Triggered: The long-gun registry is back and the Liberal lies have begun
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 25 minutes
Words per minute
183.3379
Harmful content
Misogyny
5
sentences flagged
Toxicity
21
sentences flagged
Hate speech
13
sentences flagged
Summary
It's Blame Someone Else Day and today we're talking about the March for Life, abortion, and the gun registry. Plus, Western Standard columnist Trevor Tucker joins the show to talk about abortion, gun control, and more.
Transcript
00:00:30.000
Good morning. It's Friday to the 13th, 2022 of May. Welcome to Triggered. I'm Corey Morgan.
00:00:48.120
Well, lots of things to observe, you know, and I'm going to start actually by, you know,
00:00:53.260
apologizing to regular viewers and folks who were on yesterday. We were doing that experiment with
00:00:58.020
Melanie live out on the street talking to people and everything and trying things out. And I still
00:01:02.460
we're going to work more on that because I think it's great to be able to get out and interact.
00:01:05.580
But at the end of the broadcast, we also learned a hard lesson that the person who has the phone
00:01:10.060
on the other end, if they close it out, it shuts off the broadcast. So we sort of cut things short
00:01:14.280
unexpectedly yesterday. Sorry about doing that to y'all. But I was just going to rant about some
00:01:18.380
news a little longer after that. Anyways, we got through most of the good and important stuff.
00:01:23.240
And today for the observances, today is Blame Someone Else Day.
00:01:27.700
That's one of the observances out there, World Blame Someone Else Day.
00:01:30.700
It's held on the first Friday, the 13th of the year.
00:01:33.960
So we've gone all the way till May before we got one.
00:01:36.820
So again, whatever happened yesterday, hey, wasn't my fault.
00:01:40.560
I know it was yesterday, but I'm going to blame someone else for it.
00:01:43.020
Anything that might go wrong today, I'm blaming someone else for that too.
00:01:48.220
You'd be a fool and insensitive if you didn't do so.
0.98
00:01:51.320
It's also World Cocktail Day, so if blaming other people for your problems and issues hasn't worked out well enough for you,
0.99
00:01:57.080
you can drown your sorrows, and again, you have your excuse for it.
00:02:01.880
I mean, you know, I can't observe it, but I'm certain I could have a Shirley Temple or something like that
00:02:06.480
and vicariously enjoy it through others, and for you, get out there and have a drink.
00:02:11.000
Okay, we've got a good show coming up today due to some other circumstances, but it's a nice break on things.
00:02:17.060
Anyways, I had to run out. We had Conservative Party leadership candidate Roman Babber in our studios here at the Western Standard yesterday.
00:02:24.940
We had to record an interview with him, and Melanie Risden recorded that, and it's a really good talk, so we're going to run that in a little bit.
00:02:31.420
We try to do things live when we can, but when it comes to these leadership candidates and people with tight schedules, it's sometimes hard to get them right in on that slot like that.
00:02:39.240
Then we're going to talk to the Western Standard columnist, Trevor Tucker.
00:02:44.960
We're going to talk about how the abortion issue has hit.
00:02:47.400
Yes, that issue that none of us wants to talk about.
00:02:49.840
I don't really want to talk about it, but it's here.
00:02:54.220
It's a sensitive issue, but it's in the headlines, and it's going to be for a while.
00:02:59.420
And he wrote an article talking about at least how the discussion should be allowed.
00:03:02.060
And that's where Trevor and I certainly share common ground.
00:03:03.940
I think we kind of differ ideologically on that issue in itself, but we should be allowed
00:03:09.020
and we're in this cancel culture world right now
00:03:11.120
where people are trying to shut down any discussion
00:03:24.940
everybody checking in, Joanne, Ian, all, you know,
00:03:27.020
from across the country. That's that reminders, you
00:03:28.960
know, we get those technical hiccups that I blame someone else
00:03:34.880
the live part I love, you know, it comes with these
00:03:40.600
We can see that we're reaching out to people across this country and building that audience.
00:03:44.740
As a Western standard, we didn't actually really anticipate quite as much broad audience,
00:03:54.920
And let's get on with what I'm going to rant about.
00:03:57.820
So I want to talk about the long gun registry, and it's returned through a backdoor method,
00:04:02.900
And the Liberal government has assigned their top liar, Public Safety Minister Marco Mendocino, to promote it.
00:04:10.840
So, just to give some background on this minister, when he was questioned in committee meetings on the invocation of the Emergencies Act last February,
00:04:23.060
Mendocino claimed there was evidence of potential violence, insurrection, and conspiracy of foreign funding for the trucker's convoy
00:04:29.360
that justified suspending civil rights with the Emergencies Act.
00:04:32.900
he never presented that evidence though there was a claim made by that convoy participants were
00:04:38.660
responsible for an attempted arson incident in ottawa this claim was completely disproven through
00:04:44.180
a police investigation and even after that was disproven despite the proof being presented
00:04:48.740
mendoncino continued his strategy of lies when he told a commons committee at the end of april that
00:04:53.700
the arson attempt was part of the reason they justified the invocation of the act a point of
00:04:58.500
of order was called, but it doesn't really matter. Mendoncino lied, and it's been successfully
00:05:03.100
repeated again and recorded. Mendoncino claimed in February that they had evidence of a large
00:05:08.400
amount of foreign funding for the protest. This was disproven. It was found that he was referring
00:05:12.240
to a CBC story on it that had been retracted because it was BS. And then he claimed no less
00:05:20.020
than 11 lies in the House of Commons as he was asked and kept saying that the police had requested
00:05:26.020
the implementation of the Emergencies Act. RCMP Commissioner Brenda Luckey contradicted this
00:05:31.520
claim. She explained the police never offer such advice. Mendoncino shrugs, carries on,
00:05:37.320
it doesn't matter. This latest lie from Mendoncino is his most offensive. So when defending the new
00:05:43.040
liberal long gun registry, Mendoncino said that the previous liberal government long gun registry
00:05:47.440
aided police in apprehending Mark Lapine after the Montreal massacre. Now, to begin with, Lapine
00:05:54.460
blew his wretched evil brains out after he slaughtered the 14 innocent women. The police
0.99
00:05:59.600
didn't need any help in apprehending him. Secondly, the gun registry didn't even exist
00:06:04.920
until 1995, that's six years after Lapine's crime. Mendocino simply pulled the statement out of his
00:06:11.840
ass, and he used one of the worst tragedies in Canadian history in order to do it. He just
1.00
00:06:16.700
doesn't care. So what's going to happen? Nothing. He's been lying chronically for months, years
00:06:22.260
probably in his career his career is doing just fine so why stop now so let's get on to that why
00:06:28.340
are the liberals at this you know the liberals have been trying to take firearms away from law
0.77
00:06:31.620
abiding citizens for decades the long gun registry from the 1990s was implemented by the chretchen
00:06:37.300
government and justice minister alan rock it was an expensive divisive debacle and it never had any
00:06:42.740
impact on crime prevention and despite liberal claims at that time again they got a long history
00:06:47.940
of lies, that the registry would cost, oh, about $100 million. Costs ballooned over $2 billion
00:06:53.320
by the time the program was scrapped. The system was terribly organized and inefficient. It's
00:06:59.100
estimated at some points that they never managed to register more than 60% of the long guns in
00:07:02.980
Canada, even though they were at it for, what, over 10 years, I believe, and that many of those
00:07:07.360
entries were incorrect. The records in the registry were supposed to be destroyed, but they likely
00:07:12.080
never were. It was evident that the RCMP were using old registry records when they smashed into
00:07:16.980
multiple homes during the 2013 floods in High River and stole people's firearms. It was clear
00:07:21.820
that they've been targeting specific households in their searches, and it's rather tough to do
00:07:25.320
that without some kind of list of where these firearms are. When asked about the issue some
00:07:29.700
years ago, Justin Trudeau said he would never enact another long gun registry. Well, guess what?
00:07:35.500
He lied. The registry's back, and the only difference is they've dumped the onus on firearm
00:07:40.080
owners and dealers. Even if you transfer a firearm to a relative, you're going to be forced to
00:07:44.500
contact the RCMP and register the transaction, along with personal information about yourself
00:07:48.740
and the person you transfer to, and of course, the serial number of the firearm. That's called
00:07:51.940
a registry, people. All private dealers, they're going to be obligated to record any transactions
00:07:56.300
in full detail with the personal information of the person buying it, and they'll be obligated
00:08:00.460
to provide that information to police at request any time, even if they don't have a warrant.
00:08:06.360
The liberals are saying this isn't a registry. What else is it? Of course it's a registry,
00:08:10.160
and it's going to be as expensive and ineffective as the last one, but this is where it gets more
00:08:14.360
sneaky. This is where it gets more odious. We can see this time the expense is all going to be put
00:08:18.600
on the private dealers. It's going to be put on the individuals. And it still will be ineffective.
00:08:24.920
So why did they keep pushing on this? Why are they so hell-bent on registering firearms?
00:08:28.780
The answer is simple. They want to steal them. You can't effectively take away people's property
00:08:33.820
unless you know who has it and where it is. A registry is the first step. When the goal is to
00:08:38.740
disarm all law-abiding citizens, a registry is the way you have to go. Rest assured, if and when
00:08:44.340
the government feels confident they've registered enough long guns, they will illegalize and seize
00:08:49.400
them. The Liberals will deny this. And this happened in Australia already, by the way. We've
00:08:52.660
got precedent on this. And the Liberals will deny this when we ask them about it. But did I mention
00:08:58.580
they have something of a propensity for lying? Legally owned long guns barely make a statistical
00:09:03.540
blip when it comes to firearm crimes in Canada. The vast majority of violent firearm crimes are
00:09:09.120
committed with handguns that have been stolen or are smuggled across the border. The Liberal
00:09:13.260
government in Canada is an ideologically driven authoritarian regime. They have no interest in
00:09:18.140
individual rights. Of course, they don't like seeing citizens armed. Not that there's some
00:09:21.740
revolution pending. They just don't like it. The only way to stop these guys is going to be to run
00:09:25.800
them out of office. And I'm unsure if that's ever going to happen because so many Central Canadian
1.00
00:09:30.280
voters appear to like being lied to. That leaves the independence option as the last one on the
00:09:35.160
table for the West. But in the meantime, better iron your garden, guys. It's starting to rust.
00:09:40.460
All right, so let's start on some lying and some of the other terms others have used.
00:09:46.260
And cut to somebody who tells the truth most confidently, our news editor, Dave Naylor.
00:10:05.460
Okay, I got all sorts of fears and phobias and neuroses, but that's not one of them,
00:10:22.580
He got snubbed for the finalists in the Hart Trophy yesterday.
00:10:27.840
So I think that's going to be enough to spur him on
00:10:31.340
and the rest of the Calgary Flames on to a mighty victory tonight in Dallas
00:10:36.420
and bring on the winner of Edmonton and Los Angeles.
00:10:44.600
And yeah, they could put this one to bed and get some rest
00:10:52.640
Going to be a lot of Game 7s on Saturday nights.
00:11:01.120
Pope Francis announced this morning he's coming to Alberta.
00:11:04.880
It's been 38 years since the Pope has been to Alberta.
00:11:08.460
That's when Pope John Paul II held just a massive, massive mass, massive mass.
00:11:17.820
And he'll be coming again sometime in July, visiting Quebec City, Edmonton, and the Calicoite.
00:11:23.060
And this is sort of his apology tour for the Catholic Church's rule in residential schools.
00:11:30.800
Very significant ruling, Corey, this morning out of the Supreme Court of Canada, our Mel Risden is covering.
00:11:38.140
They have ruled that extreme intoxication, extreme drunkenness or stoned out of your brain is an excuse for rape and murder.
00:11:47.580
So, yeah, I mean, it's kind of mind boggling, but that's what they've ruled.
00:11:52.280
Other stuff, Daniel Smith's morning show talking about UCP balloting and Jason Kenney's leadership is still up there on our main page.
00:12:04.300
As is, you remember the boring CBC federal leaders debate in the 2021 leadership or 2021 federal election, Corey?
00:12:15.800
The boss of that says, yeah, it was pretty bad and we're going to do better next time.
00:12:22.280
uh we've got a story on uh covid uh cases uh decreasing in saskatchewan that's from our
00:12:29.720
saskatchewan reporter christopher old corn and uh but they're not decreasing in north korea corey
00:12:35.400
uh matthew horwood's gonna have a story up very shortly on uh uh despite uh going two years
00:12:41.320
without a single case the uh the hermit kingdom is now uh getting hit hard by uh hard by covid so
00:12:51.080
We've got lots of stuff to come this afternoon.
00:12:58.000
I hope all that 13 talk hasn't actually cursed Johnny Goodreau,
00:13:01.860
but I'm sure we'll all be glued to our TVs tonight to see if he can pull it off.
00:13:07.780
And there's going to be thousands of people down at the Red Lot
00:13:18.200
So it's going to be a busy night on the Red Mile.
00:13:30.620
We've got Christopher Oldcorn and Matthew Horwood
00:13:37.220
It's hard to keep up with the amount of reporters we've got.
00:13:54.300
$10 off that if you use the coupon code TRIGGERED.
00:14:10.940
And in that case, $10 a month, less than $10 a month, really,
00:14:16.460
you get full access to the whole site, the columns, the articles, the works.
00:14:21.340
And of course, you can still feel good knowing you're supporting independent media
0.66
00:14:24.500
when all the mainstream media really is that wretched and rotten.
00:14:29.360
As Dave pointed out, you know, the CBC, they're discussing that,
0.76
00:14:37.160
I'd like to find out exactly who organized that Edmonton conservative debate the other night
00:14:41.040
because boy that was a whole new level of wretched but either way I'd like to remind everybody as I
0.99
00:14:46.400
said subscribe if you haven't already and hey nag your friends family we got corporate subscriptions
0.92
00:14:51.720
by the way if you got a company or if your company has one they can bulk buy you know reach out to us
0.77
00:14:56.200
subscriptions and make sure all your staff have full access to the standard make sure they're
00:15:00.240
getting good reads to some good unfiltered news without the government interference and
00:15:06.220
taking any of your tax dollars. So let's have a look at what else we've got going on. Yeah,
00:15:11.460
just getting onto that, you know, just something I ranted about a little while ago and a few days
00:15:14.880
back was personal responsibility. You know, that's where the left and right fell apart a lot.
00:15:23.080
It gets back to that blame someone else day, I guess, thing, you know, going on. I mean,
00:15:26.540
I talked about that laughingly, but some people make a lifestyle of it.
00:15:29.240
and our system really fits to take away all personal responsibility on every other level.
00:15:37.900
So we've got a Supreme Court ruling today, as Dave mentioned.
00:15:41.840
Being drunk is a defense for rape and murder, according to the Supreme Court.
00:15:46.620
This was brought in, this was an overturning kind of in a sense, I guess.
00:15:50.680
The courts had ruled that it's not a defense some years ago,
00:15:53.540
but I guess advocates for drunk murders and rapists were effective in pushing long enough
00:16:04.800
is being drunk a defense for vehicular manslaughter
00:16:07.400
when you ram into pedestrians whilst drunk and driving?
00:16:26.240
but where where did they get this where is there any responsibility i'm sorry that you know lots
00:16:33.580
of people get drunk a lot of times i drank very heavily for for quite a few years i've been open
0.90
00:16:38.080
about that i don't drink anymore but you know what with all the stupid things i've done i got
00:16:42.040
thrown in a drunk tank for peeing in an inappropriate spot i uh got in many fights with uh you know
0.76
00:16:47.500
verbally with uh significant others i annoyed people i barfed inappropriately never once did
00:16:53.120
I rape or murder anybody. Most people who drink don't, thankfully. It's not an excuse. If somebody
00:17:00.100
gets drunk and rapes or murders somebody, they are dangerous and something is wrong with them.
00:17:04.620
And it doesn't matter if they were drunk or not. But apparently our luminaries on the Supreme Court
00:17:08.780
think, yeah, I don't know, maybe we'll let that off the hook. It's a defense. This is insane.
00:17:14.700
This is insane. And I'm certain some, again, defense lawyers for, you know, rapists and
00:17:21.580
murderers are rubbing their hands together, you know. So I guess, and I'm certainly not
00:17:25.440
counseling anybody to commit a crime, but would criminals start thinking about that? You know,
00:17:28.780
if I can manage to chug a bottle of Jack Daniels before doing something dastardly, I will have my
00:17:35.480
excuse in the bag already as to why I did it, and I'll have my defense in place. And again,
00:17:40.000
we're not talking about somebody using that as an excuse to pee on the door of a 7-Eleven like
00:17:45.200
some guy did in Calgary in 91. I'm talking about rapes and murders. So this is the court. This
00:17:53.500
is the ones that, again, as we were talking about, we were celebrating the Alberta Appeals
00:17:57.120
Court shooting down the Trudeau's No More Pipelines Bill, Bill C-69. And now it's going
00:18:03.380
to go to the Supreme Court. And I did say my rant about the other day, I don't hold a lot of the
00:18:08.140
confidence that the Supreme Court is going to uphold this. I mean, the same thing happened
00:18:13.140
before. The provincial court ruled against the carbon tax, but the Supreme Court held it up.
00:18:19.500
And now we've got a Supreme Court of people who actually think that it's okay to, well,
00:18:23.460
I'm not saying it's okay, but they're saying it's a valid defense for rape and murder if you're
00:18:28.780
intoxicated, if you're drunk. These are not the kind of minds I feel confident are going to
00:18:33.320
understand the constitutionality of our provincial jurisdiction when it comes to pipelines and such.
00:18:42.600
this is just beyond the pale. But again, I don't know. It's hard to be surprised anymore.
00:18:48.500
What's this June Marie saying? She's enjoying her Wild Rose subscription, though still misses
00:18:52.600
the old school newsprint. So do I, you know? I mean, you still couldn't beat the old paper copy
00:18:58.020
of a newspaper. You know, you get work, you'd be on break time, have a coffee, flip those pages.
00:19:01.680
If we're going far enough back, I'd be having a cigarette while I'm at it. You know, you did that
00:19:05.280
smell of the newsprint and flipping it and seeing the larger stories, the small. It's quite a
00:19:09.260
reminiscence and a good way to read, but those days are gone. As you know, oh, sorry, Adam. Yeah,
00:19:14.320
it was. Yeah, you were the guy working in the 7-Eleven, were you? Okay. I'm sorry to traumatize
00:19:19.100
you. As you know, then it was a small infraction in some ways. Either way, the newspapers now,
00:19:26.080
I mean, I was shocked when I saw one in a 7-Eleven. You know, I was behaving going into one for coffee
00:19:31.060
now. It's just paper thin. It's a flyer. Everything's online now, guys. This is the new
00:19:36.060
media. This is the way it goes. But because we don't have that infrastructure, because you don't
00:19:39.740
have that paper, you don't have those big printing rooms. And as I said, I feel a bit for the old
00:19:44.720
legacy media. In some ways, they're just carrying a massive amount of overhead, and they just can't
00:19:48.840
flex. They can't curve. We can. I mean, we have a lot of expenses. We have a lot of things we have
00:19:55.780
to cover as well, of course. But we can move a lot more quickly. We can pivot. We can change with the
00:20:00.780
times because we are digital. We're online. As we saw, again, I thank you for the patience. We had
00:20:05.020
some hiccups with our new system, but we migrated to a much stronger system for our news. And it's
00:20:09.700
a much better one. And once we really get it ironed out, it's going to be fantastic. So again,
00:20:12.980
I thank the subscribers for allowing us to evolve upwards like that. But the world's changing. And
00:20:17.400
if the media outlets won't change to go with it, well, they're going to get left behind. That's
00:20:21.920
the way it goes. So leave them behind. Keep supporting us, guys. We'll keep growing. We'll
00:20:26.100
keep giving good content. Another way before I get on to the guest interview, of course,
00:20:30.680
is our sponsors. And that's very important. That's how we keep going as well. We sell
00:20:34.740
advertising and we do it to some great sponsors. One of them is Bitcoin. Well, they were our first
00:20:39.960
big sponsor and they've still been with us because that's telling me that a lot of you guys have been
00:20:44.180
checking them out. And I appreciate that. Don't just look at the sponsors, check these guys out.
00:20:48.420
I'm being genuine when I say this. If you're interested in digital currencies, the main
00:20:53.680
thing is to safely get involved with it. Get in an informed entry into that world with your money.
00:20:58.600
and that's what these guys are about. They're about sitting down with you. They offer one-on-one
00:21:02.620
in-person service, financial advisement, I guess you could say in a sense, so that you can be
00:21:07.500
confident, and maybe it's not for you, but they will guide and tell you the ins and outs of it,
00:21:11.520
how you would get started in it, the different services they could offer, anything from
00:21:14.640
bill payment to ATMs to set up across the country to put money into your Bitcoin account.
00:21:20.300
They're a good Canadian company, and they're out West here, so check them out,
00:21:23.540
Bitcoinwell.com and take control of your money. I'll talk a little bit more about them later.
00:21:29.080
So let's get on to the guest. And as I said, because of some other things that happened,
00:21:34.540
it was an interview done by Melanie, but that's great. She does fantastic interviews.
00:21:38.800
And she spoke with conservative party leader, Canada, Canada, party of Canada,
00:21:46.860
Roman Babber. And let's run that. And we will talk a little bit about the interview after that.
00:21:52.440
I'm Melanie Risden with the Western Standard and this comes on the heels of the CPC leadership
00:21:59.960
debate. The first one that happened so far in Edmonton on Wednesday and joining me right now
00:22:06.600
is one of the leadership candidates, Roman Babber, and he is joining us to just talk a little bit
00:22:13.560
about some of his positions on some of the topics that are affecting Canadians these days and just
00:22:21.560
to let us know a little bit more about what we can expect from him if he's voted in as the
00:22:27.660
Conservative Party of Canada's leader. So thoughts on the debate. I've heard a lot of reaction on
00:22:34.800
the debate that it was strange. In fact, some people have called it the worst political debate
00:22:41.040
as far as the formalities and how it was put together. What were your thoughts on that debate?
00:22:47.180
I think that Tom Clark, the moderator, certainly lost. I think it's regretful that there was so
00:22:54.460
much emphasis at getting so many quick answers in there as opposed to actually allowing candidates
00:23:01.820
to express themselves. There's not much you can say in 15 seconds. And also the idea that somehow
00:23:10.140
they had to control effectively the the manner of the conversation and that is not to stray
00:23:18.300
into some sort of direction seems counterintuitive uh when you want to try and get to know the
00:23:24.300
candidates and this goes on the heels of of the north strong and free debate from the week before
00:23:30.780
that was deemed by the media to be nasty and so what what they try to do is they try to steer us
00:23:37.260
in a civil direction but even if a candidate was uncivil then you perhaps you should know that
00:23:43.100
um as you as you go into vote so it's regret actually a really good point so it's regretful
00:23:48.940
that uh we've heard so much from the moderator and less from the candidates uh you know agreed
00:23:54.540
and i i think from the viewer's standpoint what i saw a lot of the um sort of you know
00:24:01.500
um little personal tidbits interesting for sure but i think a lot of people would argue they
00:24:07.900
would have preferred to hear more on on the opinions of uh topics that are very near and
00:24:15.100
dear to a lot of canadians uh hearts and minds right now i i thought i did well i i thought our
00:24:20.620
campaign did well i enjoyed the debate um and uh despite the moderator and the rules and uh i think
00:24:29.100
uh again this is now a second debate that i've participated in the last two weeks and um our
00:24:34.860
campaign is is feeling very very positive about the way that uh they went and i'm glad that i'm
00:24:40.700
able to take my message directly to canadians instead of it being filtered well i would
00:24:46.220
definitely say that your stance on uh many topics actually i think uh i think are of interest to
00:24:55.900
specifically western Canadians and Albertans alike. Our own columnist Linda Slobodian spoke
00:25:02.700
with you and she called you the only actual conservative running as a candidate. What are
00:25:08.700
your thoughts on that statement? It's a kind thing of Linda to say and in fact I said this yesterday
00:25:14.860
during the debate. I said that we should not be afraid to communicate who we are and that's a key
00:25:20.620
to winning any election is that voters must perceive uh credibility and and that means being
00:25:27.020
genuine about our positions and and we can't be afraid and and run to the right during the
00:25:33.020
leadership and then pivot to the left during the general i have proposed that we should take some
00:25:38.620
bold stances on on a number of issues that conservatives have been afraid to take on
00:25:43.660
for instance as as you may know um i have uh proposed that i will abolish equalization
00:25:49.580
i i don't think that it makes sense that we continue this culture of dependency anymore
00:25:54.220
i'm not satisfied that the constitutional standard assuming that it is a firm standard even to begin
00:25:59.580
with is met whereby provinces are unable to maintain comparable level of services
00:26:04.940
uh and and if they're not then i would like to understand why not and perhaps empower them um
00:26:11.100
by way primarily of natural resources to be able to provide those services i'm glad that we're
00:26:16.220
talking about supply management. I'm glad that finally the party has come around and passports
00:26:21.580
and mandates are referred to as 21st century segregation. I think that a lot of Canadians
00:26:27.020
expect the Conservative Party to stand up for them, something that they failed to do for the
00:26:31.580
last two years. And by being firm and being who we are, I think will appeal to many more Canadians.
00:26:38.860
And speaking of some of those controversial areas where you've come out loud and clear,
00:26:45.260
is your stance on the mandate uh and of course that um you know leading to you being ousted from
00:26:51.580
the uh doug ford conservative government in ontario why is this such an important topic
00:26:58.300
to you this this idea of the of standing against the mandates and you have said very clearly that
00:27:04.060
if you are voted in you would work to um to have them all gone well i think to make a human being
00:27:15.180
choose between their ability to put food on the table and their personal health is inhumane we
00:27:22.060
have never forced anyone to do anything against their will and make someone choose between their
00:27:28.300
ability to feed their family is not much of a choice and for the record we all still agree
00:27:33.820
that it is a choice and surely the the science no longer backs that up we know that according
00:27:40.540
to most medical officers and even the manufacturer, two shots offer minimal protection against
00:27:46.120
infection. So any suggestion that someone's risk of transmission is higher because the rate of
00:27:52.960
infection is higher is now off the table. No one's putting anyone at risk. I always thought that it
00:27:58.860
was a very hateful proposition, one that we should oppose clearly. Instead of just thumping our chest
00:28:04.660
and yelling freedom, we can articulate a sensible and moderate position and convince a lot of
00:28:09.460
Canadians that are not sure about this, but just to, if I may, to clarify, I was not removed by Doug
00:28:15.940
Ford over my stance on the mandates. I was removed much earlier in January 2021 over my opposition
00:28:23.040
to the lockdowns. I published an open letter to the Premier, Premier Ford, whose government I
00:28:30.640
served in at the time, that we should factor in the toll of our public health response, namely the
00:28:37.580
lockdowns into um and the risk thereof into the total equation because it became very clear that
00:28:46.500
the mental health tour and in particular the health toll of the lockdowns was um very very
00:28:52.800
significant for instance ontario missed more than delayed or canceled more than 300 000 surgeries
00:28:59.300
uh we had more than a million cancer screenings missed we see the same picture throughout the
00:29:03.640
country. And so it's regretful that at the expense of, instead of focusing protection on vulnerable
00:29:10.420
population and congregate settings and building healthcare capacity, we'll log down 35 million
00:29:17.060
Canadians and potentially make them sick. Right. Well, thanks for clarifying that.
00:29:23.060
And speaking of, you know, you already brought up equalization and again, another polarizing
00:29:30.460
topic and and uh one that i think i wouldn't mind you touching on a little bit more i mean we're
00:29:36.700
you're saying that if you were elected um you would end all equalization payments in the
00:29:42.460
country by the end of your first term um now alberta so speaking to albertans in edmonton
00:29:49.180
on wednesday uh you know alberta is one of the provinces that transfers likely the most amount
00:29:56.620
across the country when it comes to equalization payments and a lot of that obviously comes from
00:30:03.260
the development of the oil and gas sector here which you know comparatively when you look at
00:30:08.780
say quebec who chooses not to um to develop their oil and gas uh and and then receive
00:30:17.180
the equalization payments sort of feels like this that that um you know it it creates that uh
00:30:23.980
as you referred to it, that dependency. Why don't you speak a little bit more to that
00:30:31.820
and how you see it being a priority to change and what you would propose?
00:30:41.500
Thank you. Well, first of all, to begin with, I believe that our natural resources are a blessing
00:30:46.940
and I'm not going to let oil and gas be canceled. Development of natural resources is not just
00:30:53.900
is good for our strategic interest and our economic bottom line i think it's good for the
00:30:59.660
planet because canadians can derive energy cleaner and safer than any other nation in the world but
00:31:09.580
to go back to equalization equalization in and of itself is basically redistribution
00:31:15.100
you take from one and you give to the other and many of your viewers might know that i was born
00:31:21.420
the soviet union and in in fact it's it's because of my place of origin that i'm so passionate
00:31:28.540
about canada's democracy and very very worried about its erosion which is probably the primary
00:31:34.940
reason why i'm in this race and and why i'd like to lead the conservative party in our country to
00:31:39.820
restore canada's democracy but comparable to that regime of redistribution is equalization payments
00:31:47.580
and i think it's not just unfair to canadians who pay into um equalization it also discourages
00:31:57.900
productivity uh research and development it discourages production and i don't think that
00:32:04.620
we should be holding canadians back i think that we should do the opposite one of the themes of my
00:32:09.820
campaign is to let people work and that means that we should not stand in the way of canadians
00:32:14.540
working but to encourage them to work and we i'm i'm heartened i'm happy to see that there are a
00:32:20.700
lot of voices that in fact receive equalization that are in favor of abolish it for instance
00:32:26.300
premier higgins in new brunswick a couple years ago he came out and said maybe instead of
00:32:31.580
equalization we should be developing our natural resources and that's precisely what i'm proposing
00:32:36.780
i think that there is no reason why canada should not be a natural resources superpower
00:32:43.260
and I'm very excited about charting that path by ending equalization.
00:32:53.100
So having said that, then your thoughts on the carbon tax. What's your stance on that and
00:33:00.780
do we do away with it? Do we reform it? What does that look like for you?
00:33:04.300
I will repeal the carbon tax on day one. Canada is responsible for 1.5% of all global emissions.
00:33:11.900
Even if we were to cut all of them, there is no clear evidence that that would make any
00:33:18.960
All that the carbon tax does is make life more expensive.
00:33:23.440
And I don't believe, with respect to all of my friends, that taxing Sally 10 bucks at
00:33:29.980
the gas pump and on everything she buys at the store will somehow change the climate.
00:33:35.640
And so I would propose that we do away with it completely and we do not hinder Canadian
00:33:45.300
And at the same time, cost of living is something that is very, very important to many Canadians
00:33:53.540
Produce has tripled in the last couple of years, meat is up, everything is so, so expensive.
00:33:58.540
I'd like to find ways to make life more affordable for Canadians.
00:34:02.540
So does that then, you know, and I was actually just going to ask you that, how we can as
00:34:08.140
a country try to find these ways to make life more affordable, soaring inflation, you know,
00:34:15.040
housing crisis because of the cost of housing, you know, with the carbon tax, but what more?
00:34:23.780
So for instance, with the money that I intend to save from equalization, I propose an income
00:34:30.580
equalization was about 21 billion dollars uh that would be a material tax cut across the
00:34:35.940
board for all canadians um i would also propose that the best thing we can do to stop runaway
00:34:42.980
inflation other than stop the printing of money we have accumulated half a trillion worth of debt
00:34:49.540
in the last two years with nothing to show for we didn't build a single hospital we didn't hire a
00:34:53.940
single nurse um it's it's very regretful but beyond that we have to appreciate that we have a
00:35:03.380
a major supply chain disruption by virtue of the lockdowns something that no candidate in this race
00:35:09.940
other than myself has been willing to point out we stopped the global supply chain at its tracks
00:35:14.980
a couple of times got demand going a couple of times and our market is in a disequilibrium
00:35:19.140
And so providing some certainty to the market that we're not shutting down again will immediately
00:35:25.060
go a long way to restoring this equilibrium and the printing of money, repeal the carbon tax,
00:35:33.140
give folks an income tax cut, and perhaps we should revisit the way government does business.
00:35:40.260
I'm going to propose the capping of spending, discretionary spending to the rate of inflation.
00:35:46.020
So would you say that that is the most pressing issue for Canadians right now,
00:35:51.700
or what stands out to you as the most important issue right now?
00:35:57.380
I think that the most important issue and the greatest threat to Canada right now is the
00:36:00.820
erosion of Canada's democracy. And I believe that it's very, very real. We have a law making its way
00:36:08.900
through Parliament looking to censor speech. We have a good percentage of Canadians, 15 to 20
00:36:16.980
percent of Canadians, that are treated like second-class citizens and are unable to participate
00:36:23.220
fully in society, travel freely, enter and exit Canada freely, or potentially many of them have
00:36:31.140
already or are afraid to lose their jobs. We have a federal government that invokes the successor
00:36:37.860
of the war measures act the emergencies act when it nowhere nearly meets the letter of the law
00:36:44.820
um seizing of bank accounts without a court order this is an unprecedented assault on canada's
00:36:51.300
democracy and money without democracy we don't have anything you can't have a strong economy
00:36:56.820
you can't have certainty of property you can't have investor confidence to develop our natural
00:37:01.300
resources without certainty in our democracy and i as i said to you i was born in a communist regime
00:37:11.380
That is my first priority is to defend, restore Canada's democracy.
00:37:16.820
Now, I know that you are, as I mentioned, you have your position on many things is
00:37:23.700
What do you say to the Albertans in this growing movement of separation?
00:37:33.300
and um i've had a number of these conversations with my friends in alberta over the last couple
00:37:39.560
of days and i understand that there's this desire to potentially for more independence
00:37:47.220
but i'm i'm going to do a couple of things first of all i'm going to fully um unleash
00:37:54.300
your economic potential by by working with you at allowing further ways to develop your natural
00:38:00.060
resources i will repeal the anti-pipeline bill on day one makes sense it's so much safer to transpond
00:38:09.500
oil by pipe than than train i would think that anyone that cares about the environment would
00:38:16.700
prefer a pipeline over a train i'm going to repeal equalization and most importantly
00:38:24.220
i'm a politician from ontario and i know how many of them think and how folks in quebec think
00:38:30.060
I think that the political class needs to appreciate that there is life outside of Ontario and Quebec, and I need to bring you into the national conversation.
00:38:41.860
And I start doing that by bringing Conservative members from Western Canada and the Maritimes and Atlantic Canada into the conversation.
00:38:51.640
I hope to do everything possible to maintain unity within our party and our country.
00:38:56.660
And pollsters do say that for you to win, it would feel like a long shot.
00:39:04.660
What are your thoughts on that? If you aren't successful, what are your plans there?
00:39:10.660
What do you have to say to the people who say it's a long shot for you?
00:39:16.660
First, there was some question as to whether my application would be approved,
00:39:20.660
given that I was asked to leave a provincial caucus. We got approved.
00:39:25.100
Then there was a question as to whether I'll be able to make it onto the ballot
00:39:28.060
by raising the $300,000 plus the $60,000 tax on top of the fee.
00:39:35.760
We raised the money, and now I'm on the final ballot.
00:39:42.200
and by all accounts, I've done really well in the debates,
00:39:45.120
and more and more voters are seeing that there's another credible option here.
00:39:49.900
And finally, I anticipate that we're going to, in addition to exceeding expectations, I'm looking to unite democracy-loving Canadians, and that includes the freedom movement, that is not entirely settled as to where it's going to go, but we have made a lot of headway with freedom.
00:40:10.560
And I'm confident this is going to propel us to a good result on first ballot, which
00:40:16.720
may translate into the climbing up as we continue along the ballots. So we love exceeding expectations
00:40:24.240
and we love to be considered the underdog as well. So rising to the occasion. And if you are not
00:40:31.680
successful, will you consider running for the Conservative Party on the federal level?
00:40:37.440
you know what would be your plans moving forward I'm not sure yeah you know a lot of thought that
00:40:44.160
I haven't thought that through okay I like to joke and it's true Melanie I I don't really love
00:40:48.740
I don't really like politics and I've enjoyed I was very very blessed in private practice practicing
00:40:55.620
law before I was elected I practiced for 12 years it's it's better for you know for the paycheck
00:41:02.100
It's better for your privacy and certainly my loved ones.
00:41:06.440
Politics is very, very taxing, especially the last couple of years and everything that I've been blessed to experience.
00:41:17.200
I am committed to being competitive in this race and we're in it to win it.
00:41:32.100
for the day. Then we may stop in Red Deer on our way back to Edmonton. I have an event
00:41:40.580
scheduled in Edmonton. We're going to meet some folks there as well tomorrow and probably
00:41:49.240
Well, thank you for filling us in a little bit more in depth than people were able to
00:41:55.280
hear at the debate on Wednesday. Again, Conservative Party of Canada candidate Roman Bavard joining
00:42:01.980
us in studio today thanks for watching thank you so much yeah that was uh roman babber in studio
00:42:13.180
with with melanie risden with the western standard i appreciate her stepping in for me when i had to
00:42:18.220
step out there yesterday as far as candidates go you know mr babber i i found he he stood out he
00:42:25.980
he's uh as melanie kind of implied towards the end a little tough but you know he's a bit of a long
00:42:30.380
shot and he remains so but i think he's taken a lot more seriously now than he was even when he
00:42:35.360
was first kicking the tires for running for the leadership coming from the ontario legislature
00:42:40.100
he's not known too terribly much outside of there but i think during the debates people have seen
00:42:44.500
that this is a guy who's rational he's he's uh calm he's got answers he's got ideas and a lot of
00:42:52.640
what uh melanie asked at the end which is a tough question saying you know if you don't win what are
00:42:57.760
you going to do? Because people do wonder about that. But I hope he sticks around because they
00:43:03.100
need good, solid minds and caucus no matter who wins it. You know, that's part of the problem
00:43:07.560
you get in these races. They get so vitriolic or they insist on, you know, the person who wants to
1.00
00:43:13.140
be in the lead and can't seem to live with not being in the lead, you know, or not running the
00:43:20.320
party. You lose some good people that way. And if they can swallow their pride a bit and hang in
00:43:25.120
there they could still be very productive and hey uh babber as you can see as a young man
00:43:29.000
he could be running for the leadership uh down the road whenever the next conservative leader
00:43:33.160
is finished too and again i don't want to rule him out who knows the race is young and he could
00:43:37.660
continue to gain steam so he's going to be doing apparently an event in red deer or edmonton today
00:43:41.940
and he's covering ground and making the rounds there i mean another thing with him and uh people
00:43:49.320
I've worked with the people I know, there are no, you know, few better advocates for freedoms
00:43:55.660
and, you know, small government and getting government out of your hair than people who
00:44:01.520
grew up and were born in the Eastern Bloc in Eastern Europe back when it was still communist
00:44:06.180
and socialist state out there. They've seen firsthand just how bad it can be, how bad it
0.82
00:44:11.180
can get, and they see the warning signs. And that's why very often we get some very strong
00:44:15.380
conservative politicians and activists who had immigrated to Canada from Eastern Europe back
00:44:22.040
when those times were that bad. So yeah, that was Roman Babber. And I'm going to be speaking with
00:44:27.000
Scott Aitchison soon too, and I'll be interviewing him. And that will be the last of like, that will
00:44:31.760
mean I've interviewed all six of the candidates. Roman had spoken to me about a month ago as well
00:44:37.040
on the show. And we're going to keep covering that race as it develops. It's a long one. We're
00:44:41.800
going all the way till September 10th there. Getting onto the federal front going further.
00:44:47.380
So this is something, yeah, I think Dave mentioned it. The NDP and liberals, some MPs are calling or
00:44:53.460
wondering if measures are needed to stop political protests. This is a bad road we're going down,
00:44:58.700
guys. So I guess there was a couple incidents where there was a lot of swearing loud, I'll say
00:45:03.800
rude people. I mean, I don't think protesters do themselves any favors when they surround a
00:45:10.200
politician's car and go all haywire and screaming like a bunch of lunatics. But they have the right
00:45:15.240
to do it. If they're not getting physical, they're not putting the person at real risk or things like
00:45:20.620
that. I mean, let's work on changing the atmosphere and the environment as to why people feel driven
00:45:26.000
to such extremes when they protest. And it's certainly, these days, I guess you could say
00:45:30.680
it's kind of conservatives who are doing that protest, but the left, hey, there was no shortage
00:45:34.220
of them and their screaming protests in the past as well or currently. So going down the road,
00:45:39.680
though, do we really want, I mean, look what we did to the right of protest this year already last
00:45:44.540
winter. And these lefties who are calling for more controls on it don't seem to understand.
00:45:49.580
This is going to turn against you. You know, when you infringe upon the rights of others,
00:45:54.340
eventually that gets turned on you. You won't always have a liberal NDP coalition in Ottawa.
00:46:00.180
It's going to feel like it's there forever. Oh, I assure you that, but it won't be. And you start
00:46:04.820
putting in changes like this, another government down the road is going to use that to turn it
00:46:09.900
against you. And at least the right of protest, assembly, expression, speech, these are essential
00:46:17.420
base rights, and we can't let them be eroded just because some people have been unfortunately
00:46:22.440
abusive with it. I don't think Singh and some of his supporters really understand what they're
00:46:27.700
asking for. You know, look at how badly, I mean, look at how many good things came about from free
00:46:33.140
expression and protests. And some of those protests got out of control. I mean, you know,
00:46:37.560
the civil rights movement in the United States, that was from the outside, you know, fighting
00:46:42.280
to end the racial segregation and then to allow, you know, schools to have mixed children within
00:46:49.300
them, things like that. Those protests often broke local laws at that time. Those protests
00:46:55.500
got out of control. Sometimes those protests got a bit violent. Sometimes there were small riots,
00:46:59.580
but it led to a good end and there was no other way for people to express themselves at that time
00:47:05.720
they couldn't just go to the ballot box and reverse those Jim Crow laws so we can't underestimate
00:47:12.880
how important it is even if you don't like the message of some of the protesters sometimes the
00:47:16.840
protesters are kooky sometimes they are out of control sometimes they're going too far you have
00:47:22.380
to accept that because it's just too risky to start cracking down and start to try and cherry
00:47:29.120
pick which are legitimate protests, which aren't, and start infringing on those rights that are so
00:47:33.920
very important. So, I mean, if I do have any message to put out to people as well, I mean,
00:47:39.860
it's not just with these progressives foolishly calling for more infringement on the individual's
00:47:45.000
rights of expression and protest, but also I would for the people who think that going out
00:47:49.760
and going haywire and swearing at and surrounding politicians' cars as they did with Singh and
00:47:55.460
doing that, you're not doing anybody any favors either, guys. I mean, I'm no friend of Jagmeet
00:48:00.400
Singh or his ideology, but that sort of approach and demonstration is not earning you any respect
00:48:08.860
or support from common Canadians where we want to actually make some change. And as well, it is
00:48:13.460
empowering the reactions of politicians like this when they're talking about imposing more laws to
00:48:19.780
try and crack down on future protests. So, you know, cut it out, guys. You can be expressive
00:48:26.540
and you can be excited and you can be a little rude. You can be a little tasteless. But when
00:48:30.280
you push it too far, you give them what they feel to be the justification to infringe further
00:48:35.580
on your rights. And it's not going to be a good outcome for any of us. So interesting times,
00:48:40.960
though. Interesting times. And again, where was I going with things? I don't know. I lose track
00:48:48.500
sometimes. These live shows are fun. Okay. So I've got the guest of the lobby. I'm going to speak to
00:48:52.240
our advertiser one more time before I bring Mr. Tucker in. Cause actually the last thing I spoke
00:48:56.460
on, I think kind of segues in cause we're talking about discussion. We're talking about discussion
00:48:59.800
on things that make people squeamish. You might not want to discuss it. And there are areas where
00:49:03.680
some people feel that the expression and different points of view shouldn't even be allowed to be
00:49:07.740
discussed. So that kind of ties in. In the meantime as well, with my opening rant, I talked about how
00:49:12.720
we have the gun registry returning through a backdoor means. And it is threatening your right,
00:49:19.260
your ability to own and responsibly use firearms. And if you enjoy firearms, if you're looking to
00:49:25.880
enjoy firearms, purchase them, use them, you got to be a member of the Canadian Shooting Sports
00:49:30.400
Association. It's an association as with any other interest. I mean, they offer all sorts of
00:49:34.980
resources, videos on safe, responsible firearm use, directions towards events, whether it's
00:49:41.100
a target shooting or a biathlon, things like that. They have all kinds of resources in there. It's a
00:49:46.100
nice deep site that way. Where are there trade shows going on? And of course, lots of news on
00:49:51.160
firearm news, things that are happening and things that are legislatively happening.
00:49:56.640
And they lobby on your behalf. They're out there. I'm sure that Mr. Bernardo has some very serious
00:50:02.560
plans to push back against this, this backdoor gun registry right now. They need your help though,
00:50:07.240
to make sure that they're standing up for you. And that means you got to take out a membership
00:50:10.400
with them. Guys, if you own a firearm, you should have a membership. It's just nothing but good
00:50:13.880
resources for you all around, and it helps them help you. So check them out, Canadian Shooting
00:50:18.800
Sports Association. Their website is cssa-cila.org. And check them out. You'll see it's worth taking
00:50:25.740
out a membership. Okay, let's bring in Mr. Trevor Tucker. He wrote a column for us recently there,
00:50:31.540
and there are going to be more coming. And we went into whether or not conversation is imperative
00:50:37.200
I'm going to say it right out on abortion. I even, I got to admit, I dodged that word. I just,
00:50:42.560
if I could avoid that issue, I try and, but we can't just take our heads in the sand and forget
00:50:47.200
everything. So thank you very much for writing about this and coming on to talk to me today,
00:50:51.060
Trevor. Yeah. Pleasure, Corey. Good to meet up with you. Yeah. So just, I guess maybe I'll kind
00:50:57.620
of get you to just summarize and you know, part of it ties in with your personal views and also
00:51:02.440
you're something of a communication specialist and you're talking about the importance of
00:51:06.460
communication, I guess, in a sense, and on this particular issue and the ability for it. Can
00:51:11.060
you kind of summarize what your column was about? Yeah. So the last one was just basically about
00:51:18.340
the importance of us learning how to talk again. You know, it seems I grew up in, I guess we're
00:51:27.360
all saying this these days, a very different kind of Canada. One that seemed a lot grittier and a
00:51:39.400
at least as far as the public conversation went.
00:51:47.120
and I'm sure we could talk about a whole bunch of others,
00:51:51.040
it seems like there's one narrative that's allowed
00:52:02.640
um you know i i teach in university and and uh um man you know the the amount of kind of
00:52:11.440
trigger warnings and and so on that you have to give on on any sort of difficult or uncomfortable
00:52:17.600
topic um at least on one side of the spectrum you know um uh i'm i'm christian uh and and
00:52:26.880
right even when i say that i'm kind of like yikes right because because you're used to
00:52:32.080
to having to um sort of give give trigger warnings for one side and not so much the other but um
00:52:39.200
and anyway you know on the the sort of conversation imperative you know arguably
00:52:46.160
in the public sphere we're only as our democracy is only as healthy as our conversation is and um
00:52:52.640
you know lots of people have said this i quoted jordan habermas um but uh uh you know and when
00:53:00.480
we lose that ability to have a dialogue, and when the dialogue is especially co-opted by
00:53:08.240
people with political, with economic agendas, what have you, you know, guys like Habermas
00:53:19.500
So rather than trying to dive into the abortion debate, I was trying to hit it at a bit of
00:53:27.460
different angle just to say this should be on our minds um whatever side we're on and talk about it
00:53:34.180
and equally concerning to the issue is the fact that we can't talk about it so maybe we should
00:53:40.900
try going there first well that's just it and and i mean it's it's you know as opposed to the issue
00:53:46.260
itself i mean that's a fodder for a whole other shows with people but the the ability to communicate
00:53:51.780
on it and differ on it but still respect the other person's right to do it i i'm very libertarian i
00:54:07.920
to argue against that, to be able to say comfortably,
00:54:26.060
lot of people don't just don't even want to talk about it but it will extend to other issues and
00:54:30.860
we can never say that the case is closed we can't yeah yeah and you know and i i'm with you and i
00:54:37.100
voiced this at the top of the column that you know i'm i i have pretty strong beliefs uh about
00:54:44.460
abortion and um you know that for me ultimately there's there's not a lot of wiggle room but i as
00:54:52.860
as a person of faith and with knowing many people of faith,
00:55:12.260
I also think it's wrong for me to force someone
00:55:18.320
Ultimately, that puts me largely in a pacifist camp too,
00:55:35.680
and I'm gonna write about this some more hopefully coming up,
00:55:49.840
not all this other stuff that you have questions about um you know like is it is it abortion at
00:55:55.520
one month is it abortion at like one week prior to birth right like if you're on one side or the
00:56:00.960
other you almost can't even go there um and and i think we probably could find a lot of commonality
00:56:07.360
if we could actually go there right if we could actually ask ask the questions that
00:56:14.000
that get sort of pushed aside in the effort of of streamlining the um the narrative yeah well and
00:56:21.920
i mean there's a mental attitude and i think it's gotten worse you know with social media
00:56:27.440
and divided discourse and very polarized this and this and it's i'm right you're wrong you're
00:56:32.480
right i'm wrong and we've forgotten that that basic idea of i can very strenuously disagree
00:56:41.200
with you but fully support your right to be wrong and we've lost that we're you're wrong thus you
00:56:48.160
shouldn't even be able to say that and that's a big problem and that's happening a lot and it's
00:56:52.480
not a left right thing it happens with people when they get too heated up on either side of an issue
00:56:57.120
they try to shut up the other side rather than uh debate them and it's it's getting worse
00:57:03.360
yeah yeah absolutely and and if you know i teach communications and i and i can't help but thinking
00:57:09.920
that that that those who you know want to control the airwaves um are are are the leaders of this
00:57:17.360
kind of this kind of assault upon you know nuance and complexity and and um you know the more common
00:57:24.320
sense questions that that bug all of us yeah so did uh the the march for life event was uh you
00:57:32.000
know it's an annual one it's a big one uh did you attend that in ottawa this year yeah i did i did um
00:57:39.680
and you know that that was that that was a really interesting um i mean how do you
00:57:46.320
encapsulate it it was a really interesting case in point where you know it it it seemed like um
00:57:53.680
there was one side that uh this is the planned parenthood side that was very um
00:58:02.640
it was very clear uh you know the points they were making they were trying to shout down
00:58:06.800
the speakers my body my choice and and it was it was it was definitely much more angry than than
00:58:16.400
some of the leading media outlets would have you believe you know and then on the other hand you
00:58:23.180
have people that are you know quite eclectic I was actually like every age every size largely Catholic
00:58:43.320
Yeah, you know, that side, it just didn't seem as angry, I guess.
00:58:54.520
I mean, avoiding the anger, and the extremes can come from either side.
00:58:58.100
You know, there's a lot of attacks personally or even physically
00:59:01.580
at some of the protests from counter protesters at the same time that there's been some crazed
00:59:06.080
extreme anti-abortion activists who've you know shot doctors in past years and things like that
00:59:10.860
but those are the outliers you know if we could stick to the the middle with most people uh i mean
00:59:17.600
the issue is clearly never going to be settled but that also means then we're going to have to
00:59:22.040
keep an ongoing discourse moving on it yeah i think so um and and you know that there were
00:59:30.620
there were signs of that yesterday. You know, there were people who would try to walk up to
00:59:38.960
the sort of counter protest and, you know, engage and that sort of thing. There was a lot of talk
00:59:46.340
of people recognizing the motives. This one woman, it was very interesting, you know,
00:59:55.520
She had had abortion 25 years ago and she had felt guilty about it and so on.
01:00:01.520
But, you know, in her in her statement, she was she's like pointed over and she said, you know, pro-choice people do this out of love, too.
01:00:12.760
And love for freedom, love for their own bodies and and actually love for children.
01:00:18.880
And I actually was kind of looking around wondering, you know, how that would fly.
01:00:23.200
but you know it seemed fine here was a woman who had who had lived lived the
01:00:29.980
issue in a way and and I you know that kind of you know olive branch reaching
01:00:37.580
even if you know I mean even if it's tough and even if you're gonna make your
01:00:43.100
own peers raise an eyebrow I think it's still it's still great for the
01:00:50.000
conversation. We all do these things because we think we're doing good and right and could
01:00:57.820
recognize that kind of stuff. Well, and as I was saying earlier, the right to protest, the right
01:01:03.560
to express, whether it's this or anything else, it's always under threat. There's people saying
01:01:06.860
we've got to crack down on it. We've got to understand, particularly progressives. I mean,
01:01:11.540
a lot of advancements from progressive causes came, they started from unpopular protests.
01:01:16.160
they were the ones on the streets they were the ones protesting against the vietnam war they were
01:01:20.320
the ones protesting for civil rights for minorities in the united states and getting cracked down on
01:01:24.480
by the state don't you know we've got to remember that you've still got to allow views that you feel
01:01:30.160
are unpopular to get out and express themselves as well and i think that's getting forgotten by a lot
01:01:34.080
of people maybe i'll ask you i mean apart from media all the time but where do you think that's
01:01:40.160
coming from that that push to shut down legal protests uh i think it's coming from people
01:01:49.760
this is just pure theory on my part and it goes through the media it goes but it's really stemming
01:01:54.000
at the government's level of uh such an ideological confidence that you are right that you're
01:01:59.760
absolutely right and that the ends justify the means they even know that they're doing something
01:02:04.880
wrong, but they feel it's so important to get their cause through, get their goals accomplished,
01:02:12.820
that it's a secondary thing to step on the right of free expression because in the longer run,
01:02:18.780
it will be better for everybody. I think it's a delusional point of view, but I do think,
01:02:22.600
and maybe it's an unconscious point of view with some of them, but that's my theory as to why we're
01:02:27.240
seeing such a push. This particular liberal government is more ideologically driven, I think,
01:02:35.420
And when you're driven by ideology rather than fact,
01:02:39.080
then you start to do things such as set aside rights
01:02:46.260
Any mediator will tell you, and I said this in my column,
01:02:54.880
if you come in on your moral high horse, you're cooked.
01:02:57.480
um it's it's not until you you recognize that you know whether the person across from you is
01:03:04.880
is is a parent whether in this case the person across from you is Canadian and you know my
01:03:09.860
family's lived here for 200 years like I have something invested in this but so do you and
01:03:18.000
yeah and the threats come from a lot of directions again I still think it stems from the government but
01:03:27.200
You mentioned media and we've got a problem going on there,
01:03:29.980
but we've got a government that's very intent on making the media beholden to
01:03:33.960
the government. And it's through internet controls, it's through subsidies,
01:03:37.540
it's through a number of levels and media outlets, again,
01:03:39.940
whether unconsciously or even consciously, they might say,
01:03:42.200
I'm not going to cover that because we just don't want to shake the tree where
01:03:46.140
or we don't want to run that column because it's just going where we know it's
01:03:49.940
going to upset the people who determine whether we're official media or not,
01:03:56.160
And we're going to cut off that discourse over there because it's
01:04:00.480
inappropriate. And I think a lot of principal media members,
01:04:05.160
even if they're progressive ones would like to see open debate,
01:04:22.380
apart from, apart, maybe from all of us, uh, there, there's an interesting independent
01:04:27.480
media landscape in Canada and, and, um, you know, apart from all of us just kind of voting
01:04:33.480
with our feet, um, you know, it's, it's, it's going to be a difficult one to fix this issue.
01:04:39.300
Yeah. Well, we're, we're growing and we're trying, we're getting it out there. And that's
01:04:42.120
why I appreciate, you know, you're coming on talking to me today and the column you wrote
01:04:45.000
and, and you said you have another one coming up pretty soon.
01:04:47.460
Yeah, yeah. I mean, I wrote on yesterday, largely because, you know, it was a different
01:04:57.180
view from where I sat. I still did a little narrative thing. It was a very interesting
01:05:04.400
day. And again, I'm not a Catholic. And, you know, when you see young people quietly, very,
01:05:12.420
you know, quietly and solemnly voicing their concerns.
01:05:25.460
And actually it just brought me to another thought
01:05:26.940
and an anecdote, but getting back into the mid to late nineties.
01:05:32.900
particularly with people in the LGBTQ community.
1.00
01:05:36.080
And I had a girlfriend at the time who actually took me out
01:05:40.540
And they were pretty small back in those days.
0.98
01:05:46.360
I mean, this was an event of free expression with me getting around people outside of my regular comfort zone, getting to know people.
01:05:56.360
And if they'd not, you know, and again, speaking of that, you know, 30 years before that, they would have been arrested for holding a pride parade.
01:06:02.900
Were it not for events like that, people like me wouldn't have been able to interact and broaden my thought.
0.55
01:06:08.460
So when we shut down things like March for Life and that, again, we're not having anything productive.
01:06:12.220
this is not going to help. Yeah, I agree. I agree. And I love that you mentioned that the personal
01:06:18.840
side of it, you know, the same thing with the LGBT stuff, you know, it wasn't until I had friends
01:06:25.620
that were wrestling profoundly with this. These are my best friends. And you don't have a choice
01:06:35.040
to sort of slough it off as a political issue or, you know, and when you have that personal,
01:06:40.820
to me, that's where it's at. And we can't let anyone get into that space between us. I often
01:06:47.580
say to my students that conversation is all we have. And so we need to fight to keep that ground.
01:06:55.260
Yeah, absolutely. Well, again, I appreciate you coming in. I'm looking forward to your column on
01:06:59.700
what you observed at the event the other day and other columns to come in the future.
01:07:04.760
All we can do is keep working on it. And again, well, we're not backing down over here. So
01:07:09.900
thanks again for coming on to talk to me today, Trevor. And I hope we get to talk like this again
01:07:13.680
soon. Absolutely. Yeah. Good seeing you, Corey. Great. Thanks. So yeah, guys, just the summary,
01:07:22.560
you know, get to Western Standard online or well, it's not online anymore. Westernstandard.news
01:07:28.400
and Trevor Tucker, you can look that up, that column. And as he, as he mentioned,
01:07:31.660
there's going to be another one coming soon. And yeah, you know, we've got to keep the discussions
01:07:38.320
going. It's just really, really important. And trying to shut down debate just isn't the way to
01:07:43.660
go. You know, there's a movie, I'm going to, you know, go to an anecdote, if anybody's ever seen
01:07:49.500
it before. It was back in the 90s. It was Laura Dern and I'm forgetting the other names. It wasn't
01:07:57.680
a lot of top name action. Well, Burt Reynolds was in it as well. It was called Citizen Ruth.
01:08:02.100
And it was almost a parody on the American abortion debate back in those times, kind of an
01:08:07.640
obscure movie that came out. And it's focused around, you know, a character named Ruth who
01:08:12.960
had found herself pregnant. She'd been pregnant a number of times. She was an irresponsible young
01:08:16.680
lady addicted to sniffing glue and a number of things. But she got into kind of the middle of a
01:08:22.200
battle between pro-choice and pro-life activists and turned into the symbol of it. And of course,
01:08:29.640
some of it probably wasn't terribly exaggerated, but it kind of exaggerated the extents of both
01:08:34.640
sides and their hysteria to try and make her choose one way or the other. And I thought it
01:08:39.520
was a very good movie in the sense that it showed the extremes on both sides are just way out to
01:08:44.620
launch on this whole thing and don't do any favors. And I love seeing serious issues brought
01:08:50.060
out in a sense of parody or entertainment or kind of dark comedy, I guess you could say. If you get
01:08:54.880
a chance, I don't know where you would find it now, streaming in some corner somewhere
01:09:09.880
I don't know if that movie would be made today,
01:09:11.660
because people are afraid of opening the subject
01:09:21.020
to discuss these things that make people think?
01:09:32.060
I always have, and I have been when it comes to vaccination.
01:09:34.320
I'm still on that level when it comes to the abortion issue.
01:09:38.000
You know, I'm going to share another anecdote, but it's going way back when I was young.
01:09:41.160
Yeah, I was 19, and my girlfriend at the time was pregnant.
01:09:51.020
I mean, whether people feel there should be options or not, there were options.
01:09:53.740
So we sat down, we went to the clinic in Calgary, the family planning or whatever, just to get the options.
01:10:02.720
And the counselor who chatted with us, I still remember to tell you, it did put me off back then too.
01:10:11.800
It was, this is where you go to get an abortion, this is how you do it.
0.94
01:10:14.560
This is where you go to get an abortion, this is how you do it.
01:10:16.440
Like, wait, we really weren't sure what we wanted to do.
01:10:19.600
We wanted to hear about what about adoption or what are the supports if we keep the baby, where are we at?
01:10:25.460
But no, this is where you go to get an abortion.
0.99
01:10:31.760
By the way, in the end, we chose to keep the baby, and that was my son, Lane, and, you know, he's still alive today.
01:10:39.140
But again, if they're going to offer a choice, make it a choice.
01:10:43.880
And in our circumstance, I'm certain in other clinics, I mean, that's just one anecdote.
01:10:47.120
but when they're run by activists or people that are sometimes way over on one side,
01:10:52.160
They're really pushing towards a direction that they prefer,
01:11:00.400
but we've got to make sure to jealously guard that territory for it.
01:11:04.140
All right, I'm going to talk about a sponsor one more time
01:11:09.000
I was talking a little bit about them before, of course,
01:11:12.800
and I'll talk about some of the things they offer
01:11:37.680
But you see, there's all sorts of creative ways
01:11:44.560
to get into those savings plans, as we can see there, or even paying your utility bills,
01:11:49.280
paying your credit cards, depositing into ATMs. Bitcoin Well has all of these services for you.
01:11:55.540
And they have what's called Bitcoin Academy that's on there. Lots of seminars, lots of videos,
01:12:02.760
because that's what a lot of the uncertainty is. You don't fully understand it. It's different.
01:12:06.080
What is financial sovereignty? How do you get your stuff away from central banks? Things such
01:12:12.380
is that. These guys are there to help show you what it's about. Bitcoin for beginners, as you
01:12:16.380
can see, most of us are beginners with this thing. So check them out, bitcoinwell.com.
01:12:21.980
They offer a good service. If you're looking into getting into digital currencies, they are the guys
01:12:26.220
to talk to, guys. Check out bitcoinwell.com and take control of your money. So let's see what
01:12:33.420
else we got going on here. Okay, so let's, here's speaking of ethics. This is a story that's come
01:12:39.420
Some members of parliament are seeking tougher penalties for ethics violations.
01:12:45.240
You know, and there's lots of room to impose a lot of those things.
01:12:48.720
The maximum penalty right now, think about that.
01:12:53.680
For an ethics violation, and that can range into a whole lot of things, is $500 fine and maybe a public apology.
01:13:04.040
These are people who, you know, they got some very healthy six-figure salaries, some massive
01:13:10.040
pensions. I mean, they're not the richest people on earth, and I don't think they should be paid
01:13:12.880
minimum wage. But throwing a $500 fine at them for an ethics violation probably isn't that much
01:13:19.580
of a disincentive for them. I don't think they're going to cry themselves to sleep if $500 has been
01:13:27.660
imposed upon them for breaking the rules. And you see, ethics, particularly with public office
01:13:32.280
holders. These are people that control our lives. These are people that have access. They take,
01:13:38.100
they're entrusted with our money, with our funds, with our taxes, and they theoretically are going
01:13:43.640
to utilize them for the public benefit. If they're not doing that correctly, if they're breaking,
01:13:47.840
again, ethical rules and things, there should be some very serious penalties for it.
01:13:51.840
But right now it's 500 bucks. I mean, we got some serious problems here, guys. This shouldn't even
01:13:57.760
me a discussion. The Conservative Party last August recommended a maximum of $50,000.
01:14:03.420
Even then, I don't know, but I mean, that's certainly better than $500. It makes some people
01:14:07.100
think twice, right? Like that's, I can't afford a $50,000 hit out of the blue, that's for sure.
01:14:11.500
And it says, you know, of course, proportionate to the severity of the offense and the offender's
01:14:14.400
history. But the other part was, and their personal net worth. Well, I don't know about that.
01:14:18.480
I don't want to get into that socialism. Hey, this is the penalty, this is the penalty,
01:14:21.300
whether you've got a thousand in the bank or a hundred thousand, just don't do it.
01:14:23.840
But maybe if you don't have the money in the bank to cover your fines, and again, that's where we get to the disincentive aspect, it might prevent some of them from doing it.
01:14:33.440
Unethical people, you know, often they're kind of sociopaths in a way and they don't really care about consequences, so it doesn't really matter.
01:14:40.560
But, I mean, $500 for an ethics, and that's the maximum for a member of parliament for an ethics breach as a fine, that is a sad joke.
01:14:48.060
I mean, come on, a bad speeding ticket can run up near that level these days.
01:14:51.260
um and yeah dave talked about this before so the debates chief admitted failure
01:14:56.820
uh this david johnson i didn't even know we had a debates chief uh so in the 2021 election this
01:15:02.480
was the guy i guess who manages the whole thing and so there was a widespread agreement that the
01:15:06.420
debates didn't deliver as well as they thought and there were two uh major weaknesses identified
01:15:11.800
and that was format and moderation um and he's asking the questions were they were they organized
01:15:23.520
Oh, you know, we shouldn't have to have in the first place.
01:15:27.020
There was the commission got censored by a judge last fall
01:15:31.540
Yeah, they kept certain media members from trying to cover it or tried.
01:15:36.720
The format and so on as well when it came to Maxime Bernier.
01:15:43.540
but they didn't feel he should take part in the debates.
01:15:49.420
But then part of the problem is you throw the debates
01:15:53.840
out of the hands of the government and into others.
01:16:03.020
The federal ones that right now that are being reviewed
01:16:06.620
So I guess there's something to remind people like me
01:16:08.440
who keep saying government does everything worse.
01:16:10.760
Well, they can still be outdone by other collections,
01:16:13.760
committees, and groups of people outside of government
01:16:15.220
at times. And somehow they managed to pull that off with the Edmonton debates. So just getting
01:16:19.820
the government's hands out of debates doesn't mean they're going to be good ones. That is a good
01:16:23.400
start. I hope the conservatives are doing some soul searching and trying to figure out what the
01:16:27.000
hell happened there on Wednesday, because that was just an abomination. Let's see, we employers,
01:16:33.080
again, we get the, you know, this employment crisis, and they're talking, testimony saying
01:16:37.820
we need more immigration to fill that. I mean, because of the pandemic, we've actually cut back
01:16:42.920
on a lot of immigration. A lot of people came in, not surprisingly. We got a lot of people not going
1.00
01:16:47.780
back to work. We had a lot of people retiring. Canadian-born people are less inclined to have
01:16:52.820
more than one and a half kids, so we're not increasing our population naturally.
01:16:57.280
So there's a lot of discussion talking about, though, you know, immigration being critical to
01:17:00.580
the well-being of communities, and most economists will agree on that. I think where a lot of the
01:17:05.960
discussion is, is how many and how do we integrate it effectively? You know, I mean, just taking
01:17:11.460
people and dumping them blindly into communities and areas is not wise. It's not good for the
01:17:16.380
people immigrating and it's not good for the people in the communities. So, you know, do it
1.00
01:17:20.480
with thought, do it carefully. But we're having some of that discussion because right now we have
01:17:24.920
a labor crisis and we have a lot of people around the world who would love to come out and fill
01:17:29.120
that void right now. And we're too busy staring at our shoes and messing around to figure out how
01:17:33.920
to deal with it. So hopefully something productive comes out of that discussion there. Let's see
01:17:40.000
discussions in Finance Canada. They're defending, I guess they gave a $10 billion loan guarantee for
01:17:44.580
the Trans Mountain to help the company get the darn thing done. Of course, the far left is calling
01:17:49.920
it a fossil fuel subsidy. Maybe it is in a sense, but it's only because the idiot government
1.00
01:17:54.240
regulated it so badly that they were forced to buy it or allow it to die. That was the only
1.00
01:17:59.860
ends left. Private industry said to hell with you. We want no part of doing business in this country
0.99
01:18:04.360
because you can't, your system does not allow us to get things done. And even with the government
01:18:09.160
owning it, they still can't get the bloody thing done. And I get barked at all the time when I
01:18:13.220
talk about it. I know they're working on the Trans Mountain. I know there's a lot of crews
01:18:16.480
doing stuff on it, but it's going so slow. My great-grandchildren will be lucky to see that
01:18:21.660
thing produce at the rate it's bloody going. Plus they keep running out of money. So the government
01:18:25.800
said they're not going to put any more public money into it. And this is kind of the government
01:18:28.620
doing it in a roundabout way. They gave a whole pile of loan guarantees, which is kind of the same
01:18:33.320
way. They're saying you put the money into it and if it doesn't come back, we'll give it to you
01:18:36.560
later. So, uh, you know, it's, uh, ongoing, just get the damn thing done. The government is the
0.99
01:18:44.360
problem. Unfortunately, as usual, not the solution. If they would just get out of the damn way,
01:18:48.500
this thing would get done. The amount of permits and requirements and everything make it nearly
0.97
01:18:53.240
impossible. Speaking of other things, yes, an anti-pipeline anarchist group was under an
01:18:59.000
investigation. This was in the news the other day, uh, by the Montreal arson squad because they set
01:19:03.420
fire to luxury vehicles. I mean, it doesn't matter if they're luxury vehicles. I don't care if it
01:19:07.720
was a guy's 72 Datsun and it was worth 500 bucks. These are terrorists, guys. They're torching
0.98
01:19:12.840
stuff. We still haven't heard about what happened in BC with those guys who showed up with axe
01:19:18.000
handles and attacked a construction site in northern BC in the CGL pipeline. Now we got
01:19:23.940
these guys feeling emboldened enough to torch the vehicles of people. This was a former member of
01:19:32.140
Stephen Harper's government, and they've targeted him in his house. Well, that's got to be pretty
01:19:35.540
uncomfortable, and that's discomforting. Going to people's houses and getting that violent,
01:19:39.500
this is serious. What are we worried about? Well, they're worried about shutting down debate for
01:19:44.500
people who are swearing at Jagmeet Singh when he shows up at events. Guys, get your priorities
01:19:48.280
straight. We've got eco-terrorists running around out there, literal eco-terrorists. And you know,
01:19:54.060
it's surprising they haven't hurt somebody more seriously yet. And arson, arson is so serious. I
01:20:01.180
mean, you got to understand in Calgary, when the Forest Lawn Hotel got burned down, you know,
01:20:06.220
that was a case of an unprincipled owner burning it down for insurance money. People think that's
01:20:10.700
just insurance fraud. Yes, it is. But the only bigger problem, it killed a firefighter when he
01:20:14.180
tried to respond to it. That's one of the other serious aspects of arson. So you can't dismiss,
01:20:21.180
oh, they just burned a luxury car. I don't care. They lit a fire that was uncontrolled that could
01:20:25.960
very seriously hurt somebody. That's terrorism. It has to be called that. And they have to go
01:20:31.420
after them because they're going to kill somebody soon, guys. These guys are extremists. They're
0.99
01:20:35.960
out there and they're not going to stop because these pipelines can't stop because despite what
01:20:41.380
our kooky government and environmental activists think, we can't live without hydrocarbons. We
01:20:45.900
can't, we need them. So these pipelines are going to keep going. Those wells are going to keep
01:20:49.800
pumping. Those tankers are going to keep moving. So these lunatics are going to keep upping the
01:20:54.980
ante until we start jailing them. But again, we just catch and release, catch and release. We've
0.98
01:20:59.900
got guys like David Suzuki talking about blowing up pipelines, and then people shrugged that off.
01:21:05.400
Well, look at the inspiration and some of the lunatics that have been moving along with that.
01:21:12.300
We've got a real problem with terrorism going on. Let's see. This was another story that was
01:21:17.440
pretty big. I think Amanda wrote this one. I could be wrong with it. That was what the
01:21:32.360
for having the opportunity to take part in a training
01:21:44.460
in London, Ontario and they were going to fly on
01:21:48.460
vaccine ideologues, speaking of ideologues, speaking of extremists, actually marked their
01:21:53.560
hands, humiliated them, set them aside, and kept them from being able to take part in this.
01:22:00.680
How many times have we got to go over this? Vaccines don't stop the spread. It's not even
01:22:05.460
medical theory anymore or anything like that. That's been proven. It's shown. I mean, again,
01:22:09.880
they can reduce adverse outcomes. I support it that way. Again, I support choice. But this is
01:22:15.140
just punitive. It's embittered. It's wrong. And it targeted kids and it stole from them an
01:22:20.580
opportunity that they've been training and looking forward to. And as I said, humiliated them
01:22:24.700
and it's unforgivable. And that's why we got to keep reporting on this crap. We got to expose
1.00
01:22:28.780
this crap. So yeah, now they're apologizing. Now they're backpedaling. But you know what,
0.99
01:22:33.100
if it wasn't for alternative media and other people getting in there and exposing that crap,
0.99
01:22:36.100
these guys would still get away with it. It was True North actually, to give credit where it's due,
0.60
01:22:39.100
who found this with, you know, Candace Malcolm's group. So again, yes, self-serving,
01:23:14.440
I kind of, uh, uh, more supportive in the block in a way. I just believe in full secularity. You
01:23:19.720
know, nothing is prayer, just not necessarily in the place of our, uh, governance, but whatever,
01:23:23.400
it's, it's all symbolic and it's not the end of the world either way we look at it. But that is
01:23:27.020
another little news item that came up. So, okay, I'm going to wrap things up guys and get on with
01:23:31.720
the weekend here. I will be, uh, attending the, uh, at the Big Rock Brewery tomorrow night. Uh,
01:23:37.820
the Maverick party is going to have their leadership announcement. They had, they're
01:23:41.740
still out there they have a leadership race going on and it's uh they're gonna know who's leading
01:23:45.940
them tomorrow night so i'm just gonna be there to cover it and see what's happening what happened
01:23:48.960
there so if you're interested in that you don't come down to the big rock brewery or check out
01:23:52.280
the maverick party i think you gotta get a ticket but they're gonna have an event and then on monday
01:23:55.960
i'm gonna have he's back he's promised me he's got it down this time western standard columnist
01:24:01.560
lee harding and we're gonna talk about that new political party out in saskatchewa and so if we
01:24:05.560
have to get people to run and bang on his door and get him on the show we'll get him on there this
01:24:08.620
time. As you regular viewers know, I get real grumpy when I get stood up for shows. But I think
01:24:14.240
it was an honest mistake. So we'll get Lee back here to talk about that. And we're going to have
01:24:17.700
Spencer Fernando. He's a columnist. He's also with the National Citizens Coalition. And those who
01:24:23.160
know me, he's a prolific writer and a good conservative voice. And it should be a good
01:24:26.400
conversation having him back with the show. So that's about it for today, guys. Thank you all
01:24:31.040
for joining me. And I will see you all on Monday morning at 1130 a.m. Mountain Standard Time.