00:10:02.980Well, if they're hardworking, productive people, yes.
00:10:06.620Then we got a report going to City Council today that because of the infrastructure repair needs that were ignored by Nenshi and Gondek, we're now facing a $610 million bill to fix up infrastructure.
00:14:21.960So I guess just to get a bit of a background, I, I, I remembered from at the time when you
00:14:27.160were there. For a short time, you were the head of the Alberta Human Rights Commission. And it's,
00:14:34.460well, basically, you got cancelled. Yeah, yeah, exactly. I got cancelled. I think in part,
00:14:41.340it was because I was interested in making some changes there. The Alberta NDP, who knew me
00:14:47.520personally, didn't want me to do that. And so they came up with their series of smears to get me out.
00:14:55.120but um my you know that was my goal uh i was in there to make some changes to make some important
00:15:01.760changes uh and now they didn't get done uh so that's that's that's too bad but uh happy to
00:15:07.880talk about what i would see is uh something that needs to be done with some of these commissions
00:15:11.620absolutely so i mean you're a lawyer there were other things you could have been doing with
00:15:17.120yourself but you chose to join the human rights commission i can only presume uh you felt though
00:15:21.940you could do some good. What purpose did you see then in human rights commissions? What good could
00:15:26.820they have been providing for the province when you joined it? Well, I mean, I had a background
00:15:33.160in some of these similar areas, complaints, tribunals, that sort of thing. I was involved
00:15:38.780in trying to reform professional regulators, which is another topic similar to human rights
00:15:43.820commissions. And I thought that, you know, we could do some work with the commission as well
00:15:47.980to improve procedural fairness, especially, because a lot of the issues that we're seeing,
00:15:53.480including with the Neufeld case in BC, do come down to whether or not these commissions are
00:15:57.680actually procedurally fair. And so I wanted to make some changes there. I have a lot of background
00:16:02.160in that. And that was why I was hoping to do what I was hoping to do there.
00:16:07.300So there must be some guidelines, you know, so I'll kind of circle this back to the recent case
00:16:13.720that's really kind of got a lot of, well, there's a couple recently that got people worked up.
00:16:17.380one's in BC, one's in Ontario. One, I'm just talking to the extent of the penalty laid against
00:16:23.480a person, $750,000, which I can only guess this man is going to appeal this somewhere to a proper
00:16:31.460court because it just seems beyond the pale. But are there any limitations on these commissions
00:16:36.000on the possible penalties they could lay on people? Not really. No, I mean, that's the thing.
00:16:41.520And now, generally, they're in the lower range, 20,000, 10,000, you know, I think the highest in Alberta when I was chief still was about 40,000, 50,000.
00:16:53.340But there isn't an actually upper limit.
00:16:56.340Now, the courts reviewing these can say, yeah, you've gone way too high here, which I'm hoping, even if, you know, whether the courts uphold, you know, the determination on the substance,
00:17:07.500hopefully uh they will review this and say this award is way uh out of out of the range of the
00:17:15.520plausible especially for an individual uh because there is a sort of a common law duty to be fair
00:17:20.600to the respondent uh and this case just isn't there's this this is uh i mean they don't they
00:17:26.040haven't even identified the people who will be receiving the money yet that so we don't even
00:17:30.960have actual complainants uh who will be receiving the money it's just a broad class which i think
00:17:35.900it is completely inappropriate for this sort of award.
00:17:40.800Yeah, and that's another point that's interesting
00:17:42.820is that the complainants can be quite well rewarded