Rise of Canadian Hate Science
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
152.36078
Summary
In this episode, Dr. David Fisman talks about his new book, "Dispelling the Pandemic of the Unvaccinated Narrative" and why he believes it's a must-listen book for anyone who wants to understand the origins of the pandemic.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
there's been a lot of uh shenanigans during the pandemic and a lot of fraud and uh and i've been
00:00:06.160
fighting this since day one but basically um i i came across well everybody came across an
00:00:15.040
overtly fraudulent uh piece of research that targeted um unvaccinated individuals and
00:00:21.280
scapegoated them and uh basically i knew right then and there i had to do my best to take it down
00:00:29.280
so basically my book dispels the pandemic of the unvaccinated narrative it shows that it's purely
00:00:36.960
political and that it was propped up by fraudulent science and it focuses on a particular case of
00:00:43.360
scientific fraud that was committed by a university of toronto professors the main author of the of the
00:00:52.800
scientific research was david fisman he has basically been canada's front man for pandemic
00:01:00.240
modeling he is a tenured professor at the university of toronto he's also a physician
00:01:07.520
and he has advised all levels of government from municipal to provincial to federal during the
00:01:12.720
pandemic and uh basically what happened with their study was that um when the pandemic when it was
00:01:23.200
shown that the pandemic of the unvaccinated narrative was false that it completely broke down this was
00:01:29.280
after omicron um the re researchers at the university of toronto basically concocted a model that simulated
00:01:38.320
fake data to show that unvaccinated people had higher incident rates than vaccinated individuals
00:01:45.440
and as such were a disproportionate risk to others and then they tried to pass off their fake data and
00:01:51.520
their fake results as a true reflection of reality even though uh official government of ontario data
00:01:57.680
showed basically the opposite um and then from there there was a big media frenzy warning
00:02:05.520
uh everybody of the risk of merely hanging out with the unvaccinated well yeah and that's part of what
00:02:11.840
really got to me was this this social division that they sewed with this agenda i mean not just the the
00:02:18.560
study but the other people who followed up on i mean the the vaccinations were initially sold at least
00:02:24.080
uh with the case being made that this is going to prevent transmission and we found out pretty quickly
00:02:28.720
once they were being applied whatever i mean we can debate the benefits or whether they reduce symptoms
00:02:33.520
or not or whatever but they did not have any impact on the transmissibility of that which should have
00:02:39.840
with rational moral people said well we can't keep yelling at people that they're putting everybody
00:02:44.400
else at risk or in danger and we shouldn't be trying to segregate people or pressure people
00:02:48.640
saying you're going to kill my grandmama if you don't get vaccinated because the vaccines did
00:02:53.440
nothing to stop the transmission right there the narrative should have changed but instead
00:02:58.000
they doubled down yeah they doubled down on it because it's a real problem for the government
00:03:03.200
if um it doesn't curtail transmission mandates don't make sense the mandates don't make sense the
00:03:08.720
passports don't make sense the travel restriction nothing they did makes sense when it comes to the
00:03:12.720
restrictions they put in place so they're doing everything they can to double down um even now
00:03:19.600
they're doubled down on that narrative they've never admitted they were wrong and they're still saying the
00:03:25.040
same thing it's difficult to get those discussions out like when we were doing our uh productions at
00:03:32.240
that time if i mentioned the word vaccine on youtube we'd be punted off the channel uh we we could if we
00:03:38.800
wanted to maintain our ability to keep broadcasting it was a no-go area for us we had to talk around in
00:03:45.200
circles to avoid the algorithms it was just brutal like why why were they so afraid of discourse on what
00:03:52.240
should be such an important issue well with when it comes to transmission um they basically set things
00:04:02.160
up i believe to bring in mandates in the future and so they don't want to back down on their on their
00:04:09.040
narrative and what happened with the fisman study is fisman and his colleagues they they basically
00:04:15.920
committed an overt textbook case of scientific fraud to prop up these mandates and restrictions and
00:04:27.200
the issue is that when i tried to get the paper retracted instead of um admitting there was a
00:04:33.920
problem the the journal the canadian medical association journal would not retract the article
00:04:39.600
even though dozens of scientists rebuked the findings uh the university of toronto backed it
00:04:45.280
uh the canadian institutes of health research they they're standing by it so now you have that top
00:04:51.600
institutions are basically complicit in this fraud which makes it really bad for them because it is
00:04:59.520
it is provable um and when you show that institutions are willing to commit fraud to scapegoat
00:05:06.000
a segment of the population then that segment requires protections and basically that's what i'm trying
00:05:12.400
to do with this book is is force protections for um you know basic based on vaccine choice and medical choice