00:02:30.000Good morning, and welcome to Mountain Standard Time.
00:02:55.820I'm your host, Nathan Gita, and today we will be speaking with the Honourable Jay Hill of the Maverick Party in the second half.
00:03:03.480And for the first half, we'll be taking your comments, questions, and concerns, some interaction again, kind of an opening statement here, on the census and what does that mean to you.
00:03:13.560Remember to like and subscribe to The Western Standard on Facebook as well as YouTube, and don't forget to subscribe to us on the site.
00:03:20.500We don't get any government dollars, this isn't the CBC, so if you enjoy our content, well, please support us.
00:09:38.440So you get Samuel saying that if you have a king over you, he will dominate you, he will put your sons into his armies, he'll take your daughters for his harem and for his wine girls and everything else.
00:09:49.760And he's going to tax all your stuff, he's going to take your best stuff for himself and aggrandize himself, and then he will coerce you into wars and put you into poverty and abuse you.
00:10:00.900And that's what he says, that's essentially him describing the state, right?
00:10:03.940He's talking about the king, but what did, what did Louis, is it Louis the 16th, the 17th, the sun king, what did Louis say, right, just before the revolution took his head?
00:10:13.100I am the state, right, so the embodiment of the state, the embodiment of government in the sovereign, right, that was what Samuel's pointing to there and saying, look, he will be the manifestation of all that is wrong with power and coercion and everything else.
00:10:27.480And then we get to, you know, the New Testament.
00:10:30.580The New Testament says kind of the same thing to a certain point,
00:10:32.960but says that we still have to live in this society,
00:10:34.820so render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, render unto God what is God's.
00:10:38.400I'm not just talking about those things because I'm some kind of Bible thumper or something.
00:10:41.640I'm talking about those things because they're real illusions that have a deep belonging,
00:10:45.400especially for those of us right of center, but they have a clear sense.
00:10:48.320If we get into modern political theory, right,
00:10:50.500the idea was that absolute monarchy corrupted absolutely,
00:10:53.820But that was, interestingly enough, that was a result of the nation-state, not a beforehand thing.
00:10:59.420So if you go to the pre-modern era, so about five minutes before the Reformation starts,
00:11:05.640what you have are all these little dukedoms and little kingdoms, little princelings.
00:11:50.960So the idea that we're not going to have belonging based on the kind of universal morality or calling and something that transcends tribalism.
00:11:58.600We're going to build our tribes bigger, right?
00:12:01.440And so we're going to be Burgons and we're going to be French and we're going to be Basques and all these kind of things are going to come together.0.63
00:12:09.480And we're going to have Spain, we're going to have France, we're going to have England, we're going to have Germany.
00:12:12.680Germany got very late in the game, obviously, didn't form until 1871.
00:12:15.940but all these pieces are going to come together
00:12:19.160and the nation state is what's going to project power into the world
00:49:07.160There are all these problems that plague Canada, all of Canada, the kingdom of Canada, right, the dominion of Canada.
00:49:15.460And I would hope that all of Canada could solve those problems, but we might have to solve them together alone, in a sense, with our local communities.
00:49:25.340It can't just be the 10 premiers plus the prime minister and then the three guys from the territories.
00:49:29.960It can't be even just our Western premiers coming together and solving this problem.
00:49:36.280It might need to be broken down to the point where, I guess this is the problem.
00:49:39.700If I'm a sovereignist, I'm a sovereignist that's a sovereignist of my town and my region.
00:49:45.080I don't know how to stand in solidarity perfectly with the idea of all of Western Canada leaving Ottawa,
00:49:50.520but I do know how to get even my small area to leave Victoria,
00:49:54.420or at least that I could reason through that, at least to tell Victoria to get out of our lives.
00:50:00.100I'm sure that there are many people in Alberta that could feel the same way.
00:50:03.240this is the thing about sovereignty is that there's a real danger that places like Calgary
00:50:09.000and Edmonton, I prefer to call it Redmonton, start running the show, right? So as if rural
00:50:16.720people in Alberta don't already feel left out, the same as us in BC. And I'm not trying to
00:50:22.060denigrate anyone that lives in Edmonton or in Calgary. I'm just saying that, you know,
00:50:26.960the enemy of my enemy is my friend. And right now, people in rural Alberta and a lot of people
00:50:31.860and suburban Alberta all feel that the government's not listening to them
00:50:37.840and that they want out, they want to do something different.
00:50:41.000Well, what happens as soon as you get, be careful what you wish for, right?
00:50:51.040Now Calgary is the power center and Canmore is not.
00:50:54.900So how's Canmore and Calgary, how are they going to battle it out
00:50:58.000to decide who's in charge and what's going to happen next?
00:51:00.560And, you know, what if the Canmore people don't want all the Calgary people to come and move in there and then they got to fight about that?
00:51:07.080It's it's it's a difficult thing. It's a difficult thing.
00:51:10.340So with with Canada, all I know is that we are facing some serious issues right now.
00:51:18.160We're literally looking at a vaccine rollout that's been completely botched up.
00:51:21.800We're looking at the census that, you know, I'm interested to see what kind of questions are on it this year, especially in light of covid and everything else.
00:51:28.240i'm gonna i'm gonna do some bits on that tomorrow i just opened the package today so i'm gonna do
00:51:33.380some bits on it tomorrow after i complete the package and at least look through the questions
00:51:38.560and then uh yeah and i'm gonna write on it this week i think as well but but yeah again the the
00:51:44.740census the logistics the vaccine this country has lost confidence in itself the separation the
00:51:52.460sovereignness the mistreatment of the west by the trudeau government mistreatment of everybody by
00:51:56.720Trudeau government I mean the Trudeau government's abusing this entire country I think I think
00:52:00.020central Canadians are actually getting just as abused by the Trudeau government but it just
00:52:04.840looks nicer just looks prettier but it's not huge protest in Quebec the other day I think for uh for
00:52:10.740no more lockdowns and the curfews and the masks and everything it's just nonsense and I think I
00:52:16.720think that people are finally trying to snap onto this but the question is where to from here I mean
00:52:21.060we're not america we don't really have a legacy like america does throwing off its fetters and
00:52:27.540and getting getting all hoorah about what they're gonna do and we we have to kind of acknowledge
00:52:34.740that that you know i mean for myself i'm still a monarchist and it's a hard thing to kind of
00:52:41.440reconcile like so what where to from here what to from here what what does it look like what does
00:52:48.040it mean uh we need a vision for the country and that comes all the way back to the stephen harper
00:52:53.000thing what was harper's greatest sin no offense to harper himself is a lack of vision for the
00:52:58.340country or not communicating that vision very well and when he failed to do that he left a big
00:53:05.380vacuum this country had been ruled by the liberal party for years for years and he had a chance
00:53:13.580while they were in third place to basically censor them not censor them and then like ban them but
00:53:18.460just be a bully be a bully a bit and bully them around a bit it's like nope you've had the run
00:53:23.360of the place for a century you ruined it i'm gonna push you around i'm gonna denigrate you i'm gonna
00:53:28.360make everybody know be ashamed to have anything to do with you the same way you do to us and you0.95
00:53:34.140deserve it you deserve it for the way that you've run this country the way you've hurt this country
01:04:29.640Really, really what happens was, I think, similar to a lot of what's here,
01:04:36.280and following the 29th election, it was a bit of a real fight on this 20th year.
01:04:44.980when Prime Minister Trudeau got re-elected, albeit with a minority instead of his majority.
01:04:51.380And what we saw was that there was a huge increase in interest in the West charting its own course.
01:04:59.100And it manifested itself by people responding to a sort of a call to arms by Wexit movement.
01:05:07.760Of course, that stands for West Exit, and it's a play on the term out of Britain with Brexit out of the European Common Market.
01:05:19.280I obviously as well was attracted to that despite my former, originally as a reformer, then Canadian Alliance Member of Parliament, and ultimately a Conservative Party Member of Parliament, Nathan.
01:05:33.580and I ended my career, as most people now know, sitting in Prime Minister Harper's cabinet
01:05:41.180and resigned, or what I thought was resigned from public life in 2010.
01:05:47.020And it was so clear, I think, to the vast majority of Westerners
01:05:55.980that our current Prime Minister was the most unqualified, unprincipled, unfit individual to
01:06:04.940ever occupy the Prime Minister's office. And yet Central and Eastern Canadians, for whatever0.95
01:06:10.720reasons, re-elected him. And there was just this sense of betrayal, as I say, on the part of most
01:06:20.300Westerners dare I say it even anguish and anger and I like many others said well clearly what
01:06:29.580this is is the worst possible example of why confederation does not work for this country
01:06:35.900of Canada, that one region like Canada to re-elect the highest on the land and to, quote,
01:06:49.900govern over us. And so this dismayed me, on my part, presented me with a dilemma.
01:07:39.140One is to modernize the federal institution, to ensure that either one is the West, or
01:07:47.800Secondly, if that was a word on the word on the part of Central, Eastern Canadians, then we would to chart our own course, lay the foundations for independence referendums in the Western provinces, try and convince provincial governments across the West that that's the only feasible or practical path forward for the West.
01:08:16.000And that really is what led me to stepping back out of the shadows.
01:08:21.280I was happily retired, spending time with my grandchildren.
01:08:24.540But last June, a small group of us, in fact, eight individuals volunteered our time to form a board.
01:08:32.820The existing leader of Wexit Canada, which had applied for registration with Elections Canada, stepped aside.
01:08:41.760and I volunteered to serve as interim leader and, as I say, these seven individuals,
01:08:50.720some of whom were on the original board and were the original organizers of Wexit Canada,
01:08:57.520and the remainder were new people, new to the board, and they stepped forward. We volunteered
01:09:03.680to try and build an alternative for Western Canada. And so we proceeded from there. We
01:09:09.360We designed and communicated a mission statement, we formulated our guiding principles for the
01:09:19.480party and then more recently we've, oh, and then in there as well, we had to come to the
01:09:26.700position of developing a new name, hence Maverick.
01:09:31.280We can get into a discussion of how that came about, but that was in mid-September of last
01:09:37.920year. And then more recently, we've started organizing electoral district associations
01:09:43.460across Western Canada. We've nominated a, appointed a few candidates. We can talk about
01:09:50.140the process we've used for that. And then we also, we've also recently released our draft
01:10:00.720platform, which will probably carry us into the next election, depending on when it is.
01:10:05.400let's talk about the next election just briefly there for a moment do you do you think we're
01:10:11.220headed into one for this spring or do you think we're headed in for one for this fall it's i guess
01:10:15.440we're at the end of spring pretty much here yes we are uh we're now uh basically looking at a
01:10:25.300summer election if the writ was to drop um i think that in all likelihood i felt for quite some time
01:10:33.400the Prime Minister would like to go. I think that he believes his polls and his internal polls
01:10:37.800probably even show he's more popular in Central and Eastern Canada than he was in the fall of
01:10:43.8002019. I think that if he had his way, he would probably call an early election. There's a couple
01:10:54.520of things that are standing in his way. One is a bill that's before the House and so far he's
01:11:01.320failed to get any support from the Conservatives to move it along through the parliamentary process,
01:11:07.320that bill would allow Elections Canada to make certain changes in order to effectively operate
01:11:16.680an election, a federal election during our current situation with the COVID pandemic.
01:11:23.760So that's a bit of a problem for him. And then probably more important, his ineffectiveness and
01:11:30.640inability to secure sufficient supply of vaccines for Canadians, I think has to be worrisome for
01:11:41.200them because as we saw with the recent provincial election in Newfoundland, things could go sideways
01:11:48.960pretty quickly if we experienced, for example, over the summer, a potential for a fourth wave
01:11:56.480uh in different provinces or indeed across the land so that has to be of concern to him because
01:12:02.240perhaps he would wear some of that because of the errors and judgment that we've seen
01:12:06.960from the federal government on this issue over the past year
01:12:12.720and and i think that with with the what's happening with covet and everything else like
01:12:17.200everything's very tense not just about the nature of the election but but what it would look like
01:12:22.720for policy we've had a couple of covet elections throughout uh the pandemic has that
01:12:29.360is is that is are those models and and do those models favor an insurgent party like yourself
01:12:37.340well i mean i guess that's debatable it depends on how the campaign will unfold i mean
01:12:43.680up until we saw a very narrow victory for the liberals in newfoundland uh what we'd seen was
01:12:52.680a succession of governments returned to power. In fact, I think it was two of them in New Brunswick
01:13:01.940and British Columbia that went from a minority to a majority. So obviously that is what Prime
01:13:08.100Minister Trudeau would like to see happen on the national level. Saskatchewan, of course,
01:13:12.980they had a majority SAS party government and it was returned in overwhelming numbers because it's
01:13:18.340one of the more popular governments across the country. So I guess the bottom line there is that
01:13:24.820nobody lost. So your question about whether a early, what I would class possibly as an
01:13:32.040unnecessary election would benefit a party like Maverick, it remains a big unknown, of course.
01:13:40.600It would be a very unusual election, as you can imagine, just as the ones were provincially in the
01:13:46.360fact that a lot of it would be conducted via social media, just as we're conducting this
01:13:51.560interview today, Nathan. So I really don't know how that would play out and what effect that
01:13:58.560would have on the voting public. I think that there's going to be a huge opportunity in Western
01:14:04.400Canada, obviously, for Maverick to convey our central message about the unfairness of confederation
01:14:11.240and about the fact that if Westerners really want true Western representation,
01:14:18.480rather than electing members of parliament from whichever party, national party,
01:14:23.480that are going to endeavor to appease the voters in central and eastern Canada,
01:14:30.980they will have the opportunity, hopefully, to elect maverick members of parliament
01:14:37.320that will provide accurate representation.
01:14:39.760accurate representation this has been an ongoing problem since your first uh your first trip to
01:14:47.100parliament back in 93 uh you belong to the class of 93 to the reform movement and and the projects
01:14:54.620thereof what what after almost 30 years what what do you know differently now that you didn't know
01:15:02.020then what what had you hoped to do then that you've had to kind of make make decisions now
01:15:07.760and policy now that that's different or is it the same or did the project just not get complete
01:15:14.560well i think what is different and i have freely admitted to talk show hosts and reporters and
01:15:21.440and the media nathan over the last uh 10 months since we started this uh exercise i freely admitted
01:15:30.480to being a slow learner and I don't say that with a lot of pride. I believe like a lot of reformers
01:15:40.640that started out in the mid-80s that we did accomplish things. There's things about my
01:15:45.840political career, the 17 years that I spent representing the people of Northeastern British
01:15:51.120Columbia in Ottawa. There's things that I am quite proud of. I'm quite proud of a number of things,
01:15:57.440for example, that we accomplished with Prime Minister Harper and the Conservative government.
01:16:04.700Having said all of that, what I've come to realize and what I am trying to communicate
01:16:10.120to Westerners is that for those that are Conservative-minded and believe that the
01:16:19.260country is best served by Conservative governments, I'm asking them if they are getting tired
01:16:26.500of seeing in our lifetimes and in former generations in Canada, this constant flip-flopping
01:16:36.060back and forth throughout our history between conservative and liberal governments.
01:16:42.180Because the reality is that whether it was Prime Minister Trudeau's father in that government,
01:18:57.380What do you think is the appetite for separation in the West?
01:19:01.420Are people still trying to keep Canada together, at least keep the borders the same,
01:19:05.720maybe change the arrangement inside or are people ready starting to get ready to to leave
01:19:10.400well i think that a lot of westerners as i've said nathan recognize that confederation is broken
01:19:17.980it just simply doesn't work it was put into place in the 1800s under the old model of upper and
01:19:25.440lower canada and the west has been used and abused ever since that's not saying for a minute that we
01:19:33.800haven't benefited all of us from being Canadians. Of course, we have. And of course, most people are
01:19:39.420still profoundly patriotic and love being Canadian and all that that stands for. But having said that,
01:19:47.340I think we're way past time to modernize our constitution to ensure that Ottawa doesn't
01:19:54.200dictate to the outer regions, in particular to Western Canada. We see that in the constant
01:20:02.740drain of financial resources through the so-called equalization formula. We see that with laws that
01:20:09.220are passed that dramatically impact on our future and the future of our children and grandchildren,
01:20:17.320laws like the ban of oil tankers off the northern coast of the Pacific, off our British Columbia
01:20:26.020Coast. When tankers come into Eastern Canada every day from countries that have far less
01:20:35.460standards for human rights, for environmental standards, for labour standards, and yet we
01:20:44.740import, we, Canada, Eastern Canada imports billions of gallons of oil every year in that way.
01:20:55.060And so, you know, the West says, well, why the discrimination? Why two different rules under
01:21:01.380Confederation? So, I think that there is a growing appetite for fairness. And we've seen
01:21:06.980that manifested itself, especially on the prairies, especially Alberta and Saskatchewan,
01:21:11.940the government's calling for greater autonomy. Here in Alberta, we've had this,
01:21:17.460fairly recently, a fair deal panel that had travelled the province, come up with a strong
01:21:24.260list of recommendations that they made to the Alberta government that has manifested itself in
01:21:30.100at least in some policy direction for the Jason Kenney government to try and achieve greater
01:21:35.860autonomy on a range of issues such as we've seen Quebec secure for itself over the years,
01:21:43.060whether it's in the area of immigration, whether it's in the area of their own police force,
01:21:47.460you can go down the list, their own pension plan. These are all things that Quebec has,
01:21:54.980and in some cases has had for years. And we're increasingly seeing, especially in Alberta,
01:22:01.140but in other provinces as well, saying, well, why don't we have that level of autonomy under
01:22:06.420Confederation? So sure, I believe that the majority of Westerners, I believe the Poles are
01:22:13.780right. The majority of Westerners would love to remain Canadian if we could arrive at an1.00
01:22:18.660arrangement where we could be treated fairly under Confederation. But right now, that's not
01:22:26.500happening. There's not an appetite for that. And I would argue that potentially the provincial
01:22:31.300governments are not moving quickly enough to see that happen. Part of that, Nathan, is that
01:22:39.540that all governments across the land are consumed with this battle with this virus right now
01:22:46.100and decisions that they feel they are forced to be to make in that regard.
01:22:51.420So it's thrown a lot of legislative agendas, not only in the provinces, but in Ottawa off track, obviously.
01:23:01.260This is an ongoing debate in the West, obviously.
01:23:04.960Are we going to stay? Are we going to go?
01:23:06.680do we think we can get anything properly to go our way or people just never going to give us
01:23:11.840never going to give us a fair shake a just shake when it comes to selecting candidates to represent
01:23:17.280your two tracks these are these are serious policy positions uh more serious than have been in many
01:23:22.400years um probably only notable exception to that would be when when trudeau really promised that
01:23:28.380there'd be the last first past the post election and marijuana would be legalized um outside of
01:23:33.340there hadn't been a lot of new ideas for a while maybe scrapping the scrapping not just the carbon
01:23:37.820tax federally but the scrapping the gun the long gun registry but this is a serious idea of
01:23:43.340constitutional reform or possibly the the west leaving in a wexit move when you're looking for
01:23:49.100candidates how do you discern which candidate would be best representing uh these ideas and
01:23:54.060and representing the people they'll represent out west well uh as you can guess from uh the
01:24:01.660perspective of a new political party in our infancy. We're only 10-months old since we began
01:24:09.180this exercise at the end of June. In fact, we're just over 7-months old as the Maverick Party.
01:24:14.860We're still in very early stages of evolution, but we have put in what we believe a very robust,
01:24:22.380somewhat onerous candidate selection process to try and ensure that we have the best candidates
01:24:29.260possible heading into the next election campaign. We've had, I'm going to just guess, and I might
01:24:36.220not be completely up to speed on this because I'm not directly involved in the candidate
01:24:40.780selection process, but we've had somewhere in the neighbourhood of 50-plus people that
01:24:47.100have applied to become candidates for Maverick. Many of them have gone through a process that
01:24:54.300involves a couple of different questionnaires. The first is a fairly brief one, just so that the
01:25:01.820selection committee can get to know them a little bit. Then, I believe it's a 30-page
01:25:07.980questionnaire goes out to them that involves things like criminal record checks and financial
01:25:16.220information. Obviously, a lot of things that they have to be comfortable that is going to
01:25:21.260be kept confidential, but that needs to be shared with our committee. The party has asked three
01:25:29.580volunteers to sit on our committee. It's chaired by a former Member of Parliament colleague of mine,
01:25:35.420Val Meredith. Her name now is Val Fraser. She's relocated from the lower mainland of British
01:25:41.100Columbia to Calgary, so she lives not far from me here in Calgary. My deputy leader for Maverick
01:25:48.940party as a fellow out of Saskatchewan, a farmer rancher named Alan Kerpan. And he was a former
01:25:56.460colleague as well for two terms in Ottawa. And then he went on to serve a couple of terms with
01:26:02.860Brad Wall as a SAS party MLA in Saskatchewan. And the third member of our candidate selection
01:26:09.340committee is a former colleague, long-serving member of parliament, Leon Benoit from Northern
01:26:15.260in Alberta. The reason why I asked three former colleagues is because between the three of them,
01:26:21.660they have an incredible amount of experience as a politician. And I felt that they would be
01:26:28.520ideally experienced to conduct the process that culminated with interviews with prospective
01:26:35.920candidates, make the candidate, the nominee to be a candidate at least, well aware of what they
01:26:43.800were getting into because unfortunately, Nathan, all too many people really don't understand the
01:26:50.320job of a member of parliament and what it entails, the stresses and pressures it puts on not only
01:26:55.820the individual, but by extension, their spouses and their family, their children. And so who better
01:27:02.220than Val, Alan and Leon to convey that to them and to ask the probing questions to try to ensure
01:27:10.440that they're well-prepared and that they are ideally situated to be a candidate for Maverick.
01:27:19.160So that gives you some idea of the process that we're going through in selection of our candidates.
01:27:25.400We've also, at this point, targeted 40-plus ridings across Western Canada in relation to
01:27:35.080this whole fear of vote splitting. And I can explain that in some detail if you would like,
01:27:41.560but suffice it to say that these are ridings where the Conservatives won by incredibly large margins.
01:27:48.920And so people saying, well, why would you vote Maverick? Because you're going to simply split
01:27:54.920the vote and allow the Liberals to win. Well, we say a couple of things to that. One is that we're
01:27:59.720not running in Central and Eastern Canada. Maverick party is going to be a true Western party. We're
01:28:05.800going to remain a Western party. We're only going to run in Western Canada. So there won't be any
01:28:10.600boat splitting at all, or at least not caused by Maverick in Central and Eastern Canada. So that
01:28:17.080eliminates about 2 thirds of the ridings in Canada. And then where we will be riding in
01:28:22.360Western Canada for this first time around, we're targeting where Conservatives won by, as I say,
01:28:28.280very wide margins, where if you split the vote that the Conservative candidate got in the last
01:28:34.040election or two, straight down the middle, even half and half between a Maverick and a Conservative,
01:28:39.880the people of those constituencies are going to send either a Conservative yet again back to Ottawa,
01:28:45.800or they'll send a Maverick. So there's not going to be any chance of sending a Liberal NDP or Green
01:28:51.400candidate uh and effectively vote splitting as the conservatives are trying to uh suggest uh so
01:29:00.120that's sort of a quick calculation of how we're managing our candidate selection process yeah it
01:29:06.560is and that's uh that's very helpful very helpful with with representation i mean one of the things
01:29:14.100that comes to mind is that selecting a candidate isn't easy and it's not easy because we live in
01:29:21.840a time of extreme political correctness being a new party means new ideas that might sound radical
01:29:29.180it might sound to some people dangerous not to me but but people will will will castigate it that
01:29:35.320way or try to cast aspersions on it that way how how do you find that line between having the guy
01:29:41.120who can authentically represent his local riding
01:29:43.980while still trying to make sure that the party's electable?
01:29:49.340Well, that's an excellent question, Nathan,
01:29:52.180and it's something I think that not only Maverick
01:29:54.120but all parties struggle with when they're selecting their candidates
01:29:57.440and trying to, quote, keep them on message.
01:30:02.540You know, what we're endeavouring to do is to convince our candidates
01:30:06.980and by extension, the public, that we have a huge job ahead of us on either one of our twin track
01:30:15.560approaches. Whether it's to convince the other provinces outside of Western Canada to support
01:30:23.060substantive modernization of the constitution and educate them as to why that's necessary
01:30:30.720for Western Canada and for us to try and build a promising future for future generations of
01:30:42.720Westerners, or whether it's the second approach of laying the foundations of an independent West
01:30:50.100and to start out down that path by electing Maverick members of Parliament to truly represent
01:30:56.040Western Canadian interests. Both of those are huge jobs and I think that most Canadians,
01:31:04.040if they take the time to look at that, they would understand that.
01:31:07.560And so what we're saying, Nathan, and we're trying to make sure our candidates stay on this
01:31:13.480message line and don't get too distracted with other issues, is that we must stay focused on
01:31:21.080those big goals and objectives. Because in order to have any chance of achieving them,
01:31:29.560we have to rally sufficient Westerners to that cause. And we're not going to get there if we
01:31:36.280get mired in, you know, well, what is this new country going to look like? Or, you know, will
01:31:42.120we be a monarchy or a republic? Or all of these other myriad issues that would deal with independence,
01:31:50.440as you're suggesting. So, we must have candidates that commit to the Maverick message and our goals
01:31:59.080and objectives and that will try their best when they're under the stress and pressures of a
01:32:07.080campaign to stay on that message and not be distracted by all of these other issues, no
01:32:12.520matter how important they might be to either a segment of our Western population or the individual
01:32:19.080that's posing the question. I'm not suggesting for a minute that all of us don't have issues
01:32:25.380that are near and dear to our hearts. And we're getting this a lot in the last two weeks since
01:32:29.740we released our draft policies. Of course, people are coming forward and saying, well,
01:32:34.660what about this or that or the next thing that's not in your policies? And so what we're trying to
01:32:39.580say, Nathan, is, you know, look, I mean, A, this party's in its infancy. B, we developed this
01:32:46.600policy platform to try and give an overall view of where we're headed and what we stand for
01:32:53.600and if you're going to vote for maverick what that means to you and should mean to you
01:32:58.100and you know that we're trying our best to stay on message and keep our representatives on message
01:33:06.360staying on message is always uh it's always a difficult task a couple of different ways
01:33:13.620maybe something that needs to kind of be sussed out a little bit more is is again the reaction
01:33:19.200of the media because so much of electoral politics is media we are happy of course to
01:33:23.740have you here i'm very happy to be on the western standard and to have this platform to be speaking
01:33:28.720to people like yourself and other people who may not get as nice of a hearing elsewhere or
01:33:33.340be outright canceled by other uh platforms and other uh companies what what has it been like
01:33:39.560in the media have you been able to kind of give your message or have they been interpreting it
01:33:43.480mainstream media? Has it been interpreting it wrongly? Well, I would say that the so-called
01:33:50.860mainstream media, especially in connection with what we commonly view as national media,
01:33:57.240has been fair in their reporting when we have had the opportunity to present our message,
01:34:06.040whether it's myself or anybody else speaking on behalf of Maverick. You know, I can't complain
01:34:11.800that they have tried to, you know, disguise our message or attack us unfairly or anything like
01:34:20.580that. I think the biggest problem that we've had is gaining a level of credibility whereby the
01:34:28.920media will actually start paying some attention to us. With the exception of Western Standard and
01:34:35.260some of the newspapers and television and radio in Western Canada, we've had very little success
01:34:44.220in penetrating what you would call the mainstream media out of Toronto and Ottawa. It is coming.
01:34:51.100We've had some recent successes where we've had some good stories with Central Canadian media.
01:34:58.940I suppose to some extent, it's not unusual that they choose to ignore us by and large
01:35:04.540because we're new, we're an upstart and we're easily labelled as a fringe party as we've tried
01:35:11.180to get this going because we don't have a large membership base and we're just starting to nominate
01:35:17.900candidates. So, it's easy for them, as I say, to ignore. We're not running in Central and Eastern
01:35:24.780Canada, so we've eliminated two-thirds of the ridings in the countries by making that our choice.
01:35:30.060but I think the direct answer to your question is that I would have to say that from my experience
01:35:39.260as a longtime politician that all the media that have interviewed me have been actually very fair
01:35:48.800and just asked upfront questions about the party and I've certainly appreciated that and I think
01:35:55.380all of our supporters and members have have appreciated that fact that they've given us
01:35:59.880sort of a a a clean microphone if you will to get our message out well that's fair that's fair
01:36:09.040i'm glad to hear that i mean at a fundamental level we've had serious constitutional questions
01:36:13.840in this country for a long time and it makes no sense that anybody should get panned for that
01:36:19.300i know that there were times where particularly in quebec the reform movement got some short shrift
01:36:24.540by various reporters uh i've heard stories of that but i'm glad that this time around at least
01:36:30.840at least so far some respect is being paid and the democratic ethic is being honored
01:36:36.000with with respect to that then the the democratic ethic what what is your hope then with with the
01:36:43.940upcoming election if it is going to be a covet election and there's going to be a new sort of
01:36:48.660system to ensure that that people have social distancing and everything else how how does one
01:36:53.620campaign when you can't even get door to door or maybe you can I'm not sure what that's all about
01:37:00.500well those are those questions um Nathan I think that from what I've heard from some of our
01:37:08.680supporters that are actually door knocking as we speak uh you know they are there are ways to do
01:37:14.640it and do it safely um obviously out of respect for the homeowners uh the folks that are doing
01:37:21.120this for Maverick are wearing masks. Even if they don't personally believe that a mask accomplishes
01:37:28.400a lot, they wear a mask out of respect for the folks that are going to answer the door.
01:37:36.560When the person comes to the door, the person doing the door knocking takes a step back,
01:37:40.960perhaps steps down a couple steps off of the porch, and has some social distance as they
01:37:46.880have a conversation about what is this maverick all about. I think that there are ways in which,
01:37:54.800even under a COVID-type restrictions, that we could have at least partially a normal,
01:38:04.640if I can call it that, election campaign when it comes to door knocking at least.
01:38:08.560Where the difficulty is, of course, is the restrictions. If they were under our current
01:38:13.200conditions, we wouldn't be allowed to hold meetings and rallies of any size. That would be
01:38:20.800quite different, especially for the leaders' tours where we're accustomed to seeing these large
01:38:28.160rallies where a leader will fly into a certain city and it's all pre-orchestrated. Maybe that's
01:38:35.040a good thing that we wouldn't be allowed to hold those things and get back to the most basic types
01:38:41.440of campaigns where people would have to carry the message more one-on-one sort of eyeball to eyeball
01:38:51.360rather than these large orchestrated PR events that we're used to in the past. I don't know,
01:38:59.760we'll have to see. As I say, part of the problem for the Prime Minister if he wants to call an
01:39:05.360early election is that Elections Canada doesn't have the flexibility, this is my understanding at
01:39:10.800least, the legal flexibility to bring in some of the changes, for example, to have much more
01:39:18.080of the electorate make use of mail-in ballots. I know one of the things that apparently is in
01:39:26.200this bill that the Liberals have put before Parliament is to have a three-day voting time
01:39:33.500period as opposed to traditionally, we just have the one day with a few advanced polling days.
01:39:40.800So they need some flexibility, they being Elections Canada, to hold an election under these types of conditions that will still allow the vast majority of Canadians the right to exercise their democratic right and cast a ballot.
01:39:57.860So we'll have to see how that unfolds. I don't think that anybody would think that it's not going to be quite different if it's held before sufficient people get vaccinated, and hopefully we can put this virus business behind us, or at least get it down to where it's more like an annual flu shot, which, of course, I think everyone, no matter which side of the debate they're on, would agree with that that's the ultimate goal.
01:40:23.880yeah it's i'm just thinking of all that i mean there was a lot of things that came out of
01:40:32.220the most recent american election that came to mail-in voting i don't want to entertain any of
01:40:41.100that here relitigated it's a lot to get into but nonetheless if there is one thing to say
01:40:47.740about america versus canada and this is something that's not understood very well by canadian
01:40:52.960electors is that in america you can pretty much vote by a bingo card carrier pigeon or a one-armed
01:40:59.840bandit it looks that diverse there are punch cards there are trailing hanging chads as it were and of
01:41:06.420course the uh there's digital voting as well you can press buttons on a screen for digital voting
01:41:11.120because their ballots are much larger than ours but nonetheless the mail-in voting question in
01:41:16.060the united states was quite controversial and remains quite controversial in canada i think
01:41:21.620I think it'll have more integrity but even so with those kind of doubts swarming around if an
01:41:27.360election is held in the fall I can tell you that I personally will find a way to vote in person
01:41:31.600that's that's very important to me and I would encourage everyone else to do the same as far
01:41:36.280as they are able when when we're going into this question of the election itself of course the
01:41:41.280writ's going to have to be dropped by somebody who isn't the governor general because of course
01:41:44.600we don't have one anymore when we're getting another one I'm not sure but we don't have one
01:41:49.880right now so apparently it's going to be the chief justice or the former chief justice perhaps
01:41:53.940beverly mclaughlin herself that would be interesting but but as we kind of move into
01:41:59.240this new new mode of canada we've had the pandemic for a while debt is climbing the questions of
01:42:05.280separation and sovereignty yes they are important to many people but a lot of them also are taking
01:42:09.760a bit of a back seat it's the question of the economy what is the maverick answer to what are
01:42:14.880we going to do with all this debt and how are we going to get out of the covid the covid crunch
01:42:19.420that we're feeling? Well, I think that it's obvious to most Western Canadians that have
01:42:26.720some modicum of common sense that we cannot continue to go the way we are. I made one of
01:42:33.460my leaders' video shortly after the budget came out to express my concern on behalf of my
01:42:40.660grandchildren about this horrendous accumulation of debt. If the numbers are to be believed and
01:42:50.100we have to question them, that we're headed to $1.4 trillion of debt. And the biggest concern
01:42:59.240over and above the amount of money that's been shoveled out the door by Mr. Trudeau and his
01:43:05.420government is the unaccountability of it. I mean, it's just, there's a story almost every week
01:43:11.240about how they cannot account for billions upon billions of dollars. And that is extremely
01:43:19.240worrisome for me, Nathan, as someone that really has been proud to describe myself as a fiscal
01:43:28.060conservative. Indeed, when I left the farm in the mid-80s to run for the Reform Party,
01:43:34.540it was largely out of concern of the runaway debt at the time. I was quite proud to be part
01:43:41.900of the Reform Party in that initial tranche of 52 reformers elected in 1993 that put pressure