00:01:45.300He's getting into some of the more serious things in political discourse and debate and all that stuff we do around here.
00:01:50.340We got Benjamin Woodfindon. He's a doctoral student, a young fella, and political and constitutional theorist.
00:01:57.180And he's written stuff, he's done stuff online, and he wrote a really good column on populism and how it's been labeled.
00:02:05.140And it's not particularly the type of populism we have going on right now isn't actually as crazy or extreme or pursuing as much change as it can.
00:02:14.840But it's being used as a term against Pierre Polyev's campaign, for example.
00:02:18.820So it'll be a good discussion just on those definitions. What is populism? Is it bad? Is it
00:02:23.140good? Personally, I think it can be both. It depends on what they're doing. After that, I'm
00:02:27.020going to have George Porter on. Now, he's a veteran Alberta paramedic. He's been lobbying for years and
00:02:33.240years on fixing Alberta's emergency services system. I mean, we've got some serious, serious
00:02:39.020problems. Ambulances are being drawn away from rural areas. Red alerts are happening all the
00:02:44.180time when there's no ambulances available in urban areas and rural areas and people are getting hurt
00:02:50.180so uh you know there's a lot of discourse going on on last weekend's incident with the dogs
00:02:54.900I don't know if his reporter's going to go so much into that because it's recent and there's
00:02:58.180still facts coming out but it's brought the issue to a head and you know it's worth discussing
00:03:02.960further so since people are looking at the ambulance service let's talk about the real
00:03:06.500problems going on and then right at the end I'm going to have Dr. Leslyn Lewis on just a quick
00:03:10.40010-minute shot. And it was her press release that caught my eye on the World Economic Forum
00:03:15.660kind of travel program, this idea of a digital ID, things that would be shared by Canadians,
00:03:21.400well, by the Canadian government on your behalf, with the World Economic Forum or with international
00:03:26.080type of organizations. And of course, she is in opposition to that. So it'll be good to talk to
00:03:33.100Dr. Lewis and see where she's going with that, because nobody else is really talking about it
00:03:38.060on the federal leadership front. So yes, comments. I can see people coming in from all over Chauvin.
00:03:43.200Yes, that land of that big softball. What's that? Straight down from Provost there. Folks out in
00:03:48.440BC, all over the place again. I love seeing you checking in, guys. It lets me know you're out
00:03:52.880there and that we're reaching people. So just keep the comments civil, but by all means, use that
00:03:57.880comment, scroll, and discuss with each other, throw questions my way, throw questions towards
00:04:01.500the guests. All right, let's get on to what's got me going today. Speaking of populism, well, the
00:04:07.140opposite of populism is elitism powered by authoritarianism. Climate change extremists
00:04:13.840are being indulged by authoritarian governments to try and force people out of their vehicles. And
00:04:19.460while they're failing terribly at getting people out of their cars, they're causing stress and
00:04:24.000economic damage with their efforts. They can't create appeal for their plans with the majority
00:04:28.160of citizens, so they're counting on top-down government efforts to further their agenda.
00:04:32.800And they're getting that effort, you know, getting that help.
00:04:36.180Despite over a decade of effort on the part of governments to push us into electric vehicles, for example,
00:04:44.320Electric cars remain an expensive luxury for urban dwelling virtue signalers.
00:04:49.280We've spent billions trying to force people to embrace electrical vehicles, and it's failed.
00:04:53.800Governments are responding, though, by spending billions more
00:04:56.360and continuing to punish people who choose to drive personal internal combustion vehicles.
00:05:01.900Now, in municipalities across North America, expensive and essential roadway access has been taken away from cars and given over to segregated bicycle lanes.
00:05:11.480This has only increased traffic congestion in urban centers, and the number of dedicated bicycle commuters has relained as low as it ever was.0.76
00:05:18.660Come on, there's only so many spandex aficionados who are really going to go to all that trouble to ride all the way into work and back every day.
00:05:25.060There's always been a small core of them. It doesn't get any bigger.
00:05:28.320City planners have felt that if they could just make traffic bad enough
00:06:40.580Well, in many cities, transit's been overrun with addicts, creating disorder and mayhem.
00:06:45.620In Calgary, thanks to the honor system for fare payment, coupled with a woke city council who refused to crack down on what they call vulnerable people,
00:06:52.640the transit system has turned into a dystopian nightmare.
00:06:56.180Violent incidents on trains are commonplace,
00:06:58.360while discarded syringes and human waste decorate bus shelters and train stations.
00:07:03.340City Council in Calgary actually closed a number of train stations
00:07:06.180due to the encampments of violent addicts in them, rather than dealing with the issue.
00:07:10.860Ridership on Calgary transits at 64% of what it was only two years ago,
00:08:34.040Climate zealots just can't seem to realize
00:08:36.040they need to create a realistic alternative to cars
00:08:38.860before people are going to stop using them.
00:08:41.680Electric cars are still too expensive and impractical for most people.
00:08:45.720Bicycles are a novelty and a hobby for most.
00:08:48.180Transit is not nearly safe or good enough for people to rely on.
00:08:51.740If the anti-car crowd would address building an alternative to cars first, they'd have a great deal more success in convincing people to give up on them.
00:09:01.800Do they really think that a parent of four kids is going to ride a bus and haul groceries for a family that size four times a week?
00:09:08.480Do they think a person in their 60s is going to ride a bicycle an hour to work every day in January?
00:09:14.560Do they think a slight young woman is going to subject herself daily to the criminal mayhem on trains in order to get to work?
00:09:20.060Suburbs and satellite cities are booming while the inner city neighborhoods are declining.
00:09:24.580Urban planners and climate zealots have to stop, quit, you know, trying to use the stick
00:13:57.260Well, you see, you know, I used to be able to name the whole news crew quickly just to give them all a thumbs up.
00:14:02.400But we have over a dozen folks all across out there bringing this stuff to you, writing these stories and getting them out there.
00:14:08.360So, again, this is where I like to remind everybody the reason we can do that, the reason we're covering this,
00:14:13.020the reason we're giving you an alternative from the legacy media, the tax bailed out media is because of you guys who have been subscribing.
00:14:19.380So, again, thank you all to those who have subscribed already.
00:14:23.920and if you haven't yet, get on there, check it out, westernstandard.news slash membership
00:14:29.200for $10 a month or even less if you go with an annual plan at $99 a year, you get full
00:14:35.020unfettered access to all of our columns, our news stories, breaking stories, all of those
00:14:40.460things on the website. It's well worth it. Again, we never thought twice about paying
00:14:44.200for a newspaper subscription back in the past, you know, which would cost you more than this
00:14:49.180and you'd have a whole bunch of newspaper to have to get rid of afterwards. We're not asking
00:14:52.460for charity. We're just asking for you to pay for us to provide a service so that we can keep
00:14:57.300expanding and doing as we have. And so again, take out a subscription. That's how we can support
00:15:01.800independent media and we can keep going and keep expanding. Look at all those names. That's just
00:15:05.040the news department there. Plus we have a whole pile of freelancers and other folks who are
00:15:09.500contributing things and columnists. And that is thanks to you. And I should move on, I guess,
00:15:14.000and talk about the other aspect and support our sponsors and advertisers. Again, like newspaper
00:15:20.080subscriptions. You paid to get it to your door, but also you would get some advertising in there.
00:15:24.800That's how we compare bills. It's capitalism. It's great. And in our case, we have advertisers,
00:15:28.720one of which is Bitcoin Well. And those guys have been a great sponsor for us for quite some time.
00:15:34.560They're a Western Canadian company. I'll show you how can I not like that. You know, it's a
00:15:39.120bricks and mortar thing. It's not some digital business way overseas or something like that.
00:15:43.520This is a publicly traded company with ATMs all across Canada. If you're looking to get into
00:15:48.640digital currencies get involved with that this is the way to go this is the way to keep your money
00:15:52.720safe sit down you can have one-on-one in-person consultations with these guys to see if maybe
00:15:58.480bitcoin's not for you maybe it is the bottom line is you need to learn about it and these guys are
00:16:03.040a trustworthy source to do so and you always hang on to your money if you're going to get involved
00:16:07.360in it it's non-custodial it's always in your wallet they're just helping you along with the
00:16:11.680the process. So check them out, bitcoinwell.com and take control of your money. Okay, let's see
00:16:18.720before we get on to our guest, maybe we'll go on on some news stuff. Yeah, so something Dave was
00:16:24.220talking about. And we'll talk more with my guest a little later. With AHS, boy, the finger pointing
00:16:29.740game is going all over on that awful incident for people from other regions who might not have been
00:16:35.040familiar with it. A few days ago, an 86 year old woman was attacked in her garden by three pit bull
00:16:42.720type dogs. She was terribly mauled. And she passed away. She passed away before she even got to the
00:16:48.380hospital. And it was found that the ambulance had taken over half an hour to get to her. So now all
00:16:55.500the fingers are pointing in all sorts of directions. Whose fault is this? And one of the worst that
00:16:59.820I've seen and we've seen the pleas from the woman who called 9-1, the neighbor went outside and saw
00:17:06.500her elderly neighbor having been mauled terribly by three dogs. She called 9-1-1 and it sounds like
00:17:12.880it turned into a gong show, but AHS is sort of blaming her. They're sort of making it sound like
00:17:16.580the caller wasn't clear on what happened and she's pretty upset. It's unfortunate after a tragedy,
00:17:21.840we get a bunch of finger pointing rather than Alberta health services maybe just saying,
00:17:25.360hey, something went wrong, let's fix it. But no, they're trying to blame the caller. And it's
00:17:32.340bizarre. It sounds like Bylaw Services was the first one who showed up. So yes, the woman called
00:17:36.380in a dog attack, then you do want to call Bylaw Services. But when she called in, she also said
00:17:42.060they attacked an 86-year-old woman who's bleeding to death in her backyard. I mean, the AHS is
00:17:48.400claiming we didn't realize it was a life-threatening situation. Come on. And they're claiming the
00:17:52.680caller didn't make that clear. I don't know. You see, they won't release the transcript. How clear
00:17:56.820was it? But even then, even once the bylaw officer got there, the bylaw officer was trying to at
00:18:02.040least bypass what sounds like some incompetent or messed up 911 systems and get directly to an
00:18:08.100ambulance to bring them over. And as I brought up earlier in the show, Foothills Hospital, the biggest
00:18:12.360hospital in Alberta, was only four kilometers away. It was in an ambulance, probably an eight
00:18:17.840minute drive most. And there's always ambulances sitting around the hospital because they're doing
00:18:21.560hallway care. And I'm going to talk to my later guest about that, the paramedic I have coming on.
00:18:27.160But instead, this bylaw officer is desperately calling while this poor woman is dying in her1.00
00:18:31.240backyard to get that. Instead, he managed to get fire trucks to arrive. So fire trucks arrived and
00:18:37.100tried to stabilize the woman. And the fire trucks managed to get through and get to an ambulance and
00:18:42.640get an ambulance out there. By then it was way too late. It had been 35 minutes as this poor woman
00:18:48.540passed away. And as I'd heard from another paramedic, you know, staying anonymous, but he
00:18:51.780said, word is they definitely could have saved her if somebody had intervened in time. I mean,
00:18:56.700this was a case of trauma and bleeding. And Brenda, pit bull type. Yes, because it was pit bull types.1.00
00:19:03.620They were. They were Stratfordshire Terriers. And I'm going to get more on that. That's a
00:19:07.580separate discussion altogether. Fair enough from a commenter. I'll state right off the bat,
00:19:13.640I don't like the idea of knee-jerk breed bans at all.
00:29:17.120really kind of changes what your, maybe doesn't change your view of someone like Polyev, but it
00:29:22.000certainly might temper your fears or your expectations, right? Yeah, well, if there's
00:29:27.680any hallmark, I guess you could say of a malignant populism, when a leader or a figure is trying to
00:29:33.440incite or get the people up against, you know, they like to take advantage of xenophobia,
00:29:38.400and immigration or foreigners is often a tempting target for them. And you kind of go into that as
00:29:44.560well, at least whatever may be going on with Polyev, immigration hasn't been an area where
00:29:49.060he's been radical or trying to stir up any sort of negative movements of any sort.
00:29:55.500No, exactly. And to be, you know, I should say as a first generation immigrant myself,
00:29:58.640I am, you know, I'm quite pleased with that, right? So I'm not, you know, I'm not, I'm not
00:30:02.020opposed to immigration. I think we can certainly have debates about, you know, the number of
00:30:06.220immigrants we have, but it's amazing that even, you know, we had a record number of immigrants
00:30:12.600to Kandassia was about 400,000 and you know again we don't necessarily have any arguments about
00:30:18.600specific numbers right but the idea that that is kind of beyond the pale of public discourse I've
00:30:23.240always thought is kind of very strange right like these are certainly questions people should be
00:30:27.000able to ask and not be kind of terrified of you know what they'll be accused of being
00:30:31.560if they bring it up but yeah that was I tried to make the point in the piece that you know
00:30:36.840Polly it's not challenging that right if anything he's he's trying to appeal to immigrant communities
00:30:41.400which again i don't think uh is a bad thing right i think that's probably a good thing especially
00:30:45.320if he wants to win the election um but again you know he's you know he's being you know some of
00:30:49.480the people he's been compared to right like people like donald trump and uh marine le pen like the
00:30:52.920idea that what polio is saying there would be kind of you know acceptable to the most hardcore you
00:30:57.800know most devoted supporters of someone like trump for example it's just kind of silly right like
00:31:02.200these are different people and we should stop kind of uh we should stop engaging with we should stop
00:31:06.600using these kind of lazy, lazy comparisons. One other kind of it. So the piece, the piece in
00:31:13.180question was, was fairly long. You know, I won't say it was short. There was actually, and there
00:31:17.600was actually a separate section that got cut just for space constraints. And one of the other kind
00:31:23.180of, so, you know, immigration is obviously one of the third rails of Canadian politics. The other,
00:31:28.440and I think it's going to be, you know, we're going to be having discussions about this
00:31:30.700the very near future again is abortion right um now again it's just kind of an object it tend to
00:31:37.000be a descriptive observation uh lewis i think is going to be a guest later right um leslie lewis
00:31:42.340is kind of the you know the social conservative in the conservative leadership race right now
00:31:45.740um she's the she's the pro-life um the pro-life option uh but again if you actually go and look
00:31:51.320at what she's proposing and what she's campaigning on it's fairly modest stuff in terms of what she's
00:31:55.740So there's a ban on sex-selective abortions.
00:31:59.120There's, I think, a ban on, like, overseas funding for abortions.
00:32:02.440But even, like, even Lesley Lewis, you know, the social conservative, the pro-life MP in the race, she would never even think to propose something like, it amazes me when I talk to Canadians and they think that, you know, we have kind of, when you tell them about, you know, like, European style, how abortion is generally regulated in Europe versus America, you know, most European countries, I think the abortion limit is around 12 weeks.
00:32:24.280it varies a little bit but that's you know that's fairly early on right and a pregnancy is basically
00:32:28.680um at the end of the first trimester um but leslie lewis you know our radical scary social
00:32:34.120so you know the one that's going to put us back to theocracy if you listen to listen to certain0.99
00:32:37.960people she's not proposing you know like a french style or european style uh abortion limits what
00:32:43.560she's proposing are pretty pretty small it's pretty pretty uh you know not unambitious and modest
00:32:49.560restrictions by comparison so on all sorts of these topics right these third rail topics these taboos
00:32:54.840um we really don't have like true radical challenges to them again there might be
00:32:58.920voices here and there but there certainly isn't like kind of mainstream organized movement that
00:33:03.160challenges these things we have this fairly narrow and i would suggest you know for better
00:33:07.240for us i'd say for worse on many things it's very narrow and very stable consensus on all sorts of
00:33:12.360topics yeah and and uh as you said i'm glad you brought it up you know ms lewis's position on
00:33:18.840on abortion actually is really where a lot of American Democrats would land. I mean,
00:33:24.080she would be considered pretty moderate compared to some of the more activist Republicans amongst
00:33:28.200the bunch. But to even broach the issue immediately starts getting that pushback. And I mean,
00:33:36.120is that a bit of a cultural thing within Canada too? Although I mean, are we afraid of substantial
00:33:41.220change? Like, is that why populism as a pejorative is as effective as it can be sometimes when it's
00:33:46.740used against people because we don't embrace any large radical changes or at least we haven't
00:33:51.640traditionally you know we talk big but as you said even when these people get into power who
00:33:56.480did it on a populist wave they don't tend to really change a whole heck of a lot structurally
00:34:00.340or substantially once they get there yeah um yeah that's my my kind of i think this is true not just
00:34:05.820in canada but in other places i think canada is generally a more um uh maybe kind of temperamentally
00:34:11.200modest right place i don't think canada canadians i think are much less quick to kind of anger and
00:34:15.900age maybe than other places and i think sometimes that's good and i think sometimes that's bad right
00:34:20.140i think sometimes we should get angry about things that we kind of just let government get away with
00:34:23.900um but uh you know i think um yeah it's even even um there's obviously kind of structural reasons
00:34:31.260right why um sometimes changes are just hard to make right there's a kind of status quo that is
00:34:36.540a status quo for a reason right it's entrenched um and there's so in the desire to you know it
00:34:41.580takes real real if there is a if there's some sort of major reform you want to embark on
00:34:46.220um it's going to take real significant kind of desire and will and kind of motivation to do it
00:34:50.540um so in many ways kind of just a kind of benign status quo prevails not so much because it's
00:34:55.340popular but just because kind of the the effort to undo it or change it uh which it would take a lot
00:35:00.460of work uh in the other way um and you know and it depends we can there's all we could go through
00:35:05.740issue by issue right there's all sorts of things that um you know there are things in canada i
00:35:09.500I would like to see changed. It doesn't mean that's going to happen, right? It's just kind
00:35:12.880of a real, it kind of is just unfortunate or fortunate, depending on your perspective,
00:35:17.280and unfortunate reality about how this country works. I think one kind of major problem we have
00:35:23.080in Canada is we do have, and this was, again, kind of a broader kind of point about this piece,
00:35:27.240is we do have a very narrow kind of, you know, I don't want to get too technical, but people
00:35:31.140sometimes call the over to the window, right? We really do have a kind of narrow window of what
00:35:35.260generally considered acceptable opinions. So, plenty of people might hold opinions that are
00:35:41.740actually kind of, you know, outside that fairly narrow window, but especially in kind of media
00:35:46.940and kind of discourse, that window is so narrow that people that hold those perspectives might
00:35:50.780either, you know, not express them at all, or just kind of very subtly kind of, you know,
00:35:55.420hint at it here and there, but be kind of worried about kind of the consequences of saying so. I
00:36:01.500I mean, if regardless of whether, you know, maybe even if someone generally likes kind of the status quo in Canada today, I would suggest we'd actually benefit from having a kind of wider discourse where there's just a wider range of kind of, you know, permitted, acceptable opinion precisely so that we can actually have more kind of serious, serious engagements and debates over kind of major issues and major topics.
00:36:22.700I don't think Canada's well served at all by having kind of a very narrow, kind of very thin consensus, because it really just allows a lot of kind of complacency and shallow and sloppy thinking.
00:36:33.060Right. So, again, even if you generally like kind of, you know, broadly speaking, the kind of consensus in Canada, I think we benefit from a more open, more open, open culture.
00:36:42.100We can actually have debates about things that maybe, you know, people don't want to have debates about right now for various reasons.
00:43:01.260you'd be hard pressed to find 22% of Canadians
00:43:04.760who even really know what the CRTC is.
00:43:07.480So this organization that really kind of operated
00:43:09.920in the background of government for a long, long time
00:43:11.960is now starting to become front and center
00:43:13.760and what people are seeing, they aren't liking.
00:43:16.640I mean, you know, how often do you see any bureaucracy where you, you know, aside from perhaps the Canadian Revenue Agency, where a lot of people all at once would say, no, I actually do not like that agency whatsoever. And in the case of the CRTC, yeah, we're looking at almost a quarter of Canadians surveying say they have an unfavorable opinion of this, you know, which is really just a bureaucratic regulatory body.
00:43:37.360but that's because of all these announcements.
00:44:34.740That's where we feel like we're screaming into the wind sometimes.
00:44:37.500And I know in a few minutes, I'm going to have my next guest on.
00:44:39.900And this is a gentleman who's been screaming into the wind about the ambulance coverage in Alberta for years now.
00:44:44.560I mean, I was looking up some stuff that Mr. Porter had been doing and news articles from seven years ago, you know, talking about what we're seeing now.
00:51:52.080Nobody will stand up and do the right thing for the staff or for patient care.
00:51:57.840And that's exacerbating the problem. I mean, we're even hearing from other facets saying, oh, we just need more money. We need more resources because we're shorthanded. Well, there's some truth to that, but they're wearing out existing paramedics through this. I imagine the stress of being in such a broken system, I mean, isn't keeping staff retention very high.
00:52:17.660oh it we have last i heard was 42 percent of the medics are booked off a lot of them with
00:52:24.800they're just exhausted they're worn out you know and hs ems comes on the news once in a while pats
00:52:31.480everybody on the head says how much they love the medics aren't they wonderful and but they don't
00:52:35.900have their back and and the medics know that and we've had a few brave medics that stand up and
00:52:40.740and and uh even using ahs's own data and they get suspended and one of them while he's suspended
00:52:50.480for a week his ambulance is out of service because they got no staff to man it we got 350 400 shifts
00:52:58.540a week in this province that are uncovered they don't have enough medics and
00:53:03.440And if they did have enough medics, they don't have enough ambulances anymore.
00:53:12.020Well, and then that's something you did bring up, I believe, again, at that town hall I went to was the discipline on anybody who speaks up.
00:53:19.760Like, there's no real whistleblower legislation or anything to protect somebody from within the system.
00:53:23.640If they speak up, they find themselves out of a job, which only adds to the problem.
00:55:11.480So I can only assume there's paramedics associated with those ambulances all sitting around doing hallway care in that hospital rather than being out in the streets taking care of people in emergency situations.
00:55:22.540Like, what is it going to take to force the issue to say, look, these aren't nurses, these aren't doctors, these are emergency care professionals, take these patients and let them get back to work?
00:55:32.860They say that the medics can't leave because that's potentially patient abandonment.
00:55:37.980Well, Corey, those people are in the safest place they can be.
01:07:44.580They keep putting those nice Google graphics up there showing, hey, check this out.
01:07:48.520they're dispatching an ambulance from Banff to go to Northeast Calgary, or they're sending one from
01:07:53.180Brooks to go to Airdrie. Like, it's ridiculous. And of course, what happens then when there's0.93
01:07:58.580an accident in Banff? I mean, you're sucking it from somewhere else. You're leaving another0.97
01:08:02.800potential catastrophe behind you. And how, as I said, you could see the frustration from Mr.
01:08:09.160Porter. How has it taken this long just to address this? I mean, people are screaming it from the
01:08:14.780rooftops. They're holding the meetings. People are dying. Staff are burning out. And there's
01:08:20.040solutions. This isn't something terribly complicated. As he said, there's a number of
01:08:23.300changes you could do in five minutes that will start to take the pressure off. I mean,
01:08:27.840sure, there's bigger systematic changes that have to be made and other things, but
01:08:32.340there are immediate things right in front of us that we can be doing. And we won't do it.
01:08:38.420There's this stubborn, entrenched protection of the status quo, this fear of shaking anything up.
01:08:44.400Plus, the part that infuriated me at that town hall meeting I went to as well was hearing about a paramedic who'd been disciplined and shut down for daring to speak up.
01:08:53.700So, I mean, they're trying to silence the discourse.
01:13:30.160But no, they're starting the fear machine up, and I don't think it's going to have an impact.
01:13:36.140I mean, that's the other thing I talked about a little while back and was with, it sounds like there's a push on to redefine what fully vaccinated is and making it three shots.
01:13:48.380And if they do that, well, despite all the reminders and all the pushing and everything else,
01:13:53.520less than half of Canadians have gotten their third shot, their booster.
01:13:57.760I mean, people are getting complacent.
01:13:59.460They're getting tired of being pushed and twirled around.
01:14:01.320And I've said it before, I support vaccination.
01:23:05.660Saying that Canada is the first country along with the Netherlands to sign on with the WEF's pilot project known to introduce the known traveler digital identity, it's called.
01:23:14.540Other partners include Air Canada, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, ironically, Airport in Montreal and Toronto's Pearson Airport, which of course these airports are not exactly shining examples of good stuff.
01:23:25.920um but uh she at least is speaking up on it because of course you know a lot of politicians
01:23:31.120are terrified of touching these things they don't want to talk world economic forum because they get
01:23:34.960labeled as conspiracy theorists but it's there we know that we we know they're real it's not a
01:23:38.980conspiracy it's it's an international group that really is focused on control and and uh you know
01:23:44.500how strong their control or how far they'll get towards their goals well that's what's in question
01:23:48.220so let's talk about it and this is concerning this is talk about sharing your information this
01:23:52.500is talking about a digital ID given to organizations
01:24:49.000And after that, I've got author Derek Smith.
01:24:51.140And he wrote about, where's that title? I don't have it handy. It was like a Dr. Seuss style book. Oh, yes, it was How the Prime Minister Stole Freedom. And it's like a cartoon book. And you go page by page. And it's written poetically, it rhymes and the whole works. And it's got these graphic depictions. It never actually says Justin Trudeau in it.