00:04:59.760And he started his own streaming show.
00:05:02.060I believe it's on at the same time right now.
00:05:03.700But I mean, he comes from strongly left of center. But again, if you scare and tweak your media bosses, you're going to find yourself pressured to leave or pressured to shut up. So the remaining ones in conventional media, unfortunately, are often restrained and quiet and they're somewhat shut up, which again makes it for boring and it's not going to expose and dig into these important issues that we really need to.
00:05:28.860So today I'm going to have a couple of guests on.
00:05:32.140At the top of the hour, I'm going to have Franco Teresano of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.
00:05:42.860Not everybody viewing and listening is from Calgary, but you will, I think people can relate.
00:05:48.880I mean, there's something with municipal politics.
00:05:50.540Some of the most crazy and irresponsible politicians managed to get through the mix.
00:05:56.040You know, it's something I've discussed for a long time.
00:05:58.860People don't like partisan politics, the tribalism that comes with being in a party and some of that stuff. It's fair enough. It leads to some ugly politics at times.
00:06:12.720But the problem with nonpartisan politics, as we see in municipal politics, is people slide through the radar. They'll campaign on one thing and govern on another because you never had that filter. You never had nominations.
00:06:23.600you'd never had a full election race or a brand attached to them to be able to see what they
00:06:29.220actually might be talking about. I see Cindy here has said, you know, since I want to bring up
00:06:37.500comments as people can put them in, the UN drip, which is the declaration on indigenous peoples,
00:06:44.420I believe. That is a huge, dangerous policy area. And it's one, there's nothing that terrifies
00:06:51.620politicians or media more than talking about native issues i mean those are frightening yet
00:06:56.420there was that we desperately need to address i mean our system when it comes to first nations
00:07:02.340is failing i mean these people are are living in misery uh by every measure health education0.99
00:07:08.660crime life expectancy it's a disaster yet always the only acceptable answer to deal with appears
00:07:15.940to be just to pour more money at it and then you know and to do more of these things to try and0.69
00:07:20.020and actually separate and add to this apartheid within our country, which is what the reserve
00:07:24.120system is. So the UN declaration, and there is a federal bill, I don't know what it is, C215 or
00:07:29.640something like that, that is looking to, or no, it's a smaller number. It's not a private
00:07:34.100member's bill. It's C15. Somebody might correct me on that. But there is a move to really entrench
00:07:41.320that UN declaration, which if you read it, boy, we're never going to get any resources developed
00:07:45.540ever again well we might already be in that position if if we put that in uh and now cheryl's
00:07:50.820asking uh whether kenny will loosen restrictions today and yeah that's a very good question and
00:07:58.740and that's one of the things i definitely want to talk about because it's this is the day it's
00:08:04.820another three weeks we should be on to phase three but it seems the provincial government is always
00:08:09.460kicking and screaming we meet our own benchmarks but they'll always move the goal posts make an
00:08:14.900excuse and kick the reopening down the road a little farther uh something that was interesting
00:08:20.020this morning i'm going to try this screen sharing here so for those who can read it and i'll read
00:08:24.260it out because some people will be just listening to audio uh drew barnes this morning posted on
00:08:28.020facebook saying step three of the benchmark has been achieved some time ago and he's asking that
00:08:34.420the government honor the commitment of easing items laid out in the step three reopening graph
00:08:39.540uh he said albertans are well informed citizenry capable of exercising personal responsibility for
00:08:43.860themselves and others the cornerstone of a democratic society such as ours is that persons
00:08:48.500within the democracy exercise rights and responsible responsibilities with the least1.00
00:08:53.780government interference possible isn't that refreshing to hear from an mla and uh yes drew
00:09:00.580has certainly been uh giving premier kennedy some some uh gray hairs i think sometimes with his
00:09:07.540outspoken nature but people appreciate it uh and and we need somebody to speak up because we have
00:09:14.100hit the benchmarks so let's talk about it why to be honest i don't think they're going to open that's
00:09:20.580my thoughts i hope to be wrong uh we're seeing a number of hospitalizations starting to rise a
00:09:27.540little bit i mean they're not they're still well under the the benchmark that the government set
00:09:32.740but they're starting to rise and that's that's what they'll say is they'll say oh yeah but look
00:09:37.140at the trending we can't uh pardon me i'm just trying to get better at the screen sharing
00:09:43.620we can't do the reopening right now because we're going to be over 300 within a week and oh the
00:09:48.340variance the variance the variance that's the latest of the uh fear-mongering predictions is
00:09:53.540the variants are going to wipe us all out and we'll be in trouble so here i do have this is what
00:10:01.540step three is supposed to look like we have and then they do cover their butts a little bit and
00:10:05.780and they say potential. So potential easing with adult team sports, casinos, racing centers,
00:10:11.680and bingo halls. Now these are areas, remember that these employ thousands of people that have
00:10:15.440been unemployed for a long time. And then people say, oh, they could just get CERB and others.
00:10:20.940We're borrowing ourselves to oblivion. Not to mention it's unhealthy being restricted and
00:10:25.760locked up like this. We need to move ahead. So we've got the casinos, youth sport, further easing,
00:10:31.720indoor social gatherings with restrictions. Now, you know, that could mean a heck of a lot of things.
00:10:39.180Indoor seated events, movie theaters, auditoriums, museums, art galleries, zoos, interpretive centers.
00:10:44.180It would be nice to get out just for a day trip to a museum again. I mean, we can't cross the
00:10:47.820bloody border. And of course, at the bottom, it says places of worship. And that one doesn't even,
00:10:52.160you know, have that with restrictions or anything, though I imagine there would be some if they open,
00:10:56.660But that's been a big one. Danielle Smith spoke to Erin Coates, the wife of James Coates, who was arrested and was in jail. I believe he still is. That's something that Dave Naylor, our news guy, has told me. Actually, he will give me an update if it happens during the show. We're watching for if Pastor Coates gets bail, and I will let you know at that time.
00:11:22.520So will these happen? And then we've got Pat Ollenberger says, 300 is an arbitrary number.
00:11:28.280Yeah, probably is. But you know, that's been a trend for this entire bloody COVID thing. It
00:11:34.840seems everything's arbitrary, isn't it? I mean, they toss out numbers, they toss out goalposts,
00:11:39.320and they move them on a whim, it seems like. They don't seem to know what they're doing,
00:11:44.840and that really doesn't help with our confidence. Why don't I restrict myself,
00:11:48.920potentially bankrupt myself when you guys don't seem to actually know what you're talking about
00:11:56.120this is a frightening sort of thing so i'll show here here's some projections due to when they were
00:12:01.640fear-mongering on the uh the variant of course the dreaded variant and uh they were this was
00:12:08.280from january 25th now i guess this started uh this was supposed to be after 250 variant cases
00:12:14.200were identified we were supposed to see this explosion and trend and uh they believed even
00:12:20.360you know without the variants as you can see with the lower course we should have 1073 hospitalizations
00:12:25.400we're about 270 right now i believe uh and with this dreaded variant we should be sitting around
00:12:31.4003611 again that's well over 10 times what the reality is this is the modeling these guys
00:12:40.120base their policy on so how are we supposed to trust them their models are crap i mean if
00:12:45.320you can't project accurately but what good is are these arbitrary restrictions things
00:12:50.920cheryl dawn's pointing out gyms should be essential for healthier uh health lifestyles
00:12:55.800and mentally and so on i mean we do need i mean you gotta look at the bigger picture it's not
00:13:01.160just getting in shape it's good for your mental health when you've had a good workout here's the
00:13:04.600ICU admissions. Again, with the dreaded variant, we should be getting into the 800 people in ICU
00:13:12.680range. As I said, I believe it's 46. And with regular, it should be over 200. Again, 46.
00:13:23.160So these predictions are garbage, but we're modeling our policy based on them and we're
00:13:29.480losing and that's what gets people to believe as chris uh is saying there that the whole thing's a
00:13:34.920scam uh ray anderson saying yeah but they'll say the lockdown's worked and that's true and it's
00:13:42.760it's frustrating and it's painful because then you're forced into this proving a negative
00:13:46.760you know but the the great thing is we've got control groups out there texas and mississippi
00:13:52.840they reopened they got rid of all the restrictions that's it get out don't wear a mask go to the
00:13:58.160store play sports have fun live a life and guess what they're fine it didn't explode there's not
00:14:06.420the mass plague it didn't take over texas and mississippi i mean these guys i got their stats
00:14:12.620here they didn't change a bit so what's your excuse guys i mean that's a lot of what we see
00:14:18.320you know their stats are the same as california uh california's kept some of the strongest
00:14:23.700restrictions in the country like whatever is impacting the the spread of COVID it's lockdowns
00:14:32.000really have a negligible impact on them at best but that doesn't stop governments from doing it
00:14:36.620as other people said though here's here's Mississippi that trend is dropping right down
00:14:41.620I mean it should be spiking you know they predicted the end of the world heck Stephen
00:14:45.340King jumped in and said Texas was being irresponsible well if Stephen King said so
00:14:49.020how could we argue with that and you know fine he's an author with a political point of view
00:14:54.860we can dismiss that but we've got our yes supposed medical experts going on about these
00:15:00.780these restrictions and saying that we've got to do this and they aren't working so will we see today
00:15:07.240an easing of restrictions or will they make more excuses and i hate to say that i'm expecting more
00:15:12.640excuses as other people are saying i'm so done with masks i had a person uh you know twitter
00:15:17.900is a sick, weird little world, but I did have a person coming after me on my playground on Twitter
00:15:23.200there saying that she actually does want to see masks mandated for every flu season. So even once
00:15:31.300this is behind us, because there is a flu season every year and it does kill vulnerable people
00:15:36.420every year. So she feels we should just wear them every year. This crazed zero risk mentality we've
00:15:43.760gotten into. We've got to tell these people to go to hell. It's enough. We've got to push back.
00:15:47.880I'm not saying I want your great-grandmama to die, but we just can't keep moving on,
00:15:54.480perpetually shutting things down. I mean, the economic fallout really hasn't even been going
00:15:59.300to hit us yet, and it's going to be brutal when it does. Mark Cooper, discussing getting Albertans
00:16:07.240back to work at the oil field, administer energy and AER, pushing for big operators going forward,
00:16:12.540and he's got an interview suggestion. Yeah, the energy sector, I mean, that's another
00:16:17.720giant issue. We got a lot to cover in upcoming shows. So I do appreciate the suggestions because
00:16:22.840we really want to keep talking on important things. The energy sector, so we're seeing
00:16:28.140world oil demand rising. It's getting stronger. World needs it. They're recovering and we're
00:16:34.920shut in. Alberta is an investment pariah because we've got a prime minister who wants to shut in
00:16:41.700well. We've got an American neighbor now who's shut down the Keystone XL expansion. We got
00:16:49.140Gretchen Whitmer looking to shut down line five, which she's quite tightly aligned with Biden,0.79
00:16:54.980so I imagine she'll get it her way. Now we've got that old chrome there, Jane Fonda. She was out1.00
00:17:01.060opposing line three, which crosses the border. So I mean, they're shutting down our lines one
00:17:04.420by one they're picking them off and uh we have to what the hell is that western standard put a
00:17:15.140comment i'm not sure how that would happen but yes we we definitely have have to get things changed
00:17:23.620we've got to get to tide water we've got to get to other options uh that's one of the things i
00:17:27.220i believe clinton devoe who i'm going to be speaking to later on about the conservative
00:17:30.820tax on things. He was talking about the Hudson's Bay option. We had a presentation on that last
00:17:35.820weekend at a suits and boots conference that I hosted as well. Let's get that Trans Mountain
00:17:40.860done. That thing seems to be stalled and dead in the water. What's going on there? Energy East,
00:17:47.160perhaps. I mean, the problem we've got is we've only got one customer and it's the Americans and0.92
00:17:51.460the Americans have got a doddering old man who opposes our energy sector shutting us in. So
00:17:57.620got that from Trudeau. We've got that from Biden. We're in a lot of trouble. So the world is
00:18:02.340desperately demanding oil and gas. We're seeing it by the prices, but it's Saudi Arabia filling
00:18:06.660the need, Venezuela, Russia, you know, while our ethically produced energy products are
00:18:14.420remaining shut in the ground. It's just bizarre. It's ridiculous. And we're losing.
00:18:22.420Rich Rogers said, when the vaccine came out, the flu mutated. Yeah, I don't know. I mean,
00:18:26.340that's the thing. These are fluid things. And I really worry about where the bar gets set,
00:18:31.100though. I mean, do you think this is the last infectious virus that's going to come and hit
00:18:36.060the world population? It's going to threaten people. It's going to scare them. There's going
00:18:39.440to be more. It happens. It's natural, unfortunately. We do want to get it under control. But now that
00:18:45.520we've set this standard that we will shut down the world every time something like that comes
00:18:49.840out that's going to kill 0.01% of the population, this is going to be a bad future to look ahead
00:18:57.540to. So yeah, where are we looking at it? You know, let's see here. I got to get better
00:19:06.880with this screen sharing thing there. Arm can't reach far enough. What else did I want
00:19:13.500to cover today? See, we've got a new show. There's so much to cover and so much to hit
00:19:17.140at once. So come on, people talk to me. There we go. Jane Fonda. Some of these people just don't
00:19:25.320go away. So let's get some suggestions out there. What do we got with the commenters? I see a good
00:19:28.820number of viewers though. How do we push back? How do we stop this ongoing effort to shut down
00:19:37.100our energy sector? I mean, when the federal government won't give us a permit, how can we
00:19:42.460force a pipeline? As much as I'd like to be able to say, we could just crush our way through. We
00:19:46.380can't do that. So where does it go from there? All right, well, let's get on to somebody else
00:19:53.760then. The Kielburgers, since we're going to go federally, you know, something actually,1.00
00:19:59.220a fantastic story at Western Standard Online, Dave Naylor put it together,
00:20:04.780was an exchange between Pierre Polyev and one of the Kielburger brothers,
00:20:12.000where they were discussing whether or not they'd actually been in communication with the Prime
00:20:17.600Minister's office. And Ben Chin, who used to be a CBC employee, Ben Chin is now in the
00:20:28.680communications office with the Prime Minister. And he was definitely, they've got now information
00:20:33.860linking the Kielberger brothers in direct communication with Ben Chin, which thus
00:20:39.460means the Prime Minister's office. And the stumbling, confused, excuse-making from Kielberger
00:20:46.000during that, I guess you could say interrogation by Polyav was something else. So I should go into
00:20:52.960that. Western Standard Online, that's where our news is. There's what's called a leaky paywall.
00:20:58.360There will be a number of stories you can get for free, but after that, we will need a subscription.
00:21:02.280And I know some people have been a little upset with that, but we are independent and we aren't
00:21:07.380taking government funding like so many media outlets are, such as the CBC. We do rely on you
00:21:13.340guys to keep this content going, to keep things rolling. We need those subscriptions and then we
00:21:17.840can get that sort of content like Dave puts up there with these great interviews. So please
00:21:22.340consider subscribing online as well. If you're watching this, subscribe on YouTube, subscribe
00:21:26.640on Facebook. We get these specials. Tomorrow night, Danielle Smith, by the way, is doing another one
00:21:31.340that's going to be up and out there. It's going to be, I don't know the exact subject matter,
00:21:36.480but her theme with these ongoing specials has been the COVID-19. She did the interviews with
00:21:41.660David Redman and Aaron Coates, who was on Tucker Carlson recently. So be sure to get on there and
00:21:49.820have a look at those things. You know, they're going to keep coming up and covering that news
00:21:54.200that nobody else will cover. Susan saying, you know, how do we get the information and news out
00:21:58.480to the masses? It's not just Facebook and live stream. Many folks aren't technologically equipped
00:22:03.680beyond a tv and a basic cell phone well it's a challenge but you know we can share we can push
00:22:09.680i i know that there's still the the standard um social media mechanisms to get things out there
00:22:18.240but uh it's going to take a while most people though are online uh something that was very
00:22:23.440interesting when talking about these kinds of broadcasts actually i i'm in predecessor so uh
00:22:27.760which is just outside of calgary you would think though i was in the arctic with the internet that
00:22:32.240we have out here it really comes and goes and can be terrible so we've applied for we're on the
00:22:36.880waiting list for that starlink which is elon musk's creation which is going to stream internet
00:22:43.040information everywhere but the other things that that they've got in mind i mean this is incredible
00:22:48.560we could finally see a world with uh unlimited internet streaming they're going to build cars
00:22:55.440that are capable of receiving this if you want to see the end of radio stations that's going to be
00:23:00.400it now you can stream your music directly to your car or your talk programs things such as this
00:23:05.520be in your vehicle it can stream unlimited to your phone no matter where you're going so you
00:23:09.440can listen to it in your headset or you can watch it on your phone screen so the world is changing
00:23:14.560the old media is changing and if we stay on top of this curve we can make sure good information
00:23:20.640is getting out there a problem we have of course now the liberals are desperately trying to find
00:23:26.640ways to control the internet control what we're allowed to say control what we're allowed to do
00:23:31.760i'm hoping in this information age that they're trying to stop a strainer though you know it's
00:23:36.720just going to leak out if you block speech here it's going to spring up there and you just are
00:23:41.840not going to get this out of here you can't do it but they're going to try uh there's nothing that
00:23:48.640uh an authoritarian state likes more than controlling information uh i had the good
00:23:56.400fortune way back at the end of the 80s to travel through the soviet union and when uh i crossed
00:24:01.600from uh with aeroflot from finland to moscow we flew over there and you know customs came along
00:24:07.920they searched my bags i travel i'm used to uh you know they're looking for drugs or they're looking
00:24:14.400for for other uh illicit items well what were they searching for the soviet union back then
00:24:18.320they were looking for cassette tapes and books they wanted to control the influx of information
00:24:24.800from the outside world i mean they didn't want the poor miserable population to know just how poor
00:24:30.400and miserable they were under a communist state so they were trying to stop the the the incoming
00:24:37.040information in order to stop that from happening which didn't work and in the long run it was uh
00:24:42.960successful i mean that's part of what made it crumble when gorbachev came along for those of
00:24:46.400of you too young to remember it was the people saw what's happening on the other side of the wall
00:24:50.160they saw what's happening in the rest of the world and they said that's enough and uh if the
00:24:57.300information had been controlled if they could control it in the 80s as they did back in the 50s
00:25:02.300they would probably still be communist today but as long as people can communicate we can stop
00:25:07.360authoritarian dictators from controlling us so but we've got to be vigilant um and yeah some things
00:25:14.160expensive dale frisk is pointing out sterling's 800 for the equipment and 150 for the subscription
00:25:19.440yes it is but you know using my telus hub right now isn't very cheap either uh for those of us
00:25:24.160who are in areas again with limited internet and that's just the starting rate i mean as things
00:25:28.080get bigger we uh you know and we see uh infrastructure perhaps competition maybe
00:25:35.840there's gonna be more satellites coming up these prices will get cheaper and it's surprising with
00:25:38.560tech how fast it is i mean think of 20 years ago could you imagine you'd be able to read an email
00:25:42.960on your phone and the internet was there but it had a way to go as dale also pointed out yes putin
00:25:48.160still wants uh to control information and control new media he's trying to shut down twitter uh
00:25:54.000china yes they're attacking the religious there and not enough people are speaking up on it that's0.79
00:25:58.800it's been another terrible area of weakness with our uh prime minister and our federal government1.00
00:26:05.760that that soft spot with china you know they're committing atrocities against their people they're0.98
00:26:11.680a vicious authoritarian regime that spies on other nations that steals information yet Trudeau just0.98
00:26:20.320just rolls over you know they're holding our Canadians hostage and at best he will wag his
00:26:25.360finger a little bit at them it really again if you want to feed conspiracy theories let's talk about
00:26:30.080why is the Trudeau government so beholden to the state of China where we at yeah as Dale says it's
00:26:39.520it's a bargain for the internet at that sort of price. Now we got here, you know, this really
00:26:45.860shows again where we are in our politics, especially with the East and energy here in
00:26:50.600Alberta. So this was an exchange from Twitter again, where we had Gerald Butts, everybody
00:26:56.340knows, he's Prime Minister Trudeau's right-hand man there. And Pierre Polyev, you know, who's
00:27:02.600been a very outspoken member of parliament in in in ottawa he's the member from carlton and he was
00:27:10.080just saying freedom he put a little tweet with the family he's having a beer but the big thing was
00:27:15.740he was wearing an oil sand strong shirt and uh gerald butt says pierre's gonna make a nice uh
00:27:22.500fine next vp ontario for the canadian association of petroleum producers uh they really do think
00:27:30.340that it's offensive that somebody wears something that's pro-oil and gas, something that funds
00:27:36.520billions and billions of dollars for Canadian social programs, for Canadian infrastructure,
00:27:40.120for individuals, for pension. They see this as bad. They attack it. I mean, Butts really thought
00:27:46.300he was taking a nasty shot at Polyev for his daring to look supportive of Alberta or even just
00:27:53.620Canadian energy. What is the matter with this nation? And this is the guy who has Trudeau's
00:27:58.320here. This shows some of the futility, it seems, of trying to, you know, develop our resources and
00:28:07.580get them out. This hostile environment with this federal government. I mean, you know, he certainly
00:28:14.160wouldn't have done that if it was hydroelectric in Quebec or manufacturing somewhere or fisheries in
00:28:20.020the east. But you know, when it's something of an Albertan or Western bent, and you can see the
00:28:27.020root of our alienation, our crabbiness out here, then it's something to mock or shoot at or even
00:28:34.440say that it's a bad thing. So in here, at least again, one thing with Pierre Polyev, he doesn't
00:28:41.660back down. He did respond well. He said, oh, and you would make a fine lobbyist for SNC-Lavalin
00:28:47.520the next time they need help with the law. Because yes, the entrenched Laurentian elite and their
00:28:54.360companies, among which is SNC-Lavalin, which the liberals
00:28:58.620again swept under the rug, Bombardier, you know, so many of
00:29:02.580those central Canadian companies, executives, the elite, that just
00:29:08.100seem to be bulletproof. It doesn't matter how many subsidies
00:29:11.220they get, how bad their performance is, they remain in
00:29:15.000business. And off they go. So we should have our fellow from the
00:29:24.360taxpayers Federation along here any moment now pardon me and I'm just
00:29:32.100looking sorry I got an update from Dave Naylor I got a spammer from some guy
00:29:39.240named Mark so it's breaking judges worried that pastor coats fine is not
00:29:46.240not enough it's sitting bail so I'm not sure I'll expand on this in just a moment
00:29:52.120and uh so yeah it looks like it's gonna be a few more hours uh to hear if he's gonna get mail
00:30:00.680uh he's still in solitary you still can't talk to him i imagine if pastor coates gets out soon i
00:30:06.840mean we will uh uh be able to interview him and ask about this i mean his wife erin has been
00:30:13.440fantastic as i said she was a tucker carlton uh which is a widely rated show in the united states
00:30:19.920of course. So we will update you as fast as we can as that information breaks.
00:30:28.820Yeah, Mike Connelly pointing out how long it's going to be before we see a budget table from
00:30:33.200the Liberals. I don't know. I won't hold my breath. I'm guessing though, just to throw a
00:30:37.400shot out there, the Liberals want to go to an election. The Conservatives are still lagging
00:30:43.000in the polls. The Liberals are going to put together a unicorn piss budget that's just going
00:30:49.740to be full of baloney and projections that are unrealistic and then say this is so important
00:30:54.380we're going to have to take that to Canadians and they'll go to the polls and if they win
00:30:58.500well they'll set the budget aside and come up with a new one which who knows where that's going to go
00:31:03.060so right on time we do have Franco Terrazzano coming on board he's the Alberta director of
00:31:10.620the Canadian Taxpayers Federation these guys have been all over our governments on all their levels
00:31:15.520because those governments have been all over us
00:37:41.860I mean, what we need from our governments, especially our federal government, is just
00:37:45.680for them to take their boots off our necks, right?
00:37:48.300you have bill c69 the no more pipelines law you had bill c48 the discriminatory tanker ban
00:37:53.300we we know that ottawa we hear ottawa is going to be hiking its carbon tax on april 1st that's not
00:37:59.140an april fool's joke it's just a cruel insult to taxpayers and and we we hear trudeau is going to
00:38:04.400be massively increasing that carbon tax down the road and he's getting ready to hammer us
00:38:08.080with his second carbon tax so i mean it's it's really death by a thousand cuts for for our
00:38:12.940industry here in Alberta. And, you know, to give Premier Kenney some credit, because credit is due,
00:38:18.960he is doing the right thing when it comes to business taxes, right? He reduced the business
00:38:23.000tax to 8%. One of the most competitive jurisdictions in all of North America is what
00:38:27.880Alberta is becoming. But just because he's doing some things right, like reducing the business tax,
00:38:34.440it doesn't make sense for him then to turn around and harm taxpayers by taking our money
00:38:39.460and giving it to handpicked businesses when we should be letting the market dictate who should
00:38:44.520win and who should lose. Yeah, there's an old quote. I'm probably going to slaughter it as
00:38:50.080a paraphrase of it. Governments are terrible at picking winners, but losers are really good at0.95
00:38:54.400picking governments. It just seems that the governments don't pick the best business plan,
00:38:59.080they pick the best lobbyist. And that doesn't mean it's going to go well. They really should
00:39:03.140just stay out of it. But that temptation seems never to stop with them. So speaking of losers
00:39:08.180in government let's move on to municipally here uh you guys have been talking about you know that
00:39:13.140the pandemic of course has really hurt a lot of us people have lost jobs those who are still working
00:39:18.580a lot of them have either reduced hours or reduced pay but it appears if you're in the municipal
00:39:23.940civil service that's not the case well yeah i mean that was a great way to say going into this i mean
00:39:29.860there's been a lot of things that we've been extremely upset about with calgary city council
00:39:34.580But just late last week, we find out that 14,000, nearly 14,000 city employees received a pay raise during lockdowns in 2020, an extra cost of $27 million to the taxpayer.
00:39:48.300I mean, there's been so many things that taxpayers have a right to be outraged over with Calgary City Hall.
00:39:53.780But this one is just an absolute slap in the face to know that the private sector has been shedding jobs.
00:39:59.920The people who are lucky enough to hold on to their jobs have been taking massive pay cuts or, to your point, reduced hours.
00:40:06.620You have businesses that have shut their doors down for good, many holding on for dear life.
00:40:11.860And now taxpayers have the privilege to be paying higher taxes.
00:40:15.880So nearly 14,000 bureaucrats at City Hall could get a raise last year.
00:41:12.6402020 was not the first year of the downturn in Alberta.
00:41:15.920We've been in a downturn for more than five years, right?
00:41:18.500It wasn't like 2020, all of a sudden we have a downturn.
00:41:21.120really we've seen city council asleep at the wheel for the last five years if we go back to 2015
00:41:27.040the cost of pay raises for the city bureaucrats put taxpayers on the hook for an extra 230 million
00:41:34.800dollars i mean corey to me that is a significant sum of money and that's extra taxes for families
00:41:40.400and businesses who can least afford it yeah i mean we need a break uh you know these businesses are
00:41:47.120hanging by a thread and again you know that well we've got calgary economic development who's been
00:41:52.000sitting on i don't know what's left of a hundred million dollar fund to try and dole out to the
00:41:56.080winners and losers they're trying to find but a lot of the existing businesses there are some that
00:42:00.800are still operating they just need a break they need the city just as you said get off their neck
00:42:05.520and they will happily uh contribute i guess you could say well remember remember back in 2019
00:42:12.320the spring of 2019 it was only it was only about a few years ago but it seems like a decade ago
00:42:16.480just with with a whirlwind of all the things that have been happening since then but in 2019 there
00:42:21.120was a calgary business tax rally at city hall and i was there i ended up speaking to council that day
00:42:27.440and i talked to as many business owners as i could speak to and the common thread that i heard from
00:42:32.160almost every business owner is that they all they want is for the city of calgary to spend their tax
00:42:37.600dollars wisely right to stop with all these crazy benefits to stop with all the art projects to stop
00:42:44.560with all of that kind of stuff so they wanted city hall to spend money wisely um and reduce
00:42:51.120their tax bill i didn't hear a single business say that they wanted corporate welfare i didn't
00:42:56.640hear a single business say that they want the bureaucrats to be giving them other people's tax
00:43:01.600dollars but to your point which you've raised we we see the city of calgary sitting on a hundred
00:43:07.680million dollar corporate slush fund right that's money taken from taxpayers in many cases struggling
00:43:13.040businesses and then used by these bureaucrats to be picking winners and losers uh corey i just
00:43:18.640did a quick check today and there's still nearly 60 million dollars in that corporate slush fund
00:43:24.800immediately that slush fund should be drained and those tax dollars should be going back to
00:43:29.200struggling businesses well absolutely i mean we got the bird in hand we got the companies that
00:43:34.000are successful why be chasing other ones when these ones are struggling why lose 10 calgary
00:43:38.480companies to try and draw in one maybe down the road uh miriam uh rashleigh i i was probably
00:43:46.240correct is asked the question though the tough one because it's easy for us to to and we do
00:43:50.320that's uh we're about but what's the solution you know what do we do get a civil lawsuit against
00:43:54.480the municipal government uh you know she's getting tired of of the bad news and yeah there's there's
00:43:59.520always a lot of bad news so where can we go how can we turn this around what do we got to do here
00:44:04.320what is the government going to do here well oh the government has a laundry list of things to do
00:44:09.520um the canadian taxpayers federation along with some other advocacy groups i mean cory and you
00:44:14.080were there for this press conference we held a press conference that showed 21 different ways
00:44:18.720for city council to cut the fat in 2021. the whole point of that was to show that there's still a ton
00:44:23.760of fat at the city of calgary where they can still cut um so to answer part of that question there's
00:44:30.400a laundry list of what governments need to do um to get to the the more difficult question in terms
00:44:36.080of advocacy well there's many different things when it comes to the city of calgary you have
00:44:40.800to attend their budget meetings you have to be there to show that calgarians actually do want
00:44:45.760the government to reduce spending and reduce the tax pills right if you don't show up i mean um
00:44:51.280you're not going to make an impact the other things to do is is go to taxpayer.com um you
00:44:56.160You can join our organization free of charge to get our action updates to know when we're hosting events.
00:45:03.000And with COVID-19, it's typically virtual right now or when we're hosting other types of mobilization efforts.
00:45:09.420But the big thing is you have to keep contacting City Hall.
00:45:12.860You have to keep contacting your MLAs and MPs, especially in the upcoming election.
00:45:17.160I mean, we're going to be publishing a list of questions that you should be asking each councillor candidate when they come knocking on your door.
00:45:26.160Yeah, well, and this is the year, if any, they're going to be listening. I mean, that's been a trend. It used to be a three-year trend. Now it's a four-year trend where suddenly they all turn into conservatives and responsible people for six or eight months leading up to election. And then, of course, the election passes, they go back to their free spending, irresponsible ways.
00:45:42.280uh teresa shore yeah because you did put out uh yeah i remember that i was freezing cold
00:45:48.140i'm sitting all steps that day uh 21 uh items to cut and she's asking you might not have it
00:45:55.220immediately on hand but still where's your top five of the laundry list uh you know which ones
00:45:59.880can you really point out yeah yeah yeah so uh first i have to say it has to be across the board
00:46:05.820right you have to see spending reductions across the board on that list we said that the city of
00:46:10.820Calgary should bring its spending across the board back down to 2014-15 levels, right? That's
00:46:16.420right before the downturn began. So we're saying, look, families and businesses have found ways to
00:46:21.280find savings throughout the downturn. And that's where the city of Calgary should be looking to
00:46:26.560reduce spending across the board. And Corey, just one point is that we saw spending at the
00:46:31.920city of Calgary massively increase in 2013. And it's kind of reasonable why it did, right? To deal
00:46:38.620with the floods. That was a huge situation for Calgary. But the problem is, is that we haven't
00:46:43.700seen spending levels be brought back to pre-flood normals, so to speak. So the problem is they
00:46:49.500massively increased spending and we've just seen spending increase year after year. So the first
00:46:54.360one is across the board savings. The second one is you have to go at the elephant in the room,
00:46:59.840the cost elephant in the room, which we've been talking about, which is labor, right? Salaries,
00:47:03.920the number of employees and the crazy benefits. Maybe that's point number three is these crazy
00:47:08.720benefits. Not only are city employees receiving a generous defined benefit pension plan at a time
00:47:16.120when most workers outside of government don't get a pension plan, but there's hundreds, hundreds of
00:47:21.520city of Calgary employees receiving two or three pensions, which is just completely ridiculous and
00:47:27.240out of touch. The fourth one, it has to be corporate welfare, right? Let's start with that
00:47:31.58060 million dollars left in the in the corporate slush fund that the city of calgary is on top of
00:47:37.420and you know let's lump in number five with just the priorities let's let's the we need our
00:47:43.960counselors to have or exercise some common sense to say what is necessary what is not necessary
00:47:49.860we should only be focusing on the essentials right now um you know i'll i'll say something
00:47:54.960that maybe some of your listeners will agree maybe some won't but the 300 million dollars
00:48:00.680that Calgary taxpayers are on the hook for the Calgary Flames arena is absolutely non-essential
00:48:07.580and look I'm I'm a huge fan of hockey like but the thing is is that we should be supporting
00:48:13.900the Flames with tickets and not with our tax dollars. Yeah that's it is a controversial one
00:48:21.040it's funny uh and and frustrating sometimes how many hardcore fiscal conservatives suddenly open
00:48:27.920up a big exception when it comes to their favorite sports team uh these are companies these are
00:48:32.640businesses and they they can be viable ones just like any other if we create the right environment
00:48:38.720for them to operate in i mean maybe there's ways we could have facilitated a a stadium or things
00:48:43.840like that without such a direct injection of taxpayers dollars on it or an arena but once
00:48:47.680they do that we're down that rabbit hole and and we sink further and of course it's always well
00:48:53.840that city did it so we have to do it well you know the the race to the bottom unfortunately costs us
00:48:58.960all dearly um is the city hiring more people again i saw a bizarre job posting a safe calgary threw
00:49:06.240that out on twitter for a position of some kind of really strange name of a manager of
00:49:13.920people person or something i'm guessing maybe it was human resources
00:49:17.040and it gave a pay range of, I believe, $170,000 to $320,000 a year, which again was bizarre with
00:49:25.020just how wide that range is they were advertising for. What roles is the city filling right now?
00:49:30.500What are they doing in there that they're bringing on new staff of an indeterminate role at that
00:49:35.400price? Well, that's a great question, especially when we're in this massive downturn and a
00:49:42.000downturn that we've been in for more than five years. Now, sometimes I hear counselors and even
00:49:47.000top city administration, the top city brass, talking about these savings that they're finding
00:49:51.840labor. And I just don't know what they're actually pointing to. Because when I look at the city's
00:49:57.000annual reports, I've seen labor costs increase by hundreds of millions of dollars during the
00:50:01.760downturn. I've seen a ton of new full-time municipal employees being hired during the
00:50:07.240downturn. So they're talking about all these savings that they're finding. And I don't know
00:50:11.240what they're talking about because when I'm looking at the city of Calgary's annual reports
00:50:15.940which you can find online I'm seeing the exact opposite I mean maybe they're talking about well
00:50:20.820they're they're spending less than what they would have wanted to spend on right but if you ask
00:50:26.440families in the real world if you ask businesses we'll tell you that that's not actually finding
00:50:30.980savings like do if you remember um the letter that Mayor Nenshi sent with the property tax
00:50:37.580increase it talked about finding all of these savings but if you look at the budget year after
00:50:42.860year spending is going up yeah i mean it's just it's just hard math and another area it comes down
00:50:50.520to efficiencies which is a little more difficult to define it maybe we could talk a little bit
00:50:55.360about that a picture i like using from a blog posting i wrote years ago but i'd seen it posted
00:51:00.260by somebody and they'd taken it from a plus 15 and there were literally 10 people standing around
00:51:06.020while one guy painted a green box on a bike track.
00:51:43.400And we see that, unfortunately, with civil service.
00:51:46.780I know there's some very hardworking people out there, you know,
00:51:50.680highways and maintenance and city jobs.
00:51:54.420But there's also just a terrible amount of redundancy, inefficiency,
00:51:58.440and it does often come back to organized labor.
00:52:01.540That's always the big elephant in the room.
00:52:03.680how do you get particularly the civil service unions to start talking reasonably about as you
00:52:10.940said rather than layoffs let's examine pay cuts rather than uh you know cutting programs let's
00:52:16.700see how we could do them at a better rate then so we can do more of them but they just seem
00:52:20.340intractable well there's so much to unpack there cory really um it all comes down at the end of
00:52:25.640the day to are you getting value for the city services are your tax dollars being spent wisely
00:52:32.060And I think it's not only that the city of Calgary is spending a ton of money, it's how they are spending that money.0.74
00:52:38.100And I don't think you can go to Calgary taxpayers and tell a Calgarian who might have just lost their job,
00:52:43.260might have just taken a 15% pay cut, or might be a small business owner who just laid off two of their friends
00:52:48.580and tell them that they have more than 100 city of Calgary employees who are receiving three pensions.
00:52:55.140I don't think too many of those Calgarians would say that that's a good use of their tax dollars.
00:53:00.080I'm a Calgary taxpayer, and I can tell you I don't think that's a good use of my money, you know, especially when the vast majority of Albertans outside of government don't get a single pension.
00:53:09.520So to your point, this often comes down to the city's unionized government union bosses that we need our councillors to have a political spine and arm wrestle with.
00:53:20.880You know, there's great data published by secondstreet.org, a Canadian think tank, and they asked the city of Calgary, when was the last time that unionized employees took a pay cut? Surprise, surprise, data going back to the 1970s show no records at all of their city employees ever taking a pay cut, ever taking a pay cut.
00:53:43.880Now, in terms of how do you actually solve this problem, you have to take a page from Premier Ralph Klein back in 1994.
00:53:52.520What did he say? He said, we're going to cut the budget by 5%.
00:53:55.680Either you take 5% further layoffs or you take 5% wage rollbacks.
00:54:01.480Now, fortunately, we saw the union bosses agree to a 5% wage rollback.
00:54:06.060But that's the type of tactic that we're going to need to see our politicians take here.
00:54:11.360Yeah, well, and some of those labor bosses themselves are making a pretty healthy coin0.98
00:54:17.760from their union members. I think there might be some room for efficiency on their union dues,
00:54:22.080you know, maybe if they took a bit of a wage cut, but they also had a reduction in union dues to
00:54:28.480help offset that, you know, maybe the pork at the union level needs to get a little bit of trimming0.91
00:54:33.040as well. And getting to that, you know, I mean, what's with groups, Alberta Federation of Labor,
00:54:39.680good old Gil McGowan there. I mean, he's also been very outspoken about reopening. You know,
00:54:46.480I mean, I'm not asking you to make a medical opinion here or anything. But again, it really
00:54:51.680comes down to, it seems odd, labor organizations pushing so hard for people not to go back to work.
00:55:00.320They are happy to have people paid to sit at home. But how long can we afford that trend? We just
00:55:06.720can't seem to do it but the priorities of labor unions just really seem to be skewed well and
00:55:12.240certainly it's going to have to be taxpayers one way or another who are paying that money back
00:55:16.160right whether it's the provincial government where we have to pay higher taxes um or or higher debt
00:55:21.840which eventually is taxes or if you look at the federal government where it's the same thing
00:55:26.080applies more taxes but also could be inflation a reduction in what our our money can actually
00:55:32.000purchase right that in and of itself is a higher tax now one key thing that i want to bring up
00:55:36.960because we've been talking about labor and it's clear to me that there's a huge divide in alberta
00:55:42.560between two classes of people one is the government employees who have been completely shielded or
00:55:48.240largely shielded from this downturn many as we've been talking about have been made better off
00:55:53.440and then the other group of employees and that's private sector workers and business owners who've
00:55:58.720been just been taking it on the chin for the last five plus years and who have been forced to pay
00:56:03.600for this growing cap so there is there has been a classified here in alberta and we've also seen
00:56:09.360that when we're talking about private sector versus government unions uh the canadian taxpayers
00:56:14.400federation we put out a report back in december that showed we found nearly 300 government union
00:56:20.880wage settlements in alberta that resulted in a pay increase we didn't find a single one of those
00:56:26.560since 2015 that resulted in a pay reduction. On the other hand, we saw more than 100 private
00:56:33.360sector unions agree to a pay reduction. So you can't tell me that just because it's a union that
00:56:40.100they can't take a pay cut because we saw that happen across Alberta during the downturn because
00:56:44.940private sector unions, they realized like, hey, we want to keep more of our staff employed. We
00:56:49.440want to make sure businesses stay afloat. So they were willing to share in the downturn.
00:56:53.260Yeah, there is a big difference and it's worth distinguishing between the private and public sector unions. I mean, the private sector ones, I think have a bit of a better understanding that, you know, they can kill the golden goose. If they keep pushing, there's just not going to be any more to take. Public sector seems to have a bit of a mindset that it's just the magical money machine. We can just keep printing it and there won't be consequences and government can keep spending and borrowing and spending and borrowing, which I think the whole world's in for a big lesson on that pretty soon, I'm afraid.
00:57:23.260Just to expand a little though, because, you know, you guys have mentioned this a lot before
00:57:27.500and it's a big one, but it seems inconceivable and it's worth just keep hammering to show how
00:57:32.140crazed some of these compensation packages are. Ray is asking, Ray, how can someone be able to
00:57:39.340get three pension plans? How is that working that way? Is it past negotiated settlements or something?
00:57:45.840Well, it's absolutely ridiculous, but let me explain kind of how it works. So,
00:57:49.960So and it's not just happening at the city of Calgary.
00:57:53.280We actually found thousands of municipal government employees all across Alberta that are eligible for two or three pensions.
00:58:00.600But at the city of Calgary, it's a big one.
00:58:02.620The cost of the second and third pensions for Calgary taxpayers was about 15 million dollars.
00:58:08.800And that's an annual expense, 15 million bucks.
00:58:11.320And so how it happens is, you know, you have a very large portion of City of Calgary employees that get their defined benefit pension plan, your basic defined benefit pension plan.
00:58:23.480And that pension plan provider actually refers to itself as being quite generous.
00:58:28.280And let's remember, the vast majority of Albertans outside of government don't receive a first pension or any pension, workplace pension.
00:58:34.300So on top of that first pension is a second pension, and it essentially tops up the benefits of the first pension.
00:58:41.320So it tops up a portion of that first pension benefits.
00:58:45.400Now, the third pension, where there was a little bit over 100 employees who was receiving
00:58:49.720that at the City of Calgary, what it does is that it tops up the pension for high-income
01:19:40.500we believe that climate change is a serious issue.
01:19:44.200And more importantly, we have an alternative solution
01:19:47.140to what the existing status quo is on how to deal with the issue.
01:19:53.700So, for example, we hear about we need to find a way to reduce carbon.
01:20:02.200Well, I'm of the opinion that taxing something doesn't really reduce carbon.
01:20:07.960So I would argue, let's look at Alberta,
01:20:10.600at all of those great oil sands operations throughout Alberta.
01:20:14.340There are significant lithium deposits.
01:20:17.140and there's an opportunity where the Conservative Party could have said we believe in climate change
01:20:24.580and the way we want to combat it is through a national mining strategy where we try and get
01:20:30.320all of the provinces in Canada from Newfoundland to BC on the same page and we will supply the
01:20:36.560lithium to the electric vehicle market globally. We will supply the nickel, we will supply the
01:20:42.500platinum, we will supply the gold, so on and so forth. You know, another thing the Conservatives
01:20:47.840could have done is they could have talked about hydroelectric power. You know, there's a renewable,
01:20:55.880clean source of energy that Manitoba has vast, vast quantities of. Same thing with British0.99
01:21:03.600Columbia, same thing with Quebec, same thing with Newfoundland. And the Conservatives had nothing
01:21:08.800to say all they did was they spent the entire weekend saying we believe in change we believe
01:21:14.200in change we are going to vote down the climate change issue but we believe in change so you know
01:21:21.300I think this was an opportunity where they could have showed Canadians that they have a plan that
01:21:26.640they could have put a plan together and instead you know people walked away from that wondering
01:21:31.840what does the party want what does it mean by change what you know and I think that's not
01:21:38.020to help them i think that's actually going to lead to their defeat and that's because
01:21:42.740they don't have a policy roadmap well ambiguity is is just a killer you know because it all really
01:21:49.780comes down to trust then and we don't have a lot of trust in our politicians on any level these days
01:21:55.620the public at large are they going in general so we need to see things laid out in the west when we
01:22:01.220see ambiguous uh policies or ambiguous statements saying you know we're going to tackle climate
01:22:06.580change but we're not saying how well then we do start seeing well what are you talking about and
01:22:10.580we're nervous we've been beaten on a lot here we've dealt with c69 c48 you know tanker bands
01:22:17.700carbon taxes what is it more of the same we get nervous our backs get up we need you to lay it
01:22:24.580out as you said here's some things we can talk about we'll still produce in the oil sands but
01:22:29.540we can also we've got this byproduct of lithium i mean we could participate in the larger market
01:22:34.260in the changing market. I mean, a pragmatic approach. I like that, but the party isn't
01:22:38.180touching it. Something Danielle Smith spoke of, I believe, before as well at a different conference
01:22:44.200was carbon could be a resource, actually. There's some pretty creative products coming up. I mean,
01:22:50.040when we're talking about carbon capture, that you may be able to do things with that carbon rather
01:22:54.000than just sequester it. Let's get creative. Let's look at what our resources are. Likewise, though,
01:22:59.680when we see the Conservatives being, you know, again, cagey or showing ambiguity with climate
01:23:05.700and environmental policy, people who are more concerned about it in Central or Eastern Canada
01:23:09.360say, well, does that mean you're just actually not going to do anything and you're paying lip
01:23:12.380service to it? So, I mean, I see this approach as perhaps losing support and trust on both fronts,
01:23:17.300which is a bad recipe for an election. Well, I agree with you. And quite frankly,
01:23:22.080I'm uncomfortable with the Conservative Party always framing these discussions of we need to
01:23:28.460do something for the West, or we need to do something for Atlantic Canada, or we need to
01:23:33.900do something for BC, I think what they should start doing is talking to Canadians. So whether
01:23:38.500you're a Canadian that lives in Calgary, or you're a Canadian that lives in Halifax or Toronto,
01:23:45.000people have the same sort of concerns and worries, you know, the concerns and worries, like
01:23:50.120We can, you know, the climate issue is one, pocketbook issues is another, you know, retirement savings is another issue.
01:24:00.060Where are their kids going to go to school?
01:24:01.960But instead of talking to Canadians, they're determined for some bizarre reason of speaking to specific regions.
01:24:11.720And when they speak to those specific regions, they do it in such a manner that you've alluded to where they don't talk any sort of policy.
01:24:19.500They just say, like, well, we need to stand up for people in this part of the country.
01:24:25.760You know, and to your point, there's all kinds of innovation.
01:24:28.640There's all kinds of technology out there where we can take existing things that various regions are good, whether it's Alberta or Saskatchewan or whoever.
01:24:38.460And, you know, we can embrace those other things, lithium, nickel, all of this kind of thing.
01:24:43.820And it sort of gives you something to strive for.
01:24:47.500You know, I think the other problem that the party has had, quite frankly, is I like to call it a an identity crisis.
01:24:57.620So is it a political party that's interested in being elected?
01:25:02.020And is it a party that wants to govern Canada or is it a a moral movement?
01:25:08.620And the reason I argue this is because if it's interested in governing Canada, then it will focus the discussion on things that matter to the largest number of Canadians, which is pocketbook issues, which is, you know, how to make the climate issue your issue, fiscal responsibility, those kinds of things.
01:25:29.640If, however, it's intent on sort of having these discussions related to morality, whether it's abortion, equal marriage rights, these kinds of things, they're going to lose every time.
01:25:46.320Because, unfortunately, if we look at the 2019 election, you know, the conservatives, they beat the liberals in the popular vote, but they lost the election.
01:25:59.200And I argue the reason they lost that election was that when the leader was questioned on a basic thing like do you support gay marriage and he sort of paused and hummed and hoed and wasn't really sure how to answer the question, it left a lot of Canadians all over the country sort of scratching their heads and wondering, who is this guy?
01:26:22.420And so, you know, they need to be able to take on these moral issues in a way where they say, look, I understand that so-and-so might be a social conservative or so-and-so might have some personal moral views.
01:26:36.120That's fine. There's nothing wrong with that.
01:26:38.560But they also need to be able to say, as a government, we are not going to be touching any of those issues because that's not the role of government.
01:26:47.160It's not to get into the business of morality, essentially.
01:26:52.420Yeah, and that gets dicey. And again, when somebody dodges on it, you start losing support
01:26:57.540on both sides because you seem untrustworthy. So we do have regional issues, though. I mean,
01:27:03.940that's part of, you know, as Stephanie's kind of pointing out and think this has been going
01:27:06.900on since the beginning of Confederation. I think we've got a real systemic problem, actually,
01:27:11.380you know, with just the way we're laid out. And it makes for a difficult juggling act for any
01:27:15.860government or somebody trying to form government to address. I mean, you've made a great point
01:27:20.580and pointing out look there's a lot of things we have in common we still have concerns about our
01:27:24.100jobs our wallets our health care our education that's universal across the country but we
01:27:29.940definitely have some different points of view between saskatchewan and alberta versus british
01:27:33.860columbia versus nova scotia and of course quebec is is definitely a distinct uh uh zone of its own
01:27:42.500well you know cory not not to interrupt you but i like i noticed so one of your viewers of the
01:27:48.260the television program here today, I think the name was Stephanie, stated that, you know, that
01:27:52.980the conservatives need to ditch the West in order to win the East. I have problems with that
01:27:59.300description as well, because I know you know this, you know, as well as anyone. What do people mean
01:28:05.240by the West? I mean, British Columbia, the conservatives currently, as they're set up right
01:28:10.300now, are in a distant third place in British Columbia. And the last time I checked, British
01:28:14.900Columbia is as far west as you can get in Canada. If we look at Manitoba, the Liberals are in firm
01:28:22.920contention in Manitoba. It's essentially a two-way race. So, you know, if people in Alberta or
01:28:30.440Saskatchewan are deciding that they are the West and they will speak on behalf of the West,
01:28:36.120well, there's a lot of people in Manitoba and BC that are going to feel a little different about
01:28:40.120that and so to your point uh and to what i was saying earlier it's important that we find those
01:28:46.360issues those pocketbook issues those economic issues that unites canadians from coast to coast
01:28:52.760to coast otherwise they're never going to win and so if you don't want to win then you know why run
01:28:58.520for government you know why not just join an advocacy group or why not write letters to the
01:29:03.720editor or what have you you know if you're going to get into the political realm you have to deal
01:29:08.840with the circumstances that are there and the circumstances in the political realm is to win
01:29:14.760and the reason i say that is because your worst day in government is far far better than your
01:29:22.600best day in opposition and that's just an undisputed fact because when you're in government
01:29:27.000you can affect change you can bring about policy change you can embrace innovation you can embrace
01:29:33.320technology. You can do all those things that you can't do in the opposition. If you're in the
01:29:38.820opposition, you're basically criticizing from the sidelines. And I don't see any benefit to that.
01:29:44.560I really don't. I think it's a waste of time. You know, I will differ a little bit on that front
01:29:51.420with getting back to the 90s when I was really, you know, getting through the politics myself and
01:29:56.780that. I remember that era quite well, actually. And I mean, the Gretchen liberals, if nothing
01:30:03.020else, and I despise them as a government, but they were pragmatic and they knew how to get
01:30:08.800stuff done. But part of that was because there was a reform party breathing down their necks
01:30:13.600and a very effective opposition. I think the reform started losing some of its
01:30:17.760ability when they started diluting. But then it can be argued it took a long time,
01:30:23.660but eventually that led to the Harper Conservatives getting in, you know, into the 2000s and bringing
01:30:29.920about some conservative government for a change. But we've just got such a, it seems cyclical. It
01:30:35.780just never quite stops. And again, I blame the system rather than the people. It does force,
01:30:40.860as you said, the goal is to get in. If you want to make real change, you've got to be in. You've
01:30:44.800got to be in government. And the only way to win government, realistically, is to win Central
01:30:50.080canada there's no getting around that that's just math that's not and uh but that's part of what
01:30:56.400drives the west wild because we do have some policy differences and that that's why we see
01:31:00.600these spikes in in secessionism which we're really seeing one right now uh because the frustration
01:31:08.220of feeling like well look i would argue that there's not really that many policy differences
01:31:16.020between the quote-unquote West and the rest of Canada.
01:31:19.980I mean, obviously, I know the big issue is the pipeline issue.
01:31:23.880So, you know, what I always argue with Conservatives
01:31:28.340is that arguing about the Energy East pipeline
01:31:34.180when you know that the province of Quebec,
01:31:37.380for a whole host of different reasons,
01:31:39.980is not going to play ball is a waste of time.
01:31:42.560It's a waste of energy, pardon the pun.
01:31:45.560Arguing about British Columbia, why British Columbia doesn't want to play ball, again, I argue that's a waste of energy.
01:31:53.780You know, I think you're better, you're always better in life to look at a problem and rather than complain about the problem, find a solution.
01:32:03.140So I've argued, and I've argued this now for a number of years,
01:32:06.580that the solution for Alberta and Saskatchewan energy exports,
01:32:12.240in order for that product or those two products, gas and oil, to reach tidewater,
01:32:32.300Uh, whereas, you know, I know that beating up on Quebec and to a lesser extent, British Columbia is really great for the conservative party from a fundraising perspective.
01:32:42.920You know, it lets them do those mail out letters that they like to send out every month and they say, hey, we need you to contribute 10 bucks or whatever it is.
01:32:51.840But if they're really interested in finding a solution, uh, what they will do is they will look to Manitoba as the, as the answer.
01:33:01.220So I'm sure you might have a different perspective or maybe the same ideas, but that's how I view it. And just to circle back to your earlier discussion point, I'm not really sure that it was purely the opposition federally, in this case, the Reform Party.
01:33:29.320So if we look at Alberta, and I know it's not my home province, but you had a very successful provincial government in Alberta under Ralph Klein that was able to eliminate the provincial deficit and then go one step further and eliminate the provincial debt.
01:33:46.980In Ontario, you had the Mike Harris government that was also very simpatico, if you will, with Ralph Klein in Alberta.
01:33:56.880And then even you had liberal governments like Frank McKenna in New Brunswick.
01:34:03.940And then, of course, you had a federal opposition party with the Reform Party that talked a lot about fiscal responsibility.
01:34:11.420And so that definitely made things easier for the federal liberals, the fact that you had provincial government consensus and you had a federal opposition consensus.
01:35:49.520Hyperinflation is going to hit us pretty hard and pretty soon, I suspect.
01:35:53.180But getting back to, you know, speaking of reform and speaking of politics, it really did reform made it difficult for a conservative government to form again for a long time.
01:36:03.120Because, of course, the Mulroney, well, and then Kim Campbell conservatives were completely decimated at the start of the 90s.
01:36:11.000A lot of that was due to votes bleeding off to reform in the West and just a complete rejection of them in the East because reform only ran in the West.
01:36:24.120And so you had federal liberals and federal conservatives leaving their respective parties to form the bloc in Quebec.
01:36:33.460So to your point, that led to a decimated federal conservative party, all those vote splits occurring in different parts of the country.
01:36:41.680Oh, yeah. People forget Lucien Bouchard came from Mulroney's cabinet initially, I believe.
01:36:46.620But reform was a response to, again, what I keep coming to is kind of a broken system, unfortunately.
01:36:51.620like we were frustrated in the west again we were ticked off it's funny if you want to get the west
01:36:57.220mad we get far more angry when a conservative government screws us and when a liberal one does
01:37:01.780because we expect the liberals to screw us but the cf-18 contract with mulroney that one cut
01:37:08.420deep and that was in manitoba for those who don't remember but there was a uh was it bristol uh
01:37:13.300aerospace so uh so to be fair uh and just to put my cards on the table i've spoken i've been a
01:37:20.420a guest speaker at some of the aviation industry in Manitoba in the past. So yes, it was Bristol
01:37:26.980Aerospace in Winnipeg, who has since become known as Magellan, in fact. And then you had
01:37:35.440Bombardier in Quebec. But yeah, those are stories from 30 years ago. But I mean, to circle it back
01:37:43.100to today, I think the bigger problem is that the Conservatives need to be electable. And so,
01:37:49.540So, you know, I generally believe that Aaron O'Toole made a strategic mistake speaking directly to the party at the convention rather than using that opportunity to speak to Canadians at large.
01:38:01.920And I think if we look at the polling data over the last two months, it's been horrendous.
01:38:08.980And so the national polling data, depending on the polling firm, has the Conservatives anywhere from 23 to 28 percent.
01:38:17.740And that's really problematic because you and your viewers know that the conservatives have kind of a healthy built-in head start in Alberta and Saskatchewan that sort of boosts their national number.
01:38:37.280And the worry in that is that if we look at the polling data, and I'm not saying this in a pejorative or a negative way,
01:38:45.720but if we remove Alberta and Saskatchewan out of that equation, what that means is that the federal conservatives drop from 23 to 28 to like 20 to 25.
01:38:57.840And so that tells me that they're simply not competitive in British Columbia, in Atlantic Canada, in Quebec, and in Ontario, and to some extent, you know, Manitoba's kind of in play.
01:39:14.320so the conservative party its leadership its national council of a conservative fund of
01:39:22.180canada you know all of those components of that that big blue tent they need to figure out how
01:39:30.360to appeal to canadians at large because uh for the last uh six months it's been an abysmal failure
01:39:38.620quite frankly. Yeah, no, there's no avoiding that. I mean, whatever the winning strategy might be,
01:39:45.480that's debatable, but there's no doubt that the current strategy is a losing one. They aren't
01:39:50.760getting there. And I mean, that's part of what, just a head scratcher. I mean, it's not like the
01:39:56.080Trudeau liberals have provided this brilliant, strong leadership and morality and clean governance
01:40:41.820You know, people want to vote against the liberals, fine, but they need to vote for something.
01:40:45.600And the conservatives just can't seem to figure out what that four is yet.
01:40:48.860Yeah, I agree with you 100% on that point.
01:40:51.820I don't believe that it's good enough to say, well, let's wait for the existing government to screw up.
01:40:58.920So there's this old adage that says that opposition parties don't form governments.
01:41:04.640Governments throw themselves out of power.
01:41:09.240I don't think that that sort of thinking applies in the year 2021.
01:41:14.500And the reason I don't believe that applies is because we do have this global medical pandemic that, you know, with COVID that's happening everywhere that is allowing governments of all political stripes to have a bit more support than what they normally would during normal kind of economic times.
01:41:38.060because, you know, I've always argued along with other people that in times of crisis,
01:41:44.220whether it's right or wrong, that large numbers of the populace will rally around their respective
01:41:50.140governments, rather than try to take down their governments. And so to your point,
01:41:56.940I think the Conservatives need to actually put out, you know, a detailed policy roadmap.
01:42:04.380and i think that they they need to be honest and they need to to really talk about it and saying
01:42:11.560like we want change and not telling us what the change is is not good enough and uh you know
01:42:18.580they really need to find these answers and um and if they don't well they're gonna you know there's
01:42:25.780there's not a lot of runway left right so if we think of uh if we think of the conservatives as a
01:42:32.520as a big big blue jumbo jet you know uh there's a short amount of runway and they got to get that
01:42:41.080plane in the air and they're running on a runway and uh that means the likelihood of a victory
01:42:49.640is shrinking every day and um you know that means taking some really hard serious decisions and i
01:42:58.440agree with with Aaron O'Toole by the way like I want to go on the record of saying I agree with
01:43:02.920Aaron that the conservative party needs to accept change now what that change is that he has in mind
01:43:09.880I have no idea I mean I've laid out sort of what I view as a as a road map right and that's fiscal
01:43:18.040responsibility embracing innovation and technology putting together a national mining strategy to
01:43:23.560where you can take advantage of Alberta and Saskatchewan and Manitoba's resources
01:43:27.880in order to supply the global EV market.
01:43:31.720You know, look at the hydroelectric power from British Columbia,
01:43:37.280from Manitoba, from Quebec, from Newfoundland.
01:43:40.140Tie that all into like a national Canadian grid, so to speak.
01:43:44.280You know, those are policy things where the Conservatives could enter
01:43:48.420the election campaign and they could go into the leaders' debates
01:43:52.180and they could say look this is what we want to do and then you could let canadians make an honest
01:43:57.540decision as to which vision they prefer more but as it stands right now if it's just empty
01:44:05.540platitudes of change well then i believe unfortunately that the government the existing
01:44:11.140government will be re-elected and that you know if you're the if you're the liberal party that's
01:44:15.540great you know they're happy about that because i think they're betting on the fact that the
01:44:21.860conservative party and the people within the conservative party lack the the ability to
01:44:29.380sort of talk about bold vision yeah well and getting back to so i mean a lot of our audience
01:44:35.640again predominantly is in the west and there's just again a lot of regional frustration uh and
01:44:41.160how that we spawn new political parties. We do it all the time. We've historically done it from way
01:44:46.600back to the progressives, up to reform, up to the CPC and provincially we do it as well. So
01:44:52.200we've got other ones now. It's not Western, but there's the PPC out there. We've got Maverick
01:44:57.440Party, which a number of people have mentioned now. And Dave Borkman is commenting. He's been
01:45:01.880working on forming yet another federal incarnation of an alternative out there. I don't believe any
01:45:08.060parties in any position to win seats at this point, but they can most definitely still impact
01:45:13.860things. This is core supporters, volunteers, donors, and sometimes perhaps in swing ridings
01:45:19.800on a conservative party that really can't afford to lose those 1% or 2% or 5% here and there.
01:45:25.900Well, and I mean, to your point, so I don't mean to interrupt you.
01:45:29.720So with some of those opposition or some of those other sort of what I like to call fringe parties,
01:45:34.520you know some of them are actually not only bad for the conservative movement but they're just
01:45:40.400bad for Canada in general so if we look at like the PPC for example because you know you hear
01:45:46.860people sort of on the fringes will mention them in passing occasionally you know the problem with
01:45:52.740those guys quite frankly is that their immigration views are out to lunch and the reason I argue that
01:46:02.520is people in Alberta and Saskatchewan and other parts of the country care about the economy and
01:46:08.040care about finances and things like that. The number one way that you could kill off the
01:46:12.840Canadian economy, quite frankly, is to shut down immigration. Because what we have seen
01:46:18.840over the last three or four years is that Canada's retirement rate, according to Stats Canada,
01:46:27.400They're somewhere in the neighborhood of close to half a million Canadians a year are retiring.
01:46:33.280So, you know, those are people leaving the workforce.
01:46:36.100Then you add another somewhere in the vicinity of 300,000 Canadians a year are dying just, you know, through natural causes and those kinds of things.
01:46:48.180um that means you're left with a big uh gap that you need to make up in your workforce in your
01:46:57.160economy in order to keep things moving and uh if we look at the Canadian birth rate uh that's been
01:47:05.060on a downward spiral now for uh two decades and it's not at a high enough rate in order to make0.98
01:47:14.620up for uh the death rate and the retirement rates which is why immigration is important so
01:47:20.460to circle this back around to some of those fringe parties um you know they would those policies of
01:47:27.800of no immigration or bare minimal immigration and these kinds of uh silly ideas they would turn our
01:47:36.400cities into towns our towns into villages and our villages would cease to exist so you know
01:47:43.480immigration is good for the Canadian, for Canada, and it's good for the Canadian economy.
01:47:50.360Yeah, immigration is one where people have taken a short-sighted view of it
01:47:54.440at times, you know, and we see it all over the place. The bottom line, you get the old,0.99
01:48:00.600they're coming and stealing our jobs. Well, no, immigrants are taking actually quite often jobs1.00
01:48:04.280that you didn't want. You know, I did a lot of work in managing projects down in South Texas
01:48:11.240in louisiana pennsylvania through the states and in seismic with the recording crews they're 901.00
01:48:17.640mexican people and i'll be blunt we knew most of them were illegal uh they would show up at the0.98
01:48:23.160safety meeting one morning and there would be a whole bunch of different faces they're all working1.00
01:48:26.040under the same green cards but don't get upset at them nobody else was applying for the bloody job
01:48:33.000and you need the job done uh you need the job done but you have people that are willing to do
01:48:39.240the jobs, that are willing to put in the work, they want to be part of our society, they want
01:48:44.280to be part of our country, and in the long term it benefits all of us as a nation. Whether you
01:48:49.160live in Alberta or Newfoundland or British Columbia or Quebec, immigration is good for Canada.
01:48:57.560This is why I argue that the Conservative Party really needs to be bold, take on a big vision,
01:49:04.120start talking about these big policies. Whether it's Hudson Bay, whether it's a
01:49:08.280national mining strategy whether it's a national hydroelectric power grid uh you know whether it's
01:49:14.920uh pocketbook issues it's got to it's got to take these issues on it's got to embrace them in a way
01:49:20.600and sell them to the public at large if it just wants to fight these old antiquated ideas that
01:49:27.240immigration is bad and that uh you know we don't believe in climate change well they're going to
01:49:33.720to lose every single time, especially if you combine that with the inability to answer basic0.67
01:49:40.500questions on things like gay marriage or abortion. And, you know, I know some of your viewers may
01:49:47.860disagree with me on this, and that's fine. But I'm convinced more than ever that that is the
01:49:55.260roadmap to success. Yeah, well, an interesting point I just brought up out of Stephanie, which
01:50:00.420true but that's just the change of western demographics in the western world uh there
01:50:04.820were some very influential books actually back in the 60s and 70s it turned out to be mostly hogwash
01:50:09.060but it was the the population time bomb and the top population explosion and everybody was told
01:50:13.140that we we're going to overpopulate the world's going to be in a catastrophe so you got to stop
01:50:16.820breeding and well only western societies could afford to take on that sort of tactic and we
01:50:21.540moved on to much more of a society that has one or two or even no kids which is fine but that does0.77
01:50:26.980lead to we need that ongoing generation of immigrants to come in to help pay for the
01:50:32.020retiring people moving out it's it's not a an opinion thing it's a it's a common sense thing
01:50:36.980but it needs to be sold because uh an uninformed vote is still a vote nonetheless well yeah i mean
01:50:42.780i know that i know that 2020 was a unique set of circumstances because of covid but uh stats
01:50:48.880canada released some numbers this week that showed canada's immigration in the year 2020
01:50:54.340is the lowest it's been in over a century that we had less than half a percentage
01:51:03.360in population growth. I think it was like 0.4. So you don't need many years like that
01:51:12.580with the kind of high retirement rates and the sort of the high death rates and the low birth
01:51:21.440rates to very quickly discover that your economy is going to collapse in a relatively short period
01:51:30.440of time. So this is why I don't pay much attention to these fringe parties, because
01:51:36.180they really don't have any sort of ideas. And a lot of them are essentially a pimple
01:51:44.200on the ass of the conservative elephant, and I would much rather be the elephant
01:51:50.860than a pimple on the elephant. Yeah, well, they're an expression of frustration with
01:51:57.780the status quo, though, and something we're going to see is they started fringe, particularly
01:52:03.040federally, but I mean, people called reform fringe when it got going, too, and it did take off.
01:52:07.320They had to evolve, and they had some pretty crazy anti-reform stuff initially, or anti-immigration
01:52:11.460stuff, but they moved beyond it. But it took a lot of work. I mean, Preston Manning was good at
01:52:15.920keeping it to a reasonable voice. And something we've got in the West, and you'll see that
01:52:21.180more and more, you know, in commenters with our listenership, separatism is higher than
01:52:25.640I've ever seen in my life. And it's growing. And you've got to be careful. I mean, I don't want to
01:52:32.240see it as some threat saying, if you guys vote liberal again this time around, we're separating.
01:52:35.620But the reality is, if there's another election, and we're still looking at Prime Minister Trudeau,
01:52:54.580but that's more of an anarchist sort of approach to it.
01:52:57.320But this is going to be a critical election on a number of levels, I think.
01:53:01.140Well, so this is where you and I sort of have divert on this discussion, I guess.
01:53:09.680And I know I'm not in Alberta, and I don't pretend to be in Alberta, but I don't buy into the argument that we're looking at a referendum for a couple of reasons.
01:53:23.820So again, this may make your viewers uncomfortable, but this is my thoughts on it.
01:53:29.380So, I think that if the Conservatives lose provincially, I don't think, I know, based off of all of the polling data, that Rachel Notley and the New Democrats will form government in Alberta.
01:53:44.840and you're never going to see either Jason Kenney and the Alberta Conservative Party
01:53:54.980nor Rachel Notley and the New Democrats talk about a referendum.
01:53:59.400The other thing I think that's important to remember in all of this
01:54:02.800is that despite the conservative side of the ledger, if you will,
01:54:10.060Being extremely successful in Alberta federally, if we look at the breakdown of the vote, let's say 50%, they win 50% of the popular vote.
01:54:25.040That still means that 50% are voting for liberals, a combination of liberals and New Democrats, even though they're not necessarily winning seats.
01:54:36.120And so all of that is important because when people start talking about referendums and these kinds of things,
01:54:42.280the reality is in order to win a referendum, you need to be able to win.
01:55:24.100And just as important, it had the full support, backing, and endorsement of the provincial Quebec government, the Parti Quebecois.
01:55:36.300So it had real infrastructure in place on the ground, both provincially and federally.
01:55:43.460I don't believe for one minute that you're going to see a bunch of Alberta liberals or Alberta New Democrats leave their respective parties in order to champion the secession of Alberta.
01:55:59.480And I know that might make you, I know you might disagree with me on this, but I don't believe that the people advocating this Maverick idea have really fully thought this out.
01:56:15.660And the other thing, quite frankly, is that if you really want to help the federal liberals win more seats, then go ahead, support Maverick, because that's going to create vote splits, which will allow all kinds of federal liberals to be elected in Edmonton and Calgary and all over the place.
01:56:37.960So I don't think that this has been fully thought through.
01:56:42.840And I also think as well, and I know this puts me sort of on the outside of these things,
01:56:50.840but I also believe that the Maverick Party is not necessarily what they are pretending to be.
01:57:00.740And I believe that under the right political circumstances, that if the Federal Conservative
01:57:09.460Party can get its act together and become competitive on the national scene, that you
01:57:16.260would see the Maverick Party dissolve rather quickly, and most likely throw its support
01:57:24.660behind the federal conservatives well i throw a lot there at you i know so oh yeah no and we're
01:57:33.380coming towards the end that's fine i didn't bring you on to agree with everything i was saying or i
01:57:37.700would just talk throughout the entire thing and then people would get quite bored and i do agree
01:57:41.860with a good deal of it but it's good there's a lot to unpack a lot discussed and we're in a
01:57:47.380turning point of a pivotal year so i mean we'll be able to get together and talk about how our
01:57:52.500projections and uh ideas came about as time passes uh pre-election yet hopefully and post-election
01:57:59.720as well and and we carry on but it's the discourse that's important and you're offering a perspective
01:58:04.120from from halifax which we don't get a lot out here which is important because uh whether the
01:58:09.720secessionists uh among us here like it or not we are still in a confederation and these federal
01:58:14.840elections are all take you know the the participation of the entire country in them to
01:58:19.620determine who's going to win it or lose it in the end. So it's all well worth discussing. I really
01:58:25.060appreciate you coming on with me today for this first show. It was lots to cover and there's
01:58:30.460always lots more. And just on a different note, I do, setting aside anyone's personal
01:58:37.420preferences, either for the Liberals or the Conservatives or whatever, I do believe that
01:58:44.260it's imperative for the federal conservative party to be a competitive national party.
01:58:52.040And the reason I argue this is because in a parliamentary democracy like we have, no
01:58:58.680matter who is the current government, whether it's this liberal government or a potential
01:59:03.680future conservative government, you always want a functioning opposition that has the
01:59:55.080So just in closing, where can people, if they want to talk to you or find you or see what you're talking about, what you're up to, what's the best places to do so?
02:00:02.260Best place to find me is on Twitter, Clinton DeVoe.
02:00:06.000You can see the spelling of my name on the screen there.
02:00:09.120I write on a regular basis for Troy Media on issues of technology,
02:00:34.500Thank you very much again, and I'm sure we will be talking again.
02:00:38.420Okay. Well, that brought us right to the top of the hour here. Thank you, everybody. Thank you, Clinton. Thank you, Frank, and for you viewers, listeners, watchers, I'm tuning in on this first episode of this and a little bit of the technical difficulties which were to be anticipated, I guess, in our first round.
02:01:04.060So, tomorrow night, there will be a special with Daniel Smith again, and she'll be talking on COVID again, which, you know, is so important, and so few people are doing it now.
02:01:15.040And we will be back on Friday from 10 till noon to carry on with the Corey Morgan Show.
02:01:21.140If you got ideas, things you want covered, thoughts, send them on to me.