EXCLUSIVE： One on one conversation about Aitchison's campaign to lead the CPC.
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
205.18343
Summary
In this episode, I speak with Ontario MP for the United Conservative Party, Doug Ford. Doug Ford is a former mayor of a small town in Ontario and is now running to become the next Prime Minister of Canada. He has been a long-time member of the Ontario House of Commons and has been in politics for a long time. In this episode we talk about his journey into politics, his leadership campaign and his vision for the future of the party.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
All right. Well, thank you very much for coming to the Western Standard Studios, Mr. Aitchison.
00:00:04.320
I've been looking forward to it. We've been watching the conservative leadership race with
00:00:08.560
a lot of interest. It's been an interesting one already, lively, I guess you could say,
00:00:13.600
and different. A lot of contenders. There's six of you going for it in the campaign. It's going
00:00:17.840
to be a long one going all the way until September 10th. So I'm glad we got a chance to speak early
00:00:21.680
because I'm certain there's going to be a lot of developments as the campaign unfolds.
00:00:26.400
Well, thank you for having me. It's a great honor to be here. It's my first time at the
00:00:30.400
Western Standard. So it's great to be here. Yeah. And so you're out west and you're a member
00:00:35.520
of parliament from out in Ontario. You've been active in politics for quite some time. So
00:00:39.360
maybe I'll start, I guess, with a bit of your campaign challenges that will come out when
00:00:43.760
getting across the country. It's a weighted system for the leadership, so many votes providing. So
00:00:47.680
you certainly have to reach out to every region and develop support and bring that in. How's that
00:00:53.760
been going for you as you travel in your campaign so far? Well, it's been going well. I, you know,
00:00:58.720
as you mentioned, I'm a newer member of parliament and probably as famous as a former mayor of small
00:01:05.440
town Ontario community would be. But, you know, the message is resonating. We're really pleased with it.
00:01:11.280
And we've been doing an awful lot of social media and digital outreach as well. So touring across the
00:01:17.440
country has been a lot of fun. It's been great to meet conservatives from coast to coast.
00:01:21.360
Right. And I mean, as I kind of said earlier with six candidates in a field, I mean, it's hard to
00:01:26.320
stand out, but one of the things that I want to talk a bit about the debates, but the first debate,
00:01:29.920
and I watched it, it was the unofficial one, I guess, with a Canada strong and free network.
00:01:34.880
The way you stood out, actually, I found to be a calm voice of reason, whilst the others were
00:01:39.920
quite frisky with each other, I guess, to say it politely, but you stuck to your message and you were
00:01:44.800
quiet. But at the same time, it's hard. And I appreciated that. I think a lot of viewers appreciated
00:01:50.000
that. And that's when they discovered you that night, I think. But at the same time,
00:01:52.960
it must be difficult for you because you can, it's hard to stand out in that crowd when the
00:01:56.240
other two are stealing the spotlight. Well, I think the tone is really,
00:02:00.800
really important. It's going to be very important in the next election. And I think that when we talk
00:02:06.240
about, you know, what's going on in Ottawa, or what's not going on in Ottawa, as it might be,
00:02:11.520
I spoke about this most recently in my speech in response to the government's use of the Emergency
00:02:16.400
Measures Act related to the convoy in Ottawa. You know, the way we talk about, you know,
00:02:24.320
dividing Canadians and pitting each other against each other to win votes, that kind of divisive
00:02:29.680
rhetoric and that kind of, you know, zero-sum game approach to politics, winning is everything,
00:02:34.960
it might serve your short-term purposes, but it actually divides the country. And I just think
00:02:39.600
that we need to be, as Conservatives particularly, have an opportunity as a truly national party,
00:02:45.920
with representation across the country, to talk about the things that unites us and brings us
00:02:50.320
together. And I don't think it's easy to do that if we're fighting amongst ourselves. And I think we
00:02:55.120
need to build trust amongst, you know, Canadians that live in areas where we haven't been winning.
00:02:59.520
And so the best way to do that is, I think, is with a principled conservative message, but also
00:03:04.240
delivering that message with a tone of respect. We need to be listening to each other and build that
00:03:09.440
trust and show some unity. It doesn't have to be uniform, but we have to be unified.
00:03:14.800
And I appreciate that. I mean, the infighting can be devastating to a party, and I don't expect you
00:03:18.640
to speak to our provincial issues, but we are experiencing quite something here, you know,
00:03:22.400
with the United Conservative Party that came in with such a strong majority. And right now,
00:03:27.040
in public polling, they're in abysmal shape within Alberta. And much of it's due to the fact that
00:03:31.680
they've all been at each other's throats for the last couple of years, rather than managing the
00:03:35.840
province. And as we see, as you said, some of the tone coming out in this race, there's a risk of
00:03:40.080
that. I mean, if you divide the party too much, it could damage the whole.
00:03:43.200
Well, I think there's no shortage of, I think, frustration across the country, really,
00:03:50.560
especially related to COVID and lockdowns and, you know, the uncertainty of it and the length of
00:03:58.480
lockdowns. There's no question there's frustration and anger. I get that. But just fanning the flames of
00:04:03.520
that anger doesn't actually solve any problems. I think it's important for us to be talking about
00:04:08.640
policy ideas. I think elections are perfect opportunities for us to talk policy. And so,
00:04:14.240
instead of attacking each other, we should be talking about ideas that conservatives want to
00:04:18.720
talk about and that we can then talk to the rest of Canadians about and sell our message and form a
00:04:26.080
majority government. Getting into some of those mechanisms, as I warned you, I did want to talk a
00:04:30.080
little bit about those two debates. They were radically different from each other. One, the
00:04:34.720
first one, as I said, was very adversarial, very heated, kind of allowed for a free for all. The
00:04:40.160
second one was exceedingly moderated, very unusually. So paddles and the horn interrupting people and
00:04:47.680
things such as that. I want to speak my own point of view. I don't think either worked well to communicate
00:04:53.040
the message of the candidates out to people or terribly effectively. What are ways that these events
00:04:58.320
perhaps could be improved? Because we do want to see all the candidates. We want to see that interchange
00:05:01.680
and such. But where can we hit the mark with these sorts of events? Well, I'm not exactly sure how we
00:05:08.400
can improve them. But this much I do know is that the second debate, while I mean, it's a little bit
00:05:13.600
goofy in certain parts, at least there was a little more, you know, meat on the bone. There's a little more
00:05:19.760
policy discussion. I think that's important. We didn't get into, I think, enough policy issues. We didn't
00:05:25.120
really talk enough about foreign policy. We didn't talk enough about housing. I feel like I missed an
00:05:29.120
opportunity to talk more about housing. So it's a bit better, for sure. But I guess it speaks to the,
00:05:35.200
you know, the importance of all the candidates, making sure they get their message out and
00:05:39.760
crisscrossing the country and talking to Conservatives about ideas to bring the country,
00:05:43.760
move the country forward and to present a platform to Canadians that will resonate,
00:05:49.440
not just in the areas we consistently win, but where we need to win as well.
00:05:52.400
Right now, housing, I mean, that's a big issue. It's an acute one. And you've made it a large part
00:05:57.120
of your platform. Young people, I can't imagine how they can get into the housing market right now.
00:06:01.840
I mean, inflation is hitting us all around. But we've got a massive housing shortage. You know,
00:06:07.280
the supply is the issue, people wanting to get into the market, labor shortage. I mean, it's a very
00:06:12.160
complicated issue, but it's pressing. And I guess that's part of the largest part where you're
00:06:16.720
standing up. Do you want to expand a bit on your housing policy?
00:06:18.800
Yeah. Well, I mean, I speak to this issue of housing. It's in part one of the reasons why
00:06:24.080
I left my job as mayor of my community to run federally, because of course, at the local level
00:06:29.280
in Huntsville, we were doing all kinds of things. We were partnering with developers,
00:06:32.400
we were giving land away to Habitat for Humanity, we were waiving fees and doing all kinds of stuff.
00:06:37.600
But what was missing always was a reliable federal partner to help with funding more than anything
00:06:42.880
else to just bridge the gap on maybe affordable rental units, for example, to make those numbers
00:06:47.920
add up and make sense. And so it's the biggest reason why I decided to run ultimately. And of
00:06:53.200
course, I got to Ottawa and find a liberal government that is long on promises. They've
00:06:58.160
lots of funding announcements and photo ops with funding announcements, but you haven't seen many
00:07:03.200
ribbon cuttings. And that's because they just not get the job done. And so the government, of course,
00:07:09.040
of Canada can't just wave a magic wand and just, you know, tell cities how to run their show.
00:07:13.440
But I believe strongly that the federal government can take leadership, working collaboratively with
00:07:19.760
provinces and cities to help, you know, reduce the backlog. You know, in larger centers, it can take
00:07:25.920
up to two or three years to get zoning approval and site plan approval and all the approvals required
00:07:31.280
to just get shovels in the ground. When you're in a housing crisis, when supply is the issue,
00:07:38.240
that's not acceptable. Canadians are suffering and we need to do better. And so the federal government
00:07:42.640
can take leadership by tying the billions of dollars that the federal government assists
00:07:47.680
municipalities and provinces with on infrastructure to real results on the ground. And so I say we can
00:07:53.200
work together to eliminate things like exclusionary zoning. We can increase densities without affecting
00:07:59.360
character in all kinds of neighborhoods all across Canada. And that's something that we absolutely have
00:08:04.160
to get done. Just talking about it and promising money isn't getting the job done.
00:08:08.800
That's where your municipal experience can apply towards this sort of negotiation. And actually,
00:08:12.720
it's a subject I've been on a lot here in Calgary. We're actually at eight years right now from
00:08:17.280
plan to development at this point. And of course, your development could be shut down at any point
00:08:22.240
throughout that process too. And that's left us with a terrible backlog.
00:08:25.200
Well, this is the thing. I guess it's where I probably, you know, I bring a lot of experience
00:08:31.120
in this regard. I mean, you know, Huntsville is a lot smaller community, but the principles are the
00:08:34.880
same and the process is generally similar. You know, development and investment requires,
00:08:40.240
they really like certainty. They, you know, they don't like instability. They don't like uncertainty.
00:08:44.800
These timelines, these processes, there's no reason why there can't be, you know, specific timelines
00:08:52.160
related to getting things done as, you know, getting through this process. I used to do that
00:08:58.400
as the chair of planning in my community. And then as the mayor, we guaranteed timelines to get,
00:09:03.920
you know, reports and approvals done. We didn't skip any steps. We didn't skirt any corners. We didn't
00:09:12.000
loosen the rules. We made it very clear that these are the rules. You follow these rules,
00:09:17.600
we can proceed. And developers worked really well with that because it was certainty. Just tell us
00:09:22.640
the rules. Part of the problem you have right now in municipalities, in a lot of cases, especially
00:09:27.200
larger centers, you have, you know, ward counselors that try to teach, they kind of treat their wards like
00:09:32.320
their own fiefdom. And of course, the loudest voices in the room tend to get the most, the most
00:09:37.040
attention and you have YIMBYs. And so I've got a YIMBY plan. Yes, in my backyard. We need to
00:09:43.120
increase those densities. We need to improve these processes. We need to speed up the timelines.
00:09:48.080
And the federal government can play a leadership role in working with the provinces and cities to
00:09:51.600
get that done. I speak that language. I've been doing it for years, creating collaboration,
00:09:56.160
partnerships and moving things forward. Great. Another area, and it's, it speaks to inflationary
00:10:02.000
values. And it's a spot where you've stood out from other candidates as well. And it's not an
00:10:05.680
issue that you hear a lot coast to coast, but it's supply management. It's Canada's
00:10:09.600
dairy poultry management system. It's been around since I believe the early 70s. You're the, well,
00:10:15.600
I believe Mr. Baber has now come out against it, but initially you were the only candidate who's
00:10:19.440
spoken out against that policy. Why have you decided to take that stance when the others won?
00:10:23.920
Well, for me, this is all about affordability, but it's also about opportunity.
00:10:28.640
So supply management costs the average Canadian family about $600 a year in the grocery bill. So
00:10:34.320
it's making milk and cheese and dairy products more expensive. And that's particularly difficult in
00:10:39.440
a time when carbon taxes are making life more expensive and inflation is making life more
00:10:43.840
expensive. I represent people in my community and I know there are people across this country that
00:10:48.400
are struggling to heat their homes and put real food on the table. The other side of this issue,
00:10:53.200
of course, is that farmers are trapped in a system that limits their potential, limits their opportunity.
00:10:59.920
New Zealand, a country of 5 million people, exported $17 billion worth of dairy products
00:11:04.560
around the world last year. Canada, a country of almost 40 million people, exported 378 million.
00:11:11.840
There's huge opportunity to be unleashed for Canadian farmers that produce
00:11:16.080
world-class dairy products that can market it to the world.
00:11:19.840
And so I don't think this is a question of pitting farmers against consumers.
00:11:24.480
I think it's a question of making life more affordable for Canadian families, but I also see
00:11:29.200
it as an opportunity for the government to assist in a transition away from a system that maintains
00:11:35.920
a status quo and it might be stable, but transitions away from that system and in collaboration and
00:11:42.240
cooperation with farmers helps them create new markets around the world that farmers can then,
00:11:50.320
Yeah, and it's understandable. You can't just flick a switch and stop the system. It would
00:11:54.000
disrupt the entire markets and put people bankrupt. I mean, you know, they're heavily invested in
00:11:57.920
those quotas, but just seeing somebody start to say, well, we've got to set an end to this is
00:12:03.280
Well, it's… and it, you know, there are vested interests. I mean, I think the dairy lobby is pretty
00:12:07.760
powerful on Parliament Hill and I just think that they're missing out on an opportunity. And if we work
00:12:14.080
together, we can… we can make… we can make Canadian dairy, you know, a coveted… coveted products
00:12:20.480
Great. So speaking across the country then, getting out of unity, it's a big, broad issue and it's one
00:12:25.840
in Canada we've always got. Quebec used to be the more acute one. You'd hear more through the 80s and
00:12:31.280
90s, but now in the West, we're getting pretty upset with a lot of policies out here. One that recently
00:12:36.560
came up was… it was the court ruling on C-69. It's now headed… heading to the Supreme Court of Canada,
00:12:41.840
we're… we'll see. I don't hold a lot of confidence. It's going to uphold the provincial
00:12:45.360
ruling, but we'll see. But we've felt a lot in the West that we've been either ignored or taken
00:12:50.080
for granted or at times even outright abused by the government. How can you end some of that
00:12:54.720
national unity right now when people are feeling so divided?
00:12:57.280
Well, and this is… this is one of the key issues that I think speaks to this divisive rhetoric that
00:13:01.680
we've seen. We've seen a Liberal government for the last seven years that has been quite happy to
00:13:05.440
demonize Western Canadians and particularly Albertans and Saskatchewan.
00:13:10.320
What's the… what's the… what's the… what's the… Saskatchewanian, I guess?
00:13:15.040
Saskatchewanian, I guess? But happy to demonize the hard-working folks in these two
00:13:19.360
provinces that are the energy superpower of our country to win votes in downtown Toronto.
00:13:26.640
What we need to talk to each other about is the fact that not only is Canadian energy the most ethically
00:13:33.920
produced energy in the world, but we're bringing in… we're bringing in things… oil from places like
00:13:39.280
Saudi Arabia and Venezuela that is not ethically produced. And the other important factor, of
00:13:44.800
course, is that, you know, the oil sands here in Fort McMurray has reduced their carbon output on
00:13:50.160
their production by 30 percent over the last 15 years. They're responsible. These are responsible
00:13:54.800
producers that are doing their part to help reduce Canada's footprint overall. So we need to… we need to
00:14:01.920
listen to each other. This is part of the challenge. We need to start listening to each other's
00:14:05.760
Canadians and recognizing that Albertans care as much about the future of this planet as do people
00:14:11.520
in downtown Toronto. And I know there's people in downtown Toronto that think taxes are too high as
00:14:16.080
well. So we need leaders that actually start talking about things that unites us, brings us together,
00:14:22.240
instead of focusing on ways to win elections, through division. This is a key area. This is an
00:14:28.240
Yeah, about… and I've asked every other candidate on this too, and it's a tough one,
00:14:32.160
is equalization. I understand it's constitutionally entrenched, but there is room to work perhaps on
00:14:36.960
the formula or ways that it's administered and things like that without tearing open the nightmare
00:14:40.880
of the constitution. Would you look at addressing equalization as many out here feel that perhaps
00:14:45.520
it's not been applied fairly or properly over the last few decades?
00:14:48.800
Yeah, I actually think that equalization is one piece of a much broader conversation that the federal
00:14:54.400
government needs to have with the provinces. I think that the relationship that exists now between
00:14:58.640
the federal government and provincial governments is unhealthy. And a big part of that is equalization,
00:15:04.000
but another big part of that is our health care system. Canadians wear as a badge of honor,
00:15:08.240
almost part of our identity, that we have this amazing health care system. It's the best in the
00:15:12.800
world. And the truth of the matter is, it's not the best in the world. It's failing Canadians. It's
00:15:16.720
part of the reason… it's one of the things that I hope we have learned through COVID-19 is that we don't
00:15:22.000
have the best health care system in the world. And part of the reason for that is, of course, it was
00:15:26.320
created on a promise from the federal government, meddling in provincial affairs again, to pay 50%
00:15:31.840
of the cost. We've never lived up to that promise as a federal government. And as a result, you see
00:15:37.600
provinces struggling to keep up with, you know, the growing burden of health care services. And they're
00:15:44.720
not fiscally sustainable as a result. I think it's time for a more respectful relationship between the
00:15:50.400
federal government and the provinces on all of these issues and create more fairness in the system
00:15:57.280
that actually respects the role of the provinces and gets the federal government out of meddling in
00:16:01.200
provincial affairs. The provinces actually run this country. They actually run the country.
00:16:06.000
A lot could be avoided if we just stick to the jurisdictional things we already have in the
00:16:09.040
constitution. And honestly, the federal government was created… you look at the constitution,
00:16:12.720
the provinces came together and created this federal government for a lot of different reasons. One of which,
00:16:17.120
though, was to actually help create new markets in the world. And if the federal government focused
00:16:23.280
on the things that it was meant to do, things like making sure we have, you know, a well-equipped
00:16:29.040
armed services, instead of playing games with provincial services, we could focus on the things that
00:16:33.760
we're supposed to. We wouldn't have embarrassing situations like we have right now, where we've taken
00:16:39.120
decades too long to replace fighter jets that are 50, almost 50 years old. And we would be a reliable
00:16:44.880
partner with our allies. And our allies wouldn't be creating new alliances without us because
00:16:50.560
we just won't show up to the table. We haven't been a reliable partner. So the federal government
00:16:54.560
needs to get back to doing what it was created to do in the first place and start doing it well.
00:16:58.240
Great. Well, before I let you go, are there some other policy points you want to hit before I
00:17:03.360
let you out of the studio and back onto the campaign show?
00:17:05.600
Well, we could talk for hours about the policy.
00:17:09.600
But honestly, the biggest thing for me is about affordability. This is a question about affordability
00:17:17.360
for Canadians across this country. I think that this race should be about policies that make life
00:17:23.280
more affordable for Canadians. And I think if that is our message as conservatives going forward,
00:17:27.440
we will form the next government and we can get rid of a tired Liberal government.
00:17:30.640
Great. So where can people find more information about your campaign and follow-up or support?
00:17:35.520
It's very easy. Since nobody knows how to pronounce or spell my last name,
00:17:43.600
Great. Well, I appreciate that. But I think Mr. Polyev has still had more name mispronunciations
00:17:48.640
going on than yourself. He probably has actually, yes.
00:17:50.560
Your second. Well, thank you very much for coming in and joining us today.
00:17:53.280
And I look forward to talking to you again down the road.