Western Standard - October 21, 2022


Question Period with Premier Danielle Smith

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
Cory celebrates BC's electoral move to the right AHS is to blame for our problems

Episode Stats


Length

58 minutes

Words per minute

193.99

Word count

11,264

Sentence count

261

Harmful content

Misogyny

8

sentences flagged

Toxicity

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of the Western Standard's Question Period, Premier Daniel Smith is joined by Publisher Derek Fildebrandt and Editor-in-Chief Mike Downey to answer your questions about Alberta's new premier, Danielle Smith.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Transcription by CastingWords
00:00:30.000 Thank you.
00:01:00.000 Good day, I'm Derek Fildebrandt, publisher of the Western Standard, and welcome to hopefully
00:01:25.840 the first of uh many question periods with alberta premier daniel smith uh joined by alberta's uh
00:01:34.160 newly elected premier daniel smith thank you very much for joining us my pleasure nice to be back
00:01:38.240 on the western standard again it's wonderful to have you um so this is a new program uh this is
00:01:45.120 the first we hope to make this a regular occurrence we'll see how it goes um it's question period for
00:01:51.920 a reason it's uh it's gonna be questions regularly put to alberta premier danielle smith
00:01:56.720 um after today if we're able to do this going forward uh we're going to get a call in line
00:02:01.840 set up so that you can verbally ask your questions of the premier um but today it's going to begin
00:02:08.320 with uh because we don't have that i get to ask more questions than is probably normally the plan
00:02:13.200 uh but i'm going to ask some questions of the premier and uh and when i'm done with those
00:02:17.920 then it's your turn. So in the comments section, post your questions, try to keep them respectful,
00:02:23.360 try to keep them family friendly if you can. Obviously, we're not going to be able to answer
00:02:27.840 every one, but I imagine many of them will be reoccurring. So if we see the same kind of
00:02:31.680 question coming up multiple times, there's a better chance we're going to ask it, but no guarantees
00:02:36.080 because we've only got an hour of the Premier's time here. But we're sitting here at the Enoch
00:02:41.520 Cree Nation Hotel and Casino, just immediately west of Edmonton. We can actually see right out
00:02:47.440 the window here down uh beautiful downtown edmonton uh we're here because uh this weekend
00:02:53.280 is the united conservative party's annual general meeting um it's only been about two weeks and maybe
00:03:00.800 change two weeks and a day i think since you were elected leader of the united conservative party
00:03:04.800 and therefore uh premier designate sworn in just days later but it's been roughly 13 years in the
00:03:12.800 making since you first left the canadian federation of independent businesses and ran
00:03:16.720 for the leadership of this little party very few people had heard of the wild rose 13 years later
00:03:23.040 you're now the premier of alberta um do you have to pinch yourself it it's been remarkable
00:03:30.080 especially since it's been so busy over the last couple of weeks i'm i'm really grateful that
00:03:36.080 albertans forgave me for um the blunder that i had back in in 2014 and in with the best of
00:03:43.280 intentions misreading the signs that people were wanting to bring this movement back together
00:03:47.760 clearly i was wrong but it's it took a long a long time seven years to make amends for that
00:03:55.280 and it was by no means a given that albertans would give me a chance to get back into politics
00:04:00.520 so i'm just grateful that our members did and now we have to broaden it out and i'm reintroducing
00:04:06.040 myself to albertans who might not have listened to me on my radio program for the last six years
00:04:10.280 But I'm feeling really encouraged by the feedback I've already gotten from our caucus.
00:04:16.040 We're coming together as a team, and it's fantastic.
00:04:19.000 We've got a unity in purpose, and I'm looking forward to moving forward in a bold way on a lot of different files.
00:04:26.420 So we're going to get to the cabinet in a second, which was announced just minutes ago.
00:04:29.860 But you've got – it's been less than two weeks since you were sworn in.
00:04:36.500 It's an unusual transition, I would say.
00:04:40.280 normally someone becomes leader or a new party wins an election over another party and there's
00:04:47.160 two or three weeks and the premier or the prime minister and the cabinet are sworn in at the same
00:04:52.200 time you were sworn in days after winning the leadership but not your cabinet now about 10-15
00:05:03.560 minutes ago your cabinet was announced but will not be sworn in until monday um so it's it's a
00:05:10.380 different kind of transition uh what you tell me what are the big challenges you faced in the
00:05:15.140 transition coming into the premier's office so quickly and obviously a lot of uh slings and 1.00
00:05:20.360 arrows shot your way from day one it's there's been a few challenges i think one was that coming
00:05:27.040 into this weekend for the agm there was a big discussion normally when you announce your
00:05:31.560 cabinet, you also swear them in on the same day. And we wanted to make sure that our members could
00:05:37.480 be introduced to our new cabinet, because this is going to be our election cabinet. When you think
00:05:42.000 about it, we're not getting together as a group again until next year. And so I wanted, I thought
00:05:47.340 it was respectful to our members so that they knew which direction we were going, what the faces were
00:05:52.720 going to be in each portfolio. So it is a bit awkward because there are unfortunately not room
00:05:58.980 for every cabinet member. But one of the things I would say, and it was one of the cabinet members
00:06:03.360 who I was unfortunately not able to offer a position to, and they said, you know what,
00:06:08.400 this is good. We need to have some new fresh faces in there so that we can put a new face
00:06:13.500 on the government. So I was grateful to even though somebody was disappointed at not being
00:06:17.980 able to be in that position, that they were so gracious. And that's what I've seen across all
00:06:23.800 of the meetings that I've had with our MLAs, I wanted to make sure that I didn't prejudge anything
00:06:29.780 because when leadership races are a little bit rough, you probably know that too, Derek. And
00:06:34.960 when you have the kind of challenge that happens and the frictions that happen, you need to do a
00:06:40.960 little bit of relationship repair. And so I wanted to make sure that I sat down for at least half an
00:06:46.120 hour with every MLA, wanted to find out what priorities were in their riding, what their
00:06:50.360 aspirations were in politics and then we had a fantastic three-day caucus meeting where i wanted
00:06:56.840 to do a couple of things in setting the tone for how we were going to come together as a group bring
00:07:02.120 family members out have a little bit of social time together we played paintball and i discovered
00:07:07.080 them actually a pretty good shot nate horner discovered that the hard way as well that was
00:07:10.680 probably one of my my best moments in capture the flag but it was it's it's important when you do
00:07:16.760 those kinds of things together it brings you together as a team so those were those were the
00:07:20.840 other considerations as we had to to bring together the um the caucus members and also
00:07:27.400 we have had some just stellar leadership candidates and i wanted to make room for as many of them as
00:07:31.880 possible in senior roles so that was the the other thing that i had to consider as we were putting
00:07:36.680 it together so let's talk about cabinet cabinet as i said was just announced minutes before we
00:07:42.120 started um there's a lot to take in um as there's with any new cabinet because it's not just a
00:07:48.440 shuffle the new cabinet but not exactly i i was trying to think you know what would be the column
00:07:54.120 of uh headline of my column i write about this i was thinking uh something new something new
00:07:58.600 something borrowed and something blue so let's start with the new uh brian gene uh minister of
00:08:04.680 jobs economy northern development peter guthrie and energy mike ellis in the new position of public
00:08:09.480 safety minister used uh ariana lagrange staying in education uh travis taves returning to finance
00:08:18.600 rajansani going to multiculturalism i should say it's a bigger rule it's trade immigration
00:08:24.360 and multiculturalism oh okay yes yes um multiculturalism gets attached to a lot
00:08:29.400 of different ministries and every different premiership uh borrowed um uh tyler shandro
00:08:36.840 stays in justice not returning to health though but staying in justice um minister copying staying
00:08:42.680 in health and something blue so that's where i put todd lowland uh you've got his minister of
00:08:49.480 forestry parks and tourism uh i think you should call the parks and recreation because he could be
00:08:54.280 like the ron swanson i have to tell you i when i was talking to him about it i i wanted him to look
00:08:59.400 up a picture because i was sure if i called it forestry parks and recreation which we were going
00:09:03.080 to someone would have put one of the ron swanson mustaches on him i don't know if he's a parks and
00:09:09.080 rec fan though if he's not he's he's got to study up quickly because that'd be the dream job as
00:09:13.960 minister to sit there and say my job is to make sure we do nothing the only problem with that is
00:09:19.000 that there's so much i want him to do in that portfolio we can talk about there's a i have a
00:09:23.000 hundred things i could say about each of those so tell me which one you want to get okay so there's
00:09:26.280 a lot of specifics i want to this question is less about the specifics of those individual ministers
00:09:30.920 I'm going to get to that. It's a change. It's a significant change, but it's not a massive
00:09:36.020 turnover that you would sometimes see, obviously not, within an intra-party change, with new
00:09:41.340 leadership within a party staying government. What's the big message you're trying to send
00:09:46.440 with this cabinet that has significant differences, but is not a radical overhaul from the outgoing
00:09:53.660 entrepreneurship? I think, especially in a couple of different roles, with Travis Taves being in
00:09:59.960 finance and treasury board again. I wanted to just express my confidence in him in that role. He
00:10:06.360 very clearly has won the esteem of Albertans and members of our party. And I wanted to
00:10:12.640 acknowledge that. I mean, it was a really close leadership race. And I think that the fact that
00:10:17.840 people were trying to, were struggling to make a choice between he and I in the end in that final
00:10:22.340 ballot shows that they want him in a senior role. And he's got some unfinished business to do,
00:10:27.340 even though he was out of the portfolio while he ran for this for a short time for the leadership,
00:10:33.020 there are some really big files that he wants to move on. I found it really interesting during
00:10:39.280 the campaign that he kept on saying that the Alberta pension plan is one of the areas that
00:10:45.980 he was most enthusiastic about looking at. And so I want to see what he can do on that file.
00:10:51.460 I want him to release the report and review that we have done on that. And I want to see what his
00:10:57.060 recommendations are. And I think he needs to move that file. So it's a couple of things. It's not
00:11:01.180 only stability, but it's also boldness. And I think he embodies both of that.
00:11:05.960 With the other leadership candidates that are in cabinet, clearly Brian Jean has also, he was
00:11:13.620 sort of a jockeying between the three of us as the front runners all the way through the campaign.
00:11:18.800 And once again, I wanted to give him a role that was going to be substantial. I know that he,
00:11:23.680 When you look at our northern territories, it strikes me that we think of the north as a region,
00:11:28.820 but anyone who travels to the north knows that you can't easily get from Grand Prairie to Fort McMurray
00:11:33.260 because we haven't built a darn road.
00:11:35.060 And you also have Cold Lake and Athabasca, which are huge economic drivers for our province
00:11:40.100 and generate a ton of revenue, and yet they don't have the same level of infrastructure support.
00:11:45.560 When you can drive on a road for two hours and not have wireless access,
00:11:50.480 you could even make a cell phone call those are the kind of things that i wanted brian gene to
00:11:54.320 be able to do is to give us an economic strategy that puts the north at its center and works in
00:12:00.480 all of the different infrastructure improvements we we need to make to make sure that the north
00:12:04.160 can truly thrive i do want to talk about some of the specifics of of the ins and outs with this
00:12:09.440 but i i i guess i'll rephrase my question as what's the theme that you're you're trying to
00:12:15.600 to project with this i know um i know i know communications people and they're sitting down
00:12:20.560 they're trying to come out what are the key messages we're trying to portray i think you
00:12:25.120 know one you talked about you know about change but projecting stability you know you get you
00:12:30.800 got to kind of get that with travis taves but what's kind of the overarching message you're
00:12:35.920 trying to send with the appointment of this cabinet it is stability but boldness really and
00:12:40.400 i think it's respect as well the fact that you can have a difference of opinion but you can come
00:12:45.360 together as a team and a family i think that that was really important in me assembling the cabinet
00:12:50.800 the way that i did is that people had some questions about because leadership races get a
00:12:55.360 little bit tense i think they had some questions about whether everybody would be prepared to serve
00:13:00.240 under my leadership and i think that this demonstrates that i respect the the role that
00:13:06.400 each of them played each of the the leadership candidates played in raising bold issues and i
00:13:11.200 I wanted to put them in a position where they had a meaningful role that they could execute on them
00:13:15.360 too. I only ran on a small number of things and so all of the the best ideas came from us as a
00:13:21.200 collective the group of candidates running and so by putting most of those those leadership
00:13:26.320 candidates in senior roles I think that that demonstrates I respect them and they respect me
00:13:30.400 and people are going to be able to see some boldness but also some some of the stability
00:13:34.640 that they've been looking for so um i'm gonna we're gonna talk about who's out in a bit but
00:13:42.160 let's come back to who's in because i know you're eager to talk about who's in here um so obviously
00:13:48.320 uh uh travis taves returning back in i more or less would consider the leadership candidates
00:13:54.560 who are back in it more or less i've never laughed yeah that was a kind of a temporary stepping
00:13:58.880 aside if i can be quick do you want to just go through each of them rapidly and i can tell you
00:14:02.400 with my thinking behind each one.
00:14:04.340 Okay.
00:14:05.620 Okay, well, we've already done Travis Taves.
00:14:06.980 Yes, I've already done Brian Jean.
00:14:08.180 Already done Brian Jean.
00:14:09.920 Coming back in, actually, Devin Dreeshan.
00:14:12.500 So Devin Dreeshan, we're actually not that far from his riding,
00:14:15.000 just a little south from here.
00:14:16.600 Devin Dreeshan had stepped aside from Cabinet.
00:14:18.860 Back in.
00:14:19.560 What's your thinking there?
00:14:20.260 A couple things.
00:14:21.320 I know that Devin had stepped back because he was dealing
00:14:25.280 with some personal issues, and we are a caucus that allows people
00:14:28.580 to be able to take a little bit of a break if they need
00:14:31.740 be able to deal with some of those personal issues but he is such a great talent such an amazing
00:14:35.580 communicator and he's going to dig into the issue of transportation and economic corridors i'm very
00:14:41.340 keen to have somebody who's bold to to push back against ottawa because we're going to have to 0.99
00:14:45.900 there's going to be a few conflicts there as we start developing those corridors out and i think
00:14:50.140 he's the perfect person for the job so i had loan on the list but we already talked low and um major
00:14:56.620 may i say something about that those two forestry um parks and tourism the reason i put those
00:15:01.340 together is we often feel i often have watched since it seems like forestry which is another
00:15:05.980 major economic driver for us a lot of it in northern alberta seems to always be stuffed into
00:15:11.380 another ministry i wanted to give it the prominence it deserves but remember as well forestry is also
00:15:16.660 the way that we open up our parks that's where you've got atvs able to use some of those forestry
00:15:21.680 back roads that's where you've got camping that's where you've got the those who want to use the
00:15:26.160 backcountry. And to me, it seems like we need to be getting into an attitude that our parks are for
00:15:32.360 use. They are for recreation. They are for having fun. And there are protected lands. Yes. But why
00:15:38.420 aren't we building more campgrounds? Why aren't we creating more opportunities for people to enjoy
00:15:41.940 our parks? I could never get a spot for my trailer. I talked to one of our former tourism ministers
00:15:45.400 and they said, we haven't built park, we haven't built campgrounds in 20 years. That's going to
00:15:48.740 change under Todd Law. And I'm looking forward to that. So out of the really big senior portfolios,
00:15:55.180 i think the biggest change you made was peter guthrie going into energy uh sonia savage moving
00:16:01.100 to environment and protected lands yeah so you know we were talking about how you readjusted
00:16:06.620 that ministry from environment and parks now environment and protected lands which is sort of
00:16:11.660 parks you know but you know it isn't right because my my view is that there are portions of our parks
00:16:17.100 that are protected and there's a portion that are for use and i i think the real problem that we've
00:16:21.020 had an environment is that they take an attitude of let's build a fence around things and let's
00:16:25.260 not use it it's why we don't have adequate uh boat launches if you're trying to use our river system
00:16:30.380 it's why we don't have adequate facilities when you're trying to park in canaanaskis you drive in
00:16:34.540 canaanaskis and you see people lined up on the roads because we don't have enough parking spaces
00:16:38.620 we clearly don't have enough campgrounds and it creates all of this tension so i think that
00:16:43.340 by making sure that we assert that there are certain areas where you're concerned about
00:16:48.460 endangered species and habitat protection, you absolutely want to have a different attitude
00:16:53.500 towards those than the areas that you want to encourage tourism. So we already do have different
00:16:58.220 categorizations for lands, so it shouldn't be that difficult to do. But there's a culture and
00:17:02.300 environment and protected lands that we need to preserve because they are our watchdogs. But there
00:17:06.780 is also a very strong desire to be able to use lands so that we can all be able to enjoy our
00:17:11.900 mountain parks and other areas. So that's the difference between the two. But also Sonja Savage
00:17:16.460 has such immense background in regulatory approvals. She did tremendous work on the energy
00:17:22.420 side, but oftentimes she was getting blocked in wanting to move things forward on the environment
00:17:27.100 side. So now she's in a position to be able to work some of those issues through as well. And
00:17:30.900 I'm looking forward to having that tag team. Pete Guthrie was the head of our energy committee.
00:17:35.420 That's where I first got to know him a couple of years ago. And he's already built a ton of those
00:17:40.040 relationships, especially with our small and mid-sized companies. We know that the economic
00:17:45.180 driver in our province is those small and medium oil and gas companies they've got some big big
00:17:50.460 issues with the regulating agencies and i think pete knows what those issues are so those two
00:17:54.860 are those two ministers are going to work collaboratively on moving a few things forward
00:17:58.860 in particular there was a royalty credit program that i was quite a big champion of in my former
00:18:04.380 life where it was called r star and i know that it will be a way that we can clean up some of
00:18:10.380 our legacy well sites we've got uh legacy well sites going back to the 50s and 60s that just
00:18:16.220 keep getting pushed forward it's creating a black eye for us internationally and i'm highly motivated
00:18:21.660 for us to figure out a process to reclaim those wells all the way through to the end so we can get
00:18:26.220 that land no one appears to have been able to fix that issue i'm i'm starting to throw up my hands
00:18:32.220 i think it might be one of those unfixable issues i can tell you pete guthrie and sonia and sonia
00:18:37.580 savage they'll fix it well i'll hold you to that because i i'm starting to not that i think we'd
00:18:43.820 have to be too hard on you because i'm starting to think it's an unfixable problem but if you
00:18:47.340 can fix it i mean there's a nobel prize in it i'm sure um so let's talk about your deputy premieres
00:18:54.140 um you've got uh the previous uh jason kenney had no deputy premier um there's sometimes been
00:19:02.620 Deputy Premier is Lukaszak for Redford, Sarah Hoffman for Notley. You now have two. One of them
00:19:12.060 I would say is promotion. You've got Casey Maddow. He's also Minister of Infrastructure.
00:19:16.300 Casey Maddow is our Minister for Skilled Trades and Professions.
00:19:21.260 Oh, I was reading. Yes, because your other Deputy Premier is Infrastructure. So you've got Casey
00:19:27.180 Madhu, the sole UCP MLA within Edmonton proper. You've also, you've got MLA surrounding Edmonton
00:19:33.100 proper in the, in the, in the metro region. But then also Nathan Newdorf out of Lethbridge
00:19:39.140 representing, I think Lethbridge East, NDP, Shannon Phillips holding the other one.
00:19:45.540 And also both carrying ministerial portfolios. Why did you choose two deputy premiers? Why these
00:19:52.980 guys and what role are they going to fill? Because very often, and maybe for good reason,
00:19:57.660 deputy premiers, deputy prime ministers, it's somewhat of an honorific office. Like a vice
00:20:03.440 president of the United States, the vice president doesn't have any power in and of himself
00:20:07.040 other than what the president gives them. So what roles do you see these deputy premiers playing and
00:20:14.440 why'd you pick two and why these guys? There's a couple of things. With Casey Maddow, one of the
00:20:20.280 things that is going to be important is to have the continuity from somebody who had been in
00:20:25.140 cabinet. Remember, I'm coming in from the outside and that can always be difficult if you don't
00:20:29.900 have, because I don't have the shared experience of everyone for the last three and a half years
00:20:33.540 and both Casey Maddou and Nathan Newdorf have very deep friendships and relationships that
00:20:39.440 they've built over these past three and a half years, which is really going to be important for
00:20:42.600 me as I make decisions. So with Casey being in Edmonton, it's not that unusual for when you have
00:20:47.840 a premier from the south to be able to have a premier a deputy premier from the north to make
00:20:52.500 sure that you're not missing anything and that's the one of the roles that that Casey Maddu will 1.00
00:20:56.240 play another role of course is going to be um our deputy house leader because we're we've got a new
00:21:02.400 house leader and the deputy house leader plays a role in helping to make sure that the legislative
00:21:06.700 agenda gets through if there are times that I'm not able to be in question period uh Casey will
00:21:12.220 take the lead on answering answering questions because he's he's very skilled at that having
00:21:16.420 done it for the last three and a half years as well um nathan newdorf is going to to uh he's gonna
00:21:22.740 come up the the learning curve on that as well to be able to take on any questions in southern
00:21:27.540 alberta if i happen not to be there as well the other thing that that really struck me when i
00:21:32.660 interviewed casey uh when we were uh going going through the crisis after george floyd was killed
00:21:40.500 we were talking about the ways in which we had to address issues of inclusivity and diversity
00:21:46.180 and one of the things he told me is that when he came to canada he was applying for jobs under his
00:21:50.980 nigerian name kalichi madu and he wasn't getting callbacks and then when he changed his name to
00:21:56.180 casey madu he started getting callbacks and that's the kind of thing that i think is a unconscious
00:22:01.700 bias if you don't have people who are in positions who come from a diverse community you just might
00:22:06.820 make different hiring decisions and you might end up overlooking real talent so this is what i have
00:22:11.700 have tasked him with is that we want to make sure that in all of our hiring decisions, in our
00:22:16.380 political office staff, in our deputy minister areas, as well as going down through various
00:22:22.800 layers in the bureaucracy, our agencies, boards and commissions, I want to make sure that we have
00:22:27.580 people in key hiring positions so that there isn't that unconscious bias, so that we always get the
00:22:32.860 best people for the job. And we're reaching out into our cultural communities to let them know
00:22:37.440 that we want their expertise and we want them to engage with our government in a meaningful way.
00:22:41.700 in a meaningful way. And with Nathan Newdorf, he proposed something quite interesting to me.
00:22:45.860 Sometimes we end up with interdepartmental friction, and he wants to play a role in helping
00:22:51.440 to solve problems. If you end up with a problem that requires cross-ministry coordination,
00:22:57.980 that's the role he's going to play, is to make sure that those barriers end up coming down. He
00:23:01.560 has been caucus chair. He's got incredible interpersonal skills. And so we're going to
00:23:06.320 play two very different roles, but very important ones for me. So we've got a lot of questions,
00:23:10.620 So I don't want to go through every single cabinet minister because it's a fairly large cabinet.
00:23:14.260 And I think we spend the entire time going through every one.
00:23:17.580 So I want to focus on this is a tougher question on who's out.
00:23:22.420 OK, I should mention Rebecca Schultz is also in, though. 0.98
00:23:25.140 Yes, because she's also a leadership candidate. 1.00
00:23:29.160 And Rajan Sani is in, too.
00:23:30.640 Yeah, Rajan Sani is in as well.
00:23:32.100 And we've talked about the role that I want Rajan Sani to play is I have spent a lot of time with the Constitution, as you know,
00:23:39.560 and Section 95 says that the province really should be taking the lead on matters of agriculture
00:23:44.920 and matters of immigration. And one of the frustrations I have had going back to when I was
00:23:49.920 in 2006, when I was doing advocacy for the Canadian Federation of Independent Business,
00:23:55.380 is we have a structure where we go out into the world and we welcome people to Canada,
00:23:59.600 and they arrive in Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver. And then they look around and say,
00:24:02.900 well, where are all the jobs? And then they move to Alberta. But because we have a mismatch in
00:24:07.160 doing foreign credentials recognition, I think that they don't end up getting hired into the
00:24:11.880 positions they have expertise. So there's a combination of roles that are going to solve
00:24:16.200 that problem. And one of them is we want to establish our own robust streams for international
00:24:23.100 talent attraction, much along the lines of Quebec. I've been told Quebec chooses 55%
00:24:30.500 of their nominee of the new arrivals to their country to their country whoops their province
00:24:36.460 i think of themselves as a separate nation within a nation okay fair enough and then
00:24:42.040 manitoba as well they also um they also have a stream that attracts 20 000 people because they
00:24:48.580 have a robust plan to make sure that they're growing their agriculture communities and so
00:24:53.480 if they can do that we can too and that's that's going to be one of the tasks she's charged with
00:24:57.100 And then Rebecca Schultz has just got such a wonderful personality, incredible interpersonal skills, such a talent.
00:25:03.800 And we've got some thorny issues we've got to deal with with our municipalities, some big issues around homelessness that we've got to tackle in Calgary and Edmonton,
00:25:12.560 as well as the problem of unpaid property taxes on linear assessment in rural Alberta.
00:25:18.160 And I can't think of a better person because she comes from a rural background. 0.99
00:25:22.200 She moved to the city. I think she understands both those cultures really well.
00:25:25.740 And she's going to be doing some troubleshooting in that role. 0.99
00:25:29.500 So I'm looking forward to working with her.
00:25:31.440 So I understand a lot of this is confidential, where we're going now into out and some things you're not going to be able to speak about.
00:25:40.900 But I'm going to ask anyway.
00:25:43.540 Some of the names that are out, probably most prominently Jason Nixon.
00:25:46.860 He was house leader and minister of environment under Kenny and then temporarily minister of finance during the leadership race.
00:25:53.380 He's gone, although his brother, Jeremy Nixon, is in another role.
00:25:58.640 Prasad Panda out.
00:26:00.700 Rick McIver is out, although he's not running again, I believe.
00:26:04.300 He hasn't told me that.
00:26:05.260 Oh, okay.
00:26:06.520 I might be misinformed.
00:26:08.180 Okay, so maybe...
00:26:08.740 I'll follow up with him on that.
00:26:09.700 Okay.
00:26:10.340 Whitney Isaac, Ron Orr, tenure for a fan, and Jackie Armstrong.
00:26:17.640 Lelia here was not in it, but she had been a captain minister, 0.87
00:26:21.300 but so she's the only leadership contestant who's not running um sorry who's not not in the cabinet
00:26:27.060 although you know not a particularly strong placing in the in the in the leadership um
00:26:34.420 what was your reasoning for shuffling some of these people out or not adding them back in for
00:26:38.740 the there are some who quite frankly really have to be focused on their their riding because they've
00:26:45.220 got contested nominations. And so I didn't want anyone to be in a situation where they
00:26:52.000 were distracted by having cabinet responsibilities when they've got to resolve their issues at
00:26:57.460 home. So that would be one. The other factor is that there are a number of cabinet ministers
00:27:02.660 who seem to really be the hand of the former premier on a lot of files that caused our
00:27:09.180 party a lot of problems and we uh it's if people are out it's not out forever i've told them that
00:27:15.580 but it is take a back seat for a bit rebuild some relationships work on some files that
00:27:20.860 allow for people to see that you are are prepared to work with us on the on turning the channel on
00:27:26.380 how the um on the restrictions that we faced over the last couple of years and also taking a bolder
00:27:32.620 approach to how we deal with ottawa so some of that was that it's it's just a it's just a break
00:27:38.220 for now maybe not forever but we did need to make sure that the membership understood that i heard
00:27:44.220 them loud and clear that there are many of the people who had been in traditional cabinet roles
00:27:48.700 who i think have done a tremendous job of repairing some of those damaged relationships
00:27:53.340 and demonstrating that they're prepared to make a step forward but i think a couple need to have
00:27:57.500 a little bit more work done on that regard so i guess two follow-ups from that i was going to ask
00:28:02.060 about um some of the nominations going on um there's been some i'd say it's fair to say
00:28:08.860 contentious decisions by the party brass disqualifying candidates in some contested nominations
00:28:18.220 i won't get into the specific writings but i think a lot of people know who they which writings we're
00:28:22.540 talking about um during the leadership race actually during the debate we we had of the
00:28:28.300 front runners you said you would um i don't want to put words in your mouth but i'll tell you what
00:28:32.380 i did say because initially i had been told that there was an appetite to to open those ridings
00:28:37.260 again i i since i i in my opening meeting with the executive they said there really isn't an avenue
00:28:43.100 for the leader to do that that any decision on revisiting would have to be made by the the board
00:28:48.860 and so i'm going to the provincial board the provincial yes yes i'm only one member of it
00:28:54.700 And there's a we're going through nominations or new elections at the AGM this weekend.
00:28:59.520 So I'm not going to prejudge the outcome of that. But I think I want to be respectful of our grassroots members.
00:29:05.020 I want to be respectful as well of the fact that that they will make these decisions.
00:29:09.300 I think one of the issues that we had in the past is that the leader meddled in too many areas, too many ridings.
00:29:16.060 And I don't want to be accused of doing the same on the reverse side.
00:29:19.600 So it'll it'll really be a member decision on whether to revisit any of those.
00:29:23.820 how would that work if there if there's members in a given riding who were upset
00:29:27.980 that all the opponents to an incumbent mla were disqualified um you know and it's good practice 0.97
00:29:37.500 you know we've both been mlas it's good practice to have a friendly local constituency association
00:29:42.540 board you're not a good politician if you can't keep your own board on side generally um so these
00:29:49.020 people might not be controlling the local boards but they might make up a lot of the members and
00:29:52.060 and they haven't had a chance to vote.
00:29:54.320 So how are they going to have their voices expressed
00:29:56.800 if that's already been cut?
00:29:57.880 So this is going to be one of the big battles at this AGM.
00:30:01.540 Quite frankly, there's 28 candidates
00:30:03.720 who are running for the different positions,
00:30:05.520 and there's a number of them that want to revisit
00:30:07.720 exactly the issues that you're raising,
00:30:10.540 and there's others who want to respect the decisions that were made.
00:30:14.080 So I'm just watching it as an observer,
00:30:17.620 so maybe you can ask me that again once we see how those votes go
00:30:21.640 because that would be the first step is whether whether the provincial board has an appetite to
00:30:26.400 revisit any of that yeah I've been of the view that a clean slate is a clean slate and we we
00:30:32.960 have to we have to to perhaps look at how how we do our vetting process I think that there are some
00:30:41.080 people who are concerned that it's overly strict but look I I had a process in back in my day that
00:30:47.480 was underly strict and so where you find that probably not a perfect balance in there it's
00:30:52.440 very it's a these are really difficult decisions and whatever gets shared publicly about why a
00:30:57.620 candidate was disqualified there's always a dossier of things that go behind it you don't want to be
00:31:02.280 damaging people's reputations unnecessarily so i think i my my approach has been uh since there
00:31:09.040 isn't really a role for the leader to unilaterally make those decisions i just want to be respectful
00:31:13.260 of the board process now uh i have a last question on cabinet before we get into some
00:31:18.780 other matters however related um is this you know this cabinet coming in not that long before the
00:31:25.740 next provincial election um and i mean you were not the candidate who had the most support within
00:31:32.620 the existing caucus there's going to be new mlas coming in uh probably within some of the incumbent
00:31:38.860 seats from retirements or if if any incumbents are allowed to be defeated in nominations that
00:31:44.060 kind of thing um is this obviously you will make changes to cabinet if you are re-elected in the
00:31:51.180 spring but is this a cabinet that you're expecting to more or less keep intact through the election
00:31:58.200 like when that election's over and you have a new caucus are you expecting to make any significant
00:32:03.080 changes after when you've got that new caucus in front of you you know you always have to look at
00:32:07.700 new talent coming in and that's that was part of the hard decision that i had to make this time
00:32:11.700 around there there was an opportunity for me i suppose to just grandfather in everybody who was
00:32:17.220 there and then just add the ones that i wanted but then i would have ended up with 40 people in
00:32:20.820 cabinet and we don't want to do that because that makes it really difficult for the public for the
00:32:26.500 administration because they have already established the underpinning of how those different
00:32:32.260 departments work and you you don't want to to be bisecting them too much otherwise you could end
00:32:36.900 up creating silos so i will be keep an open mind with new recruits coming in because we're going
00:32:43.300 to be i think we don't have candidates right now in 27 ridings um we're uh because they're
00:32:49.780 held by the the uh the other party and we also have a number of retirements happening so i don't
00:32:55.380 want to prejudge there's a lot of talent as preston manning used to say you've got to make cabinet
00:32:59.300 out of the wood that you're given unfortunately he was paraphrasing so john mcdonald oh i see now
00:33:03.220 okay unfortunately we've been given some very good wood and i think that we're going to continue
00:33:07.860 attracting some really good people to run for us it makes my job really difficult because
00:33:13.620 i really wish i could give everybody a senior position but those are the tough choices we have
00:33:18.340 to make so we'll prejudge it we'll see what happens after the next election okay so let's uh
00:33:23.540 we've set a whole new world record we've gone 37 minutes and not talked about the sovereignty act
00:33:27.860 oh my gosh never happened that has never happened in any of the interviews i've done in six months
00:33:32.500 yeah well i suppose there's finally been some other things to talk about
00:33:37.060 um it was obviously very contentious during the the leadership race uh the only other candidate
00:33:42.740 besides yourself who supported it in principle was was todd lowen um sources we've spoken to
00:33:50.820 say that you've more or less been able to pacify this around caucus now i i've got a call on though
00:33:59.380 that, you know, you had issued sort of almost a mini white paper during the leadership race
00:34:07.060 on some of these pieces with the Sovereignty Act, particularly as it relates to the Supreme
00:34:11.580 Court of Canada rulings.
00:34:15.560 It's been, I think, probably fairly called somewhat of a walk back, obviously not a full
00:34:20.420 walk back, but it's definitely a break from as it was originally proposed, coming out
00:34:25.040 of the Alberta Free Strategy.
00:34:26.220 Understanding, I know you did not campaign on the Alberta Free Strategy.
00:34:28.720 you campaigned on a modified portion of it the sovereignty act um so i guess two questions one is
00:34:37.840 has this been more or less been pacified with caucus and with the leadership contenders uh
00:34:42.480 or former leadership contenders and um what what changes or give and take were needed to
00:34:49.120 to get caucus on side for that so so first of all i think it was it had to be made clear that i
00:34:54.320 I wasn't just lifting the ideas from the Free Alberta Strategy and saying,
00:34:58.100 holus, bolus, we would implement that.
00:35:00.500 Because as much as I think the Free Alberta Strategy has a number of excellent ideas,
00:35:05.280 I don't think all of them are constitutional, and I don't think all of them can be implemented.
00:35:09.780 But the notion behind the Sovereignty Act really appealed to me because,
00:35:13.220 and especially now that I have gone through some department briefings,
00:35:16.780 I had a suspicion this was going on, but now I know that it is going on.
00:35:20.300 link byfield and i years ago blesses god rest his soul he uh he passed on but when when he and i
00:35:27.500 were collaborating together he he and i did a calgary congress and one of the things that he
00:35:33.780 pointed out at the time that was a major invasion of the federal government into our areas of
00:35:39.100 jurisdiction was their use of the federal spending power what they do is they overtax and then they
00:35:44.100 dribble money back to us with a ton of conditions saying, if you do it our way, you'll get some
00:35:50.500 money. And if you don't, we're not going to transfer your money. And what I've discovered
00:35:54.880 in the departmental briefings is that the federal government is reaching into our jurisdiction
00:35:59.060 all the time at the departmental level, all of the time at the management level. So one of the
00:36:04.900 things I wanted the Sovereignty Act to do is to send a message to all people who work for us
00:36:09.020 that that's not going to be accepted anymore.
00:36:11.860 Anytime a federal government makes an entry into our jurisdiction,
00:36:16.100 it's going to come up to my office.
00:36:17.540 I'm intergovernmental affairs, and I want that to be reported.
00:36:21.560 I want the, because I suspect it's dozens, if not hundreds of times,
00:36:24.840 that they're trying to manipulate how we write our laws,
00:36:27.580 manipulate how we make our decisions,
00:36:29.060 manipulate how we structure our programs, and it's got to stop.
00:36:31.660 They don't do that in Quebec, and they're not going to do it here anymore.
00:36:34.260 So that was one of the ways, I think, that I got people on board.
00:36:36.740 And the other thing, too, is I know that there was this conception that we were just going to ignore court decisions, and I'm not sure how that conception developed, because I always said that in the case of the carbon tax, the Supreme Court had ruled on that.
00:36:50.860 If we wanted to try to find a way to get them to revisit that decision, we'd have to re-challenge it, or we'd have to find some way to offset the amount of cost of the carbon tax.
00:36:59.980 So I always respected the Supreme Court decision.
00:37:02.680 But importantly, the way I see the Sovereignty Act working is it turns the tables on the federal government.
00:37:08.380 Right now, the federal government passes unconstitutional laws all the time and then make us go to court to try to fight to get our rights back.
00:37:15.700 What this would say is it would put up a shield.
00:37:17.700 I would say, no, we're not going to implement federal laws that violate our jurisdiction and they could take us to court instead.
00:37:23.580 So that has always been the way I framed this out, which, as you can see, puts the court in a central role as acting as the referee.
00:37:31.140 And it's up to us to make the best case possible.
00:37:33.580 And it's up to us to demonstrate that we're going to stay out of their lane, but they've got to stay out of ours as well.
00:37:38.700 And I'm prepared to have those court battles.
00:37:41.380 So following on this with the Sovereignty Act, we have seen, much to my surprise now,
00:37:48.200 five provinces and territories say that uh they're not uh they're not going to comply with
00:37:55.720 ottawa's orders to use their provincial police forces to go and confiscate guns that the federal
00:38:02.540 liberal government have just declared to be illegal uh it began with uh alberta uh shandro
00:38:08.340 announced that um soon before you were um elected leader of the ucp followed quickly by saskatchewan
00:38:15.300 and Manitoba, and then started really surprisingly when I think it was New Brunswick
00:38:19.820 and Yukon. And Yukon's not even a center-right government right now.
00:38:26.960 Do you think that this is going to kind of validate, does this provide a validation for
00:38:32.380 your plan with the Sovereignty Act? And what does this say for maybe the ability for you to build
00:38:37.420 alliances with other provinces to engage in Sovereignty Act style disregard of federal
00:38:43.780 orders in areas of provincial jurisdiction. Yeah. I think what happens when you put a bold
00:38:47.700 idea forward, initially everybody says, what? What are you talking about? You can't do that.
00:38:52.140 And then as they start thinking about it, they say, hmm, maybe we can do it. And then as they
00:38:55.860 start seeing ways in which it can be used, they say, darn it, we are going to do it. And I think 0.94
00:38:59.280 that that's been the transition that has happened over the past six months. And I've been delighted
00:39:02.700 to see it because we have been acting as provinces like a subordinate level of government to the
00:39:07.840 federal government. And we're not. We have exclusive jurisdiction in our own areas. And I
00:39:12.780 i think that i've already spoken with premier mo and i spoke with premier stefenson and i think
00:39:17.500 that we're going to develop an amazing partnership with with with those two provinces in particular
00:39:23.020 to act as a united front against federal intrusion but also attack collaboratively on building out
00:39:28.620 economic corridors and working to make sure that that manitoba's hydroelectric power comes across
00:39:34.220 the the prairies and that we're able to get our products to market as well so i i think that this
00:39:39.180 is going to be a really exciting stage in the development of inter-provincial relations and
00:39:44.620 putting Ottawa in its back in its proper role and as many allies as wants to work with beyond that
00:39:50.620 i am i'm delighted to work with them so uh i'm keenly aware of the time and that i have not left
00:39:57.100 a ton of time for questions from others yet i just think my questions are so great people might
00:40:01.340 disagree well you know the cabinet decisions are big changes really so i can understand why you
00:40:05.980 wanted to do that i should also mention one really important area um is uh two important areas so
00:40:11.900 you'll notice that mike ellis has been moved into the role of public safety and i should i should
00:40:17.660 point out that the rcmp contract and our fight with ottawa over how we're going to move forward
00:40:23.020 on an alberta provincial police that's going to stay with with tyler shandro because he is doing
00:40:26.700 such a tremendous job on that he's got another one he's got a fight today marco mendocino just
00:40:31.100 announced that we are going to end all of the sale of firearms or for handguns he thinks he thinks so
00:40:37.420 um i i asked the minister if he would put out a statement on that so i know that he's he's up for
00:40:43.180 a big fight on that but the these are really important issues because they're they go to our
00:40:47.660 different cultural values in alberta we are a different culture here and that is not in alignment
00:40:53.020 with how it is we want our policing resources to be used when our policing resources to be used to
00:40:57.740 fight real criminals to make sure that we're stopping smuggling of guns across the border
00:41:03.100 and to deal with some of the gang and organized crime problems that we see that are plaguing
00:41:06.860 cities so on the encounter side of that mike ellis has done tremendous work on mental health
00:41:13.740 and addictions and we are now world renowned in the approach that we're taking which is treatment
00:41:18.780 first because once you approach from a treatment point of view there's a certain percentage of
00:41:23.820 people who are going to be able to get clean from drugs permanently and go back to independent living
00:41:27.420 and we've had amazing success on that so mike ellis has a former history as a calgary police
00:41:33.020 officer and it seemed to me that in the new model of policing we've got to be mindful that a lot of
00:41:39.420 the calls more than half of them are mental health and addiction calls and so as we're building out
00:41:44.460 our alberta provincial police i think that mike is going to be the perfect person to be able to do
00:41:48.780 that so public safety becomes a new prominent role as when as the minister of justice resolves
00:41:55.580 our issues with the rcmp contract and we have to start building out app it's going to switch over
00:41:59.660 to mike ellis's role plus i also discovered that so the current police is under justice yeah but
00:42:07.020 when the app comes it's going to be as we start building out it's going to to go under mike ellis
00:42:12.380 because for for me i want the new policing culture to reflect the fact that it's not going to be a
00:42:17.980 paramilitary type of style of training as we have had historically what we need is some is to attract
00:42:23.980 new officers in who are sensitive to the fact that they may be doing more mental health and
00:42:28.780 addiction calls. And it requires a different approach. When I was on the air, one of the
00:42:33.300 things that really hurt my heart was when Anthony Heffernan was killed in his hotel room when four
00:42:39.980 officers arrived on the scene within 70 seconds, shot him four times because they thought he had
00:42:44.380 a gun in his hand and it was a syringe. He was struggling with addiction. And there were a couple
00:42:50.320 of other stories like that in Calgary. And I just thought, you know, we need a different approach
00:42:54.060 in these kinds of matters. And that's why I think Mike is going to be tremendous in leading that.
00:42:58.800 And that will, and I'll tell you why that's so important too, is that I've heard in our rural
00:43:03.020 areas, part of the reason why we have a real property crime is that it's an unaddressed
00:43:08.840 addiction problem in Calgary and Edmonton that are causing addicts to come into the rural areas
00:43:13.400 to steal big farm equipment so that they can feed their addiction. So if we can circle back and have 0.92
00:43:18.780 an integrated approach on policing so that we can address the problem in Calgary and Edmonton
00:43:22.640 and also have additional forces to be able to address rural property crime. That's something
00:43:26.860 that I think Mike Ellis is going to be instrumental in bringing through. The other part is Alberta
00:43:33.260 Emergency Management Agency. It's always bothered me that it's sort of tucked away in municipal
00:43:37.720 affairs. So that is also going to be in the public safety ministry so that when we have a forest fire
00:43:43.040 or we have a flood or we have a an ice storm that requires activation of the provincial emergency
00:43:49.200 management everybody knows where to go and they're already got the forces that are integrated under
00:43:53.280 one umbrella so it'll take a little bit of work to get there but the work that mike ellis did on
00:43:57.120 pulling all of the mental health and addiction supports into a single ministry so it could be
00:44:01.900 effective i i think he's exactly the right person to do that in this case too okay so we're going
00:44:07.520 to switch it up a bit um i know some of you in the comment section have been complaining that i've
00:44:11.180 been looking away from the premier and you think it's been very disrespectful of me i assure you
00:44:16.880 i'm actually looking you can't see it i'm looking at the comment section over here i'm looking at
00:44:21.760 you saying derek stop being mean to the premier and i assure you i'm not attempting to at least
00:44:26.980 intentionally to be mean to the premier uh i'm looking at your comments so i can actually
00:44:31.740 ask a few of them so it's not just my questions so um i've got a couple of uh questions from
00:44:38.960 But from people watching, we've already touched on a little bit with cabinet.
00:44:45.900 But it says so I think it was Bryce or Bryn Aaron says, how will you hold people accountable for the terrible decisions made over the last two years?
00:44:56.000 Now, I know you said on the night you were elected, it's a clean slate.
00:44:58.840 we're moving forward but i think there's still an expectation from from some that accountability is
00:45:04.360 going to be done for some of the things that have been i think less than ideal over the last three
00:45:10.440 two and a half years you know what i'm i hold alberta health services accountable i hold i
00:45:14.920 hold that um we we gave them a lump sum of money and said run health care for us and we were told
00:45:23.480 let the experts be in charge they've got it all figured out they've developed integrated
00:45:29.000 partnerships across the country with their uh public the medic chief medical officers of health
00:45:35.320 they also have their own coveted scientific committees that were giving advice to government
00:45:41.240 and i think that um to be fair to premier kenny he's a brand new government coming in brand new
00:45:47.480 leader he'd been focused on federal issues for most of his career he's brand new in health and
00:45:51.880 they were already beginning to see that they had problems in health but then 10 months into his
00:45:56.200 mandate he gets hit with a global pandemic and he's looking around seeing what the rest of the
00:46:00.440 world is doing and these guys are all saying we're the experts we know what we're doing and
00:46:04.360 so he trusted them um i think that when uh the government fired vernie you that was pretty clear
00:46:10.360 that we needed new leadership and a change of direction and i think that to the the fact that
00:46:15.640 the premier lost his position shows that it was an error when um when vaccine exemptions or vaccine
00:46:21.480 mandates came in so i think that there has already been that the ultimate accountability is the the
00:46:28.280 the leader at the top who was ultimately responsible for making that decision is not
00:46:32.120 there anymore a couple of his close allies and making that decision they're also taking a back
00:46:37.320 seat there are others who have been speaking openly about how they were fighting behind the
00:46:43.000 scenes and i appreciate the fact that they did do that but rank and file mlas really didn't have
00:46:48.280 a role in making these decisions and that's one of the problems that's one thing we're fixing is
00:46:53.240 that we're changing our policy making process so that mlas know our direction of government right 1.00
00:46:59.160 from the beginning and they get to tell us right from the beginning if we're going in the right
00:47:02.280 direction rather than announcing the policy and then bringing them in at the end so that's going
00:47:07.000 to i think solve a lot of problems but um i must tell you i i believe that alberta health services
00:47:13.400 is the source of a lot of the problems that we've had they signed a some kind of of a partnership
00:47:18.920 with the world economic forum right in the middle of um of the pandemic we've got to address that
00:47:24.120 why in the world do we have anything to do with the whole world economic forum that's got to end
00:47:28.600 we've they also have the scientific committee that quite frankly didn't look at the whole
00:47:33.160 broad science they want to make themselves permanent i saw that in one of your stories
00:47:36.600 i don't think so i don't want to have a scientific committee advising me that isn't prepared to look
00:47:42.040 at therapeutic options in the middle of a pandemic and throw out the pandemic planning plan and i
00:47:47.000 must point out that i've watched that event 201 which is a planned pandemic planning exercise
00:47:53.000 and the very first thing they say you should do is to find an effective therapeutic so that as
00:47:58.120 you're seeking a vaccine you're you're keeping people from dying so i think that the experts
00:48:03.720 let us down so i'm not interested in taking in any advice from them we will have new leadership on
00:48:09.160 the board and i don't mean this to disparage any of the board members when you put a board in place
00:48:13.480 you're really putting them in place as kind of a caretaker to maintain institutions this is not an
00:48:18.040 institution i want to maintain as is so there will be a removal of that board in the course of time
00:48:25.160 and probably sooner rather than later with the reinstatement after we've done our restructuring
00:48:29.640 so the restructuring is going to come and the uh the the issue around uh around who gets held
00:48:36.280 accountable is almost entirely going to be in alberta health services they told us to trust
00:48:41.720 them we did they let us down and there has to be accountability for that in addition i i'm waiting
00:48:47.640 for the opportunity to um to purge the qr code database that i have i'm trying to i've already
00:48:53.880 put the request in how do we go about doing that we are human beings we are not qr codes and i
00:48:59.160 never want to see a restaurant ask me ever again to uh to show my vaccine status as a point of
00:49:06.760 entry so do know that there'll be a number of steps that happen in that regard but i had to
00:49:11.560 make sure to get my cabinet in place first but um jason copping's up for the job he's been going
00:49:16.680 around the province talking to rural albertans um and rj segerson as you've seen his parliamentary
00:49:22.200 secretary for ems he's been going around the province as well talking about ems services
00:49:27.080 both of those are going to to have robust changes to them and i'm just asking the public
00:49:33.000 that if we're going to make these changes i know it's going to be a little bit bumpy for
00:49:37.560 for the next 90 days and we want to hear the feedback if we're making any mistakes along the
00:49:42.680 way but keeping things the way they are is not an option there has to be some accountability
00:49:47.960 for what happened over the past three and a half two and a half years and we also have to
00:49:53.000 make sure that we are putting in place the the resources at the local level so people can get
00:50:00.280 the health care that they need it's not acceptable to be waiting in the back of an ambulance for nine
00:50:04.040 hours it's not acceptable to be waiting in an emergency room for 29 hours that ends so we've
00:50:09.400 got just five minutes left i want to be respectful uh with your time i will take as much as time as
00:50:14.280 you will give but i i'll respect it here um so i just kind of a lightning question because you've
00:50:22.440 been giving very fulsome oh questions no they're no they're short they're good they're good but
00:50:27.560 they're fulsome and i'm so i want to get a couple more in so just following on that one uh you said
00:50:32.680 that you're not going to be taking advice further from from uh dina hinshaw uh chief medical officer
00:50:38.600 or the province uh but i read it as somewhat of an ambiguous uh statement maybe you can clarify it
00:50:44.440 is she going to be relieved of her is she going to be removed from the position or is she just
00:50:49.960 more or less being phased out from the decision making process i'm going to be working with my
00:50:54.760 health minister on that we'll make a joint decision okay um so mikey uh wants you to address uh what
00:51:03.240 What he says is woke indoctrination in schools.
00:51:06.240 I've got a young daughter in kindergarten.
00:51:08.440 I do not send her to a public school very much for this kind of thing. 0.87
00:51:14.220 I suppose pretty quick, what would you do around the concern of parents that particularly in public schools,
00:51:22.480 that it's just a lot of woke indoctrination, that they're just having the values of the ATA pushed on kids rather than focusing on the basis of education?
00:51:30.560 That's being debated at our AGM this weekend.
00:51:32.520 there's going to be a motion put forward on that i will monitor the debate and i'll take
00:51:36.360 the direction from our members once i see what what the issues are and what some of their solutions
00:51:40.280 are that was quick um so it was really quick okay um i've got ryan i cannot really pronounce his
00:51:49.000 last name i sympathize ryan people can't pronounce mine sometimes um he asks if you're going to
00:51:54.520 withdraw what are you going to do you go to potentially would you order your justice
00:51:59.080 minister or solicitor general to withdraw charges or fines against people who got in trouble during
00:52:05.560 uh coveted restrictions i mean we're actually extremely close to grace life church that was
00:52:11.320 raided the province raided the church order police to raid the church they put up barricades around
00:52:16.680 it they charge pastor uh pastor coats um i mean just that's one of many many examples would you
00:52:24.040 you be willing to consider a um if i could rephrase ryan's question a sort of a pardon program
00:52:29.740 to have people reimburse for these charges and their legal costs and this kind of thing i love
00:52:34.660 the sounds of that there's there's sort of two categories though there there are instances that
00:52:39.180 rose to a level of criminal prosecution and i i have to let that process play out i think it'd
00:52:44.600 be inappropriate for me to step in if there's a criminal prosecution in the case of firearms for
00:52:48.880 instance or if there was an assault that those kind of processes have to play out yeah yeah but
00:52:53.000 when it comes to fines for a pastor, I mean, I have to tell you, the criminal code gives
00:52:57.300 protection for pastors. You are not allowed to interrupt a sermon. That's how seriously we take
00:53:03.460 the role of our men and women who wear the cloth. And so I think that there was an error made in
00:53:10.180 that regard. I'm trying to figure out where that lies. I don't think it lies in the Justice
00:53:14.260 Department. I think that lies in the Health Department. And so there was a whole crew of
00:53:19.180 enforcement officers led by teams of AHS inspectors. And I will, I will, as soon as I can find out
00:53:25.980 the status of those, my intention would be to, would be to deliver a blanket amnesty that was
00:53:32.560 inappropriate political decisions that led to that, that inappropriate enforcement. And so it
00:53:39.280 seems to me it's a political decision to say, we made a mistake, we're sorry, won't happen again.
00:53:44.260 Very interesting. Okay, so I'm going to take the last question just for myself.
00:53:48.000 You're running in the Brooks Medicine Hat by-election.
00:53:52.060 It's an area I know well.
00:53:53.000 I represent half of my constituency before it was dissolved before the last election.
00:53:56.860 It was Strathmore Brooks.
00:53:57.900 Now it's Brooks Medicine Hat.
00:54:00.260 It's a very interesting pocket of the province.
00:54:04.940 There's an ADP candidate, Alberta party leader, Barry Morishita, who I know from my time there,
00:54:11.400 and then a few other smaller parties potentially running.
00:54:15.820 How much time are you going to be?
00:54:17.040 I mean, you just came into the premier's office.
00:54:20.040 It's a lot on your plate.
00:54:22.740 How much time are you going to be able to spend campaigning there,
00:54:25.580 earning the support of people in Brooks Medicine Hat?
00:54:29.020 And what kind of results are you looking for?
00:54:31.680 Because it's considered, I think, quite fairly to be a pretty dark blue constituency.
00:54:37.360 It was, you know, from old wild rose country.
00:54:41.760 What's your expectation for a result other than win?
00:54:44.960 I know you're going to say you're going to win, but I don't know, I'm going to try and get a
00:54:48.280 little more information out of you. Well, a couple things. I'm grateful for the teams that
00:54:52.340 are down there working in door knocking because they know how busy I've been in the first couple
00:54:57.480 of weeks on the job. I got sworn in on the 11th, met with 60 MLAs in six days. We had our caucus
00:55:03.520 retreat. I had to make all of my cabinet decisions and cabinet calls. I had to get briefings on
00:55:07.900 deputy minister portfolio, deputy ministers from various portfolios. And now we have our AGM this
00:55:14.460 weekend and then we'll have caucus swearing in on our cabinet swearing in on the 24th so
00:55:18.780 i'm grateful that people are understanding that these first couple of weeks were we're pretty
00:55:23.640 busy but i'll be spending most of the next couple of weeks in the in the riding i want to make sure
00:55:28.760 that i do some door knocking we're going to have rallies i believe we're working on a debate down
00:55:33.680 there and i i the nice part about having been a leader before as well as gone through this
00:55:39.420 leadership race is I've been in the in the communities several times met with many many
00:55:44.580 people have an understanding of what some of the local issues are already and I'll I'll be able to
00:55:50.100 elevate those issues the way I the reason I wanted to represent a rural riding and it is a mirror
00:55:54.140 image of the riding I'd initially wanted to run in which was Livingston McLeod which is my home
00:55:58.000 riding is because I love that combination of sort of a mid-sized city and small cities I like the
00:56:04.740 the combination of having some rural towns, the agriculture, not only the primary production,
00:56:10.680 but also the value added. We've got the canes down there. We've got issues around transportation
00:56:14.480 infrastructure. We have proposals that have been on the table for new irrigation infrastructure,
00:56:19.360 not only to deal with flood mitigation, but also to deal with food production, maybe also
00:56:23.580 hydroelectric production, developing new reservoirs. We have new areas for campgrounds
00:56:29.220 and recreation. And to me, this riding has it all. It's got all of the most wonderful issues
00:56:34.140 around our primary production on forestry and agriculture and oil and gas, as well as the really
00:56:39.880 important issues that we're facing in rural Alberta and mid-sized cities. I feel like rural Alberta
00:56:45.620 was perhaps not hurt enough in the last two and a half years. And as you know, and I know,
00:56:54.040 when rural Alberta is ignored, they go and create a new political party. So I wanted them to know
00:56:58.000 that even though I grew up in Calgary and I understand Calgary issues well, and I was on
00:57:02.640 for six years in Calgary, my heart is in rural Alberta and they will not, will not be forgotten
00:57:09.060 again. And their, their issues are very much front and center for me. Well, pro tip, when you're in
00:57:13.500 Brooks, go to the Brooks hotel and you get the corned beef sandwich with sauerkraut. It's the
00:57:17.180 best sandwich in town. I love it. I didn't intend to do that. Thanks for the tip. Okay. Well,
00:57:23.260 we're all out of time. I'm very grateful for you sharing your time with us, Madam Premier.
00:57:27.820 I hope we can do this again and good luck this weekend. My pleasure. Thanks so much, Derek.
00:57:31.860 And thank all of you for joining us on what is the first of what I hope many question periods with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith.
00:57:41.860 Thank you. God bless.
00:58:01.860 You