As Western economies raced to reduce carbon emissions to save the world, many lost sight of the vital contribution fossil fuels make to economic resilience and national security. With me today to talk about what this means for Canada and the world is author and political economist, Brian Lee Crowley.
00:14:38.860Well, it's very interesting that you raise this, Nigel, because, you see, the industry in Alberta, particularly in the oil sands, has been coasting along for a decade and more on investment that was made basically before 2015.
00:14:58.840uh there really has not been any new productive capacity uh a greenfield productive capacity
00:15:06.780created there's been you know incremental increases in uh the capacity of existing
00:15:12.740plants to produce more oil but basically for over a decade we've not added to our productive capacity
00:15:20.220in the in the oil sand uh but during all that time we've been applying you know typical alberta
00:15:27.980ingenuity and and driving down the cost of producing a barrel of oil out of the oil sands
00:15:33.900from this productive capacity that we created decades ago that it means that you know the
00:15:40.540the we've been driving down the production costs oil prices have to be quite high right now i mean
00:15:46.300the existing productive capacity in alberta is is really fantastically profitable uh and so
00:15:54.220it's attracting uh i i think international players to want to get a a piece of that action
00:16:01.260but it's very important to understand that what we really need now is uh the ability to get
00:16:08.700greenfield sites going you know to do the kind of upfront investment that would create
00:16:15.100larger productive capacity over time and that i don't see happening yet because you know much
00:16:21.100as mark carney says he uh he wants to see this happen you know we've got the egress problem that
00:16:27.020we talked about east and west we've got uh you know the carbon capture and storage uh uh obstacle
00:16:33.420that he attaches to uh to new egress and new productive capacity i mean he's he's he talks a
00:16:40.700good game but my view is that he's not at all creating the conditions in which it's worthwhile
00:16:46.700to invest in new productive capacity in Alberta. So the oil majors are attracted to the profitability
00:16:54.620of what already exists, but what we in Canada really need is to increase that productive
00:16:59.700capacity. And we're not there yet, as far as I can see. Do you think Mr. Carney understands
00:17:06.340what Donald Trump is doing the way that you understand it? Is there any evidence?
00:17:10.620well you know my reading of mark carney is that he is he is perfectly happy to take short-term
00:17:24.760political advantage of say canadian's unhappiness with donald trump and you know look
00:17:30.660i can't disagree that donald trump has said many offensive things and he's insulted canadians and
00:17:36.960I get that but you know Mark Carney has taken that and turned it into an entire political brand
00:17:44.400and he has invested not just the government of Canada but the the future interests of Canada in
00:17:49.840an anti-American extravaganza which I think really harms our national interests in the long run and
00:17:58.160I think he understands perfectly well what he's doing and he's willing to he's willing to take
00:18:03.920short-term political advantage over promoting the long-term interests of canada i actually think
00:18:09.920this is quite a shameful position to occupy well i think you find lots of support for that point
00:18:16.800of view here in alberta where many people do not like the messaging that's coming out of eastern
00:18:23.840canada central canada and there is as you probably know quite a strong independence movement in in
00:18:33.040alberta that will come to a head in october but meanwhile it's no surprise to us that mr
00:18:40.400carney may want to take a short-term advantage to his political benefit but why does this sell so
00:18:46.080well in central canada well you know there's an historian who once said that uh a canadian is the
00:18:55.760perfect anti-american anti-american as imagined in the mind of god you know there there is an
00:19:01.840anti-american streak in canada there always has been uh it's it's kind of inevitable sharing the
00:19:09.200continent with the united states but you know we've always been able to sublimate or submerge this
00:19:18.480kind of anti-american reflex uh because we understand that our our fates are inevitably
00:19:25.920tied together our two countries in in in north america and i i'm i'm sorry that uh donald trump
00:19:34.160has you know uh used his traditional negotiating strategy which is to so outrage his negotiating
00:19:43.280partners that they lose the ability to focus on their own interests and i think canadians fall
00:19:47.680for it every time and you know what he's done is said outrageous things and canadians say how
00:19:55.360dare he say that to us? And Mark Carney has said, yes, exactly. And if you support me politically,
00:20:00.680I will find us alternatives to the United States. The fact of the matter is, though, as Margaret
00:20:05.840Thatcher used to say, there is no alternative. The idea that there is some substitute for our
00:20:13.120relationship with the United States is, in my estimation, completely fanciful. Can we sell more
00:20:20.600to other people of course we can should we do so of course we should but that's not the same as
00:20:28.040saying that there is some alternative to our relationship with the united states because
00:20:32.940there isn't i i just very quickly because i know we don't have a lot of time but i i'll just point
00:20:38.280out that you know he talks sometimes about we should join the european union we're the most
00:20:42.380european non-european country blah blah blah blah blah we negotiated a free trade agreement
00:20:48.420with europe uh came into effect in 2015 so it's been in effect for 10 years so we already have
00:20:55.620free trade with europe in 2015 we sent 10 of our exports to the european union now 10 years later
00:21:03.700after 10 years of free trade with europe what share of our exports are we sending to europe
00:21:08.18010 in other words it hasn't the existence of a free trade agreement with europe hasn't changed
00:21:14.420one iota the extent to which uh we are reliant on europe as opposed to america so0.66
00:21:24.580what is this alternative is it going to be china the people who kidnap our citizens who weaponize0.66
00:21:31.060trade relationships you know the they japan became reliant on trade with china the first0.87
00:21:36.980thing china did was to institute a rare earth export ban which has a a dagger aimed at the
00:21:42.980the industrial heart of Japan. I mean, talk about out of the frying pan and into the fire. If I'm
00:21:49.560choosing between a country that engages in slave labor and weaponization of trade and0.84
00:21:55.420opens police stations on my soil to intimidate Chinese-Canadian, as opposed to the relationship0.99
00:22:05.500that we have with the United States, I will choose that relationship with the United States0.99