00:00:44.660A new cabinet for Alberta will be unveiled and sworn in.
00:00:49.560We've got lots of speculation about who's in, who's out, and what that cabinet's going
00:00:53.640to look like and what it's really going to be charged with doing.
00:00:56.340We're going to talk about a memo obtained by Black Locks reporter and published in the Western Standard from the federal government, the Privy Council office, which is essentially more or less the wing of the prime minister's office in Ottawa.
00:01:11.280Kind of laying out some pretty stark language, the federal government's so-called communication strategy around adverse effects for vaccines.
00:01:20.360Obviously, all vaccines have adverse effects, and the COVID vaccine was no exception, but the communications, or spin, if you will, or propaganda, if you're being less charitable around this, is quite jarring, and we've got the memo itself.
00:01:40.000David Johnson continues his march from esteemed Canadian noble statesman to Liberal Party puppet.
00:01:50.500It's been absolutely jarring to see the very unexpected fall from grace of David Johnson and his previously impeccable reputation
00:02:00.400into the point where he's essentially the dancing monkey in Justin Trudeau's Chinese interference parade.
00:02:07.840And if we have time, we're going to talk about a revelation first reported in the Western Standard coming from Alberta Conservative MP Michelle Rempel-Garner, who has obtained evidence that there were more sexual assaults in the COVID hostage hotels established by the federal government.
00:02:28.840Before we get into all that, though, I want to thank my favorite sponsor, the Canadian Shooting Sports Association. I've been a member of the CSSA for more than a decade because I trust them as Canada's leading firearms rights organization in Canada.
00:02:40.980If you're a gun owner in Canada, your rights under constant attack by the federal government and other subnational governments across Canada, they want to take your guns away, and they're not stopping at the scary looking ones.
00:02:58.320They're just taking one bite of the pie at a time.
00:03:02.220If you're a gun owner, though, you need to stand together with other gun owners in Canada and join the Canadian Shooting Sports Association.
00:03:08.100Go to CSSA-CILA.org or do what I do and Google them and become a member today.
00:03:18.200Danielle Smith is still the premier, and she gets to swear in her second cabinet.
00:03:24.600Her first cabinet, she inherited largely from Jason Kenney.
00:03:29.420She made some changes, removed a few, most notably Jason Nixon, who was Kenney's right-hand man
00:03:37.260and who had inserted himself into the leadership race in a way that most people found was grossly
00:03:42.480inappropriate. So he was out. And he was very unpopular with people who opposed mandates and
00:03:47.100things like that, because he just seems too close to Kenny. Rick McIver, a longtime PC minister under
00:03:54.280Alison Redford and Jim Prentice. And then again, under Jason Kenney, he was removed, although that
00:04:02.000was a bit more surprising. And he was the interim leader of the PCs after they lost the 2015 election.
00:04:07.260There were a number of changes. She brought in some, but it was overall, more or less, still kind of Jason Kenney's cabinet. Didn't want to rock the boat too, too much.
00:04:15.960Oh, and brought in Todd Lowen, who not only just came into the cabinet, but came into the caucus itself after being exiled by Jason Kenney.
00:04:24.320I don't want to get into the specifics yet. We're going to talk about individual ministers you expect to be in or not to be in.
00:04:31.220But we'll start with you, Corey, on what you generally are expecting from Smith's first new cabinet now. Are you expecting more or less a continuation of the previous cabinet or something entirely new?
00:04:46.160It's a tough question. I mean, whether she's going to want to make her mark now and break away now that she has a mandate or carry on.
00:04:53.660And I, you know, because she's got a limited caucus now compared to what she'd had before, she doesn't quite have the leeway to really shuffle too, too much from before.0.77
00:05:02.440I mean, we've got some inexperienced caucus members.
00:05:05.140I think there's going to be some eye raisers in there, though.
00:05:07.440I mean, her relationships with different MLAs that are in there, we're only just seeing development.
00:05:11.900Because I do believe she's going to want to make this hers.
00:05:14.160As you said, she's been kind of carrying the remnants of Jason Kenney's cabinet for a while.
00:05:18.260she's going to want some distinctions in there that are definitely her own that she didn't have,
00:05:22.880I think, going into this election. Nigel, how big a change? Of course, some changes necessitated.
00:05:29.080There are MLAs there who weren't there before, and there are some ministers who were in cabinet
00:05:33.780before but aren't there now. Kenny's cabinet was particularly urban and in particular Calgary
00:05:42.880urban heavy and that's where nearly all of the losses for the UCP and the electric came from
00:05:49.140was in Calgary so by necessity some of these people are just not going to be in cabinet
00:05:52.720but how big a change are you expecting this cabinet to be over her previous cabinet
00:05:57.400which was you know in large measure but not entirely still had a significant number of
00:06:04.480holdovers from Kenny. Well I'll tell you what I'm expecting and I'll tell you what I'm hoping
00:06:09.200My expectation is, as you said, so many of the last group, the last cadre have lost the election or retired from the game of politics.
00:06:21.100But out of the 24 cabinet positions that she announced in October, eight of those are gone.
00:06:27.800So she has a choice to make a smaller cabinet, but it's not going to be an order of magnitude smaller that it would only have, you know, 20.
00:06:35.980Some of those ministries just don't mesh well together.
00:06:40.480So she's going to have to come up with 20, 21, 22 names, I'm sure.
00:06:44.860And my expectation is that she will look favorably on the people who supported her during the run-up.
00:10:57.140So it's not that she has to fill all of these gaps if she creates less gaps here.
00:11:00.720But let's get your guys' bets on who's in, who's out,
00:11:05.580out of the out of the lineup there between the new MLAs and reelected MLAs who are not currently in the cabinet that went into this election. So with you, Nigel, who do you think is in? Who do you think is out?
00:11:18.580Quoting from my column that I published an hour ago.
00:13:16.400And I think Gene has got the, I think he's got the intestinal fortitude to actually take that on and wouldn't need to be, wouldn't need to be handheld through the whole process.
00:13:25.980The other one possible one for him, I'd say, would be health, because he's always talked more than a normal conservative would about health care.
00:13:34.720That was one of the reasons he re-entered provincial politics after the death of his son, and he was upset with the health care system.
00:13:39.540That being said, if you want to make sure someone is not able to ever challenge you for the leadership of your party, you make them health minister, because no health minister ever does well, because health is a disaster in Canada, and it always will be a disaster in Canada.
00:13:54.600So you want to kill someone on your side, you put them in health.
00:16:38.700I mean, Asani might go into an associate minister position or something like that, but I think Schultz, she's got a lot of gumption, and I know Nigel's column.
00:16:47.120Schultz is, I think, going to get a pretty secret post.
00:16:49.100I think she, is she one of the other lawyers, one of the three lawyers?
00:18:24.200Nigel, I think Jason Nixon is one of the big question marks over this.
00:18:28.100I think he's generally considered competent for cabinet.
00:18:30.880But, you know, managed to make a lot of internal enemies over the years. He's a very elbows-up political player and seen as the enforcer. He was a tied domi of Jason Kenney and very much tied to kind of the, particularly the, even though he wasn't health minister, he was an instrumental guy during the Kenney government and kind of got the stink of mandates or lockdowns on him, even though it was not his ministry.
00:18:56.940Sorry. He'd be a controversial move, I think, to bring back. But he is competent. Do you think
00:19:05.280we're going to see him back in? No, but I will give you the thinking that would make it possible
00:19:11.660for you to get past those old animosities. There is an expression that you keep your friends close
00:19:17.300and your enemies closer. All right, he has not been an enthusiastic supporter of Daniel Smith.
00:20:51.160Minister of Ottawa. Now we're talking. Yeah. I don't know if you come up with a sexier name for it.
00:20:56.920It's the Alberta Sovereignty Ministry or whatever it is.
00:21:00.880But, you know, Smith, normally it goes, it's called Intergovernmental Affairs.
00:21:06.220And it goes to someone and it's a consolation prize. It's a hyper junior post.
00:21:11.520Or it gets carried by the premier and it's like a, you know, kind of uses a symbolic thing that I'm going to fight Ottawa.
00:21:17.000Do you think we see this be broken out as its own ministry again and beefed up into a more prominent senior position, or do you think it gets kind of carried along as a little attendum?
00:21:32.460The symbolism of Daniel Smith taking that particular post would be significant.
00:21:37.760Well, Kenny did it, though, and it didn't really say much after the initial announcement.
00:21:41.100Well, that's because it was Jason Kenny who made the decisions that he made.
00:21:46.140But I'm not sure it actually says that much, because there's two ways you can look at it fairly.
00:21:51.660One is, it's so important that the Premier carries it.
00:21:54.480The other is, it's so unimportant that the Premier can also carry it,
00:21:58.620and didn't actually assign anyone to focus on it as their full-time job.
00:22:03.280And I think both of those are probably fair ways to look at it, Corey.
00:22:05.920Well, if we were looking at it, I'm sorry, Corey, go ahead.
00:22:08.820I was just going to say, if we were making the argument in New Brunswick, yeah, maybe you could say that.
00:22:12.280But Alberta and Ottawa, the lines are already drawn.
00:22:15.700So we know it's not an insignificant thing.
00:22:18.300I know that, but Kenny took it and it was, you know, he would issue some terse news releases and huff and puff at a podium once in a while, but there was no one focused on it full time.
00:22:30.180So I'll kind of just rephrase the question for you, Corey.
00:22:32.960Does it say more about its importance if the Premier takes it personally, or does it say more if the Premier says, I'm putting someone in charge of this and it's their job full time to, you know, man the ramparts against Ottawa?
00:22:48.080I still think it's more important if the Premier takes it themselves and they can go head to head. I mean, not just the optics of I'm going to take on Trudeau and whoever that might be, and it'll look better for the Premier down the road, too.
00:23:01.340I mean, that always pulls well with those types of battles.
00:23:03.480If she does something, the problem was Kenny took it and didn't do anything with it.
00:23:07.860You know, he postured, he talked, and I think Premier Smith sounds like she's ready to go to battle.
00:23:12.480And it gives her an out to reduce the cabinet a little as well when there's no sense bloating it more when we've already got an issue of a large cabinet.
00:23:19.000I just really don't think the premier taking a ministry says it's more important because, you know, a government that's hyper focused on finance, the premier doesn't also take the finance role.
00:23:28.420They understand you still need someone who's focused on it full time.
00:23:30.900the premier is the the premier still will talk about finance taxes spending if you're committed
00:23:36.980to health you know smith did a lot on health or at least focused a lot on health uh between her
00:23:41.780election as ucp leader and election generally she didn't take the health ministry she talked about
00:23:46.580it a ton so i don't know being in her governmental affairs i don't think uh means she talks more or
00:23:51.540less about it i think it actually says more if it's a standalone so someone's it's someone's
00:23:55.620job to focus on it all day every day and she could talk about it as much or as little she likes one
00:24:00.420way or another. Potentially, but I mean, again, it's just almost a duplication. I mean, if there's
00:24:06.180one minister there, they might steal her thunder a little if it comes to battles with Ottawa. I mean,
00:24:09.460she doesn't have to make an announcement that I'm taking this ministry. It's just a matter of
00:24:12.980I'm not recreating it. I think it should be called the State Department. Next to the defense.
00:24:20.660I won't get too into it because we're going to waste all our time, but I think we should just
00:24:24.340totally reorganize cabinet. We should have a ministry of the interior, and you can consolidate
00:24:29.780a ton of current bullshit ministries into the ministry of the interior. And then you have a0.93
00:24:35.540state department, everything that's looking out. You know, I, yeah, you may be right, Derek. One
00:24:40.840thing is for sure, we're looking at a very special time in Alberta's relationships with Ottawa. It
00:24:46.520isn't always been this adversarial, but now it is. So that's what's going to define, first of all,
00:24:52.240the next few years, and secondly, how she composes her cabinet. Yeah. Okay. Well, speaking of Ottawa,0.83
00:24:59.620Let's go to Ottawa for a little bit here.
00:25:03.880There's a part of me that feels bad for David Johnson right now.
00:25:07.820You know, it's not elder abuse the way the Democrats are using Joe Biden.
00:25:11.760I feel like that's just like, come on, let great-grandpa retire.
00:25:17.000You're abusing him by putting him up there.
00:25:19.140David Johnson's still got his marbles.
00:25:20.660He seems to still be fully clicking along.
00:25:24.440But I feel like he was almost abused by being put in this position.
00:25:27.520He should have obviously said no. I actually think he probably accepted it with the best of intentions. And even if he was doing a good job, which I don't think he is, but even if he was, the perception is that he cannot, because he clearly has too many ample conflicts of interest in his relationship with Justin Trudeau.
00:25:47.660So he's taken all of this abuse, I think rightfully so. And then parliament voted, a majority of parliament, all the opposition voted for an NDP motion. And the NDP are not known as the toughest critics of the liberals around. They voted demanding he step aside. And he refused, saying, well, but my mandate comes from the prime minister, all but saying, I'm Trudeau's man. You can't fire me because you didn't hire me. I don't work for Trudeau. I don't work for the representatives of the people.
00:26:15.860I work with Trudeau. And then I believe it was yesterday he appeared at a parliamentary committee. And it was just sad. He's a man who's been generally held in great esteem. I mean, he might be the definition of a Laurentian elite, but a man of genuine public service and just totally unable to answer questions satisfactorily.
00:26:39.680He's now spending oodles of taxpayers money on hiring navigator at crisis communications firms that try and rehabilitate his image and what he's doing.
00:26:49.680It's a fall far from, it's a fall, far fall from grace.
00:26:55.180Nigel, is there any way at all for Johnson to salvage his reputation at this point?
00:31:18.840And so, I mean, he could have, if he'd put out a detailed report that looked like, you know, document your inquiries, your conclusions, then people could say, okay, the guy gave it a very serious investigation and he came to the conclusion.
00:31:32.900He might not agree with the conclusions, but it was a genuine effort.
00:31:35.680But we're not seeing evidence that he even did that.
00:31:38.860So, yeah, if he's stuck in it for life, I'd say, okay, you know what?
00:31:41.300People aren't satisfied with my conclusions.
00:31:43.780Give me another four weeks to put this together.
00:31:46.260Try to get some other people to help him with it then and have a good, solid report to give out.
00:31:50.320Because that looked like something a high schooler would have put out as an assignment, not a man of his stature.
00:31:57.040And, you know, the other thing that he needs and doesn't have, and this is what he would ask for if he was put in the position that you're addressing from Derek's question.
00:32:06.160the reporter does not have power to subpoena anybody. So he's never going to be able to
00:32:12.320talk to the people who really know what's going on and get them to fess up.
00:32:16.080All we got was, we don't need an inquiry, and I can't tell you why.
00:32:21.520Take my word for it. I'm sorry, no one's word is that good enough. Okay,
00:32:28.080we're going to stick in Ottawa for a little bit here.
00:32:29.840I don't want to go back to COVID. I got so sick of it. I know some of you probably want to talk about it forever.
00:32:39.580I never got sick from COVID, but I'm sick of COVID. But, I mean, there's still some accounts to settle here.
00:32:50.120And Blacklock's reporter, you know, who we contract to do a lot of great investigative journalism, they found a doozy of a memo.
00:33:01.940So bear with me, folks. There's a bit here, but this is really interesting stuff.
00:33:07.440So this was a secret memo for the Privy Council Office.
00:33:12.800The Privy Council Office is essentially the bureaucratic wing of the prime minister's office.
00:33:16.420And it states that injuries and vaccines caused by the COVID-19 vaccine, I should say vaccines, there's quite a few different ones.
00:33:26.420Those injuries or deaths have the potential to quote to quote have the potential to shake public confidence.
00:33:34.420Adverse effects following immunization news reports and the government's response to them have the potential to shake public confidence in the COVID-19 vaccination rollout.
00:33:43.420rollout said the memo titled testing behaviorally informed messaging in response to severe adverse
00:33:50.620events following immunization that's a very bureaucratic title if i've ever heard one
00:33:55.900uh so black clocks reporter got this through an access to information requests
00:34:00.460um approximately five months after the department of health granted its first license to the pfizer
00:34:06.860BioNTech vaccine. Here's a quote from the memo that really stood out. The current study proactively tested the impact of various messaging strategies delivered through different messengers in response to a hypothetical adverse effect following immunization.
00:34:26.860It goes on to say that they need to minimize the perception or impact of deaths or injuries, stating that there's a chance of it happening, the chance of happening to me is one in a million rather than it has happened five different times.
00:34:45.080Now, it's one of those cases where both will be factually correct.
00:34:49.840You know, if you have five million people, a million people, five deaths, and, you know, it's the same numbers.
00:35:06.060And I guess that's the discussion here is, was this, governments message everything.
00:35:14.040They spin everything. I mean, that's just politics. That's just government. There is literally nothing that comes out of the government, no matter how benign, that it's not spun, that it's not messaged.
00:35:24.400But does this cross the line from kind of the usual government spin into propaganda?
00:35:30.660Yes, it does. They knew that there were people were going to be harmed by these vaccines.
00:35:39.380they knew that then uh the vaccines at the time that this was all being done
00:35:44.340were not fully tested it couldn't be there was a big rush on it
00:35:50.260and they knew there were there was something was going to go wrong so they said well when it does
00:35:54.500we still need to keep control of the situation we want everybody to to do as they're told and shut
00:36:01.300up so what are we going to say and this is the kind of discussion that would go on in any
00:36:08.340communications department about well just a second let's choose positive words not not words
00:36:14.260that condemn ourselves uh but what's the proof of the of the pudding i guess those people who
00:36:22.900doubted them in may 2021 can now look and see what the public health agency has reported in
00:36:29.060canada namely that out of the nearly 100 million dollar 100 million doses administered there were
00:36:36.42020,000 serious adverse effects, including more than 400 deaths. Now, what they when they announce
00:36:46.180those numbers, which I believe, they also say, but of course, we have no evidence that the death was
00:36:52.100connected to the vaccine. Although they certainly made no bones about connecting any death during
00:36:58.420COVID to COVID. Remember, we had the story of kid who died of brain cancer in Okotoks. And he
00:37:05.140happened to have COVID when he was dead. The Alberta government said that was a COVID death.
00:37:09.620Yeah and and people would go in for one thing and be tested while they were in there and
00:37:14.580they got shot at a lockdown anti-lockdown protest they probably call it a COVID death.
00:37:19.220So you know there was a very definite intention at the outset to deceive that's what that says
00:37:25.300and that's propaganda. Corey okay let's try to untangle personal feelings about about this stuff
00:37:32.100Oh, I have no personal feelings on this. Yeah, but more of a hypothetical question. I mean, and the number of adverse effects and deaths is widely disputed. There is some evidence the government's not been, provincial governments have not been particularly forthright about this.
00:37:49.400But let's speak in the hypothetical for a moment that is relevant to this. And if you are, you know, you're in charge of the government here. And yeah, there's going to be deaths from this vaccine, but you believe that on balance, this is hugely, it'll save far, far more lives.
00:38:10.160that it is objectively a public good. Would it be wrong to lie about it to get a higher vaccine
00:38:20.620uptake if, you know, you've got the evidence in front of you and it is clear as day, it's black
00:38:27.300and white, this is going to, on net, save a lot of lives. Is it a good idea to tell, is it just a
00:38:35.460white lie? No, it's still wrong to lie to the public. Make your case better than based on those
00:38:41.780facts to make it to the public. There's some people that they're never going to accept
00:38:45.760vaccinations as being safe or effective. There's still people clamoring about, you know, the false
00:38:52.100story of vaccines causing autism from childhood vaccines years ago. You're not going to get
00:38:56.600through to them anyway. And we've seen they will lose their jobs. They will do anything to avoid
00:39:01.880being vaccinated. So there's no sense spinning to try and change your approach to them.
00:39:06.380Anyhow, just on a case of morality, I know when you start taking that leap thinking, well,
00:39:11.840I'll lie to them for their own good. We know that can really, really go downhill really quickly. And
00:39:17.640as Nigel dug up too, I mean, we're seeing, and this is where their lie could catch up with them.
00:39:23.100I mean, we're seeing some legal compensations have been paid out into the millions now to some people
00:39:27.420for vaccine injuries. If it's getting determined that the government hid some of the potential
00:39:31.320risk from these, those settlements are going to go up a lot more. And if they've just been truthful
00:39:35.900to begin with, rather than trying to spin, they could say, look, we've put the risk, it was a very
00:39:40.280minimal risk, a very outlying risk, and the benefits gained, they could claim, or, you know,
00:39:45.120I don't want to argue with the viewers, but from reducing COVID deaths were worth it, fine. But
00:39:50.240now that it looks like there was deception, boy, this is far from a finished issue now.
00:39:55.480but it's a fine line i mean the memo did not recommend lying no um it just recommends a very
00:40:03.960strong spin on things a tilt on things yeah and as i said like you know the difference between uh
00:40:09.800one in a million or you know five people out of five million it's not that's not a lie that's just
00:40:19.000you know statistics them statistics and lies i mean it's it's it is technically it's factual
00:40:24.280it's just a different way of looking at it. Is that wrong? Yeah. Just don't sugarcoat it.
00:40:31.880Put it out with confidence and still say these are the numbers. And I can strongly recommend
00:40:35.880you do this. I mean, put your pressures on, you know, I really think it would be responsible for
00:40:41.160people to do this and things like that. But if you're going to start, you know, this is all the
00:40:46.040benefits and then quickly to mumble, this is the risk. That's not that's already hiding a risk.
00:40:50.100And I don't see it personally as a moral stance to take.
00:40:54.440Nigel, I think for most people, COVID is the rear of the mirror.
00:40:58.600They don't want to relitigate it anymore.
00:41:02.760I don't think there's going to be any real consequence in all of this, right?
00:41:45.300Are the companies, are these pharmaceutical companies being open enough? Are governments being open? And they were hesitant, got it, thinking, okay, I guess I'll try, I'll do it. Then they look at this stuff and they say, not next time. And it'll be the same thing, I think, all the time.
00:42:01.760It'll be the same thing with lockdowns, because I know some of our viewers will disagree with this.
00:42:05.560I think there are theoretically extreme enough circumstances that could justify a lockdown.
00:42:11.600And I hate saying that, but I mean, you know, like Hollywood style apocalypse, bubonic plagues.
00:42:20.180OK, the problem is next time there, if this happens again in living memory.
00:42:26.920Not enough people are going to believe it. I'm going to say, I remember the last time you told us to stay in our houses.
00:42:31.760but walmart did fine screw you i'm going out and so it just damages trust in these institutions
00:42:37.600uh that theoretically need to be trusted in certain circumstances and they've now they've
00:42:43.120clearly squandered and wasted that trust they have and you know isn't it interesting that in the same
00:42:47.440week in the same pipeline program we're talking about two issues where public trust has been
00:42:52.960seriously undermined by the actions of the government i mean this is not a bunch of little
00:42:58.080ultra ultra people running around saying hey you can't trust the government the government has
00:43:02.960appointed a special rapporteur who should have known better now nobody trusts the outcome anything
00:43:08.040that he says as a consequence yeah now you've got a story like this uh you know they knew stuff that
00:43:13.680they weren't telling us they could have been straight up but they chose not to it gets over
00:43:18.120the course of a year it just gets worse and worse and worse yeah all right uh we have just a tiny
00:43:24.360Tiny bit of time to sneak in under the line. The latest rape, COVID rape hotel. Perhaps, perhaps that's overstating the case too much. Perhaps not. We don't know. But if sexual assaults, that's a broad term that can mean bad to really, really bad.0.89
00:43:41.720So, Michelle Rampelgarner, Calgary Conservative MP, using her privilege as a member of Parliament to demand questions from the government, got some interesting stuff.
00:43:53.340So, the Public Health Agency of Canada says it's aware of two sexual assault complaints filed by travellers.0.94
00:44:00.200I love how they say travellers. Let's back up. These are not travellers.1.00
00:44:04.500These are people kidnapped by the federal government. Western Centre was actually the very first media outlet to break this.
00:44:10.860People will be returning from overseas and you don't have a vaccine passport.
00:44:16.560The federal government literally kidnapped you if you didn't willfully come with them.
00:44:20.680And they were snatching people up from the from airports.
00:44:23.360We had one who was snatched up from the Calgary Airport, I believe.
00:44:29.140Whisked away in a vehicle, put in one of these COVID prison hotels, and they didn't even inform the family.0.54
00:44:35.320The family's like, where the hell is it?
00:44:36.480Just whisked away, essentially kidnapped without violating the criminal code, just kidnapped. And so people are put in these so-called quarantine places. So I guess I couldn't even finish my quote because the federal government refers to them as travelers. No, they were prisoners. These were prisoners who have not been charged with any real crime.
00:44:54.840But they were aware of two sexual assault complaints filed by travelers while abiding by the government's hooting quarantine measures since March 1st, 2020.
00:45:09.920So Garner says that this week in response to an order paper question, I filed the government revealed that a second sexual assault against a traveler allegedly occurred at one of the government quarantine hotels nearly three months later.
00:45:21.800This is because the federal health minister, Patty Andrew, she told Parliament that she'd taken actions to prevent further assaults. Nothing else is going to happen. Rape hotels are not a thing, but it turned out there was another one.
00:45:39.600I guess we don't have the quarantine jails anymore, Corey, but I don't know. What does this say? Government said no more rapes. No, no.0.84
00:45:49.700I guess we've got to be quick, but it's appalling if the government's going to seize people, if they're going to detain people, that makes them fully responsible for the safety of the people they've snatched up, and they drop the ball, and they put those people at risk and perhaps into harm.
00:46:02.960And it's got to be investigated, and it's just unconscionable.
00:46:08.260I think we're going to get really here much.
00:46:10.480I haven't seen this reported anywhere else yet in the media outside the Western Standard.
00:46:14.560Maybe it's been picked up somewhere, but I don't know, Dijil.
00:46:18.040Do you think there's any consequence for this?0.98
00:46:20.080Liberals kidnapping people, putting them in hotels where they're getting sexually assaulted?
00:46:24.060You're asking whether much comes of it when the police investigate the police.
00:46:28.040I doubt that there will be much consequence.