The usual suspects are back to discuss a variety of news items. Federal Environment Minister Stephen Gilbo says no more roads should be built in Alberta, cities should encourage people to walk more, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says Canadians do not want Canada to be great again.
00:01:38.040Well, we've got really interesting topics today, good headlines.
00:01:42.700Federal Environment Minister Stephen Gilbo says, no more roads.
00:01:47.000Cities should stop building roads to encourage people to walk more.
00:01:50.880Get out of your car and walk from Calgary to Edmonton, because that's good for the environment.
00:01:56.760You didn't say that exactly, but more or less saying that the federal government should stop using the gas tax fund to transfer money to municipalities for roads.
00:02:07.180And instead, just use it on bike paths and sidewalks, that kind of thing.
00:02:11.800The Auditor General's report into the arrived scam app is out. How could the budget balloon from about $80,000 to what it turned out to be? $57 million approximately?
00:02:27.800approximately. 59 and change I think the last count. Yeah that's a that's a little over budget.
00:02:33.640How did costs given to this liberal aligned firm manage to explode by, I can't even do the math in
00:02:43.160my head, how many times is that? The leader of the opposition said it was 750%. I checked his
00:02:50.040math, it was actually 746. I think that's more than that. 80,000 to 59.5. We're gonna have to
00:02:59.800do the math on that because it's just so many times over I'm having a hard time. Have the operations
00:03:04.280manager check it out. Yeah. Justin Trudeau says that Pierre Polyev wants to make Canada great
00:03:11.080again and Canadians do not want Canada to be great again. A very interesting and bizarre exchange in
00:03:17.800in the House of Commons. I mean, it's one thing
00:04:10.860They provide you resources to make sure you can protect your right ability to use those firearms.
00:04:14.880And they, like any other association, provide all sorts of resources as well, whether it's for local shows or events and things such as that.
00:04:21.640So check them out, Canadian Shooting Sports Association.
00:04:24.320Their website is cssa-cila.org, or you can just Google them, Canadian Shooting Sports Association.
00:04:31.780It's a membership well worth investing in for yourself.
00:04:34.860You know, Corey, you probably saw this in our pages just within the last two weeks.
00:04:38.660We had an article there from Tony updating our readers on what was going on in the government with regard to firearms.
00:11:26.400All right. Well, a little less crazy, but a little more traditional liberal corruption era.
00:11:35.000I mean, it's rarely a week goes by without some form of liberal corruption coming up, but the Arrive can, dubbed Arrive Scam now.
00:11:45.680This is, this has got the sniff of the sponsorship scandal on it.
00:11:50.760This one, this one smells like pure old fashioned liberal corruption. So the arrive can app was originally contracted by the federal government to them. What's called GC strategies, GC strategies. Now, fun little fact. If you're following along at home, look up their Twitter account and look at who GC strategies follows. They follow only one person.
00:12:19.000Justin Trudeau. They have one person they follow, Justin Trudeau. Now, if I was setting up
00:12:25.000a corruption scheme, and I was going to create a Twitter account to try and give the appearance
00:12:30.140of being a legitimate business, I don't know, I'd probably follow at least three people.
00:12:35.820Three people, maybe. But not just the one guy who butters my bread. So I did the math quickly.
00:12:43.100We were talking about in the opening here about how over budget this is. It's not 738% over budget. It's 737 times over budget.
00:19:39.400liberal. They didn't really care which faction of liberal within the liberal universe, they're like, well, those are different liberals. Canadians are, yeah, but they're liberals. Is the victim card here available for them to play? Or if they play that card, though, you know,
00:19:56.400You can only do it if you're not tied to it.
00:19:59.340I mean, even then, as you said, it's under their watch.
00:20:02.320They're still going to wear some of this no matter what.
00:20:05.280But to date, there's been no evidence tying it to any liberals.
00:20:08.020It looks like, you know, some senior bureaucrats and CBSA.
00:20:10.300And then again, the buck stops in the prime minister's office.
00:20:14.020But yeah, their quiet lack of indignation on this, I guess, may spell it.
00:20:21.200Or maybe at least they're scrambling just to make sure they don't have a connection somewhere before they take the offensive.
00:20:26.020because this stinks. This stinks bad. So Nigel, we have the Auditor General's report. Where do
00:20:32.720things go from here? You will recall that... No one's been held accountable. No, you will recall
00:20:40.160that the Auditor General was asked specifically about corruption, and she deflected the question
00:20:46.840by saying that certain things have been referred to the RCMP. That is where it has gone. So we will
00:20:54.700see you will see fairly soon i should expect that if anybody gets charged uh and they may well be
00:21:02.860the the scapegoats in them in the issue but i come back to my original point once you create an
00:21:09.180atmosphere of panic you can get away with anything and that's the serious lesson that this this
00:21:14.460incident much more than the money the money's bad but if you want to put something across canadians
00:21:20.620you just scare them and you make them afraid. And then you do whatever you want.
00:21:24.620And something may illegal may have happened. But the thing is, you know, with these kinds
00:21:28.940of arrangements, it might be illegal in any other circumstance, except when the government does it.
00:21:36.780Like, you know, for example, it's illegal. I remember so when I was finance critic of the
00:21:41.820Wildrose, the provincial NDP broke the law by busting through their artificial debt ceiling.
00:21:49.020And the question was, well, what happens when they break the law? The answer was nothing. It's a law, but there is no punishment to it. And so I'm not sure, perhaps something, you know, maybe something illegal happened here.
00:22:05.080But when the government does it, it's just almost de facto legal unless someone circumvents very specific areas in criminal law.
00:22:14.540So I'm not sure anyone gets held, has held the responsibility here.
00:22:19.200We'll see. Yeah, I mean, there's certainly a case to be made if there's fraud that has been committed.
00:22:23.540And on the surface, it looks like there's some evidence of it.
00:22:26.800But it's a matter, again, of whether there's going to be the government will to go after and scapegoat who's responsible or if they just want to try and make this go away.
00:22:34.640And if they go after them, the worry is then, well, then they're going to have to defend themselves.
00:22:39.440And if they're going to defend themselves, they're going to speak about what the government said to them.
00:24:42.980It must be a country of hope and an example to the world
00:24:46.660And only when it is these things, when Canada is all that it can be
00:24:51.780Only then can we say that our work is done
00:24:54.920So long before anybody thought of Donald Trump as president of the United States, former Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Canada is great and will be great, etc.
00:25:04.260So using the word great and Trudeau says, well, this is clear that Pierre Polyev, who was a junior minister at the time, was aware that Donald Trump would be U.S. president and campaign on a slogan of making America great again.
00:28:26.920You know, you go back to the Second World War, and you see what a little nation of 10 million people was able to do in the fight against fascism.
00:28:39.580But even then, that was two nations in one state. Quebec is its own nation.
00:28:44.100Well, they would certainly tell you that, but the simple fact is in the name of Canada, with Canada on the shoulder patches, 900,000 people out of a population of 10 million put on uniform and came out of the end of the war as one of the significant military.
00:29:01.100And they were mostly Anglos. Quebecers, by a large measure, either opposed the war or did not participate until conscription.
00:29:08.200When I am in my cups, I do like to say that. But the truth of the matter is that the French-Canadian contribution to that war was significant.
00:29:18.260It was, but it was in significantly lower numbers than an Anglo-Canada.
00:29:20.800There were significantly less of them to offer their services.
00:29:58.160Demographic mix, changed the anthem, you know, these kinds of things.
00:30:02.760But in all of those cases, people would still argue, I think, that it was in order to reconstruct a nation, not necessarily to change it.
00:30:12.940There's only in the last few years that you've really seen the whole idea of the nation of Canada held as a secondary consideration and treated with contempt.
00:30:24.980Corey, I know you and I have maybe different conceptions of Canadian nationhood than Nigel does, but I suppose we've maybe got a little off track.
00:30:35.720I think we're kind of, well, yeah, we're a little off track. But to what Trudeau said here, that
00:30:41.800Canadians do not want Canada to be great again. Was this him just kind of getting away with his
00:30:48.080own rhetoric against Mega? Or was this? We might be reading a bit too much into a simple man.
00:30:54.300I mean, he's not good when he goes off script. And he's been told, and we can see that from
00:31:01.160the government lately, they've been failing when they try to go after Polyev. So the instructions
00:31:05.400have been, whenever you can, go after Trump, campaign against Trump, campaign against Premier
00:31:11.260Smith, campaign against others, they feel that there's a weaker spot to go against there.
00:31:15.860And the point I think he was just trying to make was a sidelong, unscripted way to try and tie
00:31:21.460things to Donald Trump. But he tripped on his own tongue. And of course, it came out sounding
00:31:27.360horrific when you're saying Canadians don't want to be great. And, you know, I believe it's I mean,
00:31:34.260I agree he's got this warped vision of a post-national state and things like that. But
00:31:39.400I think in this particular statement, maybe there was a bit of a Freudian underpinning to that. But
00:31:45.200for the most part, I think he just slipped up. But it's a terrible slip up to make when you're
00:31:49.940talking about national unity. I think you made an interesting point there about how he wants
00:31:54.340to campaign against others because Polyev has turned out to be a hard target to land a punch0.99
00:31:58.700against. And it's not uncommon that liberals will campaign against the U.S. president if that
00:32:04.300president is Republican. Republicans are the more nationalistic party in the United States, so
00:32:08.640obviously if you're not a national of the United States, you're going to feel less attraction to
00:32:14.340American nationalism. You know, Paul Martin would regularly campaign against George Bush, even
00:32:20.800though George Bush was not running for Canadian prime minister, he would campaign against Bush.
00:32:24.100That was fairly common. So I would I would certainly expect him to campaign against Trump.
00:32:29.860So let's talk about maybe how a Trump presidency, second Trump presidency or restoration, Trump restoration, let's call it, could affect the next election.
00:32:39.380It's not for sure. But if I'm putting money down, I think Trump is going to be president again.
00:32:44.280Biden was the boring, safe candidate in the last election.
00:32:48.420maybe a collectocrat establishment democrat but he wasn't seen as crazy but now he is undeniably
00:32:57.300heavily senile he cannot operate as commander in chief in the united states he just simply
00:33:04.660can't do the job regardless of what you think of his politics uh some people think trump's crazy
00:33:10.500And maybe he is, but he is not senile. And Biden doesn't know what room he's in. You know, if you have like a major car accident or something, they'll ask you three questions like, what year is it? What's your name? And who's president United States? And I'm not sure that Joe Biden can answer any three of those questions at the same time on any given day. So I think there's a very good chance we're going to have another Trump presidency.
00:33:37.060Yeah. But something different this time is that Trump's not the unknown boogeyman. He might not have appealed to a lot of Canadians. We also know during the four years he was in power, he didn't do much to harm Canada. I mean, what are you defending us against? I mean, perhaps, you know, people may feel he'd do some damage in the American area, but he's no more protectionist than Biden was or is. And, you know, he's not an expansionist president. He's not going to send the army after us or something.
00:34:02.660So I don't think those shots of trying to say we're going to protect you from Trump are really going to land that as well as they think they might.
00:34:10.240Not that. But I think the accusation is that Polyev would govern like Trump.
00:34:16.440And I think they're there. And the biggest knock against Trump is his own personality.
00:34:21.280A lot of people like myself like Trumpism, but we don't I don't like Trump, the man, the individual.
00:34:27.320So it was really the individual character and I don't think Polly if there's anything like him as an individual character.
00:34:33.320But I think it's the accusation isn't that you'd be supporting Trump Trump is going to hurt Canada.
00:34:39.320I think the accusation is that you'll govern Canada like Trump governs America.
00:34:43.320How much do you think a Trump restoration for lack of better term will hurt the chances of Polly have in the next election?1.00
00:35:23.680I can see them trying but I can't see them I can't see it working as I think it's probability it's not guaranteed but I think probability wise it's a pretty good bet to bet on Trump coming back to the presidency in the United States it's looking that way yeah I can't for the life of me figure out why the Democrats can't say let's get someone else who's not entirely off the rocker
00:35:53.580senile to be their candidate for president, but this seems to be what they've decided. They're
00:35:59.600putting great grandpa up again, not letting him retire. To be fair, I can't see why the Republicans
00:36:04.960can't find somebody sane either. Well, the difference is the Republicans like Trump. The
00:36:09.200Democrats don't even really like Biden. He's just their guy. No Democrat is a thwalled about him.
00:36:16.200The radical left of the Democrats don't like him because he's an establishment
00:36:19.760I think it's just the Democratic establishment is afraid that the radical woke and socialist left of the Democrats will have their chance for a candidate this time if they put up someone who's not as old as Bernie Sanders.
00:36:33.760But in any case, I think Trump is a pretty good bet.
00:36:36.760that yes but it's but that's actually kind of dangerous because what happens when you've got
00:36:42.360a candidate who is destined to lose is that you find a distraction and you have a national
00:36:49.000emergency and you say well this guy is monica missiles something like that well no american
00:36:56.280president's ever lost while at war i mean it's it's a good incentive for having wars and donald
00:37:01.960Trump is the first president since Herbert Hoover to not have a significant war during his presidency.
00:37:08.520I mean, Trump would have stood a very good chance of getting reelected if he had have had a war,
00:37:13.240or if he would have leaned into COVID using wartime language the way other world leaders did.
00:37:17.320Which war are you associating with Hoover?
00:37:19.880I said he's the last president who didn't get America into a significant war.
00:37:22.920Oh, I see. Yes. Too busy getting them into a depression.
00:37:26.760No, generally speaking, if you want to get into a war, elect a Democrat.
00:37:31.500You've got Woodrow Wilson in the First World War.
00:37:55.660And without Watergate, probably would have gone about a much better. But certainly through through Reagan. I mean, I love Reagan as much as the next guy. But Reagan was a hawk. Bush first, Bush the second. They were both hawks.
00:38:08.000It's the old thing. If you don't want if you want peace, prepare for war. And that's what the Republicans have done. That's what the Democrats.
00:38:15.120But Trump returned the Republicans to their traditional position as the peace party.
00:38:21.640But for a long time, I'd say from Reagan on through the second Bush, they were the war party.0.53
00:38:28.840But it switched back to the way it was pre-Reagan.
00:38:32.320I mean, just to head off the guys who are already reaching for their phones, I will concede that George Bush took the United States into the war in Afghanistan and the war against terror.
00:38:42.520On the other hand, what else was he going to do after the trade center?
00:38:47.080We're way off track, but I'm liking this off track today.
00:38:49.400Afghanistan, I totally had to do, but Iraq was a pretty, that was an optional.0.99
00:38:54.480That was not a mandatory question on the...
00:38:57.140It did backfire on them once things were investigated and realized.
00:39:00.740And I think the result of that is one thing that propelled the return of the Republicans,
00:39:04.760the position of the, not anti-war party, but the less imperialist of the two parties.
00:39:10.380Okay, well, we're going off a lot of tangents today, but I'm liking these tangents. But let's bring it back closer to home again here. So Pierre Polyev, when he ran for Conservative leader, promised to defund the CBC. Very popular. He's been very clear on that.
00:39:30.900He gives these great speeches about, you know, he looks forward to the day when they can close down the headquarters of the CBC in Toronto,
00:39:39.780when a family pulls up a U-Haul and moves into the C-suite.
00:39:44.800But he has, until now, not committed to ending the government subsidies to the so-called private sector media,
00:39:54.640the bailouts, essentially, that the Western Standard painfully has not taken.
00:40:00.900Which is why you need to support us by becoming a member at westernstandard.news.
00:40:07.100But he has not yet committed until now to end the private sector subsidies.
00:40:12.960And I've suspected it's because, well, it's pretty hard for a journalist to cover you fairly if you're promising to end subsidies that are paying for their jobs.
00:40:25.760I mean, if I'm a reporter and 35%, 40% plus of my salary is directly dependent on keeping the liberals in power, I can't cover the other guys fairly.
00:40:42.320And so I think he's been afraid of provoking the media against him by saying he'd get rid of these subsidies.
00:40:49.840I suspect, Corey, that the reason he has just this week promised to do away with the subsidies to Toronto Star, National Post, Golden Mail, all these guys, is because he's finally realized that they're not going to give him a fair shake no matter what.
00:41:12.700So he may as well promise to ax their jobs.
00:41:15.440Yeah, I mean, I think there's two reasons.
00:41:18.060They're not going to give them a fair shake. They're on them like fleas on a dog. I've never
00:41:22.800seen media so eager to keep the leader of the opposition accountable as I have in this last
00:41:27.580year while giving a pass to the prime minister who prances out of the country or out of the
00:41:32.560House of Commons every time a scandal comes up. The other part too, though, is I think it's
00:41:36.600becoming evident to Canadians in general that the subsidies aren't working. The newspapers are
00:41:41.460still contracting. The CTV and Bell are still doing layoffs. The subsidies aren't working.
00:41:46.920They're trying to save outlets, you know, and I've got a column coming out in a little while on that from an inevitable despise, despise, I despise some of them.
00:41:58.520And he's realizing that, you know, Canadians are also realizing this is just throwing good money after bad.
00:42:04.180Something needs to change, but subsidizing isn't working.
00:42:08.500Nigel, why do you think he's declined until now to say he would get rid of the subsidies to the so-called private sector media, and has just now said he'll do it?
00:42:22.020Well, timing is everything, and one thing is you don't want to put all your policies out there at the moment, but it just seemed like the right time to point out that the media,
00:42:32.420Bell has just laid off, what was it, 5,000 people to get rid of a massive operating debt
00:42:42.180that was piling up to what was basically a telephone company.
00:43:33.900He'll take as many questions as he likes.
00:43:35.840But, boy, if you were a reporter, you had better have your questions in order
00:43:40.480and be based on solid fact or he will make a fool of you.
00:43:44.000And I don't know why, but they keep coming up unprepared,
00:43:47.720and he eats his apple or he mocks the toque or whatever it is, you know,
00:43:52.880and they go off with their tails between their legs.
00:43:55.380And now he has finally given them the kick in the rear as they leave.
00:43:59.560By the way, I'm dropping this and you'll get a, you know, getting a job, make toast for old people or something.1.00
00:44:07.480Yeah, that's that's the end game here to actually diminish their their influence and the respect that people have for the media by just showing them up working.
00:44:19.280You know, I've had meetings with politicians and, you know, not infrequently.
00:44:25.640When I was testifying at the Senate last year on Bill C-18, the Online News Act, I was, I think by a liberal or technically an independent, but a liberal senator, what can the government do to help the independent media like the Western Standard?
00:44:43.860And what I said was, leave us alone, and stop subsidizing our competitors. Stop subsidizing the legacy media, and stop trying to help us. Just leave us alone. And that's it. So if Pierre Polyev can end these subsidies.
00:45:00.720more national advertising might have been. Well, yeah, I suppose so. Don't you think?
00:45:06.960You know what, that's a good idea. But, you know, stop subsidizing our competitors, and stop trying
00:45:13.360to pass things like the Online News Act to help us because all the Online News Act did was get us
00:45:16.960kicked off Facebook. It costed us a lot of money. So what do you think it costs the mainstream media
00:45:23.360because they were Facebook was paperboy for them to? Yeah, but not not in the same percentages. It
00:45:28.000It was, because conservatives are more likely to be on Facebook, leftists are more likely to be on Twitter.
00:45:33.760Twitter is still there, Facebook is not for us.
00:45:36.920So it hurt everybody, but it proportionally hurt more conservative and right-leaning publications more.