The federal standoff over CCP interference
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
176.78215
Summary
In this episode, former Prime Minister Stephen Harper sits down with former Speaker of the House of Commons, Jay Sheinfeld, to discuss the Trudeau government's handling of the corruption scandal surrounding the Panetta inquiry, and what can be done to force the opposition parties to join forces to force a confidence vote.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Thanks for coming in and talk to us today, Jay.
00:00:01.760
My pleasure, Corey. It's always nice to be on your show.
00:00:04.360
Yeah. And what I kind of said in the email, what I want to get to is we've had all of this federal
00:00:09.100
talk. We've had all of this political games going on for months. We have a federal government that's
00:00:14.180
in a minority position, but they still, it appears, to be able to skate on a public inquiry. Like,
00:00:21.340
I'm just wondering, are there parliamentary things that can be done to address this by
00:00:25.380
the opposition parties or are there hands tied? Well, first of all, absolutely. There are things
00:00:31.040
that can be done. I think you're well aware that I hold the dubious distinction of having been the
00:00:38.520
only member of parliament in the history of our Canadian parliament to hold the position of
00:00:43.800
caucus or party whip four times. My staff did some research and couldn't find any other time that
00:00:51.380
anybody had been in that position twice, let alone four times. And I've also been the house leader,
00:00:57.520
both in opposition for the chief opposition, but also for the government, which is a cabinet position,
00:01:06.780
as you know. So I'm very well versed in certainly in what can happen and how a government can be held
00:01:16.620
accountable. Certainly part of the reason why I decided to try something else other than public
00:01:24.260
life in 2010 was at the time I had reached the, basically the apex of my political career. I was
00:01:30.440
in cabinet, I was sort of sitting on the right hand of the prime minister at the time as the government
00:01:35.860
house leader or the leader of the government in the house of commons. And as such, in a minority
00:01:42.120
parliament, it's a very, very difficult position normally, certainly for a conservative it is,
00:01:47.540
because you have to negotiate with the other parties, Corey, bill by bill, motion by motion,
00:01:54.160
daily, sometimes hourly, to try and get anything done for the government's agenda to get it through
00:01:59.860
parliament. And of course, with conservatives, we don't have any natural allies. All the other parties
00:02:05.880
are, shall we say, left of centre. And so it was immensely stressful for the two minority parliaments
00:02:14.000
that we had from 2006 to 2011 until Prime Minister Harper won his one and only majority. So I fully
00:02:23.780
recognise what can be done and what can't be done when it comes to negotiating with the other parties.
00:02:30.180
Sadly, for Canadians, we have an opposition party, the NDP, under the leadership of Jagmeet Singh,
00:02:37.400
that has given our prime minister free reign to do whatever the hell he wants. And that's totally
00:02:44.320
unlike the way we were held accountable, Harper Conservatives, in those two minorities that I was
00:02:51.620
Yeah, well, and just the talking out of both sides of his mouth, though, whereas Jagmeet Singh has been
00:02:55.960
very critical, rightly so, of this whole scandal. I mean, see, we might as well call it that by now,
00:03:02.520
you know, the scandal of the Chinese Communist Party interference and the Trudeau government
00:03:06.200
working so hard to block an inquiry by all means. But, you know, he's tabling motions, a non-binding
00:03:11.640
motion, a non-binding motion. Well, big deal. It's virtue signalling. But are there things that can be
00:03:16.600
done that can force this then without bringing down the government? He's saying, okay, we'd have to,
00:03:22.160
it's not worth bringing the government down over right now. I mean, not all of us might agree, but
00:03:26.120
fine. But, you know, is it opposition day? Is there something they could put in as a bill or
00:03:30.760
something that can force this without turning it to a confidence matter?
00:03:34.480
Well, absolutely. I mean, the prime minister under our system always holds the Trump card,
00:03:40.780
Corey, I think you're aware of this, in so far as that he can declare any motion or any act,
00:03:47.500
any piece of legislation, a confidence motion, which means that if that motion is defeated,
00:03:54.600
if it falls, then we're into an election. That's what that means. But what we did,
00:04:03.160
what Stephen Harper did when prime minister and I as both his house leader and earlier as his
00:04:07.860
government whip, we negotiated on a continual basis with the other parties to say, okay, well,
00:04:14.660
how can we work with you to amend this so that it doesn't become a confidence measure? In fact,
00:04:20.680
we never played that so-called Trump card of declaring something a confidence unless we felt
00:04:27.880
very clearly that it was so integral to our government agenda for what we were trying to
00:04:34.760
accomplish for Canadians that we had no other choice. So that happened very rarely that we would
00:04:40.440
sort of have a showdown. And usually it was behind closed doors where you say, you know, face to face,
00:04:46.400
well, this is so much part of our electoral promises or whatever, that if you're insistent,
00:04:55.280
other house leaders, other whips about getting your caucuses to vote against it, and we lose this,
00:05:01.460
then we're going to go into an election. That's very rare under most circumstances.
00:05:05.820
The problem is, is that Jagmeet Singh never plays that card. He never, I'm sure he never says to
00:05:12.860
the prime minister, or maybe behind closed doors, the prime minister indicates all the time to him,
00:05:18.820
well, you know, if you go against this Jagmeet, we're going to be into an election. In other words,
00:05:23.360
he's playing that fear of a confidence motion constantly. Because stomping short of that,
00:05:29.640
there's lots that can be done. At committees, opposition days, as you say, in the House of
00:05:35.600
Commons, there's a few that are votable, that are actually driven to a vote, you could do a lot of
00:05:41.160
things. This is not the first scandal. There have been many. And the prime minister has done this,
00:05:48.560
prime minister Trudeau has done this repeatedly throughout the last number of years, where every
00:05:53.160
time a scandal comes up, he'll do everything possible to hide it from Canadians, even up to and
00:05:59.260
including calling an election, you know, which he did in 2021. So it's just really, it comes down to
00:06:09.340
having an extremely weak opposition party, led by someone that doesn't want to see an election,
00:06:16.820
because he fears for himself in his leadership position, and he fears for his party's fortunes.
00:06:23.380
Oh, yeah, and I understand that. I mean, Jagmeet Singh is as close to power as he will ever get. He
00:06:27.660
knows that, you know, come the next election, he might not be in such a position again. But I mean,
00:06:33.100
it just feels to me that it's a bluff that it can be called. I mean, you know, when you when you
00:06:39.120
declare something a confidence matter, that means that you're building a hill for yourself to die on.
00:06:43.280
You're saying we're gonna stand on this. And really, even Trudeau is as tone deaf as he can
00:06:48.100
seem to be, to go to Canadians, and we're going to call an early election, because I don't want to
00:06:53.780
go to an inquiry, I can't think of a more politically suicidal platform to go to the voters with, I just
00:06:59.920
don't think he would, he would do that. So to answer your question, yes, on opposition day,
00:07:05.780
certainly we had tremendous challenges at each and every committee. As you know, the procedure and
00:07:11.760
House Affairs Committee has been studying this issue, if you will, they called the
00:07:18.020
I forget what he's called now, reporter, Mr. Johnston, before them for a three hour testimony
00:07:29.360
about a week ago, I think a week ago yesterday. And, you know, put them on the hot seat asking
00:07:35.280
questions about why his report basically said, well, no, he didn't think a public inquiry was
00:07:41.700
necessary. Starting next month, had he stayed in his job before he resigned, he was going to start
00:07:47.480
public hearings. Well, public hearings do not have the strength and do not have all the tools that a
00:07:54.820
public inquiry have, as I'm sure you're aware. For example, a public inquiry is very much like the
00:08:00.860
powers of a standing committee, or even a special committee of the House of Commons. They have
00:08:06.660
rights very similar to courts, where they can subpoena you and say you will show up on this day
00:08:13.380
to give evidence and answer questions. Public hearings, which Mr. Johnston allegedly was going to do,
00:08:21.760
you cannot, they can, they can request, they can ask you to come. But if you sit, you know,
00:08:26.560
basically, say, go pound sand, nothing, nothing happened. So committees have that power. Jagmeet
00:08:34.740
Singh and the NDP have that power. They could easily, by dint of working with the other opposition
00:08:41.560
parties, they could easily force those issues at a committee and hold basically a full public inquiry
00:08:49.780
or something very similar to that at one of those committees. And you'll recall other instances over the
00:08:56.260
last number of years since Trudeau came to power in 2015, where committee started to do that. And
00:09:03.220
then eventually the NDP folded and didn't force it to go to its logical conclusion.
00:09:10.320
Okay, so they could start because I mean, people want answers. I mean, we're seeing it's rare when we
00:09:15.560
see such a dominant thing with polling and Canadians, the lack of faith in everything we've been hearing
00:09:20.320
out of this, you know, you're looking at 20 some percent of the people believing anything more out of the
00:09:25.500
Trudeau government when it comes to this issue. I mean, they still the numbers supporting the
00:09:30.000
government are higher than that. Okay, they don't want to go into election, but they want to get to
00:09:32.880
the bottom of this. They want to find out just what the heck is going on. I mean, we've had some
00:09:37.440
very direct meddling and it just flabbergasts me. I mean, our system isn't working like it should.
00:09:43.740
If we can't, in a minority situation, get a real deep dig into something this important,
00:09:48.900
it doesn't bode well for us. Well, and I think it really hinges to a large extent. And this is,
00:09:54.900
I say this very sort of sadly, that it hinges on the topic you were discussing just as I came into
00:10:01.340
the studio, which is the basic neutering of our national media. You know, why aren't they on to
00:10:12.040
Jagmeet? Why aren't they calling bullshit on Jagmeet Singh when he stands up and rants and raves
00:10:19.320
about scandal after scandal and does nothing when he has the power to do that? All he has to do is
00:10:26.340
sit down with the conservatives and block and say, okay, let's devise a common strategy of how to get
00:10:32.340
to the bottom of this at whichever committee, ethics committee, procedure and house affairs,
00:10:37.240
pick a committee, doesn't matter. They all have the same powers and say, we're going to work together
00:10:41.760
we have the majority of votes on that committee, because it's a minority government. And we're
00:10:47.560
going to force this starting tomorrow, next time that committee meets. And we have the power to have
00:10:54.100
that committee meet all summer, right through the heat of summer. You know, it doesn't have to rise
00:10:59.440
when the house rises, you know, next week or whenever it is. They have that power. But the media and the
00:11:07.740
public, you know, it's fine for, you know, the latest poll to say that 80% of Canadians, you know,
00:11:15.660
are opposed to this, the way the government is going on this issue, right? That's great. But is it
00:11:22.340
going to accomplish anything? Well, that's it. I mean, if their elected members can't bring about any,
00:11:28.960
you know, change or getting into this, you know, get, ask you to get, you know, a little speculative,
00:11:34.200
the time goes, goes fast. We still got a few minutes yet. But do you think we're going to get
00:11:38.640
a public inquiry eventually? I don't know. I mean, judging by the way that this prime minister is
00:11:46.720
skated around other issues, whether it's the SNC Lavalin thing, that should have brought him down.
00:11:51.860
I mean, my goodness, the Attorney General and Justice Minister of the country, Jody Wilson-Raybould,
00:11:58.860
resigned over it, wrote a book over it. And still Canadians put up with this? I mean, so when we
00:12:06.840
didn't over that, when we didn't over the we, he skated around that issue of trying to funnel
00:12:12.060
hundreds of millions of dollars to the we, a company that he was clearly in a conflict with,
00:12:18.900
with his members of his family receiving money for speaking engagements from that company,
00:12:25.140
the We Foundation. You know, so it's been one, and that's just two that come to mind.
00:12:30.180
I was looking online a few days ago out of curiosity, and I challenge your viewers to do this.
00:12:36.880
Go online and just Google Justin Trudeau scandals. It's page after page after page. It's almost impossible
00:12:44.340
for journalists to keep up with, and the few journalists like yourselves that actually want
00:12:49.160
to dig into it. So are we going to get one? You would think that logically he's going to be forced,
00:12:56.820
but it's only the media that can force him to do that. I don't understand why his own party is letting
00:13:02.480
this go on and on, because eventually, and I think we're reaching that point, that tipping point,
00:13:07.360
if you will, where his star is going to be so much in decline that it's going to be very difficult for
00:13:16.060
the Liberal Party to recover from it. That's where I wanted to go next, actually. I was just wondering
00:13:20.680
if that's one other area. I mean, there's got to, we know there's principled Liberal members of
00:13:24.880
Parliament, and they've got to be, you know, taking the flack from this stuff they had nothing to do
00:13:30.160
with. They're embarrassed. Their constituents are on their case, and they're looking to their own
00:13:33.600
political futures. Liberals, I mean, that's just a fact. They tend to be better at keeping them all
00:13:39.360
together than Conservatives. We love speaking out and ripping our own. I mean, that's our nature, but
00:13:44.240
at some point, as you said, that tipping point might be hit where enough in caucus, you might
00:13:49.660
finally get a caucus revolt, even if behind closed doors, but to say, look, that's enough. We're not
00:13:53.880
going to go down with this ship. Yeah, yeah, and it has happened in the past, I think, with both
00:13:58.900
governing parties, whether it's ours, the Conservative Party. Like you say, I think that
00:14:03.220
the record would show that within the Conservative Party, and it's both good and bad, that the
00:14:10.220
leadership is held more accountable than what we see in the Liberal Party. I mean, most recently,
00:14:15.880
Mr. O'Toole, right? It wasn't the general public or the media that eventually held him accountable.
00:14:23.480
It was his own caucus, and we don't see that from the Liberals, and as you say, I worked with,
00:14:29.380
well, partly because of the positions I held, I had to work daily, sometimes hourly, as I said, with
00:14:35.500
my counterparts, with the House leaders and the whips of all the other parties, and I found most of them
00:14:42.180
were very respectful and, you know, putting forward an alternate point of view, but you could work with
00:14:49.780
them. And so there are people in those ranks within the Liberal Party, the Liberal Caucus, that should
00:14:57.380
be holding him accountable, because they're not profiting. In fact, arguably, as you say, it's their
00:15:03.380
very futures that are in jeopardy because of the way that he acts. Every time one of these scandals
00:15:10.020
comes along where he does everything, well, and including, I think, on the one, I don't remember which it was,
00:15:15.760
where he actually launched a lawsuit against the Parliament of Canada to prevent them digging into
00:15:23.460
something. So, yeah, it's bizarre times. I mean, you know, another long shot, I'll throw out my
00:15:28.460
speculation, but it's not impossible to think that maybe at a point, Justin's going to take his walk
00:15:33.320
in the snow like his father did, and come back. I mean, that would be because he was getting the
00:15:37.280
pressure inside to think, you know what, maybe I'll just bail out now, move on, put it to a leadership
00:15:42.040
race, we can still kick the inquiry down the road, and maybe people will have forgotten about it,
00:15:45.560
and I can retire. Yeah, no, I think that everybody runs their term of office and has to come to that
00:15:53.340
decision, and some people are forced out. I've often remarked, I guess, that all too many
00:16:00.560
politicians, you know, are like bad milk in the fridge. I mean, they stay around until they start
00:16:05.720
to stink up the place. Well, yeah, I mean, even with great ones, it's been unfortunate, you know,
00:16:09.520
with Premier Klein's a good example of it. I mean, he's a legend in Alberta. He did a lot of great things,
00:16:14.760
but that last couple of years, it was kind of the hook was starting to come out, okay, Ralph,
00:16:18.560
maybe it's time to step aside, and he kind of left, you know, with his own party, he's turning
00:16:22.480
on him a little, which is, same with Kretchen, he was just in for too long, but just not seeing it
00:16:28.920
with Trudeau yet. No, we're not, and I think that partly because of a lot of things. We've never been
00:16:34.480
in a situation in our country where the major media has become the propaganda arm of the government
00:16:41.280
through subsidization. That's never happened before until Justin Trudeau. And so that puts
00:16:47.920
a very unique perspective on everything that's happening in and out of Ottawa. And had it not
00:16:55.280
been for that, there may have been enough pressure from multiple sources, not just the sort of the
00:17:00.980
lone, one of the lone voices in the wilderness, the Western Standard out here in Calgary is saying
00:17:06.980
these things, digging into these things, or rebel news, you know, they're very few and far between.
00:17:14.020
If you had some of the major networks doing the job they're supposed to do for Canadians,
00:17:18.700
I think they're, you know, maybe he would have already taken that walk.
00:17:22.940
Perhaps. Well, we'll see what happens. I said, you know, they're going to recess in a week or so.
00:17:28.040
I suspect they're going to kick this can down the road until fall, and we'll see if public interest
00:17:31.740
is still there when the time comes. I think so. It seems to me the leaks are going to keep coming.
00:17:35.800
Whoever that is, they've got more. They're not going to let this go.
00:17:39.620
Well, sadly, the message I want to leave your viewers with is that, don't make any mistake on
00:17:45.520
this. Jagmeet Singh and the NDP, every time you hear him say something critical of the government,
00:17:52.860
call him out for what it is. He's being a hypocrite. It's complete hypocrisy. He has the power
00:17:59.240
to work with the other opposition parties and drive these types of scandals to some form
00:18:05.880
of public disclosure at minimum. And he chooses, he and his caucus choose not to do that and instead
00:18:19.060
Well, time will tell. All right. Well, thanks again for coming in, Jay. I just appreciate some
00:18:22.500
explanation. You know, not everybody are political weenies like us that watch the procedure and what's
00:18:27.860
can be done and what can't be done, committees, things like that. And just, you know, the general
00:18:31.160
audience, like they're frustrated, readers and what can be done, just the confirmation that
00:18:35.920
something can be done. They're just choosing not to and, well, we'll see what happens.
00:18:41.160
Well, Canadian democracy, especially in this case, Canadian democracy is the poorer for it. I mean,
00:18:46.920
I think that's why it's 80% of Canadians is because there is an awakening to the fact that foreign
00:18:53.880
interference in our election strikes at the very heart of everything that we stand for. I mean,
00:19:00.820
a democracy has to stand on the legitimacy of its elections. Absolutely. All right. Well,
00:19:07.020
thanks, Jay. It was great seeing you in here again. And thanks for asking me. We can have you back
00:19:11.700
again sometime soon, maybe to start talking about the next election. Hopefully we'll be into it
00:19:18.400
sooner rather than later, because the country is going to be destroyed if it keeps going the way
00:19:22.260
it is. It does seem to be. All right. Thank you. So that was Jay Hill, as you heard. And yes,
00:19:28.280
a regular guest here, a person who's certainly put in a long time of service on Parliament Hill and still
00:19:34.240
managed to maintain his marbles out of all that time in there. It's quite surprising.
00:19:38.560
Canadian Shooting Sports Association, without the CSSA, our gun rights would have been taken long,
00:19:44.140
long ago. These guys are on the front lines, helping to draft smart and intelligent firearms
00:19:49.800
regulations and legislation in Canada. And more importantly, educating the public about how we
00:19:55.820
keep guns out of the hands of the wrong people. We've become a member. It's absolutely worth every penny.