00:10:37.600but i don't have a solution necessarily i mean the amount of resources to actually clear an area
00:10:42.040like that would be massive environmentalists would go nuts if they saw clear-cut logging in an area
00:10:46.820that visible yeah and uh to have a controlled burn the chances of going out of control would
00:10:51.700be huge i'm just saying anyways i wouldn't buy a cabin out that way right now that's for sure
00:10:55.620i don't blame it that's about all i have for the time being cory so we kind of a slow morning but0.96
00:10:59.840hopefully it's going to be picking up here later oh i'm sure something stupid will happen for you
00:11:02.720guys to be scrambling in the newsroom hope so well right on well thanks for the update appreciate it
00:11:07.500i guess i'll be seeing you on the pipeline i guess so yeah or i guess that's an hour or two
00:11:10.940yeah right on sounds good all right thanks all right and yes it was the substitute dave he does
00:11:16.220a great job though isn't he and uh yeah the reason we've got all that going on in the newsroom and
00:11:21.340those stories are coming out in real time is because you guys have been subscribing so this
00:11:25.180is where i gotta rattle the cup and nag and remind you guys you know we need your help to stay
00:11:30.700independent it's ten dollars a month hundred dollars for a year take part it's just like an0.55
00:11:35.580an old newspaper subscription and it keeps us rolling. So if you haven't subscribed yet, you
00:11:39.200know, go to westernstandard.news slash subscription and take one out. Buy one for your liberal uncle
00:11:43.600driving bananas. You know, there's lots of things you can do with a subscription. And if you've
00:11:47.620already subscribed, thank you very much, guys. I really do appreciate it. So, you know, there is a
00:11:54.320lot happening out there as always. Let's just have a quick peek. A couple of the folks in the
00:12:00.200comments. Scroll. Good to see Paradoxy, Jacqueline and LZ and GP folks coming from northern Alberta.
00:12:06.880Those areas, you know, again, where you get some of that fire risk and forest management things,
00:12:10.100things we got to look at. You know, it's difficult to come up with solutions. And hey,
00:12:15.560things are getting drier. They are getting hotter. I mean, we got a much larger debate about how much
00:12:21.080degree humans are causing that to happen or how much of it might be natural cycles or whatnot.
00:12:26.460But come on, you know, I'm getting a little long in the tooth.
00:12:29.600And I do remember as a kid who grew up in Banff and a guy who spent 20 years surveying in the bush, we didn't see burns going on 20, 30 years ago like we're seeing today.
00:12:38.620And there could be a number of factors.
00:12:40.180These are things we should be talking about.
00:12:41.300As Dave was saying, some of it is how much is it have we dropped the ball on management?
00:12:45.000How much have we let tinder build up in these forested areas?
00:12:48.520But there's a little more going on, too.
00:12:50.300And it's that hot and dry consistently.
00:12:52.060it makes for for uh much more problematic issues of these things getting lit in the first place
00:12:56.880and trying to fight them once they do get rolling so uh we'll be watching let's just hope they get
00:13:03.080things under control in bc i mean it's been terrible over there uh some of the awful awful
00:13:07.260scenes there was a one on the western standard showing a video clip though of some cattle that
00:13:12.460thankfully did escape the fire and narrowly got out of it check it out of the western standard for
00:13:16.440that but you know wildlife and and a lot of things suffer really terribly in these fires and
00:13:21.380and it's awful. So we'll see what we can do about it. Speaking of stability, yes, Canada
00:13:27.440is in more unstable than ever. And that kind of leads into the guest I'll be speaking to
00:13:31.440in a moment. I just wanted to note one thing I saw in a poll as a, well, a person like me who
00:13:36.440likes to stir up the federalism pot. The Parti Quebecois is poised now, as far as polling is
00:13:42.620concerned, to win a majority in this fall's election. I mean, it was looking like a minority
00:13:46.180for a while but they're still gaining they changed leadership in quebec with others thought maybe
00:13:52.100you're looking at a minority position the pq now is is is looking to potentially win this fall in
00:13:56.900quebec and their mandates to hold a referendum again uh something's got to change in canada
00:14:03.160what's fundamentally wrong with it why are provinces tearing themselves apart from every
00:14:06.920direction maybe mr randy royer has some answers on some of that hey thanks for joining us in studio
00:14:11.820today nice to see you cory thanks for having me yeah so i mean you maybe just kind of introduce
00:14:16.540yourself you've written some uh guest columns people are familiar with you but uh you know
00:14:21.100who are you who am i um so i'm uh raised born in wetasquin actually raised in uh raised in
00:14:27.100lesbridge and uh and i've kind of long been possessed by the concept of western alienation
00:14:33.900and spent much of my adult life trying to figure it out and i got involved with national politics
00:14:39.580and uh and have got lots of lots of uh views and lots of perspectives that are somewhat unique
00:14:47.020because uh because of my political aspect you know political work and i've written three books
00:14:53.580on the subject um over the years starting in 2007 actually uh predicted the uh what was going to
00:14:59.660happen with the progressive conservatives that they were going to lose to a third party which
00:15:04.860ended up actually happening and then another book that was uh i think the top 10 reasons why
00:15:09.820alberta doesn't fit in this canada and then the most recent one is alberta should lead not leave
00:15:16.300which is a phrase quoted many times by politicians it has been quite popularized now yes um so your
00:15:24.540new podcast getting it out there and that gets to the fundamentals of you know because we're kind of
00:15:28.620seeing i think a national crisis emerging different parts of the country and you delve into with your
00:15:33.980your nation of people podcast uh sort of the the history the more recent history and and what's
00:15:38.700pulled us together what's it all about well um the podcast is is fundamentally about empowering
00:15:44.100people and so um you know my personal belief is that uh democracy is about people empowerment
00:15:50.520that the government should work for them not the other way around and uh and so what we're trying
00:15:55.020to do is we're trying to give people an education so we're you know we we refer back to history how
00:16:00.020we got to where we are and we will be in the future episodes we're inviting people on and
00:16:06.360we'll get their perspectives and then what we're doing in this it's a 20 episode podcast and and
00:16:12.040we're taking kind of a business plan approach to what should Alberta do and so we're looking at
00:16:17.500the foundations of you know what got it like I said what got us here but the idea is that we
00:16:23.740will look at the options we will game out those options kind of model out what happens if we do
00:16:29.460A, B, C, or D. And my personal opinion is that with what's happening in Quebec and what's
00:16:37.080happening here in Alberta, the country's either going to go one of two ways. It'll either fall
00:16:41.600apart and balkanize, or it could potentially be a cathartic moment where we actually get our act
00:16:48.160together and grow up. Well, we'll see. And certainly, I think we're at a turning point.
00:16:52.260I think everybody's kind of feeling that. Things have come to a head. So your first couple of
00:16:56.860episodes and you were talking a lot about the 1982, uh, you know, patronizing repatriation
00:17:02.560of the constitution, uh, and, and Pierre Trudeau's, uh, you know, part in all of that.
00:17:08.680Uh, what did you go into with those episodes?
00:17:11.300Well, first of all, uh, you know, I contest the word repatriation because we didn't have
00:17:16.240a codified constitution before it was a British parliamentary.
00:17:19.660We had a British parliamentary system, which drives you to common sense and, um, and, and
00:17:26.020compromise versus uh a codified constitution which is an american concept which we imported
00:17:33.700and that drives you to litigation and adversarial approach so talking about the uh the the i'm gonna
00:17:41.620dive into this but now i'm talking about the the wnba yes and what a crap show that has turned into
00:17:48.100you know the the uh trans translation reminds me of a story about and this was years ago
00:17:53.860that a female reported it happened in two places boston and winnipeg and in boston uh the female
00:18:01.040reporter wanted to get into a change room and this is you know years ago and she couldn't wouldn't
00:18:06.660let in be the team wouldn't let her in because she was a female and it was a men's sport and so
00:18:11.760she took it to court and it became this big constitutional issue there's all this huge
00:18:16.520litigation it got all over the all over the place and it would just become a mess and finally you
00:18:22.360the judge decided one side of the other i don't remember what happened as opposed to in winnipeg
00:18:29.000same thing happened that a female reporter wanted to get into the the men's locker room and it goes0.98
00:18:34.760in front of the judge and the judge said this is stupid it shouldn't be in court you guys go and0.96
00:18:39.400figure out something reasonable and get out of my face that was pre-1982 constitution so that was0.97
00:18:46.040canada that had common sense and made and and had logic and it let people find compromise uh versus
00:18:53.640when we adopted the american system that's all gone and that's what i'm trying to point out
00:18:58.520in in our discussion about uh about the about in the podcast yeah well things going so much
00:19:05.160into the courts now being litigated uh not only you know i mean there's many questionable rulings
00:19:11.720i think that are coming from it but the time frame we can't address issues in a timely manner
00:19:17.000anymore these things take years to get through the system when again we just don't seem to have
00:19:21.960the capability of a judge to put his or her foot down and say come on get out of my courtroom you're
00:19:25.640wasting my time or at least you know let's get this done fast well the instructions to the judges
00:19:31.480changed in 1982. suddenly they had this constitution that they had to refer to and you know there's
00:19:37.160different ways they could approach it you know it's called originalism what did the what did
00:19:40.760the authors think or it's called they call it the living tree i call it the judicial advocacy
00:19:45.720but they can kind of make up their own story and and things like you know bike lanes that are now
00:19:51.400becoming constitutional charter rights uh and you know in british columbia one judge said that
00:19:57.480uh it was a constitutional right to do hard drugs in playgrounds you know like crazy stuff that and
00:20:03.400then it and then as you said it takes years to actually for the supreme court to decide whether
00:20:08.520they agree with the lower courts or not and so we get stuck in this mess one of the problems is
00:20:14.040the canadian judicial system was never built for this kind of adversarial approach and that it and
00:20:21.080it was never built to be the extreme you know the supremacist supreme position in in our democracy
00:20:26.760and so it's never caught up whereas in the us you go to court and you're in and out within six
00:20:31.400months to a year in canada it's two three years well and then this living tree though just used
00:20:37.240to be growing like a weed in a lot of bad ways. It was at the 2004 Haida decision. I mean, people
00:20:42.760assume that consultation, for example, is entrenched in the constitution when it comes
00:20:46.280to indigenous people. And no, it's not actually. That work doesn't appear anywhere there. But the
00:20:50.280justice ruling in 2004 brought in the obligation to consult based on respecting treaties. That was
00:20:58.280read in though. That wasn't part of the constitution, but now it becomes considered a constitutional
00:21:02.760right that's right and now that's starting to evolve into consent rather than consultation
00:21:09.080and we have this animal that just makes things more and more difficult to deal with
00:21:13.160uh but also we can't seem to reform our constitution in any other sort of way
00:21:17.800either so how do we deal with the impasses that we come well two quick things one is you talked
00:21:22.440about the forest fires well the simple reality is the forest fires have been hit by two things one
00:21:27.560One is the tariffs to the US, when Trump was complaining about the smoke coming down,
00:21:34.120I thought to myself, you know what, why don't we cut our trees down, sell them to the United
00:21:38.840States without tariffs, bring down your housing costs, and we'll be able to manage our forests
00:31:36.380I mean, they've been struggling for a long time, I think, for the WNBA to kind of try and get into the massive viewer base for the NBA.0.92
00:31:43.280But now we've got this whole woke fiasco kind of coming in.
00:31:46.400And, you know, I think this is just my view, as I've demonstrated, I'm certainly not a WNBA expert, but all of this attention being drawn on the league and some of the characters within it, the players within it and things like that, this ridiculousness of, you know, the potential men coming into the draft or playing in the league and so on.
00:32:06.280I hope they just rule with common sense and say, that's enough.
00:32:14.900But that whole discussion has shown such a spotlight on it that, you know, there's that many more new viewers and this league can continue to grow and be entertaining and good for people.1.00
00:32:24.680But if they go the wrong way, if they really are that woke, they really are that stupid.1.00
00:32:28.160And I'm afraid, you know, we can't underestimate the stupidity of people anymore.1.00
00:32:36.160I mean, really, you know, I wasn't kidding around that much about, you know, what would it look like if a couple of those guys, these former NBA players who were jokingly putting their names forward into the draft, what if one of these team owners, you know, says, you know what?
00:32:49.120Yeah, I'm going to draft one or both of them.
00:32:51.700And they get out on the court and the floor with these women.0.97
00:32:54.300They're going to knock them around like, you know, I'm not saying these men are necessarily violent or anything, but you can't play around that discrepancy between them.0.76
00:33:00.980It would turn into a novelty sideshow for, what, a few games into the season, and that would probably be the end of the league.
00:33:10.280So I hope they're thinking harder.1.00
00:33:12.560But it's really brought not just the league into the spotlight, but the utter stupidity of the trans ideology and what it's got to at this point.1.00
00:33:22.280You know, an individual wants to identify as another gender.1.00
00:33:26.860You know, dress up, get surgery, do the works, marry somebody.1.00
00:33:29.340of it. Fine. I don't care. By all means, I hope it makes you happy. I hope it's good and you can
00:33:34.700lead as functional a life as possible. If a person comes up, presents as a, you know, a female, a male
00:33:40.160prefers to be called out of respect. I typically will. The gender ID you want to give, but we still
00:33:48.040have to put limitations on things to reflect reality. As I mentioned in the monologue,
00:33:53.940there was an American prison where a number of prisoners got pregnant. In other words, the man
00:33:58.600they put in with the women prisoners wasn't just, you know, this wasn't somebody who had surgery and
00:34:03.140had the nuts and berries cut off or anything like that. This was a fully functional man with all the
00:34:07.420parts and clearly a straight one. Likewise, a battle in British Columbia over a women's shelter,
00:34:14.900women's shelter, women who had been assaulted by presumably a man most often, and they're trying
00:34:21.320to feel somewhere safe to recover, to rebuild, to get on with life. And these woke arseholes0.98
00:34:26.900put men in with them, put men in with them, and made it a legal battle to put men in with these1.00
00:34:33.960vulnerable, already victimized women. That's how sick the woke ideology is. So if the prisons and0.98
00:34:43.780women's shelters weren't enough to bring common sense in, well, it's sad that that wasn't enough,0.95
00:34:48.000but maybe the WNBA will be what it takes to make people realize this is getting ridiculous.0.52
00:34:55.500us. All right. Let's have a look into how well our federal government is spending our money. Let's
00:35:01.180just pivot a little bit, you know, some happy news. This one's in the Western Standard. The
00:35:05.280Senate Speaker, her name is Raymond Gagne. I don't know. I can't pronounce some French names.
00:35:13.040You know, says so much. Who knew what the name of the Speaker was in the first place? Nobody.
00:35:19.900Because it's the Senate. They don't do anything. They're useless. It's a patronage pit. It's just
00:35:23.980somewhere you stick people because you owe them a political favor. They get a good pension and
00:35:29.120don't have to work very hard and get a massive salary. Well, she has billed taxpayers for $875,000
00:35:37.660for international travel. The Taxpayers Federation found this since she was appointed three years ago.
00:35:44.720$300,000 in travel. I mean, this is on top of all the hundreds of thousands they take out of us and
00:35:48.880everything else. 300,003 years for a person that nobody in Canada has ever heard of, much less
00:35:56.400anybody overseas. What purpose do we have to send a senator out of Canada, the Speaker of the Senate?
00:36:05.500None. This is just more of the gravy train for them. And how on earth, what sort of five-star
00:36:11.280hotels and platinum treatment are you getting to run up a bill like that? And you know what
00:36:16.020the consequences are going to be for her for that? None. Nothing. We're continuing to take it up the
00:36:22.460keister, guys. This country is ripping you off. Your work, your taxes, the stuff you see coming
00:36:27.520out, this is what it goes towards. This is what it goes towards. You know, even the prime minister,
00:36:32.080when he has, what, single flights where there's a hundred and some thousand just in food costs,
00:36:35.980so he can treat all his friends to the most expensive of possible foods.
00:36:40.560but at least i understand why a prime minister has to travel i understand why a prime minister
00:36:47.040can't fly coach i understand why it'll cost more than your typical flight though that's still
00:36:51.720above and beyond and it's ridiculous but i can understand that there's no damn reason
00:36:56.840the speaker of the senate should be costing over 300 or just under 300 000 a year for travel
00:37:04.320expenses come on for international travel that's not just flying back and forth the senate because1.00
00:37:09.280she represents somewhere else. No, this is just international travel alone. But nothing will0.97
00:37:14.420happen, nothing will come of it. Speaking of nothing happening, we're getting a little darker
00:37:17.600here. And speaking of our bad courts and our ridiculous rulings from them. The Edmonton0.89
00:37:24.980Police Service, they've warned us that Jamie Edward Meads, he's 38, he's considered a significant
00:37:30.500risk of harm to the community. Yeah, he should be because he's got a 20-year history of rape
00:37:37.120and assault. He's had eight known victims identified during that period. He was convicted
00:37:43.980of assault by bodily harm when he choked, suffocated, strangled, and aggravated assault
00:37:49.320and forcible confinement. Intimidation all against a woman last year. 2025. Just a little over a year
00:37:56.320ago. He's loose again. Do you think he might re-offend? And you see, this isn't a shoplifter.
00:38:03.160This isn't somebody who's going to do minor harm. This isn't a car thief. He's a rapist and a woman beater. So why do they keep releasing him? Because he's indigenous. Look into it. He's a Gladue case. What's a Gladue case? That's the geniuses in our court system.
00:38:20.260They ruled in the Gladue ruling, who I believe she was with the Niska or Cowichan or one of those bands.0.98
00:38:26.860Either way, whereas Indigenous offenders must, the judges have to take their race into account and give them reduced sentences whenever possible.0.97
00:38:39.060In this case, it shouldn't be possible.1.00
00:38:40.720A judge should be able to say, I don't care about the Gladue principles.
00:41:18.520I believe in castle law and those sorts of principles.
00:41:21.720But still, in an organized society, the state should have a degree of policing and law enforcement.
00:41:29.640And not everybody is capable or willing, you know, to have the firearms required or ability to fully protect their household or themselves.
00:41:36.980and that's where as a society I think we should try and manage to again protect those liberties
00:41:44.720of people as much as humanly possible but one of the obligations of the state though is that
00:41:49.520management of those things we can't go into a full free-for-all either uh you know I I I do
00:41:56.180as I said I'm quite libertarian but at the same time we do need to agree but either way the state's
00:42:01.940failing on that end and that's part of it too is as long as the state is failing we should be
00:42:06.500opening up more ability to take the law into our own hands. If the state won't do it, if the state's
00:42:12.680failing, I think it's our obligation as citizens to take care of ourselves and take care of our
00:42:17.600neighbors. That's the anarchy it's going to lead to. And, you know, I see a commenter, LZGP, laying
00:42:24.280out all the things, yeah, just one after another. Justice system's a mess. Health care system's a
00:42:28.360mess. The border system's a mess. Yes, everything's a mess. Yet I get called every name in the book
00:42:33.700for pointing out, well, the only way I can think of to try and solve this is through independence.
00:42:38.840I'll leave that with one more mess that's going on. I've been talking about that. Elections Alberta
00:42:43.180is a mess. As we're going into this referenda, I say referenda, it gets confusing. Referenda is
00:42:48.720the plural for referendum. Referendum is just one of them either way. As we're going into a bunch of
00:42:52.960them being held this fall, Elections Alberta is just a gong show. They won't, again, with Lukasik,
00:42:58.820who is clearly campaigning, won't deal with applying equal scrutiny and obligations upon
00:43:05.140his campaign whilst following the other ones with a fine-tooth comb. And now with the scrutineering,
00:43:10.320the biggest step in holding them, you know, that we can hold elections accountable, having people
00:43:15.660there in person to watch the vote, watch the count, watch the process. Well, it turns out for
00:43:20.540the first time ever, there's a two-month cutoff before voting date for scrutineers. What this
00:43:26.980means is we can't get scrutineers anywhere after august 24th what the hell and they certainly
00:43:33.940haven't been expressly talking about that it has been available on the website but they haven't
00:43:37.420really been letting us know i run a third-party advertising group and they won't tell us the
00:43:41.340process on how you can get people appointed between now and the 24th so they're telling us
00:43:45.980i must get this done by the 24th but we're not going to tell you how to get it done and then
00:43:50.100once the deadline passes away you're up shit creek you can't have a scrutineer this is elections
00:43:55.100Alberta. We contacted them a couple of days ago. Still waiting on a response. What are you clowns
00:44:02.100doing? Just make an application for them. That's why we're even asking at this point, but apparently0.99
00:44:08.140Microsoft Word eludes them. This is the top authority of elections in Alberta. As they keep
00:44:15.800screwing this stuff up, the integrity of the entire process is going to be questioned. No matter which
00:44:22.020side loses in this, they're not going to take the outcome seriously because the electoral authority
00:44:27.840is either incompetent or has been corrupted somehow. Not good. Not good at all. If you can't
00:44:37.000have a clean democratic action, your democracy isn't working. It isn't working. So, I mean,
00:44:45.720I don't know. I don't know how much more pressure can be put on elections in Alberta. People said
00:44:48.300the premier should step in. I like to remind people that's not a precedent we want to see.
00:44:54.180We don't want to see the premier poking into the electoral thing. It should be an all-party
00:44:57.440committee. It might even have to come to a judge, but somebody's got to intervene because that
00:45:01.460electoral officer is, I don't know what the hell his interest is, but it doesn't seem to be in
00:45:05.640democracy and protecting those rights. Well, I'll leave it at that, guys. Hey, make sure to tune in
00:45:11.200to the pipeline tonight. We're going to have a kind of a different panel lined up due to some
00:45:14.920people not necessarily being available today, but we're going to cover some issues. They'll
00:45:18.740be really important. So tune into that, subscribe to our channels to catch things like Randy's
00:45:22.920podcast, this show, and lots of news updates as they come up, not to mention Nigel Hannaford's
00:45:27.500fantastic social show. So thanks for tuning in today, guys. And we will see you all again