Western Standard - March 21, 2026


HANNAFORD: A year later, Carney’s Canada is still sinking


Episode Stats

Length

12 minutes

Words per Minute

131.91837

Word Count

1,674

Sentence Count

97

Misogynist Sentences

1


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A year ago, we were promised recovery and resilience. Instead, we ve got flat per capita incomes, rising unemployment, and interest payments on federal debt that rival the cost of major programs. We ve also got a gaslighting problem.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
00:00:00.000 good evening western standard viewers i'm nigel hanaford and this is a special edition of the
00:00:22.880 hanaford show something i want to talk about one of the sins common to people like me whose job it
00:00:29.200 is to read the nation's tea leaves and pass judgment upon what governments do is that we
00:00:35.180 fail to give due allowance for circumstances beyond the actor's control. So while as a
00:00:42.440 conservative it is easy for me to find fault with the Prime Minister's performance in his first year,
00:00:48.580 fairness dictates that nobody could have predicted the tariff onslaught from the U.S. that has rippled
00:00:55.380 through the Eastern Canadian economy, or the military action against Iran that has elevated
00:01:00.980 gasoline prices nationwide. If Mr. Pollyer had won the last election, he would have faced the
00:01:07.440 same demands to do something, anything. It is the somethings that Mr. Carney has done
00:01:15.160 that are the problem. After almost 10 years of Mr. Carney's predecessor, Justin Trudeau,
00:01:21.820 who did his best to make fiscal ignorance sound like a quality to aspire to,
00:01:27.400 it is understandable that enough Canadians thought putting a banker in charge was the right thing to do.
00:01:32.860 A central banker at that, in fact, twice a central banker.
00:01:36.220 How could we go wrong?
00:01:38.660 Yet, Canada's economy is limping into 2026 with the same old liberal hallmarks,
00:01:47.080 massive borrowing, sluggish growth, and a debt burden that's growing faster than our paychecks.
00:01:54.140 A year ago, we were promised recovery and resilience. Instead, we've got that flat per
00:01:59.960 capita incomes, rising unemployment, and interest payments on federal debt that rival the cost of
00:02:06.140 major programs. This isn't thriving. It's muddling through on borrowed time and borrowed money.
00:02:12.460 We've also got a gaslighting galore problem.
00:02:15.480 Listen to this.
00:02:16.580 This is actually transcribed from a press release from the Prime Minister's office
00:02:21.520 as he opened the major projects office last July.
00:02:26.120 He said there would be ports, railways, energy corridors,
00:02:30.100 critical mineral developments, clean energy initiatives.
00:02:32.680 Our industries would be diversified.
00:02:35.560 There would be new markets, high-paying careers.
00:02:38.320 heavens we would all be rich and our economy better connected whatever that means obviously
00:02:44.240 none of that has happened and while in the continued interests of fairness we admit
00:02:50.160 that it might take more than a year to get all this done nothing has even been announced as
00:02:58.160 starting except some projects that were already 99 approved before the fanfare that launched the
00:03:05.120 the major projects office. Ladies and gentlemen, what we have seen instead is our peripatetic
00:03:11.560 prime minister visiting, on average, a country every two weeks, I gather, for a year, announce
00:03:18.040 a memorandum of understanding that commits nobody to anything, and hurry home to make
00:03:22.820 a spending announcement backed by more debt. Look, this is what a memorandum of understanding
00:03:29.920 is like. It's like you meet another couple on a cruise, have a fabulous time for four days,
00:03:37.060 and part declaring that, if you're ever in Houston, look us up. It's simultaneously sincere,
00:03:45.400 a possibility, and highly unlikely. So, let's look at the numbers after a year of Mr. Carney's
00:03:55.800 travels. Canada's real GDP growth clocked in at a meager 1.7% for calendar year 2025. That's the
00:04:05.840 weakest since the pandemic year of 2020, during a time when the unexpert Mr. Trudeau was in charge.
00:04:14.920 Then there was a contraction of 0.2% in the fourth quarter. Per capita gross domestic product
00:04:21.900 has been essentially stagnant in multiple quarters,
00:04:26.860 dragged down by weak exports and tepid business investment.
00:04:30.900 Official forecasts for the current year hover around 1% to 1.2%,
00:04:36.140 well below what economists hoped for even a year ago.
00:04:41.080 Basically, folks, if you don't have 2% GDP growth per year,
00:04:45.180 you don't have much going on.
00:04:47.920 Folks, we're not building wealth.
00:04:50.000 We're barely treading water.
00:04:51.900 Meanwhile, they say inflation has cooled to an average of about 2.1% in 2025, with the consumer price index at roughly 1.8% year-over-year by early 2026.
00:05:07.820 That is supposed to make you feel better.
00:05:10.800 And that's progress of a sort from the post-pandemic spike.
00:05:17.220 Well, there's a problem with the way they put these numbers together.
00:05:20.880 the baskets these people use to come up with these reassuring numbers, including things you
00:05:28.040 don't buy very often and the prices of which therefore hardly move. Look, my wife and I still
00:05:34.040 use a color TV that we bought in 2010 for $1,000, brand new, and the equivalent thing can be had
00:05:40.840 today from Amazon Prime. Take your pick in the $900 to $1,000 range. That is kind of how I
00:05:50.800 would like inflation to be for everything. On the other hand, food prices and everyday costs,
00:05:57.560 it's a different story, isn't it? That grocery bag you filled for $65 last year is likely to cost you
00:06:03.960 closer to $75 this year, so you're paying a lot more than 2% inflation growth. That bites hard
00:06:14.040 for families here in Calgary and across Alberta and across all of Canada.
00:06:20.520 The Bank of Canada has managed to bring it near target, yet the gains feel hollow when
00:06:25.520 wages aren't keeping pace and growth remains anemic.
00:06:30.280 And that's where the labour market comes in and also tells us a tough story.
00:06:34.220 Are you looking for work?
00:06:36.860 Last week's jobless report must have hit you like an atom bomb.
00:06:40.620 rose to 6.7 percent in february up from 6.5 percent the month before with employment dropping
00:06:47.900 by 84 000 jobs that's bad enough but then there are some people who don't even look anymore and
00:06:55.180 that's where the labor force participation number comes in and that has slipped to 65
00:07:02.220 percent in the past year and so that what that means that 35 of the people out there are not
00:07:11.100 jobless they're not even looking for work so what we're really saying is that even among the people
00:07:16.140 who want to work the employment rate is going down in other words what we're seeing is softer
00:07:21.340 engagement overall fewer people working fewer people looking for work even as headline job
00:07:28.060 numbers fluctuate. No recovery here, my friends. Then there's government borrowing. A year ago,
00:07:34.940 the federal government accumulated deficit was $1.2 trillion, equivalent to 41% of GDP. Add to
00:07:43.020 that the last year's budgetary deficit of $78 billion, one of the largest non-pandemic shortfalls
00:07:49.820 ever recorded. Public debt charges are forecast to reach $53 billion this year and climb further.
00:07:58.060 Main estimates hit $487 billion for 2025-26, with deficits adding hundreds of billions over the
00:08:07.500 medium term. This government boasts about the lowest net debt to GDP in the G7 on some measures,
00:08:15.900 but that's cold comfort when interest costs are exploding and borrowing keeps piling up without
00:08:22.420 delivering robust private sector momentum i had the privilege of working with somebody who knew
00:08:29.060 better i'm going to compare this to the harper years of 2006 to 2015. stephen harper also came
00:08:37.540 to office with a towering liberal mess in 2006 and instead of the tariff war with mr trump he
00:08:44.340 He ran head-on into the Great Recession of 2007-2008.
00:08:50.060 There's always going to be something.
00:08:52.480 But policy matters, and Harper had a different way of doing things.
00:08:56.280 That is, he was forced against his will to run deficits
00:08:59.940 during the Great Recession, 2008-2009.
00:09:04.720 You know, the global crisis with gritted teeth and tears
00:09:08.220 in our conservative eyes.
00:09:09.700 My department had to write the speeches.
00:09:11.760 But then he slashed them.
00:09:14.340 slash through spending restraint and public sector discipline. By 2014, the books were near
00:09:22.200 balance with a projected surplus for 2015-16. Federal net debt to GDP fell to around 31%
00:09:32.360 by 2014, one of the G7's lowest, after rising temporarily in the recession. I'll say it again,
00:09:39.640 policy matters. Program spending growth was tightly controlled after 2010. Tax cuts like
00:09:47.080 the GST stimulated the economy, and the focus was on private sector recovery and job creation
00:09:54.900 in high-wage sectors. It was not on the atmosphere and carbon dioxide and seeing how we can get rid
00:10:05.600 of the oil sands that produced so much of the wealth that made these outstanding numbers
00:10:12.400 acceptable unemployment had trended down over time so it can be done and the contrast is stark harper
00:10:19.520 didn't have president trump's tariff policies to contend with for or for president trump himself
00:10:25.280 he'd have been stevie but for sure by the end of the first white house visit but stephen harper
00:10:29.760 navigated the worst global downturn since the depression paid down debt precisely where possible
00:10:36.240 possible and returned to surplus through deliberate restraint say it again policy matters mr carney
00:10:43.200 has a different policy and his approach today is the opposite of stephen harper's persistent large
00:10:49.200 deficits for social programs infrastructure and extended pandemic style spending even in normal
00:10:55.920 times. The result, well, you see it, you're ballooning debt, interest that crowds out
00:11:03.020 everything else, weak per capita growth, and an economy reliant on public borrowing rather than
00:11:10.080 private investment. You can't borrow your way to prosperity. Actually, I think I might have
00:11:17.400 written that once. Endless red ink mortgages future generations for today's political priorities.
00:11:23.180 It crowds out productive investment, keeps taxes higher than necessary, and leaves less room for
00:11:29.100 real emergencies. Harper proved you can balance the books without killing growth, through discipline,
00:11:35.640 not denial. The current path proves the opposite. Spend like there's no tomorrow until, guess what,
00:11:44.100 tomorrow arrives and brings with it the bill. Ladies and gentlemen, it's a time for a reset.
00:11:51.120 spending restraint, balanced budget discipline, and pro-growth reforms, cutting red tape,
00:11:58.480 incentivizing investment, and letting markets work. These are the only way forward. Harper
00:12:07.220 knew this. Resource, wealth, and fiscal responsibility built our strength, not endless
00:12:14.160 government expansion. Mr. Carney's policies have put us on a debt train. It's not jumping
00:12:20.900 the tracks yet but i'm worried about whether it's actually going to go over the side of the bridge
00:12:26.020 in the not too distant future we're not doing well and what we're doing we're doing on credit
00:12:32.660 and the interest ladies and gentlemen is coming due
00:12:36.420 For the Western Standard, I'm Nigel Hannaford.