Western Standard

00:00:00.000 Good evening, Western Standard viewers, and welcome to Hannaford, a weekly politics show.

00:00:21.000 I'm Nigel Hannaford. It is Thursday, June 26, and my guest today is Simon Hankinson, a senior

00:00:28.360 research fellow in border security and immigration at Washington's Heritage Foundation. Welcome again

00:00:35.700 to the show, Simon. Thanks for having me. Simon, we usually turn to you for what's happening on the

00:00:41.280 border, and I do have a question on that for you in a few moments. But first, you've left your

00:00:49.540 track. You've written a book, and it's called Ten Woke Commandments You Must Not Obey. Interesting

00:00:56.220 way of putting it. I think we all know what woke is, even if we can't define it. It's sort of like

00:01:02.880 pornography. We know it when we see it. It's something silly that makes normal people roll

00:01:06.880 their eyes. But it's dangerous, all right? And you're telling people to fight back by

00:01:11.580 not obeying the woke commandments. Like what? Well, as you say, it's a whole package. We know

00:01:20.020 what woke is when we hear it. It, I think, used to have a pretty innocuous and a positive meaning

00:01:25.460 about being aware of injustice when it's out there. But now, it's a series of things that you

00:01:30.840 are instructed to believe. And if you don't believe them, you're going to be canceled. You might lose

00:01:36.620 your job. You might lose your friends. You might have members of your own family turn on you. And I've

00:01:42.100 never, I'm only pushing 60, but I've never seen this before in my lifetime when you had this raft of

00:01:48.660 beliefs. It reminds me very much of what the communist world was like, what life was like

00:01:53.820 in fascist dictatorships. So if you read history books, do you give just a couple examples? You're

00:02:01.000 not supposed to have a nation. You shall reject your nation. You have to reject your history.

00:02:07.360 The United States is a bad, you know, white supremacist, horrible place that wasn't founded in

00:02:13.060 1776 with the Declaration of Independence, but back in 1619 with the first arrival of

00:02:18.560 chattel slaves. You must not know what a woman is. You must not know what a man is, even though we

00:02:24.880 all know what those things are and can define them very simply. You must trust the media and

00:02:30.420 institutions, even though we can watch those institutions crumble in front of us. And the

00:02:35.460 media has never had lower credibility and lower trust in my lifetime. So you're expected to believe

00:02:42.600 all of these things, even if your own eyes tell you that they are false. And I'm saying that you have

00:02:49.640 to fight. This is the time to stand up for what you believe in and to stand up for truth.

00:02:54.460 Well, I think you're talking our language, but a lot of people say, well, all right,

00:02:57.680 yeah, you know, this has happened to me or it's happened to my neighbor. And in fact, I know several

00:03:03.280 people who are in private business, never mind in government, who have had to go and listen to the

00:03:11.680 DEI presentation and sign off that they've got it. And, you know, any pushback is not appreciated.

00:03:19.720 So how did we go from this being something that happened in left-wing governments to something

00:03:29.000 that happens in fairly non-political or even slightly conservative-minded businesses?

00:03:38.200 That's a fascinating sociological, historical question that we're going to have to answer in

00:03:44.040 the future, I hope, when we vanquish this thing, like the Salem witch trials. You know, at the time,

00:03:48.840 it must have made sense. I mean, the Spanish Inquisition, if you look at medieval Europe,

00:03:53.760 Henry VIII and burning heretics and the Thirty Years' War in Germany, it was a madness that burned

00:03:59.880 over the country that in retrospect looks absolutely insane, but at the time swept along most of the

00:04:05.980 population with it. Look, for companies, it's clear. They're trying to make money. Why did they put

00:04:11.560 Dylan Mulvaney, this man who wants to be a woman, as their spokesperson very briefly for Bud Light

00:04:18.460 beer? Because they wanted to sell more beer.

00:04:21.260 You didn't think that worked, did it? Didn't they lose about $5 billion?

00:04:25.780 It backfired spectacularly, but that was the motive. The reason why they put DEI and there's a,

00:04:32.940 you know, a Pride Month and about 15 other special days set aside for sexual minorities, let's say,

00:04:38.920 is because they're trying to sell more product. So I want to say their hearts aren't really in it.

00:04:44.240 With academia, unfortunately, it is what they are taught from kindergarten through 12th grade.

00:04:51.480 And then when they go to teachers' colleges and even our best universities, our formerly best

00:04:56.160 universities in the Ivy Leagues, they are constantly fed a diet of intersectionality and critical theory

00:05:03.860 and critical race theory and gender ideology so that they have to be pretty tough and have a pretty

00:05:09.840 strong spine to emerge unscathed. So you have these schools feeding into companies and the government

00:05:16.640 in particular, non-governmental organizations, people who are already completely indoctrinated.

00:05:21.640 If you look at the way, and one of my chapters that talk about communist China and the cultural

00:05:26.880 revolution, the way they punished people for thinking independently and freely, and they had these

00:05:32.580 mobs of students running around literally beating up teachers and parents who didn't do what they were

00:05:38.500 told, this is the way it happens. It captures a culture slowly, it creeps up on you, and then all

00:05:44.520 of a sudden, it's out. And then the person who stands up like a J.K. Rowling and says, well, hang on a

00:05:50.360 minute, it isn't right to put a full-grown male rapist in a women's prison. They're the ones who are

00:05:56.700 looked at as the bad guys, and they're the ones who are supposedly speaking hate speech.

00:06:00.840 Looked at by whom? I have anybody who, I mean, okay, I'm a conservative and I run in conservative

00:06:08.980 circles, so I'm probably not going to be exposed to the kind of people who would jump on J.K. Rowling.

00:06:16.080 But, you know, I have a feeling that most people say, well, yeah, you know, and yet she is still

00:06:23.180 criticized by who? People in the media. So, the media have gone woke. I think, I don't think that's

00:06:31.160 news, but again, it goes against common sense and the evidence of your own eyes. And I like to think

00:06:38.720 that people in the media, although some of them are a bit strange, nevertheless believe in truth.

00:06:46.600 That's what gets you into the business in the first place.

00:06:48.980 So, what happens to them? How do they pick it up?

00:06:54.060 Yeah, chapter seven of my book is called You Will Bear False Witness, Trust the Media. And I used to

00:06:59.900 read the New York Times regularly. I used to read the Washington Post. I still kind of do, but it's

00:07:05.740 a painful experience. And these are not the same newspapers that they were 30 years ago. Newspapers

00:07:12.280 are obviously made up of editors and writers, and the culture has shifted. There was a famous meeting,

00:07:17.320 I think it was around 2016, where the editor of the New York Times was meeting with a bunch of younger

00:07:22.180 journalists, and they were essentially telling him, look, we should not be objective as reporters. We

00:07:28.040 should cover every story through a lens of racial justice, social justice, gender ideology, so that

00:07:35.980 we say the right thing. And instead of having an editorial page, and then people who just wrote

00:07:40.880 what they felt was the objective truth and thought and allowed readers to make up their own minds,

00:07:46.180 we now have headlines that essentially are opinion pieces. They're not analysis. And we have articles

00:07:54.600 that are so biased that they should not appear in a straight news section. And I've got example after

00:08:01.340 example in my book from CNN, from the Washington Post, from the New York Times, from USA Today,

00:08:07.400 all of our legacy media, sort of 90% of the media that people consume has lost credibility, which is

00:08:15.340 why they're turning to alternative sites in the United States, like, you know, the Daily Caller and

00:08:20.900 the Daily Signal and the Daily Wire. I don't know why daily is such a popular title, but they're turning

00:08:26.940 to sites where they think they can get something that it may be ideologically based, but at least they're

00:08:33.080 not pretending to be objective. And the objective old school media like CNN are just losing viewers and

00:08:40.680 readers by the Legion. Well, now there's a current example of that. I'd like you to comment on this.

00:08:46.620 A week ago, the U.S. Air Force bombed the Fordow site in Iran. And from what we can tell and from what

00:08:57.380 the Israelis on the ground have reported, did significant damage, enough to set back the Iranian

00:09:03.840 nuclear program for a very long time, if not forever. Then a source, an unnamed source, and

00:09:12.060 therefore completely unaccountable, is supposed to have appeared, which said, no, no, we didn't do that

00:09:18.080 at all. Trump's overblowing what he's done. And it gets picked up by the two institutions that you just

00:09:25.440 mentioned, CNN and the New York Times. I look at that, and I say, that's obviously just sowing a lie

00:09:35.940 so that there is some doubt, so that President Trump cannot be given any credit for anything.

00:09:44.660 It's a little bit like the Russia hoax. There was nothing to it, but it served the purpose of

00:09:53.140 this discrediting him in the eyes of many at a significant time. How do you see this particular

00:10:02.180 story about the, no, we didn't do any damage line that they're taking?

00:10:08.660 Well, first of all, it's very distressing to me as someone who formerly had a top secret

00:10:14.340 clearance and never leaked anything, to have people whose job it is to keep our nation's secrets

00:10:21.440 leaking them for partisan purposes. That disgusts me. I don't care if you agree with it or not.

00:10:26.840 It is your job to keep those secrets. That's why you get paid and why you get a pension.

00:10:30.780 So that's a very distressing phenomenon that now we can't trust some people who are in positions

00:10:36.660 of extreme sensitivity, even in the White House.

00:10:40.080 So you think there really is a source here, and this is not just completely fabricated?

00:10:44.480 I don't know. I don't know. But I do know that there have been a lot of leaks,

00:10:48.260 particularly under the Trump administration, that probably are coming from legitimate sources.

00:10:54.140 And I think that is disgraceful, and anyone who does that should be severely punished.

00:10:58.240 Now, let's look at CNN. In my book, I look at one case. There was a hostage whose name was

00:11:05.800 Hirsch Goldberg-Pollen, and he was kidnapped by Hamas on October 7th. He was kept in captivity. I think

00:11:12.360 his arm had been half blown off, and eventually he was killed. And the headline from CNN, the first

00:11:18.560 headline they had was that Hirsch Goldberg-Pollen has died, as if somehow he had caught an illness and

00:11:27.760 passed away. They took the action verb, they took the responsibility away. And I don't believe that

00:11:33.840 that was accidental, that maybe they just didn't have all the information. Give you another example,

00:11:38.240 in the New York Times, on one day, their headline page, and I wanted to have a picture of this in

00:11:43.520 the book, but they wanted $1,500 for the privilege, so I decided not to. And they had a picture of Kamala

00:11:49.840 Harris sort of looking like this, you know, staring like George Washington off into the distance,

00:11:53.920 looking beautiful and nicely dressed. And then below it, they had a cartoon of Donald Trump as

00:11:59.600 a claymation sort of orange balloon floating in the sky with ridiculous yellow hair, you know?

00:12:06.000 So it's ways like that that they bias the reader. They cover Trump, whether you like him or not,

00:12:12.320 they do not cover him objectively. Every single article on that page was critical of Trump and

00:12:18.160 positive toward Harris. So I'm afraid they start with an agenda, and it's inductive reasoning.

00:12:23.840 They try to prove the point that they want to make. So with this CNN story, I frankly don't know.

00:12:29.760 We obviously, you and I, do not have access to the classified intelligence that the Israelis have,

00:12:34.880 and that hopefully our guys have, that will tell us what really happened. And it may be true that we

00:12:40.000 don't even have accurate reports, because these places, a lot of them were underground,

00:12:44.400 they were extremely well protected, at least as far as the Iranians could protect them.

00:12:48.880 So maybe we don't have incredibly accurate intelligence about what happened. I don't know.

00:12:53.680 But what I don't ever do is believe what I hear coming off the battlefield or the first report after

00:13:00.320 a mass shooting or a bombing or an international event. So it's a twin phenomenon of bad things here.

00:13:08.000 We've got one, people potentially leaking or at least trying to spin things in a way for political

00:13:13.680 advantage and not for the national interest. And then we have media that is deliberately trying

00:13:19.440 to cover it in a way that will minimize any possible advantage to President Trump and maximize

00:13:26.320 criticism. Because look, Trump will make mistakes in foreign policy. Every president does, and he will

00:13:30.800 win some and he will lose some. But when I remember he went to the Middle East, the article was something

00:13:36.320 like, Trump is going to the Middle East. It's all about his family business. And then I looked and two

00:13:40.960 years ago in 2022, Joe Biden went to the Middle East to Saudi Arabia. And the article is about

00:13:45.680 all the good things that Biden was planning to do in the Middle East. And then they allowed Biden to

00:13:50.080 write an opinion piece in their newspaper saying, why I'm going to the Middle East. So the coverage

00:13:56.240 was just, in Trump's case, set up deliberately to make it fail with no interest in the things that

00:14:02.160 he might have done that were positive. And in Biden's case, it was giving him every opportunity to

00:14:07.440 succeed. You know, that's so true. And Simon, I also noticed that in what you've just said,

00:14:15.680 you did something that we all do. You said whether you like Trump or not. And it seems like we have

00:14:23.520 been so conditioned that we have to say that in order to give ourselves permission to say something

00:14:29.840 positive about him, like conceding that, well, really, you know, he's a controversial character.

00:14:34.560 But in this case, you know, like him or not, he may have done a good thing. So it's an unfortunate

00:14:40.720 thing that's been imposed on us. And I guess this is the success of wokeism, that it makes us do those

00:14:48.400 kinds of concessions to an orthodoxy that we don't even subscribe to. I want to take you back to where

00:14:54.400 this comes from. You talked about how it's taught in teachers' training colleges. Well, as a matter of

00:15:03.920 fact, we have corroborative evidence right here in Alberta that that is the case in this conservative

00:15:09.920 province with a conservative government. And yet the teachers' training colleges do use

00:15:20.160 textbooks that basically are awoken in their concept and teach this whole business that you

00:15:28.240 refer to of intersectionality, DEI. Now, OK, we elect politicians. Politicians, we think, control their

00:15:37.200 departments. So should we blame the politicians for this?

00:15:44.720 We can blame politicians who don't make an effort to correct it. But the rod is very deep. There was a

00:15:49.920 Brazilian Marxist or at least far left educator named Paulo Freire who wrote a book, I think,

00:15:56.880 called The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. And this book is sort of...

00:15:59.680 Well, that's actually in there. I gather they use that in Alberta. So...

00:16:03.120 It's required reading in teachers' colleges. And they teach a lot more about leftist theory

00:16:10.080 than they do about how to teach English and math and the sciences and the things that they're actually

00:16:14.640 going to teach to the students. And so it's a rare student that comes out of a teacher's college

00:16:20.080 without this indoctrination. And they have to be exceptionally smart. There are some of them out

00:16:25.280 there and a few of them have websites and podcasts and things. But let's take Florida, for example.

00:16:29.840 You had Governor DeSantis in Florida. There was a part of the University of Florida called New College,

00:16:35.760 which had gone so far down the left wing rabbit hole that they were losing students. They couldn't even

00:16:41.280 recruit enough far left rainbow flag carrying students who were willing to take these ridiculous

00:16:47.600 courses because presumably some of them wanted an education. And even the kids who believed in all

00:16:52.720 that theory felt unsafe on campus because they... Or at least they felt they couldn't express themselves

00:16:57.840 and have conversations. It was like a French Revolution or Chinese Revolution style purity test

00:17:03.600 every time they went out and opened their mouths. So the governor said, all right, well, we can either ditch

00:17:08.400 this or fix it. He decided to fix it. He appointed a new president and a new board and they turned it

00:17:15.200 around. In a couple of years, they got recruitment way above what they wanted. They brought in money.

00:17:20.720 They introduced a sports program. And did it turn conservative overnight? No. And that was never the

00:17:25.600 purpose. We don't want to do the opposite of what they do and have everything be conservative or right

00:17:30.560 wing. We want to have free speech and free expression and create a balance in the universe again,

00:17:36.800 instead of a 95 or 98% left wing bias on our campuses. So I would only fault those politicians

00:17:43.760 who don't even make the effort. We know what the battle is. There's plenty of people out there

00:17:48.240 fighting the fight in the courts, on gender ideology, on parents rights. And we just need to have those

00:17:54.560 politicians support it like they do in Florida and Ohio and in a lot of our states. And like they

00:18:00.240 obviously don't in places like New York and California and Massachusetts.

00:18:05.120 So you just said, we don't want to do what they do. And I'm going to be playing the devil's advocate

00:18:14.000 here a little bit, because actually I agree with you, but we allow, we promote, we appreciate free

00:18:21.360 speech. So the left uses the free speech that we are happy to have, you know, let's have the debate.

00:18:30.800 But once they achieve power, then it stops. And then we are faced with the woke commandments

00:18:39.200 that you're telling us to reject. That's what happens when the left takes over.

00:18:44.320 Sure. So is it actually the smart thing for us to do to not reverse what the left has done?

00:18:56.400 Is it really possible to have a free speech campus, a free speech society?

00:19:03.600 Well, I'm not saying that we shouldn't try to reverse what they've done. I do want to reverse

00:19:07.600 what they've done. I'm just saying if you have a university, for example, where, and there's some,

00:19:11.840 you know, not one single faculty member identifies as a conservative or Republican,

00:19:16.720 then you're not going to get to 50% overnight. You know, you're not going to get to 100% ever.

00:19:22.640 You have to try to fight incrementally in the same with our businesses. You know,

00:19:26.800 you can't replace the entire executive suite overnight. You can't destroy entire institution.

00:19:34.160 Well, you can, but, but that's, you know, in many cases, you're killing the golden goose there.

00:19:38.480 Some of these institutions are worth saving, not all by any means. But I don't see why,

00:19:43.760 for example, the Budweiser beer company, not that it's my favorite beer, but I don't see why they

00:19:48.480 can't, Anheuser-Busch can't get past this and decide that they want to be a company that makes beer

00:19:54.320 people want to drink as opposed to a company that promotes woke ideology. And you're actually seeing

00:20:00.560 many companies pulling back from their subsidies for pride parades and gender ideology because they

00:20:08.240 realize that's not their core business interests. The Los Angeles Dodgers should be playing baseball.

00:20:15.120 They should be fielding a great team and providing a great family experience at a reasonable cost.

00:20:20.640 They should leave immigration enforcement to the federal government as the constitution empowers it.

00:20:25.760 So that's all I'm saying is not that we shouldn't, you know, go for it, but that we have to be

00:20:29.920 realistic in what we can achieve in a short time. This is a generational, it took us a generation

00:20:35.520 to lose this battle to the left. I think we were kind of asleep when all the sixties radicals,

00:20:41.600 you know, the Bill Ayers types and the Bernadine Dorns, you know, they, they went off from throwing

00:20:45.920 hand grenades and trying to kill people to college campuses where they started indoctrinating our,

00:20:52.240 our youth of the time. And now those youth are in their, in their sixties and they've educated

00:20:57.600 two generations. So it's going to take us some time to undo this.

00:21:01.760 So I think a lot of what you've said about the corporate, corporate America, and by the way,

00:21:06.160 corporate Canada too, rolling back their support for woke causes has been attributable to one man,

00:21:14.720 Robbie Starbuck, who's really taken that show on the road and done incredibly well with it.

00:21:19.440 But, uh, the courage of one individual, uh, in a sense of purpose is obviously one of the,

00:21:26.880 one of, one of the takeaways from this discussion is that each individual has to fight this battle.

00:21:32.560 But let me give you a, we're almost out of time, but what can, what encouragement can you give to

00:21:37.760 somebody in this situation? You're, you're working for a bank and, uh, you're at a middle management

00:21:44.880 position. They like you, you're probably going to go further and they pull you in one day and they

00:21:49.200 tell you, well, you need to go to this course. And at the end of the, at the end of the course,

00:21:54.320 we're going to ask you to just, uh, uh, agree on the following suite of, of, uh, uh, woke values,

00:22:02.240 all of which you've enumerated in your book.

00:22:05.440 So there he sits, the kids need braces. The mortgage is not paid off. The, um, the, the,

00:22:14.000 the future is kind of his to grasp, but there is this test of conscience.

00:22:20.720 Do you have any advice for a man or a woman in that position?

00:22:25.200 I did. I had to, I had to be gender equivalent man or woman. Yes. Um, they're in a tough spot.

00:22:33.040 Look, I worked for the federal government for 23 years and I got out, um, just as this was becoming

00:22:38.400 really, really toxic. Um, the pronouns in the bio, it was a suggestion when I retired in 2022,

00:22:45.120 it was a commandment, uh, a year later. And if you are in that position, I fully understand why

00:22:51.280 you can't speak out. You know, we have, um, this thing called the Ben Franklin fellowship,

00:22:55.040 where retired people like me who were in positions in the state department and foreign policy,

00:23:00.000 we could speak freely, but people who support us, uh, who may even support the administration's

00:23:04.800 policies, um, they have to keep quiet and they have to do their, their jobs. If you work in a company

00:23:10.640 and that company has a policy of putting pronouns in the bio and you kind of buck that trend,

00:23:14.880 it might make your life difficult. Like you say, you got bills to pay, but here's what I advise.

00:23:18.640 Every one of my chapters ends with, uh, somebody to follow on social media, uh, with a good book to

00:23:24.080 read and with an organization that's working in, in a field. Um, and I think advancing the cause in

00:23:29.520 the right direction. Those are just some suggestions. You talked about Robbie Starbuck.

00:23:33.600 I think he's actually associated with the heritage foundation now too. Uh, Chris Rufo from the

00:23:37.680 Manhattan Institute has done incredible work. Um, and there are other, um, whistleblowers out

00:23:42.400 there and people writing about it. Lior Sapir at Manhattan Institute, writing about gender ideology.

00:23:47.040 Um, you should blow that whistle. You should let those guys know, shine the light of public interest

00:23:53.200 on your company. If they're doing something that's illegal, for example, they have scholarships open

00:23:58.320 or internships only to people of one color or one sex. Once people find out about that,

00:24:03.600 uh, that company might change their minds. The department of justice has gone from suing fire

00:24:08.640 departments for not hiring enough women, uh, and, and police departments for not hiring enough people

00:24:13.280 of color to actually enforcing civil rights law. And they are going after under Harmeet Dillon,

00:24:19.600 uh, companies that are the discriminate against people for reasons that are illegal. So I think

00:24:25.840 the way to go, if you're in that company is maybe not always to stand up and, and, you know, put your,

00:24:31.280 your hand in the air and maybe get struck by corporate lightning. Uh, but to let somebody know

00:24:37.120 and make the company defend that policy. And if it's defensible, great. Uh, but if it's illegal,

00:24:42.560 then people will find out and they may have to experience some, uh, some litigation.

00:24:48.160 Okay. Now I did say that I would come back to you for, uh, uh, a quick progress check on Canadian,

00:24:54.640 uh, border administration. Are we doing any better?

00:24:59.200 I, I have not heard anything about the Northern border in weeks.

00:25:04.560 Um, I would say that's pretty good. I would say no news is good news. Um,

00:25:10.160 I will say this purely personally, I don't meddle in other countries politics. Um,

00:25:14.400 but I was very impressed by, uh, Pierre Poilievre. Uh, I will never forget his, uh,

00:25:19.440 his destruction of a reporter while he was eating an apple. And I thought he would have been a fantastic,

00:25:24.800 um, counterpart to have North of the border, especially after you've experimented with what,

00:25:29.520 10, 12 years of, uh, uh, Justin Trudeau's liberal government. Uh, but Hey, you guys get to pick your,

00:25:35.040 your leaders and I wish you all the best with that. Um, on the border,

00:25:39.120 I sense that things have improved, uh, on the Southern border. Things are 90 plus percent

00:25:44.480 better in terms of illegal crossers. And we have enforcement in the interior of people who are

00:25:49.760 here illegally. And fortunately they're not Canadians because you guys can come here under

00:25:54.080 so many legal ways. Um, and we have so much positive trade with Canada. So I don't want to,

00:25:58.720 I'm going to touch wood as I say this, but I feel like, uh, between the U S and Canada,

00:26:02.320 things are looking better. That's wonderful news, Simon. Look, it's always a pleasure to have you

00:26:08.560 on the show. So thank you again. I think this is your third time. It's a, it's really good to see

00:26:13.440 us. Uh, so, uh, so God bless. And for the Western standard, I'm Nigel Hannaford.

HANNAFORD： Fighting woke, see something, say something

Episode Stats

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript