Western Standard - May 18, 2022


EXCLUSIVE: One on one conversation about Aitchison's campaign to lead the CPC.


Episode Stats


Length

17 minutes

Words per minute

205.18343

Word count

3,684

Sentence count

234

Harmful content

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I speak with Ontario MP for the United Conservative Party, Doug Ford. Doug Ford is a former mayor of a small town in Ontario and is now running to become the next Prime Minister of Canada. He has been a long-time member of the Ontario House of Commons and has been in politics for a long time. In this episode we talk about his journey into politics, his leadership campaign and his vision for the future of the party.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 All right. Well, thank you very much for coming to the Western Standard Studios, Mr. Aitchison.
00:00:04.320 I've been looking forward to it. We've been watching the conservative leadership race with
00:00:08.560 a lot of interest. It's been an interesting one already, lively, I guess you could say,
00:00:13.600 and different. A lot of contenders. There's six of you going for it in the campaign. It's going
00:00:17.840 to be a long one going all the way until September 10th. So I'm glad we got a chance to speak early
00:00:21.680 because I'm certain there's going to be a lot of developments as the campaign unfolds.
00:00:26.400 Well, thank you for having me. It's a great honor to be here. It's my first time at the
00:00:30.400 Western Standard. So it's great to be here. Yeah. And so you're out west and you're a member
00:00:35.520 of parliament from out in Ontario. You've been active in politics for quite some time. So
00:00:39.360 maybe I'll start, I guess, with a bit of your campaign challenges that will come out when
00:00:43.760 getting across the country. It's a weighted system for the leadership, so many votes providing. So
00:00:47.680 you certainly have to reach out to every region and develop support and bring that in. How's that
00:00:53.760 been going for you as you travel in your campaign so far? Well, it's been going well. I, you know,
00:00:58.720 as you mentioned, I'm a newer member of parliament and probably as famous as a former mayor of small
00:01:05.440 town Ontario community would be. But, you know, the message is resonating. We're really pleased with it.
00:01:11.280 And we've been doing an awful lot of social media and digital outreach as well. So touring across the
00:01:17.440 country has been a lot of fun. It's been great to meet conservatives from coast to coast.
00:01:21.360 Right. And I mean, as I kind of said earlier with six candidates in a field, I mean, it's hard to
00:01:26.320 stand out, but one of the things that I want to talk a bit about the debates, but the first debate,
00:01:29.920 and I watched it, it was the unofficial one, I guess, with a Canada strong and free network.
00:01:34.880 The way you stood out, actually, I found to be a calm voice of reason, whilst the others were
00:01:39.920 quite frisky with each other, I guess, to say it politely, but you stuck to your message and you were
00:01:44.800 quiet. But at the same time, it's hard. And I appreciated that. I think a lot of viewers appreciated
00:01:50.000 that. And that's when they discovered you that night, I think. But at the same time,
00:01:52.960 it must be difficult for you because you can, it's hard to stand out in that crowd when the
00:01:56.240 other two are stealing the spotlight. Well, I think the tone is really,
00:02:00.800 really important. It's going to be very important in the next election. And I think that when we talk
00:02:06.240 about, you know, what's going on in Ottawa, or what's not going on in Ottawa, as it might be,
00:02:11.520 I spoke about this most recently in my speech in response to the government's use of the Emergency
00:02:16.400 Measures Act related to the convoy in Ottawa. You know, the way we talk about, you know,
00:02:24.320 dividing Canadians and pitting each other against each other to win votes, that kind of divisive
00:02:29.680 rhetoric and that kind of, you know, zero-sum game approach to politics, winning is everything,
00:02:34.960 it might serve your short-term purposes, but it actually divides the country. And I just think
00:02:39.600 that we need to be, as Conservatives particularly, have an opportunity as a truly national party,
00:02:45.920 with representation across the country, to talk about the things that unites us and brings us
00:02:50.320 together. And I don't think it's easy to do that if we're fighting amongst ourselves. And I think we
00:02:55.120 need to build trust amongst, you know, Canadians that live in areas where we haven't been winning.
00:02:59.520 And so the best way to do that is, I think, is with a principled conservative message, but also
00:03:04.240 delivering that message with a tone of respect. We need to be listening to each other and build that
00:03:09.440 trust and show some unity. It doesn't have to be uniform, but we have to be unified.
00:03:14.800 And I appreciate that. I mean, the infighting can be devastating to a party, and I don't expect you
00:03:18.640 to speak to our provincial issues, but we are experiencing quite something here, you know,
00:03:22.400 with the United Conservative Party that came in with such a strong majority. And right now,
00:03:27.040 in public polling, they're in abysmal shape within Alberta. And much of it's due to the fact that
00:03:31.680 they've all been at each other's throats for the last couple of years, rather than managing the
00:03:35.840 province. And as we see, as you said, some of the tone coming out in this race, there's a risk of
00:03:40.080 that. I mean, if you divide the party too much, it could damage the whole.
00:03:43.200 Well, I think there's no shortage of, I think, frustration across the country, really,
00:03:50.560 especially related to COVID and lockdowns and, you know, the uncertainty of it and the length of
00:03:58.480 lockdowns. There's no question there's frustration and anger. I get that. But just fanning the flames of
00:04:03.520 that anger doesn't actually solve any problems. I think it's important for us to be talking about
00:04:08.640 policy ideas. I think elections are perfect opportunities for us to talk policy. And so,
00:04:14.240 instead of attacking each other, we should be talking about ideas that conservatives want to
00:04:18.720 talk about and that we can then talk to the rest of Canadians about and sell our message and form a
00:04:26.080 majority government. Getting into some of those mechanisms, as I warned you, I did want to talk a
00:04:30.080 little bit about those two debates. They were radically different from each other. One, the
00:04:34.720 first one, as I said, was very adversarial, very heated, kind of allowed for a free for all. The
00:04:40.160 second one was exceedingly moderated, very unusually. So paddles and the horn interrupting people and
00:04:47.680 things such as that. I want to speak my own point of view. I don't think either worked well to communicate
00:04:53.040 the message of the candidates out to people or terribly effectively. What are ways that these events
00:04:58.320 perhaps could be improved? Because we do want to see all the candidates. We want to see that interchange
00:05:01.680 and such. But where can we hit the mark with these sorts of events? Well, I'm not exactly sure how we
00:05:08.400 can improve them. But this much I do know is that the second debate, while I mean, it's a little bit
00:05:13.600 goofy in certain parts, at least there was a little more, you know, meat on the bone. There's a little more
00:05:19.760 policy discussion. I think that's important. We didn't get into, I think, enough policy issues. We didn't
00:05:25.120 really talk enough about foreign policy. We didn't talk enough about housing. I feel like I missed an
00:05:29.120 opportunity to talk more about housing. So it's a bit better, for sure. But I guess it speaks to the,
00:05:35.200 you know, the importance of all the candidates, making sure they get their message out and
00:05:39.760 crisscrossing the country and talking to Conservatives about ideas to bring the country,
00:05:43.760 move the country forward and to present a platform to Canadians that will resonate,
00:05:49.440 not just in the areas we consistently win, but where we need to win as well.
00:05:52.400 Right now, housing, I mean, that's a big issue. It's an acute one. And you've made it a large part
00:05:57.120 of your platform. Young people, I can't imagine how they can get into the housing market right now.
00:06:01.840 I mean, inflation is hitting us all around. But we've got a massive housing shortage. You know,
00:06:07.280 the supply is the issue, people wanting to get into the market, labor shortage. I mean, it's a very
00:06:12.160 complicated issue, but it's pressing. And I guess that's part of the largest part where you're
00:06:16.720 standing up. Do you want to expand a bit on your housing policy?
00:06:18.800 Yeah. Well, I mean, I speak to this issue of housing. It's in part one of the reasons why
00:06:24.080 I left my job as mayor of my community to run federally, because of course, at the local level
00:06:29.280 in Huntsville, we were doing all kinds of things. We were partnering with developers,
00:06:32.400 we were giving land away to Habitat for Humanity, we were waiving fees and doing all kinds of stuff.
00:06:37.600 But what was missing always was a reliable federal partner to help with funding more than anything
00:06:42.880 else to just bridge the gap on maybe affordable rental units, for example, to make those numbers
00:06:47.920 add up and make sense. And so it's the biggest reason why I decided to run ultimately. And of
00:06:53.200 course, I got to Ottawa and find a liberal government that is long on promises. They've
00:06:58.160 lots of funding announcements and photo ops with funding announcements, but you haven't seen many
00:07:03.200 ribbon cuttings. And that's because they just not get the job done. And so the government, of course,
00:07:09.040 of Canada can't just wave a magic wand and just, you know, tell cities how to run their show.
00:07:13.440 But I believe strongly that the federal government can take leadership, working collaboratively with
00:07:19.760 provinces and cities to help, you know, reduce the backlog. You know, in larger centers, it can take
00:07:25.920 up to two or three years to get zoning approval and site plan approval and all the approvals required
00:07:31.280 to just get shovels in the ground. When you're in a housing crisis, when supply is the issue,
00:07:38.240 that's not acceptable. Canadians are suffering and we need to do better. And so the federal government
00:07:42.640 can take leadership by tying the billions of dollars that the federal government assists
00:07:47.680 municipalities and provinces with on infrastructure to real results on the ground. And so I say we can
00:07:53.200 work together to eliminate things like exclusionary zoning. We can increase densities without affecting
00:07:59.360 character in all kinds of neighborhoods all across Canada. And that's something that we absolutely have
00:08:04.160 to get done. Just talking about it and promising money isn't getting the job done.
00:08:08.800 That's where your municipal experience can apply towards this sort of negotiation. And actually,
00:08:12.720 it's a subject I've been on a lot here in Calgary. We're actually at eight years right now from
00:08:17.280 plan to development at this point. And of course, your development could be shut down at any point
00:08:22.240 throughout that process too. And that's left us with a terrible backlog.
00:08:25.200 Well, this is the thing. I guess it's where I probably, you know, I bring a lot of experience
00:08:31.120 in this regard. I mean, you know, Huntsville is a lot smaller community, but the principles are the
00:08:34.880 same and the process is generally similar. You know, development and investment requires,
00:08:40.240 they really like certainty. They, you know, they don't like instability. They don't like uncertainty.
00:08:44.800 These timelines, these processes, there's no reason why there can't be, you know, specific timelines
00:08:52.160 related to getting things done as, you know, getting through this process. I used to do that
00:08:58.400 as the chair of planning in my community. And then as the mayor, we guaranteed timelines to get,
00:09:03.920 you know, reports and approvals done. We didn't skip any steps. We didn't skirt any corners. We didn't
00:09:12.000 loosen the rules. We made it very clear that these are the rules. You follow these rules,
00:09:17.600 we can proceed. And developers worked really well with that because it was certainty. Just tell us
00:09:22.640 the rules. Part of the problem you have right now in municipalities, in a lot of cases, especially
00:09:27.200 larger centers, you have, you know, ward counselors that try to teach, they kind of treat their wards like
00:09:32.320 their own fiefdom. And of course, the loudest voices in the room tend to get the most, the most
00:09:37.040 attention and you have YIMBYs. And so I've got a YIMBY plan. Yes, in my backyard. We need to
00:09:43.120 increase those densities. We need to improve these processes. We need to speed up the timelines.
00:09:48.080 And the federal government can play a leadership role in working with the provinces and cities to
00:09:51.600 get that done. I speak that language. I've been doing it for years, creating collaboration,
00:09:56.160 partnerships and moving things forward. Great. Another area, and it's, it speaks to inflationary
00:10:02.000 values. And it's a spot where you've stood out from other candidates as well. And it's not an
00:10:05.680 issue that you hear a lot coast to coast, but it's supply management. It's Canada's
00:10:09.600 dairy poultry management system. It's been around since I believe the early 70s. You're the, well,
00:10:15.600 I believe Mr. Baber has now come out against it, but initially you were the only candidate who's
00:10:19.440 spoken out against that policy. Why have you decided to take that stance when the others won?
00:10:23.920 Well, for me, this is all about affordability, but it's also about opportunity.
00:10:28.640 So supply management costs the average Canadian family about $600 a year in the grocery bill. So
00:10:34.320 it's making milk and cheese and dairy products more expensive. And that's particularly difficult in
00:10:39.440 a time when carbon taxes are making life more expensive and inflation is making life more
00:10:43.840 expensive. I represent people in my community and I know there are people across this country that
00:10:48.400 are struggling to heat their homes and put real food on the table. The other side of this issue,
00:10:53.200 of course, is that farmers are trapped in a system that limits their potential, limits their opportunity.
00:10:59.920 New Zealand, a country of 5 million people, exported $17 billion worth of dairy products
00:11:04.560 around the world last year. Canada, a country of almost 40 million people, exported 378 million.
00:11:11.840 There's huge opportunity to be unleashed for Canadian farmers that produce
00:11:16.080 world-class dairy products that can market it to the world.
00:11:19.840 And so I don't think this is a question of pitting farmers against consumers.
00:11:24.480 I think it's a question of making life more affordable for Canadian families, but I also see
00:11:29.200 it as an opportunity for the government to assist in a transition away from a system that maintains
00:11:35.920 a status quo and it might be stable, but transitions away from that system and in collaboration and
00:11:42.240 cooperation with farmers helps them create new markets around the world that farmers can then,
00:11:48.480 you know, realize a lot more potential.
00:11:50.320 Yeah, and it's understandable. You can't just flick a switch and stop the system. It would
00:11:54.000 disrupt the entire markets and put people bankrupt. I mean, you know, they're heavily invested in
00:11:57.920 those quotas, but just seeing somebody start to say, well, we've got to set an end to this is
00:12:02.240 finally a good start. So it's…
00:12:03.280 Well, it's… and it, you know, there are vested interests. I mean, I think the dairy lobby is pretty
00:12:07.760 powerful on Parliament Hill and I just think that they're missing out on an opportunity. And if we work
00:12:14.080 together, we can… we can make… we can make Canadian dairy, you know, a coveted… coveted products
00:12:19.840 across the world.
00:12:20.480 Great. So speaking across the country then, getting out of unity, it's a big, broad issue and it's one
00:12:25.840 in Canada we've always got. Quebec used to be the more acute one. You'd hear more through the 80s and
00:12:31.280 90s, but now in the West, we're getting pretty upset with a lot of policies out here. One that recently
00:12:36.560 came up was… it was the court ruling on C-69. It's now headed… heading to the Supreme Court of Canada,
00:12:41.840 we're… we'll see. I don't hold a lot of confidence. It's going to uphold the provincial
00:12:45.360 ruling, but we'll see. But we've felt a lot in the West that we've been either ignored or taken
00:12:50.080 for granted or at times even outright abused by the government. How can you end some of that
00:12:54.720 national unity right now when people are feeling so divided?
00:12:57.280 Well, and this is… this is one of the key issues that I think speaks to this divisive rhetoric that
00:13:01.680 we've seen. We've seen a Liberal government for the last seven years that has been quite happy to
00:13:05.440 demonize Western Canadians and particularly Albertans and Saskatchewan.
00:13:10.320 What's the… what's the… what's the… what's the… Saskatchewanian, I guess?
00:13:14.000 Yeah, that would be right, yes.
00:13:15.040 Saskatchewanian, I guess? But happy to demonize the hard-working folks in these two
00:13:19.360 provinces that are the energy superpower of our country to win votes in downtown Toronto.
00:13:26.640 What we need to talk to each other about is the fact that not only is Canadian energy the most ethically
00:13:33.920 produced energy in the world, but we're bringing in… we're bringing in things… oil from places like
00:13:39.280 Saudi Arabia and Venezuela that is not ethically produced. And the other important factor, of
00:13:44.800 course, is that, you know, the oil sands here in Fort McMurray has reduced their carbon output on
00:13:50.160 their production by 30 percent over the last 15 years. They're responsible. These are responsible
00:13:54.800 producers that are doing their part to help reduce Canada's footprint overall. So we need to… we need to
00:14:01.920 listen to each other. This is part of the challenge. We need to start listening to each other's
00:14:05.760 Canadians and recognizing that Albertans care as much about the future of this planet as do people
00:14:11.520 in downtown Toronto. And I know there's people in downtown Toronto that think taxes are too high as
00:14:16.080 well. So we need leaders that actually start talking about things that unites us, brings us together,
00:14:22.240 instead of focusing on ways to win elections, through division. This is a key area. This is an
00:14:27.280 absolutely key area.
00:14:28.240 Yeah, about… and I've asked every other candidate on this too, and it's a tough one,
00:14:32.160 is equalization. I understand it's constitutionally entrenched, but there is room to work perhaps on
00:14:36.960 the formula or ways that it's administered and things like that without tearing open the nightmare
00:14:40.880 of the constitution. Would you look at addressing equalization as many out here feel that perhaps
00:14:45.520 it's not been applied fairly or properly over the last few decades?
00:14:48.800 Yeah, I actually think that equalization is one piece of a much broader conversation that the federal
00:14:54.400 government needs to have with the provinces. I think that the relationship that exists now between
00:14:58.640 the federal government and provincial governments is unhealthy. And a big part of that is equalization,
00:15:04.000 but another big part of that is our health care system. Canadians wear as a badge of honor,
00:15:08.240 almost part of our identity, that we have this amazing health care system. It's the best in the
00:15:12.800 world. And the truth of the matter is, it's not the best in the world. It's failing Canadians. It's 0.65
00:15:16.720 part of the reason… it's one of the things that I hope we have learned through COVID-19 is that we don't
00:15:22.000 have the best health care system in the world. And part of the reason for that is, of course, it was
00:15:26.320 created on a promise from the federal government, meddling in provincial affairs again, to pay 50%
00:15:31.840 of the cost. We've never lived up to that promise as a federal government. And as a result, you see
00:15:37.600 provinces struggling to keep up with, you know, the growing burden of health care services. And they're
00:15:44.720 not fiscally sustainable as a result. I think it's time for a more respectful relationship between the
00:15:50.400 federal government and the provinces on all of these issues and create more fairness in the system
00:15:57.280 that actually respects the role of the provinces and gets the federal government out of meddling in
00:16:01.200 provincial affairs. The provinces actually run this country. They actually run the country.
00:16:06.000 A lot could be avoided if we just stick to the jurisdictional things we already have in the
00:16:09.040 constitution. And honestly, the federal government was created… you look at the constitution,
00:16:12.720 the provinces came together and created this federal government for a lot of different reasons. One of which,
00:16:17.120 though, was to actually help create new markets in the world. And if the federal government focused
00:16:23.280 on the things that it was meant to do, things like making sure we have, you know, a well-equipped
00:16:29.040 armed services, instead of playing games with provincial services, we could focus on the things that
00:16:33.760 we're supposed to. We wouldn't have embarrassing situations like we have right now, where we've taken
00:16:39.120 decades too long to replace fighter jets that are 50, almost 50 years old. And we would be a reliable
00:16:44.880 partner with our allies. And our allies wouldn't be creating new alliances without us because
00:16:50.560 we just won't show up to the table. We haven't been a reliable partner. So the federal government
00:16:54.560 needs to get back to doing what it was created to do in the first place and start doing it well.
00:16:58.240 Great. Well, before I let you go, are there some other policy points you want to hit before I
00:17:03.360 let you out of the studio and back onto the campaign show?
00:17:05.600 Well, we could talk for hours about the policy.
00:17:07.840 Yes, look a good one, perhaps.
00:17:09.600 But honestly, the biggest thing for me is about affordability. This is a question about affordability
00:17:17.360 for Canadians across this country. I think that this race should be about policies that make life
00:17:23.280 more affordable for Canadians. And I think if that is our message as conservatives going forward,
00:17:27.440 we will form the next government and we can get rid of a tired Liberal government.
00:17:30.640 Great. So where can people find more information about your campaign and follow-up or support?
00:17:35.520 It's very easy. Since nobody knows how to pronounce or spell my last name,
00:17:39.760 my website is votescott.ca. It's very easy.
00:17:43.600 Great. Well, I appreciate that. But I think Mr. Polyev has still had more name mispronunciations
00:17:48.640 going on than yourself. He probably has actually, yes.
00:17:50.560 Your second. Well, thank you very much for coming in and joining us today.
00:17:52.720 Thank you.
00:17:53.280 And I look forward to talking to you again down the road.
00:17:55.280 Thanks again.