Western Standard - August 16, 2026


HANNAFORD: When the police knock on your door, grab your phone and record


Episode Stats


Length

26 minutes

Words per minute

140.51

Word count

3,695

Sentence count

105

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Good evening, Western Standard viewers, and welcome to Hannaford, a weekly politics show
00:00:20.400 of the Western Standard. It is Thursday, August the 14th. I'm joined today by John Carpe,
00:00:26.720 president of the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms. He founded the Justice Center in 2010
00:00:32.560 to focus on defending Canadians' constitutional freedoms, especially charter rights through
00:00:38.000 litigation and education. He has been a fearless advocate for free speech rights in all of his
00:00:46.640 career as a constitutional lawyer. We had an interesting incident the other day, a story
00:00:53.600 that the Western Standard reported, in which the Edmonton police were checking on people
00:01:02.720 who made non-criminal hate speech remarks, the sort of thing that you might read a story
00:01:09.880 and put a comment on and send them all back.
00:01:12.880 It's not against the law, but it's probably a little insensitive.
00:01:17.760 But at any rate, it's not against the law.
00:01:20.400 So, John, welcome to the show.
00:01:23.760 Tell us about what seems like a very English approach to non-hate crimes.
00:01:33.080 The English approach hits the nail on the head.
00:01:35.860 Before I dive into the Edmonton police, I will say that they started around the year 2000.
00:01:42.680 The police started recording non-crime hate incidents.
00:01:48.880 And what started out, you know, with good intentions, it was to, I guess, stop the spread of hate in society, I guess, use the law or law enforcement to get people to be nicer to each other.
00:02:03.460 right almost all laws have have good intentions but it got to the point where uh just last year
00:02:12.500 thousands of people uh so 25 years later we've got thousands and thousands of british people
00:02:19.820 who've had the police knocking on their door because they sent an anti-immigration tweet
00:02:26.100 we've got people spending time in jail
00:02:28.220 in March of
00:02:29.820 2026, so roughly half
00:02:32.160 a year ago, they've now
00:02:33.940 formally abandoned, at least
00:02:35.980 they've announced that they're abandoning, I don't know what's
00:02:37.900 happening in practice, but after
00:02:39.820 25 years of non-crime hate incidents
00:02:42.260 the United Kingdom is backing
00:02:44.080 away from that
00:02:45.740 model at the same time that
00:02:47.940 we seem to be embarking on it here in Canada
00:02:49.900 So that's
00:02:53.040 so what's the crime here?
00:02:55.320 you're talking about a non-crime hate incident why do the police trouble themselves with non-crimes
00:03:03.260 well this is the big problem that i see with the edmonton police and apparently there are
00:03:08.860 police forces all over canada anecdotally that are saying uh if you have a non-hate uh a crime
00:03:16.900 if there's a racial slur if there's an offensive joke if there's a you know you people should go
00:03:22.480 back to where you came from or all of the worst drivers on the road belong to this or that racial
00:03:29.040 or ethnic group, that those types of comments should be reported to police. The big problem
00:03:34.020 with that is that police already have limited resources to do law enforcement in relation to
00:03:41.280 actual crimes. I hear anecdotally that if your car is stolen or you come back to your home to find it
00:03:47.080 broken into and family heirloom jewelry taken away, the home is ransacked, that your car is
00:03:54.560 vandalized. Police practically shrug their shoulders. You can fill out a report, but they
00:04:00.200 don't have the resources to investigate, to go looking after this. So they're already
00:04:04.800 shorthanded in relation to real crimes. So if you have a speech that is offensive, hurtful,
00:04:13.820 uh unkind ugly false uh that is not criminal police should not be uh inviting people to
00:04:23.260 report any non-crimes simply by virtue of the fact that their resources are limited and they
00:04:28.440 don't have enough resources as it is now to to fight actual crimes well again i think the
00:04:37.640 question is still if it's not a crime and they're short-staffed anyway why do they do this
00:04:47.000 i think it's the woke neo-marxist ideology of equity diversity inclusion that has infiltrated
00:04:53.480 uh canadian culture canadian institutions the police the crown prosecutors the judiciary the
00:04:59.320 universities certainly the government-funded media and this woke neo-marxist ideology of
00:05:07.080 equity diversity inclusion basically says that society is in a state of war oppressors versus
00:05:14.680 oppressed and the oppressors are men and straight people and light-skinned people
00:05:20.840 and the victims of oppression are women and dark-skinned people and lgbtq people and so 0.88
00:05:27.800 we're in a state of war this ideology is what gets the groups an institution like the edmonton
00:05:34.920 police to put on its website uh send us non-criminal you know send us report speech that
00:05:45.480 that you find offensive that is not criminal and by the way the the edmonton police and every other
00:05:50.680 police force in canada they do have a responsibility to enforce the criminal code hate speech provisions
00:05:56.920 so if somebody said that a certain identifiable group uh you know based on their religion or race
00:06:03.960 that that they should all be massacred we're advocating for genocide we're saying that
00:06:08.520 these people are you know horrible when you have willful promotion of hatred police have a right 0.97
00:06:14.840 and an obligation to investigate okay the problem here they're not saying report hate speech and
00:06:22.760 then define hate speech and make it clear what it is they're saying just deport uh report to us
00:06:28.200 racial slurs and you know offensive jokes and what are they going to do about it it's not illegal
00:06:36.360 so well they keep the information on file which is creepy and it lays the foundation for
00:06:42.600 becoming more aggressive in the future because in the united kingdom starting in the year 2000
00:06:49.720 the you they were not the police were not immediately at that point arresting people
00:06:54.680 and locking people up over there or threatening people over their uh tweets on social media but
00:07:01.560 over time that's where it led to and so what the edmonton police are doing right now and other
00:07:06.520 police forces uh that lays the foundation for moving towards a place where you have police
00:07:13.080 knocking on your door uh because they don't like what you said about canada's immigration policy
00:07:19.180 So to be clear, if a person makes a comment about Canada's immigration policy that somebody reports as being hateful but non-criminal, the police knock on the door, then what?
00:07:35.260 First thing you do when you've got police knocking on your door is take out your cell phone and hit the record button or have a family member record the interaction.
00:07:44.140 That's very important so that you don't become a victim of bullying and intimidation.
00:07:47.940 just in case there's a bad police officer that's going to bully you, threaten you,
00:07:54.240 and intimidate you over what you've said.
00:07:57.060 So first response, turn on your cell phone and start recording the incident,
00:08:03.600 and then listen to what the officer has to say.
00:08:05.820 And you can say, look, am I being charged with criminal hate speech
00:08:10.240 under Section 319 of the criminal code?
00:08:13.580 And if the answer is no, you say, okay, what do you want?
00:08:16.800 What are you doing here?
00:08:17.940 And if the policeman was to say, well, you know, we're just concerned about, you know, what you said on Twitter yesterday, say, you know what, I don't want to continue the conversation.
00:08:30.500 You can leave now.
00:08:32.420 Police have no business knocking on your door unless there's a crime or they're investigating a crime.
00:08:37.620 They can knock on your door and ask you for information to help solve a crime.
00:08:42.700 But if they're there to intimidate you over what you've said, then no.
00:08:49.620 But record it. Record the incident.
00:08:52.780 Okay. But be polite.
00:08:56.100 Of course. Absolutely.
00:08:58.560 Okay. So it is an exercise in intimidation when people use their free speech rights.
00:09:05.620 To be clear, there are limits to free speech, but they are nowhere near as narrow as what
00:09:12.340 the woke crowd would like you to believe. Certainly, telling an ethnic joke is not
00:09:23.380 in the in the barred zone now surely the government of alberta has some influence in this i mean
00:09:37.060 daniel smith hearing about this incident which just came out about 10 days ago uh has directed
00:09:44.340 the alberta police to focus on violent crime rather than non-criminal hate speech from a
00:09:52.020 constitutional standpoint how significant is that does she have any power here
00:09:58.420 well legally the edmonton police reports to the city of edmonton but they are also under
00:10:04.020 the supervision of the solicitor general uh the the justice also known as justice minister
00:10:12.100 so the on a province-wide basis the solicitor general can formulate policy
00:10:21.300 and can provide policy guidance he shouldn't be in the business of he should never be neither
00:10:27.300 the premier nor anybody in cabinet should be micromanaging and telling the police to
00:10:31.540 go after so-and-so and not go after so-and-so so there's you know there's not to be any
00:10:35.700 interference whatsoever with the actual daily law enforcement and against whom charges will be
00:10:43.060 laid or not etc um but as a matter of policy there the province does have jurisdiction over
00:10:50.900 policing and the province can order the police to refrain from recording non-criminal
00:11:02.580 incidents of any kind or more narrowly they can tell the police you're not to spend resources on
00:11:12.180 recruiting asking for people to report non-criminal hate speech they shouldn't be asking for it right
00:11:19.860 they can't control what comes in the door. Okay. The police would probably still receive,
00:11:25.720 there'd be people that would file complaints and say, you know, this joke I heard at the party
00:11:29.700 last night, I think it's criminal hate speech. The police can't control what comes in the door
00:11:34.860 and they might have to look at it and go, well, no, it was a terrible joke, but it doesn't qualify
00:11:40.660 as criminal hate speech. But what police should not be doing is actively seeking out and asking
00:11:46.760 members of the public to report non-crimes because it's a poor use of resources that's
00:11:51.880 that's the bottom line so yeah i guess my question is the relationship between the
00:11:57.320 police officers engaged in this activity and the federal government because between the two of them
00:12:03.400 stands a police commission i mean i think all the cities which have their own municipal police
00:12:08.600 forces will have a police commission to supervise the day-to-day operations as the police force
00:12:17.400 enforces the criminal code and other legislation that it's called upon to do so when the premier
00:12:25.560 of a province i mean it happens to be daniel but just in general terms when the premier of a
00:12:30.280 province says we need to crack down on drunken driving i would take that as an expectation that
00:12:38.120 the police would want to crack down on drunk driving, whatever the police commission says.
00:12:45.160 But here we have a situation where under the cover, I must assume, of the police commission
00:12:53.000 in Edmonton, the Edmonton Police Service is looking for these examples of non-criminal
00:12:59.160 hate speech. Does the Attorney General's office get involved here? Does it matter that the
00:13:07.080 the premier says, cut it out.
00:13:10.560 Well, Margaret Thatcher once said,
00:13:12.940 never underestimate the power of making a statement
00:13:16.980 as to what is going to transpire.
00:13:20.140 Now, that's not a law, but it's an interesting point.
00:13:23.400 I mean, often when a premier or a prime minister federally
00:13:28.440 or the mayor of a city, when they announce
00:13:31.680 what their view is and what they would like to see done,
00:13:36.680 it carries a political and moral and psychological impact.
00:13:43.680 And so the very fact that the premier has said this,
00:13:47.760 premier's comments, whoever the premier is,
00:13:50.540 whatever the province, they're not easily ignored.
00:13:54.920 And so there is certainly a political
00:13:57.920 and psychological impact to it, which is very positive.
00:14:02.400 Now, in terms of the legislation,
00:14:03.800 I have not had an opportunity to look at the police act,
00:14:06.140 but the Police Act does empower the province to set general policy.
00:14:10.440 We've heard this some time ago where it was said that the confiscation of private property,
00:14:18.380 namely the firearms owned by law-abiding people,
00:14:22.420 I believe there's an announcement that the Alberta police in Alberta would not be spending a lot of time on that.
00:14:32.120 So there is that provincial control over policing policy.
00:14:39.960 All right.
00:14:40.580 Well, critics will say, John, that Smith's position gives cover to genuine bigotry.
00:14:46.080 How do you respond to that argument that de-emphasizes hate speech complaints that may endanger vulnerable groups?
00:14:56.240 It's a reasonable thing to ask.
00:14:57.940 you know hate is an emotion and it's entirely subjective what somebody views as as hateful or
00:15:08.320 not i'll give you a very an example that will resonate with a lot of people something we've
00:15:13.540 heard a lot in the last two years or so is the slogan from the river to the sea palestine will
00:15:18.740 be free now some people hear that and they say it's it's hateful anti-semitic genocidal it wants
00:15:24.940 to drive the Jews into the sea and destroy the state of Israel.
00:15:29.960 Other people say, no, no, no, it's just a political slogan. 0.96
00:15:32.660 It's about freedom.
00:15:33.480 It's about justice, human rights for Palestinians.
00:15:36.420 You know, there is an example.
00:15:37.700 Is that a hateful slogan?
00:15:39.120 Yes or no?
00:15:40.460 That really is a subjective assessment.
00:15:44.400 And so the moment that you have hate speech on the books as a crime,
00:15:50.280 as we do in Canada, you've got a political aspect to it.
00:15:54.940 where politically vocal and politically powerful influential minority like the LGBTQ community,
00:16:03.580 they're going to give, I'll give you a practical example. You've got two cases in Alberta,
00:16:09.500 supposedly the freest province in Canada. We've got a human rights commission that is prosecuting
00:16:16.700 a lady for saying that the crosswalk in her town should remain black and white as public property,
00:16:23.340 should not be replaced with a rainbow crosswalk because that is a controversial political
00:16:28.300 symbol she now is facing human rights proceedings over what she said she didn't discriminate
00:16:34.300 against anybody she just stated her opinion that she doesn't want a rainbow crosswalk in her town 0.76
00:16:41.020 another lady said publicly that a so-called family friendly drag queen show is by definition
00:16:49.580 not family friendly because a drag queen show isn't family friendly she's facing a human rights 0.89
00:16:55.820 complaint the justice center is providing lawyers for both ladies this is what happens when you try
00:17:03.740 to outlaw speech it it immediately becomes very political and if you're part of a favorite minority
00:17:11.900 then you get protection but if you're not part of a favorite minority you don't get protection and
00:17:16.860 that's yeah that's the problem well john the justice center has litigated a number of free
00:17:22.460 speech cases uh just think for a minute which which recent canadian examples for you best
00:17:29.500 illustrate the risk of expanding hate beyond the criminal threshold i mean what you're just talking
00:17:34.700 about well there was a human rights commission that's a whole different animal but when we're
00:17:39.340 talking about the police looking at non-criminal hate speech well what is what are the risks
00:17:47.180 of expanding hate beyond the criminal threshold we are acting for a citizens group in new brunswick
00:17:54.620 that was handing out flyers against the policy of keeping parents in the dark about what's going on
00:18:04.460 with their own kids at school when it comes to promoting transgender ideology to children so
00:18:10.220 citizens distributed flyers the flyers said that parents have a right to know what's going on with
00:18:15.500 their own kids and we shouldn't be promoting transgender ideology on children so the there's
00:18:22.780 human rights complaint there the justice center is providing lawyers uh there's a case in british
00:18:27.500 columbia a very new felt uh former school board trustee from the city of chilliwack 750 000
00:18:34.700 that he has to pay to some lgbtq teachers why because he said that it's not good to promote
00:18:41.500 transgender ideology against children now this is not in either case it's not hate speech criminally
00:18:48.140 but it's that same mentality that you know you're saying something is really offensive because you're
00:18:53.260 transphobic supposedly so we're going to go after you with the force of the state
00:18:58.380 and try to silence you and that's not a free country 0.52
00:19:04.220 so i think that alberta maybe have a little different view of things certainly the premier
00:19:11.980 does so looking ahead john what legal or policy changes would you like to see in alberta
00:19:19.340 to put clearer guardrails around
00:19:22.560 around non-criminal speech investigations
00:19:26.100 is there anything that we can do to just
00:19:28.260 keep the old free speech ethic pure and alive
00:19:31.700 repeal section 3 from the alberta human rights act
00:19:35.600 and your problem is solved
00:19:37.060 section 3 prohibits discriminatory signs
00:19:41.700 now that's already if that refers only to 0.80
00:19:46.500 you know, a landlord can't, you know, put up a sign saying, I don't want any Jews or blacks or 0.96
00:19:54.840 whatever as tenants. But that's already covered by all the other sections of the act. What's 1.00
00:20:01.360 happening now is that the two different, the two ladies that were representing in the two 1.00
00:20:06.960 different human rights complaints, is section three, that is enabling these political prosecutions 0.99
00:20:14.100 against these two women simply for expressing their opinions.
00:20:18.040 And so we should scrap section three and all of the other,
00:20:21.960 the rest of the human rights code that prohibits discrimination in goods and
00:20:25.780 services, you know, restaurants and renting out apartments and hiring and
00:20:29.680 firing and promotion. All of those human rights
00:20:32.520 provisions will stay on the books,
00:20:36.580 but repeal section three and you no longer have a threat to our free speech
00:20:41.500 in Alberta.
00:20:42.340 John, when I was growing up, and I suspect that when you were a much younger man, the
00:20:49.660 common consensus was that everybody had a right to their own opinion and within certain
00:20:56.100 very wide limits to express it.
00:21:00.100 I wonder if that is still a widely held view these days.
00:21:06.000 Do people actually care about free speech anymore?
00:21:10.460 We've probably had a cultural shift away from appreciation for free speech and the same, but that's similar too. We've moved away from healthy appreciation of religious freedom, freedom of association, peaceful assembly, travel movement.
00:21:27.540 There were an awful lot of Canadians who, you know, cheerfully and enthusiastically gave up their rights and freedoms in 2020 during the lockdowns.
00:21:37.480 Having said that, I think most Canadians still appreciate and cherish freedom of speech.
00:21:44.080 One of the challenges is that people don't understand that if you give the state, the government, the power to determine what is true or false and what you can and cannot say, that that will be used against you.
00:21:56.680 And what I mean is you have you have people saying we can't we can't have hateful we can't have racist speech.
00:22:06.840 OK, give you an example. People hear that and go, well, I'm not a racist. I'm against racism.
00:22:11.540 I don't see I don't say racist things. So, yeah, let's have a let's pass a law against racist speech.
00:22:18.720 Well, now you've got a problem because now the government gets to decide what is or is not racist.
00:22:23.100 and somebody could say, you know, we need fewer immigrants in Canada, or we need to better screen
00:22:28.820 immigrants. So we're only getting people who love Canadian values. The government could say,
00:22:35.740 well, that's racist. It isn't a racist statement, but the government could say it is, and now you're
00:22:40.300 in trouble. So there's a practical example. People don't think it through. They think, well, you're
00:22:45.660 just going to go after racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic speech. And I don't say any of those
00:22:52.920 bad things myself so you go ahead and you censor those people well if the government can shut up
00:22:59.300 one group because they are now uh you know politically weak or because they're unpopular
00:23:05.400 then government can shut up anybody else and everybody else as well i guess that's one of
00:23:10.860 the reasons when all the famous free speech cases that you ever review uh you tend to sort of not
00:23:18.280 like the guy who was charged very much. Those difficult cases are where these things are
00:23:23.720 determined. So I do wonder, John, whether people care about it as much as we used to care about it,
00:23:36.120 days gone by, that they're happier with control and knowing where the limits are and don't much
00:23:45.080 care about remember that old uh saying attributed uh to to um
00:23:53.560 voltaire i didn't actually say it but uh somebody else much later but you know i may not agree with
00:23:59.640 your opinion but i will defend with my life your right to to express it i don't think people think
00:24:05.560 like that anymore do they you have fewer people thinking that way we have to remember and don't
00:24:13.320 Don't get me wrong. I mean, free speech is in trouble in Canada. Absolutely.
00:24:17.300 And all of our rights and freedoms, many of them are under very aggressive assault because of this woke neo-Marxist ideology that we have to fight back against tooth and nail.
00:24:28.460 Well, peacefully, we fight back against peacefully. We don't use violence, but we have to fight very hard against it.
00:24:35.560 We have to remember as well, though, we compared to other countries in the world today and compared to other time periods in history, we Canadians in 2026 have an awful lot of free expression left over.
00:24:49.180 The fact that you and I are having this interview, the fact that people are freely criticizing the government and government policy, the fact that there's this citizen pushback against police wasting resources on trying to keep track of non-criminal behavior, we have a lot of free speech left in Canada.
00:25:08.540 So as long as we continue to exercise it, then that is the key to preserving it.
00:25:14.100 Free speech is like a muscle.
00:25:15.760 If you don't exercise your muscles, they atrophy.
00:25:17.860 if we don't exercise our muscle of free speech
00:25:21.580 that muscle will also atrophy
00:25:23.860 so that's the key point
00:25:26.040 Okay John, that's a good note to end it upon
00:25:29.200 and a hopeful one at that
00:25:30.440 so my compliments to you on the great work
00:25:33.440 done by the Justice Center
00:25:34.880 not only in this file but in so many others
00:25:37.320 God bless, keep doing it
00:25:40.040 Will do, thanks for having me on your show
00:25:42.660 For the Western Standard, I'm Nigel Hannaford
00:25:47.860 Thank you.