Western Standard - June 14, 2022


CORY'S RANT The elitism in the UCP


Episode Stats

Length

4 minutes

Words per Minute

198.71931

Word Count

931

Sentence Count

52


Summary

The new rules for the UCP leadership race have been released, and they re a slap in the face to supporters of grassroots politics. If a candidate wants to run for the leadership, they have to pay a hefty deposit of $175,000, plus a $25,000 deposit, and the remaining $50,000 has to be paid within a month and a half.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 rules for the UCP leadership race have finally come out. I shouldn't say finally, they weren't
00:00:04.260 terribly delayed. They got it going in a reasonable speed. But unfortunately, it's not good. The UCP
00:00:11.980 has now shed the last remnants of being a grassroots-based party with the release of
00:00:16.220 these leadership rules. Now, if a person wants to throw their hat into the ring and run for the UCP
00:00:20.920 leadership, they're going to have to come up with no less than $175,000 in order to do so.
00:00:26.000 So, $100,000 of that fee plus a $25,000 deposit has to be paid by July 29th, you know, a month and
00:00:35.100 change. And the remaining $50,000 has to be paid two weeks later. That sort of fee for participation
00:00:41.980 in what's supposed to be a democratic exercise is a slap in the face for people who value bottom-up
00:00:46.660 grassroots politics. Now, there's good reasons for deposits and adding a cost for entry in
00:00:51.440 leadership races. I'm not denying that. Leadership races are serious business, particularly when
00:00:55.800 the new leader will become the premier of the province. A bar has to be set to ensure the
00:01:00.240 contender is making a serious bid for the position and has the ability to reasonably contest it.
00:01:05.580 It's difficult to run a race if there's over a dozen contestants in there. So, you know,
00:01:09.300 you want to kind of narrow the field. That said, too damn bad. Who said it's supposed to be easy?
00:01:14.160 If we end up with 12 in there, so what? Let's have at it. May the best candidate win.
00:01:18.260 The bar has never been set for a provincial race like this as ridiculously high as $175,000.
00:01:24.660 In the 2017 race, contestants had to pay two installments of $37,500 and they had months to
00:01:32.340 do it. There was also a $20,000 deposit. That totaled $80,000 less than this upcoming race and
00:01:39.600 with a much longer timeline for organization and getting ready to do it. In 2017, despite the much
00:01:44.820 lower bar for entry as well, only four candidates entered that race. It's safe to say the bar was
00:01:49.200 high enough to be effective. It may, in fact, even have been too high at that time. No signatures were
00:01:54.280 required from members in 2017 either, by the way. In the 2022 race, you need a thousand signatures
00:01:59.200 from members and it's going to be required from a number of regions. Now, I'm okay with setting a
00:02:04.220 high bar for petition signatures. A candidate can meet that requirement with hard work and good
00:02:08.360 organization, even if they don't have a large campaign war chest. It also stops somebody who may
00:02:13.160 have more money than they know what they do with and they're just going to toss a whimsical application
00:02:17.320 in for the job. There's a minimum bar of work that's going to be required. A deposit for compliance
00:02:22.960 is good policy as well. I've served on leadership committees and I know all too well what kind of
00:02:29.200 stunts some campaigns can try and pull off. Having a deposit on file helps encourage good behavior on
00:02:35.180 the part of the campaigns and it gives the party a means to quietly discipline campaigns if it's required
00:02:40.220 rather than turning it into a public debacle. If a candidate is trustworthy and has good connections,
00:02:45.500 they could perhaps find sponsors confident enough to front the fee at least for the deposit
00:02:49.400 with the knowledge they'll get it back later. Now, Albertans rejected the progressive conservative
00:02:54.420 party because it'd become too elitist and disconnected from ground level citizens.
00:02:58.640 The Wildrose party grew and flourished as people embraced the grassroots principles of the movement
00:03:03.500 reminiscent of the reform party of the 1990s. We like the idea that as members we count and anybody
00:03:09.400 can reasonably contest any position within the party even if they aren't part of a well-heeled
00:03:13.560 establishment. Much of the decline of the UCP in support in this last couple of years has been
00:03:18.860 due to the top-down management style of Jason Kinney since he became premier. People felt the party had
00:03:24.460 returned to the PC style of closed-door elitism and they were right. To quote Rick Bell,
00:03:30.720 Tory land had returned. In setting such a ridiculously high bar for entry into the leadership race,
00:03:36.420 the UCP is demonstrating that they still don't have a clue why their support both in the polls and in
00:03:41.400 grassroots financial contributions has plummeted. If they do have a clue, they're demonstrating they
00:03:45.900 don't care and I'm not sure which is worse. This does not bode well for a party reliant on strong
00:03:50.820 rural support for donations and volunteers. And of course, there's urban people who value grassroots
00:03:55.960 participation as well. Elitism is not going to draw back the members who had turned away because the
00:04:02.380 party's return to the old progressive conservative ways. UCP has an opportunity to rebrand itself and
00:04:07.560 rejuvenate. They could demonstrate to former supporters, and there's a lot of former ones
00:04:12.060 now, that they've learned their lesson in this last four years and they're going to return to
00:04:15.580 the grassroots principles they sold to voters when the party was formed. Instead, the UCP is appearing
00:04:21.560 tone-deaf and elitist. One can hope the new leader, and I'm not going to blame the leader candidates for
00:04:26.220 this, for whoever it might be, can change this perception. For now though, Rachel Notley is rubbing her
00:04:32.460 pants together in anticipation of another term as premier while the UCP appears as determined as
00:04:37.560 ever to alienate its own support base. I'd really hoped for better.