What an independent Alberta would look like
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
150.24477
Summary
Catherine Kowalczyk is a Calgary lawyer, but is now actually running for the Independence Party of Alberta leadership. In this episode, we chat with Catherine about why she decided to run for the party, and why she believes Alberta should vote Yes in a referendum on independence.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello, I'm Melanie Rizdin with the Western Standard. Thanks for joining me.
00:00:03.680
Also joining me today is Catherine Kowalczyk. She is a Calgary lawyer, but is now actually
00:00:09.060
going to be running for the Independence Party of Alberta leadership. So we're going to just
00:00:15.320
chat with Catherine a little bit today, and we're going to find out a little bit more about,
00:00:19.940
first and foremost, what Alberta independence looks like and why this is near and dear to
00:00:26.200
your heart, Catherine. Well, thanks, Melanie, for having me here today. First of all, as you know,
00:00:32.540
I've been quite involved in the freedom movement and quite outspoken the past few years in particular
00:00:39.320
with respect to the government mandates and policies that have come out with respect to
00:00:45.160
lockdowns, masking and COVID-19 in general. And that is really what motivated me. That and,
00:00:53.780
quite frankly and honestly, the fear for my children's future. You know, I've been paying
00:01:01.700
attention for quite some time now, even prior to COVID, about the trajectory of our, where our
00:01:08.300
society is going. And quite honestly, I don't personally agree with where it's going in many
00:01:17.320
respects. And so I felt that it was necessary to pivot from my advocacy, not necessarily as a lawyer,
00:01:26.900
because I'm still a full-time lawyer, and I'm still advocating from that perspective. But I realized
00:01:32.700
that I needed to do something different, which included, in my belief, a political solution.
00:01:39.580
Because right now, what the Independence Party is advocating for primarily is a referendum on
00:01:48.580
independence and giving back to Albertans a voice so that they are the decision makers in their own
00:01:55.840
destiny. And that really appealed to me. You know, I wasn't always necessarily in favor of a separatist
00:02:04.240
type of movement. In fact, I really didn't give it much thought. But earlier this year, I became
00:02:11.800
informed and realized that under the Clarity Act, that this, this referendum on independence is a legal
00:02:22.140
and viable option to increase our negotiating power, so that Alberta can achieve the things that we've been
00:02:29.700
trying to achieve, which is a fair deal within Confederation in Canada for decades.
00:02:35.640
Now, you've been a practicing lawyer for 20 years in family law. And I know you and I have spoken in the
00:02:43.460
past, we chatted about a ruling that came down for one of your clients with regard to he was he was
00:02:51.540
looking to protect his child from being vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine as his wife would would have liked to
00:03:01.040
have seen. So, so I'm, I'm guessing that as a lawyer and watching some of those situations and cases unfold and
00:03:10.080
seeing seeing these rulings, that's sort of the background that you're coming from the idea that you're
00:03:15.700
watching, you know, our justice system be affected or, or, you know, some would say infected. So, you know,
00:03:24.980
let's talk a little bit about things from the legal side of your perspective.
00:03:30.900
Yeah, certainly, you're, you're absolutely right. And in fact, when that decision and it was a father,
00:03:36.680
a separated father, divorced father, who was trying to, well, his position was he wanted to wait and see
00:03:42.200
before vaccinating the children. They weren't, they had received previous vaccinations. So it wasn't
00:03:49.220
that he wasn't in favor of vaccination, but he wanted to wait and see so that he could make an
00:03:54.500
informed decision. And his ex-wife obviously thought otherwise. And the children did have some
00:04:01.980
reservations around it too, of course, but you know, children are children and, and they don't
00:04:07.440
necessarily know all the facts. So when that case, when that ruling came out, and that ruling was
00:04:13.440
really indicative of what had been going on across the country up until that point from a family law
00:04:19.520
perspective. Now, I've been practicing primarily in family law exclusively for the past eight, eight or
00:04:25.180
nine years. But I do have other, I did practice in other areas of law before that. But, you know, when I
00:04:32.020
chose family law, thing that appealed to me about family law was the true human to human connection
00:04:39.540
and really helping families who are going through really challenging circumstances and navigating that.
00:04:45.560
And there's nothing more that I dislike is ending up in a courtroom to have to, to have to litigate an
00:04:53.900
issue. But it is necessary in some cases. But what was pivotal for me was the ruling in that case
00:05:01.000
not only was the mother given the ability, the authority to vaccinate the children, she was also
00:05:10.640
given primary health decision making over all healthcare related matters, which was up until
00:05:16.400
that point, the parties had not had a previous history of not being able to make those decisions
00:05:22.320
together as joint guardians and joint decision makers for the children. So the judge ruled in that
00:05:29.280
way as well. And also, very disturbingly, the justice ruled that my client and he was not allowed to permit any
00:05:38.640
third party to ever discuss COVID-19 or the vaccinations with the children again. And, you know, as we've seen in
00:05:47.280
other cases, in other cases, like, you know, Justice Germain's ruling earlier, that compelled speech, that's very
00:05:58.720
problematic in a democracy. And, and I think that we, there's a group of us lawyers, but for myself in
00:06:06.720
particular, I was really optimistic at the beginning of COVID that the courts were going to be the sober,
00:06:14.160
um, reasoned, uh, decision maker with respect to the government overreach. But the absolute opposite
00:06:25.200
has occurred. And so knowing that the likelihood of getting a fair result, a just result in the courts was
00:06:34.160
unlikely. Um, that's really, um, another thing that's motivated me to shift, um, into, into a political
00:06:42.240
realm to see if we can make some changes where it counts. And that is to become the, the lawmakers.
00:06:48.800
Mm-hmm. Now you, uh, had sort of banded together and sort of co-founded Lawyers for Truth. Uh,
00:06:55.920
is it more of an advocacy group or were you, uh, with that group representing people? Um, what was,
00:07:01.840
what was happening with that group? Uh, well, Lawyers for Truth is not a law firm. We're very clear
00:07:06.000
about that. And we're a group of people, lawyers and other professionals who came together as a result
00:07:11.760
of the mandatory masking right at the, uh, at the very beginning. And, um, we don't, uh, Lawyers for
00:07:18.560
Truth. So Lawyers for Truth does not take on any legal cases per se. We refer people and connect
00:07:24.880
people to lawyers across Alberta and across the country who are either facing fines, employment,
00:07:33.120
issues with respect to wanting to maintain their bodily autonomy, um, and also family law issues as,
00:07:41.120
as well. Right. And so with this background, 20 years of, of working within the law, seeing how it is
00:07:50.800
shifting or how it has shifted over these couple of years, um, would you say that's, that's a good
00:07:56.800
qualifier for you to become a leader in Alberta? I think so. Yeah. I, I, I think that, you know,
00:08:04.640
as much as lawyers have, you know, people have their opinions about lawyers and, you know, I often say
00:08:09.920
to people that I speak, you don't hold that against me. I do think that, you know, lawyers go to school
00:08:15.360
and are trained in a unique way. And we're trained to know, understand the legislation and really do a
00:08:23.920
thorough cost benefit risk analysis for their client. You know, we're trained to look at all
00:08:30.960
angles of a particular issue, regardless of what it is to help our clients make their own informed
00:08:37.920
decision about the instructions that we receive. And, you know, I'm very, very proud of my practice
00:08:43.920
because I, you know, I said earlier that I don't like going into court and I have gone into court,
00:08:49.200
but I really pride myself on my reputation and track record for getting my clients matter resolved
00:08:58.240
outside of court. And I would say the vast majority over 90% of my cases settle, um, either through a
00:09:06.560
mediation process or just through negotiations and discussions between counsel. And I think that is
00:09:13.040
really, um, what I would bring to the table with respect to what, what really is, um, essentially a
00:09:22.400
divorce from Canada. What else qualifies you to be a good, uh, candidate for running Alberta?
00:09:29.920
Well, I'm, I'm 100% dedicated to this. I, I, I, I have the courage. I think I've demonstrated to
00:09:38.080
Albertans through my advocacy, particularly in the past two years that I am, I'm not afraid and that
00:09:45.120
this is something that is near and dear to my heart and living in a society where the laws are respected,
00:09:52.400
the rule of law is enforced and that people are held accountable is very important to me because
00:09:58.960
what I've seen over the past number of years is that many, many politicians and other, um, elites,
00:10:07.360
let's call them, might go through the exercise of, of seeming to be held accountable, but nothing
00:10:14.160
ever comes to fruition. And I really believe that because I've been so outspoken and, and I'm passionate
00:10:21.680
about this issue and about, um, making sure that Alberta is the best province and most prosperous
00:10:27.840
province, uh, possible that I, I, my personality and my integrity stand for itself.
00:10:37.440
There's probably a lot of people who have heard discussion of, of the separatist movement or,
00:10:44.000
you know, Alberta sovereignty, um, and, and discussion around the sovereignty act.
00:10:50.080
Why don't you paint a little bit of a better picture for people who may not understand what
00:10:54.560
an independent Alberta would look like? Well, not only does, um, the independence party advocate
00:11:01.840
for the referendum on independence, which will provide us with the leverage in Ottawa to either
00:11:08.320
open up, um, negotiations with Ottawa to get a better, a deal for Albertans or for us to chart our own
00:11:15.280
course. And, and without that leverage, uh, I, I think that what we've seen with previous politicians,
00:11:23.520
including, um, uh, Jason Kenney's response in how he dealt with the referendum on equalization,
00:11:29.200
for instance, which was basically a letter writing campaign, if that to Ottawa, um, regarding
00:11:35.840
Albertans desire to change equalization. I think that, um, an independence minded government
00:11:44.480
will be a government and under my leadership will be the government that will address, um, a myriad of
00:11:51.040
things. Uh, some of the things are, that are on the top of my list include doing a robust independent
00:11:57.920
inquiry about the handling of COVID-19 and also, um, to hold these people who were pivotal, um, or
00:12:06.480
connected with the decision-making and the rollout of, of all aspects of, of the last two years accountable,
00:12:13.760
both civilly and criminally. And the other thing is, um, I, I think that an independent, under my
00:12:20.080
leadership, I'm seeking to not only hold elected governmental officials accountable. I'm hoping,
00:12:27.040
I want to address the bureaucracy. I think that as a society, we've become too accepting and
00:12:33.760
complacent of a nanny state type of top-down government where the government dictates to
00:12:40.160
the citizens more like subjects rather than citizens that, uh, what they are to do and how
00:12:46.480
they are to conduct their lives. And I think, um, the majority, uh, a vast majority of the bureaucracy
00:12:52.240
needs to be fired. And it's a strong word, but I, I don't, I don't see any other way of sugarcoating it
00:12:58.800
because, um, we are a highly regulated, uh, province. We're a highly regulated country and it's impeding,
00:13:07.600
um, commerce and it's impeding and encroaching on basic, um, the abilities for families and individuals
00:13:18.000
to do basic things. And, you know, you need to relate a regulation or a fund or a, um, license or a fee
00:13:26.400
to do almost anything these days. And, and I want to see that end. And so I'll be looking at, um, reducing
00:13:34.960
government substantially. Uh, also, I, I believe I'm well, um, qualified to tackle the legislation.
00:13:43.600
We need to look at the legislation that has violated, that violates the, um, rights and freedoms
00:13:50.400
of individuals now. And we need to repeal it. So for example, the public health act, the public health
00:13:56.560
act is a very problematic and it's been on the books for over 20 years, but that legislation gave, um,
00:14:04.960
uh, Dr. Dina Henshaw, I call her hee-haw, um, the power to do what she did. And, uh,
00:14:13.440
the fact that a bureaucrat was given that much authority must never happen again. And so
00:14:21.600
legislation such as that, that violate these rights and freedoms must be repealed. You know,
00:14:27.840
all of our laws are subject to, uh, you know, the charter of rights and freedoms and the bill of
00:14:32.640
rights, Alberta bill of rights. And the Alberta bill of rights, um, in the preamble talks about how
00:14:39.440
all laws regulations need to be subject to bill of rights, right? So what I've seen though, is that
00:14:47.840
laws are being created, regulations are being created that are absolutely, that contradict and
00:14:53.040
apply in the face of these fundamental principles that we've grown up. I've grown up believing to be
00:14:59.520
true. Um, in addition to repealing the laws though, I think we need to also implement laws to ensure that
00:15:08.800
this does not happen again and be strong in what we're doing. For instance, I want to table legislation
00:15:15.600
very early on upon forming government that, um, prevents any employer for ever discriminating
00:15:22.960
against an employee for health related matters. I want to get rid of the mass mandatory masking.
00:15:29.760
These sorts of things are not within the purview of government, I believe. And, um, you know, I'm a very
00:15:36.240
big advocate for, um, for a limit, trying to do my best to eliminate censorship. And, and I think that
00:15:44.160
we need to restore parent and property rights back to, um, individuals and families where they belong.
00:15:52.800
So in Alberta, you know, I, I guess the idea of an independent Alberta, people who don't really
00:15:59.120
understand what that looks like, how, how does that keep us part of Canada, but yet separate us?
00:16:05.200
I think some people are seeing it as we would literally be cut off from Canada, from the CPP,
00:16:11.920
from, you know, the RCMP, things like that. So your vision of what this looks like for the province,
00:16:18.480
can you, can you sort of speak to that? How do we participate in Canada?
00:16:24.000
Well, I think it's going to really depend on how the negotiations go. Um, ultimately, uh, I'm prepared
00:16:31.120
and the independence party is advocating for and prepared to leave Canada, which means that, uh, what,
00:16:37.040
what would happen is that Alberta would become a constitutional republic, its own country and
00:16:43.760
would have the exact same services that you are speaking about right now. Um, provincial police
00:16:50.480
force, its own pension, um, and public services to same as you would have right now, um, as a citizen
00:16:58.560
of Canada. Now, financially, how is that beneficial for Albertans? I think, I think there's a financial
00:17:05.440
picture and worry that coming out of Canada, coming out of the country, um, would, would be detrimental.
00:17:12.880
Speak to that a little bit. Well, I, I think the actual, um, opposite is true. I think that when you
00:17:19.440
factor in the equalization payments that we give, um, annually and that we only get a third of it back
00:17:25.600
and, um, um, the fact that, um, income tax, federal income tax would be, um, eliminated right off,
00:17:33.840
right off the top. When you look at the policies that we're proposing that we want to enact based
00:17:41.120
on the philosophy that we promote a free enterprise system with little government overreach, um, the fact
00:17:48.640
that we will, um, be very active in, in ensuring that our resources, um, are competitively marketed
00:17:59.440
and that, and, and exported and that we are a strong player worldwide, I think that immediately we will
00:18:06.560
be better off just by reducing federal income tax and by eliminating the carbon tax, by eliminating
00:18:13.440
those, uh, the equalization payment, Albertans will already be, um, better off on day one.
00:18:20.240
And then as far as, uh, as far as, you know, the role of Alberta on the global scale being its own,
00:18:30.400
uh, you know, country as you're, as you're referring to it, um, a bit landlocked, uh, you know, being that
00:18:39.520
it's sort of, you know, separated from any kind of waterways, uh, when it comes to sort of the export
00:18:45.440
of oil, uh, we really are, our option is to go, to go south. Uh, you know, how, how do you plan to,
00:18:53.200
uh, mitigate that challenge or that barrier? Well, I think that it will be in the best interest
00:18:57.920
for our neighbors to, to negotiate with us because we are such a resource rich province
00:19:03.520
that, um, they are going to want, I believe, to work with us in order to facilitate the commerce,
00:19:09.520
um, that will only benefit their, their provinces. And not only that, I believe that, you know,
00:19:15.600
there's a movement, uh, growing in Canada and a general, um, um, distrust of, of especially the
00:19:24.400
federal government in Ottawa and legacy political parties to be able to get the job done. And I suspect,
00:19:30.960
you know, there's a growing movement in BC and in Saskatchewan in particular with respect to
00:19:36.080
this, and they're really looking, um, to Alberta, um, to see with, with, with a lot of interest to see,
00:19:44.240
um, you know, that we can, when we can do this, how it's done. And many people have reached out to
00:19:51.200
the party, um, to, um, start speaking about how they might engage in their own independence movement
00:19:58.880
themselves. And so I don't see it being an issue. And besides which, um, I, I think that Albertans are,
00:20:07.120
because we have such a strong economy, and I think that out of all the provinces in Canada,
00:20:12.160
we have by far the best option, um, and ability to carry out this endeavor that, um, we will be
00:20:20.400
lucrative and successful in, in the ultimate negotiations internationally, uh, to ensure that,
00:20:27.520
you know, the existing contracts, you know, continue, um, and, you know, albeit
00:20:34.320
it's a little bit differently likely under, um, a different governing model that we're proposing,
00:20:41.040
but that I, I think that the majority of, of the people around us and our international partners
00:20:48.320
will probably be, um, quite willing to negotiate with us. So you've been doing a lot of traveling
00:20:55.200
around and speaking with Albertans over the last few months. Uh, and what have you heard from
00:21:01.120
Albertans as far as concerns about an independent Alberta that you can sort of speak to and, uh, and
00:21:09.120
perhaps even some you anticipate, but have a plan to work through? I think most of the concerns stem
00:21:15.120
around fear, um, and, and not understanding, um, what the benefits are around independence. And also,
00:21:26.320
of course, their Canadian identity. I mean, that's a big one and I understand that, but at the same
00:21:34.160
time, um, it doesn't mean that they have to not be Canadian, right? As well, uh, Alberta just needs to
00:21:40.960
do something different. We have been trying, the government of Alberta has been trying to get a
00:21:46.080
better deal with Ottawa since the joint confederation. And quite honestly, nobody's been able to do that.
00:21:53.360
The reform party wasn't able to do that. And, you know, right up until, you know, Jason Kenney not being
00:21:59.280
able to do that, even, even with a referendum to, um, renegotiate or end equalization in, um,
00:22:09.920
in the last referendum. And so, you know, I think that, um, it's, it's that fear of uncertainty,
00:22:19.920
but, um, based on the information that I've read and the research that I've done,
00:22:24.960
I think that, um, it is the only tool, um, that will be effective in giving us the leverage we need
00:22:33.680
to open up the constitution. You know, I'm not, I don't have a crystal ball. I don't know where things
00:22:39.760
are going to go ultimately, but if Ottawa understands that we as Albertans are serious about this,
00:22:47.840
you can better, best be sure that they will come to the table with years to listen.
00:22:53.520
Right. And so, so with that, depending on how the negotiations go, will depend on how, um, the
00:23:01.520
independence party of Alberta pushes forward, uh, with, with how much independence we are seeking,
00:23:08.720
right? Like, so what you're saying is, is if the federal government does, um, come to the table
00:23:14.400
and negotiate, then we could stay within better confederation, but with a better deal, as you call
00:23:19.840
it. Well, and you know, nothing's off the table, right? You know, I, I think that we have to be able
00:23:25.200
to look at the political climate at the time, what is happening to our economy at the time. I think we,
00:23:32.160
we would, but if negotiations fail, IE they're, you know, ignored or obstructed in any way,
00:23:41.600
then that clear majority pursuant to the clarity act will give us the authority to chart our own
00:23:47.840
course. And I think that's really important. And after all, that's what Quebec was able to achieve
00:23:53.200
a better deal within confederation in Canada, um, with their efforts years before.
00:23:59.120
So if we were to be able to achieve similarly, what Quebec has, uh, would that be enough for
00:24:06.640
the independence party of Alberta to stay within confederation? Well, you know what, that will
00:24:11.040
have to be up to the members. Yeah. I mean, and, and, and the citizens of Alberta ultimately, and, um,
00:24:19.040
I'm just one vote and one voice. And so, you know, my style is, um, is to, is to advocate
00:24:31.280
for the constituents and advocate for the citizens of Alberta and what they want.
00:24:36.560
Um, the referendum, if, if we are, if we are, um, blessed with being, um, given the opportunity to
00:24:43.840
form government in the next election, then we believe we have the moral authority based on our
00:24:48.640
platform and our policies and what we stand for to have the referendum within the first year forming
00:24:53.680
government. And that's what we're intending to do. And thereafter, you know, we'll be working on all
00:24:59.280
of these other things that I've discussed, um, in the meantime, as an independence minded government
00:25:04.000
that desperately need to be addressed, uh, so that, uh, we can improve Albertans position just within
00:25:10.320
Alberta, uh, without the constraints of government that are tied to, um, these globalist organizations
00:25:18.960
that have really put us under their thumb. And so I don't want to say, um, that I want to say that
00:25:26.480
everything is possible, but know that, um, my preference is to work for the best interests of Albertans first.
00:25:35.840
Right. Now the leadership vote for the independence party
00:25:39.680
of Alberta is in September. What's the date of that? It's September 10th. Okay. And there is a
00:25:45.200
deadline to become a party, uh, to become a party member in order to participate in that vote. And
00:25:50.560
that deadline is tomorrow. That's tomorrow. That's right. August 20th is tomorrow and it's shaping up
00:25:56.640
to be a really fun, um, political leadership race, and I'm excited about it. But certainly if, if Albertans
00:26:04.480
want to be part of this process and choosing the next leader for this movement, you know, a leader that
00:26:10.800
has a wide appeal to, or could have wide appeal to, uh, the majority of Albertans and has the background
00:26:18.960
and the competency in order to, you know, take the next step to, um, sever ties legally with Canada. Um,
00:26:29.120
this is their opportunity to join the party, become a member, and then vote on, on the 10th.
00:26:37.040
Now you have a website, um, that people can go to, to learn a little bit more about you,
00:26:41.840
get, uh, some more idea on your thoughts and background and strategy. Uh, and then as well,
00:26:47.440
links through to the Indepart, uh, Independence Party of Alberta website where they can become a
00:26:53.280
member. Uh, and the website is? It's www.KatherineKowalchuk.ca. Yeah. And we'll have that up on
00:27:00.240
the, um, on the story as well so that people can click through to it. And I'm also on Facebook,
00:27:05.360
Twitter, and Instagram, and happy to answer any questions. Um, and you can also reach me through
00:27:11.600
email on my website and again, happy to answer any questions. So that's Katherine Kowalchuk,
00:27:17.920
uh, and she is, uh, running for the Independence Party of Alberta. And, uh, Katherine, we just want
00:27:22.880
to thank you for coming in and, uh, sharing some of the vision that you have for Alberta. And, uh,
00:27:28.320
and I think more importantly as well, um, sort of where this has come from for you and why this is so
00:27:35.360
near and dear to your heart. Thank you, Melanie. And thank you for all the work you're doing as well.
00:27:41.600
Thank you for all the work you're doing. Thank you.