Western Standard - November 12, 2026


Carney’s budget is a gamble on Canada’s future

Harper, Trump and the Problem With Political Legacies

Episode Stats


Length

26 minutes

Words per minute

154.97

Word count

4,145

Sentence count

298

Harmful content

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

9

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00 Good evening, Western Standard viewers, and welcome to Hannaford, a weekly politics show
00:00:20 of the Western Standard. It is Thursday, November the 12th. Last week, Finance Minister
00:00:26 Champagne delivered the budget, but really
00:00:28 it was Prime Minister Carney's
00:00:30 budget. It seems
00:00:32 to Canada's commentariat that it
00:00:34 landed with a dull FUD. In the
00:00:36 Globe and Mail, Andrew Coyne called it
00:00:38 a strange budget, as opaque
00:00:40 as it is complacent.
00:00:43 But what about the investment
00:00:44 community and the people who manage
00:00:46 your money? What do they say?
00:00:50 With me
00:00:50 this evening is our old
00:00:52 friend, Peter Pajovic.
00:00:55 He is Senior Portfolio Manager at Piovich Big Hill Private Wealth and Wellington Altus.
00:01:00 Peter, it's great to have you here.
00:01:02 Nigel, thank you once again for having me on your fine show.
00:01:05 It's both an honour and a privilege.
00:01:07 You are too kind, but I've never retaliated on people who are too kind.
00:01:13 Of course.
00:01:13 Look, let's talk about the budget.
00:01:19 What do you make of it?
00:01:21 It seems to me that if you take on debt, you become the slave to the lender.
00:01:25 I mean, is this smart?
00:01:28 You're talking about the masters of our destiny budget?
00:01:31 Yes.
00:01:31 Yeah.
00:01:32 I will.
00:01:33 Yeah.
00:01:33 And being, are you quoting the Bible there, Proverbs by chance, Nigel?
00:01:38 I may have been.
00:01:39 You may have been.
00:01:40 Yeah.
00:01:40 Yeah.
00:01:41 So, of course, you know, it is true the more and more debt you accrue, you do become a slave to those who hold your debt.
00:01:52 And in this budget, as most other budgets, let's be honest, like there's very few budgets we've had in the last, you know, dozens and dozens of years that didn't increase debt.
00:02:02 Can't think of one since 2015.
00:02:05 Yeah, it's been a while, right?
00:02:06 So, I may almost phrase it as a gambler's budget.
00:02:12 A gambler's budget.
00:02:13 A gambler's budget, yes.
00:02:14 So, essentially, there's been a criticism of Canada for many years now, at least 10 years, maybe even more, where it has not been a friendly place for capital, whether it's private capital or foreign capital, to come to.
00:02:30 because the tax regime for that capital in Canada
00:02:36 simply wasn't as competitive as it is in many other parts of the world.
00:02:40 So capital flows essentially to where it's treated best,
00:02:44 and it hasn't been treated best in Canada for a long time.
00:02:49 So this budget, to its credit, actually aims to correct some of those old ills
00:02:55 and create an environment that's more conducive for capital to come into.
00:03:01 However, and this is a huge however,
00:03:04 it's going to rest so much on execution and so much on trust
00:03:09 so that capital needs to trust Canada
00:03:10 that it's actually going to be able to execute and deliver
00:03:13 such that there's profit.
00:03:17 Well, that, I guess, is a given,
00:03:19 but when we're dealing with the particulars of the case,
00:03:23 why would people given this excellent budget from uh from your perspective it's everything you
00:03:31 the investment community has been asking for for the years all right there it is now what's the
00:03:39 problem so i mean i wouldn't say that it's everything you know you've been asking for for
00:03:45 years i didn't see a lot in terms of tax deductions okay you know for uh let's just say uh people in
00:03:52 Canada that are very much overtaxed, which are now going to continue to be, you know, overtaxed,
00:03:58 you know, but at least both on the capital expenditure side. So there's actually in this
00:04:06 budget, you know, measures to create tax deductibility of capital expenditures that is
00:04:12 actually very similar to what we have in the U.S. right now. So I find that a little bit
00:04:17 interesting, whether it's almost like an aligning of policies, uh, in some respects, uh, with the
00:04:21 U S so that if you are, uh, going to do a large project, a pipeline or, you know, uh, dig new
00:04:28 oil wells, uh, electrical infrastructure, um, you know, you're going to, um, you know, have very,
00:04:34 very favorable tax deductions, um, on the capital expenditures to make sure that project gets off
00:04:39 the ground. Uh, uh, furthermore for capital that does come in, you know, under certain circumstances,
00:04:46 they're going to allow a much higher, up to $15 million,
00:04:49 whether we're talking about capital gains exemptions.
00:04:54 So conceivably, as an investor, your first $15 million of gains
00:05:00 could be considered tax-free, and that's a good reason
00:05:04 for foreign capital and private capital to show up.
00:05:08 But again, it'll hinge on trust and execution.
00:05:12 Trust and execution.
00:05:15 Uh, another way, certainly as far as execution is concerned, what I think you are saying to me is that these projects do have to get approved or else the whole thing falls apart.
00:05:30 Correct.
00:05:30 You still have the debt.
00:05:31 Correct.
00:05:32 And the interest.
00:05:33 And that's your risk.
00:05:34 Right.
00:05:35 Because to allow for these tax deductions, they're going to need more debt because that's revenue that's not coming in.
00:05:42 Well, let me be a little provocative here. It's not that nobody has said this before, but you usually sort of say it behind your hand. It's all very well to say we're going to build a something.
00:05:56 But if it involves indigenous-owned land, or even if it just – these days it's become very fashionable just to consult with indigenous people because you ought to talk to them, whether they own the land or have a stake in it or not.
00:06:17 I mean, that's one thing right there.
00:06:19 It's one thing.
00:06:20 There's more.
00:06:21 Well, okay. Tell me about Lemoore and maybe just elaborate a little on the risk to us, the taxpayers. What's this going to look like if it doesn't work?
00:06:33 you can create all the tax incentives you want for capital to come into canada we allow uh higher
00:06:41 limits for capital gains as an example or you allow um you know deductions on um on capital
00:06:47 expenditures but it's really all for naught if if we don't get picks and shovels in the ground
00:06:53 and get projects approved uh and wet and right now the concern or what the concern has been for
00:06:58 years um you know uh possibly you know uh that you know because of a dispute say with a a band
00:07:06 you know that maybe that project doesn't get approved or maybe it's intra-provincial trade
00:07:11 barriers or you know arguing between alberta and bc or alberta all the way to manitoba in terms of
00:07:17 whether you can get a pipeline through or not um that's a problem um you know uh ultimately you
00:07:24 You know, announcements are nice, but we need a lot more than just announcements.
00:07:28 We need projects actually approved and picks and shuttles in the ground.
00:07:32 Now, one of the first things that Mr. Carney did was to establish a special projects office.
00:07:38 And that was intended to cut the corners on a lot of the kind of projects that we're talking about here.
00:07:46 And it's not just pipelines.
00:07:48 There were other things that were...
00:07:50 Electrical infrastructure.
00:07:51 Electrical, yes, and so forth.
00:07:52 I believe the Quebec Icebreakers project was also part of the initial lineup.
00:07:59 And that was an announcement on a couple of weeks ago.
00:08:02 So that at least seems to be on track.
00:08:05 How many of these projects have been approved on Agile?
00:08:08 I'm asking for an exact number, but.
00:08:10 Well, I mean.
00:08:12 Not enough?
00:08:13 None, as far as I know.
00:08:14 Other than sort of the general blessing that the Davies shipyards got.
00:08:19 Yeah. And I do think that probably is happening. But where's my pipeline? Where's my electrical infrastructure? Where's my railway to the Churchill so that we don't have to export gas through Quebec? Because Quebec, there's another roadblock that we often talk about. I often talk about the indigenous bands, but darn it, Quebec is not exactly a team player in this.
00:08:46 And now, by the way, we have a new government in British Columbia, which is not ideologically opposed to pipelines, but they've got their hands full on the indigenous file as well.
00:08:59 So I have to wonder how long – you can borrow the money as soon as you want, but how long can Mr. Carney take to actually produce a project and say we're going to start work on it on this date and it's a close date?
00:09:22 Yeah. So it's what I mentioned earlier about trust. And the lack thereof of trust probably stems from the last 10 years of just simply the lack of approvals or difficulty in approvals of getting projects done. Mr. Carney has promised to expedite that, as you mentioned. We still haven't had a lot of actual action on that.
00:09:45 Now, in fairness, though, you know, to get that action, you know, it's not like you flick a switch, you know, there's certainly things that have to, there's a road that has to be paid first. And this, you could argue that this budget is a start, you know, by creating the tax regime, which allows capital to come in in a favorable manner, you know, into Canada, that's a start.
00:10:10 That's definitely a good start.
00:10:12 But it's a gambler's budget because that involves taking on more and more debt, too.
00:10:16 And if the capital doesn't come, essentially, then we're just saddled with more debt.
00:10:22 Well, they'll find a use for the money, I'm sure.
00:10:25 In fact, I believe they've just had a windfall, thanks to, Mr. Carney would hate to admit this,
00:10:32 but thanks to the actions of President Trump in the Gulf of Hormuz, oil is up.
00:10:38 So money is flowing into the producer country's coffers.
00:10:43 We are a producer country.
00:10:45 Alberta certainly has gone from a deficit situation for this fiscal year to in the black.
00:10:51 And there has been a substantial windfall to the federal government.
00:10:56 What did they do with that?
00:11:00 Didn't they spend it?
00:11:01 The federal government?
00:11:02 Yeah, the federal.
00:11:03 Alberta is a different discussion.
00:11:04 Yeah, so the budget did cite windfalls from oil and gas revenues, which of course is primarily Alberta and Saskatchewan.
00:11:14 And they're using that to essentially, and it was a very nice windfall, actually, which is ironically, again, you know, caused by the Iran war, which, you know, you can chew on that in terms of what that means.
00:11:30 You know, but they use that mainly to pave the way for some of these tax incentives.
00:11:38 It's not being used to pay down debt, if that's what you're asking.
00:11:41 Yes.
00:11:42 You know, but it is creating room in the budget for these tax incentives.
00:11:47 Now, that's also a very, you know, risky thing as well, because, you know, the reason we had this surplus was because of, largely, is because of the Iran war.
00:11:59 What happens if that war ends, you know, tomorrow? 0.81
00:12:03 And I hope it does in many respects.
00:12:06 You know, you never want to see, you know, wars, you know, perpetuate long term.
00:12:10 But if it does, presumably the price of oil comes down.
00:12:14 And then what?
00:12:15 And the only real way, you know, we're going to be able to maintain that surplus of cash is to increase production.
00:12:25 Okay.
00:12:26 That lays it out very well.
00:12:28 But there's one other big thing going on right now that bears into this, and that's Mr. Carney's affection for Europe, his approach to Europe, the discussion as to what kind of associate membership Canada may have with Europe one of these days.
00:12:44 But I would put it to, I mean, I've written this already.
00:12:47 I would put it to Peter that the Europeans are in worse shape than we are. 0.97
00:12:52 They owe more money. 1.00
00:12:52 They can't control their borders. 0.64
00:12:54 Their defense posture is weak relative to the threats that they think they face from Russia. 0.51
00:13:00 We're talking about wars ending. 0.98
00:13:02 It would be great to see the things wind up in the Ukraine too.
00:13:05 I'd like to see that.
00:13:06 So how much sense does it make?
00:13:11 Well, I don't think it makes much sense at all.
00:13:13 Well, what are the risks that Mr. Carney is prepared to accept in nudging up to Europe and developing closer relations?
00:13:23 So, Nigel, are you asking essentially, does he really wish to acquire closer relations, possibly an EU membership or associate membership, you know, with the EU?
00:13:34 Or is this mostly bargaining theater aimed at getting a better deal with the United States?
00:13:41 I think that is what I'm asking.
00:13:43 Go ahead.
00:13:43 Yeah, yeah.
00:13:44 So if it is theatre, I've used this term before, it's called statecraft.
00:13:49 So, you know, which essentially is a form of political theatre.
00:13:54 So which is it, you know, essentially?
00:13:57 So, but let's kind of parse through some of the facts.
00:14:01 So if this is what Mr. Carney really wants, like if he actually really wants, you know, closer associations with Europe, especially if it's a membership in the EU.
00:14:13 Facts. Europe is in a far worse fiscal and monetary position than Canada, okay?
00:14:21 So for all Canada's faults and problems, you know, we are a much cleaner, dirty shirt than…
00:14:26 Cleaner, dirty shirt.
00:14:28 Cleaner, dirty shirt. We're all dirty shirts.
00:14:30 Like, I don't know. Show me a country that's not a dirty shirt.
00:14:33 Is this a talk inside the finance industry?
00:14:36 Yeah, I didn't invent it. I did not invent it. It's something that's been thrown around.
00:14:40 Canada is a cleaner, dirty shirt.
00:14:42 Everybody's got dirty shirts on, but our shirt is a little bit cleaner than a lot of theirs. 0.98
00:14:49 So, I mean, just it may be evidence of that is recall that not long ago, you know, five countries in Europe were labeled as pigs, you know, which is pigs. 0.95
00:15:00 Yeah. So that's a very unflattering term that's used to describe the finances of Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain.
00:15:07 But that was, you know, 10, 15 years ago now.
00:15:10 And, you know, today you probably want to throw France in there too as well and probably a few other countries, you know, maybe even to some degree UK.
00:15:19 Is this a good place for us to be?
00:15:21 Well, you know, let's just kind of like continue on.
00:15:23 And so, you know, a fact.
00:15:26 So Europe is, let's be honest here, Europe is constrained on energy and resources.
00:15:32 Canada is abundant in energy and resources, including bulk water.
00:15:35 I mean, we always think about oil and gas, but, you know, there's bulk water and there's lumber and so forth as well.
00:15:41 So, it is undergoing very serious political strife these days.
00:15:46 Just think of France.
00:15:47 What's going on in France today?
00:15:49 You know, it's a little frightening in some regards.
00:15:53 And while some in Canada may indeed have hopes and aspirations of an EU-inclusive passport,
00:15:59 which we can, you know, just travel freely and so forth, that comes at a huge cost.
00:16:05 You know, I mean, the regulatory burden in the EU, many would argue, and I would and I would myself, is completely incongruent with oil and gas development in Canada.
00:16:17 And ultimately, if we had to adopt those regulations, it would stifle our own growth.
00:16:22 So, you know, why would we want to do that?
00:16:26 You know, kind of moving along as well.
00:16:28 So, if Mr. Carney is serious about Canada joining the EU in any way, shape, or form, I would argue that the EU would gain monetary and fiscal stability.
00:16:42 So, the EU would gain the monetary and fiscal stability by integrating Canada's cleaner balance sheet onto its own.
00:16:50 The EU would gain substantial energy and resource assets and revenue.
00:16:55 okay you know because we have it they don't um canada's economic growth may likely be hampered
00:17:02 by eu regulations as as we as we spoke earlier and we can't forget about that
00:17:06 so is the eu a prairie winner in such an environment um you know or what do we gain out of
00:17:13 it you know other than maybe access you know to different parts of europe um so this is where
00:17:20 some may question Mr. Carney's intent.
00:17:24 You know, does he really want that?
00:17:26 Especially if it's at the expense of tighter relations
00:17:29 with the United States,
00:17:31 who are our friends and have been our friends
00:17:34 to the South for decades.
00:17:38 So I'm thinking of a scene in a drawing room
00:17:45 of men and women,
00:17:46 and there's a woman who is actually interested in this guy over here,
00:17:52 but he's not taking a lot of notice.
00:17:54 So she pretends to flirt with a guy over here in the hope that he will suddenly,
00:17:59 you know, you call it statecraft.
00:18:02 Statecraft, yeah.
00:18:03 That is a great analogy, Nigel.
00:18:06 So therefore the other possibility is statecraft.
00:18:10 So is Mr. Carney merely using a closer association with the EU
00:18:15 and possibly China as well, as political theater, statecraft, get a better deal.
00:18:22 So this can include things like talks of buying Swedish Saab Gripens, if that makes sense.
00:18:30 I'm not sure that it does, you know, with talk of pipelines to the east and the west,
00:18:35 along with construction of ports in the east and the west to export energy overseas.
00:18:40 And while, you know, that may make sense for diversification, you know, the pipeline to the south is a lot shorter and easier to.
00:18:49 But you're not saying there's no business case?
00:18:50 I'm not saying there's no business case, although I would add that if the costs of the end product become so great, whether it's due to carbon capture or just like long transmission difficulties and getting approvals, it just becomes too expensive, then maybe there isn't a business case.
00:19:12 Well, come on, let's Mr. Trudeau pass on that.
00:19:15 Yeah, no, exactly.
00:19:16 I mean, I think there was a business case, but without a doubt at the time, the journalists could have made anything.
00:19:20 Yeah, especially to the east.
00:19:22 Yes.
00:19:23 You know, that would be probably the bigger one or the easier one to sell.
00:19:26 Is this all to obtain a better trade deal with the United States by providing artificial competitive bids?
00:19:35 You know, maybe.
00:19:36 So, and also during a U.S. midterm election cycle, which Mr. Trump lost, largely and quite spectacularly in some respects,
00:19:47 which some may say it's I mean it's unclear yet but some may say might leave them in a bit of a
00:19:51 vulnerable position um so you know is this statecraft is this theater basically to ultimately
00:19:58 lead to a much better deal with the United States than what we would have um received had we just
00:20:03 signed the first offer uh that came across our desks and obviously we don't know I mean it's a
00:20:09 big maybe um what's your spidey sir I mean then this gets a little you know obviously you know
00:20:16 tough, where on one hand, what makes sense to me is the second option, which is that this is
00:20:22 statecraft. And that's what makes sense. Because of course, I mean, like it's United States,
00:20:26 the largest, our largest trading partner, largest economy on the earth, and they're right to our
00:20:31 southern border. And it's not even that far. And so much of Canada's population is pretty much
00:20:36 within spitting distance of the US border. That's a much easier route, much easier sell.
00:20:41 um that's what makes sense that you know to what degree does it make sense for us to give up
00:20:47 sovereignty uh to the eu uh for us to ship goods much much farther distances to an economy that's
00:20:53 much weaker um you know i i don't know but here's the rub though uh how often do politicians you
00:21:01 know do what makes sense and that's where i get stuck all right well that's a very good point to
00:21:06 What everybody is hanging on your words here for is,
00:21:11 what do I do about my own investment profile?
00:21:16 Assuming everybody's got a particular plan,
00:21:18 now, how do you save yourself from going bust
00:21:22 given this particular dilemma at this particular time?
00:21:26 What would your advice be?
00:21:27 Yeah, it really hasn't changed all that much
00:21:29 over the years and even with this budget.
00:21:32 So, obviously, based on your own objectives
00:21:35 and your risk tolerances, as is the usual disclaimer.
00:21:40 You know, have enough cash and fixed income
00:21:42 to meet short-term liabilities.
00:21:44 So make sure you have that as a reserve.
00:21:47 You know, own good quality equities,
00:21:49 not just in Canada, but globally speaking,
00:21:51 in Canada, the United States, and abroad,
00:21:53 that you can live with for many, many, many years.
00:21:56 What about Brookfield?
00:21:58 That's a controversial idea.
00:22:00 Yeah, you probably don't want to give specifically.
00:22:02 Carry on.
00:22:02 Yeah, but short answer, probably.
00:22:04 Probably yes.
00:22:07 There's some risks in that one too, but the short answer is probably yes.
00:22:10 But then, you know, you want to hedge some of those risks by owning precious metals like gold bullion, silver bullion, because when you mix that together with equities, it actually reduces your overall risk.
00:22:21 And plus, it's on sale right now.
00:22:23 Gold and silver are both very much on sale today.
00:22:25 And then for people with a much higher risk tolerance that understand it, maybe even a small amount of Bitcoin.
00:22:32 You know, who knows?
00:22:32 because blockchain technology is being integrated
00:22:36 more and more into the global economy.
00:22:38 I was spooked by that recent incident 1.00
00:22:40 where apparently the North Koreans 0.65
00:22:42 got away with $6.5 billion in Bitcoin. 0.53
00:22:46 It's the same as every other previous hack.
00:22:49 It's never Bitcoin that gets hacked
00:22:51 and it wasn't this time either.
00:22:53 It was the exchange that got hacked.
00:22:55 This time it was Binance.
00:22:57 Years ago it was Mt. Gox.
00:22:59 And there's been a few.
00:23:01 But it's always the exchange that gets hacked.
00:23:03 It's not the actual Bitcoin.
00:23:05 So if you're self-custodying your Bitcoin in a reasonably stringent manner, generally you're fine.
00:23:13 So hold a little.
00:23:15 Well, if it meets your plan and you understand the risks, but maybe a little bit's not so bad.
00:23:22 The last thing I'll add on that is, you know, in the budget, specific to the budget,
00:23:27 I mean, there was definitely an allocation towards electrical infrastructure and just general infrastructure spending.
00:23:35 So investing potentially in infrastructure, especially electrical infrastructure, for the next number of years.
00:23:40 I mean, if the plan is to double electrical capacity by 2050, probably investing in that area is not a bad idea.
00:23:49 But not necessarily in natural gas generating plants.
00:23:53 Then what do you invest in?
00:23:56 if you want to take advantage of that.
00:23:58 Yeah, so copper.
00:24:01 So, for example, one of our holdings is actually raw copper.
00:24:03 We just own copper.
00:24:05 It's because whoever and whatever is done is probably going to involve copper.
00:24:10 So sometimes you can invest wisely in ways where you're not necessarily taking company-specific risk,
00:24:17 but you're investing, we call it in the picks and shovels or materials that go into projects no matter what.
00:24:22 But in general, short term, a lot of this electrical energy production will be driven by natural gas, save it for the next 10 years.
00:24:34 Longer term, call it 10 years plus, it's probably more likely it'll be delivered by nuclear.
00:24:40 Whether it's fission or fusion, that's a whole other argument, you know, down the way.
00:24:44 But initially, gas, longer term, nuclear.
00:24:49 So, a gambler's budget, funny thing going on with Europe that might turn out to be brilliant.
00:24:59 Either way, we could be in trouble, but this isn't the worst budget that you've ever seen?
00:25:06 No, as an investor, it's allowing capital to come, at least paving the path for capital to come back to Canada, private capital and global capital.
00:25:17 I like that.
00:25:18 And for the individual investor, think about what you're doing, but stay the course.
00:25:24 Don't overreact.
00:25:26 Don't overreact and don't be overexposed and have an absolute stringent risk management plan when you're investing.
00:25:34 So you're not overexposed to any one thing.
00:25:36 Because there's major execution risk in this budget.
00:25:39 If it is executed properly, things could be pretty good.
00:25:43 But if it fails, we're just going to be saddled with more and more debt.
00:25:49 Back to your initial opening statement from Proverbs.
00:25:56 This financial show just got religious.
00:25:58 Peter, thank you very much for coming in today.
00:26:00 It's been great to see you.
00:26:01 Your advice is always thought-provoking,
00:26:05 and people need to consider exactly what is going on here.
00:26:10 But I think what you've given us here is something that you might not have got
00:26:12 for the rest of the, what I call
00:26:14 the commentariat, all the people whose
00:26:16 job it is to write about this today
00:26:18 and something else tomorrow. You know, they do their best,
00:26:21 as do we, but
00:26:22 this is your
00:26:24 whole life, so thank you for sharing
00:26:26 your thoughts. Well, thank you for having me.
00:26:28 Always a pleasure.
00:26:30 For the Western Standard, I'm Nigel Hannaford.
00:26:42 You