00:00:29.220welcome to the cory morgan show and good to see somebody checking in from taber i got a couple of
00:00:33.540new signs of brightening things up down that way on the billboards if you keep your eye open for
00:00:38.340them you know i couldn't make it to the end of the campaign without sending taber a little more love
00:00:42.420uh so yeah only a week and a half or so left in this longest referendum campaign imaginable man
00:00:48.980it's just been a heck of a long stretch but we're getting there and it's going to be interesting
00:00:52.660quebec just finished their uh election and boy talk about a turnover of a government just
00:00:58.180annihilated the CAQ who was in power prior who used to have a huge majority
00:01:02.980changes in the air guys they're interesting political times if nothing
00:01:07.780else a guest coming up in a little while is an engineer named Greg Wilson he
00:01:11.620wrote a piece for CTC Journal talking about the ultimate greenwashing the
00:01:16.540false promise of LEED certification I know it sounds a little dry but actually
00:01:21.280it's important if you wonder about some of the costs of buying homes or condos
00:01:25.600or business and just our general productivity actually it's policies like this that slide under
00:01:30.420the radar that impact you a lot more than you would think so we'll talk to him in a little while
00:01:34.860all right let me get on to what i want to talk about though and it's getting back to quebec
00:01:38.000for those of us old enough to remember in the lead up to the 1995 quebec independence referendum i
00:01:42.820mean the attitude of most albertans at that time was concerned quebec might actually leave the
00:01:47.160federation i mean we had airlines discounts offered and buses and a delegation of westerners
00:01:53.500actually attended a unity rally in quebec shortly before the referendum there was canadian flags
00:01:58.220waving and it was a nice big general love-in while federalists begged quebecers please don't go
00:02:03.500ah the rally was of limited effect uh if it had any at all and quebec came within a hair of
00:02:08.540secession now secessionism is heating up again in quebec as the province elected the pq to a
00:02:13.580majority government again and just obliterated the caq government now the caq was a nationalist
00:02:19.980government that held a position of supporting a sovereign quebec within a united canada
00:02:23.980sound familiar well the pq is overtly secessionist now there were other factors aside from unity in
00:02:28.860play that led to that loss it's undeniable though that quebec just took another step closer
00:02:34.460to moving a having another referendum on secession alberta's response to quebec's pursuit of
00:02:39.420independence over the decades has evolved i mean now we're hearing fewer voices begging please stay0.98
00:02:43.820and more saying don't let the door hit your ass on the way out the frustration is understandable0.98
00:02:48.300Quebec's continually rung concessions out of Ottawa while Albertans have been paying the bill.0.98
00:02:53.700Meanwhile, Quebec's governments have actively fought against Alberta's attempts to get oil and gas products to eastern markets and ports.
00:02:59.620It's time for Alberta's approach to evolve a little further, though.
00:03:02.000Rather than being confrontational, we should be saying, how can we help you with your quest for independence?
00:03:07.120Or even better, how can we work together in the pursuit of independence for both provinces?
00:03:11.300Could you imagine the terror instilled upon the Ottawa establishment if Alberta and Quebec stopped squabbling and actually began working together?
00:03:18.260The Laurentian elites depend on provincial division in order to maintain centralized power.
00:03:22.580Quebec and Alberta working in tandem can shatter that formula.
00:03:26.020Some representatives of Alberta's independence movement felt it would be wise to hold meetings with undisclosed American representatives in Washington.
00:03:32.960Those efforts backfired and have caused mistrust to the independence movement just as a referendum approaches in Alberta.
00:03:38.680Albertans have no interest in leaving Canada just to become a small fish in an even bigger pond.
00:03:44.060Alberta's independence movement should be sending envoys from here to Quebec.
00:03:48.300Learn from the players who've been in the independence game for generations
00:03:50.880and explore ways that our two provinces can work together.
00:03:54.620There's big differences between Quebec and Alberta,
00:03:56.760but there's a whole lot of common ground when it comes to the central government in Ottawa.
00:04:00.340And beyond working with Quebec, we can emulate it.
00:04:03.060Quebec's been incrementally distancing itself from Ottawa for decades.
00:04:06.120Why doesn't Alberta have its own pension plan?
00:04:08.220Why does Alberta not have a full provincial police force?
00:04:11.240Why doesn't Alberta collect its own corporate taxes?
00:04:13.160I mean, those are policy changes we can do.
00:04:16.100Another thing we can do, Alberta's government needs to change in attitude.
00:15:51.100Just to line it up, explain what LEED certification is and how it applies to Canada,
00:15:56.140because that was initially an American sort of standard in development, right?
00:15:59.720Yeah, so it was developed in the late 1990s in the U.S. by the U.S. Green Building Council,
00:16:05.180and it's the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Standard.
00:16:09.300And so it came to Canada in 2003. And it really took over the industry completely. I entered the engineering and design industry in 2012. And it was like the thing that everyone was talking about still at that point. And it really gripped the industry for a few decades. And the resultant of it is a lot of ill performing buildings. And that's basically what the article is about is about how the industry in general and society gets really trapped in these kind of woke
00:16:39.140ideas that don't really have any resulting purpose or longevity to them. And it's really
00:16:46.540of a moment in time where buildings should be built to last forever. And that's really my
00:16:52.040passion with the building and engineering industry is building things that can be fixed and last
00:16:58.460forever. Yeah. And we're seeing some of the things too. I mean, there's the whole nature
00:17:03.640of greenwashing. You know, it's virtue signaling. You want to look like you're doing the environment
00:17:07.500some good and the actual outcome doesn't really seem to matter with some people you you referenced
00:17:11.900a study all the way back from 2008 that found nearly half of those certified buildings actually
00:17:16.620used more energy than their certification promised like it's gone the other direction how's this
00:17:22.060happen it's really funny that 2008 study that you mentioned was actually done by the u.s green
00:17:27.100building council themselves so they themselves admitted in the in the report it's about 22
00:17:32.060percent of the LEED certified buildings uh perform worse than non-LEED certified buildings and i
00:17:38.380think it's hilarious that that's the study that they themselves released so what are the real
00:17:42.540numbers if an independent study were to be done in 2009 a study was sort of redone based on that
00:17:49.580u.s green building council um study and they they reported 28 to 35 percent of LEED certified
00:17:55.660buildings perform worse than their non-certified peers and i should mention too like lead
00:18:01.900certification is extremely expensive to get um the studies show that it ranges from one to 20
00:18:10.380more than a non-lead built buildings and they cost more to maintain um and more in energy costs as
00:18:17.980well so really there's no win at the end of the day and yet we spent millions and millions of
00:18:23.660dollars over decades doing this um to date over 7 000 buildings mostly government buildings have
00:18:29.580been lead certified in canada so uh when we're at a time where a lot of the discussion these days
00:18:36.860i mean a big part of the political discussion is cost of living it's a accessible housing
00:18:41.260it's productivity and these lead certifications actually pressure all three of those categories
00:18:46.860in the wrong direction i mean canada's having a hard time this would be something relatively easy
00:18:51.900to i guess take some of the pressure off so we could be more productive 100 and and now lead
00:18:57.420it's interesting it's sort of shifting to be even more than just greenwashing it's moving more into
00:19:02.940esg and dei kind of realms which i think is really interesting and hilarious frankly but there's a
00:19:09.900lot of discourse and conversation about net zero and this ubiquitous term of net zero and i think
00:19:15.100that is the next really dangerous lead that's coming forward and i think part of my motivation
00:19:21.180to research and write this article is things i'm seeing in the industry day to day and and how much
00:19:26.700damage lead has really done to our buildings and to the industry and now we're talking about net
00:19:32.140zero and everything and i think that's a huge risk factor and i think this goes back to in the
00:19:37.740article i talk about this very sort of innocuous building in winthrop washington i saw it when i
00:19:42.460was on vacation there in may and it's this little building and over its 120 plus year life it's been
00:19:49.020a saloon a school a hospital and now it's the city hall and it wasn't fancy it was built out
00:19:55.420of local wood but it was built to last and i think that's the piece that we have to really
00:20:00.140think about in the industry and in society like what are we building and how are we building
00:20:05.020rather than trying to make it some sort of net zero green monolith um we need to think about
00:20:11.180longevity well then some of the other problem when you get i guess almost omnibus type of uh
00:20:16.540regulations and you can just keep packing more stuff in and packing more stuff in you know that
00:20:20.860some of it starts going well beyond environmental concerns and into social justice concerns that
00:20:27.100really should have absolutely nothing to do with with environmental design yet yet here we are
00:20:32.700yeah and in alberta actually last year um the infrastructure minister
00:20:37.340cancelled all lead requirements on alberta infrastructure projects and they said overnight
00:20:41.980NATO is a 2% cost savings. And what they really highlighted is what you're saying is we already
00:20:47.760have regulations and requirements and building codes, both at all levels, federal, provincial
00:20:53.580and municipal codes. And so this is just layering on top of that. And what the ministry's office
00:21:01.080in Alberta said was that we already address a lot of the energy concerns and energy consumption
00:21:08.120and warmth and lighting and all these sorts of considerations in the building code and in the
00:21:14.900energy code of the building code specifically. So LEED is really redundant. And an architect I
00:21:19.940interviewed that's based out of Washington said the same thing, that LEED costs about $250,000
00:21:25.340for a municipal building to attach the necessary paperwork and consultants that you need to get
00:21:31.720the LEED certification to get that illustrious plaque on the door of a building for really
00:21:37.220nothing. And so many of the concepts already are included in other regulations and code. So
00:21:44.640it really is completely redundant. And I really worry that this net zero conversation that's
00:21:49.780happening that I see in the industry and in our dear governments at the federal level is really
00:21:55.560concerning for what it means for the cost of construction, which is skyrocketing. It's the
00:21:59.860highest it's ever been. And we, the consumers and the homeowners and dream homeowners are all
00:22:06.240suffering because of that sort of top-down pressure well and another area that sort of
00:22:11.520ironically led to some some bad outcomes you put as an example a roof collapse where they'd put a
00:22:19.240you know a living roof a green roof on the place fortunately it happened on a weekend but that
00:22:24.840really could have actually led to deaths and it was just again where they obviously overlooked
00:22:29.200architectural reality and jumped headfirst into, you know, planting a crop on a roof, basically.
00:22:37.000Yeah, and I come from a very practical, I mean, I was raised by very practical parents, thankfully.
00:22:42.920So I come to the industry and to design from a very practical perspective. And the green roofs
00:22:48.760were huge as part of LEED because you got so many points. And it really was a system of gamification
00:22:54.080of design and not practicality or reality. And green roofs, there's another example. The one
00:23:00.000you mentioned is in Illinois, the Aquascape building, and that collapsed in 2011. And in
00:23:06.0602011, the John Harper Library in Waterloo built an addition with a green roof, and it's been
00:23:11.740leaking since. And now, as of even, I think, August, they had a meeting. The underside of the
00:23:18.340roof is covered in tarps to redirect all the water that's coming through the green roof onto the
00:23:23.700books and damaging the books in the library. So it just is these kinds of things, concepts
00:23:28.260that aren't rooted in reality or practicality. And like I mentioned, the architect that I
00:23:33.440interviewed, his number one thing is get rid of all of these flat roofs. Just put a sloped roof
00:23:37.720on every building and that fixes everything. Solves the problem. That kind of practicality,
00:23:42.920that's it. Yeah, there were sloped roofs on medieval buildings. I mean, they knew that then
00:23:48.180and we seem to have forgotten it since uh you know getting almost again into the realm of the gross
00:23:54.340but it's not the the massive architecture aspect but it's one of those little things that again
00:23:58.580becomes costly you mentioned you know that these waterless urinals and i've run across this those
00:24:03.540in a few places too and everything again the concept sounds sound i guess but when you get
00:24:08.500into them i just know from using them it tends to stink pretty bad in there those don't mask
00:24:13.460urinal use odors very effectively but you've also found that they actually are worse for0.70
00:24:18.500the environment quite often than than if you just run water through the darn things to begin with0.99
00:24:23.300yeah the the waterless urinals i think are like the key sort of stupidity of the lead gamification0.95
00:24:30.980system because what better way to get points than to use no water at all and so in a lot of cases
00:24:36.580they retrofitted these urinals um in place which is i guess fine and dandy because they sell the
00:24:41.460water hookups for the urinals but it's really dangerous in buildings that were new that they
00:24:46.740didn't put any of the plumbing attachments for actual use of urinals where you need water flow
00:24:53.220and so those buildings are in a world of hurt and it's funny because again this gamification and
00:24:57.860kind of green washing and making everything kind of work even though it doesn't in a lot of cases
00:25:03.140in these waterless urinals they have to pour hydrochloric acid into the urinals at night often
00:25:09.140because they don't want to, you know, pretend that it's not working. So under the guise of
00:25:12.600everything green, they do it at night, and they are pouring hydrochloric acid to break up this
00:25:18.620Truvite that builds up in the traps and in the piping of these waterless urinals, because there's
00:25:23.080no flushing action to get rid of the urine. So it is kind of a gross, kind of a hilarious
00:25:28.500example of how silly all of this LEED certification gets. Well, getting to the positive kind of,
00:25:36.660I mean, you noted from Alberta's infrastructure minister was talking about reducing some of these things and cutting it back and equated it, say that we could potentially even build a couple more schools if we just got rid of these ridiculous requirements.
00:25:49.500So do you think some governments are finally at least realizing this reality and backing off on some of this then?
00:25:54.740I think so. And I think there's people are seeing the practicality.
00:25:58.220I guess I come from the industry that we as industry professionals need to be speaking out about it, too.
00:26:04.220and we need to be focusing on practical solutions.
00:26:07.940And especially with the cost of construction,
00:26:09.720we need to really be thinking long-term
00:26:26.740The research that I did and the research that's out there
00:26:29.420says that it's much, much more than a 2% cost savings.
00:26:32.620It's upwards of 20% cost savings in some instances.
00:26:35.860So I think when governments and institutions see that, it kind of is a no-brainer,
00:26:41.740especially with all of this research that's coming out from even the lead group itself,
00:26:46.100the U.S. Green Building Council, that the buildings don't work.
00:26:48.760They don't function the way they should.
00:26:51.240Yeah, and we don't have to return to, you know, Soviet-style brutalist architecture
00:26:55.560of just having purely functional concrete boxes that'll last forever.
00:26:59.300But I think if the private market and architects and builders were allowed to just go with things, they could probably build some aesthetically nice places that would last a long time if they didn't have to sweat all these weird lead requirements.
00:27:12.760And that's the sad part for me is that in often cases and the architect I spoke to, you know, and I see it's in my day to day life in the industry is we're using products because they're green, not because they are long lasting or productive.
00:27:28.080You know, we used to build buildings that are brick and masonry and steel and concrete that are amazing materials that last forever.
00:27:34.880And now we're using materials and coatings that are, quote, green or sustainable, but they don't have that same level of longevity.
00:27:42.200And we used to build buildings to be comfortable for the occupants.
00:27:46.420You know, we used to build buildings in different shapes so that everyone had a operable window and natural light.
00:27:51.660And now we build these square monoliths that we put super expensive HVAC systems in and claim that they're green and claim that they're sustainable.
00:28:00.300And we really need to go back to looking at how humans used to live and building buildings that last forever.
00:28:06.840The architect that I talked to, he said that public buildings should be designed to last at least 100 years.