Mountain Standard Time - Episode 45.5 The Epilogue
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 33 minutes
Words per Minute
197.95343
Summary
In our final show before Hiatus, we speak about the BC wildfire, the pandemic, the lockdowns, and the federal election. We also discuss the need for a radical rethinking of the social contract and the need to rethink the political contract itself.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
hello and welcome to mountain standard time i'm your host nathan guida and today i'm joined by
00:00:12.220
aaron ackman for our final show before hiatus we're going to speak a little bit of the bc
00:00:17.180
wildfire situation and a few other odds and ends that are going to come up of course the federal
00:00:21.020
election is looming and we'll comment on that uh stewart parker sends his regrets he could not be
00:00:25.840
here today uh and he's traveling in the midst while but we are going to have aaron on and it's
00:00:31.060
going to be a grand old time for this last show before hiatus my final statement for the mountain
00:00:37.460
standard time platform before we go on our little break here is the following so technically this
00:00:43.480
episode would have been the 46th but i figured 45 numbered shows with an epilogue was more poetic
00:00:49.620
i want to begin by saying that i'm very thankful to all of our friends and our fans and for that
00:00:54.940
matter our foes and our commenters as well as detractors uh your contributions comments and
00:01:00.800
corrections were actually the most important part of this uh and rewarding rewarding part of this
00:01:05.640
uh role uh on the western standard and i'm also very thankful to western standard for the opportunity
00:01:10.600
i i had on this platform not saying that that's the end of that i'm saying that hey
00:01:15.000
we're going on a bit of a break here maybe we'll have an entirely different show format when we come
00:01:21.060
back uh i want to be clear that uh one of the things that's interesting to stay tuned for when
00:01:27.340
it does come to what the western standard is doing is it's going to try and make things smoother on
00:01:30.800
this stuff so they're going to get a bit of videography in there they're going to do some
00:01:34.120
editing in there they're going to try and do fade in fade outs it's going to be a lot of fun so
00:01:37.780
do stay tuned for how things are going to change you're trying to kick it up a notch so
00:01:41.300
stay invested stay tuned to what's happening and uh let us know what you think send comments
00:01:47.340
questions concerns our way via email but before i do take this break where i get to go off and
00:01:52.200
get married have a honeymoon and come back to you guys after all that bliss i'd like to make a few
00:01:57.720
last declarations so the first thing i have to say is that i truly believe that when it came to
00:02:03.300
covid the pandemic and the lockdowns we had a fundamental change in this country and it was a
00:02:08.160
really interesting position to be in media when that happened so again i'm thankful for that
00:02:12.460
position i was afforded that vantage point and i'm hopeful that the comments i made during that
00:02:18.640
time were more help than harm more of an aid than a hindrance i do fundamentally believe that
00:02:24.040
the lockdowns as well as the restrictions took more lives than they saved i do fundamentally believe
00:02:30.020
that we know enough now to know how to do this better and if we don't do it better we are now in a
00:02:36.640
state of of of criminal neglect uh and all but willful criminal neglect we can't we can't allow
00:02:44.720
another lockdown say in the fall to be like the lockdowns were the last two times so people need
00:02:50.280
to be given more freedoms need to isolate those who are most vulnerable and let people make their
00:02:54.880
own decisions about everything from vaccinations to masking uh we know enough now people need to be
00:02:59.880
able to move forward uh and it really displayed the fault lines uh inside of this country and i really
00:03:05.220
believe the sovereignty is a manifestation of this to a point it's not that there was no argument of
00:03:09.220
sovereignty before covid but i think that's something that needs to be thought about uh another point that
00:03:14.780
i'd make here is that uh the social contract in this country probably needs to be radically altered
00:03:20.280
which which again ties into sovereignty if it's to be saved this is something that i don't think we
00:03:26.940
hear a whole lot on the right we hear it more on the left and and admittedly it's it's you know this
00:03:31.880
opinion of mine's been greatly influenced by people like stewart like aaron who are helping me kind of
00:03:36.600
see things from from a different perspective but i do fundamentally believe from even a conservative
00:03:41.000
perspective the way we're doing things right now doesn't work uh one of the things i'm always
00:03:46.240
reminded of by uh by a certain member of my church group is that it actually takes capitalism to get to
00:03:51.840
communism uh so for even us on the right uh perhaps free markets perhaps a non-centralized system
00:03:58.980
perhaps people being able to bid what they will bid and and barter and trade all of that conforms to
00:04:04.580
our belief system but the idea that things must be inherently capitalistic and central banks and
00:04:09.220
interest rates and all the rest of it that's not that's not necessarily always the best thing for us
00:04:14.820
on the right and uh it doesn't necessarily always spell the best thing for people and if you want the
00:04:19.080
revolution to come you need capitalism first so not saying that we're going to reject that but i am
00:04:23.940
saying that we we do need to rethink about the the social contract uh what we have right now in this
00:04:30.720
country isn't working that's why there's so much outrage and if we don't fix it we're going to have
00:04:36.140
a fundamental split uh somewhere along the line and that could get violent so that's just that's just to
00:04:41.540
be noted in fact i think it is getting violent go and take a look at all the churches that have been
00:04:45.000
burned to the ground and so lastly on the question of sovereignty itself i still can't give my final
00:04:50.340
ascent to the west leaving the rest of canada uh but i do think such threats might be worthwhile to
00:04:56.440
earn ottawa's ear i just don't know if we left tomorrow if we'd be in a better economic or political
00:05:02.580
position because quite frankly some people who are agitating for such things don't have the west best
00:05:09.080
interest at heart and second of all foreign powers always like it when countries split up because it
00:05:14.140
makes them easier to divide and conquer they're doing half the work for them what i can say of much of
00:05:19.100
canada's problems in every quarter is largely due to having the wrong borders and the wrong kind of
00:05:23.800
constitutional makeup we have a lot of frustrations if we were to redraw our constitutional boundaries
00:05:29.060
and our internal boundaries i truly believe that we'd have a huge improvement in the way things run
00:05:34.380
around here however uh i'm not sure if the oligarchs would agree with that but i think even they would
00:05:39.700
have to agree that our system as it currently stands doesn't run very well right now and we would
00:05:45.120
require some politicians of true grit which ironically is what the liberal party used to say of their
00:05:49.960
members that's who they wanted in their party men of true grit uh to stand up and be counted as well
00:05:55.240
as populations to stop voting for people who bribe them with their own money we can only pray that
00:06:00.880
manifest but will it manifest i'm not sure well we're going to bring on aaron here and we're going to get
00:06:06.320
rolling uh with a few different things when it comes to what's still happening uh in bc with the
00:06:11.400
wildfires and so here we have aaron ekman we are ready to roll good morning good morning or good
00:06:18.640
whatever uh could be good afternoon depending on when you're watching this i suppose absolutely um
00:06:23.820
where where are we starting aaron well i like the the uh we start with the comment from your friend in
00:06:29.840
the church group about meeting uh capitalism before you get to socialism and that's a it's a it's a good
00:06:35.660
insight and leads to one of the major contradictions that was identified even within the
00:06:41.160
communist movement back during the early stages of chinese and and soviet communism and that there
00:06:46.580
was really no developed working class in either of those countries they were largely agrarian mostly
00:06:51.620
peasant class uh and it's the reason why karl marx never predicted that socialism would start in either
00:06:58.660
of those two countries of course he was writing in germany and thought it would would happen there
00:07:02.440
and you know without going too far down this rabbit hole it's part of the reason why i think both of
00:07:08.480
those countries had so much difficulty in trying to create a working class given that they were
00:07:13.280
uh they were espousing an ideology that sort of was predicated on the existence of an advanced
00:07:18.580
working class which has within it the most revolutionary potential because if they stop working
00:07:23.920
everything shuts down which uh so whether they're revolutionary and desire or aspiration or not
00:07:30.840
doesn't take away from the potential of their revolutionary component because uh again you can't run a
00:07:37.020
capitalist economy if workers aren't working and so this is this is merely the the observation of marx
00:07:42.780
and then you had these two countries that tried to embark on that project before uh the revolutionary
00:07:49.560
class or the working class had really been developed um and and all marx really did was sort of talk about
00:07:54.920
the contradictions there anyway you probably didn't think you'd get uh uh a lecture on communism this
00:08:00.980
morning but but the comment uh sort of set me off and we're doing this pre-recorded now so it's easy
00:08:05.920
to edit this stuff out very good very good i'm not doing the editing either so we'll see what the
00:08:13.340
videographer has to say yeah so it was it's been a as we've said a few times it's been a hot week
00:08:19.880
in uh british columbia been a fiery week i guess one could say if if you'll you'll uh forgive me a
00:08:26.520
couple of puns um and weirdly to me uh maybe not maybe i shouldn't i shouldn't be surprised by this
00:08:35.520
stuff i guess but we see there was a lot of talk in british columbia this week about declaring a state
00:08:41.800
of emergency and you know this kind of caught my interest because there was a lot of this debate
00:08:46.880
back in early 2020 if you recall uh there were two states of emergency people don't really realize
00:08:54.080
this nuance but there's there's actually at least two pieces of legislation in british columbia in
00:08:58.700
which we can the government or a health official can declare a state of emergency and so back march
00:09:04.580
2020 the first state of emergency was declared under the public health act by the chief medical officer
00:09:10.260
uh bonnie henry uh and that state uh it's it's a legislative um trigger and it allows it affords
00:09:19.200
all sorts of additional powers to the provincial government as you know and so it enabled the
00:09:23.300
lockdown this was this was repeated across the country as well as uh federally as well but uh
00:09:29.400
provincially in particular it's it's the piece of legislation that allows the provincial government
00:09:33.340
uh via the the health officer to be able to enact all sorts of sweeping author authoritarian uh moves
00:09:41.260
and i i would argue despite the frustrations that people had had in british columbia over this having
00:09:46.660
happened um there was actually a fair bit of reluctance on the part of the provincial government
00:09:51.520
comparative to other jurisdictions to really lock things down hard and really what i witnessed in
00:09:56.940
british columbia and and of course everybody will perceive things differently depending on
00:10:00.580
what their social media feed looks like i what i perceived in british columbia was a large group of
00:10:07.980
the what i like to call the professional managerial class really urging the government to enact more
00:10:13.600
restrictions uh to lock things down harder similar things happen in alberta but you know bizarrely the
00:10:21.140
conservative government the the ucp uh i mean they actually took took the public the pmc up on their
00:10:28.120
on their offer to to lock things down and you saw pastors getting jailed and all sorts of stuff
00:10:33.040
churches were certainly restricted as you talked about a lot here in bc i don't think anybody was
00:10:37.440
arrested um for continuing although i don't know if we had the same kind of pastors who who who sort
00:10:44.120
of violated the the restrictions and so you know it's debatable whether whether the provincial
00:10:49.980
government in british columbia sort of resisted the lockdown as uh as much as they did in alberta or not
00:10:55.860
but in any case what i observed was like if you looked at twitter where the pmc likes to hang out
00:11:01.420
and communicate with each other uh they were taught all the and still today all they do is talk about
00:11:06.420
more restrictions locking things down harder and their frustration about how the provincial government
00:11:10.800
is not enacting mandatory mask legislation etc uh and then the the day after that it was march 17th
00:11:19.440
that bonnie henry did that the day after that march 18th in 2020 uh a second state of emergency
00:11:24.900
sort of a parallel state of emergency under the emergency programs act was enacted by the
00:11:29.960
province of british columbia and so that's that second state of emergency legislation is what was
00:11:36.280
being talked about this week in relation to the wildfires and the biggest uh advocates for declaring
00:11:43.520
a state of emergency ended up being pretty much the entire bc liberal party and i won't show you all
00:11:49.840
the different tweets but uh it was pretty much universal if you were a bc liberal mla shirley
00:11:55.360
bond todd stone dan ash dan ashton i mean is right in the okanagan where some of the evacuations
00:12:00.480
the soyuz etc are taking place so it's understandable that he would be very concerned
00:12:03.760
but you also saw the interesting to me and this is a flashback to our our discussion last week
00:12:10.660
the union of bc indian chiefs and if you'll recall we reported on their statement last week when
00:12:15.520
they came out in favor of in support of harshawalia's comments uh in relation to burn it all down in
00:12:21.760
terms of the churches and you know whether you agree with uh the ubc i see you know sorry the unit
00:12:29.040
the union of bc indian chiefs uh support for harshawalia i was delighted to see somebody at least speak up
00:12:36.480
for somebody's right to free speech and just to preempt uh a number of things people probably also heard
00:12:44.380
that harshawalia has since stepped down from her position uh and i suspect that i read the statement
00:12:51.180
from the board uh and it looks like she was basically pushed out as a result which is something
00:12:57.100
that we probably won't get into today maybe we can talk about it later but very concerning to me that
00:13:01.420
irrespective of what what whether you agree with what she said or not that the head of this bc civil
00:13:05.980
liberties association the organization that is really the only outfit in british columbia that
00:13:11.180
actually advocates for free speech rights there's other organizations in other jurisdictions but in
00:13:16.460
bc it's really the bc civil liberties association the head of that organization being pressured by its
00:13:21.420
own board to step down because of statements that she made i mean that it's in its in and of itself
00:13:27.660
divorced from the context whether you agree with what she said or not is a frightening prospect to me
00:13:32.620
anyway that happened um so this week flash forward this week and the same organization that defended
00:13:39.020
harshawalia the union of bc indian chiefs put another statement out urging the provincial
00:13:44.860
government to declare a state of emergency related to the wildfires which just uh to me was very
00:13:50.940
contradictory uh given how many sweeping powers how many sweeping authority how much sweeping authority
00:13:59.340
these these these legislative triggers give the provincial government and i think if we're a people
00:14:05.260
in in in this province of british columbia who value freedom we should be very hesitant to to provide
00:14:13.660
those kind of sweeping authorities to the provincial government it should be a last resort move uh and
00:14:21.660
this is you know i mean it the irony is not lost on me that the communist is the one saying this
00:14:27.180
and every bc liberal mla to the person pretty much was screaming to the rafters all week
00:14:34.140
about how incompetent the provincial government was for not having declared a state of emergency
00:14:40.940
um so i jump in any time but that that's sort of the framework and i can get into what what the
00:14:46.300
what powers are actually uh triggered in this case yeah i i guess for me it is an interesting
00:14:52.380
contradiction in terms certainly in ideologies and competing ends uh competing goals it the the
00:14:58.540
thing in my mind was on a purely like hey things are going bad right now maybe somebody should turn
00:15:04.060
on a siren like that sort of understanding of the state of american i can sympathize with that even
00:15:21.900
empathize that perhaps even support it to a certain extent but i don't disagree with you that asking for
00:15:27.260
a state of emergency not that there isn't bad things going on right now but the sweeping powers
00:15:32.380
especially after we've just witnessed what happened in covet and now literally there are questions
00:15:37.100
around vaccination what happens if people aren't vaccinated when they go into these uh these school
00:15:41.740
gyms and that sort of thing when they're evacuated and put on cots on rows uh in school gyms that's
00:15:47.340
that's an entirely other sort of situation um and perhaps the first thing that should have been states
00:15:53.580
of the emergency if anything should have been at the municipal level uh before before asking the
00:15:58.620
provincial government to get involved but i can't understand why people would reach that quickly to
00:16:03.100
that to that particular uh apparatus yeah i think i mean i i agree with you there i can i can understand
00:16:11.020
sort of the panic that some people are feeling uh and some organizations are feeling if they can
00:16:15.980
actually see the fires coming towards them you know they're probably like why haven't you declared a
00:16:20.140
state of emergency it's clearly an emergency there's a fire literally coming over the mountain towards my
00:16:25.020
my home i can understand that but let's let's just pop over to the to the presentation i have here
00:16:32.300
um i've got a quote from brendan ralphs who from the emergency management bc embc which is the or the
00:16:39.740
agency the government agency uh which advises the provincial government on whether or not they deem
00:16:46.060
it necessary they think they need the additional authorities afforded through a state of emergency and
00:16:50.540
here's what he says when he was asked last week a state of emergency is primarily a legislative tool
00:16:55.420
and during this current event a provincial declaration of a state of emergency has not
00:16:59.900
been necessary to provide assistance to people to access funding or coordinate or obtain additional
00:17:05.020
resources including federal assets to support both response efforts and people who are affected or
00:17:10.620
impacted by the event so here's this is the guy i mean and this is the thing that that the bc liberal
00:17:15.820
mlas they understand this but when they complain about it to try to try to rile people up as an
00:17:21.500
opposition will try to do this is the part that they leave out and that it's not even really a
00:17:25.820
decision made by politicians it's formalized by politicians it's uh it's declared by cabinet and
00:17:33.100
usually and as as was the case two days ago by the public safety minister um in this case it was mike
00:17:39.980
farmworth but here you got the guy who's responsible for giving the advice to government
00:17:45.900
who has absolutely no reason no incentive to not ask for a state of emergency if he deems it necessary
00:17:54.220
and he's saying look we're fully mobilized we've got all of the resources at this point that we need
00:18:00.060
allocated around the province and as we'll see in a couple of minutes through this press conference that
00:18:05.340
the premier did there's already you know firefighters coming in not just from other provinces but from
00:18:11.020
literally around the world and they're saying they they didn't need to do it and so you have
00:18:17.660
to wonder like why is it that the bc liberals are calling for this so hard and it's just purely
00:18:23.500
performative but if you're a conservative this is the part that i think like the bigger political
00:18:29.260
issue here is this growing divide between the bc liberals and basically you know the sizable
00:18:36.620
conservative contingent of voters in the province the bc liberals have always had a difficult time
00:18:42.380
holding this coalition together and when they make uh performative when they when they make
00:18:48.300
performances like this basically conservatives i think look at this and they think you know how
00:18:53.500
could i ever vote for these guys they're so eager to restrict uh certain freedoms let's go through
00:18:59.020
what it means when you actually invoke and declare a state of emergency into the emergency programs act
00:19:06.220
so first of all the important thing you know not section 991 of the act it's what a lot it's what
00:19:13.980
authorizes cabinet to declare the state of emergency but the important thing is is that it doesn't have
00:19:18.860
to cover the whole province it can be declared just for certain areas so it's entirely possible for
00:19:25.100
for the province to declare a state of emergency in a soyuz it doesn't have to extend it across the
00:19:29.580
province and so we're now in this position where you know i guess they've basically uh folded to to
00:19:35.420
the opposition pressure on this and the opposition is doing a victory lap on it for what reason i don't
00:19:40.700
know um i guess just because they can demonstrate that they're not entirely useless uh although um i mean this
00:19:48.460
like there's really no anyway um they they have extended it across the province so here's what
00:19:55.420
what happens so section the next section uh 10 1d the the we're going to start to get into the kind
00:20:03.100
of things the the special authorities now that a government can uh can carry out as a result of the
00:20:08.700
state of emergency like so it allows the government to acquire or use any land or personal property
00:20:14.060
considered necessary to prevent respond to or alleviate the effects of an emergency or disaster
00:20:19.260
so uh i mean you know this doesn't happen very often but they it's now entirely legal for them
00:20:26.060
to basically just come to your farm and and commandeer all your equipment for instance uh or you know take
00:20:32.540
your truck as you're driving down the street so if you end up going through a roadblock they can just
00:20:35.740
say well oh you got a pickup truck we've got a shortage of pickup trucks in the province which is
00:20:40.300
actually usually a thing i remember back and i think it was when were the big fires that raged
00:20:46.220
through colonna and all through the oklahoma it's going back as far as i think 2005 yeah yeah right
00:20:51.420
i remember i was 16 years ago yeah i i still have this vivid memory i was moving from colonna to
00:20:57.260
vancouver at the time and i didn't have a pickup truck like i do now so i had to go rent one and i
00:21:02.780
couldn't get a pickup truck anywhere in the province because they'd all been common basically
00:21:07.820
commandeered by the by bc wildfire to fight these fires uh fair enough i mean i wasn't complaining it
00:21:14.380
it was more important for them to put the fires out with the with the rental pickup trucks than it was
00:21:18.460
me to move my stuff from colonna to vancouver uh but that's the this is the authority that allows that
00:21:24.380
to happen and they can they can just do it uh to to individuals as well not just a rental companies
00:21:30.780
what else do we have here so authorizer require uh example conscript any person to render a
00:21:37.500
assistance of a type that the person is qualified to provide or that otherwise is or may be required
00:21:42.380
to prevent respond to or alleviate the effects of an emergency or disaster so this there's another
00:21:47.740
piece of legislation as well and i think it's called the wildfire emergency act or something like that
00:21:53.340
where there's sort of a duplicate uh clause in here this is the legislation that historically
00:21:59.660
is the reason why when a wildfire started the pubs would be empty in most small towns because people
00:22:06.700
knew that what used to happen was the fire chief would walk into a pub and just conscript every
00:22:11.820
all the men in the pub to come out and fight the fires that's that's how we used to do it in british
00:22:15.740
columbia uh and so you know when you saw smoke you stayed out of the pubs because you didn't want you
00:22:21.340
know you wanted to go protect your own stuff you didn't want to get constrict conscripted by the by
00:22:26.460
the province to have to go fight the fire somewhere else and they have i met somebody once where this who
00:22:31.740
who this happened to and they were just traveling through they were just like 18 or whatever they'd just
00:22:35.820
gotten out of school like they were they they were in hope or something i guess they decided they
00:22:40.460
wanted to be rambo they were hitchhiking through hope and they and and they got uh there you know
00:22:46.140
some flashing lights turned on the truck pulled the ue this must have been in the 70s or whatever they
00:22:51.180
pulled up next and it was like where are you boys going so well we're all heading up north to go
00:22:55.340
go work in a mine or something we're we're gonna go make money in a mine it's like yeah yeah you were
00:22:59.500
headed up there get in the truck and they were and they were conscripted they were paid they were
00:23:04.700
paid they were given their check at the end but they but they were put through you know fire
00:23:09.260
training which was hold the hose and don't die and then uh told to fight the fire that was how it was
00:23:14.540
well that's the thing is that it says you have to be qualified but holding a hose you know they can
00:23:19.260
deem you qualified after you've received 30 seconds worth of instruction right hold the hose like this
00:23:23.820
down like this and point it this way point it at the flame so yeah no this this is uh and i i don't even
00:23:31.020
necessarily disagree with this stuff but like are we in this spot where we have to start conscripting
00:23:35.740
people like you know as we go through this you start to realize that the people that were they
00:23:39.900
were screaming to the rafters for a state of emergency to be declared they don't even know what
00:23:45.820
it means they just sort of want attention like they have no idea what it what it they just say oh it
00:23:50.940
means you can get more resources from where what other resources that we don't ever already have like
00:23:56.620
why do we need a state of emergency to invite uh firefighters from alberta mexico all over the
00:24:02.700
the world actually to come in and help us out we don't we've already done that you don't require
00:24:07.740
a state of emergency to do it and like i said if we go back to the original slide you know brendan
00:24:12.700
we're also saying we've we've been fighting these fires early uh all summer and we have you know we
00:24:18.940
don't need to restrict your freedoms at this point to do it we'll let you know if that changes
00:24:23.020
you know so what else authorize the entry into any building or any land without warrant by this
00:24:29.260
is this stuff gets scary by any person in the course of implementing an emergency plan or program
00:24:34.700
or if otherwise considered by the minister to be necessary to prevent respond to or alleviate the
00:24:39.100
effects of an emergency or disaster so i actually don't have any concerns that the current bc ndp
00:24:46.460
government is going to abuse this stuff and part of the reason why i'm not concerned about that
00:24:51.980
is because they seem so reluctant to to invoke a state of emergency even when the opposition
00:24:58.460
the the so-called free market coalition the center-right coalition is lighting pardon the pun
00:25:05.580
lighting their hair on fire because the province hasn't yet restricted our freedoms uh and invoked
00:25:10.140
this state of emergency but you know they cannot like if you had somebody in government that had a
00:25:16.140
bit of an authoritarian bent like the kind of the kind of politicians that cry for this stuff even
00:25:21.900
though they don't really know what it means you can see all sorts of entry points for abuse and and
00:25:28.300
it's important for people to actually take a look at the legislation to see what the stuff means before
00:25:33.180
they start calling for this which is why it's so confusing to me that the union of bc indian chiefs
00:25:38.700
of all organizations who has a long history of justifiably being concerned about authoritarian
00:25:44.700
overreach by the provincial government given the history of treaty negotiations and betrayals would be that
00:25:50.380
would be joining the bc liberals at the top of the fray calling for this state of emergency it just
00:25:55.020
baffles the mind it does baffle the mind i i mean as as somebody who has lived on a farm for a decent
00:26:02.380
chunk of his life i i also am not super interested in the government having a warrantless way of getting
00:26:09.500
onto my property to come and see what i've been up to for the last couple of years i i already have a
00:26:14.380
problem with bc assessment coming on there and trying to up my taxes for no good reason i have a problem
00:26:19.740
with the alr and bc assessment not understanding that a piece of land that has no buildings on it
00:26:24.380
no hydro no access to public roads is not lakeside residential it's a farmer's field and having to
00:26:30.700
fight them on that and then finally i have no time for you know again even my regional district who
00:26:35.420
decides that my secondary dwelling just because it happens to not be an ugly trailer somehow doesn't
00:26:40.060
qualify as a permitted structure when they kind of told me it did and then it didn't that i don't know
00:26:44.220
what's happening and they got bill c52 like i mean farmers got enough problems as it is
00:26:49.340
and well the funny thing gonna help no not at all i mean i what would be a beautiful scenario from my
00:26:55.980
perspective on in your individual case is if they did come onto your land as a result of uh this and
00:27:02.860
decided that this building that the regional district or whoever won't permit uh actually ends up
00:27:08.140
being a perfect structure to help them fight the fire house because it actually is so wouldn't that
00:27:15.100
be funny and i wonder you know if you could then use that example to argue that it should be permitted
00:27:20.220
uh probably not uh because most of these agencies don't talk to each other or or or do anything that
00:27:25.820
makes any sense but again this is you know this is the kind of over overreaching powers that they
00:27:31.100
award themselves um let's see what else we have here because it gets worse like it actually gets worse
00:27:37.660
so the you know the next section says it enables government to procure fixed prices for or ration
00:27:43.420
food clothing fuel equipment medical supplies or other essential supplies and the use of any property
00:27:50.140
services resources or equipment within any part of british columbia for the duration of the state of
00:27:54.620
emergency so why hasn't somebody done this and fixed our gas prices yet like i mean really you know
00:28:01.420
a back gas is gas is you know a buck a liter and uh smokes are five bucks a pack and uh you know i
00:28:09.740
mean burgers we're going back to the dollar menu at mcdonald's like i don't this is great i
00:28:15.260
buck a liter it's buck 45 a liter and down in vancouver it's like almost two bucks like a buck and three
00:28:20.540
quarters yeah no this has got to be this has got to be stopped yeah so if now you got a state of
00:28:27.980
emergency do something with it i guess we could say yeah price price fixes let's do it um so i i mean
00:28:34.540
you can even if you're not concerned about like you can look at this and go you know whoa this is
00:28:40.300
concerning but it also gives you a sense of why we have this legislation and the kind of situations in
00:28:45.980
which it's useful so if you're like what kind of scenario do you have to be in where government
00:28:51.020
has to fix prices and ration food and clothing and fuel for the populace yeah yeah it's exactly
00:29:00.380
what it is it's wartime right and so like why is the so-called right-wing government the the government
00:29:08.060
that's supposed to be for or sorry not government but uh opposition party the right the the so-called
00:29:13.500
center-right right-wing party in british columbia that is supposed to be the home for conservatives
00:29:19.100
calling for this the these kind of uh restrictions lockdowns and powers for for government in this
00:29:25.980
scenario when you know when brendan ralphs from emerging emergency management bc is saying we're good
00:29:32.380
like we don't we don't need this additional authority that's what's that's what i think all
00:29:37.260
conservatives should be asking themselves um and it goes on it's also similar to the
00:29:43.180
public health act that can be used to control or prohibit travel to or from any area of british
00:29:48.300
columbia um and that's the end so uh so we can probably take that down so this is um uh this is
00:29:57.980
what the bc liberals have been calling for for the better part of a week and are now doing a victory
00:30:01.660
lap because the public safety minister uh the day before yesterday finally got on the air and said okay
00:30:07.020
well you asked for it so now we're under a state of emergency what they should do is press all of them
00:30:12.300
who were calling for it into service to fight the forest fires that would be so poetic you know so
00:30:17.660
they have this paddy wagon going around and it's playing fortunate son really really loud and they
00:30:22.940
and they're just they have press gang so just pressing people into the paddy wagon who all have their
00:30:27.900
lapels from uh from being in legislature it'd be brilliant i would love here in prince george to see
00:30:33.340
it roll up to shirley bond's office and uh okay surely get in get in loser we're gonna go fight
00:30:40.540
some fires exactly i don't think i'm qualified don't worry about it we'll got you covered we'll
00:30:44.940
give you five seconds at home's training there you go there you go just look very surly look very
00:30:51.340
surly and you'll do fine wait a minute wait a minute so then so there was this there was this weird
00:30:57.740
sort of press conference yesterday somewhere in the east kootenays which is the
00:31:00.860
you know they got a number of fires down in the east kootenays uh which they always do it's a hot
00:31:05.820
climate in the winter they're sorry in the summer and um and but they did this bizarre press conference
00:31:12.780
where basically like you know the forest minister who's already been under pardon the pun a lot of fire
00:31:18.380
uh prior to the wildfires because uh basically she hasn't done despite whatever criticisms the bc ndp
00:31:26.620
launched against the previous bc bc liberal government over mismanagement of our of our forests
00:31:33.500
nothing substantially different has come from the bc ndp government now into their second term
00:31:39.980
uh you know they've been here now since 2017 and none of the tenure uh programs have changed in the
00:31:47.900
province uh as our good friend uh uh friend of the show james steidel uh will tell us you know they're
00:31:55.580
still uh allowing the spray of mono crops and the destruction of all the biodiversity in the forest
00:32:01.660
which is one of the major contributors to these kind of wildfires which is and i didn't grab the clip
00:32:06.380
but if you you know if you watch any youtube now from british columbia you get this targeted ad at you
00:32:11.420
from the bc government basically chastising you for having cigarettes uh basically making the case
00:32:17.980
that while the reason we have so many fires in british columbia is because everybody's smoking
00:32:22.220
and nobody's being careful now you know they are i mean it probably i mean i think they actually had
00:32:29.500
quantified a couple of weeks ago that upwards of 50 of the fires in the province were human started
00:32:36.140
right like they had but it doesn't mean they were all started by cigarettes like i don't think there's
00:32:40.540
really that many people even smoking anymore i don't i don't know i mean about 15 of the population
00:32:46.300
at most yeah so so you know if we're to believe the bc government and and their ad campaign now
00:32:54.300
that percentage of the province that low percentage of the province is out in the woods like throwing
00:32:58.300
their their butts in into the driving around just tossing cigarette butts and being hardcore campers
00:33:04.060
that's all they do they just yeah all the time yeah because people that like to go camping i mean
00:33:08.220
they're big smokers they just like to sit around like it's not like they go hiking and kayaking and
00:33:13.020
need their lung capacity or anything they just tend to be you know they just go and they basically
00:33:17.100
you know smoke a pack and they're just chucking them out into the woods uh that's what they do
00:33:21.020
that's that's that's what i used to do when i smoked not that long ago that's what i did
00:33:25.100
that's how i that's how i smoked yeah it's the middle of july seems like a good idea like i just
00:33:31.580
think british columbians are a bit smarter than that but the bc government they have an incentive to
00:33:36.940
lead us to believe that we're the ones starting all these fires because what they don't want you
00:33:41.020
to do and this isn't just the bc ndp this is all this stuff happened during the bc liberal government
00:33:45.580
as well what they don't want you to do is pay any attention to how they manage our forests they don't
00:33:50.460
want you to pay any attention to the fact that we've just got these basically pine monocrops with
00:33:55.500
no aspen no no biodiversity at all we actually spray them to kill the other uh the other life in the
00:34:01.740
forest because we treat them like farms like tree farms like christmas tree farms and that's what
00:34:07.580
makes them so flammable and then they also say oh well we got to send people out to clear the brush
00:34:12.460
off the forest floor because that's flammable well yeah sure it's flammable but it's a lot less
00:34:20.460
like you need that brush because it has to biodegrade onto the forest floor to create the diversity and
00:34:25.180
the nutrients to regenerate the forest and we're wondering why we can't grow the kind of wood that we used
00:34:30.460
to we're wondering why all of the mills are shutting down citing shortages of fiber we wonder why you
00:34:36.460
know when fires do get started they just rip through these forests like never before and it gives
00:34:44.300
yeah my cat's going to jump in on this as well i hope that's okay that's fine uh and it gives a lot
00:34:50.140
of meat well i shouldn't say meat because they're mostly vegans but it gives a lot of uh substance to
00:34:55.660
the arguments from the environmentalists that well this is all the result of climate change and
00:35:00.300
and that's you know that's the message that we're hearing from all quarters now that
00:35:05.820
they almost seem gleeful that you know here's the evidence that we've been warning you about for so
00:35:10.220
long and blah blah blah well yeah i mean we had a hot year we had a heat dome um and you can say that's
00:35:18.780
a result of climate change etc that's fine i'm not disputing that i'm not disputing that there's some
00:35:22.940
changes in the in the climate uh i'm not going to you know make the cases because of human activity
00:35:29.420
it could be because of human activity but there's a lot more human activity going towards starting
00:35:34.380
these fires in our forest practices which can be reversed quite easily and you don't have to like
00:35:41.020
cut emissions to do it um you can just be smarter with the with you can stop killing all of the
00:35:48.380
biodiversity and stop creating these monocrops of pine uh and weak spindly trees like it's it's almost
00:35:55.660
like the whole we used to make fun of the island for having such toothpick you know we used to call
00:35:59.900
them well i won't say what we used to call them but tiny little poles right uh compared to the rest
00:36:04.060
of the province where the where the wood was more substantial it's like the whole province is island
00:36:07.980
wood now uh and this and and when the fire comes it just rips right through it so anyway there
00:36:13.740
was this we could probably jump over the video and i'll scrub through it a bit um but we'll do
00:36:19.420
right across the the kootenays and the interior yeah just to open this up so this is that press
00:36:25.180
conference i was telling you about i just got a few clips from this and we'll parse it and sort of
00:36:28.780
dissect it um but this is basically this was uh yesterday and this was basically right after the
00:36:36.220
public safety minister mike farnworth had declared a state of emergency finally uh and you know i mean the bc
00:36:43.100
liberals are going to say well you know it's because of all of our pressure it probably isn't
00:36:47.180
it's probably just that you know the emergency management bc finally decided okay sure uh yeah
00:36:53.580
we can use the additional uh powers now and so then the joke becomes well if it was so if it if we didn't
00:36:59.260
need it last week why do we now need it this week it's it's it's obviously because of all the pressure
00:37:02.860
relaunched well maybe there's more fires this week than last week like maybe it's a more dangerous
00:37:07.340
situation uh and maybe the the experts that monitor this stuff and advise politicians like
00:37:12.940
our premier finally decided okay well we need it or maybe they did just buckle to the to the pressure
00:37:18.540
because like who in their right mind if they're being offered all of this additional authoritarian
00:37:23.180
power is going to turn it down i mean people are going to take it and this is sort of what happened
00:37:27.660
so this first uh clip is just it gives you a sense of how many different uh firefighters are being
00:37:34.060
brought in and from and from how far here and here in the south uh our our thoughts are with you
00:37:39.180
our resources are behind you minister farnworth yesterday uh declared a provincial state of
00:37:44.300
emergency we have all of the resources we need on the ground of course if we had more
00:37:50.460
we would take them that being firefighters from other jurisdictions we have quebec firefighters on the
00:37:55.420
ground now new brunswick on the way 100 mexican firefighters who we depend on annually are on their
00:38:03.180
way they'll be here in a number of days and we are also working with our other international partners the
00:38:08.300
united states uh australia uh to make sure as this season continues that we have the resources that
00:38:14.300
we need so so like there's i didn't even realize this but we're bringing people in from even mexico
00:38:20.940
um which is interesting because you know there's all this talk about shutting the borders down and
00:38:25.980
and there's some additional questions about uh the federal decision to close the extend the border
00:38:30.940
closure with the us and to require double vaccines but throughout this entire time there's really been no
00:38:37.020
restrictions on bringing in uh firefighters from from other countries but also there's been a constant
00:38:44.300
flow of temporary foreign workers coming into the into the province uh irrespective of the wildfires so
00:38:50.620
you know most of these people are you know being brought in to pick fruit etc um so it's just
00:38:55.820
interesting that like we'll go through all these efforts to restrict the freedom of british colombians
00:39:00.380
to travel to and from uh the u.s and other jurisdictions in in canada uh but don't ever
00:39:07.020
put any restrictions on the flow of cheap foreign labor coming into the into the province that has
00:39:12.540
never been restricted uh going right back to last year um and we'll get into this a bit more
00:39:20.380
i think that one of the things we need to realize when it comes to temporary foreign workers and that sort
00:39:25.340
of thing is that they really are they really are everywhere they're more more present than people
00:39:29.820
think uh and and i think that something that's a real failing on the right is kind of the willful
00:39:35.500
blindness that we put ourselves through about it uh we don't we talk often about somehow uh immigrants
00:39:41.340
coming and and i mean in the united states immigrants coming and taking your jobs are are much more uh
00:39:47.260
common rhetoric in canada it's a little bit softer around well i mean can't we grow the domestic
00:39:52.060
population in such a way as to as to you know meet the economic needs of canada and i am sympathetic
00:39:57.100
to that argument insofar that i think if you have more pro-family policies and you make it easier
00:40:01.900
to have larger families and you make it more advantageous to get married stay married and all the
00:40:06.220
tax breaks that come thereof i i think that's a great way to grow your domestic population and i do
00:40:11.580
believe that a domestic population having already been you know inculcated with the culture and having
00:40:16.620
uh access to the language etc that's that is your best resource for growing your own country but that
00:40:24.140
being said i think when it comes to temporary foreign workers question canadians don't realize
00:40:29.100
that it's it's both a push and a shove it's it's it's a double whammy they take you coming and going
00:40:34.460
those jobs should be well paid enough that canadians would be able to do them and support
00:40:39.660
other families or do them as a summer job and at the same time for the workers who are coming in
00:40:44.780
there their condition should be the concern of canadians and they we shouldn't just abuse
00:40:48.620
ourselves and think to ourselves well obviously the americans abuse their foreign workers but we're
00:40:53.100
or or they're and they're illegal uh uh immigrants as well as as non non well non-regularized workers
00:41:00.140
but the can but the canadians don't do that and i think that's something that's very clearly not true
00:41:04.700
in canada was something that needs to change yeah and what you're going to see in in some of these
00:41:09.900
clips is sort of the hypocrisy of the media who had previously joined the bc liberals
00:41:14.540
in lighting their hair on fire over the what they perceive to be a delay in calling the state of
00:41:20.460
emergency and then once it's been called they start asking all these questions that are worried
00:41:26.140
you know expressing concern over the economic impacts of the state of emergency which there
00:41:31.100
are some or there can be right because you're it's additional lockdowns and and placing restrictions
00:41:36.540
on businesses etc so we'll see some of that hypocrisy in a sec but this first clip i think is just
00:41:41.500
talking about some of the evacuations and some of the powers that are being that we're seeing on the
00:41:46.620
horizon we all have to hang together as british colombians and and follow the lead of of emergency
00:41:53.260
personnel uh take guidance take direction if there's an evacuation order uh it doesn't is not made lightly
00:41:59.900
and for those who believe that they should stay on their property and and uh fight the good fight a
00:42:05.980
better course of action is to take direction from those who are watching the fires not from their
00:42:10.940
fence line but from above and using technologies and and personnel to protect people so that there's
00:42:18.380
a i mean that's interesting to me the reason i wanted to show that was because he starts out
00:42:25.260
in a way that i can kind of support in the sense that he's saying look we don't declare a state of
00:42:31.100
emergency unless we absolutely have to that's basically what he's trying to say there and from
00:42:34.780
my perspective i mean they've already declared it probably too early but i mean i think i'd like to
00:42:39.900
think that we could actually get through a fire season without declaring a state of emergency
00:42:43.580
um it just seems to be this annual thing we do now and the pro the danger in that is the public
00:42:48.060
becomes so accustomed to it that we we start to see what we're seeing now and that the public is
00:42:52.460
not the public but the professional managerial class is is calling for it and part of the you know
00:42:58.700
we've been talking about this tendency throughout the duration of the show knowing that the professional
00:43:04.780
managerial class really really likes lockdowns because they can exert a lot of authority uh through
00:43:11.580
through that kind of a legislative framework uh even more so than you know what i would refer to
00:43:16.940
as sort of the oligarchy or the or the traditional ruling class and so you start to see this
00:43:21.500
fight emerge between the professional managerial class and the oligarchs at the top
00:43:25.420
uh with workers just sort of suffering uh as we usually do um but he starts out by saying you
00:43:32.380
know like we're kind of reluctant to do this and and we're only going to do it if we absolutely need
00:43:36.300
to but then he makes this statement that has always kind of bothered me it's not just from him it's it's
00:43:41.260
kind of the philosophy of our approach to fire in british columbia and probably canada which i
00:43:45.740
understand is a little bit different in places like australia which also have uh significant challenges
00:43:50.940
with fires every year and that we have this total sort of paternalistic attitude to to especially
00:43:57.660
rural landowners uh it's particularly in the agricultural sector who i believe have always been
00:44:04.060
well suited and well equipped to help defend their land against fire why because a they understand the
00:44:13.020
land better than anybody because they work it uh b they have a hell of a lot of irrigation equipment
00:44:18.540
which means they can move a lot more water around um and they can kind of soak the fields etc and see
00:44:26.140
depending on what they're growing it's probably if there's large fields surrounding their uh their
00:44:31.660
home or any structures that could burn they're probably not that flammable because they're full of water
00:44:37.340
green and not you know large and dead like a lot of our forests are now uh and yet we have and in
00:44:44.380
australia i understand i'm not an expert here but i understand that there's more freedom afforded like
00:44:49.420
there's it's it's more difficult for the state to come in and forcibly remove somebody particularly
00:44:54.540
in rural areas from their property and there's this belief that you know farmers generally are pretty
00:45:00.620
good at fighting fires uh and or at least preventing the the destruction of their crop and livestock and
00:45:07.260
that's the other thing there's a lot of animal lives that are just sort of left during evacuations they're
00:45:12.220
not fed or you know i mean it's a real it can be very difficult uh disastrous for farmers whereas in bc
00:45:19.340
uh not only does the do the authorities have the power to physically remove people and sort of arrest
00:45:25.340
them and remove them from their property but it's just culturally uh approved it's it's like
00:45:32.940
we shame people who want to exercise their freedom to defend their own land and use their own equipment to
00:45:38.300
try to fight fires which to me has always been counterproductive in a re something that i've
00:45:42.780
never liked about our own culture here in british columbia i think i think in british columbia too
00:45:48.060
there's a definite bond between the farmers that that goes deeper than just orders coming in from
00:45:53.900
overhead from the government and the bond between farmers is that you know you help you don't you don't
00:46:00.540
have to be you don't have to be perfect you know perfect friends with everybody but you have to be
00:46:05.740
neighborly right and and so if you're if your neighbor needs help you go and help because the
00:46:11.100
next time it's going to be you that needs help and that that bond runs very deeply inside of the
00:46:15.900
farming world and farming culture even today even between different kinds of farming as much as some
00:46:20.700
might grumble at well i'm not in a protected industry like the dairy guy is i still believe that
00:46:25.660
i need to help if his place is threatened just like he's going to help me if my place is threatened
00:46:29.900
and finally one of the things that actually comes up very spawn spontaneously inside of the
00:46:34.300
farming world is that when there was that big evacuation two or three years ago now in the
00:46:39.260
central interior around williams lake and that sort of thing people were taking their animal
00:46:44.300
trailers from up north ripping down there and loading up the animals of people's farms and
00:46:49.580
bringing them back to their own farms and feeding them on their behalf there was an evacuation of
00:46:54.140
animals as well and to your point like people's like they're still cattle wrestling let's put it
00:47:00.540
that way like there are actually still cattle rustlers and hog rustlers that this still happens
00:47:04.540
people still steal animals why because they have value so to that same end you could imagine that
00:47:10.220
one like there were people definitely tried to get away with stealing some stuff not when they were
00:47:13.500
evacuating people but other people took advantage of farmers having to leave their animals behind
00:47:18.140
but another thing we have to realize is imagine a fire did rip through your cattle herd and and killed
00:47:23.260
half your cattle that's that could be millions of dollars millions of dollars right this is this is
00:47:27.980
walking money right that's what it is that's why i have to take really good care of it because it's
00:47:31.100
money that walks right you you gotta you gotta know where it is you gotta have dogs to take
00:47:34.860
care of you ride your quad around you got a gun to make sure the bears don't get at it like this
00:47:39.100
is very important stuff and and bc isn't the cattle country of alberta sure but it still has plenty
00:47:44.620
of diversified farming that happens here that's worth a lot of money and if we just let fires take it
00:47:50.620
all like that's that's people's livelihoods gone forever yeah and and the the culturally the way we
00:47:57.580
approach it is we prioritize your immediate safety over your future safety and so because
00:48:03.500
there's this threat that your your family can be killed in a fire you can be killed in a fire
00:48:08.860
you know the state has now the authority to physically remove you from your home which is just
00:48:13.900
backwards i mean it totally removes uh the uh expertise that that farmers have or anybody in
00:48:23.820
rural areas to operate their equipment that they have to protect their own things but like why
00:48:28.700
wouldn't i mean if we have this is what's so contradictory we have this legislation that allows
00:48:32.860
us to run around and pick up trucks and go into a pub and empty the pub out and drag everybody into the
00:48:37.820
forest to go fight fires and yet we so we trust british columbians enough that we can exercise that
00:48:42.780
authority but we don't trust landowners in rural areas enough to defend their own bloody land so like
00:48:48.300
i mean if you just sort of play this out to its logical conclusion you get these ridiculous possible
00:48:53.100
scenarios where you remove the person from their own land who actually knows how to operate the
00:48:57.660
irrigation equipment knows what to do with their animals to keep them safe has a pretty good idea of
00:49:02.860
the lay of the land beyond their own borders because um because they live there and they work the area
00:49:08.860
but um uh we're going to remove them from their land and then we're going to go to the pub and get
00:49:13.260
a bunch of people and come in and have them fight the fire on the farmer's land like it's just stupid
00:49:17.580
and and we do so because we hide behind this uh requirement of the state this responsibility we
00:49:25.260
say of the state to stop you from getting killed but freedom means the freedom to put yourself in harm's
00:49:32.460
way that's what it's always meant uh and that's you know i mean the same concept extends to feminists
00:49:40.460
who i actually tend to really like like camille palia who say things like the whole point of feminism
00:49:47.420
for us was to fight against imposed curfews at universities etc uh knowing that if we were to step
00:49:53.980
outside at night by ourselves and we're wearing skimpy clothes for instance uh we may increase our chances of
00:50:00.860
getting attacked by male predators but we demand the freedom to put ourselves in that kind of danger
00:50:07.340
that's that's what we demand uh yes we might get raped as a result of uh where we go or what we do
00:50:14.060
but the freedom to go do that is more important to us than uh than not having that freedom because
00:50:21.740
the state or the administration or whoever the authority the direct authority is thinks they're going
00:50:26.700
to take our safety in their hands and make decisions for us so that's always that's a piece of legislation
00:50:32.220
i think that has to be revisited and yes it does mean that you might get more cases where you know
00:50:37.260
farmers who are staying on their land and not following the evacuation order perish in a fire but
00:50:43.180
they have to you know like they if you want to live in a free and democratic society you have to give
00:50:49.100
those people the freedom to make that decision i think that's that's my argument on it anyway
00:50:53.020
well i i agree with you but but we're getting into a funny moment not unlike the one we had with a
00:50:58.860
with a certain with a certain tall left-wing guy uh some some weeks ago now i guess it would almost
00:51:04.700
be months ago now where uh he was on the show with me and he said that when you increase the supply of
00:51:09.580
something that doesn't decrease its demand and we know this from basic economics and that's why we
00:51:13.740
should prevent the the further exploitation of fossil fuels and i turned to him and said well we social
00:51:18.540
conservatives been saying that about pornography for years and nobody's backing us up and he's like
00:51:22.860
well i know i'm making a very socially conservative argument but that's the point and i'm like well
00:51:26.860
kind of the same point here you're making a very freedom-based argument aaron but that's the point
00:51:31.500
of those of us who are pretty skeptical about the pandemic skeptical about the lockdowns and of the
00:51:36.460
vaccine especially now that now that there's enough people dosed and they've kind of tricked everybody
00:51:40.780
into getting it they're like oh yeah by the way it we might still have a third fourth eighth wave i
00:51:45.180
don't know what way we're on anymore they're like oh yeah no like i mean we promised you that this would fix
00:51:49.340
everything but it isn't going to but also still take it but also still wear masks and also there
00:51:53.500
might be another lockdown in september enjoy your summer it's like you know i think at this point
00:51:59.180
we know enough to know that it's it like don't don't hug your grandma don't lick the doorknob and
00:52:04.540
don't be a jerk and maybe move on with life i don't know we'll keep the old folks safe and we'll move on
00:52:09.660
with life but but for some reason it's always that baiting it's always that baiting so to your point i
00:52:15.020
completely agree with you i want people to have freedom and exercise their freedom but the people
00:52:19.260
who are running this thing don't seem to want that very much well and what's so surprising to me is
00:52:25.020
that like the bc ndp government is the one that's more reluctant to go down this road than the so-called
00:52:29.820
free market uh coalition of the bc liberals so who's like i mean i i think if there was actually a
00:52:37.500
a legitimate sort of conservative party in opposition or in the legislature in british columbia
00:52:43.820
i you know i'd like to think that you you'd have some voice in the legislature that would be
00:52:48.220
saying whoa hang on maybe we should uh examine whether or not we actually need to gift ourselves
00:52:54.700
this kind of authority this this draconian authoritarian power just because the the province
00:53:01.020
is burning we've been here before uh but but the bc liberals who are supposed to be representing
00:53:06.140
conservatives in this province they're shouting louder than the bc ndp is for these kind of
00:53:11.020
lockdowns and restrictions they certainly did the same thing uh during the pandemic there was no
00:53:17.100
uh criticism from from the opposition of the the lockdowns and restrictions that existed uh that
00:53:23.740
were enacted by the bc ndp government and by the public health officer so which party is it in british
00:53:28.940
columbia that raises the banner of freedom uh it like there doesn't seem to be one at least not one
00:53:35.980
that uh is reflected in the legislature at all and this is the kind of thing i think the conservatives
00:53:41.020
that are concerned about this stuff especially coming out of the pandemic especially if they were
00:53:45.580
small business owners etc that their business was essentially uh demolished or or greatly hampered
00:53:51.820
because of the restrictions they're they got to watch this stuff and go like nobody's nobody's
00:53:56.380
speaking for us certainly the bc liberals are not speaking for us i'd be curious to know aaron
00:54:00.860
gunn's position on some of this stuff actually because he is the closest thing that i can see
00:54:05.660
in that in that crop of candidates to someone who's got sort of these traditional kind of uh freedom
00:54:12.780
uh based uh uh conservative politics but he hasn't said anything either that i can see
00:54:19.020
i think i think that's something to kind of jump off here especially especially as we're on our our last
00:54:23.660
show here before hiatus i i think this is actually a crux of an argument when it comes to canada in
00:54:29.660
general and and definitely bc specifically and even our local municipality of prince roger and other
00:54:35.020
places that that question of freedom freedom and freedom versus not just versus responsibility but
00:54:39.740
at what of what level does the government have a right to kind of influence that and my my response
00:54:44.620
ideologically or at least methodologically would be the reason why freedom doesn't sell anymore
00:54:50.780
there's a lot of people agitating for it there's probably about anywhere from 25 to 30 to 40 percent of
00:54:54.940
the population somewhere that that would vote for the freedom candidate or the freedom party
00:55:01.180
the reason that that doesn't buy that doesn't get the votes it needs to is that it's that it also it's
00:55:06.300
not just about the responsibility it comes with but freedom isn't an ideology freedom is a poise
00:55:12.460
right it's a it's a it's a pretense it's a frame it's a paradigm it's not it's not an ideology so you
00:55:17.900
tell people no i i really believe that you should be able to make your own choices and take responsibility
00:55:21.980
for them they're like well what's your program it's like well no i'm i'm saying that you are going
00:55:26.380
to figure out your own program it's like but what are you going to do for us what are you going
00:55:29.500
to give us how are you going to save us where's my monorail no it's just but this is it where's my
00:55:34.380
sky train damn it like but this is exactly it and i'm not saying the government shouldn't have
00:55:39.900
some kind of programming around how to keep society ordered right we're canadian conservatives
00:55:44.940
we're not libertarians those of us who are on the right in canada those who are libertarians in canada
00:55:49.100
i don't really know what you're doing here the only thing that you kind of get away with in canada
00:55:53.180
is that it's so big if you go to its reaches its furthest reaches there's no enforcement because
00:55:58.060
there's no cops and there's no tax police because they just can't get there because they don't care
00:56:02.540
but the point being that that canadian conservatism has always had a bit of a marriage with the idea
00:56:08.220
of big programming starting right from this from the canadian pacific railway but but nonetheless like
00:56:13.580
freedom and freedom like yes i believe in the freedom idea and a freedom party a freedom
00:56:18.540
candidate but it does not sell in the sense that you can't you can't program it so you're always
00:56:25.420
disorganized you're disorganized you know freedom people disorganized not anarchists but we'll say
00:56:32.300
that it's a disorganized non-violent anarchists versus organized status well you always lose to
00:56:38.940
the status and you know that as well as i do and freedom really should be something that i i like your
00:56:45.340
characterization of is something that's non-partisan it's it should be advocated by people on the left
00:56:50.140
and the right uh because the left and the right exists in a in a both has authoritarian tendencies
00:56:56.940
as well so you have to have that bulwark against authoritarianism on both sides of the political
00:57:01.900
spectrum and you know i've been concerned because you know i understand enough about the history of the
00:57:07.980
left to know that um for instance uh you know one of the the main reason for the everett massacre
00:57:14.860
just south of the border was was because uh the state moved against the the assertion by the left
00:57:21.500
and in particular the trade union movement to their right of freedom of speech to be able to to go
00:57:25.740
down to free speech corner right downtown and get on a soapbox and and talk about things i haven't
00:57:32.060
seen any example from the left that demonstrates that they they put this since then that they put
00:57:38.220
the same emphasis on protecting freedom unfortunately we've had to sort of look to the right for for that
00:57:43.420
emphasis uh until recently and in british columbia there that's my concern is not even the right
00:57:49.180
anymore is is making these arguments and in fact quite the opposite it's the right uh in the legislature
00:57:56.780
that is calling for additional restrictions uh and and there's no criticism whatsoever and media in bc
00:58:03.020
has been completely complicit in this as well that's what's also so frustrating they're so fickle
00:58:07.980
and they just sort of like i mean it's so contradictory you listen to some of their questions
00:58:11.980
and you just laugh at them because you know what they were asking yesterday and they just contradict
00:58:16.300
themselves for anybody that pays attention for more than a goldfish's memory um and so here's
00:58:22.460
here's them after a couple of weeks of them joining the course of the bc liberal opposition in decrying
00:58:29.740
the the provincial government for not having declared a state of emergency here they are asking
00:58:33.660
all sorts of questions about the kind of economic impact this new state of emergency is going to have
00:58:38.300
on the province certainly uh the forest sector is going to be slowed down by the fires no question about
00:58:45.260
that you will know that lumber prices have been at historic highs and and that's not a couple of
00:58:52.220
percent above normal it's massively above normal so can for and and other forest companies have done
00:58:59.260
very well in the past number of months and a break now to give relief on the land base uh to provide
00:59:06.540
the resources that we need potentially uh equipment from those companies to put to the fire
00:59:12.220
is what happens uh almost annually when we have difficult seasons so i'm not surprised that can for
00:59:17.900
us uh decided to shut down will that have an impact in the short term of course it will but again these
00:59:23.660
are quarterly businesses that table their profits and you would have seen record high profits by major bc
00:59:30.220
forest companies in the first quarter i suspect we'll see that in the second quarter we need to make
00:59:34.620
sure that those benefits to those companies flow down to workers to communities and of course also
00:59:40.460
uh to the province so that we can provide the services that we need critically right now to put
00:59:45.820
out fires so these are cyclical events and there goes a helicopter
00:59:53.020
this is the other thing that's kind of funny about horgan he's so easily distracted
00:59:57.420
like he's just if you watch this whole thing in its entirety there's he's uh he's sort of distracted
01:00:02.140
from his message a few times as helicopters fly over and people walk around him it's it's kind of funny
01:00:07.260
you know he's like he's like a more friendly you know uh doug ford you know it's just he's
01:00:13.100
it's just a slightly less aggressive doug ford he's just a good old boy just wandering around
01:00:17.420
happens to be premier it's like oh hi how you doing i'm in charge now i guess all right i don't know
01:00:23.020
if he's less aggressive than uh than doug ford i mean he can get pretty aggressive too he's he's put a
01:00:27.340
lot of work i think and his communications team has put a lot of work into trying to tone him down but
01:00:32.140
he you know he can get pretty he can get pretty fiery but uh but the similarities i think are spot
01:00:37.180
on um but yeah i mean this is an interesting development so i mean can forest shut down but
01:00:42.060
they um uh the interesting bit is like government can go in and sort of commandeer a bunch of their
01:00:48.060
equipment as well and apply it to the fire which i mean that's actually that's good that's the way it
01:00:54.060
should be um whether we've got to that point yet that they need to do it or not that's that's another
01:00:59.420
question um and then there's another question here again about uh so that was an answer in
01:01:05.820
response to a question about the negative effects it's going to have on the economy and
01:01:09.740
then they keep going with this line of questions summer are you concerned that the declaration of
01:01:14.620
a state of emergency uh will keep visitors um out of areas that are even not impacted by the fire
01:01:22.860
because of this idea that bc is now under a state of emergency well we were under a state of
01:01:27.900
an emergency for a year and a couple of months and we still had people coming uh you'll recall
01:01:33.900
that i was urging people to not come but they came anyway um which is i mean the question itself
01:01:40.380
is just so hypocritical to me because it's like i mean i guess they got to ask the questions but just
01:01:44.700
like two days ago i think that was richard zussman from ctv and uh i mean these people spilled a
01:01:50.540
lot of ink complaining about the fact that they hadn't declared the state of emergency and then they
01:01:55.660
turn around right away and they're like well what about the economy i mean you know did you consider
01:01:59.500
this it's like and and i mean you can you can sort of criticize them for this like i do but this is
01:02:06.460
what the opposition is doing as well now too so if you if you jump on the twitter accounts of all the
01:02:10.140
bc liberal mlas that's what they're talking about now is oh like they've gone back to the the mid
01:02:15.420
pandemic uh attack on on this government that they're not providing enough supports for small
01:02:21.980
business and in particular uh funding so here you have the free market coalition which has been
01:02:28.060
calling for more authoritarianism this whole you know for the last two years and now as soon as we
01:02:32.300
get into a fire situation that are also their biggest point of attack on the government is that
01:02:36.780
they're not funneling enough money to private business they're not funneling enough free taxpayer
01:02:42.140
dollars to private business owners that's basically what they're saying and the media just picks up on
01:02:47.340
this and kind of repeats it because i mean they don't really have the sophistication to to come
01:02:52.780
up with their own questions right and and this is this is the frustration it just keeps going on and
01:02:57.020
on so then um so yeah i mean that's i don't know if i should stop to let you jump in anytime you like
01:03:03.020
here but i i think that i think that you kind of hit it spot on i mean ultimately this is the other
01:03:08.140
problem with what's wrong with on the right like i mean i think there's a place to not be an austerity
01:03:12.460
conservative i don't think cutting cutting cutting the front line stuff always results in bad electoral
01:03:17.180
results later you know cut cut the managers don't cut the front line it's a waste of time
01:03:21.500
but but i think simultaneously the issue is that for conservatives like even if they are kind of big
01:03:27.580
state conservatives or whatever status conservatives i don't really count myself as one of those but
01:03:32.060
you know people are like that it's interesting because people are always interested in getting that
01:03:36.620
that free money to private industry i think a lot of run-of-the-mill conservatives are not okay with that i think
01:03:41.820
the average care is like no i don't get free money for my business or my my whatever i don't i don't
01:03:46.300
like that if i don't get it they don't get it and and why are these big businesses getting subsidized
01:03:50.700
again you know if they were if they're so good at business they wouldn't need to be subsidized
01:03:54.860
and i think that's a sentiment that right or left i think there's plenty of british colombians who could
01:03:58.700
completely say like no we shouldn't be handing out more money to people like just run your business
01:04:03.580
better or you might have to fold up shop and change some things well the the contradiction is squarely with
01:04:10.620
the opposition on this question because they cry to the rooftops for weeks over the need to declare
01:04:17.340
a state of emergency and then as soon as it's declared they start saying oh this is so difficult
01:04:21.500
on businesses and it was the government that declared the state of emergency so it's the government
01:04:26.860
that should give them taxpayer dollars to help keep them afloat but the problem with these businesses
01:04:32.060
isn't really one over demand uh as we'll we'll get into some of these questions uh in a couple of
01:04:38.460
other clips here the biggest problem faced by businesses right now across the board is a lack
01:04:43.660
of labor a shortage of labor and that's not just in bc that's happening all over the country and so in
01:04:50.940
the state and it's also happening in the us and if you watch sort of conservative media in the us who
01:04:55.740
generally sides with businesses on these kind of questions they're really criticized the reason they're
01:05:01.660
so the reason why republicans were so pro opposed to affording the same financial supports that are given
01:05:08.300
to businesses to regular working folks is because they're terrified that if you give some stimulus
01:05:13.980
money or some some support money to working folks that they're not going to go to work which is
01:05:21.100
a backwards argument if you sort of understand how the economy works in that like the american
01:05:27.740
government certainly didn't give anybody who wasn't a business or a rich business owner or a corporate
01:05:34.620
executive anywhere close to the amount of money that you would need to survive for more than like
01:05:38.700
a couple of weeks right so the argument that people aren't working because um because they're able to
01:05:46.780
just sit at home and get money doesn't make any sense at all what's happening is that like you know
01:05:52.540
you look in new york for instance where it probably endured the worst lockdown that hit the restaurant
01:05:58.220
sector and the the direct service sector the hardest uh there's a guy on the on youtube called uh louis
01:06:04.620
rossman who runs around new york with a camera just showing how dead everything closed everything is
01:06:10.060
i mean it's just sort of a ghost town in so many areas and so what happens to the workforce when that
01:06:14.860
happens well they go find work somewhere else they they often leave the city or they leave the state
01:06:19.500
we saw this in the caribou over the last we've seen it over the last three or four years as there's been
01:06:25.500
i think at least two evacuations over over that period of time where you get all these restaurants
01:06:30.380
they have to close down because the town gets evacuated and they don't reopen again when the
01:06:34.460
evacuation is lifted because those workers have moved on somewhere else and they've found work
01:06:39.740
somewhere else most of them probably went down to vancouver where there's a there's more jobs
01:06:44.300
and more job growth than in the interior there's virtually no job growth in the interior so you can't
01:06:49.740
so then the supply of labor goes down and what happens when the supply of something goes down
01:06:54.700
the price goes up and you know i got almost no time for joe biden uh i mean i think he's i think
01:07:04.060
he's everything he he exemplifies everything that is wrong with the democratic party and politics in
01:07:10.220
the u.s but a few weeks ago probably because he was i don't know um a little bit delusional at the
01:07:16.940
time or or office meds or who who knows what he sort of slipped up and said the only thing that i've ever
01:07:23.020
agreed with uh and he said that he was talking with a bunch of business owners who were complaining
01:07:28.300
to him these are the big companies like you know even amazon etc although amazon's doing quite well
01:07:33.180
we're saying look we're having real difficulties in this labor shortage issue and you know i quote
01:07:39.180
him directly biden said and i think he whispered it i should have got the clip he said yeah because
01:07:43.980
you're not paying them enough right and it was like this moment of sort of a this lucid realization
01:07:51.500
he sort of said what everybody should be saying which is when the when the supply of labor goes
01:07:57.020
down the price of labor goes up if you're a free marketeer you have to understand this
01:08:03.180
if you if you if you want to enact government policies that refuse to acknowledge that market
01:08:10.220
reality you're not actually a free marketeer what you want is an artificial cap and ceiling placed on
01:08:18.380
wages and then somehow force workers to come work for those low wages again when the market demands
01:08:24.300
a much higher amount and when you of course you can't you can't really force people to come work
01:08:28.620
for lower wages but what you can do and what we are doing is you can bring in more temporary foreign
01:08:34.380
workers to work for less and so instead of the market taking care of wages like so many libertarians
01:08:42.300
and free market fundamentalists say that it should when the when the rubber hits the road and workers
01:08:48.140
actually go well you know you're just not paying me enough to go work in that dangerous environment
01:08:54.140
or it's just easier for me to get a better paying job in some other jurisdiction instead of paying
01:08:59.180
more which is what the market would would demand that they do they opt for temporary foreign workers
01:09:05.180
and they go crying to the provincial government for for more funding which is not free market uh at all
01:09:12.140
and that's the big contradiction i i i don't have any caveats to that i mean again we'll see what
01:09:18.940
people have to say about the show later when it's actually broadcasted but i the fact of the matter is
01:09:23.180
that i think the conservatives really need to pull up their socks and in this area we we need the working
01:09:29.340
class not just as a voting block but we need them also as the bedrock of our society and people deserve
01:09:36.140
to be paid and they certainly deserve to be paid something that doesn't just keep them in poverty
01:09:41.580
um that's not rocket science i i do i do probably differ from you on a couple of accounts of the
01:09:47.820
methodologies that might be used so that we could we would differ all day on taxation and and a few other
01:09:53.580
areas but i but i think that we still are united on that one point which is that
01:09:58.300
uh poverty wages aren't wages they're just subsidized slavery and i think that we need
01:10:03.340
to do something about that fundamentally especially if we want this country to move from kind of its
01:10:08.380
backwater status of being somewhat a third world nation with nicer cars and faster internet uh to a
01:10:15.260
to supposedly a true g7 nation that actually has some mastery of its own its own borders and some
01:10:20.860
and masters in its own house yeah and remember like i'm not even articulating my own position on
01:10:26.060
this right like i you know i'm not a free marketeer i i i don't necessarily believe that the market
01:10:32.220
should dictate wages um i don't necessarily think that labor should be treated in our economy as a
01:10:38.300
as a commodity that is subject to the laws of supply and demand uh but i'm not the ones that i'm not the
01:10:45.420
one running around complaining about the labor shortage it's the free marketeers who are and so all
01:10:50.220
i'm doing is is is like shining some light on this contradiction you're either in favor of the free
01:10:57.180
market or you're not right and if you run around calling yourself a free marketeer um especially if
01:11:04.860
you are part of a party that brands itself as the free market coalition of british columbia
01:11:09.740
and you're running around complaining about a shortage of labor because you're not willing to
01:11:13.420
subject yourself to the free market uh when the supply of labor is low enough that the price is
01:11:19.420
high and you don't want to pay the market price for labor and you then turn to the state and say
01:11:25.020
i can't stay afloat because the workers are demanding too much money for the for what i used
01:11:29.500
to be able to pay them have to do i need public dollars to keep my business afloat instead of being
01:11:35.420
a real free marketeer and concluding that well if i can't afford to pay the market rate on labor
01:11:41.100
and stay in business then clearly i have a business model that's not working and the free market
01:11:45.180
dictates that my business should essentially evaporate and get out of the way so that another
01:11:50.620
better business model can come and provide the same service within the within the the market
01:11:54.780
conditions that exist you're not a free marketeer you're a socialist you're asking the state to bail
01:11:59.740
you out because you're not willing to subject yourself uh to the free market when it comes to the
01:12:04.140
commodity of labor that and it's a contradiction that's that's the only point i'm making which is that
01:12:09.100
there is absolutely no freak uh free market party uh in british columbia that's mainstream and has any
01:12:15.260
representation in in the legislature when the rubber hits the road so you have to stop listening to what
01:12:19.420
these not you personally but people have to stop listening to what these politicians say and watch
01:12:23.900
what they actually do when we get into these kind of situations it's very telling i i completely agree and
01:12:29.740
i but i mean this is also a problem even at the the federal level obviously we the tories have
01:12:35.660
failed to kind of articulate an alternative vision uh compared to the grits compared to the liberals
01:12:39.980
compared to the ndp uh and the greens for that matter and and and even the block they just don't
01:12:45.900
have an alternative vision that would say no we're going to try and decouple we're trying to couple big
01:12:50.940
business from subsidy we're going to try and let the market stand on its own two legs we're going to
01:12:56.540
try and let people bid bid their way up the chain and we're going to afford protections to workers that
01:13:03.420
ensure that as they gain more rights and privileges for themselves and wages those are those are not in
01:13:09.740
not enshrined constitutionally say but they are protected they can't just be withered away
01:13:14.300
by by fancy you know marketing rhetoric and by you know consultants who fly in and out of places
01:13:20.780
uh with their cheap suits and their terrible hotel bills uh you know we can we can move on from that
01:13:26.780
we can we can move on to some some to to uh well we are still a kingdom we're called the dominion but
01:13:31.260
we're actually we're going to be called the kingdom of cat we could move on to being a kingdom of
01:13:34.460
conscience and not just uh you know a rentier state yeah yeah i agree the um so the there's three more
01:13:43.340
clips here and there to do with um discussion about the border uh and we've we've had discussions about
01:13:49.500
this previously in at the beginning of the pandemic when the province uh uh was being pressured by the
01:13:56.380
same sort of professional managerial class types um to shut the border down between to stop americans
01:14:03.340
from coming into the country and uh and vice versa and you know i had been critical of the premier
01:14:09.020
because he basically said well you know it's federal jurisdiction we don't control the borders now i
01:14:13.420
wasn't critical of him because he was wrong he's right um but just because that's happens to be the
01:14:18.780
case doesn't mean that i think that uh bc premier uh shouldn't take a more proactive position in
01:14:25.260
patrolling our own borders uh but having said that i mean sort of the nuance of that argument you'll
01:14:30.060
recall at the time was that uh and i think you agreed with me was it we did just like i'm sort
01:14:34.940
of skeptical that we need to be in a state of emergency right now i was a little skeptical that
01:14:38.460
we needed to shut the borders down with the us i was more interested in shutting the borders down
01:14:43.100
between us and ontario um but uh they were ahead of us on vaccinations at that time in the us and
01:14:51.500
there just wasn't any evidence that a lot of uh what was being contracted in bc was coming from
01:14:58.540
people from seattle and oregon etc it was generally coming from people coming in from out of the country
01:15:03.340
on on planes etc uh anyway um now that we're back into the situation where you know we probably should
01:15:11.020
be rolling back some of these restrictions related to the pandemic this the wildfire has emerged as this
01:15:16.860
beautiful excuse for the professional managerial class to start calling about restrictions again
01:15:21.580
and so the majority of questions uh from this point on were about the border closures and here he goes
01:15:27.020
some time now the federal government is responsible for our borders we have had input certainly at the
01:15:33.100
front end urging closures and we've had input uh throughout this time engaging uh as provincial
01:15:39.180
leaders with the federal government on how best to restart our integration with the rest of the world
01:15:45.980
the federal government made a decision to open to u.s citizens on the 9th doubly vaccinated citizens on
01:15:52.620
the 9th of august and i can't predict or control what the u.s does i will say that i do know that
01:15:59.100
canadians have there are some more vaccinations in canada than there is in the united states
01:16:04.700
and based on my experience talking to people looking at opinion research i rather doubt that people will be
01:16:11.820
lining up in large numbers to travel south until they feel confident that the pandemic is well and truly
01:16:17.340
behind us um so he probably just jumped to the next one as well because he he mentions a couple times
01:16:24.220
here uh this new requirement now that you have for americans that they have to be double vaccinated
01:16:32.460
in order to come across let me just play this because it's kind of the same have a whole host of other
01:16:36.300
ways for americans to come into british columbia up and down the coast so we want to be there with
01:16:41.500
the federal government to manage that to protect people and if you haven't had two doses uh if i
01:16:47.900
heard the prime minister correctly and i'm confident that i did you're not allowed in the country and we
01:16:52.540
need to make sure that we're enforcing that and the province stands ready to help the federal government in
01:16:56.620
that regard that's very concerning to me um i don't know how you feel about that but i i i mean the
01:17:04.620
the problem i can see right at the outset in us really firmly getting behind this decision the
01:17:09.260
americans have made to require two doses it was probably and there's probably a response to us we
01:17:13.740
probably requested it at the federal level but that goes both ways and here's here's the obvious problem
01:17:19.340
like you know people will recall i think sometime last month bruce springsteen played uh sort of the
01:17:25.260
first post-pandemic concert in new york and anybody who had only received the astrazeneca vaccine was
01:17:31.340
barred entry uh because the americans the americans don't recognize that as a as as a legitimate
01:17:37.980
vaccine so this is a problem so we get behind uh you know he he here's our premier saying we should
01:17:45.820
be enforcing this two vaccine requirement double vaccine requirement in order for people to come
01:17:50.860
across the border well what if the americans decide that they're not going to admit anybody who's
01:17:55.420
only been vaccinated with the astrazeneca vaccine which is the entire millennial population basically
01:18:01.180
and pretty much my i mean it's pretty much my entire generation as well uh all the gen x etc the
01:18:08.140
only reason i didn't get i mean i've been vaccinated once i haven't got my second one yet uh and the only
01:18:12.860
reason i didn't get astrazeneca is because i waited so much longer than everybody my age did and so the the
01:18:18.380
supply was already gone from the private sector that was distributing it i went through the regular vaccine
01:18:22.620
center and got i think it was that moderna one and i suspect that'll be the second dose they give me
01:18:27.820
uh so wouldn't it be funny if after you know we so fervently get behind this decision the us has made
01:18:34.860
to in to help them enforce uh the two vaccine requirement for americans to come across the
01:18:40.380
border if in response the americans come out and say uh yeah well we also require two vaccines but if
01:18:46.780
any of those vaccines were astrazeneca you can't come that's an entire generation of people that won't be
01:18:51.500
able they're going to have to go get vaccinated a third or fourth time i guess just to meet this
01:18:55.580
stupid requirement um and so this is really a problem i think i i think that uh the joke's
01:19:06.140
going to be on anybody who thinks the vaccine passport's going to work i mean i already know
01:19:09.820
people who have obtained paperwork that says they're vaccinated without having ever been vaccinated
01:19:15.260
and uh good for them uh cheers to you i i plan on procuring myself some someday if that's necessary
01:19:21.740
but the the issue that even gets further than that is is quite frankly that it is just another way to
01:19:29.180
kind of divide up the class of people uh and to try and reclassify people as you know as degenerates
01:19:37.180
of human deplorables whatever it's it's just another methodology of power regardless of one's fears
01:19:42.060
about the virus or one's belief in the efficacy of the vaccines it i don't understand how they're
01:19:49.740
going to be able to really get this done i i don't think it's going to happen and even if they do manage
01:19:54.940
to get the vaccine passport thing rolling for a short amount of time i guess for those of us who remain
01:19:59.340
unvaccinated and have no plans to get vaccinated we just don't get to go on international trips for a
01:20:04.700
while i'm sure that that'll dissipate at some point uh but no i mean it makes it for a little bit
01:20:09.500
cheap well not for traveling in Canada cheap but you know i guess we just get to stay home and explore
01:20:21.100
yeah it's um it's a it's a big problem uh from my perspective i think like it's not a new thing that
01:20:31.180
countries will require certain vaccines in order to travel to them and in fact like you know i
01:20:36.140
remember traveling to venezuela a few years ago and there was a whole list of different vaccines that
01:20:40.060
that were recommended i'm not sure if any were necessarily required by the
01:20:43.660
by the venezuelan government but i went and got them because there's uh there's maladies and
01:20:49.260
different viruses and diseases uh in in other areas of the world that i don't necessarily have
01:20:55.020
resistance to because i live uh in a in a comparatively uh virus-free uh portion of the world
01:21:03.900
because it can be so cold up here right so a lot of a lot of what exists in sort of you know southern
01:21:09.420
north america central america and even south america just doesn't exist up here in prince george which
01:21:14.460
means we're we're a bit more uh we're a bit less we gotta get you a microphone mute yeah i know i got
01:21:21.180
one over here don't worry it's all pre-recorded we can edit that stuff out there it is so so it's not new
01:21:27.340
that people might might require or or even be well advised to get some vaccines for very like you
01:21:33.740
definitely want to get malaria shots and you want to get dengue fever shots and those kind of things
01:21:38.140
when you go traveling around in south america um so i'm not as i'm not necessarily as worried about
01:21:44.140
that but i am worried about vaccine passports absolutely and and i disagree with you in the
01:21:50.380
sense that you have any skepticism that they'll be able to enforce this thing they will absolutely be
01:21:55.180
able to enforce it that's what's so frightening is if they decide to do what they've done in some
01:22:00.140
other countries like i mean the worst videos that i saw were coming out of australia when they decided
01:22:04.860
that they were going to start enforcing mandatory masks outside on the street and very early in the
01:22:10.860
pandemic you saw these videos rolling out of police officers like tackling women in the streets
01:22:17.260
because they weren't wearing masks which it's like what are you trying to accomplish here you're
01:22:21.100
worried about more people contracting the virus and so you go attack somebody who's not wearing
01:22:26.540
a mask outdoors and you rub your body all over them and you and you get like really close and in
01:22:31.420
their face like if they're infected you're now infected and you're going to infect your family
01:22:35.740
it's stupid to ask to require police to do that kind of enforcement but never underestimate the
01:22:41.580
stupidity of these authoritarian loving governments run by the professional managerial class so they can
01:22:47.340
absolutely do that the other problem is is they require businesses to enforce this stuff which is
01:22:51.420
unfair for businesses so that's why you get all these situations where you know business owners and
01:22:56.460
servers and and all you know front counter staff are getting into fights with with the public because
01:23:02.700
the government has just downloaded the uh the enforcement of these stupid measures these this lockdown
01:23:08.860
on to businesses that they're not police they you know they depending on where they might be located
01:23:14.380
they might have to hire a security guard here and there but most small businesses don't have a
01:23:18.300
security guard on staff all the time they can't afford that and now you're putting like you know
01:23:23.340
i remember when i used to work in the service sector one of the biggest things we'd tell people
01:23:27.420
when we were training them is if you encounter a shoplifter or somebody who's potentially being violent
01:23:32.060
it's not your job to go stop them right like it theft and and that kind of thing is sort of a
01:23:39.100
like you can insure against that it's it's it's a cost of doing business for retail and service
01:23:44.380
outlets uh and you and the owner should take uh steps to try to mitigate against that and protect
01:23:49.980
against it but you don't put your own safety at risk as a worker especially if you're making like
01:23:54.540
minimum wage or not much more than that you don't put your own safety at risk to go you know tackle
01:24:00.220
somebody who is shoplifting from your employer it's not it's not your pocket they're they're picking
01:24:05.580
uh why would you why would you uh put your own flesh at risk you don't know what they're packing
01:24:10.780
right and so and and this is what government is asking small businesses to do and some some business
01:24:16.300
owners i think the more uh enlightened ones some of them have been forced to make uh decisions just
01:24:22.540
to shut things down because they don't want to put themselves and their staff in these dangerous
01:24:26.300
situations where they have to confront these people that simply refuse to put a mask on um and and
01:24:32.140
they shouldn't have to uh and and that's that's essentially what uh what these what these guys
01:24:38.140
are requiring of businesses and so that's that's concerning stuff it is concerning and i'm not
01:24:43.340
saying that it's impossible for the government to enforce such things i also do at the same time
01:24:47.420
believe the government's incompetence often gets in the way of their their grand plans of mice and
01:24:52.620
men as we come kind of to the end of our hour here uh aaron do you got one more clip for us or uh
01:24:58.620
uh just one more example of um how stupid these questions are from and hypocritical they are from
01:25:04.700
media yeah just the one more and then then we're pretty much done here let me just play it challenging
01:25:08.700
period of time lisa do you have a follow-up yes and talking about border reopening and and more
01:25:16.380
americans will be coming up here will there be more support for you know the tourism operators are
01:25:24.060
hurting so hard because they don't have enough staff that that's in so many different areas and
01:25:28.300
because we rely on people coming from other countries to work here and take jobs that we
01:25:31.820
don't have will there be more assistance for getting people from australia from other countries
01:25:36.380
that come here to work during you know seasons to get them here so that these businesses can
01:25:41.580
be running full speed versus having to turn away clients because they don't have a staff
01:25:45.740
to take care of them well on the agriculture side many uh operators to depend on temporary foreign
01:25:51.980
workers from uh south of us and we have been working with industry with the agriculture sector
01:25:59.180
we've been vaccinating uh incoming uh workers uh so that we can ensure that as they come into
01:26:05.260
into british columbia that they are they are safe and they're and keeping uh the people they work
01:26:10.460
with safe so we put in place programs and protocols to help with the labor shortages we have in some sectors
01:26:17.100
but we are now past the employment rate we had in february of 2020. we have more people working
01:26:23.340
today than we did then and i hear from every sector we have a shortage of labor i've just
01:26:29.180
so this sort of just elucidates what we've been what we've been talking about already and that there's
01:26:33.260
there's a clearly a shortage of labor i when the question was being asked i kind of it it almost
01:26:38.220
achieved the impossible by forcing me to feel sorry for horgan here and that you know they've been
01:26:43.340
the same people who have been yelling at him for weeks to call a state of emergency are now saying
01:26:47.740
are you going to put money into these businesses that are now hurting because of the decision you
01:26:51.020
made to call a state of emergency but then he you know his response is well we're just going to you
01:26:56.940
know there's a shortage of labor so we're just going to bring in more temporary foreign workers and
01:26:59.980
and don't worry we're able to vax like we can require them to get vaccinated and that's the thing is
01:27:04.540
that if you're a temporary foreign worker you have no rights you can't even come into the country
01:27:08.380
unless you get a jab so you definitely they're definitely in this situation where where they're
01:27:12.860
subjected to government mandated vaccinations which if if we want the freedom uh bestowed to us
01:27:18.940
to not get a vaccine we should also expect that temporary foreign workers coming in if they must
01:27:23.740
come in should be extended that same same freedom as us and should be paid the same as us and they're
01:27:29.180
not and that's that's the thing so now you have this situation where the bc nep government which for
01:27:34.380
years was critical of the temporary foreign worker program is now relying on that as a crutch
01:27:38.940
to try to solve this labor shortage which results from workers going in a pandemic or a state of
01:27:45.500
emergency you're not paying me enough to put myself at risk i'm going to go to some other
01:27:49.900
jurisdiction uh because why wouldn't i i'm going to make the best decision for me and so now you've
01:27:54.380
got a bc ndp premier who sounds exactly like a bc liberal premier saying the way out of this mess is
01:28:00.220
more temporary foreign workers and don't worry we can force the injections into them because
01:28:04.300
they have no rights in this country uh it's just i mean there's so much hypocrisy both from the media
01:28:09.420
and these politicians the british columbians should be you know should be concerned and angry about this
01:28:14.460
stuff i think and so this you know sorry to throw so many clips uh from the from the premier at you
01:28:19.420
here but i thought this interview in particular uh was was a great example and just encapsulated so
01:28:25.580
many of the problems that we're facing here in british columbia right now the other the other
01:28:29.740
interesting piece of course is that you know to his left i guess on this side actually on his left
01:28:35.180
shoulder there is just off camera is the forest minister who through the duration of this interview
01:28:39.900
i think says nothing um and it she's been under fire prior to the wildfire for a long time and now
01:28:46.620
we've got the state of emergency situation and he comes in and sort of eats up all the the spotlight
01:28:51.580
and i don't think it's necessarily because he wants to i think it's because there's this recognition
01:28:55.740
that she is floundering on this file and isn't able to sort of take the tough the tough questions
01:29:01.580
now contrast this to can you imagine if that was the case at during the entire time of the covet
01:29:07.740
pandemic where the health minister adrian dix just didn't do any talking just sort of vanished
01:29:12.060
and the premier had to come in and do this i mean what kind of uh what kind of um uh
01:29:19.660
confidence does that instill amongst british columbians in our forest minister
01:29:23.260
so i wouldn't be surprised uh if a cabinet shuffle comes up soon that you see uh cat conroy shuffled
01:29:29.660
out and then the question is well who would be a great minister of forests and i would say um
01:29:36.220
probably harry harry baines would be good although he's a minister of labor right now but we'll see
01:29:41.420
we'll see what they decide to do i know i i don't think there's any apologies necessary aaron i mean
01:29:47.340
these are important uh concepts that are being brought up and i do think uh if nothing else and to
01:29:51.740
borrow from again our good friends uh vocabulary uh it appears then that everything is captured
01:29:57.500
when an ndp premier of bc which is a wild province a bizarre place of extreme right extreme left kind of
01:30:04.780
strange north islanders and bizarre interiors and then of course the urbanites it's just a bizarre
01:30:09.980
place and yet even there in that diverse land called british columbia we can hear the exact same words
01:30:16.700
come out of the mouth of two different people who supposedly cling to two completely different
01:30:20.460
political philosophies uh who rule us from victoria that that sounds like captured to me
01:30:25.980
and that sounds like we need to do something pretty drastic in order to get out of the narrative we're
01:30:30.620
currently stuck in agreed absolutely i want to say thank you again so much for joining us today aaron
01:30:37.820
again here bricking the show with us uh before we go on hiatus i really appreciate your presence here
01:30:43.100
and i'm very thankful for all the contributions you and all of our other contributors have made over the
01:30:47.580
course of these 15 weeks well if if you can indulge me for a moment i i just want to say um given that
01:30:53.180
we won't be doing this for a little while now how much of a pleasure it has been to to do these shows
01:30:57.500
with you i think you're filling a uh a niche here that needs to be filled in british columbia you just
01:31:02.620
don't see the kind of commentary uh in any other media outlet that you see uh from from this show sort of
01:31:10.300
of criticizing both sides when it when it needs to happen and eschewing sort of partisan allegiance
01:31:15.500
um uh and and and and and i think you know i i look forward to whatever the new format looks like but
01:31:22.540
hopefully it doesn't take too long for you to come back because you're filling an important role in
01:31:25.420
this province thank you aaron well we're gonna call that a day and i'm gonna wave goodbye i'm gonna do
01:31:32.140
a little bit of a close out here and then uh head on out all right thanks man thank you so much aaron
01:31:37.580
well that was mountain standard time uh week 15 and we're here at the end of these things not quite
01:31:46.460
the end of all things necessarily uh but the end of these things and i think that as a concluding
01:31:53.020
point at least on my end uh we're hopeful deeply hopeful of of a better future for this country uh
01:32:01.020
whatever parts of this country continue to be whole or one but i i do believe there's
01:32:07.100
also some real dark nights of the soul ahead of us uh as a culture as a people uh as a land that is
01:32:13.100
wrestling with its very identity its background its history and where to go to from here my only piece
01:32:18.220
of advice on all that count is that certainly things must change and perhaps they even do need to change
01:32:26.780
radically but in the end they need to have buy-in and the buy-in from at least a majority of the
01:32:31.500
population and certainly those elements of the population that feel marginalized and ignored
01:32:36.220
and until that's understood there is going to be a complete disconnect disconnect between those who
01:32:41.820
rule us and those who are ruled and that can't go on forever that will eventually result in violence
01:32:50.460
and will eventually cause some very deep problems in this country
01:32:56.300
there are things that are being said in this country that i never thought i'd hear the things being
01:33:00.140
done in this country i never thought i'd see there are attitudes being taken in this country i never
01:33:05.020
thought people would entertain that is not a recipe for success if we hope to move forward as a nation
01:33:12.060
we will require some very serious renovation in the not-so-distant future thank you for watching
01:33:19.340
that was mountain standard time i'm nathan guida we'll see you after the hiatus