Western Standard - September 19, 2024


Conservatives are afraid to come out in the open for fear of career cancellation

Topics
Mentioned
Premier Danielle Smith Outlines Plan to Support Alberta Families JK Rowling calls out Calgary trans activist as a ‘bullying man’ not a ‘woman’

Episode Stats


Length

4 minutes

Words per minute

205.63

Word count

1,022

Sentence count

74

Harmful content

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Taylor Swift's endorsement of Sen. Kamala Harris could swing millions of votes in the upcoming midterm elections. Is it a good thing or a bad thing? Is it better to have a celebrity endorse a candidate or not? And how does it affect the outcome of the election?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Usually celebrity endorsements in elections, you know, they're not much of consequence and
00:00:04.020 they're disregarded with by most people. The case though with Taylor Swift's endorsement with Kamala
00:00:09.140 Harris is something different. I mean, Taylor Swift has hit a level of stardom that's unprecedented
00:00:14.740 in the amount of revenue she has. And of course, even more importantly, in her fan loyalty. I mean,
00:00:21.760 the self-styled Swifties who follow her, they're legion and they follow her with a cult-like
00:00:26.680 loyalty. Swift's endorsement of Harris won't change many votes among those who've already
00:00:30.900 made up their minds where they're going to make their mark in the ballot, but it could bring out
00:00:34.640 hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people to vote who would have stayed at home otherwise.
00:00:38.920 Those kinds of numbers can swing an election. I mean, we wish people were more moved by policies
00:00:45.180 than herd mentality, but that's not always the case. With left-leaning people dominating the
00:00:50.160 narrative from public figures, the public can start to feel inclined to drift towards what they feel
00:00:55.680 as a majority view, even if it really isn't the majority view, just the ones with the big pulpits.
00:01:00.940 That's why lawn signs are such a priority for political campaigns. It's not that candidates
00:01:04.480 need people to recognize their names so much as they want to create the impression that they're
00:01:07.960 enjoying popular support. If a cul-de-sac is dominated with signs from one particular candidate,
00:01:13.560 folks can be inclined to go with the flow and join their neighbors and vote that way.
00:01:17.620 There are many prominent people who are conservatives. You just don't hear from them very often.
00:01:22.140 The best way to tell if an actor in Hollywood, because there are a lot of conservatives in
00:01:25.460 Hollywood, but the way to tell if they're conservative is if you don't know what their
00:01:28.660 political leanings are. They keep it to themselves because it'll greatly reduce their casting
00:01:32.600 opportunities if they break ranks. The leftist actors never shut the hell up about it. Think
00:01:37.520 of it like vegans. I mean, vegans, they're a tiny minority, but they sure aren't a quiet one.
00:01:42.440 People with normal dietary habits don't feel compelled to announce it to the world at every
00:01:47.400 opportunity. Vegans, though, you can't get through more than five minutes with one before they find a
00:01:52.120 way to slip their veganism into a conversation. And if you looked at it only that way, you'd think
00:01:56.720 vegans must be the majority in the world if you measure it by who brings it up and who doesn't.
00:02:01.600 Conservatives win when they just come out and be conservative. And let's look at another example,
00:02:06.520 the recent release of the movie Reagan. Actors Dennis Quaid and John Voight are among the few
00:02:11.280 outspoken conservatives in Hollywood, and they happily took parts in the movie, celebrating one of the
00:02:15.780 greatest presidents of all time. Now, despite little to no hype from conventional media, the movie had a
00:02:21.600 fantastic opening weekend. Citizens were eager to watch it. So then the critics came out, and they
00:02:26.320 panned the film. And this is where things become more telling. There's a popular website for those
00:02:30.660 who might not be familiar. They're called Rotten Tomatoes. It aggregates film ratings, and it has two
00:02:34.220 types of ratings, the ratings from the critics and the ratings from the audiences. Reagan got positive
00:02:39.400 reviews from 21% of the critics. Terrible. The movie got an incredible 98% positive review, though,
00:02:46.760 from audiences. Yes, the people actually watching it loved it. The critics are trying their worst or
00:02:51.540 their best to make it look terrible. They couldn't convince people, though, that a fantastic movie is
00:02:56.300 a bad one. The critics are part of the establishment, and the establishment in our culture roars,
00:03:00.900 swings left. They're in the fringe, though, and we should make a note of that. Look a little closer to
00:03:05.820 home here. The trajectory of Ralph Klein. He was one of the most popular premiers of all time in
00:03:10.300 Canada during his time in office. The establishment relentlessly attacked Klein. Pundits assured us he
00:03:15.620 was committing suicide politically when he told the unions to go to hell and shrunk government.
00:03:20.720 Klein then won a bigger majority. Some critics howled when he continued to cut the budgets,
00:03:25.120 and Klein won an even larger majority. The only time when Klein started to lose support was when he
00:03:30.080 started getting tired and throwing money at problems rather than standing up for taxpayers. That's when
00:03:34.420 he was encouraged to go to pasture by his own party. You know, I've heard so many times when I have
00:03:39.320 candid conversations with business leaders, politicians, and others saying, I wish I could
00:03:44.260 have said that when they're talking about something I said on X or something I wrote in a column.
00:03:48.360 Well, guess what? They can say that. In fact, they must say that. What's that? Pretty much anything
00:03:54.580 unapologetically conservative. They don't have to be as abrasive as I am about it. In staying silent,
00:04:00.280 or quietly speaking of conservative principles as if they're something to be ashamed of,
00:04:03.880 prominent conservatives are allowing a minority of leftists to own public discourse. When conservatives
00:04:09.720 dodge questions on conservative stances, it makes them look sneaky and implies there's something wrong
00:04:14.880 with their stance. Call for small government, guys. Call out the unions. Don't shy away from the need to
00:04:20.780 cut spending and lay off useless bureaucrats. Don't be afraid to say we can't handle the current volume of
00:04:27.160 immigrants. Point out the utter failure of the Indian Act and the reserve system. Try this one. 1.00
00:04:31.820 Call a man a man and a woman a woman. Yeah, crazy, isn't it? It's common sense principles. And when 0.96
00:04:37.720 conservatives own them, the voters reward it. Come out of the closet and be who you are. A
00:04:42.760 conservative. You'll feel so much better being yourself in the open without shame or apologies.
00:04:49.020 And that's how, guys, we can swing the needle from the false discourse that makes it sound like that
00:04:54.500 we're all left-leaning. We aren't. It's just the minority of loud leftists.