00:14:38.860Well, it's very interesting that you raise this, Nigel, because, you see, the industry in Alberta, particularly in the oil sands, has been coasting along for a decade and more on investment that was made basically before 2015.
00:14:58.840uh there really has not been any new productive capacity uh a greenfield productive capacity
00:15:06.780created there's been you know incremental increases in uh the capacity of existing
00:15:12.740plants to produce more oil but basically for over a decade we've not added to our productive capacity
00:15:20.220in the in the oil sand uh but during all that time we've been applying you know typical alberta
00:15:27.980ingenuity and and driving down the cost of producing a barrel of oil out of the oil sands
00:15:33.900from this productive capacity that we created decades ago that it means that you know the
00:15:40.540the we've been driving down the production costs oil prices have to be quite high right now i mean
00:15:46.300the existing productive capacity in alberta is is really fantastically profitable uh and so
00:15:54.220it's attracting uh i i think international players to want to get a a piece of that action
00:16:01.260but it's very important to understand that what we really need now is uh the ability to get
00:16:08.700greenfield sites going you know to do the kind of upfront investment that would create
00:16:15.100larger productive capacity over time and that i don't see happening yet because you know much
00:16:21.100as mark carney says he uh he wants to see this happen you know we've got the egress problem that
00:16:27.020we talked about east and west we've got uh you know the carbon capture and storage uh uh obstacle
00:16:33.420that he attaches to uh to new egress and new productive capacity i mean he's he's he talks a
00:16:40.700good game but my view is that he's not at all creating the conditions in which it's worthwhile
00:16:46.700to invest in new productive capacity in Alberta. So the oil majors are attracted to the profitability
00:16:54.620of what already exists, but what we in Canada really need is to increase that productive
00:16:59.700capacity. And we're not there yet, as far as I can see. Do you think Mr. Carney understands
00:17:06.340what Donald Trump is doing the way that you understand it? Is there any evidence?
00:17:10.620well you know my reading of mark carney is that he is he is perfectly happy to take short-term
00:17:24.760political advantage of say canadian's unhappiness with donald trump and you know look
00:17:30.660i can't disagree that donald trump has said many offensive things and he's insulted canadians and
00:17:36.960I get that but you know Mark Carney has taken that and turned it into an entire political brand
00:17:44.400and he has invested not just the government of Canada but the the future interests of Canada in
00:17:49.840an anti-American extravaganza which I think really harms our national interests in the long run and
00:17:58.160I think he understands perfectly well what he's doing and he's willing to he's willing to take
00:18:03.920short-term political advantage over promoting the long-term interests of canada i actually think
00:18:09.920this is quite a shameful position to occupy well i think you find lots of support for that point
00:18:16.800of view here in alberta where many people do not like the messaging that's coming out of eastern
00:18:23.840canada central canada and there is as you probably know quite a strong independence movement in in
00:18:33.040alberta that will come to a head in october but meanwhile it's no surprise to us that mr
00:18:40.400carney may want to take a short-term advantage to his political benefit but why does this sell so
00:18:46.080well in central canada well you know there's an historian who once said that uh a canadian is the
00:18:55.760perfect anti-american anti-american as imagined in the mind of god you know there there is an
00:19:01.840anti-american streak in canada there always has been uh it's it's kind of inevitable sharing the
00:19:09.200continent with the united states but you know we've always been able to sublimate or submerge this
00:19:18.480kind of anti-american reflex uh because we understand that our our fates are inevitably
00:19:25.920tied together our two countries in in in north america and i i'm i'm sorry that uh donald trump
00:19:34.160has you know uh used his traditional negotiating strategy which is to so outrage his negotiating
00:19:43.280partners that they lose the ability to focus on their own interests and i think canadians fall
00:19:47.680for it every time and you know what he's done is said outrageous things and canadians say how
00:19:55.360dare he say that to us? And Mark Carney has said, yes, exactly. And if you support me politically,
00:20:00.680I will find us alternatives to the United States. The fact of the matter is, though, as Margaret
00:20:05.840Thatcher used to say, there is no alternative. The idea that there is some substitute for our
00:20:13.120relationship with the United States is, in my estimation, completely fanciful. Can we sell more
00:20:20.600to other people of course we can should we do so of course we should but that's not the same as
00:20:28.040saying that there is some alternative to our relationship with the united states because
00:20:32.940there isn't i i just very quickly because i know we don't have a lot of time but i i'll just point
00:20:38.280out that you know he talks sometimes about we should join the european union we're the most
00:20:42.380european non-european country blah blah blah blah blah we negotiated a free trade agreement
00:20:48.420with europe uh came into effect in 2015 so it's been in effect for 10 years so we already have
00:20:55.620free trade with europe in 2015 we sent 10 of our exports to the european union now 10 years later
00:21:03.700after 10 years of free trade with europe what share of our exports are we sending to europe
00:21:08.18010 in other words it hasn't the existence of a free trade agreement with europe hasn't changed
00:21:14.420one iota the extent to which uh we are reliant on europe as opposed to america so0.66
00:21:24.580what is this alternative is it going to be china the people who kidnap our citizens who weaponize0.66
00:21:31.060trade relationships you know the they japan became reliant on trade with china the first0.87
00:21:36.980thing china did was to institute a rare earth export ban which has a a dagger aimed at the
00:21:42.980the industrial heart of Japan. I mean, talk about out of the frying pan and into the fire. If I'm
00:21:49.560choosing between a country that engages in slave labor and weaponization of trade and0.84
00:21:55.420opens police stations on my soil to intimidate Chinese-Canadian, as opposed to the relationship0.99
00:22:05.500that we have with the United States, I will choose that relationship with the United States0.99