Western Standard - July 14, 2023


Former CRTC Vice Chair and newspaper executive Peter Menzies on Bill C 18 and the state of Canada's

Topics
Mentioned
CMS: Canada’s system of racial apartheid needs to end MPC Daily Market Update Jul 17, 2023

Episode Stats


Length

17 minutes

Words per minute

189.06

Word count

3,369

Sentence count

232

Harmful content

Toxicity

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of the podcast, I'm joined by Peter Bongiorno, editor-in-chief of the New York Times, to talk about the C-18 Bill, and whether or not the government should get involved with it.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 So thank you very much for joining the show today, Peter.
00:00:02.900 Hey, it's my pleasure, thanks for inviting me.
00:00:05.060 So, I mean, most of my listeners are pretty aware
00:00:07.460 due to many repeated rants out of me and what C18 is,
00:00:10.240 but perhaps if you could run down in a nutshell
00:00:12.560 what that bill is about and where it's been.
00:00:15.280 Yeah, it's an effort to redistribute advertising income
00:00:18.900 earned by social media and search platforms
00:00:21.620 and search engines to newspapers
00:00:25.220 and other news organizations,
00:00:27.580 qualified ones that have been making the case.
00:00:31.240 Here's the journalistic approach.
00:00:32.440 I've been making the case,
00:00:33.860 shouting very loudly that Facebook et al
00:00:36.760 have been stealing their content
00:00:38.780 and this has been going on for years.
00:00:41.020 They keep saying that.
00:00:41.920 I'm not quite sure why they get away with it
00:00:43.540 because they never support it
00:00:45.160 with anything other than just a statement.
00:00:47.460 So the non-journalistic or the less journalistic point of view
00:00:50.640 is that it's kind of a shakedown.
00:00:52.820 Actually, it is a shakedown.
00:00:54.420 It most certainly is.
00:00:56.140 But I mean, I guess maybe we'll talk a little more though.
00:00:59.160 I mean, into the, I would consider it as a libertarian,
00:01:02.480 more of a devil's advocate point of view.
00:01:04.300 But I mean, you've seen the decline of revenue
00:01:07.100 and ability in the media industry.
00:01:08.560 You know, I mean, it's been dramatic this last 10 years
00:01:10.600 and it's a, people will call it a problem
00:01:12.440 that needs to be solved,
00:01:13.360 whether or not the government should intervene to do so or not.
00:01:16.480 But our news is at risk.
00:01:19.100 So, I mean, C18 isn't the solution,
00:01:20.720 but what should we be doing?
00:01:22.720 Yeah, I mean, I guess there's a couple arguments there.
00:01:25.560 News is certainly at risk because it's a time of disruption, right?
00:01:28.940 But times of disruption tend to sort them in from the boys
00:01:32.180 in these kinds of things.
00:01:33.480 So the companies that are well-equipped intellectually
00:01:36.400 and willing to invest in their product tend to find their ways
00:01:40.940 through these things.
00:01:42.060 Companies that aren't tend to struggle more.
00:01:46.060 I mean, it's gonna be a struggle for everybody,
00:01:47.980 but some make it and some don't.
00:01:50.200 That's what happens.
00:01:51.060 That's in when things evolve, right?
00:01:52.940 When the business models evolve in terms of that.
00:01:55.860 There have been a number of newspapers,
00:01:57.820 the Wall Street Journal,
00:01:58.820 the New York Times is actually starting to do quite well.
00:02:02.240 Daily Telegraph in London, the Times,
00:02:05.120 the Guardian made money last year in London.
00:02:07.440 And, you know, after years of not making it
00:02:09.620 and going with, you know, voluntary subscriptions
00:02:11.860 and voluntary donations, others have gone behind a paywall.
00:02:15.540 You guys are using a paywall.
00:02:19.080 You know, the guys who are going back to that
00:02:21.500 and are providing content that is pleasing to their readers
00:02:25.460 are getting through it.
00:02:26.620 Others are not.
00:02:28.900 And so, you know, and yet at the same time,
00:02:33.120 we've been through the internet,
00:02:34.360 we have access probably to more news
00:02:36.000 than we've ever had before.
00:02:38.320 Yeah, and I guess there's what the,
00:02:41.100 one of the bigger risks with the government getting in this way,
00:02:43.640 particularly with C-18,
00:02:45.280 is it'll stunt the evolution of outlets.
00:02:47.900 I mean, it doesn't give them that incentive then
00:02:49.620 to change or be innovative or try new models.
00:02:52.480 And it also strangles the little ones like us
00:02:54.980 or the ones that may not qualify
00:02:56.940 as the government's going to pick and choose
00:02:58.780 who is a qualified outlet and who isn't.
00:03:01.580 Well, it's actually got worse than that.
00:03:03.200 I hate to break it to you,
00:03:04.960 but this week it appeared like the government
00:03:07.720 was sort of backing down and it is because I think,
00:03:12.100 I think Meta, Facebook and Instagram,
00:03:15.480 unless something dramatic changes, they're gone for good.
00:03:18.060 They're out of the business in Canada, everywhere.
00:03:21.400 They are not news providers, they are content providers.
00:03:25.280 And news is a small percentage.
00:03:26.780 And as they've been saying recently,
00:03:29.180 it's just not worth the grief.
00:03:30.560 There's just not, it's 3% of their content and that,
00:03:34.100 and those users are replicable.
00:03:36.240 They'll still be there for other reasons.
00:03:37.700 In other words, yeah.
00:03:39.820 But what they've done is they've changed from a per links,
00:03:43.460 which was really problem sort of way of charging people,
00:03:46.600 charging the social media, the web giants,
00:03:49.520 to sort of putting a cap on it, making a calculation.
00:03:53.420 And then the big thing problem for guys like you
00:03:56.480 is that they're really restricting the number of people
00:03:59.540 to whom they may have to distribute money.
00:04:02.280 So I still think it's a long shot
00:04:04.120 that any money gets distributed through this.
00:04:06.700 But if it does, here's who it's going to.
00:04:09.140 Videotron, Bell, the CBC, probably the biggest bunch.
00:04:14.840 Rogers, you know, maybe Black Press might be the biggest one
00:04:20.220 that gets out of there.
00:04:21.480 But innovators, startups, entrepreneurs,
00:04:25.840 like Western Standard, Black Locks, Halifax Examiner,
00:04:30.000 you know, Narwhal, they're on the left, 0.99
00:04:31.540 they're on the right, they're screwed. 0.98
00:04:34.040 They'll be left out. 0.98
00:04:35.460 They will not be subsidized.
00:04:37.160 The status quo, right,
00:04:40.380 which includes most of the people who are struggling,
00:04:43.620 and a lot of people who have tons of money anyway,
00:04:46.580 like Bell and Rogers, will get the loot.
00:04:49.760 And you guys will not.
00:04:54.880 We'll have to find other ways.
00:04:56.180 We're pretty stubborn.
00:04:57.120 I don't know if they'll get rid of us that easily.
00:04:58.560 Well, that's where you need, you know,
00:04:59.740 like you gave a little pitch there.
00:05:00.940 That's where you need your readers support.
00:05:03.540 You know, like if,
00:05:05.120 and that's really the thing that people are going to have
00:05:07.380 to get their heads around.
00:05:08.320 If they want the sort of content they're looking for,
00:05:10.820 if they want local product, if they want.
00:05:13.220 Right now you have the only online newsroom in Alberta,
00:05:19.340 I think, other than the CBC, in terms of doing that.
00:05:24.260 There's no Calvary Herald, no Calvary Sun,
00:05:26.380 no Edmonton Journal, no Edmonton Sun newsroom
00:05:28.520 that I'm aware of.
00:05:30.120 If people want that, it's 10 bucks a month.
00:05:34.060 It's like, it's a beer, right?
00:05:36.900 If they're not willing to put that forward, they'll lose.
00:05:40.680 I try to remind people,
00:05:42.180 at least those of us of a vintage,
00:05:43.460 remember we never thought twice of spending
00:05:45.660 that much or more to have the paper boy,
00:05:47.220 bring that to us, to our household every day.
00:05:49.740 And that was decades ago, you know,
00:05:52.580 for that sort of price, you can get the same thing.
00:05:54.420 I'm hoping Canadian consumers learn to adapt that way.
00:05:56.800 They realize it's a product to pay for.
00:05:58.540 And a lot of our subscribers have so far,
00:06:00.820 it just takes some time.
00:06:02.500 Yeah, and you know, you don't need to get everybody,
00:06:04.220 you just need to get enough, right?
00:06:05.820 I mean, that's basically the way that needs to go.
00:06:09.420 And I mean, the Globe and Mail has, you know,
00:06:11.580 really shuttered down with the paywall
00:06:15.540 and that sort of stuff.
00:06:16.380 And all the other papers I mentioned have done that,
00:06:18.740 but you gotta have the quality,
00:06:20.060 you gotta have the value proposition, right?
00:06:21.960 So, you know, you guys are doing a good job on that
00:06:24.780 and others are too, but, you know, some,
00:06:27.400 I mean, it's very difficult, you know,
00:06:29.440 I don't like calling names out,
00:06:31.300 but it's very difficult for a post media product these days
00:06:34.680 to make a value proposition.
00:06:37.320 Half of it is, you know,
00:06:39.680 half of your local paper is the National Post.
00:06:43.520 So why would you buy your local paper when really,
00:06:46.320 I mean, school board doesn't get covered,
00:06:48.000 city council get covered, courts, eh, now and then, right?
00:06:52.040 So what's the point?
00:06:55.240 It's difficult.
00:06:56.080 So, I mean, do you think maybe though,
00:06:58.120 I mean, the government backed down a little bit.
00:07:00.040 And as you sort of point out,
00:07:01.160 the government really doesn't have the leverage
00:07:03.560 they pretend to have or think they have
00:07:05.200 with the social media giants.
00:07:06.680 I mean, it was 3% of the content they provided.
00:07:09.560 I can't see Facebook and Google back and down.
00:07:11.920 People keep saying, well, that happened in Australia,
00:07:13.560 but I think that just says all the more,
00:07:15.080 they're not letting that precedent get set
00:07:16.720 because every country with a greedy government
00:07:18.840 is gonna come in and try and snatch some from them
00:07:21.080 in the future.
00:07:21.840 So, I mean, do you think the government will swallow some pride,
00:07:24.880 maybe, and just get this bill?
00:07:26.920 Or are they just gonna keep on this standoff
00:07:29.320 and no news gets provided on those giants at all?
00:07:31.320 Sure.
00:07:31.840 Well, first of all, the narrative that Google and Facebook
00:07:34.880 backed down is one spun by Rupert Murdoch's media in Australia.
00:07:37.800 It was actually the government that backed down
00:07:39.800 and made some amendments and said, basically,
00:07:43.320 you're free to make your own deals.
00:07:44.800 You know, nobody's actually ever used the Australian legislation.
00:07:49.280 So to that extent, you know, the Australian model
00:07:52.600 is the government threatening to do something
00:07:54.280 unless everybody else does something.
00:07:56.280 I think the government's in this situation right now
00:07:58.640 where I think it's too late for Meta, for Facebook.
00:08:02.160 I think they insulted them too much.
00:08:05.520 I mean, people don't make emotional decisions.
00:08:07.560 They make business decisions.
00:08:08.800 But they also found that they were probably gonna be insulted
00:08:12.000 whether they made a philanthropic decision and said, okay,
00:08:14.960 we'll help anyway, because let's face it,
00:08:17.000 none of them set out to kill newspapers
00:08:19.040 or to kill news products, right, in terms of that.
00:08:21.440 So what they're trying to do now is salvage
00:08:23.640 some sort of deal with Google, which will put a cap on it.
00:08:30.440 And right now, my understanding is there's a huge difference
00:08:35.000 between what News Media Canada and some of the other lobby groups
00:08:38.760 lobbying for the loot are expecting and what Google's willing to pay.
00:08:45.000 So, you know, the best case scenario,
00:08:47.760 this ends up with them making some kind of deal with Google,
00:08:50.480 who then get exempted from the act.
00:08:52.440 And then they maybe never even bother bringing the act into force,
00:08:56.440 which allows Facebook Meta to still carry news,
00:08:59.120 which they might decide to get it, but it might be too late for that.
00:09:01.760 They might decide to get out of the business anyway.
00:09:03.760 Or as it stands, they don't get any deal with Google.
00:09:10.440 And as it stands, they're not going to get one, near as I can tell.
00:09:14.920 And we play this drama out through the fall.
00:09:18.200 And then we'll see what
00:09:21.600 probably the best case scenario for everybody is that the government amends Bill C-18
00:09:26.160 so that the coming into force date just gets extended into eternity.
00:09:33.160 And you just kind of nobody, they don't withdraw the act.
00:09:37.160 It sits there, but no harm is done.
00:09:40.520 Yeah.
00:09:40.760 You just kind of let it die quietly of old age.
00:09:44.680 I mean, it's got to be frustrating.
00:09:46.440 And it's been, I wrote on it recently, a difficult environment for established journalists.
00:09:52.200 They put in their time and everything, and then, you know, there just isn't the demand
00:09:56.560 for their product as there used to be.
00:09:58.960 But I mean, I see it as almost some of the outlets are really jumping
00:10:03.800 on the government bandwagon.
00:10:04.960 I think Post Media said they're going to stop advertising on Facebook
00:10:08.680 and the shots go back and forth.
00:10:10.360 But it feels like it's just sad to see such large institutions coming,
00:10:15.640 getting down to that rather than seeking changes in their ways
00:10:19.440 to try and get out of the soup they're in.
00:10:22.160 Yeah, it is.
00:10:23.080 It is.
00:10:23.480 It's really, it's kind of embarrassing, isn't it, right?
00:10:27.360 Like, I mean, it's kind of nationally embarrassing to see that we're going
00:10:30.560 through this with our media.
00:10:32.480 I mean, we used to be pretty proud of our media and that sort of stuff.
00:10:36.480 And a lot of it just isn't very good anymore.
00:10:40.360 And nobody, I can't believe I just said that out loud,
00:10:44.120 but people need to say that out loud a little bit from time to time, right?
00:10:47.360 Like, you actually have to have, like I was saying, a product that people want to buy.
00:10:53.280 And here's one of the tough things for the journalists.
00:10:55.440 Like, hey, look, they got kids.
00:10:57.120 They got mortgages.
00:10:58.640 They got, they've got, you know, livelihoods.
00:11:00.880 They've got elderly parents to care for.
00:11:02.640 They've got all those things that everybody else does.
00:11:04.640 So it's not like, you know, we shouldn't empathize with their predicament.
00:11:09.280 And I can understand their despair and their desperation in terms of that.
00:11:14.400 But news, there hasn't ever been a great deal of money in news.
00:11:19.120 The fact of the matter is those big old newspapers like the one I used to run,
00:11:23.280 it wasn't just the news that people bought it for, right?
00:11:26.800 It's like those were the days when if you wanted to rent an apartment,
00:11:29.600 you had to buy the paper.
00:11:30.960 If you wanted to, you know, sell your car, you had to put an ad in the paper.
00:11:36.320 And if you wanted to buy a car, you had to buy the paper.
00:11:38.560 If you wanted to do virtually anything, if you want to find out who had a kid,
00:11:42.400 who had the births, deaths, whose daughter got engaged, who got married,
00:11:46.480 whose grandma died, you had to buy the newspaper.
00:11:48.960 If you wanted to see the comics, the horoscope, that sort of stuff.
00:11:52.400 I mean, I got back in the day when Catherine Ford and Peter Stockland were both writing
00:11:56.800 on the Calgary Herald editorial pages and everybody thought this was great controversy.
00:12:01.040 And it was, and it was fun.
00:12:02.160 And, you know, it would be like, what are they going to say next?
00:12:04.720 And that sort of stuff.
00:12:06.080 The fact of the matter is, though, I got more phone calls
00:12:09.120 when the Canadian Tire Flyer wasn't delivered to somebody's door on a Thursday morning
00:12:13.760 than over anything Peter Stockland or Catherine Ford ever said.
00:12:16.640 Well, yeah.
00:12:17.840 I mean, it's the world has changed so dramatically.
00:12:20.160 I mean, it's good to remind everybody.
00:12:21.600 It was just such an, it was a need.
00:12:23.680 It was an integral pipeline to information that you couldn't go without it.
00:12:28.720 But those days, the internet products that really killed newspapers,
00:12:32.880 it's not so much Facebook.
00:12:34.080 I mean, Facebook didn't start making money until 2012, right?
00:12:38.720 And it was over for newspapers by then because it was Kijiji and Craigslist that did it, right?
00:12:44.000 Classified advertising was worth 30, in some cases 40% of most North American newspapers revenue.
00:12:51.040 And these guys gave that stuff away for free, right?
00:12:55.440 And how do you compete with that?
00:12:56.800 All of a sudden something you're, you know, like a product like the Globe and Mail,
00:13:00.720 if you wanted to rent an apartment, it cost you 80 bucks to put a classified ad in, right?
00:13:05.360 All of us.
00:13:06.320 And they're, I mean, these were very high rates, 25 cents a word.
00:13:09.120 I think the Herald was and that sort of stuff.
00:13:10.960 All of a sudden, somebody has given that away for free.
00:13:13.600 So if they, if they're chasing anybody for loot, it should be Kijiji and Craigslist.
00:13:17.120 Yeah, which, well, I don't want to give them ideas.
00:13:22.560 But I mean, it is tragic.
00:13:24.080 But I mean, obviously, that's just, it's just not going to change anymore.
00:13:26.800 I mean, now that I can pick up my phone and search out a used car or an apartment or a job.
00:13:33.280 It's just not coming back.
00:13:34.480 This is a change in history.
00:13:36.160 What do you think the approach is?
00:13:40.080 I mean, you think the government can quietly let this go to the wayside?
00:13:42.800 Would it almost be better to, for the rest of us to quiet down and let them sort of pad this thing away?
00:13:48.240 Well, I actually, I actually think, and you know, this is where they should have been years ago.
00:13:53.920 But I mean, we are where we are.
00:13:55.200 So there's no point in Monday morning quarterbacking it.
00:13:57.680 But my former CRTC chair, Conrad von Finkenstein, and I just recently did a paper for the McDonnell Borey Institute.
00:14:04.800 The purpose of which was just trying to say what we need is a national news industry policy of some kind, right?
00:14:10.720 It involved like our suggestion was that when people subscribe, that subscription becomes 100% tax deductible.
00:14:18.320 Now, the Globe and Mail, you know, picked up on that idea in an editorial the other day, and they suggested 70%.
00:14:24.080 Well, fine.
00:14:24.640 But I mean, what we're trying to do is get a conversation started going.
00:14:28.160 But obviously, the current 15%, that's not going to, there's no incentive in that, getting a 15%.
00:14:33.920 Tax break on your $120 a year to the, you know, I mean, who's going to even bother claiming that in their tax form?
00:14:41.360 But make it 70%, make it 100%. 0.58
00:14:43.760 It's different.
00:14:44.640 You know, a different type of funding mechanism from the web giants, all kinds of different things.
00:14:50.160 So reforming the role of the CBC, getting them out of the advertising business, that sort of stuff.
00:14:55.360 That's the sort of, that's what we need to do.
00:14:58.320 That's a long-winded way of saying what we need to be doing is not subsidizing zombie products from the past that are basically staggering around dead, right?
00:15:10.240 And trying to find out ways to keep them staggering around dead.
00:15:13.440 That's like a subsidy for products that are in palliative care.
00:15:16.720 What you need to be doing is understanding what's going on, you know, the nature of the tech revolution that's happening, which is huge, right?
00:15:27.440 And build a path forward to the future, right?
00:15:30.640 We have this federal government that fancies itself as so progressive.
00:15:34.880 And when it comes to economic matters like this through Bill C-11 and C-18, they are paleocons, right?
00:15:42.080 They're trying to preserve the world of 1985 and everything they do.
00:15:46.000 It's crazy.
00:15:47.680 No, it's not coming back.
00:15:48.800 But I guess we can keep speaking up and keep pushing and keep trying to prosper outside of that.
00:15:53.680 I really appreciate you coming on to lay out, you know, what the issue was.
00:15:56.560 I mean, you've, you know, don't want to date you too much, but you've had experience through a great number of years of journalism.
00:16:01.520 And it's worth applying that, I mean, seeing the evolution and seeing where it's gone to.
00:16:06.320 So, as you mentioned, you, you, you put content in, you know, you take part with the McDonnell Laurier Institute.
00:16:11.520 Where else can people find your work, Peter?
00:16:15.120 Well, I write for a number of different publications.
00:16:19.120 I write for Epic Times pretty regularly.
00:16:20.880 The Line, The Hub is the last piece I wrote for The Hub, got, got a lot, got a lot of carriage in terms of that.
00:16:27.680 I occasionally write for the Globe and Mail and now and then Western Standard, too, can pick up my stuff.
00:16:34.480 So watch for it.
00:16:36.480 If people were to follow the McDonnell Laurier, the easiest thing is to follow the McDonnell Laurier Institute
00:16:42.800 site or social media feeds because they pick up just about everything we do and republish it under their brand.
00:16:50.080 So that's probably the easiest way for folks to do it.
00:16:53.600 Great. Well, that's another interesting stuff there, too, by the way.
00:16:56.160 Yeah, I was about to say, I've had a number of guests, you know, we've been a part of the McDonnell Laurier Institute.
00:17:00.560 They're a fantastic organization.
00:17:02.480 People should go there, as you said, just to look in general.
00:17:05.600 You could you could lose some hours digging into the content there.
00:17:08.240 It's fantastic.
00:17:09.120 Great. Well, I thank you again for your time and sharing with us today, Peter.
00:17:14.960 And well, hopefully the next time we talk, it'll be a little less bleak outlook.
00:17:19.120 Yeah, yeah.
00:17:19.600 Well, like, you know, like I said, like, keep your chin up.
00:17:21.840 I mean, this is a disruptive time.
00:17:23.360 It's a tough time.
00:17:24.640 People will need new ideas.
00:17:26.000 Some will work and some won't.
00:17:27.600 But just keep going forward and and the smart and the able will survive.
00:17:34.800 We will.
00:17:35.280 We're also this stubborn.
00:17:39.200 Thanks, Corey.
00:17:39.760 You can become a Western Standard member for just $10 a month or $99 a year for unlimited access.