In response to a proposal from the Liberal Party of Canada, the party wants to ban the use of anonymous sources and stories in order to protect the privacy of whistle blowers and whistle blazers. But what does that mean for the freedom of the press?
00:00:00.000Elected individuals, they're actually independent of the parties they're members of.
00:00:04.680I mean, if you're a MLA or an MP, you are legally bound to represent your constituents, not necessarily the party, even though you're tightly tied to the party.
00:00:13.820So MLA's, MPs, they can be ejected from their own parties if they cross too many lines,
00:00:18.120but there's no legal obligation of any kind for an elected official to support the policies of a political party.
00:00:31.960Now, Prime Minister Trudeau, this is something you don't hear from me very often.
00:00:35.280Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is correct in distancing himself from a bizarre and rather outrageous policy resolution proposed and accepted by the Liberal Party membership at their last convention.
00:00:45.560Their policy calls for Ottawa, too, and this is in quotes,
00:00:49.060explore options to hold online information services accountable for the veracity of material published on their platform
00:00:55.540and to limit publication only to material where sources can be traced.
00:01:00.000Now, in other words, what they're saying with all that word salad there is they want to ban publication of news stories that are based on anonymous sources.
00:01:08.200Now, Canada's protection of whistleblowers is already terribly weak,
00:01:11.580and it forces government operatives with a conscience to either stay silent when they see government malfeasance
00:01:16.760or to leak information in what they feel is the public interest.
00:01:20.760Now, a few of them are going to leak if their anonymity can't be protected.
00:01:24.760Anonymous sources, I mean, they're important.
00:01:26.440They exposed some of the atrocities committed in the Vietnam War by American soldiers.
00:01:30.560I mean, that helped change some of the tone on things, as well as the government efforts to cover it up.
00:01:35.280Anonymous sources also brought improper national security agents surveillance activities that had been conducted against U.S. citizens and foreign officials to light in 2013.
00:01:44.460The government had overstepped, and anonymous sources exposed that.
00:01:47.320And, of course, who can forget the Watergate scandal?
00:01:49.820Well, that never would have been exposed without anonymous sources.
00:01:52.700Currently in Canada, somebody well-connected with CSIS has been leaking document after document
00:01:58.700on Chinese Communist Party interference in Canadian elections and affairs,
00:02:02.560while the government's ignored the issue.
00:02:04.940And so it's a little wonder that authoritarians in any government,
00:02:07.920and the Liberal Party of Canada Loyalists want to ban the use of anonymous sources and stories.
00:02:13.360It doesn't make such a ban right, though, or feasible.
00:02:16.100Such a policy would surely turn the national press against the Liberal government, finally.
00:02:19.960And it would likely be found to be unconstitutional once it hit the courts, and it would.