In this episode of The Cory Morgan Show, host Cory Morgan sits down with Keith Wilson, a lawyer who has worked for Tamara Leach and was instrumental in fighting to keep her out of jail. They discuss the Alberta government's new citizens initiative legislation, as well as the independence movement in the province.
00:04:57.440But the size and geography of Switzerland, it offers a fantastic model actually in several ways for provinces in Canada, considering increased or total independence from the Federation.
00:05:07.540Allowing citizens to vote in a referenda isn't an abdication of duty by elected officials.
00:05:13.040Our politicians are supposed to reflect the will of the people rather than direct it.
00:05:17.220Controversial or divisive policies are best put straight to the electors rather than a small legislative chamber where self-interest and lobbyists can unduly influence decisions.
00:05:27.300While discussions about provincial independence continue to rage, let's not forget that
00:05:31.240referendums can apply to much more than independence. Premier Smith's Bill 54 opens
00:05:35.800the door for initiatives on everything from major infrastructure projects to potentially ending
00:05:40.140those stupid annual clock changes for daylight savings time. If referenda are bundled with
00:05:45.500multiple questions on one ballot, it can be efficient. It's not like you've got to vote
00:05:48.140every month. Going to the polls more often isn't a task anyways. It's a privilege. We should
00:05:52.680welcome it. Elitists, of course, they're going to clutch their pearls and howl and indignation is0.87
00:05:56.940the power to make change lands in the hands of the commoners. I'll let them. Populism, yeah,
00:06:02.120it can have drawbacks, but it's infinitely better than its counterpart, which is authoritarianism.
00:06:07.760All right. So yes, I see a few of the actually ideas, a couple of commenters, Lynn there,
00:06:12.120you know, it's good to see Paradoxie in there and Benny and Aaron and talking about a couple
00:06:17.940of things that could go on to a referendum ballot, an RCMP, whether the contract gets renewed or a
00:06:24.500provincial pension plan. These are the places that these are the sorts of things maybe let's put it
00:06:29.840in the hands of the people, take it out of the hands of those clowns that are sitting in the
00:06:32.620legislature. They're there for some stuff, give us some committee work, but we can take the big
00:06:35.720policies off their hands. So let's have bigger talks. Okay, and that's a separate bigger discussion
00:06:42.420when we're talking about when somebody can sit down from Kathleen saying when somebody can sit
00:06:45.240down with the indigenous and have a discussion with them. I know most chiefs are liberals,
00:06:48.540but there's so much misinformation. No, I don't want to sit with the chiefs. To hell with the
00:06:52.500chiefs. Screw the chiefs. They're self-interested bums, most of them. The corruption in that system
00:06:57.520is overwhelming. When I saw them yesterday throwing the paper up in a big flourish saying,
00:07:01.780we don't care what you think in the legislation. Well, I don't care what you think. No, I don't
00:07:04.940want to talk to chiefs. We shouldn't. We need to talk to the citizens on those reserves. You know,
00:07:08.100the ones who are living in squalor while the chiefs live in mansions. Those are the ones we
00:07:11.840want to talk to. But anyway, that's a different discussion I can have another time. Let's turn
00:07:15.880to somebody who's a little more sane than me, and that's our Sean Polzer. I'm afraid Dave's
00:07:20.720indisposed, and then you get to fill in on the spot for the news update today. That's what happens
00:07:25.360when you're a vice president, you get called into a lot of meetings. Yeah, the burden of responsibility
00:07:30.920rests heavily on Dave's shoulders. Exactly. I had to laugh at your comment about the Native
00:07:36.000chiefs uh given your experience uh i thought maybe uh your case had come up too maybe they
00:07:46.400well we'll deal with that yeah but uh i'll try to be that more subdued if it ends up in the courtroom
00:07:53.120sounds good so i hadn't thought of that maybe we can edit this later
00:07:59.200we're live oh yeah and they don't watch my show anyway so no just your tweeter yeah
00:08:06.000yeah they don't miss that so what's going on in the newsroom well you know it's uh kind of i would
00:08:11.520say a mid mid busy day so uh you know might be oil and gas and the oil patch here um earnings
00:08:18.880are coming up all through the week so we had synovus uh big thermal oil status player announced
00:08:24.320some layoffs undisclosed number of layoffs but they had to be reported to the provincial government
00:08:28.880because they were over 50. they're having their earnings report and agm in calgary here tomorrow
00:08:35.520Of course, they're in that big, you know, the glass tower, the one with no coroner office.
00:17:53.820And it was in 98, as you know, is arising from the Quebec referendum succession movement.
00:17:59.220And so the Supreme Court of Canada has laid out a legal pathway for a province to vote
00:18:05.480to declare itself to be independent, and then the steps that are necessary to complete the
00:18:10.340process of that province becoming its own country.
00:18:13.080And what's also unusual from an international norms perspective, from an Alberta perspective or Canadian perspective is Alberta is the only province that has put in every step of the way legislation, right from the Citizen Initiative Act, to allow citizens to petition the Alberta government to hold a referendum and referendum legislation to allow the referendum on independence to be held.
00:18:42.680So we have all the legal processes, you know, the car is built. Now everybody's trying to jump in and drive it. To your point about political parties, let's be clear. Alberta's history is very clearly set out. The patterns of our political, of what you have to do to form a government and what you have to do or what can happen for you to cause you to lose power and not be able to form a government.
00:19:11.240It's math. It's electoral math. And this group that's now arrived on the scene, and particularly with some force this week, what they call themselves is the Republican Party, the only two things that are going to come from that, and I realize these people are well intended, but we have to be realistic.
00:19:31.680The only two things that will come from that party is dividing the vote on the right, clearing the way for the NDP to become the next provincial government in 2027, which we don't want.
00:19:42.940No reasonable person should want that, in my view.
00:19:45.940And it will also weaken and reduce the chances of a successful referendum vote.
00:19:52.600You don't achieve this type of change ever through political parties.
00:19:57.880You do it through grassroots organizations.
00:20:00.280yeah absolutely i appreciate you clarifying that and i see from a questioner and i kind of want to
00:20:06.020you know pivot a little on i mean we're here in the opposition really rising up for the people
00:20:09.660who want the status quo and basically saying that it's impossible you can't do it and there's a few
00:20:14.740reasons they throw out we'll kind of cover you know one would be the indigenous issue uh some
00:20:19.840is uh some people claiming that king uh charles actually owns all the land which is a bunch of
00:20:23.780bologna it's getting ridiculous the extents that some are going to but one that's interesting
00:20:28.600One that's interesting, and Yellowhead Homestead, one of our commenters, kind of pointing it out, because some people said, well, you could vote to leave, but then you'd be locked back into the constitutional reforming formula, and then you'd need seven provinces and all that baloney.
00:20:41.640And no, in other words, it could never happen, and that's just not true.
00:20:45.940well let me hit that one um so look you know i've been a litigator for 30 years and i've had to deal
00:20:56.800with very complex multi-party agreements involving corporations and individuals and so on of varying
00:21:02.860degrees of sophistication and varying amounts of money and often many many millions of dollars so
00:21:08.300high-stakes stuff um when you're developing and the parties don't want to resolve things they're
00:21:14.800fighting, right? But you get them to the point where they actually resolve things and they get
00:21:18.480to move on. They still might hate one another, but they move on. So it's not uncommon to have
00:21:25.060to deal with complex matters and find ways for parties to reach agreements. But one of the things
00:21:30.520you always do as a lawyer or litigator in a situation like that, you don't leave a thing at
00:21:36.960the end, even though you hammer out the details of the deal. So in this instance, the details upon
00:21:42.860on which Alberta would become an independent country,
00:22:59.360But I don't see it any more challenging than many of the other complex, multi-party arrangements
00:23:05.320that I've been involved in resolving in my career.
00:23:08.640The only difference is this one involves 4 million Albertans and 40 million Canadians.
00:23:14.040Yeah, well, and the Clarity Act makes it clear that if a province votes on a clear question and it gets to the day past that, the rest of the country is obligated to negotiate.
00:23:24.480And in good faith, that's the part people are overlooking.
00:23:27.440So if they suddenly said, well, you can't actually do that, well, they're now they're already not negotiating in good faith.
00:23:32.600I think at that point, I mean, this is getting theoretical, but then if a province has a clear
00:23:37.100vote, that's where they're at the point of saying, well, we can, we're going to unilaterally go then.
00:23:40.660I mean, well, in the Supreme Court of Canada, Corey, because they did it kind of cryptically.
00:23:46.440It clearly anticipated in the Supreme Court of Canada reference decision of 1998, this scenario,
00:23:52.860the scenario where other provinces, First Nations or the federal government just don't want the
00:23:59.960province that's leaving to leave so they effectively scuttle the negotiations right
00:24:06.360and it's paragraph 155 of the agreement of the of the decision and and people should read it
00:24:12.720and it's particularly significant given what's going on south of our border with president trump
00:24:20.060and paragraph 155 essentially says if you carefully analyze it the effect of it is
00:24:26.660That if there are bad faith negotiations and some of the parties are not entering into genuine good faith negotiations as to the terms of the province leaving, then it does clear the way for unilateral international recognition.
00:24:45.080so other countries can say no these guys followed a lawful process now these other provinces first
00:24:52.460nations whoever are playing silly bugger and as a result we this other country or countries will
00:24:59.940give international recognition to the sovereignty to the uh to the new nation state of alberta
00:25:06.680And think, for example, Taiwan. Taiwan is part of the Constitution and within, according to China, to Beijing, is part of China. But the international community has decided, no, it's not. And they've given Taiwan, or most countries, not all, have given recognition to China.
00:25:26.000So there's an out here. The Supreme Court of Canada decision is a sophisticated roadmap. And I think the greatest challenge will actually be helping the sufficient number of Albertans to realize the advantages of a free and independent Alberta and the disadvantages of remaining in this oppressive, exploitive relationship.
00:25:56.000leadership we have with central Canada and the reoccurring liberal regimes.
00:26:02.640So, I mean, it's good to just keep clarifying. And I know that this discussion and battle will
00:26:07.220keep going with people who will just, they'll just make stuff up and they'll just say it can't
00:26:09.980happen. It can't happen, whatever. Rational people will move ahead, but, and a lot of people are
00:26:14.360excited. They want to move ahead due to the, I mean, I think it's a drawback and a strength at
00:26:19.180the same time, not having one central leadership, I guess, in a way. I mean, the power of the people
00:26:24.220can endure even if a group or a party comes and goes but how do individuals organize what can
00:26:29.120your average person do then because i mean to be honest if a vote was held tomorrow i very much doubt
00:26:34.220enough people would be ready to go if people really want independence they've got to help
00:26:39.040build that base of support what can people be doing then to do so well i think it's it's informing
00:26:45.180trying to become informed i mean one of the things i'm trying to do on social media and by doing
00:26:51.040interviews like this is help people have accurate information about the process it's a real and
00:26:56.940viable process it's not crazy talk it's it's actually in our law books um and having a
00:27:03.900discussion to lift the uncertainty about the details of how it would work and how their lives
00:27:09.440would be different in a free and independent Alberta versus remaining in the current relationship
00:27:14.620I think I was pleased, actually, when the premier announced the timeline yesterday.
00:27:22.200And I think it's a realistic timeline.
00:27:24.700The idea of holding a referendum vote this year, I think, is a fool's errand.
00:28:03.160because of the the the federal government owned the land in alberta the water the oil the fish
00:28:12.020prior to 1930 and they entered into treaties treaties six seven and eight where the first
00:28:19.140nations surrendered which is effectively all of the land mass they ceded it forever released it
00:28:24.400to the federal government in 1930 because there was concerns from particularly saskatchewan and
00:28:31.760Alberta about the unfairness that all the other provinces in Canada owned their resources at the
00:28:37.320time, but Alberta was a ward of Ottawa. So that hence became the 1930 Natural Resources Transfer
00:28:47.880Agreement that transferred all of the land in Alberta, the water and the oil and gas and natural
00:28:54.540resources and fish to the Alberta government to administer so any unoccupied non-settled land so
00:29:03.860if you didn't homestead it and didn't have the title it became crown land meaning Alberta crown
00:29:09.240land meaning owned by the Alberta government so there's so many people that seem to think crown
00:29:15.500immediately means federal crown and means the federal government that is simply not true it's
00:29:21.280not open. It's not a debate. It's not uncertain. It's crystal clear. There are literally hundreds
00:29:26.820and thousands of court cases that have ruled that have had to deal with that finding of fact. It's
00:29:33.400not in dispute. It's not controversial. You can't say the same thing for BC. British Columbia doesn't
00:29:41.040have the same treaties, doesn't have a 1930s natural resources transfer agreement. And then
00:29:46.780And on top of that, Lougheed got an amendment in 1982, Premier Lougheed, to the Constitution, Section 92A, to confirm that not only does Alberta own all of these resources, it has the rightful control over their exploitation and marketing and development.
00:30:07.380I imagine we're going to have our work cut out in the next year, you know, clarifying a lot of things.
00:30:11.660But that's the task, because I think people want to go.
00:30:13.620And a lot of their questions are genuine.
00:30:15.780wine. They're fair. I mean, your average person doesn't dig into treaties or the constitution
00:30:20.980and, you know, they need that interpreted. They got a lot on the go as it goes. So as we can clear
00:30:27.520that up, though, I can only see support for independence growing. I really can.
00:30:32.680I think so. I think to me, the math's clear. I mean, I have an advantage of my training and my
00:30:38.360career to see into what these details are. And it's obvious to me the benefits are so significant
00:30:47.240for Alberta to be a free and independent country. Right on. Well, I really appreciate you coming
00:30:54.100on to talk to us, Keith, and your work in general out there. You've been a good advocate for freedom
00:30:58.500on many levels. I see some of the commenters are recognizing your work and defending
00:31:02.560some people, Tamara and others in the past. Where can people find, you know, where you've
00:31:08.160been speaking up and what you're up to so they can clarify on these issues and see as you uh
00:31:11.980help keep people informed sure i'm pretty active on twitter or x and my handle is at i k wilson
00:31:20.380i k wilson uh so please follow me there i post regularly factual information i go hand to hand
00:31:28.000with some people to try and clarify some issues that people are either spreading misinformation
00:31:31.800about or or just genuinely confused about right on well thank you again for joining us
00:31:38.080Today, I know 15 minutes was just not enough to cover so much.
00:31:41.080But with that timeline now, we've got probably, you know, a year perhaps and a year and some to keep clarifying these things and making sure everybody comes into things well informed.