00:17:10.860We had our first member crossing the floor three, four weeks ago.
00:17:14.900The former Natural Resource Minister, Maïté Blanchet-Vizna, came over and joined us.
00:17:19.520So we're present now in the National Assembly.
00:17:21.620If there were an election today, according to the latest polls, we would have somewhere between 10 and 14 members in the National Assembly.
00:17:28.340We'd actually have the balance of power in a minority government.
00:17:31.520So it's not too bad for a start after only four or five years.
00:17:35.340I can tell you that Conservatives are back in Quebec
00:17:38.260and they're going to be back in the National Assembly
00:17:40.820in significant numbers on October 5th.
00:17:43.700So that balancing, as you pointed out, with Scott Moe, Premier Smith,
00:25:56.100We also want to give greater access to healthcare by adding the contribution of the private sector.
00:26:04.100We do believe that it's time to have an open debate about private health care in Canada and in Quebec and talk about the Canadian Health Act.
00:26:13.340We think it's important to, you know, the current model is not sustainable neither.
00:26:19.820I mean, we're putting more and more money every year and the results are not there and the winning lists keep going higher and higher.
00:26:26.480Other than that, we also want to exploit our natural gas, as I said earlier on.
00:26:32.280we need to create wealth stop depending on alberta's transfer payments money um so it's
00:26:38.760the kind of policies and and of course and that's why we came up with the book uh lately and of
00:26:43.800course increase quebec's power within the canadian constitution uh the confederation and and for us
00:26:51.880that's uh that's that center because the other parties the liberals you know they're the liberals
00:26:57.640provincial or federal. They love centralization. They love abusing provincial powers. The
00:27:04.520separatists, they just want to break up the country. They don't want to do a good deal,
00:27:07.640a better deal for Quebecers. And we're positioning ourselves in between.
00:27:12.040Great. So, I mean, those cooperative efforts, if it was a minority government,
00:27:16.360and perhaps you're in the balance of power, you know, I know you're campaigning to win.
00:27:21.640I imagine that'd be the sort of thing, could we have some sort of summit with premiers,
00:27:24.920There's things to put that pressure on from multiple provinces rather because we come in as 10 individuals rather than five or six together.
00:31:06.500Well, there you have it, folks. Conservatives do exist in the province of Quebec and do have, you know, some degree of support. And Mr. DeHemp, I think, speaks with good common sense and things. And, you know, I'll have those interviews. I mean, I would like to see, say, for example, an independent Alberta, an independent Quebec, kind of as Roadsend, one of the commenters just said, you know, Canada's too large to govern and we need independence in all the provinces. I fully agree with that.
00:31:33.380But, I mean, I don't wish ill on Quebecers.
00:31:36.980Get somebody like Mr. DeHemmin and start developing your natural gas.
00:37:50.180I did go out to see those people on the highway working their butts off in city areas, getting people, giving them the finger, all of that on their own time as volunteers, following the rules, only to have opponents now questioning the legitimacy of their work, their petitioning because of what Parker's group and the Centurion Clowns did.
00:38:15.160they undercut so much trust and yes it's being unfair to lump that on that I've seen no evidence
00:38:23.400and I don't believe for a second that Parker's access to the list had anything to do with the
00:38:29.880petition signatures going in that's a clean petition all the volunteers the others it's fine
00:38:35.040and you know to be verified uh some people wondering about that you know how does that
00:38:39.420work with elections Alberta and so on with other petitions whether it was your petitioning to run
00:38:44.280for office or petitioning for a referendum or things like that. They will bring in, they don't
00:38:50.520check every single one of them. First thing though, they will check a whole pile of them against the
00:38:54.940electors list. That's just their way to make sure these people exist. You can't just make up an
00:38:58.640address. You need to kind of cross-reference. And they won't do it with all of them, but they'll do
00:39:01.980it with a lot. On top of that, they will actually phone a bunch of them. They'll follow up. They'll
00:39:10.120say, pardon me, sir, this is Elections Alberta. We're just calling. We'd like to just confirm
00:39:14.560that you did sign a petition. And if say they checked on 10,000 signatures, let's just say,
00:39:23.280I'm just throwing a number out there. And they found that 90% of the signatures were validated,
00:39:29.340they were good, everything else. They will reduce 10% from the petitioning number and put the
00:39:35.960petition in as it is. See, that's what happened with Lukasik's 400 and some thousand. If people
00:39:44.080remember when he put it in, it was 440,000 or something like that. Elections Alberta, when
00:39:48.120they did follow up on that, found about a 13% error rate. And those errors could be all sorts
00:39:51.800of things. It doesn't mean corruption or bad things, but it does mean that, you know, maybe
00:39:56.100there were names that couldn't be read or addresses that were wrong or people, again, that just
00:40:01.840weren't on the list. So they kind of did that. And then they sucked about 40,000 signatures off
00:40:05.860of their total. That's how Elections Alberta works with those things. And that's what'll happen
00:40:11.720with this one. But with 301,000 signatures, and I've seen how meticulous and careful people were
00:40:17.220with getting them, I'd be surprised if more than 5% even, it turns out to be the number they take
00:40:22.380off at. There's no way it's going to be knocked down below 178,000. The only thing that could be
00:40:27.780add, you know, overall with this and problematic is if they found one of the salted names
00:40:35.460in a petition. And I'll explain that a bit because not everybody necessarily understands
00:40:40.620how these electoral lists work. Okay. And I don't see why they'd find one of those salted names.
00:40:44.440Again, the State Free Alberta has been on the up and up all the way through. So it shouldn't be a
00:40:48.840problem. When Elections Alberta gives out the information to political parties, they give out
00:40:57.360the voter list to every political party. They salt the list. They will have some fake names in there.
00:41:03.120They'll have some other identifiers in there that are unique only to that list. And if that name
00:41:09.960pops up anywhere else, you know where the list came from. So what has happened, and I will say
00:41:16.620that not allegedly, what has happened is that salted names appeared in the database that the
00:41:25.080Centurion project put out for, and again, for people to publicly access that information.
00:41:30.680That's another level of the problem with this. They found those unique salted names. The only
00:41:36.740possible way those names could show up in the Centurion database is that it had an electors
00:41:42.440list in it. That's confirmed. Now, Mr. Parker, I guess, can make his defense as to how that ended up
00:41:48.100in his database. We'll see, I guess, what happens with that. But it was in there. That's why the
00:41:53.720injunction was served so quickly because they could show the evidence for the elections of
00:41:58.040Alberta say, look, we logged into this site. We typed in a few of these names and bang, we got
00:42:02.460hits. The other thing it proves is where it came from. So they know there's no denying that this
00:42:10.400list came from the Republican party of Alberta. Cam Davies has some questions to answer. Was it
00:42:16.680stolen from them? Did they sell it? Was it hacked? Was it given away? I don't know, but it did come
00:42:25.060from there. That's confirmed too. And it's problematic. It really is. What I think it's
00:42:31.780going to lead to, I think the government's going to change the legislation. This happened in Calgary
00:42:35.880with the municipal elections as well. They used to give the electors lists to all the candidates
00:42:38.880until some crackpot candidates started making bad use of the list. There was a guy who was talking
00:42:44.340about sharing information about people who worked in health services from the list and giving their
00:42:49.380addresses out in public. So then because of that nut, they just took away those lists from
00:42:54.000politicians altogether. I won't be surprised if these lists get pulled out of the political
00:42:58.260realm provincially altogether too eventually. Just nobody will have it anymore. Whatever.
00:43:03.640But for the immediate term, those lists were leaked wrongly.
00:43:12.280And I just can't say it enough, guys, to try and compare it to a phone book is dismissive.
00:43:24.780There's some public people who keep their locations very discreet.
00:43:28.260They try very hard because they do have nutcases out there coming after.0.93
00:43:33.480them. Now, I conclude myself in that. You should see some of the emails I get. I don't want people
00:43:37.680easily finding my house. And I understand they have other ways they can find it and whatever.
00:43:42.740There's ways to get people's addresses. But when you're entrusted with a list like that, it doesn't
00:43:47.080matter if that information is available somewhere else. You were responsible for that bloody list.
00:43:52.280So how are we supposed to trust a movement when there's a whole bunch of people who say, well,
00:43:55.820I don't care if somebody's personal information got leaked out and they may come to harm from it.
00:44:00.120An analogy I used on X not long ago, would you guys be okay if, again, so let's say Mitch Sylvester became the president of an independent republic of Alberta, and then people shared what his address was?
00:44:12.920It's the same thing, and it's wrong, because there will be crazy people going after Mitch.
00:44:19.320When you see these violations happen, don't try to dismiss them. Try to look at how it might apply to you and your side.
00:44:25.760That's what it comes to when people are talking about allowing the government to violate free speech or things like that.
00:44:31.800When it's an authoritarian sort of law, even if it's your side, always imagine a government that's not on your side having that power.