In this episode, the Commissioner of Public Safety and Ethics, Mr. Mike Duffy, answers questions submitted by the public regarding the investigation into whether the Prime Minister committed obstruction of justice in relation to the SNC-Lavalin scandal.
00:01:50.700The parameters did not allow you to get that evidence.
00:01:55.700Now, there is one person who had the authority to expand the parameters of that Order in Council,
00:02:04.020and that is the Prime Minister himself, correct?
00:02:08.040I would have to say, Mr. Chair, I'm not exactly sure of the exact process of where the Prime Minister would be involved in such a decision.
00:02:14.880However, I do believe the decision has to be made within the…
00:02:21.900I would submit the decision would have to be made by the Prime Minister, but the RCMP went and requested an expansion of the scope to obtain that evidence, to follow that evidence, correct?
00:02:33.460Before we proceeded with the assessment, yes, we did make a request for an expansion to the parameters.
00:02:40.640I would just add, Mr. Cooper, it was not to follow the evidence, it's to glean additional information.
00:02:47.620And that request was turned down on August 30th, 2019.
00:02:54.020I would have to say, Mr. Chair, that the request for the expansion was not allowed.
00:03:01.820It was turned down, and it was turned down by the PCO, the Prime Minister's Department, correct?
00:03:09.840Mr. Chair, we did receive a letter from the Department of Justice.
00:03:13.700I could not remember exactly, specifically, if this came from the…
00:03:18.020Well, it was from the PCO, and that's in the RCMP's investigation report.
00:03:24.660And would it be fair to say that the refusal by the Prime Minister's personal department, the PCO, to expand the scope of the order in council significantly impeded the full investigation into the Prime Minister's potential obstruction of justice?
00:03:43.960It limited our capability of pursuing a full investigation.
00:03:51.200And it would have limited it in a fairly significant way.
00:03:54.820Because, after all, we're talking about going to the heart of the matter of obstruction.
00:04:01.640And, again, I don't know what additional…
00:04:03.900Not knowing what additional information is out there, it's hard for me to speculate that there's a Pandora box out there which is full of information.
00:04:09.740So it's hard for us without speculating.
00:04:11.500Well, let the record show that the Prime Minister's Department, the PCO, obstructed the RCMP investigation into the Prime Minister's potential obstruction of justice.
00:04:24.700Are you aware of any other Canadian who can single-handedly block the RCMP from investigating his own criminality in such an effective way as the Prime Minister?
00:04:38.980I wouldn't use the term, Mr. President, I wouldn't use the term block.
00:04:44.420The RCMP is, when it runs an investigation, it operates within the parameters and the regulations that we're allowed to.
00:04:50.300And we see international security investigation as well with some information that we don't have access to, we can't use into an investigation.
00:04:56.060I think the answer to that question is there is no one who has such powers.
00:05:07.140And was any explanation provided by the Prime Minister's personal department why there was this refusal to expand the scope of the Order and Council?
00:05:14.820Again, Mr. Chair, as far as for response on this one, of course, it was indicated, of course, the importance, of course, of these privileges that do exist.
00:05:39.860That's what it would seem to me to be.
00:05:42.700How can the Prime Minister be subject to the rule of law, like every other Canadian, if his personal department can shield him from an RCMP criminal investigation?
00:05:54.160Mr. Chair, I'll let individuals draw their own conclusion.
00:05:59.000What I come back to is we operate within a set of regulations and parameters that, unfortunately, we made the effort to go and get additional information, and it was refused.