Western Standard - March 11, 2023


OPINION CHECK: Confusion at the swimming pools


Episode Stats

Length

28 minutes

Words per Minute

137.6723

Word Count

3,902

Sentence Count

109

Misogynist Sentences

23

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Trans women with male genitals should not be allowed in the same change room as women and their children, argues Alison Pajovic, a constitutional lawyer with the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) in Calgary, Alberta.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Good day. We live in confusing times. Men who identify as women are starting to invade women's 1.00
00:00:17.420 spaces. They're competing in women's sports. They read to children in drag, and now they are moving
00:00:24.960 in to women's changing rooms at swimming pools. What is going on? To try and make some sense of
00:00:34.460 this, we are pleased to welcome here today Alison Pajovic, a constitutional lawyer working with
00:00:45.500 the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms. Ms. Pajovic specializes in constitutional and
00:00:53.320 human rights issues. Welcome to the Western Standard, Ms. Pujovic. Thank you very much for
00:01:00.340 having me today. You are very welcome. Ms. Pujovic, I think the issue here is the use of bathrooms,
00:01:07.180 not the legitimacy of trans people themselves, each to their own, right? Absolutely. The issue
00:01:15.040 here that we've been hearing about in the media and parents complaining is that there are some
00:01:22.020 trans women entering women's bathrooms who have not completed gender reassignment surgery,
00:01:28.420 so they still have male anatomy. The issue isn't whether they should be treated as women, 0.96
00:01:34.260 whether they should be treated differently, but rather it's the effect on women and children 0.99
00:01:42.100 when they're being exposed to trans women's male anatomy in a changing room. And these are spaces 0.63
00:01:48.020 that have previously been reserved for individuals with female anatomy, 1.00
00:01:53.340 and that is what women and female children expect 1.00
00:01:56.280 when they go into a female changing room. 0.98
00:01:59.320 And this, of course, has been the case for thousands of years.
00:02:02.880 Nobody has disputed the fact that there are men and there are women,
00:02:06.620 and for some purposes, they need their own space.
00:02:11.200 Now we're finding that the law doesn't see it that way.
00:02:15.040 Not in Canada. Anyway, what has changed?
00:02:17.920 Well, if you take a look at Section 4 of the Alberta Human Rights Act, as of 2017, I believe
00:02:24.240 is when it was last amended, it now protects gender identity and gender expression. So,
00:02:30.960 you can't discriminate or deny a person or class of persons accommodation or access to a facility
00:02:39.920 because of a variety of individual characteristics such as race, color, gender, age, and now
00:02:50.080 gender identity and gender expression are included in that section of the Human Rights Act.
00:02:54.880 So the human rights legislation protects the rights of trans women to access the pool,
00:03:01.280 but in my professional opinion there is a gray area here because municipal pools,
00:03:07.600 in my view, could bar trans women with male genitals from using the same change room as women 0.94
00:03:14.660 and their children. So why do you say that? Yeah, I say that because of section 11 of the Alberta
00:03:20.140 Human Rights Act, and that provides a defense clause to a potential claim for discrimination.
00:03:26.940 If a trans woman with male genitals complained, I can't access the women's changing room,
00:03:32.720 that's discriminatory while the municipality such as the city of Calgary
00:03:37.820 could have an argument using section 11 of the Alberta Human Rights Act which
00:03:43.580 basically says that there hasn't been a contravention of the Act if there are
00:03:50.840 reasonable and justifiable circumstances and in my legal opinion it is
00:03:55.940 reasonable and justifiable to exclude anyone with male genitals from changing 1.00
00:04:05.340 in a space that has historically been only for women to protect the comfort 1.00
00:04:13.020 and emotional mental well-being of vulnerable female children and women and
00:04:18.920 some women are victims of sexual assault so seeing male anatomy can be
00:04:24.680 triggering for them. So this is a live issue, but I do believe that there is room in the Alberta
00:04:31.540 human rights legislation for city pools to say no. I'm sorry, we're recognizing that you are 0.95
00:04:39.580 entitled to your own space to change, but unfortunately, if you haven't physically
00:04:46.040 transitioned into that you don't have female anatomy at the moment, you're not allowed to 1.00
00:04:53.480 change in that space. You know, Ms. Pujovic, speaking as an unreconstructed product of the
00:04:58.760 19th century, it does seem to me to be a peculiar thing that we should even be having this discussion.
00:05:05.440 I'm looking at the legislation that you have provided here, and to me, no wonder people
00:05:13.860 are confused about this. Everything we thought we knew six months ago, a few years ago, has
00:05:20.360 been turned upside down. So, let me ask you, what happened? Why are we having to deal with this?
00:05:27.120 Well, over the years, there has been an evolution in our society. Society is constantly progressing,
00:05:33.500 and we've progressed to the point where there is continuing and ongoing and evolving recognition
00:05:38.940 for marginalized groups in society. I guess that's a good thing. Absolutely, absolutely, and the law
00:05:44.800 has kept up with that the supreme court of canada you know continues to be open to recognizing
00:05:51.360 analogous grounds of discrimination and so you know in in recent times we've recognized as a
00:05:58.960 society that the trans people trans individuals are groups that are being discriminated against
00:06:05.680 and so the law has responded the courts have responded and we're seeing greater protections
00:06:11.200 for that group just as we have for other groups in the past such as different racial minorities
00:06:17.040 people with disabilities and now it's uh it's trans the trans community i see i i mean i i hear
00:06:24.160 what you say but i also have the conversations of people who read what we put out in the western
00:06:29.440 standard and i have to ask you this in a very a very direct way does the law actually allow
00:06:37.760 Now, trans people who are not fully transgendered to use washrooms of the sex they identify with. 0.51
00:06:45.080 People just can't wrap their heads around that.
00:06:47.000 It just seems like the decent thing to do is not to do that.
00:06:51.640 In other words, a biological male gets undressed in a woman's changing room only a few years ago. 0.92
00:06:59.000 That was unthinkable.
00:07:01.160 And is it really legal now?
00:07:03.540 As I mentioned earlier, it's that human rights legislation, and I believe from reading an article from your news organization, that a parent complained about their child witnessing an individual with male anatomy walking around the women's changing room.
00:07:24.680 and I read that the city of Calgary responded and said well we can't do
00:07:28.800 anything because you know there's human rights legislation protecting that
00:07:32.420 person and giving that person the right to change in that bathroom but as I've
00:07:36.080 said there is a defense clause and so if a complaint was made to the city or
00:07:43.620 another municipality about this I do believe there is an argument that a
00:07:48.020 human rights tribunal could consider and I think it would be successful that it
00:07:52.440 reasonable and justifiable to exclude somebody with male genitals from using 0.99
00:07:58.200 the change room to protect the most vulnerable in our society who are our
00:08:02.760 children. So the common sense solutions seem to just use a use one of the washroom
00:08:12.120 stalls or use I guess most most facilities these days have family
00:08:19.920 changing room a private space so the person the trans person could use one of those private spaces
00:08:27.440 and not intrude on the experience of the of the of the changing room that anybody else has
00:08:35.440 is that a solution absolutely i i think that there has to be a safe space for vulnerable female 0.98
00:08:43.840 children and women who want to go to access these public facilities and are not expecting to see
00:08:52.080 somebody with with male anatomy and it's not about hating a trans person whatsoever it you know you
00:08:59.840 can you can identify as a female but if you still have male anatomy that's going to have that could 1.00
00:09:06.080 have an effect and we know it has an effect on some vulnerable people we know that there was a
00:09:12.080 a teenage girl recently who complained um i read about it on your news organization that she was
00:09:18.320 glad you're reading the western standard that's right she was traumatized when she was changing
00:09:23.120 in a calgary changing room at a pool and there was a trans woman walking around 0.79
00:09:32.160 fully nude and she was traumatized by that so this is definitely an issue that needs to be resolved
00:09:38.800 and unfortunately where the law has done a good job of protecting minorities
00:09:45.040 such as trans people it has not taken into account the effect on vulnerable
00:09:52.860 citizens such as young female children or young women in these facilities and
00:09:59.500 so there's competing interests here absolutely there's competing rights and
00:10:04.080 and the law is only at the moment
00:10:05.920 protecting the rights of trans people.
00:10:08.360 So, this is the theoretical background,
00:10:12.160 but here's the confusion that I hear over the phone,
00:10:15.460 I get in a letter to the editors.
00:10:18.500 Let's say you're a mother who encounters this situation.
00:10:24.300 You're in the changing room, you have your daughter with you,
00:10:27.940 and there's a person in there with a male anatomy 0.91
00:10:31.300 Walking around, at any rate, undressing, it's beyond awkward.
00:10:38.200 So here's the confusion.
00:10:39.240 You ask the person to leave, but that person refuses.
00:10:42.780 Say, I'm trans, I have a legal right to be here.
00:10:45.980 We've already established that there is a legal right.
00:10:48.860 What can you do?
00:10:50.540 What are your options?
00:10:52.100 Can you call the police?
00:10:54.880 Apparently there's no crime being committed.
00:10:56.580 Well, I know that there have been calls to police about this happening in Calgary,
00:11:04.260 and to my knowledge, the police have not charged anybody right now, and if you look at the
00:11:10.820 offense of indecent exposure, which you might think that this might fall into that category,
00:11:19.140 indecent exposure requires exposing oneself for a sexual purpose, and merely changing in
00:11:25.780 a changing room that you are otherwise lawfully allowed to access in my view would not be
00:11:33.060 construed as being an act to an act for a sexual purpose so you know unless somebody whether it was
00:11:42.740 someone of any sexual orientation was was doing something lewd in a changing room
00:11:47.940 you really don't violate that provision here and my guess is that's why the police haven't
00:11:54.820 made any charges yet because if you're just changing in the changing room and you're allowed
00:11:58.900 to be there that doesn't breach the provisions of the criminal code but i i just want to reference
00:12:05.220 a 2019 case out of bc where a trans woman named jessica yaniv made human rights complaints against
00:12:15.060 various owners of waxing salons because Yaniv wanted the owners of the salons to wax her
00:12:30.000 male body parts, and the women of multiple salons refused to do so, and the BC Human 0.73
00:12:37.880 Rights Tribunal dismissed Yaniv's complaints against the salons and the salon owners and
00:12:44.220 found, and I quote, a scrotum is different than a vulva, regardless of the gender of the person
00:12:51.180 it is attached to. The tribunal also took into account the testimonies of various salon owners
00:12:57.520 that they did not feel comfortable waxing Yaniv's male anatomy, and also found that there's an
00:13:04.700 element of consent. There would have to be consent by the owners to wax anatomy that is different
00:13:12.460 from what they advertise for which is female anatomy so again I want to stress here it's very 0.97
00:13:20.020 important that we're not talking about hating on anybody what we're talking about is the fact
00:13:28.720 that unless there has been a physical gender reassignment surgery someone in the female
00:13:36.720 changing room young women and children are going to see male anatomy in these situations
00:13:42.200 and they don't understand that this trans woman identifies as female,
00:13:48.980 all they know is what they see.
00:13:51.300 And that is having an effect on women and children 0.85
00:13:55.240 because they've been making complaints
00:13:56.700 and we hear about that kind of thing through the work that we do.
00:14:00.740 So this is an issue and there are conflicting rights here
00:14:04.280 and it's a very significant problem.
00:14:06.640 Do you take some encouragement for positive change
00:14:09.640 from the outcome of the Aniv case?
00:14:12.200 Well, yes, I mean, it's a recognition that there has to be a line drawn, and we have
00:14:21.760 to respect the rights of minorities, including trans women, absolutely, but there are differences
00:14:31.520 in anatomy, unless someone has had surgery, that the tribunal has recognized, and that
00:14:38.440 That is a factor, and there's a reason, and the tribunal found this is a reasonable reason 0.97
00:14:45.440 for refusing that service, is that the anatomy is different.
00:14:49.420 And so, I can see that being somewhat analogous to a situation like this if it ever got into
00:14:56.320 a tribunal complaint situation, or if it ever got to court, because there are competing
00:15:01.220 rights here, and unfortunately, the rights of children are not being looked after at
00:15:06.300 this time.
00:15:07.300 So, yes, what I'm hearing you saying is if you're actually in this situation, there's not an awful lot you can do.
00:15:13.140 But if you want to work for change, what are your options?
00:15:17.640 Well, what I would tell parents at this point, I would tell them about the human rights legislation,
00:15:23.780 which protects trans women's rights to access that changing room. 0.98
00:15:30.060 but you know parents are free to make a complaint to the city of calgary or whatever municipality
00:15:37.980 there they live in um if if enough people come together and explain i don't know that it needs
00:15:45.020 to be explained but you know write a letter make a phone call talk to your mla uh you know talk to
00:15:52.460 the city about how this is affecting their children how this is affecting them they
00:15:59.180 want to have a space where they can change where they're not going to be witnessing and exposed to
00:16:10.460 anatomy of a male and that that unfortunately we're faced with these conflicts so the city
00:16:18.860 of calgary owns the swimming pools and the changing rooms that go with them at the provincial level is
00:16:25.580 Is there, the province owns the Alberta Human Rights Act, is there a way of changing that?
00:16:32.420 Absolutely, it could be amended and what I would like to see, just so that everybody's
00:16:38.460 rights are respected, is the recognizing that there are protections for gender expression
00:16:47.240 and gender identity, but also including a provision in there that there have to be safe
00:16:53.280 spaces for women and children to change in these kind of situations where they are changing 0.99
00:17:04.820 with other people with the same anatomy, and they're not going to be exposed to male anatomy.
00:17:12.260 And that is something that is absent in the law right now, and it's something that we
00:17:15.960 very much like to see changed.
00:17:17.520 Ms. Podjovic, I can't believe I'm saying this, but what about a human rights challenge?
00:17:22.040 I'm not sure. The problem with the human rights legislation, it wasn't drafted with
00:17:34.040 these situations in mind years ago. What it does is it protects someone from being denied
00:17:41.420 access to a service. So in this situation, a mother who wants to protect her child is
00:17:47.860 not being denied access to a female changing room and the law right now doesn't protect 1.00
00:17:54.340 her right to be in there and exclude somebody with male anatomy it just doesn't cover that situation 1.00
00:18:02.420 so um i think that a case could be made that she and her child are being discriminated against on
00:18:10.980 the basis of sex i don't know what the human rights tribunal will do with that that is a
00:18:15.780 a new situation but I'm not saying there's no chance but I'm not sure how
00:18:21.420 strong of a case it would be but it'd be worth looking into and also there could
00:18:26.700 be a charter rights to under section 7 if this situation could engage section
00:18:34.980 7 which is a right to security of the person and a you know a parent could
00:18:41.260 argue that my child's security of the person right is being infringed by being exposed
00:18:48.840 in this government facility to someone who has male anatomy and they want to protect 0.76
00:18:57.300 that child from that. So, I'm not sure how strong that would be, but it's definitely
00:19:03.700 worth looking into.
00:19:04.700 Well, for sure. I'd be a brave guy if I tried to guess what the Human Rights Commission
00:19:11.060 would do on any given issue but i'm interested to hear you say
00:19:14.820 there could even be a an argument there that would be listened to so
00:19:18.900 that's you looked at the law side of this we've looked at the situation at
00:19:22.980 the swimming pool um what are then there's simply the
00:19:28.580 matter of protesting uh this is wrong you say i don't know
00:19:33.220 this shouldn't be going on and yet we have a bylaw apparently which
00:19:38.500 if you do that you're considered hateful so can you talk to us um what advice do you have for
00:19:46.100 people who just plain want to have their say on this protest well peaceful protest is protected
00:19:52.740 by the canadian constitution specifically in the charter of rights and freedoms
00:19:57.860 the canadian constitution is the highest law on the land and in my view the calgary bylaw which
00:20:04.740 it looking to rebrand freedom of expression as harassment or freedom of
00:20:13.620 speech as harassment in my view that's unconstitutional and a violation of the
00:20:17.920 Charter of Rights and Freedoms because for as long as the Charter has been
00:20:22.440 around people are allowed to stand in public places holding signs, chanting,
00:20:28.740 making themselves heard, protests are a part of a stable and functioning
00:20:35.980 democracy, what you can't do is be hateful with your speech and that is
00:20:42.420 already a criminal code offense. So what it looks like the city of Calgary is
00:20:49.420 trying to do here is to, you know, make something penalize protesters when the
00:20:57.680 criminal code already protects against hate speech so in our view they don't
00:21:06.500 have city of Calgary doesn't have the jurisdiction to do that that is
00:21:09.860 something that the federal government has already done and it's a high bar to
00:21:16.680 inciting hatred with speech and the criminal code basically says you cannot
00:21:23.540 incite hatred which would which could lead to violence against a specific group and so
00:21:30.100 i would say as long as you're you know protesting respectfully in every case against whatever you
00:21:37.700 want to say about anything in society you have to be respectful and you can't make comments
00:21:44.820 that could incite other people to violence that's that actually puts in puts us in mind of an
00:21:52.420 incident recently where somebody actually went into a private event and I think it was a drag
00:21:59.780 queen story hour I got I'm pretty sure that's what that's what it was at a public library
00:22:06.500 um is that acceptable
00:22:11.860 well again um it's a private event if it's a private event somebody can be charged with
00:22:19.380 trespassing. If you stay in a public space, you are absolutely legally entitled to protest.
00:22:25.300 That right is, as I've said, is protected by the Constitution, and no bylaw can override that,
00:22:30.420 as long as you're not inciting violence through hate speech. I see. Okay. So then, really,
00:22:41.860 we have to… Is it going to take a challenge to that city bylaw, do you think?
00:22:48.420 Yes, yes. I mean, you can be charged under, you can be given a ticket under this bylaw,
00:22:56.660 but in my view, that bylaw will not survive a constitutional challenge. So I hope to see
00:23:03.780 that happen in the future because we need to protect the freedom of expression and freedom
00:23:08.420 of speech in Canada. It's very important. Okay. So what we have here is a complex situation
00:23:14.820 And really, we're looking for a way that people of goodwill, and that may not include everybody,
00:23:25.260 but people who actually want to get along together can get along together.
00:23:34.660 What's the path forward for people who just want to make this work?
00:23:38.400 Well, I would suggest in order to respect and protect the rights of everyone here is
00:23:47.020 that trans women are not forced to change in the male bathroom, but that they be given
00:23:56.840 their own private space to change to protect the interests and rights of vulnerable female 0.99
00:24:04.120 children and women so that they can also have a space where they're not being exposed to 0.80
00:24:11.380 male anatomy in a space that they previously felt safe.
00:24:16.220 So can we go on like this?
00:24:21.640 Absolutely not.
00:24:22.640 I fear just from reading the stories and the comments and hearing from parents, some parents
00:24:29.620 are very angry and very protective of their children.
00:24:33.440 they don't it doesn't matter to them how somebody identifies when what they're
00:24:41.120 looking at is what you can see in a changing room so I see this as a real
00:24:47.000 problem because we certainly don't want any hatred towards the trans community
00:24:51.200 so the best result in my view is to have a separate space for that trans person
00:24:58.400 who does not has not undergone the gender reassignment surgery to change so that
00:25:02.900 there's no conflict with anyone. And as I've said before repeatedly, we have to remember the most
00:25:08.620 vulnerable group in our society is children. And specifically in this particular circumstance,
00:25:14.820 it's young female children, and their interest must be protected. 1.00
00:25:20.360 Certainly you can see the possibility of conflict in this situation.
00:25:24.280 Yes. Yes. I'm afraid of what might happen if this doesn't get resolved.
00:25:28.800 okay so there it is ladies and gentlemen the law has been changed this does not make the law right
00:25:41.760 but laws can be changed practices can be changed and some need to be there is a way to do it
00:25:51.680 parents and children have rights and in our hurry to accommodate a minority
00:25:58.800 Which is not necessarily a bad thing, but nevertheless, in our haste to accommodate a minority, we have an obligation, in my view, not to trample upon the rights of a majority.
00:26:15.700 People who care about this need to go to work on it, and there's a right way to do it.
00:26:22.600 Ms. Pujovic, all your career, I am aware of some of it, all your career you have been
00:26:31.820 a fighter for what's right.
00:26:34.140 Thank you for being here today and giving us your wisdom.
00:26:39.100 God bless you.
00:26:41.900 Thank you Mr. Hanford for having me.
00:26:44.380 It's been a pleasure.
00:26:45.380 For the Western Standard, I'm Nigel Hanford.
00:26:48.920 The current Lethbridge feed grain prices are as follows.
00:26:51.360 barley remains at 417 feed wheat is unchanged at 430 while corn is sideways at 424. over to the
00:26:59.120 milling wheat markets may minneapolis futures added three and a half cents at 827 per bushel
00:27:04.640 with local hard red spring bid for april movement at 1085 per bushel delivered
00:27:09.760 looking at the oil seeds nearby canola futures tanked 24.80 at 767.50 per ton with delivered
00:27:17.440 values for april movement at 16.95 per bushel in the pulse markets nearby red lentils are unchanged
00:27:24.160 at 33 cents a pound and yellow peas are trading at 12.50 per bushel and in the cattle markets
00:27:30.400 april live cattle dip 30 cents at 164.50 per hundred weight for more information on pricing
00:27:36.960 and picked up on farm options give me a call at 403 394 1711 i'm vera busiak at marketplace
00:27:44.800 commodities accurate real-time marketing information and pricing options canadian
00:27:51.280 shooting sports association without the cssa our gun rights would have been taken long long ago 0.99
00:27:57.360 these guys are on the front lines helping to draft smart and intelligent firearms regulations and
00:28:03.600 legislation in canada and more importantly educating the public about how we keep guns
00:28:08.720 out of the hands of the wrong people to become a member it's absolutely worth every penny
00:28:15.600 you can become a western center member for just ten dollars a month or 99 a year for unlimited