THE PIPELINEļ¼ Did Danielleās demands workļ¼
Episode Stats
Words per minute
188.87738
Harmful content
Misogyny
16
sentences flagged
Hate speech
11
sentences flagged
Summary
The OG Pipeline crew talks abortion, the recall against Alberta's UCP MLAs, and much, much more. Plus, a new documentary explores the controversial topic of late-term abortions in Canada. Thanks to our sponsor, The OG Pipeline!
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Good day. Today is November 26, 2025. I'm Derek Fildebrandt,
00:00:29.040
publisher of the Western Standard, and you're watching The Pipeline. I'm here with the OG
00:00:33.780
Pipeline crew, former Western Standard opinion editor, Nigel Hannaford.
00:00:41.200
And Western Standard senior Alberta columnist, Corey Morgan.
00:00:45.780
All right. Well, we're going to get into one topic that no one likes to talk about because
00:00:50.940
everyone gets angry. We'll probably maybe even get angry with each other on this show here.
00:00:56.040
Uh, we're talking about late term abortions in Canada. We're told it's exceptionally rare
00:01:01.820
and only in medically necessary, uh, situations. Um, a new documentary out would seem to show,
00:01:10.860
I think fairly definitively, that that is very much not the case. Um, so we're going to be
00:01:15.940
talking about a very, about the touchiest subject you could find in Canada, almost anywhere really,
00:01:22.400
but, uh, we're going to, we're going to talk about late term abortions. Um, the total recall
0.95
00:01:29.040
against, uh, Alberta UCP MLAs continues. I think we're up to what, six or eight or so
00:01:35.700
somewhere around there. Uh, 14 now. 14 who have bad approved petitions?
00:01:40.220
I believe so, yeah. Okay. But I mean, it's just an application form. It's really-
00:01:43.680
Yeah, yeah. It doesn't mean much yet. But, uh, efforts to recall essentially the whole, uh,
00:01:48.500
enough UCP MLAs to collapse the government for an election, I guess. Be careful what
00:01:52.780
you wish for, guys. I'm not sure you want an election right now. But, uh, some people
00:01:57.680
are saying that that process is being abused. We need to change the recall legislation.
00:02:03.520
Hmm. I'm not, I'm not so sure. You want recall, you got to accept it when it's used against
00:02:08.680
you too. But we'll get into it. But first, did Daniel Smith's demands of Mark Carney's federal
00:02:14.960
liberal government work? Um, she, uh, the premier laid down a series of nine demands. I think it may
00:02:24.040
have been earlier in the summer, maybe even the spring. It was some time ago. She laid down
00:02:28.380
these demands. Um, and this is all in the background of the looming, likely-ish, uh, Alberta
00:02:36.560
referendum on independence coming, saying, look, if you, uh, it was kind of an or else. And she
00:02:41.140
didn't say what the or else was, but it was more or else. I'm not going to be doing much
00:02:46.440
on the, uh, stay side of the referendum. Uh, I think it was kind of the implication. Not
00:02:51.760
sure if that's fair or not. But, uh, she laid out these demands. They were not all about
00:02:57.380
oil and gas development and pipelines, but I'd say the bulk of them were. There were some
00:03:02.520
items on equalization. Surprise! There hasn't been a peep on equalization. Nothing will ever
00:03:08.140
seem to change there. Um, but there does, knock on wood, appear to be some movement on the natural
00:03:15.280
resource development side of things. Tomorrow, Thursday, Daniel Smith and Mark Carney are
00:03:20.460
appearing at the Chamber of Commerce, where they're going to sign or present a memorandum of
00:03:25.820
understanding. MOUs actually don't really mean anything. They're just kind of, it's an agreement
00:03:30.160
to an agreement. Uh, I was a bureaucrat for one year of my life and we signed an MOU. I was like,
00:03:35.820
oh my God, this is a big deal. It was on internal free trade in Canada. Guess what? Nothing came of
00:03:40.380
it. We spent years on it to get an MOU and nothing came. So, uh, but, you know, so it's about exceptions
00:03:48.240
from the emissions caps, uh, exceptions from the, uh, Northwest coast tanker ban, um, the things like
00:03:58.340
that that would make a pipeline feasible. Um, but David EB is saying, wait a minute, you can't treat
00:04:07.480
me like an Albertan. I get to have some say in this. And so he, he, he's squawking that, uh, he
00:04:12.480
hasn't been consulted and given his permission. Uh, some of the BC native bands are saying something
00:04:18.320
similar. Um, I don't know. Do we have much to cheer about yet?
00:04:23.680
I don't think so. Uh, you know, I, I would actually love to be cheering about this, but
00:04:28.460
here in Alberta, we spend so much time thinking about it from our point of view that we don't
00:04:34.420
always think about how the federal government is seeing it and how Mr. Carney in particular
00:04:40.100
is seeing it. No, I mean, what does, yeah, we've got nine demands. What does, what does Mr.
00:04:46.460
Carney have that he wants to, to get done? He wants the problem to go away. He wants actually
00:04:53.540
the appearance of a settlement. He's just come back from a meeting in Brazil where everybody was
00:05:00.680
talking about how to, uh, how, how to take the carbon out of the climate. And now he's got to come
00:05:07.720
back and he's expected to do work out something with the premier of Alberta who wants to develop
00:05:13.080
more oil. So what he's doing is building a situation where it looks like he's agreeing, but he's got an
00:05:21.900
escape route. He won't have to go through with it. I am very pessimistic about, uh, this, this, uh,
00:05:27.920
particular, uh, I mean, I hope I'm wrong, but I actually don't see any good coming out of this.
00:05:34.320
He has, apart from a constituency that's interested in climate change, he himself has made it very clear
00:05:41.820
how he sees the climate change. He wants to, he wants to get less carbon emitted. He's come up with
00:05:51.040
this crazy idea that in order to produce oil in the West, you must dairy an equivalent amount of
00:06:00.280
carbon dioxide to what it took to, to make the oil, nothing like that in the East where they're
00:06:04.660
importing it. And now you just mentioned the condition that BC has to agree. And the indigenous
00:06:13.520
peoples there have to agree. There is his escape route. They will not agree. Thanks Danielle. It
00:06:19.560
was great talking, but we're not, we're not doing anything because BC doesn't agree. Well, wait a
00:06:24.280
minute. You intruded in our space, provincially intrude on theirs. Well, you're out.
00:06:29.620
Well, bring the bowl of water. Wash my hands of it. Yeah. Well, Corey, none of this requires
00:06:37.780
intrusion actually on provincial jurisdiction, uh, interprovincial trade of this kind, the
00:06:43.340
infrastructure crossing provincial and national boundaries or international boundaries is strict
00:06:47.960
federal jurisdiction. The Supreme court ruled on that. That was, you know, one of the rare times
00:06:53.120
where the Supreme courts actually made a sensible, it's written in black and white in the British
00:06:57.880
North America act that assigns the powers one way or another. So it's, it's pretty clear that
00:07:02.540
that's, that's federal jurisdiction. Uh, the court ruled the David E.B. and the BC and D.P. have no
00:07:07.300
standing, whatever, constitutional standing, whatever to interfere. Uh, but I mean, we haven't seen the
00:07:14.840
MOU yet, so I, I don't want to prejudge it. I just think as Albertans, we've, uh, you know, we've,
00:07:21.500
we've played the Charlie Brown football enough by now that maybe we're overly cynical. I don't know.
00:07:27.880
Are we overly cynical here? Or like, is he going to be, are BC natives and the BC government,
00:07:34.540
um, which one of those seniors soon will, who knows, but, uh, are, are, are they going to,
00:07:40.700
you expect they'll actually be given a real veto of some kind or it's just, you know, the MOU
00:07:45.580
will require some basic duty to consult, which would, that's fine. I actually think that's,
00:07:51.300
that's, that's appropriate. Uh, I don't know. Am I overly cynical?
00:07:55.180
Well, part of it is, uh, you're not overly cynical and, uh, part of it, as I was saying
00:07:58.860
to Nigel earlier, and I, I've got limited what I could say, but a little bird told me
00:08:02.160
there is nothing in the MOU that does give a veto to the First Nations or the province
00:08:08.160
of BC, nor should it, because it's not constitutional, as you pointed out, both with First Nations
00:08:12.360
and BC. So Carney has to be a prime minister and he doesn't seem to be willing to. This is
00:08:18.840
fully in his hands. He, he says it's getting done or it's not. And what's missing in all of
00:08:24.500
this, I think are not enough discussion. Maybe that'll pop over the MOU. Where's the private
00:08:28.020
proponent? That's the excuse they like using too. There's no private proponent. Well, none of them
00:08:31.060
are going to, unless they can get through. So they need to see something with the prime minister
00:08:38.480
saying this pipe is going to reach the coast, not this pipe. If we meet this giant long list
00:08:44.900
of conditions, well, nobody's going to pull their wallet out there. No, he's got to be saying,
00:08:48.420
I support this and I'm going to facilitate it. And we can't say that, oh, we'll need 10,
00:08:53.380
20 years of consultation either, because it's been done already. The Northern Gateway,
00:08:58.340
Enbridge already spent, what, a hundred and some million or some, they've done the consultation.
00:09:04.100
I know it expired, but you know what? The mountains are in the same place. The rivers are
00:09:07.220
in the same spot. If anything, pipelines have gotten even better. We have to fast track this or it's not
00:09:13.780
happening. So it's going to be interesting as you say, leading into an AGM for Premier Smith to get
00:09:18.420
out and try and tell the members she has accomplished something. And there has been progress
00:09:25.460
because they're as cynical as we are for the most part. And they want to see her either standing up
00:09:30.660
for Alberta or actually having an agreement that says this pipe is going to go not, oh, we've got
00:09:35.700
another MOU. We're going to talk about it for 10 more years while it dies on the vote.
00:09:39.700
Corey, to your point, the Western Standard has today published the following comment by Mr. Carney
00:09:46.340
in the House of Commons. Word for words, the memorandum of understanding that we're negotiating
00:09:51.940
with Alberta creates the necessary conditions, but not sufficient conditions because we believe in
00:09:59.220
cooperative federalism. We believe the government of BC has to agree. We believe that First Nations,
00:10:05.940
right holders in this country have to agree and support all stakeholders. So they're already, he
00:10:12.260
has laid down conditions under which he says, well, I did my best.
00:10:15.700
And there's already First Nations saying that they're never going to support it under any
00:10:19.460
circumstances. That's where we got to get, we got to define that difference between consultation and
00:10:23.060
consent. We aren't obligated to get consent. And obviously they're saying they're never going to give
00:10:27.060
it. So at this point, it's either tell them to go get stuffed. We're doing this or just give up.
00:10:32.740
So I don't know how much of this is Carney saying one thing. I'm not sure if that was
00:10:36.500
in response to an MVP question or conservative question. I think it was conservatives were
00:10:40.820
Yeah. So I have a hard time believing that Danielle Smith is going to be willing to stand
00:10:47.540
next to Mark Carney at a press conference and put her name to something that would give BC and
00:10:54.820
native groups in BC a veto one day before the opening of the UCP convention where she's going to face the
0.98
00:11:01.860
most hardcore folks in the right who are, I mean, we've been around these folks, they eat leaders
00:11:08.980
for brunch. So, you know, when she goes into there, she likes to flex her Alberta first bona fides.
0.99
00:11:15.300
So I'm hesitant to think that she's going to do this one day before facing that kind of crowd.
00:11:23.460
Well, from what I've heard, like I said, that's not in the MOU. So that perhaps tomorrow, it might
00:11:29.140
be an interesting conference because if that comes to the opportunity where she might have to put him
0.57
00:11:32.420
on the spot there and say, well, just to clarify, this is not giving a veto to such and such and make
00:11:38.900
him answer it there, because he was absent from question period on this today anyway. So that would
00:11:44.020
be a whole different question. Now, if it was a sabotage, I mean, we really want to see provincial
00:11:47.220
federal relations go bad, you know, during a conference where they're supposed to be holding
00:11:50.580
hands and smiling. But I mean, if she's being undercut before this thing's even signed, perhaps
00:11:56.020
the premier will have a good enough cause to put him to the question while they're standing in front
00:12:00.100
of the cameras. Yeah, I mean, it is. I mean, the United Conservative Party very much inherited
00:12:09.380
from the Wild Rose, the kind of Alberta first strain of DNA in that party's blood. Actually,
00:12:18.580
in many ways, I think the UCP is more Alberta first than the Wild Rose was. I think that's just
00:12:23.540
the Overton window of shit. Well, it's just that the issues are more prescient now, too,
00:12:27.220
than they had been at that time. Yeah. So I mean, the politics, it's always good politics
00:12:34.020
for the Alberta UCP premier to be fighting like hell against the federal liberal prime minister.
00:12:39.380
That's that's good politics. So for her to not play that card and stand next to him at a podium
1.00
00:12:46.180
the day before convention leads me to think in all probability, I mean, maybe she's lost her marbles
00:12:51.700
and gone soft. But in all probability, I would bet that she's got a fair degree of faith in it,
00:12:59.220
because I she doesn't like, you know, that there's going to be some people on the harder
00:13:05.300
independence, sovereignty, right side of the party who are critics, and they're going to just take
00:13:10.980
a picture of her standing at a podium. And that's a bad meme. That's a bad meme. So if she's going to
00:13:16.180
give them that, she's probably got to have a fair degree of certainty that no, this is a real thing.
00:13:22.420
Well, I think it's going to go one way or the other. There can be a mushy middle on this.
00:13:26.740
She has to be standing at that podium to have something that can be taken to the bank. Like
0.90
00:13:31.460
this is an agreement, and she has to have the prime minister very strongly saying this is going to get
00:13:35.300
done. Or if it's some mushy, we're just signing this again, and we're going to tread water for months,
00:13:40.340
as you said, well, then something has made her addled because she understands that nobody going
00:13:44.580
into an AGM wants a mushy middle position, or if it blows up tomorrow, that goes well going into an AGM
00:13:52.420
as well, because then you give the fire and brimstone speech saying, we tried, we did everything we could.
00:13:57.620
I took my time the day before this to try and come out and do this. And he torpedoed us before we could
00:14:01.940
even get it rolling. I guess we have to look at other alternatives as Albertans to get our resources to
00:14:06.580
market. But a middle is not going to look good. Yeah. And you know, this is in the context of a
00:14:12.980
probable referendum some point next year on independence. And thank you for all your hard
00:14:19.220
work on that, Thomas Nkazic. I appreciate you volunteering your time and your Winnebago or
00:14:26.500
whatever, driving around Alberta, getting signatures so that we can have a vote on independence. It was very
00:14:31.060
generous of the cause. He is forward thinking sometimes.
00:14:36.580
God, you just can't make this shit up sometimes.
00:14:39.380
Yeah. He was probably buzzing from the hairspray and wasn't thinking clearly.
00:14:42.820
Yeah. Yeah. Um, but anyway, we're, you know, there's a probable referendum on independence coming.
00:14:50.020
I mean, if there is tangible, like you got a shovel in the ground somewhere, I mean, it's no pipeline
00:14:57.300
is going to get be done and pumping by that time. I'd be honest, that's not reasonable.
00:15:00.500
But if you had a shovel in the ground by the time people vote, uh, I think it would make it
00:15:07.380
damn near impossible for the independent side to win that. And I, and I think it is sad that
00:15:11.700
the whole independence argument gets reduced through just pipelines. It is a hell of a lot
00:15:16.580
more than pipe. In fact, it should maybe be at the bottom of the top five list at this point. I'd say
00:15:24.820
controlling our simple borders might be at the top. If we can't control the Canadian border,
00:15:28.980
then let's at least control the Alberta border. Um, a lot of things, but, uh, I think in terms of
00:15:36.340
the discussion, I mean, the independent side always had the much bigger hill to climb to have any chance
00:15:41.380
of winning. If, if there's real progress and it's like, yeah, no, we're actually building this.
00:15:46.180
There's crews out there right now. There's pictures, there's video of guys digging holes
00:15:50.340
and laying pipe. I, I, I think that kills the chance of winning an independence vote.
00:15:55.780
It would indicate that other things can get done as well. I mean, that's one symbol. So we're saying,
00:15:59.380
well, if it could be negotiated to get a pipeline through, then maybe it's possible to negotiate on
00:16:04.180
immigration or negotiate on, uh, equalization or some of those other areas. So it will be a big
00:16:10.100
symbolic win that would undercut the independence movement, uh, strongly, but they got to move fast.
00:16:14.740
You know, people are impatient. That's the bottom line. They don't want to see it. I mean,
00:16:18.180
Kearney loves his hockey analogies. Well, it looks to us like he's ragging the puck and we're not,
00:16:23.780
people don't have time for it anymore. You get something going or quit playing us.
00:16:27.380
Well, people in Alberta don't have any time for it anymore. Maybe this plays really well
00:16:35.620
He's taking the cousins to Alberta and he's going to lay about the Alberta government.
00:16:40.340
Tell them exactly where they stand. That's good. That won't play well in Alberta,
00:16:44.900
but that could be Chris to his mill in Ontario, Quebec.
00:16:47.860
Yeah. We can't always look at it for our lenses.
00:16:49.860
Well, that's the thing we get. It's very easy to forget what might be in it for him.
00:16:54.740
Yeah. Cause where does some of his MPs are getting pretty upset with the possibility.
00:16:58.180
Some of the BC ones who are kind of doctrinaire on this stuff.
00:17:01.700
All right. Well, speaking of laying into the Alberta government, um,
00:17:04.580
let's talk about the recall campaign. We've gotten into this before. So this is coming out of the
00:17:12.580
Alberta UCP government, uh, legislating an end to the teacher strike, uh, sending them back to work.
00:17:20.820
They still legislated them a sweetheart deal. I mean, it was a great frigging deal that they got for
00:17:25.140
themselves. I thought the UCP should have legislated them back to work with a pay cut.
00:17:28.500
Um, like not even more charter schools to be transferred. As you said, I liked that.
00:17:34.100
Yeah. Yeah. Actually, I don't think they actually should have legislated them back to work. I think
00:17:37.060
they just should have said every day, convert a public school into a charter school until the
00:17:40.420
union begs for an end to the strike. Um, walk them out essentially, I'd say, uh, that's not what
00:17:46.340
happened. Anyway, the ATA was legislated back to work. They lost their shit. They went, uh, they got
00:17:51.540
very, very angry. The notwithstanding clause was used. So it's just bulletproof from a legal challenge
00:17:56.420
because the Supreme Court's made some bizarre rulings in the last years where, uh, apparently
00:18:04.100
individual rights are also now union rights. They, unions have the same rights as individuals. So, um,
00:18:12.340
they lost their mind and they decided to, uh, initiate recall campaigns against Alberta UCP MLAs.
00:18:19.140
Some of them seem pretty dumb. They're going after MLAs who had massive margins of victory. I guess
00:18:25.460
Daniel Smith had a big margin of victory in Brooks Medicine Hat, but she's the premier. She's very
00:18:29.380
symbolic. So they may as well take a shot at that. I guess, um, you know, they're going after other
00:18:34.820
ones who have big margins of victory, like up in Grand Prairie. Uh, and then other ones. Now,
00:18:40.020
the one that I think is probably their smartest to go after. Sorry, Demetrius is the education minister.
00:18:44.660
He's symbolic. He's the education minister. They hate him. And Calgary Bowl had an extremely,
00:18:48.900
uh, his constituency in Calgary Bowl had a very, very narrow margin of victory for him.
00:18:54.740
So strategically or tactically, that that's a, that's maybe a smarter one, but they're going
00:18:58.580
after all sorts of others. Angela Pitt, she had a pretty big margin of victory. Um,
00:19:03.700
but they're going after them very clearly based on government policy. And a lot in the UCP are
00:19:10.820
stating that, well, that's not fair game. Um, we need to change the rules around here. Now,
00:19:15.780
some of it, I think is more legitimate complaints. Like, uh, the legislation says that the people who
00:19:21.540
are canvassing for signatures have to live in the constituency. I actually don't think that should
00:19:25.940
be a rule necessarily because constituencies, as I could tell my experience, get gerrymandered.
00:19:31.620
I strongly differ on that part. Yeah, it is. Okay. But, but, or, or maybe they have to at least
00:19:36.500
be in an adjacent one because, because constituencies, particularly urban ones, I mean,
00:19:41.700
you live on one side of a street, you're in one constituency, you live on the other side of the street,
00:19:45.780
you're in another. And it's just some, some dink sitting in a commission somewhere appointed by
0.98
00:19:50.420
political parties who drew that. Sometimes. Well, I know it. I live 800 meters from a UCP
00:19:56.580
member and I have an NDP member for mine. I'm half a mile out of the border and they gerrymandered it
00:20:01.220
actually because they wanted an NDP rural seat. So they made that one. It frustrates me, but I still
00:20:06.580
think when it comes to overturning an MLA, it should only be the people living under that constituency.
00:20:11.460
In an election, you're allowed to campaign in any constituency you want. In fact, people come
00:20:14.820
from other provinces, even other countries in campaign. Yeah. So, you know, if you're allowed
00:20:18.420
to go and volunteer to elect someone in a different riding, we do it in general elections and by
00:20:22.820
elections, I think you should be allowed to do it for recall too. And you know, let's remember a lot
00:20:27.060
of people who are against what's happening with recall here right now. Uh, we were all gearing up to
00:20:33.060
recall Jason Kenney, but from the right. Yeah. Uh, but that was province wide. That was, uh, no, but to
00:20:39.300
recall him in his own seat. He was going to probably end up getting recalled if, if potential until, uh,
00:20:43.700
essentially the party recalled him by forcing a leadership review of him. They recalled him at the
00:20:48.180
leadership level, but he was good to otherwise probably get recalled at the MLA level.
00:20:53.460
So I guess there's two points. One is the rules are you have to live in the ride. I don't think it's a good
00:20:58.980
rule, but that is the rule. And that appears very much to be aggressively violated by the organizers
00:21:03.780
here. Um, I think the UCB have got a point there, even if I think it's a bad part of the law where I
00:21:10.500
think they don't have a point is they're saying, well, you're just disagreeing with us on government
00:21:14.020
policy. You have to have a very specific reason, some kind of misconduct to recall someone.
00:21:21.060
I don't think so. Again, you've got, you know, what's, what's, what's a big deal for someone might
00:21:28.500
not be like Bev Oda. People got pissed off at $28 glass of orange juice. I mean, this part was
00:21:34.180
15, 16, sorry. With inflation, it's 28 years. Um, $16 glass of orange juice. That is not a serious
00:21:40.420
thing, but it blew up into a serious thing. So then is a judge going to sit there and say, well,
00:21:44.660
this is worthy of recall. And this is not, um, broken promises. Sometimes promises are legitimately
00:21:51.780
broken. You made a promise. He got in. Turns out the facts on the ground are different, or the
00:21:55.780
government's got no money. Hey, we don't actually have money for this anymore. Are we really going
00:22:00.180
to let, uh, have a court decide if someone, if a politician broke his promise or if this scandal
00:22:06.340
is serious or non-serious? I think the UCP are kind of grasping at straws on this thing saying that,
00:22:11.860
well, you have to have a better reason that you disagree with the government policy.
00:22:14.740
They pulled the trigger on the government's own policy. It's the sort of thing I've done in the past.
00:22:17.940
Uh, my NDP nomination run when they left it wide open for anybody to register
00:22:21.780
policies against it. And be on there. And then it's amazing. They changed their policies within
00:22:25.460
two weeks and suddenly I disappeared as an NDP nomination candidate. Let's make sure we pull up
00:22:30.020
a picture from, uh, Corey's nomination there. He's a reference and I ran hard. Yeah. You ran for
00:22:35.060
the nomination. It was a bath can ask us. Yes. Yes. You had the, pardon the language,
00:22:39.060
you had the pussy hat and everything. Yeah. It was probably dressed in NDP wear for the time.
1.00
00:22:43.220
Yeah. And then they shut down my campaign. Uh, but that's using their, their policies against them.
0.99
00:22:47.540
That's what they're doing with the recall. Uh, as annoying as it may be, it's fair
00:22:50.980
game. It is. And I don't think as long as those rules are followed, that they're going to succeed
00:22:55.300
in many, if any of them, as you said, Highwood, they're going after RJ Sigurdsson. They've never
00:23:01.060
had under 70% support for the UCP there. I would not want to be a door knocker going to the door
00:23:06.420
saying, Hey, will you sign this petition with your name address? Cause that's the thing people got to
00:23:10.420
realize, but right now, all they're doing is putting in a form and a fee. Anybody can do that.
00:23:14.900
Yeah. That takes 20 minutes. Yeah. Uh, the news is reporting it as if there's this wave.
00:23:19.140
Well, then there's a vote on if there will be a bioactive. Yeah. So this is a long process. So
00:23:25.300
you have to get signatures from 60% of the people who voted in the last election within a timeframe.
00:23:30.500
You can't flood it with outside help and rest assured there will be a lot of UCP supporters
00:23:35.620
who will want to see a couple of violations. Cause that'll give them an excuse to say this is
00:23:39.220
invalid and thrown out. Uh, as you said, cover bow is maybe the closest they could come to it.
00:23:44.100
But even then that's a tough task. I mean, not everybody's eager to see a
00:23:47.220
by-election or whatnot. Even some who don't like the, the MLA, they might say, well, I'll still
00:23:51.860
hang on till, uh, the next election. Like I like recall and referendum legislation. I like using
00:23:57.220
Switzerland as a model, but something that's different there is the citizens take it very
00:24:00.740
seriously. So if somebody shows up with a frivolous campaign at their door and says,
00:24:04.500
will you sign this? They'll say, no, I'm not interested. Not that Canadian politeness.
00:24:08.020
So I'll just sign. No, it just, I don't like this. I won't sign. So it's incumbent,
00:24:13.460
I think on the same time for that culture to develop here. Like they haven't had initiative.
00:24:17.380
We haven't had recall, no, any practical way. Pretty much now they're putting it to the test.
00:24:21.700
And you know, it really wants people, if people get the idea that this is a serious
00:24:27.220
effort by the opposition to defrone the government, not just take out an MLA who has been an idiot,
0.54
00:24:36.340
then the tide is going to turn against this recall. Now that's the thing. They have to get that message
00:24:42.020
out because otherwise people are saying, oh, whatever, you know.
00:24:46.180
Yeah. Like different stuff. But the complaint is saying, like the UCP is talking about
00:24:51.460
changing some of the rules. They haven't said definitively. Yeah.
00:24:55.060
I'm not sure how you can, because it comes pretty subjective when you're getting into
00:24:58.500
what he is or isn't. It really should be. I've been disagreeing.
00:25:01.380
I think on a communications front, you can say that these guys are being frivolous or wrong.
00:25:05.220
Just don't change the rules. Like the example I use is, is Dara Hetherington. I keep bringing her up.
00:25:09.380
And for those who remember, you might not have been in Alberta at the time yet. She was a city
00:25:13.300
councillor in Lethbridge who went very much off the rails, a fake kidnapping story, took off to Las
00:25:18.660
Vegas, very bizarre, but they couldn't get rid of her. She, she still had that seat on council and as
0.99
00:25:24.500
loopy as she'd been and so on, she potentially could have been stuck in there for years because
0.76
00:25:29.700
you just have no mechanism to have somebody, even though they've proven themselves just to,
00:25:34.900
you know, she needed treatment, not a seat. You know, I mean, just, it's a mental health thing.
00:25:39.860
Oh no. Are you sure it's left? I thought it was in Edmonton.
00:25:43.060
It was an Edmonton councillor who would do that.
00:25:44.340
Well, you're thinking of, uh, uh, uh, Tucker Gomberg. And that poor fellow ended up committing
00:25:49.300
suicide jumping off Confederation Bridge. He wanted to flood the Edmonton city streets to build,
00:25:56.820
Yeah. But he was a city councillor, but similar sorts of things. You see, when they are so clearly,
00:26:00.580
though, something has happened or whatever, or they've done something where they just are no
00:26:03.620
longer fit, we don't have a mechanism to remove them. But theoretically, it should just only be
00:26:08.500
when it gets that bad before you really start doing it. But how do you put, how do you put
00:26:15.380
That's the problem. And I'm not saying this is the UCP's plan. It's not as far as we know, but
00:26:20.020
you know, some prominent voices within it are saying, you know, and some of the MLAs being subject to
00:26:24.020
this are saying, well, no, the rules should say like, there has to be clear misconduct. Well,
00:26:28.420
that means that's going to become a legal case. And yeah, misconduct's a different thing too.
00:26:33.460
Yeah. Okay. So like Sean Chu, the Calgary city councillor, uh, was in some pretty hot water,
00:26:38.260
but he was never charged and convicted with a crime. He did some things which were questionable
00:26:43.780
a long time ago and voters deserve to render their decision. Uh, but he kind of, the way with
00:26:50.500
advanced voting, he still got elected, couldn't be recalled. Okay. But is it always criminal behavior?
00:26:56.660
Like not many are going to be, I think criminal makes it more clear. They'll often just resign
00:27:01.300
its race anyways, but, uh, it's, it's those, but also what, like, what if it's, um, you know,
00:27:06.100
a politician refuses to hand over their gun to the cops. Okay. Well that's criminal technically,
00:27:12.740
but so, okay. Like it just gets way too subjective. You have recall or you don't have recall. And the
00:27:20.500
general rule of thumb is you're going to agree with the reason what it's a politician you don't want,
00:27:24.500
don't like, and you want to recall. And you're going to disagree with it when it's a politician
00:27:27.620
you do like, who's on your side. Well, if the person's principled, they wouldn't. I mean,
00:27:30.820
I wouldn't want to see one against Nietzsche because it would just be a waste of paper,
00:27:34.020
a waste of pounding the street. I'd love to see Nietzsche gone. I've got no use for the man.
00:27:37.220
But I wouldn't sign the petition. He was popularly elected in, in Edmonton Strathcona. Nobody
00:27:42.500
other than NDP is ever going to win that seat. Quit wasting time. Let's get on the bigger issues.
00:27:47.700
But yeah, well, it's interesting to see what's going to happen because if they come out and
00:27:50.820
shoot down their own legislation, it will undercut the ECP. It'll look bad. It would
00:27:55.300
look bad if they did. I think they could, you know, there's some tweaking on the administrative
00:27:59.940
side. I actually think you should not have to live specifically in it in the constituency because
00:28:04.980
the boundaries are so often arbitrary. You're on one side of the street or you're on the other.
00:28:08.500
I think maybe they should say you have to live in it or in an adjacent riding to it. So like
00:28:12.340
you're living in the general area. So even a gerrymandered riding, people who are naturally a part
0.83
00:28:17.620
of that area can still participate. I think that... But can't vote.
00:28:21.140
Well, no, no. Only people in that riding can vote and sign a petition to recall, but they could go
00:28:26.020
into there and, you know, carry... Up on jurors and carry petitions.
00:28:29.700
Yeah, because we allow it for elections. Why would we not allow it for this? That's...
00:28:32.900
Well, maybe we shouldn't allow it for elections. But with elections, it's a party and it's a
00:28:35.780
provincial-wide thing, which is a little different. I mean, we know exactly what will happen if you
00:28:41.620
You got to buy elections. You got to buy elections. Yeah.
00:28:42.980
People come in from around the country to go for a bargain. And that's what will happen with these
00:28:47.700
if we open it right up. So old Gil and his gang of union hacks are just going to flood into a
00:28:51.780
constituency and pound every door a hundred times over. People will sign just to get these union nuts
00:28:56.340
to stop harassing them. Well, that's what people were going to do against J.C. Kenney. But from the
00:28:59.460
right, get rid of them. They shouldn't have done that either on the local level. Get rid of them as
00:29:03.860
a leader. But as far as an MLA goes, I think that's up to the constituents. Yeah. Well, in this case,
00:29:08.340
the conservatives have a fairly thin majority. So actually, if you got just a few, boom, all of a
00:29:13.940
sudden, the government's lost its majority. And at that point, you're not going to get
00:29:17.060
by-alarm. The premier just calls an election. Yeah. Which is what would happen.
00:29:20.580
That's what would happen. And I mean, you never know what's going to happen. But based on the polls,
00:29:25.540
I don't think it's going to be... You'll be a careful what you wish for
00:29:29.460
circumstances like Fabio and his referendum petition. Thanks again, John. Thanks for that. Thanks for
00:29:36.260
calling an early election. Because I tell you, there's a lot of people in the ECP who would
00:29:40.820
like to call an early election right now. Renew their mandate. They're strong in the polls.
00:29:44.740
They got money in the bank. They're ready for an election. But it looks bad to call an early
00:29:49.780
election, especially when you've got a fixed election date. Daniel Smith remembers what happened
00:29:52.900
to Jim Prentiss. Yeah. I mean, this would give them all the excuse that they need. That'd be a pretty
00:29:58.020
good one. Okay. Oh, geez. Okay. We're going to talk about this one. Late-term abortions.
00:30:10.580
So I think what's called Right Now, it's a kind of student pro-life group came out to put out
00:30:18.180
a documentary around late-term abortions. And then what's the term? Live birth abortions,
00:30:26.580
which is about the most horrific form it can take. I mean, we're told late-term... Canada is
00:30:36.260
pretty much the only country, if not the only country on the planet that has no legislative
00:30:40.980
framework of any kind around abortion. It's just kind of a black hole. It's a legislative hole. It's
00:30:46.580
not technically legal. It's not technically illegal. It's just there. It's floating in space. And
00:30:54.420
we're told that late-term abortions do not happen on an elective basis. It's just not a thing.
00:31:03.380
They're extremely rare. And they're for medically necessary purposes. And if that was the case,
00:31:10.340
where if a woman is going to die, I mean, of course, we should not have two people die.
00:31:16.660
But it's a terrible situation. But yeah, of course, I think most people would agree with that.
00:31:25.140
But that is not actually what is happening here. So this group, they put out their documentary,
00:31:31.940
and they went around to a number of abortion clinics, Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal, I think.
00:31:36.180
And it was a woman. She went in, over 20 weeks pregnant, says, I want an abortion. I'm like,
1.00
00:31:44.660
okay. Like, no problem. Casual. No, okay. She says, any restrictions? I'm like, no. I mean,
00:31:51.940
she's like, do I have to be at risk or anything? Or just like, I just want to end it. And she's
00:31:56.820
obviously got an undercover camera here. And they're just, like, blase. Like, this is just a
00:32:05.780
normal administrative thing. No, like, are you? They didn't even say, are you sure? Have you
00:32:11.300
thought about this? It's just, yeah, okay. Step right up. Don't be shy. When they've got some
00:32:18.180
damning numbers. Um, uh, so these late-term abortion, uh, abortions, uh, was it? See,
00:32:28.100
all of the, yeah, the KN Institute for Health Information says, uh, it's normally over a
00:32:33.380
thousand a year. Um, normally this, I think last year was down a bit, but it was normally well over
00:32:39.380
a thousand. There were a, not including Quebec, I guess Quebec's got different numbers. There were
00:32:44.020
123 live birth abortions, and that is where they attempt to kill the fetus inside the womb.
0.99
00:32:52.580
Um, and then they go to remove it. The child's removed, and it's still alive. And then they kill
00:32:59.060
it outside the womb, normally with a do not resuscitate. Uh, 28 of those were born alive and
00:33:06.180
viable in Alberta alone and allowed to die. I hate this topic, but like, uh, I watched this
00:33:13.700
thing. It's the ultimate third braille in Canadian politics. Uh, if you, you can't watch this and,
00:33:19.860
and, and, and read this and not think we've got to do something, Nigel.
00:33:24.820
Yes. Well, first of all, let's dispose of a couple of things. One is there is no credibility
00:33:32.180
issue here. When I first arrived in Alberta 25 years ago, the Alberta report, our distinguished
00:33:38.420
ancestor had just published a story about live births at, at the, uh, general hospital.
00:33:49.540
They had a nurse who spoke to them. They had names, they had everything. And this particular
00:33:54.580
nurse explained how, when babies were born alive after an abortion, they just put them on the slab
0.98
00:34:01.380
and let them die. And there was scandal and outrage. And in the end, they told the nurses,
00:34:07.700
just shut up and do your job. And that's, that, that was the government approach. Um,
00:34:15.060
but it happens when it, it really does happen. It's not as rare as we were told.
00:34:20.180
And it's been going on for 25 years that I can speak to, and I'm sure it was going on before that.
00:34:24.740
And then in our, in the Western standard, a few days ago, Richard Durr, who is, uh, you know,
00:34:32.580
he's a pro-life activist. He's definitely going to do it like Alberta. Yeah. Pro-life Alberta. Yeah.
00:34:36.900
I mean, this is not an entirely impartial source. Nevertheless, in a letter from Alberta's health
00:34:43.140
minister, Adriana Lagrange, he quotes this line, please know that there is no evidence of live birth
00:34:50.500
abortions in Alberta. I mean, that's just not true. We had, uh, 28. This is from the, if I'm not
00:34:59.540
mistaken, this is from the Canadian Institute of Health Information. Yes. So that's not some, uh,
00:35:03.780
right-wing pro-life Christian fanatic. Exactly. Um, and I, I don't know whether Ms. Lagrange wrote
00:35:11.380
that herself or whether that was prepared for a signature by, by somebody within the ministry. Um,
00:35:17.300
um, but it is not true. And that is the, one of the difficulties that we have with this whole issue
00:35:25.700
is knowing what to believe because the people who want abortion and like abortion and feel that it's
00:35:31.700
a right for women will certainly deny, deny, deny. Uh, in my earlier incarnation, while I was on the,
0.98
00:35:39.860
uh, on an editorial board, I visited an abortion clinic with other members of the editorial board.
00:35:47.220
We sat down with somebody who was performing abortions and I said, doesn't it bother you that
1.00
00:35:53.460
they, the, the thing that you are trying to abort is feeling pain? You wouldn't even do that to a puppy.
00:36:01.300
Oh, they don't feel pain. That is just not true. When you see images where the needle goes in,
00:36:10.500
the fetus, the baby is squirming and riddling and trying to get away from it. It is the most horrific
00:36:18.740
thing to say. Of course they feel bloody pain. What do these people believe? So it is incredibly hard
00:36:27.220
to have a sensible conversation about abortion because people will deny what is manifestly obvious. And
00:36:35.060
you have, I mean, I use CIHI statistics all the time when I'm talking about COVID. I have no reason to
00:36:43.460
believe that they are wrong when they say that there were a thousand hundreds to a thousand
00:36:52.340
live births. Yeah. That's not even just late term. That's live abortions where it, where a late term
1.00
00:36:57.060
abortion fails and the child is still born. So I, you know, this was something I didn't, I didn't get.
00:37:04.820
I had to, I had to ask the question, if you are attacking a baby inside a womb with the standard
0.75
00:37:14.020
vacuum cleaner apparatus that we read about, how does anything survive being sucked into a jet engine?
00:37:21.060
Well, the answer is that in certain circumstances, they don't use that technology.
00:37:26.340
They use the injection and then they hold the baby out with the forceps.
00:37:32.820
This is pretty graphic stuff. And I apologize for people who are put off for it. And by the way,
00:37:40.180
in this tragic situation, this is not an anti-woman rant on my part. So often the people who want the
00:37:48.740
abortion more than the woman is the man who's involved in the case. There's a lot of women who have abortions
1.00
00:37:54.660
who don't actually want them, but somebody else does. Anyway, leaving that aside and God bless the people
00:38:01.140
who do it, you know, who regret it. Here we have this, this frightful situation where the baby comes out
00:38:12.420
and they just leave it on the slide. Where is the humanity? I, I, I cannot.
00:38:18.900
Yeah. And people don't like discussing it. It's, it's a squeamish, a challenging area. And a lot of
00:38:26.020
people don't even realize it or know it. We are unregulated as Derek said. I think it's through
00:38:29.620
Morgenthaler in the past where that came about. We just have nothing there, which technically means
00:38:34.180
there's nothing to stop this. And we, you know, countries, most countries have some degree of
00:38:39.620
regulation. They draw a line usually around viability. Yeah. And kind of third trimester.
00:38:44.740
Yeah. And, and we're getting well beyond that when live babies are being delivered and this is
00:38:48.820
really problematic. And we got to quit making that excuse. Look, if you snip the umbilical cord,
00:38:52.900
even a premature one and put it into an incubator and then somebody came along and stabbed it,
00:38:56.740
they will be charged with murder. But if it turns out they're saying, well, I wanted an abortion. Well,
00:39:01.060
then we'll let that same child, same one, die. Now we're playing semantics with a murder is what
00:39:07.060
we're doing. And I know nobody likes to talk about it. I'm a libertarian. I, I do believe, you know,
00:39:12.100
that's a separate discussion on early term, uh, ability to do that. You've been pro-choice for a
00:39:18.900
very long time. I have. But even you think that there's got the alliance. The line has to be somewhere
00:39:22.900
in viability. We, we've got a lot of science to start in other countries we could look at with,
00:39:26.900
with where a line can be drawn. And right now when we have that void, but no politician wants to touch it
00:39:30.740
with a 10 foot pole. Also, because anyone who says there should be a line somewhere,
00:39:34.340
even an extremely generous to the pro-choice side line, they'll say, well, that's just the
00:39:41.060
split-degree slots of banning. You know, it's, it's become so fanatical. There was a great old
00:39:44.420
movie that really didn't do that great, I think, but, uh, it was called Citizen Ruth. If you might
00:39:48.980
remember it from the early nineties, it had Burt Reynolds and a few others, but it kind of showed the
00:39:52.740
insanity of both sides. It was a, a glue huffer who was found pregnant and pro-lifers have gotten old
00:39:58.500
ever. And it turned into a big fight between the crazed pro-life bunches and the crazed pro-choice
00:40:03.380
bunches. And it really did show both sides as being fanatically crazed on each end of it, kind of.
00:40:08.740
And I mean, it's serious business, but I mean, that it really, there's no room for nuance anymore.
00:40:15.540
Back when I was, you know, I'll give it a little personal. When I was 20, I had gotten a girl
00:40:19.460
pregnant. We went to, cause we weren't sure what we wanted to do. And we went down town. It used to be out
00:40:24.820
by the, the Cecil, actually the family planning clinic, but, uh, and by the way, that's my son.
00:40:29.940
We made our choice to keep, but when we chatted about it, we wanted to hear all options. We really
00:40:34.580
did. But that person, that counselor or whatever sat with us, there was only one option in her world.
00:40:39.540
Abort, abort, abort, abort. That's all she was doing was convincing. You guys are too young. You
00:40:44.100
aren't in a condition to deal with this. You really must. And we can set you up and giving it, well, again,
00:40:48.900
what were the other options? What about adoption? What about, you know, supports if we want to raise it
00:40:53.460
ourselves, all of that. We didn't get any of that. That's just one example, but that really did sour
00:40:58.740
me on the advocates for this. We really did want to come in there and hear about all the options on
00:41:03.460
the table. We've got advocates who were married to one end or another. And those advocates are, again,
00:41:11.940
they want no regulation under any circumstance. Uh, I don't want to see it as advocates on someone who
00:41:16.740
want to see it, you know, illegalized from the point of conception. Uh, I would like to see a line
00:41:22.820
drawn somewhere. And I think viability is kind of where we can start. Yeah. Well, yeah.
00:41:29.540
You know, the other thing, Derek, we want to see a few lines drawn around
00:41:33.060
life at the other end, too. Medical assistance and dying.
00:41:42.340
Um, I mean, where you draw the line, I mean, there's only one really clear line and that would
00:41:48.020
be the hard pro-life side, which is conception. Okay. I'm not prepared to draw it there. Um,
00:41:54.980
even if you think that is like, and you know, but I actually do think that's probably where life
00:42:02.980
Yeah. I mean, that is probably where life is, but I mean, it's probably,
00:42:05.860
it's just not a practical place to draw it. Um, somewhere, you know, towards the end of the
00:42:12.820
first trimester is probably a reasonable place. If it's going to be after that, it's got to be where
00:42:16.660
it's absolutely medically necessary. The woman's life is at risk, that kind of thing. But we just
00:42:23.460
are so fixated ideologically in this country. I mean, look at Europe, these crazy dumb ass
00:42:32.420
liberal Europeans, every single one of them, every single European country has some line somewhere.
00:42:39.060
And, you know, and there's a spectrum about where they are.
00:42:42.180
Ireland, I think, had it too strict at one point and a woman died as a result.
00:42:45.620
That was too far in one way. Um, but very, very liberal countries, France, Germany,
00:42:52.500
Britain, uh, Spain, like all, all these, you know, run by lefty countries, they all don't allow this.
00:43:00.340
This is, this is not cool. Um, and I get the conservatives are terrified. They don't want to
00:43:06.420
touch it. And there are things that actually could be done provincially in the provincial
00:43:09.460
government's response. When I was a provincial politician to federal jurisdiction. Well, yes,
00:43:13.700
on the criminal code it is, the administration of healthcare is provincial. And you could decide
00:43:18.500
not to allow this in, in these most extreme cases, because they are not exceedingly rare.
00:43:24.580
They're not the majority of abortion cases, but they're not rare. And they are brutally violent.
00:43:30.260
I said, you wouldn't do it to a puppy. I wouldn't do it to a gopher. So at least what I do to a gopher is a lot more.
00:43:42.660
Jesus, you do it from a distance with a 22. I mean, here's the reality too. And that's quick. I'm glad
00:43:47.860
that they're bringing it to public attention. And hopefully maybe at least it has some impact on some
00:43:53.380
of the women, young women are making decisions and planning and then maybe see the horrors of
1.00
00:43:58.260
what waiting too long might turn into a doctorate. This is ghoulish. That too. This is ghoulish.
00:44:03.300
We also know politically, we've been at it so long, the chances of any politician initiate,
00:44:06.980
they're not going to, no, no one's going to touch this. So all you can do is public information and hope
00:44:11.060
for the best right now. Anyways, unless something dramatically changes. Yeah. Okay. I hated that,
00:44:17.860
but you know what? Uh, so anyway, hats off, probably for Alberta, Richard, uh, and, uh,
00:44:24.420
the right now group. Uh, I I'm not with them on a hundred percent of where they go with these things,
00:44:28.500
but I, I think they've done a real public service bringing this forward in a very
00:44:33.140
tasteful way. This wasn't a bunch of graphic images designed to turn so much stomach. I think
00:44:36.740
they, they made a logical argument actually, and they did journalism here, going out, getting
00:44:41.620
information, video, proving their case. So hats off to them. That was, that was good work.
00:44:46.340
Yeah. The front page of the national post of the weekend. Yeah. Yeah. Thanks. Good one.
00:44:50.660
Okay. Uh, do I have enough time for mine, but you two get a parting shot. We'll, uh, start with
00:44:57.060
Nigel. Well, yeah, I had something else in mind, but you know, what I would say is that if they did
00:45:02.420
outside the womb to a child, what they do inside the womb to an unborn baby, we wouldn't be having
1.00
00:45:07.940
this discussion. It wouldn't be allowed. Yeah. Well, and you know, we don't even, uh, we're not even
00:45:12.020
willing to, when a, when a person murders an obviously pregnant woman, uh, we don't give them
00:45:19.220
two counts of murder in Canada, even though that's very often the intent is it's kind of abortion by
00:45:25.300
execution of the mother. It's a man who doesn't want the child that happens. And we, they still
00:45:30.820
only get one count of murder. Uh, God, we're messed up. Corey, take us through another topic.
00:45:38.500
I'll just go through it. It's healthcare, but not nearly as, as, as rough, but, uh, I, I like that,
00:45:42.580
uh, Premier Smith has released bill 11. I just love the irony that I remember bill 11 when Ralph
00:45:46.740
Klein did it. Yeah. We're looking at healthcare reform and he backed off and he said that was
00:45:50.260
one of his great regrets. Uh, I hope Premier Smith does not because we need healthcare reform
00:45:54.820
terribly. Uh, please, Ms. Smith, stand your ground on this one. Let's get that, uh, private public,
00:46:00.900
uh, ability out there because our system's failing and people can't deny it anymore.
00:46:05.780
All right. Gentlemen, Nigel, Corey, John around the studio. Thank you very much.
00:46:12.900
Thank all of you for joining us today on the pipeline. Remember, if you're not a member,
00:46:17.140
you're freeloading, you cheap bastard. Go to westernsnetter.news right now, click on subscribe,
0.86
00:46:22.260
$10 a month or a hundred dollars a year for unlimited access to all Western standard content
00:46:26.580
and get past the paywall blocking you from getting the very best news in the West. Oh,
00:46:32.020
yeah. And one last thing, uh, the United Conservative Party's AGM is this weekend.
00:46:37.700
The Western standard crew is headed north, uh, to cover it all weekend in Edmonton. We are going
00:46:44.820
to be throwing a very large, very loud and boisterous hospitality suite. The Western standard rager,
00:46:52.260
we're calling it, um, free drinks, free food. It's going to be a lot of fun to be right at the
00:46:57.540
convention grounds. So if you're, uh, an Alberta unit conservative party member or visiting from
00:47:02.420
out of province and you go into the convention, uh, come on by and have a drink on us. Thank you