Western Standard - April 25, 2024


Trudeau’s War on the Constitution


Episode Stats

Length

43 minutes

Words per Minute

172.73026

Word Count

7,541

Sentence Count

501

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

15


Summary

Western Standard Opinion Editor Nigel Hannaford and Senior Alberta Columnist Corey Morgan join host Derek Fildebrandt to discuss Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's latest comments on the need for provinces to do what he wants them to do, and what they should do if they don't.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good day, I'm Derek Fildebrandt, publisher of the Western Standard, and you're watching
00:00:27.360 the pipeline. Today is April 24th, and we've got a great show coming up for you. I'm joined
00:00:32.920 as always by Western Standard opinion editor, Nigel Hannaford. Good to be here. And Western
00:00:39.180 Standard senior Alberta columnist, Corey Morgan. Always thrilled to be here. Yeah, we actually
00:00:44.400 screwed up getting the show earlier. We had a great little tent of tent going, but when
00:00:49.120 you're just starting over again, you just kind of, you lose the flow. Just can't recreate
00:00:53.200 it. It would just lack the magic. Okay, well, we've got a great show. We're going to be
00:00:59.500 talking about Trudeau's war on the Constitution. More recently and specifically, his comments
00:01:05.700 that if the provinces don't do what he wants them to do, he's just going to go around them
00:01:10.420 into their areas of jurisdiction. We're going to be talking about those comments specifically,
00:01:14.760 but also putting it in the broader context of his regular attacks on the Constitutional
00:01:20.100 Order of Canada, constantly hammering into areas of provincial jurisdiction, areas that have gotten
00:01:25.940 him in trouble at the Supreme Court, basic constitutional violations like, I don't know,
00:01:31.640 seizing bank accounts without just cause, things like that. We'll also be talking about his
00:01:37.200 dangerously weak response to something within his jurisdiction, which is condemning terrorism.
00:01:43.020 marches over the last week, right past Parliament Hill, with thousands of people carrying a Hamas
00:01:50.740 terrorist insignia, chanting Hamas terrorist slogans, calling for the removal of Jews from Israel,
00:02:02.360 brazenly and very clearly praising the rape and murder of Israeli civilians on the October 7th attacks,
00:02:10.480 and just the very weak-need response to it, and the even somehow weaker response of Chrystia Freeland.
00:02:19.860 We're going to talk about the Global Mail dug something up very interesting, although their response
00:02:24.500 to it was a bit odd. Alberta's new review of the province's COVID response. You'll recall the Jason
00:02:32.260 Kenney government had a review conducted by doctors that agreed with the Kenney government,
00:02:38.120 and no surprise, they agreed with the Kenney government. Well, Smith has appointed
00:02:42.420 some doctors who did not agree with the Kenney government, and the media are shocked that these
00:02:48.760 people might not agree with what the Kenney government did. And we're going to do an update
00:02:53.700 on the NDP leadership race. There was a cutoff for the membership sales for those who could vote in the
00:02:58.820 NDP leadership race. It's shaping up much less interesting than I had hoped it was before
00:03:05.720 Nenshi. Before Nenshi's entrance, it looked like it could really be anybody's game, but increasingly
00:03:11.440 it looks like purple is the new orange. So let's get into it from the top. Trudeau is saying pretty
00:03:18.880 clearly if, you know, provinces don't do his bidding, well, he's just going to go around them.
00:03:23.940 I'm just going to try and figure out ways to help Canadians directly as necessary. I'd always
00:03:29.620 rather work with provinces, but if we have to, I will go around them and be there for Canadians,
00:03:35.380 because this economy deserves young Canadians getting the support they need.
00:03:42.240 Nigel, do you think he was just maybe getting a little excited about himself or is this something
00:03:48.600 he means? Oh, he means it. And I think the interesting takeaway from that one, apart from
00:03:53.760 the substance of it, is that it is always in these little unguarded moments when he's away from the
00:04:01.060 teleprompter that he reveals what he really thinks. You know, we've got more than a 10-year supply of
00:04:09.360 this from the time that in 2013 when he was asked on a, like he was nobody at the time, not even the
00:04:18.120 official opposition. That was the NDP. Now he was asked on a women's TV program, what other country
00:04:23.700 than Canada did he admire? And he said, China, but it was their ability to get things done.
00:04:28.020 Everybody kind of, well, that's a funny thing to say, but he meant it. He actually was...
00:04:34.020 And he's not actually wrong. They can actually get things done.
00:04:36.920 Well, yeah. Tremendous human cost, but they can actually get something done.
00:04:40.720 It says Dahmer was a chef too, but...
00:04:42.640 All of these...
00:04:44.420 Jeez, Corey. What's that?
00:04:48.060 It's Corey being Corey.
00:04:49.440 Yeah.
00:04:50.780 All of these ghost apartment blocks, I don't know whether they really, they're so great.
00:04:55.060 But the point is, he thinks they are. And it was an unusual thing to say, and he said it in a
00:04:59.520 casual moment. And then he'll say other things in casual moments. You think, you really think that?
00:05:03.540 Well, here is another where he's away from the teleprompter. So, sir, what are you going
00:05:08.320 to do? I just go around them. Well, you know what? We have a constitution. We have a set
00:05:14.880 of rules. We have custom and procedure. And it is the observation of these things that
00:05:20.120 has actually given Canada incredible stamina as a nation over the years. You know, to find
00:05:28.720 there's only four countries that you can find that have got a really long, enduring history
00:05:33.520 of uninterrupted governmental action. Great Britain, the United States, Iceland, and Canada,
00:05:39.800 going back to 1867. Now, sure, there are older countries, but you know, the French are on
00:05:45.880 their fifth republic. Germans are on, you're not allowed to call it the fourth right.
00:05:49.360 Second, you know, you've got a second republic.
00:05:50.860 Second, all right, the second republic. You know, all of this in the last, you know, in
00:05:55.740 the time since Canada entered Confederation. So we got something right in 1867, and we've
00:06:01.580 been doing it right. And now Mr. Trudeau thinks that we've been doing it wrong, and he can
00:06:06.200 do better. He has not proved his case, gentlemen.
00:06:10.160 You know, federalism, as we think of it, I think evolved out of the feudal system, because
00:06:17.260 feudalism, in a sense, had a lot of the characteristics of feudalism, of federalism, and you think kind
00:06:26.280 of the structure of the Holy Roman Empire. There was a feudal relationship, but they were
00:06:31.120 still sovereign in their own right, post-Thirty Years' War. But I think Trudeau views federalism
00:06:39.820 in the older feudal sense of owing allegiance to. And it's the senior legion's job, merely
00:06:47.480 to protect the lower one, the lower one's job, to do the bidding of the higher. Or perhaps
00:06:53.300 it's just more that he views the provinces as departments of the federal government that
00:06:58.060 are annoyingly elected on their own. But they're simply just elected departments of a greater
00:07:04.200 whole. And that's very much not the way it works. There is a queen of Alberta,
00:07:09.820 there is a queen of Saskatchewan. It happened to also be the same as the queen of England
00:07:13.740 and the queen of Canada. But there are crowns in the real town.
00:07:16.440 King as we...
00:07:17.160 Oh, sorry.
00:07:18.740 Monarch.
00:07:19.140 Old habits. Old habits die hard.
00:07:22.620 I liked her, too.
00:07:23.340 Yeah. But, Corey, I mean, a father like son here. The father had very, very little respect
00:07:31.820 for the provinces. You know, would criticize Joe Clark as trying to be head waiter to the provinces,
00:07:37.740 which is probably the nicest thing I've ever said about Joe Clark. But
00:07:41.520 I don't know how much he can win here, because he's sparking such backlash. Coming right out of
00:07:48.700 this, the Smith government here in Alberta introduced, I forget what they're calling this
00:07:53.220 bill, but essentially forbidding municipalities in Alberta, which are constitutionally a part
00:07:58.180 of the province, not separate on their own, forbidding them from dealing directly with
00:08:02.220 the federal government, because the federal government for decades has tried to come in
00:08:06.460 to deal with municipalities directly as a way of circumventing provincial jurisdiction. So
00:08:10.100 Trudeau is just creating more and more backlash here, I think making it increasingly difficult
00:08:15.460 for him to impose his will on the provinces.
00:08:17.340 I mean, Trudeau Sr. had no respect for the provinces, but at least he was smart enough to
00:08:20.740 understand what the constitution is.
00:08:22.480 And I mean...
00:08:23.000 Or to change it.
00:08:23.640 Yeah. Yeah. So, you know, Justin Trudeau, I don't think he really understands. We're a
00:08:29.040 federation. We're not a unitary form of government. Like, we are built to have a degree of autonomy
00:08:35.080 in these provinces. I don't think it's... I don't think he really understands it. So this is just to...
00:08:42.400 As far as he's concerned, it's paperwork. It's in the way. And he's got a bit of a... I think he's losing
00:08:49.220 it to a degree. A messiah complex. I know what's best, and darn it, I'm gonna get it done. And these
00:08:54.540 guys are in the way, and I will do, by hook or by crook, what citizens need of me. It's
00:09:00.520 really hitting that point when you... And Nigel said it starts to slip out. We're seeing it slip
00:09:03.920 out more and more. He's been in too long. He's been surrounded, almost cloistered by people
00:09:11.340 who, you know... Yes, people. He's lost grip on what the role really entails, what the country's
00:09:17.140 really built upon. And he doesn't understand what he's doing to this country, because unity
00:09:20.940 is more fractured now than it's ever been. He should have understood, after the Supreme
00:09:24.900 Court rejected his flagship, Bill C-69, the no pipelines rule. Up until then, you could
00:09:30.260 have said, well, he just doesn't get it. He doesn't think about monetary policy. He doesn't
00:09:34.540 read his briefings. Okay, you know. But when the court actually turns around and says, no,
00:09:41.600 what you did there was unconstitutional, and the best that he's got is come back and say,
00:09:45.940 well, you know, we don't care. You know, we think it's constitutional. So he should have
00:09:54.060 understood at that point. Now, I think this is just perverse.
00:09:57.320 It is. And, you know, he's trying a game, almost. I mean, it's political play. When he
00:10:03.240 goes to the municipalities, he's taking the money, and he's trying to play sugar daddy and
00:10:07.800 bringing it back, because that's how he's fighting with the provinces. And then as soon
00:10:10.660 as the province speaks up, because he's bypassing him, he's trying to portray the premiers as
00:10:15.460 being the ogre, say, look, they're preventing me from doing good things. But I think most
00:10:19.540 Canadians, and it's showing in the polls, understand Trudeau's dangling money he took
00:10:23.440 from their wallet in the first place.
00:10:24.840 Well, and it isn't just this most recent case where he openly said, well, the provinces
00:10:30.020 don't do what I want. I'm going to go around them. There's been a lot of major constitutional
00:10:34.440 court defeats for Trudeau. Now, he's had some wins that I think were dubious judicial
00:10:40.520 merit, like on the carbon tax. That's going to get dismantled just to the plain old democratic
00:10:45.740 system, not through constitutional protections. But he lost on the plastic straws ban and bans
00:10:52.080 on water bottle drink box things, if you can recall that. He lost on the Emergencies Act,
00:11:01.640 you know, where it was found pretty clearly to have been done inappropriately, not necessary
00:11:06.940 in a violation of basic constitutional rights. So it's, it's not just against the provinces
00:11:12.120 where he's been found, let's say, having a rather liberal interpretation of the Constitution.
00:11:21.680 But even as it involves going out violating the rights of individual people as well.
00:11:27.000 Well, you'd think someone who is the son of the man who's the primary author of the Charter
00:11:34.780 of Rights and Freedoms would have some conception of its basic parameters and how it would be
00:11:40.280 applied.
00:11:41.920 Well, you would, wouldn't you? But, you know, you just, you just ran through a whole list
00:11:47.960 of things. Well, here's a few more. He does not understand the ethics of what a prime minister
00:11:54.540 can accept as a gift and what he must refuse on principle. It is unusual to have a prime
00:12:01.500 minister reviewed by the ethics commissioner. I think it's five times that the ethics commissioner
00:12:06.540 has come into his area and said, well, actually, sir, you know, you shouldn't, you shouldn't
00:12:11.500 actually do this. You have the whole scandal surrounding SNC level and were very clearly
00:12:17.700 longstanding customs and traditions of how things are done. We're completely overlooked.
00:12:26.020 And the man is, I don't know, I still don't have an opinion as to whether he's foolish or whether
00:12:34.740 he is ignorant or whether he's actually the smartest one of all of us because he's getting
00:12:40.820 what he wants. But certainly there are enough people in the Privy Council office and around him
00:12:46.500 in the prime minister's office to say, this you can do, this you can't, sir. And then he says,
00:12:54.180 well, we're doing it anyway. Now that is the, that is the, the, the fracture in, in this whole thing.
00:13:01.540 He thinks he can do anything if it's in a good cause.
00:13:04.900 Well, to a degree he's right. As I said, maybe it's not so much brilliance, but I see it as more
00:13:08.980 as a spoiled child, but he's realizing too, that I can do this. I'll face sanction two years from
00:13:14.180 now. The Supreme court says, don't do that again. Oh, okay. I mean, there's no consequence.
00:13:18.740 There never has been. And also once things gets, it takes a long time for things to get struck down
00:13:22.900 in court. This morning I, uh, you know, I was, I was getting something at the coffee shop. Uh,
00:13:28.500 I was getting a cold coffee and I just brought a plastic straw from my truck that, you know,
00:13:33.380 like this contraband straw I bought on Amazon. Um, and the coffee shop still has paper straws.
00:13:39.140 Uh, actually the guy who runs it, he's angry about it, but it's just this unconstitutional
00:13:45.780 paper straw law, uh, was imposed on them. And now it's just kind of stuck, even though the laws struck
00:13:51.460 down, they've managed to largely get their way. I think the municipality still bans them under Gondek.
00:13:56.020 We've got layers and layers to go through. Yeah. Well, because the, the, the issue there was that
00:14:00.100 the federal government didn't have the right to do it, but provinces and municipalities,
00:14:02.900 perhaps, um, on a constitutional level. Um, but what it meant is that even though this was
00:14:10.660 unconstitutional, it was in place for long enough that it just largely became the norm
00:14:14.580 among large corporations that are pretty slow to change tack on these things. So he still kind of
00:14:19.540 got his way, even though it was found to be totally unconstitutional. All right.
00:14:24.820 Okay. Break time for commercial.
00:14:32.020 I'm going to try to get better at doing like, not just immediately going in, doing a segmented segmented.
00:14:37.940 All right. Um, we're going to stay on the topic of Trudeau here, uh, but something that is within his
00:14:51.700 area to control legally. And that's just what he says in reaction to events.
00:14:56.820 October 7th is proof that we are almost free. Long live October 7th. Long live the resistance.
00:15:05.860 Long live the indifada. Long live every form of resistance.
00:15:10.900 Openly cheering the rape and murder of women and children from the October 7th attacks,
00:15:16.740 um, hailing Hamas, hailing Hamas's goals, carrying Hamas's symbols. Uh, you know, we can remember
00:15:27.540 when there was one, uh, one person had a national socialist flag on Parliament Hill or near Parliament
00:15:33.060 Hill, uh, during the trucker freedom convoy. Um, and it was found that that person was almost certainly
00:15:40.420 a false flag, almost certainly not a part of it, but appeared there. And in an instant,
00:15:46.020 Trudeau had a comment. He knew to denounce that. I mean, that's an easy thing and a right thing to
00:15:51.700 denounce, even though it was pretty clearly a false flag. We suspected at the time and have a large
00:15:57.620 amount of evidence to prove afterwards, but he denounced it immediately, right then and there.
00:16:01.940 Freeland immediately right there. Um, this happens and it takes, uh, how long, how long did it take
00:16:10.500 Trudeau? It took, it took Freeland days, several days, um, took Trudeau forever. And, and, uh, actually,
00:16:17.700 let's just play, uh, Trudeau's own response here, his own words.
00:16:24.260 So, I, he's got to say it for himself. I'm not going to put words in his mouth. Uh, Nigel, uh, would it
00:16:31.460 have been difficult to say something a little tougher and sooner? Well, you know, I think the obvious thing
00:16:35.940 would have been to denounce people who, um, had unacceptable opinions for the most part,
00:16:42.340 misogynist and racist, you know, I mean, how racist, how much more racist can you get than
00:16:47.460 calling for the destruction of other people? How much more misogynist can you get than
00:16:51.860 raping people? Or, or just, uh, well, let's not even, let's not even go there. No, I mean,
00:16:58.740 clearly this should have been the easiest thing in the world to say that's unacceptable in Canada. We don't
00:17:05.220 go for that. We do not tolerate that. If we find out who's responsible, we're going to line them up.
00:17:11.060 Yes. Canadians have a right to protest. He did say that, but they do not have a right to call
00:17:17.220 for the extermination of a people. And especially if people, it already knows far too much about
00:17:24.100 extermination. Um, that should have been easy. It writes itself. I didn't come prepared to say that.
00:17:31.300 It just, it just rolls off the tongue. That's who we ought to be, but apparently we're not,
00:17:37.380 we have to really carefully think about it. And why do we do that? Probably because you don't want
00:17:43.620 to upset all those potential liberal voters. And frankly, gentlemen, if that's who a liberal voter,
00:17:50.180 if that's who that government is now depending on, it is even more a time for change.
00:17:56.900 Well, that's, that's where I want to go with you, Corey is, you know, is, I mean,
00:18:01.700 the liberals have traditionally been strong with, uh, newer immigrant groups, you know,
00:18:06.020 first and second generation. And, and that, that goes back some time. And, uh, there was an
00:18:10.980 aberration for that after the 2011 election, uh, with Harper's majority government win, but,
00:18:16.180 you know, traditionally the liberals and not just in Canada, across most, much of the Western world,
00:18:20.900 center left and left parties tend to do better with immigrant groups, right parties tend to be a bit more
00:18:24.900 nationalistic and less welcoming of at least mass, large numbers of migration. Um, but the liberals
00:18:32.580 seem, have never been this, you know, they've always been a bit pandering, you know, like they'll
00:18:37.380 wear the clothes and they'll shut up to the events and, oh, fine, whatever. That's fine. That's it.
00:18:41.780 That's retail politics. I get that. But I've never seen it so radically impact the domestic politics
00:18:51.300 and the foreign policy of a government the way it has in the, you know, since October 7th here.
00:18:58.660 How strong is the influence of this kind of hardline Islamist, um, uh, voter constituency as an impact
00:19:09.460 on the liberal party's fortunes that, that they seem so reticent to denounce the most easily
00:19:16.740 denounceable things in the world? I don't know. I don't get it. I mean, that there's, that's just a fringe
00:19:21.860 of an immigrant group that, I mean, most Islamic people have no interest in slaughtering and wiping
00:19:28.020 out the Jews. And we've got large immigrant communities that certainly want no part in this fight,
00:19:32.180 whether it's the Hindu community or Sikhs or so many others. So you're pandering to this micro of a micro
00:19:37.540 of an offensive group that is, is been building, you know, it's been permissiveness for months with
00:19:43.780 this group and excuses. So they're, they're just criticizing Israel and then, or from the river to
00:19:48.900 the sea. Oh, you're interpreting that wrong. No, you're not. They want to squish Jews guys, but okay,
00:19:53.140 fine. We let that slide. But as it's gone on, the few who were a bit moderate, the few who perhaps
00:19:59.380 really thought they were just being critical of Israel, they've left those protests. And that's
00:20:03.860 why we're seeing the ugly core of it a lot more. Some of them are getting worse, but I mean,
00:20:09.380 I think of an example we saw in Calgary the other week with that clown standing there with a big
00:20:13.300 beatific grin on his face, doing a Nazi salute, holding up a picture of the Ayatollah
00:20:17.620 and, uh, at a group of Jewish people. And I mean, the messaging wasn't very subtle there. And a blue
00:20:24.820 haired, usual, typical, uh, white bread, uh, progressive came up and you could see her saying,
00:20:29.220 you know, could you do that? And he basically told her, the media is looking, maybe don't do it right
00:20:32.740 here. You know, jam it up your ass woman. He told her, and she wandered away in frustration.
00:20:37.060 She might not be back to that demonstration. That was the voice. That was an example of seeing the
00:20:40.340 voice of the moderate trying and losing. And now as we're seeing that core and we're seeing
00:20:44.820 how emboldened they are, that demonstration we saw earlier, they're not hiding it anymore.
00:20:48.980 They're not criticizing Israel. They're celebrating openly celebrating October 7th,
00:20:53.860 the act of terrorism. And Trudeau's gotten himself into such a habit that he can't critique these people
00:20:59.220 that even when they're practically on the veritable point of waving swastikas, he can't immediately say,
00:21:05.060 okay, this is it. The line has been crossed. And they're going to be more bold next week.
00:21:08.900 And the week after, because as long as they realize there's no close to this though,
00:21:12.740 that extreme group is going to keep coming out. I don't think there's a large voter constituency,
00:21:16.820 but it's like they've trained the liberals. You know, I, I, I don't think there's a large
00:21:23.620 constituency for, uh, people demanding Canada do something to assist in the annihilation of the
00:21:29.220 Jews and the river to the sea stuff. Um, but I, I think there's also, you know, moderate anti-Israel,
00:21:37.780 if we can call it that, you know, they, uh, they want to cut down the size, you know,
00:21:41.940 give it a bit of a thrashing, but they're not necessarily in the, the full blown genocide.
00:21:45.700 The naive two state solution idea that every time Israel tries it, they get bombed for trying.
00:21:50.980 Yeah.
00:21:51.460 But either way, I think it's a well-meaning, maybe not.
00:21:54.100 Admirably naive types there.
00:21:56.340 They, that's gone. This is, this is pure hate now.
00:21:59.300 Yeah. But I, I think he's afraid of offending them too, by seeing to take a side. And it's seen,
00:22:05.060 and Trudeau, I think, sees it as taking a side, Nigel, to condemn a march in front of Parliament Hill,
00:22:12.500 calling for the annihilation of the Jews in Israel.
00:22:14.420 Well, and he sees that as taking a side and therefore not engaging in the
00:22:18.580 Canadian doublespeak, you know, uh, what is it, uh, peace broker role where we don't have to take a side.
00:22:25.380 And that really is how he sees it. Then the only thing I can say is he is wrong.
00:22:32.020 You cannot, you cannot give any room to a group of people recommending that another group of people
00:22:41.460 be killed. That's in Canadian. That's not, that's not what this country is about. It's not even
00:22:48.020 ethically defensible in any other country, but good Lord.
00:22:51.620 I want to discuss also where the hell are the police on hate speech here? Where are the hate
00:22:55.540 speech laws? You know, you could get some crank, you know, in his basement and, you know, 1988,
00:23:01.780 some Keekstra type putting out nasty things. And like, I don't know, maybe his pamphlets were read
00:23:08.100 by like a couple of hundred people, probably very few of which ever gave it a second thought until he
00:23:14.900 appeared on television, uh, after being charged, you know, just some crank and we go after him.
00:23:20.820 That's actually hateful. And then we have cases that are not hateful. Like when the human rights
00:23:25.700 commissions came out for the Western standard and McLean's and the mid two thousands for publishing
00:23:31.540 articles that, uh, radical Islamists found to be offensive or cartoons that were found to be
00:23:37.860 offensive. These things authorities are willing to go after as hate crimes, but then openly and
00:23:45.060 brazenly calling for genocide. There's been nothing. There's been absolutely nothing, not even of the
00:23:51.620 organizers, let alone other participants who are just shouting, uh, genocidal slogans. So Derek, if you
00:23:57.540 have got a lone solitary hate merchant in his basement in a small rural community, it doesn't take much
00:24:07.780 for three squad cars to pull up outside the door, five to kick down the door and haul him away and
00:24:14.580 charge him and put him through the ringer. When you have got hundreds, if not thousands of people,
00:24:21.460 not nearly in one city, but in several others, you're starting to look at what the police are
00:24:27.380 physically capable of doing. Do you want to call out the, uh, the army in support of the civil power?
00:24:35.940 That is enough. Well, they thought about doing it for a couple of truckers. Well, they did,
00:24:39.940 but you notice that they didn't think of doing it for this. They will let this go in the hope, uh, that
00:24:46.260 it will stop, that it will all blow over and it will cease to be an issue by October of 2025. I don't know
00:24:54.660 that it will, but that is the strategy. They do not have the force to counteract this.
00:25:02.580 I couldn't, I could see you. You couldn't stop it while it's an action without causing a potential
00:25:06.340 riot. I mean, it would have been problematic, but we're hearing even progressive voices. I mean,
00:25:11.780 we're watching Warren Kinsella, for example, he is mortified by this and he's saying openly,
00:25:17.300 and he's always pro immigrant and everything else. A lot of these people are not Canadian citizens yet.
00:25:22.660 It wouldn't be that hard. You know, if you picked out 20 from each of these protests and suddenly
00:25:27.460 they found themselves on the plane back to where they were going, I gotta, or where they came from,
00:25:31.700 I've got a feeling a whole lot of people who are not Canadian citizens within those protests. I think
00:25:35.860 maybe I should just kind of tone my message down a little because I don't want to be the next one
00:25:39.940 back over there. Free Gaza trips. Yeah. You know, I mean, I'm not saying mass deportations,
00:25:44.180 but just some examples. You came here to be a Canadian citizen. You're welcome. That's great.
00:25:48.100 Make a life. But if you want to do that crap on our streets, here's the ticket home guys. We don't
00:25:53.220 have room for that. We got a lot of other people who would gladly fill your spot in this country.
00:25:57.700 There's, there's things the federal government could do if they found the will,
00:26:00.020 but they don't have any indication.
00:26:00.740 They don't have the will. And I, I, I'm not sure they do have the, the strength,
00:26:05.220 like the physical boots on the ground. It would be tough.
00:26:07.540 The courts and human rights commissions have intimated to a significant degree that they
00:26:13.380 generally don't find it to be hateful if it's not essentially a white guy.
00:26:20.100 Yeah. If it's Christian and white, that kind of stuff.
00:26:23.140 Oh, that's critical theory.
00:26:24.340 Because, because there can't be reverse racism and, and, and, and in the, uh, yeah, in the,
00:26:30.900 in the, in the, in the critical race theory world and all of this stuff, uh, the Jews are now white.
00:26:39.140 Some appear to be white. Some do not. In Israel, majority do not appear to be white.
00:26:42.980 Sephardic Jews are pretty dark.
00:26:44.180 Exactly. They're, they're not, they're not most of the Jews we would know would say Canada.
00:26:48.580 Most are not Sephardic here, but, uh, they have essentially become white.
00:26:53.860 In the, in this worldview and therefore they are capable of racism.
00:26:58.260 They are capable of, uh, uh, what's the term they use?
00:27:03.220 Um, privilege, privilege in these things, oppression, they can be an oppressor group.
00:27:09.140 Yeah. And, and so there's just so much of this weird stuff going on.
00:27:11.780 So, and therefore the, you know, these groups that are marching,
00:27:14.180 which are generally not white, although a lot of people cheering for genocide are now just
00:27:18.660 dumb liberal white college kids. Um, but they're apparently not privileged.
00:27:23.860 Um, but yeah, it's just that they're not able to be charged because they're not,
00:27:28.260 uh, they're a part of, uh, equity seeking groups is what they call it now. So.
00:27:34.580 So the old twin campus solution for Columbia University.
00:27:38.020 Yeah.
00:27:38.260 Yeah.
00:27:38.900 The two, the two, the two campus solution.
00:27:41.460 Uh, yes. One in America, one in Gaza.
00:27:44.180 You bet.
00:27:44.980 Let's just, uh, set up a new, uh, new, new campus for the wind gas. I'll let them go.
00:27:49.300 All right. So when Kenny was premier, you know, he had a chess conduct a review of how they did.
00:27:57.460 And, you know, the, uh, the doctor appointed to head it and the panel appointed to do this.
00:28:04.260 Um, they had all come into this generally supporting the government's view of crackdowns,
00:28:11.060 mandates, uh, arrests, that kind of stuff. And surprise, surprise, they agree that this was a
00:28:16.420 good thing that the government had conducted itself generally effectively and well.
00:28:20.660 Um, uh, I think it's Carrie Tate, uh, of the global mail. Um, uh,
00:28:26.740 global mail had an article, an interesting article, uh, story, I think just yesterday, uh,
00:28:31.140 that, uh, there's a second panel, uh, in AHS, uh, commissioned by the Smith government
00:28:38.100 to review the response. And unlike the Kenny panel, there are at least some doctors involved
00:28:43.780 here that did not agree with everything the Kenny government did. Um, so it's an interesting story
00:28:50.020 that we're having a second review. I thought that was a good thing, but the general reaction from
00:28:55.780 the pundit, uh, the pundit class, the media class has been horrible. How could we possibly have a
00:29:02.420 review of government actions for people who were critical of the government? Because the report that
00:29:08.580 that report could be critical of the government's response. And I think here, we'll start with you,
00:29:13.380 Corey. I think the reason the media is so upset about this is because the media was so all in on
00:29:20.020 following government talking points during COVID. Um, you know, we tried to position ourselves as a
00:29:25.540 standard here between the mainstream media, which saw themselves as conveying good and reliable
00:29:32.500 information, which unwittingly turned them into propaganda, propagandists for the government.
00:29:37.300 And then on the other side, you know, some people who, uh, you know, read some unnamed blog from
00:29:42.740 Azerbaijan that you've never heard before. And it, yeah, full of conspiracy theories and just baseless
00:29:48.580 loopholes and things like that. We tried to be independent, uh, finding middle ground on a lot
00:29:53.940 of these issues. Um, but the Canadian legacy media and most of the legacy media around the planet,
00:29:59.620 they were so all in on just repeating the government's message on these things
00:30:03.540 and changing the message whenever the government's messaging changed as well.
00:30:07.380 I think that's why they're so defensive here is that how could there possibly be a credible review
00:30:12.420 conducted by doctors that could come to the conclusion that the government was wrong and therefore
00:30:16.900 we were wrong. Well, that's part of it. There's pride. They invested themselves in that messaging
00:30:22.260 the whole time. But I mean, do we want to learn from this or not? You know, do I mean, if we did
00:30:27.460 have an unvarnished look and it turned out, boy, yes. In fact, what they did saved, if we could find
00:30:32.820 a measurable way, this many lives, fine. We've learned from that. But the problem they have is
00:30:36.900 that doctor, and I'm forgetting his name, Davison. He said the emperor has no clothes and there's some
00:30:41.860 truth to it. I mean, that messaging was considered blasphemy at the time, but there was truth
00:30:45.860 to it. The hospital hallways were empty. They'd shut down the hospitals except for the most dire
00:30:50.900 of emergencies and deferred procedures, which had a very serious cost and health implications of
00:30:56.740 people later. It is ridiculous that we don't talk about this because this, whether unintentional or
00:31:02.260 not, was a cost of the government policies. Did they save theoretically so many lives that it was
00:31:08.100 worth deferring those cancer treatments, those hip surgeries, those other things or not? Let's have a
00:31:13.620 look at it. Let's have a look at it from a government, a doctor who was willing at least
00:31:17.540 to break the orthodoxy. He's still presumably a doctor, still cares about the well being of people
00:31:22.020 and patients. And it's ridiculous to shoot this down at this point, just because you don't like the
00:31:27.060 voice of the doctor who's questioning it right now. Nigel, the media seemed to have had no issues
00:31:35.940 with the preconceived notions of the previous chair of the previous Kenny panel,
00:31:40.500 who went into it generally believing in the at least the broad outlines of the government's
00:31:46.820 actions at the time. That wasn't considered coming into this with a bias of preconceived notions.
00:31:53.140 But now you have a guy who was critical of at least some government measures during this
00:31:58.420 period, openly so, and all of a sudden that's having preconceived notions about what we should have.
00:32:04.340 Going into this with a bias, let me untangle that for us. Well, gosh, let's start with the gentleman
00:32:12.740 himself. He was at one stage in his career, head of emergency medicine, I believe it was in Red Deer.
00:32:21.860 And so we're not talking about a fellow out in a rural area who can't get employed in town
00:32:31.860 because there's something about him that people, this is a serious professional whose ideas may be
00:32:39.540 right and they may be wrong, but they're not based on prejudice. This is somebody who's actually
00:32:46.740 in the dill and who saw what was going on and had doubts about what was going on. So,
00:32:54.580 like I said, I wouldn't presume to say that because he differs from the narrative, therefore,
00:33:00.980 he must be right. But I absolutely wouldn't say that because he varies from the narrative,
00:33:07.700 he absolutely must be wrong and we should get somebody else who actually really understands this
00:33:11.780 stuff. You know, we've seen this before. In 2022, the Canadian Medical Journal published an article
00:33:20.180 in which it purported to review how Canada had done to that point, June 2022. Well,
00:33:27.380 guess who they got to write the review? The people who wrote the rules 18 months before.
00:33:32.740 What would you expect them to say? Oh, just everything worked just great. Well,
00:33:36.340 this was actually a time of lockdowns, enormous economic damage, children being kept out of
00:33:42.740 school. We're still seeing the effects of that. There is no way that you can go back to the authors
00:33:48.980 of the rules and say, well, how did it work out? Of course, it's going to work out great. So maybe you
00:33:53.220 should have somebody like, I believe his name is Davidson. You should have somebody like that come in
00:33:59.300 and say, well, let's just look at this again. The whole problem is who do you trust to review something
00:34:05.140 like this? I don't trust, none of us should ever trust any agency of the federal government because
00:34:12.500 they are the same people who wrote the rules. They are going to say it was great. Do I trust,
00:34:18.900 you know, do I trust the National Citizen Inquiry? I'd like to. I think they did wonderful work. But
00:34:25.780 when all is said and all is done, they don't have the official imprimatur of an agency that you can hold
00:34:32.580 to account. Well, Preston Manning had some, I thought his report was helpful, didn't go far
00:34:38.260 enough. I hope this report goes the distance. All right. Well, I want to turn towards the NDP's
00:34:47.860 leadership race in Alberta here. You know, I hate to say it, but man, New Democrats are so much nicer to
00:34:54.980 each other than conservatives. Conservatives. Conservatives know how to have a leadership
00:35:00.020 race. It's World War III every time. I mean, it's never a tame affair. It's life and death. Now,
00:35:11.140 normally because you're fighting to be the premier. Now, this is the first real NDP leadership race
00:35:17.460 ever. The NDP leadership race in 2014 that elected Rachel Notley, I could be wrong. Someone
00:35:24.100 correct me after if I'm wrong, but I think it was about 5,000 people voted. Yeah, something like
00:35:28.820 that. It was very small. There are UCP local nomination races that get that in a single
00:35:33.300 constituency. The entire NDP across Alberta had about 5,000 votes cast in that leadership race
00:35:39.380 because you were running to be the leader of the fourth party. It was an insignificant fringe party that
00:35:44.580 became the government because of the wild set of circumstances that we won't have to re-ash here.
00:35:49.940 This is the NDP's first real leadership race where you are auditioning to be the leader of the
00:35:55.220 opposition and potentially premier. The NDP can conceivably win power in Alberta now.
00:36:04.260 So it's actually a decent political job. If you're on the left in Alberta, it's probably the best job
00:36:09.060 short of being a federal liberal cabinet minister. So it's a big deal-ish, but it's been so low
00:36:17.780 profile. So before we get into, I guess you can take it wherever you want. We'll start with you,
00:36:23.140 Nigel. Why do you think it's been such a polite and dull affair compared to the last two UCP leadership
00:36:30.500 races that were just short of Omaha Beach? Well, a couple of reasons. One, of course, is that
00:36:43.060 conservatives worry about principles and they get very defensive of them. I'm not sure that's a bad
00:36:49.700 thing. I'm not sure the NDP don't here. There's a lot of dedicated socialists there who care about
00:36:54.420 their ideas. That was my second point. I'm not in front of the children. You know, we can rip each
00:37:01.140 other apart behind closed doors, but let's, you know, let's look respectable when we present ourselves
00:37:07.780 to the public. We'll see how it goes in some of the debates, because there are some personalities
00:37:12.580 in that group of five people who I think won't be able to hold back when it finally comes to it.
00:37:18.420 Well, they haven't had debates yet. We'll see old Gil. He's still, you know,
00:37:22.420 he's going to have a hard time playing. It's going to be too bad for him. I guess it's a 100%
00:37:30.100 membership vote now. There's not a 20% allocation for the unions anymore.
00:37:34.180 Yeah, it's an allocation on the board of the party, but not in the leadership.
00:37:39.220 So, yeah, that's going to, no, I imagine they're busy cutting each other's throats behind closed doors,
00:37:46.100 but they'll deny it. Because I expected more to like, this is an existential race for this party.
00:37:50.500 It's, are we going to swing to a more moderate left of center under Nenshi, Alberta party, old
00:37:56.980 red Tory sort of look, or are we going to stay true to our NDP principles? And I thought there'd be a lot
00:38:01.540 more fight. And I got a feeling with those first membership numbers, this is just a guess on my
00:38:07.140 part though, is that Nenshi's blown them out of the water so badly already, they realized that any
00:38:11.780 more fighting at this point is going to be detrimental to the party. So let's ride out this race,
00:38:17.140 put across our points, but it's going to be a coronation. That's, that's what I'm thinking is
00:38:21.700 probably the, there's probably two things. One is the left tends to not, not to eat their own as
00:38:28.500 much as the right does, particularly in Alberta. We, we love nothing more than killing ourselves.
00:38:34.420 It's, it's fun. We're guilty of it. Yeah. I'm fewer more guilty than me and you like we do. We,
00:38:41.060 we just love it for very bad reasons, sometimes good reasons, but, uh, the left tend to, yeah,
00:38:46.580 they kind of deal their dirty laundry behind closed doors more. Uh, when they're, if they have a defeated
00:38:51.540 candidate, find them a job or they kind of take care of their own, you know, like, like a union,
00:38:57.380 uh, the right, much less so. But I, I think one of the big issues here is that it, the other
00:39:04.420 campaigns might know that Benji has essentially got this in the bag. So going too hard after him
00:39:10.420 could see you not be on the front benches anymore. It could see you on the outs and also just overall
00:39:16.740 hurt the party. Why, why tarnish the purple paint that they're putting on? Um, Nigel, do you think,
00:39:23.620 uh, like the anecdotal numbers we're hearing out of the NDP is that he's doubled the membership and,
00:39:29.860 you know, if you have doubled the membership, you need to convince, you know, a very small number
00:39:34.100 of existing members at that point to vote for you. Uh, does it look to you like this is, uh,
00:39:40.180 just going to be a purple coronation? Well, be the sensible, be the sensible opinion to hold,
00:39:45.780 wouldn't it? Uh, new members, you have to make sure they vote as well.
00:39:51.380 The old members will, uh, to the degree which he has won the party. It's interesting to note now,
00:40:03.700 having an endorsement from a sitting MLA is not the same as signing up a hundred new members for a vote,
00:40:10.100 but it is interesting to note that, um, Hoffman has got, uh, five existing MLAs and seven who,
00:40:18.580 next MLAs, Ganley eight plus six. And then she has got nine plus two, which isn't bad, but you know,
00:40:24.740 it's not as if everybody is just falling in behind the procession to the throne. So I'm still looking
00:40:31.220 for a vigorous debate and maybe, uh, maybe a second ballot. Most MLA and MP endorsements,
00:40:39.300 99 times out of a hundred mean nothing. Well, look how many MLAs, uh, endorsed. Um, uh,
00:40:46.580 it was the main opponent of Smith in the leadership race, former finance. Oh, Taves. Oh yeah,
00:40:50.420 Travis Taves. Uh, damn near the whole caucus. Smith, uh, started off. She eventually scrapped
00:40:57.700 together one. I think by the end, she had maybe three or four out of, out of the government,
00:41:02.900 large governing caucus. She had a very small number. Um, because most local MPs and MLAs
00:41:09.300 can't carry anyone in their riding. They're, they're just there. Um, they'll be the odd
00:41:15.940 local MLA who can organize and can turn out a constituency, but they're pretty rare in most
00:41:21.940 circumstances. So the endorsements look nice. I think they might matter in the sense of, oh,
00:41:27.060 does this person have support and caucus therefore can, you know, build a team might matter from that,
00:41:33.380 but actual MLAs and MPs, only the rarest of circumstances can actually bring more votes along
00:41:39.620 than their own household. Well, and then she's showing to have a good organizational mechanism.
00:41:44.020 I mean, that's the thing, selling the membership is one thing you got to get them out too,
00:41:46.900 but looking at the well communicated, well organized rallies, he's been holding all over
00:41:52.580 the province, uh, good turnouts for this sort of race and a quiet time for the NDP. Presumably
00:41:58.260 that organizational group also knows that they have to stay in touch and get these people out to vote.
00:42:02.740 So he's showing quite a demonstration of strength. It'll be difficult.
00:42:06.500 And stay tuned. Word is one of the lesser known candidates, uh, that'd probably be Gil McGowan or, um,
00:42:13.460 what's her name? It's going to be Kalahoo Stonehouse.
00:42:16.980 Yeah. Uh, one of those two is likely to drop out and back Hoffman. So are we also now going to see
00:42:23.620 the anybody but Nenshi movement come? We don't have time for it today. I hope so.
00:42:27.860 Stay tuned next week, kids. Well, gentlemen, thank you very much for joining today. I thank all of you
00:42:33.860 for joining us on the pipeline. I hope you've enjoyed yourself and, uh, walk away a little more informed
00:42:39.140 than when you sat down. Uh, remember that the Western standard does not accept any of the federal
00:42:43.700 government's, uh, uh, media bailout money. We rely on, uh, memberships, subscriptions from ordinary
00:42:52.100 people like you. If you're not yet a member of the Western standard, go to westernstandard.news
00:42:56.420 right now, sign up. It's only $10 a month or a hundred dollars a year to get unlimited access
00:43:01.300 to all Western standard content. We publish 40, 50 pieces a day. It's, it's going to, I can't believe
00:43:07.460 how much we actually put up from here, but it's, it's, uh, it's quite something. And we're one of
00:43:11.540 the only publications left in Canada. One of a very, very, very small number that don't take the
00:43:16.580 federal government's media bailout money. So thank you very much for joining us today and all your
00:43:20.580 support and God bless. You can become a Western standard member for just $10 a month or $99 a year
00:43:26.340 for unlimited access.
00:43:37.460 Thank you.
00:43:38.580 Thank you.