structured thing in the 50s into like I don't know the hippies in the 60s so
00:04:20.180 you see that swing happening right there and I definitely would say the hippie movement if you
00:04:25.060 want to characterize it as such was post material it was about love and ideas not about maybe like
00:04:32.900 having the white picket fence and the two and a half kids and the dog exactly that i mean that
00:04:38.020 that was sort of what we would observe you know observationally was was was exactly that was the
00:04:43.780 hippie movement and so it was a guy named uh in 1971 a guy named ronald englehart from the
00:04:49.540 university of michigan he actually identified it and he said that we had gone from a generation
00:04:55.460 that was very much you know material focused uh and and it it defined all of our relationships
00:05:02.180 including, you know, what the government meant to us.
00:05:04.760 So for the materialists, the government meant help me make material gates.
00:05:09.680 The post-materialists, they were all about, you know,
00:05:13.200 the sort of on Maslow's hierarchy of needs, it was the higher needs.
00:05:17.100 It's self-actualization, relationship between each other, that kind of thing.
00:05:21.780 And so they were worried about fairness in society.
00:05:25.780 They were worried about helping the people that were disadvantaged,
00:05:29.200 uh you know the social needs and and uh you're generally describing it as you know the love
00:05:34.280 of the 60s is exactly is exactly right and so the sociologist all they did was put a name to
00:05:41.820 what we observed and what's interesting is that that number was about uh about 20 at that time
00:05:49.400 and it continues and it wasn't just in north america it was all over there all over sort of
00:05:55.980 western world uh basically all the places that had been touched by the war and uh and it had to do
00:06:02.280 with you know the the the reaction to actually having some material gain and and that number
00:06:09.480 has been growing um so 20 of people were post-materialist yes and now that number has
00:06:15.340 grown to uh well in 2000 right around 2000 that number had had become a plurality so it was over
00:06:21.260 50 percent okay so most people believe in post material ideas yeah as opposed to being more
00:06:28.360 concerned about what they have materially being concerned with what would you say like post
00:06:33.720 material ideas are well how do i characters how do i identify somebody that's post material
00:06:40.340 um so post material is uh i've actually got written out here um intangible intangible
00:06:47.700 experiences uh community well-being and broader philosophy and scientific views about reality so
00:06:54.220 it's philosophically based it's it's uh it's care for your community care for each other
00:06:59.460 that kind of stuff and and and instead of just i'm going to work hard to get material gain
00:07:05.260 i'm working so that i can have my own spiritual gain my own social gains it's it's a different
00:07:11.420 measuring stick i'm getting self-help and oprah and the rise of sort of those you know like working
00:07:18.300 out and yeah i mean now we're into yoga maxing i mean yoga yoga okay okay never worked in the 50s
00:07:26.620 yeah no i know i have a strange distinction of having owned and operated a yoga business which 0.50
00:07:32.860 i don't know that you know any woman in western history before really the 90s yeah was was capable
00:07:40.460 of days so it's kind of an interesting thing to have been a part of but good for you that having
00:07:44.300 been said how did that play out politically how does post materialism look politically so in in
00:07:50.060 in 2008 um the obama president's presidential campaign uh recognized the opportunity and so
00:07:57.740 what they did was they uh now remember that the post materialists uh they are making individual
00:08:04.060 decisions saying this is what i want in the world this is what i want my life to be what the obama
00:08:09.660 campaign did was said and it reached out to those post materialists and said I can deliver I as the
00:08:17.540 your future president can deliver those things if you vote for me and surrender your power to me as
00:08:24.220 the president so flash back to the first comment that we made which is our entire history is about
00:08:31.980 the elite or those that aspire to be the elite figuring out how to use everything that's new
00:08:37.640 in this case it was a new sociological trend so i'm going to figure out how to use that speaking
00:08:43.500 as the potential president i'm going to figure out how to use that that new trend so that i can
00:08:50.240 take the power of the presidency and that's what obama did in 2008 and that was the cornerstone
00:08:55.060 that's why he had uh slogans like together and and things like that like the materialists they
00:09:01.440 don't care about together they just care about you know help me build my house uh whereas the
00:09:06.340 post-materialist they want that sense of community and a sense of of working together and stuff like
00:09:12.300 that so that that defined you know you can see it if you go back you can see it in the campaign
00:09:16.460 i actually wrote about this in a book in 2007 uh identifying post-materialist trend and identifying
00:09:24.260 that uh that this is exactly what obama was doing this he was using this trend and at that point in
00:09:29.860 time it was over 50 of the population yeah i think it's significant too to just be aware that this is
00:09:35.960 a trend that was happening in canada was happening in europe like it was already there obama just
00:09:41.080 took advantage of it and another thing that seems prescient to me is that it's sort of like post
00:09:46.760 material is almost like post-structural and there is a sense that one of those ideas in the post
00:09:54.300 material lexicon as you're describing it or ideology is uh like a idea that we're part of
00:10:00.840 some sort of global community. And so that's where you start to lose importance or lose sight of the
00:10:06.400 importance of something like borders of your country. So that's where we start to cross over
00:10:11.900 through Obama, right, into a communication of what some might say are globalist ideas.
00:10:19.160 Well, exactly. I mean, again, it's the same thing that the people that view themselves as elite
00:10:23.400 figure out how to use each new trend to their personal advantage. And so the globalists take
00:10:29.820 these i would say well-intentioned ideas of the masses and and again say to them like obama did
00:10:38.540 surrender your power to me and i will give you i'll make all your dreams come true it sounds like
00:10:44.220 the uh vote for pablo make all your dreams come true yeah yeah yeah napoleon dynamite thank you
00:10:53.740 okay well did obama make everyone's dreams come true well his dreams certainly came true he was
00:10:58.860 probably for two terms so yeah that's probably all that really counts for for some people indeed
00:11:03.980 but they but but you're absolutely right that the elitist did exactly the same thing that they use
00:11:08.620 that to say to people i will make your dreams come true and then then they ended up having all these
00:11:13.740 social program programs to keep uh to keep people engaged with their power to keep them surrendering
00:11:21.580 their power to these elitists ultimately it got into you know climate and all that stuff and you
00:11:27.420 You know, wind backwards three years and the climate change was going to kill humanity and it was all the issue.
00:11:36.200 Now all of a sudden it's gone.
00:11:38.740 And the global, I would suggest that what's now happening is the equal and opposite reaction,
00:11:47.640 that there's now a fight back against the globalists, not to push the power back to the individuals,
00:11:55.480 these nice people that are post-materialists but to say no i want those post-materialists
00:12:01.080 to follow me instead and so they're breaking down the globalist elitist structure and replacing it
00:12:07.800 with what they want instead so um and so i'm kind of saying nobody at the top has good intentions
00:12:15.000 to help the people at the bottom well i know a couple people that might agree with you on that
00:12:19.880 point so that's how post materialism played out in the united states but where does canada
00:12:25.400 specifically fit in with post materialism so that started in 2008 and canada had at that point in
00:12:31.400 time had really given into doing whatever the united states had done and we were just decided
00:12:36.120 we were gonna you know be mini me you know from uh uh um austin power austin powers social cultural
00:12:46.280 references but i can't remember any of the names but uh so you know so we're the mini me so we're
00:12:51.320 the the short guy with the bald head yeah and so whatever the united states did we just did the
00:12:55.800 same thing and and trudeau saw the success of the democratic party and said we're going to do exactly
00:13:01.560 the same thing so what they did was they leaned into the same social um the same post materialist
00:13:07.880 uh interest and and and because of canada's and we talked about this a couple episodes ago
00:13:14.760 um you know we're principle-based uh democracies principle-based society uh and we have a high
00:13:21.080 opinion of our principles we were even a little more susceptible than they were in the u.s
00:13:26.680 and so uh you know trudeau um found out that his act had to be that he cared about all these social
00:13:35.640 programs uh he was a great drama teacher and actor and uh and so he presented that he was um
00:13:44.680 cared about you know women's issues about the environment of you know saying things like no
00:13:49.800 we say people kind and not mankind uh sorry i'm getting painful here now
00:13:57.160 well it's just one of those things where like yeah it's all really good intention but
00:14:01.240 even if you just think about it, if you're post materialist, if you've stopped really caring about
00:14:06.840 the importance of material things, because you want to be nice, you want to take care of people
00:14:11.720 and you want a society and a culture that actually just cares about how people are feeling like that,
00:14:17.400 then eventually, though, you're going to run out of things which impacts people on the lower
00:14:22.360 socioeconomic part of things, because you have less things to help them, which they actually
00:14:28.600 need like it's like that you know a downward spiral of of socialism that inherently always
00:14:34.760 takes over but okay back to uh the the situation at hand so we had obama and then we had the equal
00:14:42.920 and opposite reaction of the trump administration is equal and opposite reaction and what again the
00:14:51.640 u.s experience was that what they did was they dove into the materialist crop and that is
00:14:58.120 substantially the you know the christian nationalists who have you know preferred and
00:15:02.680 this is nobody's wrong or right i'm sorry i the ones that are wrong and right to me are the ones
00:15:07.560 with the at the top manipulating the people's bottom but you know the average person we're not
00:15:12.840 they're not right or wrong they just are the way they are and they are being manipulated by the
00:15:16.920 ones at the top so um so the ones at the top manipulated the the ones that think that still
00:15:22.760 had the materials materialist values and a lot of people in that category or you know christian
00:15:27.960 nationalists and religious and all that stuff and that's why um you know that's why there's so many
00:15:34.120 people that present um president trump as though he's like a jesus-like figure is that that plays
00:15:41.480 into that traditional materialist perspective so the equal and opposite reaction of the obama
00:15:48.200 escapade has been trumped so i don't know that it has played out quite the same way in canada
00:15:55.460 actually i'm not sure uh what's the it doesn't seem like we've had the same polarity swing
00:16:01.840 well yeah and part of that is that we had more post-materialists and and uh and that the other
00:16:07.640 part of it is that we don't really have you know the christian christian nationalist movement here
00:16:12.580 there's some uh but you know i mean we don't even have a nationalist movement never mind a christian
00:16:17.520 nationalist movement and so there wasn't the the uh the conservatives couldn't just do the same
00:16:23.060 game plan so what they did instead was um they leaned into regionalism and they leaned into just
00:16:30.100 straight materialism and and that was uh uh that both of those things were the harper prime
00:16:36.720 ministership uh on one hand uh that if you look at the history of of ontario what they do is they
00:16:43.480 their mind, and they say, okay, well, if there's a problem in Quebec, we'll give you a prime
00:16:48.540 minister from Quebec. And so we'll go solve that problem. There is issues around Alberta and what
00:16:55.020 have you. So their answer to that, and because of the Ontario mindset is, okay, we're going to let
00:17:00.120 you have a prime minister from Alberta. And that was Stephen Harper. So Stephen Harper was really
00:17:05.000 the last materialist prime minister. And the benefit of it was, you know, the Canadian dollar
00:17:13.340 went up to $1.14 at one point in time we were rocking it on the in the economy things were
00:17:18.860 going well you know we were as we talked about in the earlier episode we were we were on the
00:17:23.260 economist magazine as cool canadians have the moose with the sunglasses on you know so we were
00:17:27.900 like that was that was that was a good response uh and it was a canadian response subsequently
00:17:35.580 the conservative party got a little bit lost uh you know they tried a a good parliamentarian they
00:17:41.340 tried uh kind of a mini me liberal and uh and now they've and then uh the and then they tried
00:17:48.940 someone that sort of um sort of his demeanor appears to be the kind of trump-esque so it was
00:17:58.300 kind of a populist demeanor because again that's what how we read what happened in the united
00:18:03.660 states so we're following that none of those things have worked yeah so what should we have
00:18:08.700 done as conservatives well i contest that the big opportunity is to lean into who we are as
00:18:17.580 canadians and who we are as canadians is number one uh and we've talked about this in the in the
00:18:23.820 last episode i think it was that we uh we value a principle-based society that's number one number
00:18:31.020 two is that we took self-sovereignty so if you consider what happened in economics and then apply
00:18:37.420 that to the social realm what happened in economics was um and this is goes years back
00:18:43.260 and not in canada but in overseas that um the the elite convinced people that if you want to get
00:18:49.980 material gain so this is call it 1900 if you want to get material gain you have to surrender to us
00:18:55.340 and us with the elite will create wealth for you and we'll run the economy we'll do everything
00:19:01.420 that's called communism right communism ran its course and it and and then social democratic
00:19:08.380 you know interventionism and all that stuff ran its course and proved that the government could
00:19:13.580 not deliver economic advancement couldn't economic wealth couldn't deliver it in the same way on the
00:19:21.100 social side the opportunity i think for the democrats i sorry for the conservative party
00:19:26.860 in canada is to do exactly the same thing to show that the left-leaning parties have not delivered
00:19:36.540 the social promises that they that they put forward that they actually haven't changed society they
00:19:43.820 haven't delivered all this good stuff in fact it's actually gotten worse so the opportunity
00:19:48.940 for the conservatives is to go back to the canadian way and say we believe that the individual
00:19:56.300 can deliver social success that you want so to go after the post materialist from the perspective of
00:20:05.180 self-initiative entrepreneurship we can set the table for you and then you do it versus
00:20:12.460 i would say the liberal party is about surrender your surrender yourself to us and we'll take care
00:20:19.180 of you so the uh do the same thing that was done in economics that made conservatives popular and
00:20:25.500 Stephen Parper popular, do the same thing on social programs.
00:20:28.880 Yeah, well, there's definitely some rumblings coming out of some thinkers
00:20:32.060 in what's being called the New Right Movement in Conservative Canada right now,
00:20:38.900 talking also about duty and duty to each other,
00:20:41.640 not the duty of the state to take care of us,
00:20:43.860 but the duty we have to take care of the other humans around us, of our communities.
00:20:50.360 So I think it really aligns.
00:20:51.840 So that new thought in the new right is really aligning with where you're going here, Andy.
00:20:56.580 I love the word duty.
00:20:58.260 Yeah.
00:20:58.500 Because that's what society, and add to that this concept that we talked about, about principle-based society.
00:21:06.560 So if you have a principle-based society that has a duty to each other, to me, if the Conservative Party adopted that, I think they would become an incredible force in this country.
00:21:18.700 Yeah, and I'll just say there's a book right now, Anti-Civilization, that talks about, you know, not exactly everything that you're talking about, but a lot of that sort of duty and how that is essentially what makes civilization is a sense of duty to one another.
00:21:34.900 Absolutely.
00:21:35.500 And that that doesn't come from the state, that that comes from each of us.
00:21:38.800 So, you know, the state, you know, in a conservative, potential conservative perspective, the state sets the table. And then the people do their duty within that table. So one of the things, you know, we've talked, we introduced it is this concept of citizens guilt, where they actually actively, you know, regulate the government, watch over them, enforce the things that we the people want, rather than what the government wants to deliver.
00:22:06.220 Yeah, it's a great idea.
00:22:07.500 Okay, but back to where we're at right now in Canada.
00:22:11.200 So because we don't necessarily have that as part of our popular discourse.
00:22:16.240 Yeah.
00:22:16.940 What's going on?
00:22:18.540 Well, I mean, you know, we've fallen into what I would refer to as a separation trap.
00:22:24.980 And I'm going to describe this, and maybe you can help me on it, is, you know, I'm going to talk about a personal marriage.
00:22:31.360 so uh one spouse has absolutely no say in what you know what we can do and uh and you know what
00:22:39.020 the part what the couple does and and then when they just say you know i'd really like to go do
00:22:43.860 you want a divorce you want a divorce so it's it's it's it's the position where you're not allowed
00:22:49.100 any input except for something that is so extreme that you don't don't want to do it and and that's
00:22:56.640 i mean i use the term separation trap that sounds like you know the separate separation that we're
00:23:01.520 doing in in uh you know we're talking about in alberta but it's in any kind of human relationship
00:23:07.120 and and uh and so we need to take a look at instead of just falling to the to the extreme
00:23:14.000 which is a hard choice someone stuck in that position needs to figure out other things that
00:23:19.680 they can do and other strategies yeah and uh what other options might there be well we're certainly
00:23:27.680 in this episode sorry in this podcast we're talking about the you know looking at the
00:23:31.840 constitution and uh you know what i'm coming to realize is that um you know we can in alberta
00:23:40.400 have a vote on the constitution we can reject it and we can put something on the table
00:23:44.480 the next step is and you know we'll talk about this again but the next step is to to take that
00:23:52.160 idea to British Columbia both to me the idea of what a conservative post-materialist perspective
00:24:00.180 might be which is duty as you said and duty to each other duty to the land also by the way
00:24:06.500 but take that to British Columbia and if you look at the two provinces and and add in Saskatchewan
00:24:14.360 hopefully manitoba if the west spoke in one voice uh we just the two provinces of alberta and
00:24:22.280 british columbia have the same population as quebec right now in a few years because both of
00:24:29.640 those provinces are growing and and ontario and quebec are really not growing uh british columbia
00:24:36.040 will probably be in the magnitude of 9 million people and alberta will be 6 million people we
00:24:40.760 will be the size together will be the size of ontario in population so if we work together
00:24:47.560 we can make those changes and and we can really command what happens both to us directly and and
00:24:55.880 possibly uh to the to the country yeah well i'd love to see alberta and bc on the same page that's
00:25:01.240 for sure um okay so what's going on then like in the context of what we're talking about today with
00:25:07.400 the post-materialism now you have the conflict that's going on and the tariffs that are going
00:25:11.640 on with the us what's how does that fit in well this is uh you know the character of the united
00:25:17.880 states we've talked about the west character the east character in canada and and the united states
00:25:22.680 has its own character of course and one of the aspects of its character is there is a high degree
00:25:27.960 of confrontation leads to violence and all that stuff i mean if you look at the history of the
00:25:32.600 united states they've invaded a lot of countries in the last you know since world war ii they seem
00:25:37.560 to be bombing somebody all the time currently they're bombing uh i mean they're embargoing
00:25:43.240 uh cuba they're bombing iran they have a trade war with us they're very energetic in these kinds
00:25:49.320 of conflicts um you know i can tell stories about uh you know going to meetings with americans and
00:25:55.480 then they're just blowing up um and uh so part of the character is that and so part of the character
00:26:04.120 and the equal and opposite reaction that the trump era was to this togetherness concept was
00:26:11.160 the the concept of conflict and that people wanted conflict and they wanted to punish the other side
00:26:18.520 so that the materialist folks said you know we've been controlled by these they didn't use words but
00:26:25.320 post-materialists for so long and their love dove and all that stuff we want what we want
00:26:30.120 is we want to get them back we want punishment and so the administration understands that and and
00:26:36.440 and doling out punishment is part of their strategy to keep their folks behind them
00:26:42.760 unfortunately because canada is you know the we're the we made ourselves the weak boy on the on the
00:26:48.920 playground uh we're the easiest ones to punish and that's what trump is doing okay interesting
00:26:54.440 perspective um and then alberta because that's where we're from how does alberta fit into that
00:27:01.240 cycle well i mean we're part of the punishment routine right now and that's what he's going
00:27:06.040 after but we have uh we have another issue and that is um that is our oil reserves and so if you
00:27:13.800 look at um look at the four top nations uh that have of oil reserves in the world so proven
00:27:20.440 reserves top four countries that have the highest proven reserves they are number one venezuela
00:27:25.760 oops invaded that now trump has done a deal where he gets 65 billion barrels got good got that under
00:27:33.200 control second one is saudi arabia they have an existing relationship with saudi arabia that's
00:27:38.400 pretty posy um you know they're investing in uh trump's son's company i think there's two billion
00:27:45.120 dollar investment so there's a pretty good relationship there they don't need to worry
00:27:48.420 about them the third one is iran and they're of course they're currently bombing iran and and i
00:27:54.620 don't think anyone would think that this isn't partially about their oil reserves and the fourth
00:27:59.420 one is canada slash alberta so uh if if one can assume that uh the american imperialism
00:28:11.200 which has emerged now is about gaining control of oil reserves therefore exerting their power
00:28:17.900 through oil reserves which is it's not a new plan uh that translates to uh if you have the five
00:28:25.040 countries including the u.s which is actually the biggest producer in the world i think the numbers
00:28:30.640 are that uh the it represents almost 50 percent of that's actually 40 something percent of the
00:28:39.040 actual global oil reserves and 50 of the production so that is less than what sorry
00:28:47.540 That is more than what OPEC had when it turned the world upside down.
00:28:52.960 So one would look at that, and we have to be realistic, that for all the world, it looks like there is a strategy there where the U.S. administration is trying to control the global reserves and the global production of oil and therefore express and therefore have the ability to push people around.
00:29:15.120 Yeah, you wouldn't be alone in the viewpoint that there's some sort of control of the hemisphere and of oil also going on.
00:29:23.340 I mean, it's apparent something like that's happening.
00:29:25.740 And I think it's been said, but won't that change with the next president?
00:29:30.660 You know, you don't know.
00:29:32.560 You know, there is, you need to remember that there is a contingent that, you know, 80 million people voted for this administration.
00:29:41.440 And so there is a contingent that wants these things to happen.
00:29:44.980 You know, the United States clearly does not want to, you know, be the benevolent leader of the world that it has been, but it still wants to get its way in the world.
00:29:57.580 I mean, the national security document specifically says that they are going to assume their natural role of being the dominant entity in the Western Hemisphere.
00:30:08.420 So we're back to the same game that we started with, which is domination and control of the elites and over the populace.
00:30:16.200 Absolutely. Absolutely.
00:30:17.660 Okay. Well, what choices do we have in Alberta?
00:30:20.020 Well, you know, we're going to introduce Roy Fox in our next episode.
00:30:25.600 And we're going to talk about partnership.
00:30:28.360 And the partnership concept to the elite of the world is not, they don't have that concept.
00:30:35.760 What they like is domination.
00:30:38.420 what we have in our history is partnership and so we're going to explore with roy the concept
00:30:43.940 of partnership with the indigenous and what we can do together uh and and get on the same page
00:30:49.940 for development so that we can if we're in an economic war uh we need to be able to work
00:30:55.220 together to prosper and to increase our security and so we're going to start identifying things
00:31:01.140 like um you know uh our relationship with the indigenous there's five treaties uh there's a
00:31:07.780 bunch of uh reserves and those those reserves are in roy's case it's a big spot of land but
00:31:13.460 all the rest of them are you know well-defined pieces of land but the treaty that defined that
00:31:19.380 reserve just for the indigenous covers much of southern alberta and so the five treaties
00:31:25.700 really represent all of the land and so in our partnership is on those treaties that's as we've
00:31:31.780 talked about before that's why we're here that's we were invited by treaties so in our next episode
00:31:37.380 we're going to be talking about how those major land uh we we need to work together and and we
00:31:43.780 can't have a you know we can't have a swiss cheese alberta where you know treaty seven is gone well
00:31:49.700 that's a huge chunk of of the province you know treaty six it's a huge chunk of the province
00:31:54.920 So what we can do that's different is we can accept the concept of who we are, which is we live in a partnership.
00:32:05.440 And we have to understand that.
00:32:07.660 Well, I know it's difficult for conservatives sometimes to feel that they're in partnership.
00:32:15.460 We tend to be more individualistic, right?
00:32:18.020 And I think that, you know, understanding that Alberta is completely covered in treaty land helps me understand differently, because sometimes when I think about indigenous rights, I think about them as being on the reserves and that that's the land that they were sort of given.
00:32:33.960 But what I'm to understand is if we're going to go back and look at the Constitution and make that right, we also have to look at the treaties which cover the entirety of Alberta and our pre-existing, I believe, even our Constitution and make everything sort of workable.
00:32:52.260 Yeah. Because overall, I would say the situation we're in, whether you look at it in Confederation or whether you look at it through what's happening with the Indigenous and the consultation that needs to go on before projects are started and sort of a lack of completion in that process has led to just a lot of like unworkability in our economy and our country.
00:33:16.500 I mean, one of the problems, we're not on the same page. So if you build a, you know, build a mine somewhere in Alberta, the Indigenous don't get any more money from that. So why would they say yes? So, you know, one of the things I learned in business, and this is just a business case. It is what it is. How do we make the circumstances to our advantage? 0.95
00:33:41.620 and uh and this you know the indigenous view it the same way sure you want a gold mine there
00:33:47.860 what do we get out of it why should we say yes and and our structure it doesn't accommodate that so
00:33:53.220 what we're going to talk about is sort of a new a modern version of the treaties and and how do we
00:33:58.980 actually now that we understand it how do we get people on the same page how do we give them
00:34:04.100 financial autonomy how do we how do we create the situation where our partners prosper as we do
00:34:09.460 Well, I look forward to all the ideas and talking with you more in that episode. Thanks, Randy.
00:34:14.000 I look forward to it. Thanks, Natalie.
00:34:15.880 We didn't just somehow descend into this political situation. We arrived here in a series of actions
00:34:22.100 and counteractions. By understanding the events and the consequences, we can better understand
00:34:27.800 the coming circumstances and measure our action to mold the future of our choosing. But that also
00:34:33.720 requires a modicum of self-awareness of not just who we are as individuals but as a society
00:34:40.000 and in Alberta that in society includes the origins in treaty and the impact of Indigenous
00:34:46.020 aspect of our identity. That will be the topic of our next podcast as we welcome our first guest
00:34:52.560 Roy Fox, the past chief of the Blood Tribe of the Blackfoot Nation in Southern Alberta. See you then.
00:35:03.720 Should I stay or should I go now?