00:00:21.500It tends to be a more strategic approach.
00:00:24.280I like to call it the bourbon and Harley-Davidson's approach.
00:00:28.760So you tariff us on things that are sensitive to us.
00:00:33.520We tariff you on other things, not necessarily pork for pork, but you're really protective about your bourbon and your Harley Davidson.
00:00:43.000These are iconic items that you like to export.
00:00:47.220And particularly, these are things that are produced in Republican states or if it's a Biden government in Democrat states.
00:00:54.540So it's a more strategic approach of equivalency, not a straight up one for one or A for A.
00:01:01.220What we saw here was something of a hybrid of two approaches.
00:01:05.380First, Canada's retaliatory tariffs were all drawn from the basket of goods that the U.S. just tariffed.
00:01:12.680But within that basket, they were strategically selected.
00:01:17.200So, for example, flatware, cutlery from New York State.
00:01:21.500Why? Because there's a big plant and Canada is a big importer of their stuff. My flat where Oneida is made by this New York state plant. Seafood from Maine, another swing state. We've got midterm elections coming up in the States. So it's not one for one, A for A, tit for tat, but it is selective within there to try to maximize the political pressure on Trump allies.
00:01:49.500allies. So if they want to win New York, if they want to win Maine, if they want to win other swing
00:01:54.720states, we want to inflict a little bit of economic pain on the ground so that their congressmen,
00:02:00.020their senators, their governors start to complain to Trump saying, you know, ease up, give this a