Western Standard - February 18, 2022


WATCH: JCCF on Emergencies Act


Episode Stats

Length

28 minutes

Words per Minute

143.84302

Word Count

4,127

Sentence Count

196

Hate Speech Sentences

4


Summary

In this episode, we discuss the Emergencies Act, which was passed by Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau in response to the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States. We also discuss the situation in the Truckers' Blockade in Ottawa, Canada, and how the government is handling the situation.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I'm Melanie Risden with the Western Standard and we are going to do a bit of a dive into
00:00:14.400 the Emergencies Act that has been invoked in Canada. And joining me for a discussion
00:00:21.340 on the Emergencies Act is John Carpe. He is the president and a lawyer with Justice Centre
00:00:27.940 for Constitutional Freedoms. Thanks for joining us, John. Glad to be with you.
00:00:34.020 So we are looking at, I know I was just listening, the MPs are going to be debating the Emergencies
00:00:41.500 Act now in the House of Commons. They've agreed to an extended sitting and they are going to go
00:00:48.000 till midnight tonight, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. They are going to be sitting through the entire
00:00:55.180 weekend to debate the Emergencies Act. And it looks like we are going to see a vote coming on
00:01:02.320 Monday, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, which will be six o'clock our time here in Calgary.
00:01:09.320 So, you know, we thought it would be a great idea to get into the actual Emergencies Act,
00:01:17.740 which used to be the War Measures Act and has been sort of ratified and updated to now
00:01:25.380 what we refer to as the Emergencies Act. And I really think, John, there's a lot of Canadians who
00:01:30.900 really don't know much about this at all because we've really never had to live through something
00:01:38.620 like this outside of 1970 when Trudeau Senior, ironically, brought it in for the FLQ October
00:01:48.100 crisis. So let's talk a little bit about it. Well, as you said, the Canadians over 60 might
00:01:56.380 remember the October crisis in 1970. And that situation was the former Prime Minister Pierre
00:02:04.100 Elliott Trudeau invoked the War Measures Act to deal with violent terrorists in Quebec.
00:02:11.780 We had a situation throughout from the early 1960s right on through to 1970. You had the Front de
00:02:17.860 Liberation du Québec, the Quebec Liberation Front, or the FLQ. And they were putting bombs in cars,
00:02:25.700 putting bombs in mailboxes. They put a bomb in the house of Montreal Mayor Jean Drapeau. And
00:02:34.660 they just got worse and worse. And then in 1970, they actually kidnapped British Trade Commissioner
00:02:41.220 James Cross. And they kidnapped Quebec cabinet minister Pierre Laporte and later murdered him.
00:02:48.260 And then the Pierre Elliott Trudeau invoked the War Measures Act, suspended civil liberties,
00:02:54.980 sent in the troops to primarily Montreal, but throughout Quebec, there were guns and soldiers with guns in
00:03:03.140 the streets of Montreal and Ottawa, other Canadian cities, but special focus on Quebec.
00:03:11.380 And what happened was they arrested hundreds and hundreds of people without a warrant. Anybody who
00:03:19.860 was suspected of having anything to do with the FLQ was arrested. Some people were detained without bail,
00:03:26.740 temporarily. Most of the people that were arrested were released without charge after some questioning.
00:03:34.740 But there's a definite violation of civil liberties. And the debate continues to the present
00:03:41.140 about historians. You know, was Pierre Elliott Trudeau correct to have invoked the War Measures Act?
00:03:48.420 But one thing was very clear, whether it was right or wrong,
00:03:50.820 I don't have a strong opinion either way. Pierre Elliott Trudeau in 1970 was dealing with violent Marxist
00:04:01.140 separatists who wanted to overthrow the democratically elected government of Quebec and create a socialist,
00:04:09.140 independent Quebec that would be allied with the Soviet Union and Cuba. And so Pierre Elliott Trudeau was
00:04:17.220 dealing with violent people doing bombings and kidnapping and murder.
00:04:27.380 Yeah, absolutely. And so when you're looking at what happened back then, and you know, I have this
00:04:34.900 statement where Pierre Elliott Trudeau said he declared that law and order was more important than
00:04:41.780 civil liberties. And, you know, at the time I think there were probably people who were affected, who
00:04:47.540 were scared for their lives, who were scared for their, you know, their neighbors, their communities.
00:04:53.460 But what's happening here and what's happening now with the trucker occupation in Ottawa, the fact that,
00:05:03.460 you know, there seems to be an overwhelming amount of evidence, you know, floating through social media,
00:05:11.700 everywhere that this has been peaceful. I know you and I had talked about the fact that
00:05:18.500 I don't believe there has been any criminal arrests to this point.
00:05:25.540 To the best of my knowledge, and you know, I'm in Calgary, not in Ottawa, but based on what I'm hearing from
00:05:32.740 people on the ground, the Justice Centre has two lawyers there in Ottawa, and we're hearing from other
00:05:40.260 people as well. To my knowledge, in the past three weeks, there's not been a single
00:05:45.220 arrest of a trucker for doing anything criminal. Now, the Ottawa police have claimed that the truckers
00:05:54.100 are breaking Section 430 of the criminal code, which prohibits the
00:05:59.380 obstruction or interference with the lawful use of property or obstructing people from lawfully
00:06:09.940 lawfully using and enjoying property. Now, I think it's a pretty flimsy charge. But here's the thing.
00:06:20.500 The police haven't even charged truckers with the obstruction or interference with the lawful use
00:06:29.780 and enjoyment of property, which is a criminal code offence. Police have not charged truckers
00:06:35.060 with criminal activity. And at the same time, we hear of government seizing or freezing bank accounts,
00:06:43.060 alleging that this money is going to fund criminal activity. But there is no criminal activity in Ottawa
00:06:52.100 when the truckers, no truckers are even being arrested. Although I did just get off the phone with
00:06:59.700 with one of our lawyers in Ottawa. And one of our clients has been arrested as of a few minutes ago.
00:07:07.220 So this would be at about two forty five p.m. Mountain time, four forty five p.m. Ottawa time.
00:07:14.020 So as you and I are discussing this, there might be arrests taking place.
00:07:18.660 But that would be now on on February 17th, not in the past three weeks.
00:07:24.260 Do we have any idea what they have been arrested for? Has that been disclosed?
00:07:30.100 Well, I think what the federal government's trying to do with the declaring that a public
00:07:34.580 order emergency exists, it is now easier to arrest people than what it was last week when the public
00:07:43.460 order emergency did not exist. Let's talk about. Yeah. Sorry about that, John. Let's let's talk about
00:07:50.740 that. Let's talk about the the premise, the the threshold to bring in the Emergencies Act.
00:07:56.740 What needs to be declared? What needs to be happening in order to bring in this act?
00:08:02.660 So the Emergencies Act, which anybody you can Google it online quite easily, Emergencies Act.
00:08:12.020 And Section three says that a national emergency exists if there is a serious threat to the life,
00:08:21.220 health or safety of Canadians, or if there's a serious threat to the ability of the government of
00:08:27.860 Canada to protect our security, sovereignty and territorial integrity.
00:08:37.380 And so it's one of those two things, serious threat to life, health or safety or a serious threat to the security,
00:08:46.980 sovereignty or territorial integrity. And that other existing federal provincial law
00:08:54.260 law is not adequate to deal with the problem. And this just falls on its face when you look at,
00:09:02.100 there is no national emergency right now when you consider that some residents of Ottawa, not all of them,
00:09:11.300 but some residents of Ottawa have been inconvenienced in the past three weeks by truckers,
00:09:17.300 which are probably breaking some of the parking regulations. And there might be some breaking of
00:09:23.780 provincial traffic laws. I don't know. And it's not an admission. But so far that the city and the
00:09:32.260 province and the federal government are not even using existing laws. We don't have truckers arrested
00:09:39.780 under Section 430 of the Criminal Code for interfering with the lawful use of property.
00:09:47.700 I'm not aware of there being traffic tickets being issued or parking infractions.
00:09:53.140 So the existing laws have not proven to be inadequate because they're not even being tried.
00:09:58.900 So and moreover, a bunch of peaceful protesters that are causing some congestion and some inconvenience,
00:10:06.420 that is not a serious threat to the ability of the government of Canada to preserve sovereignty,
00:10:14.260 security and territorial integrity. I mean, it's just ludicrous. It's insane to pretend
00:10:21.300 that peacefully protesting truckers constitute a national emergency.
00:10:25.380 Right. And so the threshold is nowhere close to even being met to bring this act in. And when the act
00:10:38.340 is invoked, it gives the government extraordinary powers.
00:10:46.100 Well, it does. And in the order that has been issued by cabinet, and I'm glancing down, I've got it
00:10:51.620 printed out. I'll go through what the federal government says the emergency is constituted of.
00:10:58.980 What constitutes the emergency, according to Prime Minister Trudeau, is the continuing blockades
00:11:06.580 by persons and motor vehicles at various locations throughout Canada. Well, my understanding, and I stand
00:11:14.820 to be corrected, is that all the border blockades have been ended and that goods and persons are
00:11:21.140 flowing back and forth across Canada-US border. So the continuing blockades is one of the things that
00:11:27.780 constitutes an emergency. It refers to the continuing threats to oppose measures to remove the blockades,
00:11:34.980 including by force. Okay, blockades are gone. Downtown Ottawa is not being blockaded.
00:11:41.460 Next point, the adverse effects on the Canadian economy. Well, yeah, I guess there were some
00:11:48.500 minimal impacts for a few days when the border at Coutts and Windsor and Emerson, Manitoba were
00:11:55.940 blockaded, but that's gone now. It's over. Next, the adverse effects resulting from the impacts of the
00:12:01.780 blockades on Canada's relationship with its trading partners, including the United States. Okay, no longer an
00:12:07.220 issue. Borders are reopened. Next, the breakdown in the distribution chain and availability of essential
00:12:14.260 goods and services and resources caused by the existing blockades. Okay, there are no blockades.
00:12:21.140 Furthermore, the two years of lockdown measures that we've had have really harmed the distribution
00:12:26.740 chain and availability of essential goods, but I digress. Next, the federal government says that
00:12:36.580 what causes the emergency is the potential for an increase in the level of unrest and violence
00:12:43.540 that would further threaten the safety and security of Canadians. So here they're asserting that there is
00:12:49.060 already a level of violence because they're talking about the potential for an increase in the level of
00:12:56.740 violence. So where's the violence? There is no violence. I mean, this is just completely false.
00:13:02.740 Well, and it seems interesting to me as well that laws are being enacted or this, you know, act is being
00:13:09.220 invoked on a premise that it could become something, right? You know, like that, uh, it, it seems like
00:13:20.180 that's a bit of a stretch as well to to sort of insinuate that we have to do this just in case it does go
00:13:29.860 this way, right? Uh, because I think bringing in this act is, as we've mentioned, I mean, it is reserved for
00:13:38.580 the absolute last resort, you know, wartime.
00:13:42.980 Well, yeah, like, like, for example, 52 years ago, when you had these, uh, a terrorist organization
00:13:49.380 that was putting bombs in mailboxes, putting bombs in cars, putting bombs in homes, uh, they, they put a bomb
00:13:57.620 in the Montreal stock exchange that blew up in 1969 and injured dozens of people. And then they kidnapped
00:14:05.780 government officials, uh, held them for ransom. I mean, that was a situation where, again, it's
00:14:11.700 debatable. There are people who say that, uh, the, the predecessor of the NDP, uh, the, the CCF at that
00:14:18.260 time, no, sorry, it was the NDP in 1970, the NDP was against, uh, Pierre Elliott Trudeau invoking the
00:14:26.500 War Measures Act to deal with violent terrorists. And now today we've got the NDP, uh, that is supporting
00:14:33.620 the younger Trudeau in using emergency powers to deal with peaceful truckers, uh, when there are
00:14:40.100 no reports of violence. If there were reports of violence, I have no doubt that the government
00:14:45.220 funded media, which is not just the CDC, but also, uh, the national post, the golden mail, uh, global news,
00:14:53.380 uh, every government funded media outlet would be publicizing the violence. If there was violence,
00:15:01.060 we've seen no violence in three weeks. So this is just a perversion of the law to, for the federal
00:15:07.380 government to pretend that there was some, uh, threat of violence. John, do you think that they're
00:15:13.700 using this to justify something? Do you, why, you know, what, what's your thoughts on that? Or do you
00:15:20.900 want to speculate? I, I think what's driving this is that the truckers are a political embarrassment
00:15:29.300 to the federal government. Uh, I suspect that prime minister Trudeau is more strongly committed
00:15:36.580 to keeping in place the, uh, the violations of our charter rights and freedoms by vaccine
00:15:43.060 passports, vaccine mandates, lockdown measures. I think that the, most of the premiers, uh, certainly
00:15:49.060 Jason Kenney in Alberta, uh, even premier Ford in Ontario is now making noises about how,
00:15:54.020 oh, we all hate vaccine passports and we've got to just move on. Uh, we've got premier mole in
00:16:00.580 Saskatchewan, uh, first out of the gates talking about dropping vaccine passports. So I think you've
00:16:06.740 got premiers that are more flexible, but I think the prime minister is very strongly committed to the,
00:16:14.020 uh, restrictions on, uh, air travel for people that have not taken the COVID shots.
00:16:21.140 And so the truckers protest is an embarrassment for the prime minister. Uh, he doesn't want to
00:16:26.100 lose face by meeting with them. He doesn't want to lose face by, uh, dropping these mandates,
00:16:33.060 which if the prime minister did that, there's a pretty good chance that most of the truckers would
00:16:36.420 leave. Uh, perhaps, uh, some truckers would stay, you know, insisting on the removal of vaccine
00:16:42.500 passports in every province. I don't know. Uh, but if Trudeau said, we're getting rid of the,
00:16:48.740 uh, the federal vaccine mandates, uh, I suspect most of these truckers would be out of town, uh,
00:16:56.980 within 24 hours is my guess. He doesn't want to do that. So now there's this whole drama with
00:17:02.900 pretending that we're dealing with something violent when we're not and invoking the, uh, uh,
00:17:08.500 emergency powers. That's what I think is going on.
00:17:11.700 Mm-hmm now I know when we were talking about, uh, some of the, some of the circumstances that
00:17:18.340 would be, that would be needed to bring in the emergencies act. And you had mentioned about the,
00:17:23.460 um, you know, the, the sovereignty, uh, that's a threat to our sovereignty. And, uh, I know that,
00:17:30.020 uh, one of the things I've heard in the, in the explanation is with the guns that were seized by,
00:17:35.940 uh, or seized from a small group that was working independently from the main protesters in Coutts.
00:17:43.860 In fact, uh, I was speaking with, um, a lot of the RCMP on site, as well as a lot of the organizers
00:17:51.780 that were involved in the protest at Coutts, uh, and, and was told repeatedly that the, the main
00:17:59.380 group of protesters that started the, the, um, blockade down in Coutts had no idea who the small
00:18:07.620 band of people were. Had they, they weren't associated with them. They didn't know their names.
00:18:12.420 Uh, but regardless, uh, there was guns seized, uh, from this small group. And now this group has been,
00:18:19.700 you know, I've listened that they have been sort of tied to what they're saying, organized groups with
00:18:26.100 radicalized ideology to overthrow the government. You know, like it, it, it sounds like they're,
00:18:34.980 they're, you know, using, using that as, as a, as an example of why these, uh, this emergency act is
00:18:47.700 necessary at this time. What are your thoughts on that? Well, I think the, the federal government is
00:18:53.060 desperately, uh, grasping at straws to try to justify, uh, using the emergencies act and giving
00:19:01.700 the, uh, federal government broad new powers to, to seize funds in, uh, in bank accounts.
00:19:08.260 And we, we can get into that in a minute. So they're desperately looking for justification.
00:19:13.540 Uh, even though the, uh, the CBC and the other government funded media
00:19:17.700 are not, I think they're not conveying accurately what thousands and thousands of videos from Ottawa
00:19:24.260 show is, is a bunch of peaceful truckers that are shoveling snow, picking up garbage,
00:19:29.780 uh, setting up bouncy castles for kids, uh, feeding the homeless, uh, cleaning, uh, cleaning war memorials,
00:19:37.860 et cetera. So I think most people know that the, that this is a peaceful protest.
00:19:42.420 Yes. It's causing some, uh, uh, inconvenience, perhaps even hardship for some people in Ottawa,
00:19:50.020 but it's peaceful. So now the government wants to find, uh, caches of guns so that they can,
00:19:57.460 uh, try and justify the emergency. I'd like to see the evidence. Uh, I'd like to see the details on,
00:20:05.700 you know, where were these guns found, where they found on somebody's private property that,
00:20:10.500 that happened to live close to, uh, where, where the people were protesting, uh, at the border point
00:20:17.620 of entry near Coots and who owned these guns, but were there actually any plans, uh, on the part of
00:20:25.540 anybody to make use of any of these guns? Because even if they found a bunch of guns on somebody's
00:20:30.180 private property close to where the protest was, that doesn't mean the protest is violent. Uh, there's
00:20:36.020 a lot of people in rural Alberta, small town Alberta and the major urban centers. There's a lot of people
00:20:41.860 who happen to own firearms. So if they found some firearms on private property, I'd like to see what
00:20:47.620 the link is to the protests, if any. And furthermore, when they talk about, oh, some dark ideology, I mean,
00:20:55.220 what, what is that? Uh, somebody who disagrees with a prime minister is, uh, is, is going to be, uh,
00:21:01.140 found to be ideologically dangerous. Uh, the absence of details, uh, provided thus far by the federal
00:21:07.380 government speaks volumes. I would agree. And, and speaking of the, the evidence that you said you
00:21:14.740 would want to see, um, I, I have not heard, uh, either way, and perhaps this has been released at
00:21:20.580 this point, but whether any of those guns were, um, illegal, whether they were unregistered, uh, I don't,
00:21:26.740 I don't have those details, uh, as of yet, but I do plan to, to try to get that information.
00:21:33.700 Uh, and so, uh, you know, I, I, I think my last question to you would be as a lawyer, as a lawyer,
00:21:40.260 uh, who has worked, you know, for the JCCF, you are committed to, uh, you know, upholding Canada's
00:21:47.620 constitution and our rights, uh, as, as, as Canadians. What, what are your thoughts on
00:21:56.420 the slippery slope that this brings about in our free country in, in Canada? What,
00:22:05.060 what can you speak to with regard to this emergencies act and what that, what that can
00:22:10.580 bring in the future? Well, dictators always need an enemy. Uh, historically, you know, the, the
00:22:18.020 communists, uh, would take away all your rights and freedoms in order to protect you and save you
00:22:23.860 from capitalist exploitation. Uh, Hitler sees power in part by talking about how scary the communists
00:22:31.380 were and he was going to protect you and save Germany from communism. Uh, every dictator is,
00:22:38.180 always has an enemy that they vilify and no government ever takes away rights and freedoms without, uh,
00:22:45.460 proffering some pretext, some cause of, of some kind. They're always putting forward, uh, some,
00:22:53.940 something that, that sounds like a good reason to take your rights and freedoms away. Um, I've heard
00:23:00.020 from people that lived through, uh, the, uh, Pinochet seizing power in Chile in 1973. Prior to 1973, Chile was a
00:23:09.780 functioning democracy. They had free and fair elections. They had changes in government and
00:23:15.380 they had freedom of the press and they were a free society and a free country. And then all of a sudden
00:23:20.580 in 1973, uh, Pinochet in the military, they seized power and people in Chile were amazed. Like, like,
00:23:27.540 how, how did this happen? Because they were quite confident that they had a strong, solid, functioning
00:23:34.740 democracy. And yet that democracy disappeared and it did not return until the 1990s. So they had 20 years
00:23:42.980 of dictatorship without elections in Chile. And I think in Canada, what's happening right now is
00:23:50.100 terrifying when you have a federal government that is freezing bank accounts, um, without there being
00:23:56.980 any criminal activity in Ottawa. How do we know that? Well, because in the last three weeks, no trucker has been
00:24:03.700 charged or arrested for, for breaking the law. So there's no criminal activity in Ottawa. And yet
00:24:09.620 the government is busy freezing bank accounts by saying that, that, that Canadians that gave money
00:24:15.700 to the freedom convoy, that they were financing criminal activity. So, I mean, what, what is happening
00:24:22.580 here is so ruthless and aggressive that you have to look at these, uh, historical comparisons and you have
00:24:28.820 to start looking at, at people like, like Franco in Spain or Pinochet in Chile or, or any number of
00:24:35.060 dictators when a government is seizing property or even just freezing, uh, a bank accounts without taking
00:24:41.860 the money, uh, without any valid basis for that. That's absolutely terrifying. And that, that, that,
00:24:49.780 that, that the, that we would invoke the emergencies act to crush a peaceful protest, uh, in, in Ottawa.
00:25:00.340 Uh, this, this is absolutely frightening and we are potentially on the verge of, of, of seeing our
00:25:07.220 democracy go further down the drain than what it already has been.
00:25:11.140 Mm-hmm. Well, as mentioned, the MPs are going to be debating this for the next, uh, four days,
00:25:19.220 almost nonstop. They are, uh, scheduled to be, uh, in parliament from 7am till midnight or, uh, until
00:25:27.940 nobody stands up to, to speak in the evening. Uh, and that's going to be debated right through the
00:25:33.700 weekend, uh, through the day on Monday. And again, it looks like the vote is set for, uh, 8pm
00:25:41.140 Eastern standard time on Monday, six o'clock our time. So I think all eyes will be on that vote
00:25:49.140 come Monday. And, uh, I think as Canadians, we need to, we need to hope that our, you know,
00:25:57.140 our government is, is able to avoid what I think you're, you're very right in being concerned about.
00:26:06.020 People should contact their MPs and people that now is a great time also to exercise your charter
00:26:14.660 freedoms. Uh, whether you live in, in Ottawa or Montreal or Toronto or Calgary, uh, regardless of
00:26:20.580 where you are, uh, if there are, if there is a peaceful rally taking place in the city where you
00:26:25.540 live, it would be worthwhile to exercise peacefully our charter rights and freedoms, because I think that
00:26:31.940 the MPs, uh, many of them will be influenced by seeing peaceful protests all across Canada
00:26:40.100 against this abuse of the emergencies act when there is no emergency. And so I would encourage
00:26:47.460 all people to, uh, to protest peacefully and go to peaceful rallies and exercise our charter freedoms of,
00:26:54.180 of, uh, expression association and peaceful assembly.
00:26:57.300 Yeah, we will be, uh, actually putting a story up if it's not up already, but, uh, we will have a story
00:27:03.700 on, uh, the Western standard website about, uh, options for you to participate in peaceful protests
00:27:10.020 and in Calgary, uh, and we're going to sort of dig around and try to find, uh, find as many as we can to,
00:27:17.220 to, to reference for people to get out. And, and as John says, uh, you know, uh, message your MPs,
00:27:23.140 um, uh, you know, communicate your thoughts and feelings as a Canadian citizen, because ultimately
00:27:28.900 these decisions will impact all of us for, uh, many years to come. So, uh, John, I want to thank
00:27:35.540 you for taking the time to sort of walk us through a little deeper into the emergencies act and, uh, and
00:27:42.580 what we could be facing. And again, our eyes will be on that vote come Monday at 8 PM Eastern time.
00:27:49.460 Well, thanks Melanie. Talk to you again.
00:27:52.500 Algodex is owned by Algonada. This is great new technology just coming online now in the digital
00:28:01.140 currency world. Algodex is a great way for you to use the digital currency Algorand, uh, in your
00:28:08.260 day-to-day transactions. Can you imagine a world where you don't have to buy a cup of coffee using
00:28:13.700 a federal dollar and you don't even have to use the American federal dollar. You don't have to use the
00:28:18.020 euro or the pound sterling. You can use real money, uh, digital currencies, uh, that are not at the
00:28:24.020 beck and call of governments and inflation. Algodex is making, uh, digital currencies usable in a day-to-day
00:28:31.460 basis.