Western Standard - October 06, 2026


The bigger question: What happens after the vote?

Mentioned
Did David Eby unite the B.C. right by calling an election?

Episode Stats


Length

41 minutes

Words per minute

181.96

Word count

7,642

Sentence count

166

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 With only a few weeks to go before the October 19th referendum, it is time to take stock.
00:00:05.760 One thing is true.
00:00:07.140 Both sides of the debate have very strong proponents, but that doesn't necessarily mean
00:00:12.240 that everyone's thinking strategically.
00:00:15.280 Today's episode is going to take us into some strategic thinking.
00:00:18.900 What do we know now, and what is likely to happen, and then what's the best course of
00:00:23.280 action after that?
00:00:24.860 This is Nation of People.
00:00:26.060 I'm Natalie St. Hilaire.
00:00:27.920 me is randy royer and our guest today is kata lemon the co-owner and publisher of avenue magazine
00:00:36.800 in Calgary. Before we get to talking to Keita, let's set up the discussion. For the Alberta
00:01:01.460 activists that want change, a few things are important. First, understand the field. There
00:01:07.960 are at least three hills to climb that one could die upon. This referendum, the provincial election
00:01:14.920 in October next year, and the final binding referendum. Each one is a tough hill to climb
00:01:21.180 because proponents are inherently asking the public to take a leap of faith and take a risk.
00:01:26.580 This is always hard in our current climate of political turmoil. It is even harder.
00:01:33.640 Third, as in the art of war, it is imperative to understand both sides.
00:01:39.020 Conquering these hills means that the moderate middle needs to be persuaded.
00:01:43.020 Today, we are going to explore that moderate middle, and we will look at the reality of the situation from a more strategic perspective.
00:01:49.540 of okay Kate Ed thank you so much for joining us oh thank you for having me I
00:01:58.040 would love for you to tell the audience a little bit more about you how it is
00:02:02.080 that you came to have spent so much time with the people of Calgary well I moved
00:02:07.220 to Calgary in 2004 from Toronto immediately before I finished my
00:02:11.880 master's degree and my now husband said well I have a job in Calgary so you
00:02:15.580 should move to Calgary I'm not going to move to Toronto neither where neither
00:02:18.340 the rest had jobs. And I said, I'll give it one year. And that was in 2004. And yeah, it's been
00:02:24.720 an amazing experience. I definitely consider myself a Calgarian. And I was very, very lucky
00:02:29.400 to get a job at Red Point with Avenue Magazine. I started there in 2006. I became the editor in
00:02:36.840 the end of 2006. And I've spent basically my career championing Calgary and getting to talk
00:02:43.540 to Calgarians about what they love about this city, what keeps them here, what brought them here,
00:02:48.940 and really share that joy and love. You know, our purpose is we love Calgary. And so I always say
00:02:55.100 too, you know, I love my husband. I used to give this example all the time of saying, I love my
00:03:00.140 husband, but he leaves his socks on the floor sometimes, and I wish he'd changed that. And
00:03:04.240 that's how we think of Calgary is like, we love Calgary, but there are things that we'd love to
00:03:08.240 change. And I will say, I told my husband that I use this as an anecdote, and he no longer leaves
00:03:12.880 his socks on the floor so it works right you you can point out these things and we always approach
00:03:17.620 Calgary and what we want to see change from the perspective of Calgarians are already working to
00:03:22.640 improve Calgary Calgarians really are they dig in on the problems they dig in on the solutions
00:03:28.500 and I think one of the things I love most about Calgary is how optimistic and hard-working
00:03:33.660 Calgarians are and how welcoming they are yeah there's definitely a very special energy that I
00:03:38.400 feel for this city and I love it also so I'm glad to hear that um so what do you like if you were
00:03:44.260 going to sort of broad stroke explain Calgary as a place um what would you say about it I mean kind
00:03:51.340 of just it hard-working optimistic I mean how do you think that compares with maybe the rest of
00:03:57.220 Alberta or the rest of the country I'm and I'm called upon not infrequently to say what you know
00:04:03.820 give us a, you know, Cole's notes on what is Calgary. I've lived across the country. So I've
00:04:08.940 lived in Toronto. I was raised in Southwestern Ontario. I went to, I finished high school in
00:04:16.400 Vancouver. I went to university in Victoria. I've lived and worked in Halifax. I went on a student
00:04:22.120 exchange to Montreal. I've, I've been across the country. And what I would say, and what I always
00:04:28.180 do say about Calgary is it is the most welcoming city I've ever worked in and lived in. It is the
00:04:33.560 friendliest city. It is the sunniest city, both in terms of climate, but also in terms of the way
00:04:40.660 people approach problems. People here, when Calgarians are doing their best, they are very
00:04:46.160 optimistic about the future. They think that things can be improved, and they think they are the ones
00:04:50.100 who can improve them. Whereas there are a lot of cities in this country where the approach is the
00:04:56.240 problems are intractable, they'll never be solved, things will never get better, and if they're going
00:05:01.500 get better we need to bring in outside help that is not the approach here and it's very refreshing
00:05:05.980 and calgarians i think have a have a can-do attitude and that attracts new people who have
00:05:11.820 that attitude as well that people come here and if they recognize that and they want that they
00:05:16.300 stay here yeah that resonates with me it makes me angry and people tell me there's no solution
00:05:21.900 or to just sort of like give up like i can't understand i can't live in that kind of a yeah
00:05:27.180 like so what what now what do we do with that then like what's the point of even talking yeah
00:05:32.140 so i think that that is something that i have really loved about calgarians and calgary business
00:05:37.660 owners and calgary community leaders is that they're they're very much it's and it's not just
00:05:43.660 they think the problem can be solved it's that they think they can solve it or they know somebody
00:05:48.220 they know someone else who they've met who's in calgary who's like oh they have a really good
00:05:52.460 idea let's talk to them for a pathway yeah yeah there's opportunity and it's like if we put our
00:05:57.500 you know our thinking together then we can fix this and i think that's a wonderful
00:06:03.340 just viewpoint to have yeah and i think that the the current political like the referendum
00:06:08.700 the moment that we're in really comes out of that kind of thinking in a way i think it can
00:06:14.140 yeah that idea of like we have there's there are some real problems here we need a solution
00:06:19.500 Here's one.
00:06:20.420 Does it resonate?
00:06:21.420 And I think that's the question that I think you're asking is, hey, does this resonate?
00:06:26.080 And in which ways does it resonate?
00:06:28.000 Is this the solution that we want to move forward with?
00:06:30.880 Well, if I may interject it, I mean, you're talking about the Alberta spirit.
00:06:34.440 Yeah.
00:06:34.760 And I'm from Lethbridge originally, and that spirit is right through the entire province.
00:06:39.880 And it's funny that we're stuck in this referendum where we have these two choices.
00:06:43.860 And what we really want to do is just do exactly what you said.
00:06:47.060 or Calgarians, Albertans, just say, I can fix this problem.
00:06:50.040 I can do it myself.
00:06:51.200 And that's the spirit that we need to call upon.
00:06:53.240 And over the next few episodes, we're going to actually be talking about that directly.
00:06:56.620 So given that we've recognized this sort of cultural difference,
00:07:00.880 how, in your experience and with your contacts sort of all over the country,
00:07:04.660 what do you think the rest of the country is thinking about this moment with Alberta?
00:07:09.820 I think one of the things about Canada is that the provinces,
00:07:14.000 the different cities actually don't spend that much time thinking about each other and that's
00:07:20.540 one of the biggest problems right is like so when you say well what does Halifax think about
00:07:24.320 Alberta generally they don't right and neither does Montreal and neither does Toronto and neither
00:07:31.340 does Vancouver they're just like we're working we're focused on our problems and sometimes quite
00:07:36.000 very tiny problems like everybody's really focused on bike lanes like everybody's everybody's having
00:07:41.960 the same conversation about bike lanes and it's like hey maybe if we talked together we could
00:07:46.660 come up with some solutions but in any case I think um this is a little bit of a wake-up call
00:07:52.160 to a lot of people across the country of like what what's happening what what is this but I
00:07:57.840 think the biggest reaction from most places that I've seen is just they're kind of flummoxed like
00:08:03.880 we don't know what this we don't know what your problem is so we haven't taken the opportunity to
00:08:08.500 really explain ourselves very well is what I'm hearing but also I think also
00:08:13.360 Alberta is like you guys don't think about us and it's like everyone's like
00:08:16.240 yeah likewise you don't know what it's like to be Newfoundland and we don't we
00:08:23.680 don't yeah and so I think that's that's the context of the problem you know it's
00:08:28.940 very similar to a lot of the discussion with the US is like well what do they
00:08:31.720 think about us they don't you know they so most Americans aren't spending a lot
00:08:36.280 time thinking about how are canadians reacting to this or when they are it's new that's a new piece
00:08:42.600 i think the reaction i've seen in toronto is uh not infrequently especially late is uh yeah we
00:08:48.760 understand there's some problems and it's like you're big boys figure it out you solve it so
00:08:53.080 you solve the problem it's not our problem to solve i got to face the 401 here and i got a
00:08:57.880 full day of doing that yeah so you need to solve your own problem and that's what we haven't done
00:09:02.600 yet well i think especially for ontario coming at a time when ontario is facing very significant
00:09:08.360 problems of their own and they're just like can we just not do this right now can we just
00:09:15.400 worry about manufacturing and lake ontario can we just well i think if i can refine that a little
00:09:22.200 bit it's not that can we not do this right now it's more like can you handle it like you know
00:09:26.680 like tell us what you want but you need to tell us because we're you know don't expect us to put it
00:09:31.800 on a silver plate for you and i think that's kind of the mistake that we've been making you find it
00:09:36.440 in the words ottawa doesn't treat us properly but i think you're also pointing to a difference here
00:09:41.640 right on when we talk about ontario we sort of conflate ottawa and toronto that's right and no
00:09:48.440 and we don't talk about rural ontario at all we don't care um which again is part of that problem
00:09:54.040 so when you're saying like ottawa doesn't do this yeah they they maybe they don't when we're using
00:09:58.680 Ottawa as meaning the federal government but when you're saying how does Ontario feel about this
00:10:03.720 what you're kind of asking is what is the general sentiment in Ontario and the general sentiment on
00:10:10.360 Ontario is not the sentiment of the federal government it's correct those are two different
00:10:16.360 groups of people um in in many ways because the other part of it is that they Ontario also has
00:10:25.160 problems with the federal government. Quebec also has problems with the
00:10:28.640 federal government. We're all part of a country where the provinces and the
00:10:33.140 federal government are not of one mind. Absolutely. So that's, there's two pieces
00:10:39.800 of that question that are getting smushed together. Well, and we need to
00:10:44.040 sort that out. There's a couple of things that I wanted to comment on. First of
00:10:47.240 us, there's a couple years back there was a survey and the survey question was
00:10:51.560 which province other than your own is most friendly to your province and um which is kind
00:10:56.920 of an interesting question but was what was fascinating in nine of i guess eight of the
00:11:03.000 other provinces outside of alberta alberta was always number one or number two as the most
00:11:08.280 friendly province so other provinces perceived alberta to be friendly to them exactly okay
00:11:13.000 in the first spot or the second spot you know saskatchewan we were number one british columbia
00:11:18.120 we were number one. Ontario, we were number one. The only one that was different was Quebec. And
00:11:24.760 Quebec, we were the bottom of the list. And what I concluded from that is Ottawa really reflects
00:11:30.240 Quebec more than it does Ontario, which is interesting. That was the first story I wanted
00:11:35.040 to tell. The second story I wanted to tell is that in discussions of all this stuff, I was
00:11:39.920 talking to a friend of mine who was from New Brunswick, and she was telling me about aquaculture.
00:11:45.240 so not agriculture but aquaculture and she said that there is an incredible it's like the potential
00:11:52.380 that oil has for Alberta aquaculture has for New Brunswick but the problem is is that's a federal
00:11:58.440 jurisdiction and you know you so you have to go to Ottawa to get anything done and Ottawa is just
00:12:04.280 no the word we're the department of fisheries we're not the department of aquaculture and so
00:12:08.620 they just can't get anything and they're incredibly frustrated with that division of labor so the
00:12:13.840 The simple reality is that in our own sort of way, right across the country, we have these problems that we're not addressing very well.
00:12:23.420 And as you said, we all have our micro view of our relationship with Ottawa, and it turns out we have a lot of commonality, but only in Alberta are we saying we can fix this somehow.
00:12:34.520 Well, I mean, Alberta's not the first and not the only province to have a separatist movement.
00:12:40.840 Yeah. And I think the other thing is there's also a lot of challenges between provinces. So at one point in my career, I was the editor of the Atlantic Chamber Journal, which is the magazine for the Atlantic provinces chambers of commerce. And the really big discussion then was the trade barriers between Atlantic provinces. Well, that is still the biggest topic of discussion. And it does a long time ago. We won't have to get into exactly how long ago it was, but it was quite a while ago that I was doing that job.
00:13:08.120 so again those kinds of you know there's there is we're not alone in seeing these problems
00:13:15.400 um we're not alone in trying to address these problems um the question is is this the right
00:13:21.720 way to address these problems well if i may that was the uh an example of that was the como case
00:13:27.960 uh where uh the guy from new brunswick uh went across the line into quebec but i think he
00:13:34.120 He bought nine cases of beer and I think three 36s or 326s, sorry, and brought it back.
00:13:42.000 They got caught, you know, police pulled him over, gave him a $294 ticket.
00:13:46.560 And he took it all the way up to the Supreme Court.
00:13:48.960 And it was supported by the Free Trade Association, people saying, you know, we need to have free trade.
00:13:54.560 It's in the Constitution of 1867.
00:13:57.120 Why don't we have it?
00:13:58.940 So New Brunswick defended.
00:14:00.880 Quebec enjoined.
00:14:02.140 The federal government enjoined.
00:14:03.280 ontario enjoying everyone said no we can't have free trade in this country can't we can't allow
00:14:07.920 people to take beer across provincial lines and it always comes down to booze doesn't it
00:14:15.680 i have some okanagan wine in my trunk just go the speed limit wait let's not get pulled over
00:14:22.240 i you know but there are a lot of things like that and i think that kind of question of like
00:14:27.920 again that jurisdiction part of the reason that booze is the problem is because that
00:14:31.280 has provincial jurisdiction and there's and there's tax money associated with it so you can't
00:14:35.680 take it across the border because then you didn't pay taxes on it and that's often what it is at the
00:14:39.840 end of the day well unfortunately it's vested interest yeah and that's that's the fundamental
00:14:44.640 problem and that's why here on a nation of people what we've been saying is there's certain problems
00:14:48.800 in this country the politicians just can't fix and so we the people need to step up and fix those
00:14:54.640 problems because you know they're they they they sign documents that say we're going to do free
00:14:59.520 trade that you know they do all this stuff you know we have the new west free trade agreement
00:15:03.680 but you know there's still resistance because of the bureaucracy because of vested interest
00:15:08.400 and that's where we say because of lobbying like i think that's one of the challenges too is that
00:15:12.800 often it's not that politicians can't do it it's that they won't do it there's not enough political
00:15:16.640 capital to do the thing that they know is right and that they know that people want but that
00:15:22.000 sometimes industry doesn't want and they don't take the risk yeah because that person with a
00:15:26.960 vested interest is going to go put a bunch of money into digging up dirt on me or whatever
00:15:31.360 so they don't take the political risk and that's part of why politicians can't deliver what we
00:15:36.800 really need in this country and that's we argue that's why we the you know we as the people of
00:15:42.160 the country that demand and want free trade we have to we have to put it in our in our constitution
00:15:48.880 legitimately and we have to have an enforcement and that's uh we talked about uh enforcement
00:15:53.600 guilds if you will and one of them was free trade so and and you know frankly i think it's
00:15:58.560 it's got to have we have to have a system where people can enforce it because the politicians
00:16:02.800 just won't and it's not their fault it's there's just a natural motivation to not do it well we
00:16:10.080 certainly have inter-provincial trade barriers and we've been talking a lot about that especially
00:16:13.600 with what is happening out of the us now that's at looking at everything at a national scale but
00:16:18.160 really for like 20 years now you've been deep dive in calgary yes so in the circles that you run in
00:16:23.840 just to bring it back home a little bit in the circles that you run in um what's their sense of
00:16:29.600 like what what are they saying about the separation referendum about the separatists what are you
00:16:33.600 hearing i mean i think it's there's a couple things that are really interesting is in the
00:16:38.480 circles that i run in people don't really want to talk about it too much it seems like a people are
00:16:44.800 seemed very hesitant to raise it um and i think that's for a number of reasons one is
00:16:52.320 there's no movement for status quo right like you're not like i'm like i'm pro nothing right
00:16:59.760 so it's there's hard to get passionate about that um and so then there was a really big lag
00:17:05.680 in the discussion where people the people who wanted to talk about it were the people who
00:17:09.040 wanted change which makes sense um and i think a lot of that sentiment is outside of the city i
00:17:17.280 don't think a lot of it is inside the city and i think then by the time people were willing to
00:17:24.240 talk about it there was so much emotion tied to it that it was it became hard to have discussion so
00:17:30.240 again it was like we don't talk about this in polite company kind of feeling so i i would say i
00:17:34.960 In the communities that I travel in, there's not a lot of discussion about this and people seem quite hesitant until they think that they know what you think, but they don't want to say anything until they already know what you think, which makes it hard to have a conversation.
00:17:53.500 That sounds very Canadian of us.
00:17:55.660 I mean, I think there's other things that are less like that, but I think, again, it's touchy and it's hard.
00:18:04.460 And I think part of the reason that it's hard is that there's a lot of people who are like, I just don't want to get this.
00:18:10.480 I don't want this either side of it to get in the way of getting things done.
00:18:16.200 I don't want the discussion, no matter what my opinion is, I don't want this to be a barrier to a continued relationship with a person or a company or a politician.
00:18:29.020 I just don't want to, no matter what, I don't want my opinion of this to ruin my relationship and my ability to get business done.
00:18:37.580 Well, that's valid.
00:18:38.460 And so would you say they're experiencing it as more of an irritant than a question that really needs to be answered or just like it's hard to tell?
00:18:46.640 I mean, we're asking you what other people think.
00:18:48.380 You're asking me what other people think.
00:18:49.680 And my basic answer is no one wants to see what they think.
00:18:52.800 I guess what I find out.
00:18:53.980 The other part of it is I think that I would say yes, that for a lot of the people that I deal with, their main thing is this seems like a distraction.
00:19:05.380 This is getting in the way of conversations we need to have.
00:19:09.300 We're having this conversation instead.
00:19:11.580 And this wasn't on my agenda of conversations to have.
00:19:15.260 If I can jump in, there's just some statistics on it.
00:19:18.040 that back in January of 26, and this was, I believe it was Abacus,
00:19:24.140 29% of Albertans said that they were either definitely going to vote to leave
00:19:32.500 or were leaning in that direction.
00:19:34.860 And then the number has slipped a little bit.
00:19:37.340 So that now across the province, only 24%.
00:19:40.580 So we went from 29 to 24.
00:19:42.300 So there's a bit of a slip there.
00:19:44.860 The stay category is at 64.
00:19:48.040 as of September. And you're absolutely right that in Calgary, the number is about 18 percent
00:19:55.180 and Edmonton is about 16 percent. So there's definitely more rural lean towards the leave
00:20:02.140 side versus Calgary and Edmonton. And that makes sense to me. You know, again, the primary divide
00:20:10.220 across the country is urban rural. It's not province to province. And I've seen some interesting
00:20:16.240 polling indicating that not only for the the separation referendum question but for the other
00:20:21.360 questions there's actually more support in other provinces for those other ideas than there is in
00:20:26.400 alberta so there's some interesting pieces there of this idea that where is the divide because the
00:20:33.840 divide is real and the the challenge is that it's not to say that even the people who are like no
00:20:41.440 we're staying firmly in we're in we're here to stay status quo doesn't mean we're not being asked
00:20:48.800 are there problems that's right we're just being asked is this the singular solution to that those
00:20:55.040 problems that's correct well and and what's interesting you talk about people not wanting
00:20:59.360 to talk about it part of it is they're very entrenched in their ideas so 90 of people by
00:21:03.920 the same survey uh on the on the stay side 90 are saying that's definite i don't want to talk about
00:21:10.400 it anymore that's what i'm doing what's interesting on the leave side only 70 percent uh are committed
00:21:16.640 to that that that decision and that's probably some of the slippage that we've seen yeah so uh
00:21:22.080 you know so people are entrenched they know what they they know what they know and and and they
00:21:27.200 don't really need to talk about it and uh and then they're established so changing minds on this is
00:21:32.480 difficult it's a polarizing issue it's a all-or-nothing kind of a scenario which is i think
00:21:38.480 you know when we get into that polarization that black and white kind of that is when it's hard to
00:21:43.040 change people's minds i think it's also a little bit challenging because you're not talking about
00:21:48.240 you're not really talking about stay or leave you're talking about stay or keep talking about
00:21:53.600 it sorry and there's a lot of people who are like oh like i don't again yeah people already
00:22:01.040 don't want to talk about it and so being asked do you want to keep talking about it they're like
00:22:04.160 no I'm so tired of this conversation and I think that that is a very challenging
00:22:12.740 position to say would you like to have further many years of uncertainty right
00:22:18.260 there's few people who are like yes I'm I would love more uncertainty I don't
00:22:23.600 have enough uncertainty in my life right now I would like to add to business
00:22:27.320 uncertainty real estate uncertainty and just general my place in the world
00:22:31.700 world uncertainty let's go that way yeah make things more complicated out a little splash of
00:22:35.420 drama or a lot of it yeah so i think in order to be pro let's keep talking about this you have to
00:22:42.560 be really committed to wanting to keep talking about it and so it's not even it's not as simple
00:22:48.100 as stay or leave yeah agreed uh and also what i'm wondering is so there's you get you do get the two
00:22:54.580 sides that are really committed to their position and what i'm wondering though is does the center
00:23:00.500 the people that are maybe just a little bit busy with other things but were they asked would they
00:23:05.320 at least agree that there's issues that there are things we need to work on i mean i think that's
00:23:11.020 what's challenging is that's not what is being asked and so again if you're being asked high
00:23:17.780 risk option or what you already know what you already know like that sounds good even if you're
00:23:28.480 like are there problems with what i already know but that's not what you're being asked you're not
00:23:31.940 being asked are there problems with the relationship between the province and the
00:23:36.560 federal government and between the province and other provinces i don't i suspect that if that
00:23:42.280 was the question most people would say yeah there are some significant problems with the provincial
00:23:48.480 federal relationship and between the inter-provincial relationships you know we just
00:23:53.940 we just mentioned interprovincial trade.
00:23:56.480 That's just one example.
00:23:58.000 Well, in fact, around 60% of the people agree by survey
00:24:01.380 that if Alberta had more power, this whole issue would go away.
00:24:05.420 And we'd get back to worrying about the bigger issues.
00:24:07.580 The other thing I want to point out is that, you know,
00:24:10.160 when we started this process, was it a year ago, further back?
00:24:14.180 I mean, I've been dealing with alienation forever.
00:24:17.040 But when we started this particular process,
00:24:19.280 it was a different world than it is now.
00:24:20.760 and you know that the upheaval that comes out of the United States I mean
00:24:24.600 they've the Trump administration has totally upturned the world order and so there's so much
00:24:31.400 risk associated with that and I think that issue of risk has floated down to how people feel about
00:24:37.660 this particular issue at this particular time. Well and I think the other thing that has floated
00:24:43.160 is that piece of feeling like okay the Trump administration is it specifically that they are
00:24:48.940 trying to create uncertainty? Are they trying to create an environment of, is that the outcome
00:24:54.940 that they're looking for? And so then I think there are some people who are like, is that what
00:24:58.880 this referendum is about as well as creating manufacturing uncertainty? And so I think that
00:25:06.400 puts a different level on it for some people too. So, you know, most people and most businesses
00:25:12.680 don't want more uncertainty and so when it looks like someone's trying to engender that
00:25:20.360 i think people become suspicious well i think part of part of our issue is that um
00:25:25.900 the stay in the leave side also interpret what is happening in the united states differently yes
00:25:31.740 and you know and and i've got statistics in here that um that show that the the leave side
00:25:39.420 you know they're asked a question
00:25:42.280 I'll read it to you
00:25:45.260 if an independent Alberta
00:25:46.400 joined the United States
00:25:47.580 would this be a good thing
00:25:49.360 or a bad thing
00:25:49.980 and the definitely leave
00:25:53.960 is 51% say that
00:25:56.060 that would either be a good thing
00:25:57.160 or a very good thing
00:25:58.000 51%
00:25:59.340 whereas the opposite end
00:26:01.280 the definitively stay
00:26:03.520 that little sliver
00:26:05.460 doesn't even show up
00:26:06.480 60
00:26:07.140 80% say that would be a bad thing
00:26:09.400 thing yeah and so that's an emerging divide between those two points of discussion and so
00:26:15.420 to your point about people don't want to talk about it they don't actually want to get into
00:26:18.540 that conversation either yeah so and and the problem with that is that if the leave side
00:26:26.480 gets tagged as being pro-american that is really problematic and it's problematic for those people
00:26:33.740 that that are saying well there are problems is this a way to solve it by voting to continue the
00:26:39.220 conversation, suddenly that whole, you know, we call alienation discussion of the alienation
00:26:46.140 project, does that get tainted by the, you know, the separatists, you know, the heavy
00:26:53.920 lean side?
00:26:54.660 I mean, we've been talking about Western alienation as long as I've been alive.
00:27:00.420 This is not new.
00:27:01.440 We know what, you know, that's a phrase that resonates so much that you don't have to say,
00:27:07.020 well, what do you mean by Western alienation?
00:27:08.180 Everybody knows what you're talking about. And so I don't think there's any I don't think there's a lot of chance that Western alienation goes away on either sense in the sense that I don't think that alienation is going to stop no matter what comes out of this referendum.
00:27:28.560 the feeling that we're no one is paying attention to the needs of this province but i also don't
00:27:34.800 think that it will stop the movement to address western alienation from within this province
00:27:41.360 so i i'm not as concerned as you about that element that this tars everyone with one you know
00:27:47.600 we all get tired of the same kind of thing i think that i think that it hopefully indicates
00:27:57.760 there are significant challenges here and you can't work through those challenges if you just
00:28:06.080 say well i'm taking my ball and i'm going home right what did you say earlier about divorce
00:28:10.640 yeah well i mean i didn't want that for supper let's have a divorce yeah like i mean i think
00:28:15.600 that's around the question of like you know there are harms of asking the question right you know
00:28:22.720 this idea that well there's no harm asking there is often and this is not the only case but this is
00:28:27.600 a case of there is a harm of asking there is a harm of asking and my analogy which is not a
00:28:32.960 perfect analogy is if you don't want to get a divorce don't float it right like that's doesn't
00:28:39.360 help the situation now you tell me yeah yeah yeah um but i think that question too of like
00:28:47.680 if we've we're at this point we have asked the question we are asked we are in the process of
00:28:52.480 asking the question where do we go from here we don't have the answer yet but we have a sense of
00:28:57.600 what the answer is probably going to be from this side what's how does that come across to the other
00:29:06.560 partners in this marriage right and and i i actually like what you said earlier about this
00:29:12.080 is the wrong question so we're not asking the question about how do we fix the relationship
00:29:17.520 between alberta and in fact all of the provinces and the federal government instead of asking that
00:29:23.520 question we're asking the very hard question about we want to leave and and so uh and and
00:29:29.840 in this national nation of people podcast we're going to be talking about strategically what is
00:29:35.280 the right question and how do we transition from this i'm out of here i'm talking up my bag and
00:29:41.040 going yeah you know going home somewhere else to let's work it out how do we how do we actually get
00:29:47.200 there and well and and is there agreement on what the problems are because i'm not sure i don't know
00:29:54.000 if there is agreement within alberta on what are the primary problems are they socks on the floor
00:29:59.600 like are they small problems or are they big fundamental problems is it i didn't like dinner
00:30:04.960 or is it i fundamentally feel like there is a lack of respect those are different types
00:30:10.400 of problem in the relationship and i'm not sure that there is agreement within alberta of what
00:30:18.160 are the problems let alone what are the solutions i think that you were right when you said that
00:30:22.800 in alberta we make the mistake of of taking the the uh the attitude of the ottawa elite particularly
00:30:30.560 the liberal party and then trans trans you know transmuting that all over the country and saying
00:30:35.600 that's how everybody and as evidenced by the survey that i talked about that's not what's
00:30:39.680 happening that albertans are actually well respected right across the country and so it's
00:30:44.560 amazing that you know people in new brunswick view us as i think we were number two in the in the
00:30:50.720 friendly provinces you know that's amazing and it's because there's so many people from there
00:30:55.040 getting jobs here and well they're getting jobs here and they do business here like alberta gets
00:31:01.040 stuff done and we get stuff done with all sorts of people um and that's great let's not lose that in
00:31:09.440 a discussion about what are the very real challenges facing this province and business
00:31:15.040 here and the relationships and that's part of us asking the audience to think strategically
00:31:20.480 because right now as we said you know that the proponents they're not necessarily thinking of
00:31:25.040 the long term they're just thinking of there's a there's a there's a there's a finish line there
00:31:28.480 we got to get across that finish line yeah and so we as the citizens we need to think for ourselves
00:31:33.920 and think strategically and say okay what are the problems and maybe start having those discussions
00:31:38.320 instead of just saying, I don't want to talk to that person, you know, just to say, what are the
00:31:42.260 problems and how would we actually do that? And we've had a number of episodes where we actually
00:31:45.980 talk about like the transfer payments. We actually talk about solutions and they're not that far
00:31:52.280 away. You know, we talk about unemployment insurance. Well, if we, as an example, if we
00:31:57.720 were to vote against the constitution and restarted that, well, we can take, we have the full right
00:32:04.760 The Supreme Court decided it. That's a provincial jurisdiction. We gave it up, and then the 82 Constitution, we take it back, and that's $5 billion that will come back to Alberta.
00:32:14.880 You know, put that into health care. That's something that people can actually get and feel and benefit from.
00:32:19.680 And just because I want to, you know, show all the angles of the conversation that we're having, I think from the viewpoint of the people that want to separate right now, that it's that they have been sort of raising their hand, being like, hey, we have a problem.
00:32:36.760 Hey, we have a problem. And it's been like ignored by the federal government, by Ottawa, certainly over the last 10 years or so.
00:32:45.460 So I do think that a lot of people out there might be feeling like they've done a lot to express what their concerns are.
00:32:53.040 But what seems apparent to me is just in the day-to-day-ness of most people's lives, we actually haven't done that job very well even with our neighbours.
00:33:03.180 And maybe in Calgary proper, where we've brought everyone on board to define what is the problem and why is it so important that we deal with it right now and in this way.
00:33:14.740 I mean, I think that most people in the day-to-day running of their lives, I don't think this is a controversial statement, don't think about the Constitution at all.
00:33:27.860 Right?
00:33:28.540 Like, I don't think.
00:33:29.240 Some people don't even know we have a Constitution.
00:33:31.260 And so I think that kind of question of, like, what are people actually worried about in their day-to-day lives, it is not transfer payments.
00:33:41.120 It is not the administration of EI.
00:33:43.700 It is right. There is a very particular time in their life where they might be worried about that. And, you know, they're usually at that time more focused on like, how do I pay my mortgage? Then what is the administrative setup of the AI payments? Right. So again, it's I think the vast majority of people are just like, just make it easier for me to do things.
00:34:07.960 i want politicians and bureaucrats to make my life easy i want it to be easy to get my garbage picked
00:34:16.120 up i want it to be easy to send my kids to school i want it to be easy to go to the hospital i want
00:34:21.560 it to be easy to get my passport you guys figure it out but if i may though the our our sort of
00:34:30.360 back of our mind thinking isn't balanced either so you know for example we have over our history
00:34:37.080 had some significant successes in changing the, you know,
00:34:40.860 changing the political structure, the constitutional structure, call it that.
00:34:44.740 And the two that I think of as number one, in 1931,
00:34:48.040 we actually got resources, which we did not have
00:34:51.000 when we were first, the Resource Transfer Act in 1931.
00:34:56.460 You know, we didn't have that in 1905 when it became.
00:34:59.440 The one that I was involved with directly was the crow rates.
00:35:02.620 that there were preferential rates that basically pushed us to to take our agricultural products and
00:35:10.400 ship them in raw form to southern Ontario get processed and then shipped back so we got the
00:35:14.900 Kellogg's cornflakes back from our own corn next door I mean it was crazy but we got that fixed
00:35:20.700 and there's been a whole bunch of other things now we argue in on this show that that kind of
00:35:24.900 stopped because of the 82 constitution but we did have successes and we could have more successes
00:35:30.960 if we weren't if we didn't have this legal binding thing that we didn't even agree to
00:35:35.600 and so that's probably yeah and just in case uh just so that we also make sure we cover everything
00:35:42.500 yes that we were looking to cover as far as statistics go because there's lots of reasons
00:35:46.420 why yeah you know we got here and uh you know it is important i think to think to think about what
00:35:51.260 our neighbors care about especially at a time when you're trying to win votes are there any
00:35:55.340 more statistics you want to go over today randy well i think to your point that you know people
00:36:00.260 view it from a very personal perspective and the the um you know 44 percent um of households feel
00:36:07.640 that if we were to separate their household economics would be worse and that then so they
00:36:13.020 they that's that's a big negative thing um you know they also look at uh at the risk factor going
00:36:19.600 up uh you know they there's one incredible statistic that i found that uh actually frankly
00:36:26.660 scared me a little bit and the question that was asked was uh in an independent alberta uh would
00:36:33.220 the u.s compel alberta to join uh to join the united states and this so this is basically the
00:36:41.060 fear and 73 percent felt that the united states would use political means to force us to join them
00:36:48.500 77 percent said they would use economic means and which I found astonishing 57 percent of people
00:36:58.080 believed that they would use military means and I mean I think that's part of the question right
00:37:04.420 is is the idea that if Alberta was independent would it become part of the U.S. and and there
00:37:10.860 are varying views on yes or no but also is that good or is that bad and I think part of the question
00:37:15.860 is well so if alberta becomes part of the u.s does it become texas or does it become puerto rico or
00:37:21.620 does it become venezuela exactly and those are three very different outcomes don't forget cuba
00:37:28.500 yeah well they're not yet part of us like venice that okay you you technically are your own but
00:37:35.380 we're gonna control your oil right right so there are there are different views on what that might
00:37:42.660 what that would be most likely to look like and that that is that now we're operating in the space
00:37:48.740 of fear and conjecture not within the spaces of facts right you're so a lot of these statistics
00:37:55.860 are yes they're just statistics on what do people feel right and that's a changing that's a changing
00:38:04.820 space but that's but that's risk oh absolutely and that fear and that belief changes what you
00:38:11.140 think is the best path forward exactly and i so i'm proposing that the external increase in risk
00:38:17.940 through you know how the united states has changed they're a different approach i mean
00:38:21.940 we were talking about a moment ago that uh you know in in trump's uh uh speech at the united
00:38:27.220 nations now i know he throws out statistics that don't make any sense but he said that he controls
00:38:32.100 60 of the world's oil and if you do if you run the numbers that's basically well he's invaded it
00:38:39.540 you know took over venezuela actually took 65 billion barrels uh he is 100 years yeah exactly
00:38:47.460 so they should be able to get rid of all that uh you know he started bombing iran which is
00:38:52.420 i think iran is number three in terms of total reserves he's got a cushy relationship with
00:38:57.620 saudi arabia they're number two and guess who's number four and so in his 60 he's including us
00:39:05.140 already in his mind well and iran and there's a few yeah there's a few pieces there that aren't
00:39:10.500 so again i think all of these things are the context of this discussion in alberta
00:39:16.740 um and the question is how do they change how people view but also and then what and then what
00:39:25.300 um that's really to me and to a lot of people that i talk to
00:39:30.020 they're less focused on october 19th and they're more focused on october 20th what happens after
00:39:39.340 this notwithstanding that it may take a long time to count these votes because we don't have enough
00:39:43.000 people counting but um you know what happens next is really i think where a lot of people are
00:39:49.480 focused and that's all in a context that there is a solid majority of people that recognize that
00:39:57.260 there is a problem and and and inherently in that point is that we're asking the wrong question
00:40:03.460 so that's what we're actually going to be talking about on our next episode of a nation of people
00:40:08.620 and i look forward to it and thank you so much kata for your time today and for being willing to
00:40:14.040 sort of cross the the the polarization spheres to have conversations with people that might have
00:40:20.240 different views like it's just so um courageous and open-hearted of you to come here and and and
00:40:25.300 you know, share what your experience of Calgary is in the middle and the majority of people.
00:40:30.320 I think that that's a two-way street, right? That kind of idea of like, I do not have a background
00:40:35.800 in constitutional law. I don't understand a lot of the context, but I think that that area of
00:40:46.060 feeling and this is just such a beautiful province and such a fantastic city and wonderful people do
00:40:55.120 our best when we are optimistic about the future and i hope that whatever comes out whatever happens
00:41:00.640 on october 20th we maintain that optimism about our ability to fix problems so we've had this
00:41:06.400 conversation today here at nation of people so that you don't have to do that at home
00:41:10.240 so you can just have you'll sit side by side in the car and just talk about other things
00:41:15.760 thank you again thank you very much alberta's strong activist voices can be catalysts for 0.58
00:41:22.320 change. Rather than choosing a hill to die upon, maybe there's an opportunity here to think
00:41:27.960 strategically. This province has historically found middle ground solutions that unify Albertans and
00:41:34.400 also fix problems. So what is a middle ground solution? And what is the dead fish, the change
00:41:41.220 of topic that we can throw on the table that sort of stops all of the back and forth and gets
00:41:46.720 everybody to focus? What's the reward? How can we unify Alberta to fix Canada?
00:41:52.320 that is the topic for the next episode join us at a nation of people for a proposed action plan
00:41:58.160 and be prepared to share it with your friends